Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

ANALYSIS: Iraq Just Won The Information War

marco | 29.12.2002 16:17

Iraq just won the information war, when Trade Minister
Mohammed Mehdi Saleh told a solidarity conference in
Baghdad "Iraq's oil, nationalized by the president...
from the hands of the British and Americans in 1972...
will remain in the hands of this people and this leadership."

ANALYSIS: IRAQ JUST WON THE INFORMATION WAR

Iraq just won the information war, when Trade Minister
Mohammed Mehdi Saleh told a solidarity conference in
Baghdad "Iraq's oil, nationalized by the president...
from the hands of the British and Americans in 1972...
will remain in the hands of this people and this leadership."

This quote is getting more mileage than anything Washington
can pump out of the "WagTheDog-Room" deep inside its Pentagon.

If you watch all the volleys being lobbed in both directions
with any kind of a neutral eye, it's like watching a pingpong
match. And it looks like Saddam Hussein might have won a
decisive victory.

Washington is busy trying to leak out the possibility that
Hussein can live in Belize, Costa Rica, Ireland and other
Tony Blair holdings if he wants to avert war. They sound
a little desperate trying to claim "Washington could fight
and win two wars at once if need be." They also work at
saying they've begun training in Vieques again, and they
obsess their hardest to avoid two issues. Linkage to
Israel and linkage to Oil.

Well, Hussein seems to have kicked Bush in the horseteeth
on this one. Or was that horse-kicked Bush in the teeth?
Yeah, that's it. Information is getting out. And the
Pentagon is trying desperately to spin it, respin it
and twist it any way they can; but this one doesn't seem
twistable. It's clear and it's concise.

The Iraqi people are going to fight to hold on to the
oil fields they believe they have the rights to because
they've lived on that land for as long as anyone can
remember.

This is a perfect model for Chiapas, Nigeria, Venezuela
and Black Mesa, Arizona.

No longer will the Untied States government be able to
trick a people into leaving their land, or forking over
precious resources for pennies a pound when the people
have become smart enough to say "you want our resources?
Pay us dearly."

And in Iraq's case, they're asking to be paid in the blood
of young men and women from the 50 states.

marco
- Homepage: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1228-06.htm

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

I don't think so...

29.12.2002 17:06

Anyone who thinks that Iraqi oil really belongs to the Iraqi people must be living in dreamland...

Paul Edwards


What are the principles here ?

29.12.2002 18:26

Have you seen the map of where the oil is ? Almost all iraqi oil is in a small part of the kurdish territory in the north east. Thats why saddam couldn't let them go. The rest of iraq would be penniless.

So if we are people of principle, what is the principle?

Apparently you are proposing:
"any underground resource belongs rightfully to the people who have lived longest on top of it"

I don't quite see why, but lets leave that and look if its practical and logical.

Lets imagine that all the oil in the world is under one field, belonging to one family. Can they hold the whole world to ransom, even if they never found it themselves, could never have refined or utilised it ? Well, lets say they can.

Now - who do they share this gigantically desirable ownership with ? All their known relatives ? The rest of the village ? The rest of the district, most of whom they have never met ? The racial group to which they belong ? The nation state in which they are situated (maybe against their will) ? The whole human race ? All species on the planet ?

If you were arguing for the whole human race, I could accept you as a man of principle. Arguing for any smaller grouping involves arbitrary decisions which seem to involve no principle at all - unless you say no sharing whatever, which might be logical, but is appalling to me.

What this means is that sharing this "originator" benefit is going to be some sort of practical fudge unless we declare it as belonging equally to all the people of earth.

But there is a different question, and I think it is the one that matters here. On what principle will the actual enjoyment of being the end-user of the resource be based ? Who gets to use the oil ?

To be specific, we have one group of people in the world (mostly the USA) who are using a hugely disproportionate amount of the available oil. This has leveraged them into huge advantages, like enough buying power to buy most of the rest, or enough military power to take it. And doing either will leverage them up some more.

What in hell do we do about THIS ?

Without waving a magic wand and creating a perfect equal-shares-for-all world, which honestly no-one knows how to do, and history tells us would go horribly wrong if we tried.

I don't know. Do you ?

Commentator


This is the begining of a new debate ...

30.12.2002 13:30

This thred is proving to be subtly intresting.
As a result of the imperialist/facistic agenda of resource appropriation, it seems that the questions arising from the issues of ownership and control of these resources are being asked, alongside basic questions of ethics and morality.
This surely must be a gigantic shot in the foot for those oil crazed zionazies, who hate all questions directed at their continual 'rights' to our resources and the poisonous methods they use to extract paper[electronic] wealth from them.
We are at war with these select few remember, a constant infomation war, where they will appropriate every medium to murder and distort the message that they number less than 25 000 [about 500 families] and yet control nearly half of all the real wealth [land, resources, capital investments] and significantly more of the less real wealth [money, metals, stocks and bonds], whilst maintaining the falsehood of nations as protection for their activities.
In this infomation war our weapons are truth and the ability to ask meaningful, resonant, questions that cut to the chase and put these shadowy masters in the light to squirm.
So far in this thred, there have been these questions, and we must all learn from each others questions good or bad. I appreciate and thank you all.

jackslucid
mail e-mail: jackslucid@hotmail.com


Belongs to Iraqis

02.01.2003 07:57

Iraqis will ultimately determine how the oil is pumped out. It makes no difference what we think.
I'm pretty sure that the disgust at the brazen imperialism of the USA, coupled with the knowledge that USA used up all its resources, will make them resist any foreign control,and if they do somehow retain controle of the fields, they will produce far below what they would otherwise be able to on a daily basis.
Also, terrorists are now seeing how dependent on middle east the oil market is, and over the next decades will make it their sole target.
War and military occupation won't stop what's going to happen

asdf


asdf : how would iraqis maintain control ????

04.01.2003 04:28

That's very cryptic, asdf.
What on earth do you mean ?
Surely in an Iraq overrun and ruled by the US for the next twenty years (say) very little on matters of oil would be decided by iraqis. To bring this about is the main purpose of US aggression.
Can you expand, please ? It doesn't make sense to me.
Surely down all the ages one of the main aims and results of imperialist aggression has been to take control of natural resources, and this was hugely successful?

Commentator


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech