because venik is a highly unreliable source of information.

check out his website for claims of NATO aircraft destroyed in Serbia. Interesting but fictional. he also believes in anti gravity and that the Russian submarine, the Kursk, was sunk by the Americans.

And do you really think that the Russian Intelligence services are going to give details of radio intercepts to someone like him?

he translates them you dumb shit
and serbia maintained 98% of its attack force, that's a fact!

where do think he gets them from, dumber shit? do you think the russians would employ a translater who then splashes everything over his own private website?

"serbia retained 98% of its attack force" - what has that to do with my comment? did I make any comment about serbia's attack forces?

but perhaps you might prefer Milosevic in power and the ethnic cleansing to have continued in Kosovo.

Yeah Septic, the Pentagon also believes in anti-gravity (so do lots others), the Kursk theory is also highly plausible (lots about yank presence in the region, what the submarine struck were not explained, in fact sidestepped)... and, don't you know, NATO tells a lot of lies routinely, and servile press merely vomit that shit to sympathetic "rational" ear like the one you've got..


My, my, just because things are way beyond your comprehension doesn't mean they cannot be true.

Are you related to Dumbya Bush, btw?

Just asking...

ok, give me a reference to the Pentagon support for antigravity.

and why does the Russian navy and government now say the loss of the Kursk was due to HTP powered torpedoes? [The UK abandoned HTP in submarines in the 1950s after an explosion in a submarine in Portland harbour]

Now point me to any US or UK submarine that has had to undergo extensive repair work. The Kursk was an extremely large submarine. ANything colliding with it would have probably come worse off.

Claims for serbian destruction of aircraft. These would have crashed in serbian territory [according to Venik]. So why doesn't he give us make, model, serial number of the aircraft concerned?

Nato always lies. Venik never does, of course.

Rationality is sometimes useful. Like saying: give me evidence.

The [aeronautics.ru] website details how the radio interceptions are made.

May be you want to try it yourself.

Also respect should be given to the accuracy of Venik's reports through this PIG aggression in Iraq. Do you dispute it?

As for the Kursk. Fuck all those who went to war in it.
But read the article carefully and you will see that Venik's version is *largely* theory.

As for Serbia and the pigs who ruled it and fought over it, who cares what the russian pigs have to say about it? But could I point out that atleast one top secret stealth bomber was shot down and paraded with serial numbers and all even for pigTV like the BBC.

Talking of serial numbers and PIG media I wonder what you have to say about the Shula market missile's serial number and manufacturer's code as reported by Robert Fisk of the Independent?
Venik overlooked this incident for your information.

Do you want to blame this currently very informative website for being focussed on military aspects ... then go on and I will probably not dispute you.
But do not even attempt to imply that the aggressor PIGs in IRAQ are not implementing a fullscale censorship and spreading misinformation on Iraq related matters.

Last time they did it in this scale PIGs with ears learnt later that about 100,000 forced conscripts were brutally murdered and the most disgusting unconventioanl weapons were used by the PIGs.

the site actually says:
"The radio address was recorded following an incident in the area of Umm Qasr when, in plain view of the locals, British soldiers executed two Iraqis after finding a submachine-gun in their house;"

with no attribution at all. Nor has this incident been verified by any other observers or reporters.

there is little on the site that couldn't be gathered from an intelligent reading of the media, with a good sauce of wishful thinking.

"But could I point out that atleast one top secret stealth bomber was shot down and paraded with serial numbers and all even for pigTV like the BBC."

Give me a source for this.

Sourcing from the British Bullshit Coorporation....


As you point out that you do ''intelligent reading of the media''

I point you to pay attentin to this sentence.

''The US news agency Associated Press says an unnamed senior US defence official has confirmed an F-117A Stealth fighter was missing after a mission over Yugoslavia''

The bit about the German pilot of course is the most classic bullshit in this article!

As you seem to be such a PIG, here is another article for you enjoy INTELLIGENTLY and I upload a picture of the often bombed Bath Party HQ for you masturbate upon!!



Fucking disgusting british PIG! Is Col. Parker-Bowles in Basra?

As the links seem corrupted in my previous post here are they again.....

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/305973.stm

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2886805.stm

------------------------------------------
The image that has not uploaded correctly
is here...

 http://images.indymedia.org/imc/uk/irqgirl.jpg

Hope it works this time.

If it is the British BULLSHIT Corporation, why do you cite it as a reliable source?

You wanted a source for what I monitored on an old BBC broadcast and the best I could do was look for the corresponding story in their bullshit website!

Anyhow if you like reading the British Bullshits why not read this post

 http://uk.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=61442&group=webcast