Hi Klaus: With your posted reminder today that the mental health fast protest, in Pasadena, CA, begins tomorrow I would like to return briefly to the issue of EHS being MISdiagnosed as a mental illness. While many EHS sufferers are understandably uncomfortable about finding themselves anywhere near the whole mental illness scene--either with or without that prefixed MIS--the facts are that EHS is resolutely avoked not to exist by medical and governmental authorities. So, what can we do?
My belief is that noone nor group who is affected by EHS must be sacrificed while a campaign for EHS recognition as a distinct environmental illness/allergy presses forward. That is also in line with Human Rights theory which places more emphasis on each individual's rights rather than on the welfare of a group, a nation, etc., as was the former practice.
I could not favour a strategy that those EHS people unfortunate enough to have been enmeshed in pscyh "care" should be cast aside/ignored in the interests of getting the non-psch. medicos to believe in our EHS reality and gain official acceptance for other EHS patients/sufferers who have been less obviously (not officially) tarred with the "mental patient" brush.
Last week I had a long overdue letter from Ranka, an EHS sufferer in Croatia whose condition is repeatedly ignored by her psychiatrists. You have posted Ranka's case history Klaus on Citizens Initiative Omega, dated 4/1/03 and 5/1/03. (In a later posting, 15/3/03, she recounts the adverse effect of living beside a large transmitter.) And it made me see more clearly than ever that anyone incarcerated by psychs who refuse to consider that their patient's most pressing problem IS EMR based can not be ignored by us EHS campaigners. After all, we are the only ones who can and are willing to stand up for them, confront the psychs, and get them to see the patient is not imagining the EHS condition. I will paste in below an excerpt from a letter I have just written on behalf of
. . .
Ranka's case is most unfortunate. Her Croatian doctors do not believe in her professed EHS symptoms and she is incarcerated in an isolated pscy. facility where she is severely affected by the T.V. lights, etc. She has been in and out of this facility now since she returned to Croatia a few years ago from the U.S. From an extensive bio she sent me some time ago plus from other emails (when they let her out) I know she reacts severely to EMR environments. In fact it would appear to me, lay person though I am but personally knowledgeable of EHS bioeffects, that her major problem IS EMR based. Most disturbingly, I did not receive two letters she mentioned sending me asking for help nor did she hear anything from Dr. Monro and Breakspear when she wrote to them requesting that they affirm to her doctors that EHS is not an imagined condition.
Can anything be done about doctors who refuse to listen to other experts on the EHS condition and keep a patient who is EHS locked up and suffering horribly from exposure to EMR in their "caring" facility? . .
Perhaps readers who have joined the group more recently might like to know that another account of a U.K. woman who was sectioned (involuntary detention in a psychiatric institution) due to her doctor not believing in her EHS condition, is archived at C.I.O., and dated 15/9/02 ("Another tragic misdiagnosis of an EHS sufferer . . ..)
Best, Imelda, Cork, Ireland
Re: Radar and soldiers
Of course the issue of radar effects goes back to the first years of the device in the 1940s when adverse effects were being reported such as temporary sterility. A post war paper by Locranjan et al confirmed this and then there were the studies by Sigler in the 1960s on Downs Syndrome incidence around USAF bases with radar and so on. I am sure you have all these. I wont offer a literature review except to point out that with
increasing frequency the electric component is a larger component of the total energy mix, and we here at my lab believe it is the electric component which is the active bio-parameter. So the modern higher frequency radars are likely to be more bioactive in my view. There is also the whole issue of ELF pulsing too.
Best, Roger Coghill
About Saint-Cyr L'Ecole
A word about Saint-Cyr L'Ecole:
There is too much cancer, it's a fact but why, nobody can't say it. The epidemiologic investigation is not possible: when they found a too much number of cancer, the phone operator stopped the base station: it's very good for the children but now whe can't know nothing about the exposition !
A fate ?.........but there is a lesson: If the parents are active, they can remove antennae! You can do it !!!!!!! :-)
First Time In Israel
First time in Israel, a municipality is looking deeper into the issue of the cellular antennas.
The the vice-mayor of the city Haifa, Shmuel Gelbhart, has stopped the process of erecting new cellular antennas in the city for a month, and the reason is that he wants a review of the updated studies on the subject. The cellular companies accept this new attitude and do not resist.
The person who is second to the new mayor, who was elected just recently, is also responsible for all the new building planning and works in the city, and he is an architect. Gelbhart has the opposite position compared to the former municipality which voted for the antennas while ignoring the health subject completely. The former municipality built new flower squares in Haifa, just in order to rent it to the cellular comanies for more and more antennas. So this a serious change for Haifa: someone actually recognizes that the health issue actually exists !
Gelbhart recognizes the fact that the current standards ignore the non-thermal effects. In the weekend local newspaper, "Haifa Time" he is cited as saying: "The central problem of the current national planning program is that it is based exclusively on the limited standard which refers to the thermal possible effect of the antennas, without refering to the other effects for which there is no standard".
The new cellular services require a significant increase of the antennas quantity in the city. Gelbhart: "The question is, are the city residents ready to bear it and is the national planning program and its standards assure the public health beyond any doubt".
It was decided to prepare an updated review of the research on the subject, by the Cities Association for Environment Quality. Until the results of this review arrive, the municipality will delay permissions for erecting new antennas except for industrial areas and areas that are far from the residental population.
The news item reported that if the researchs will show a need for changing the policy, the municipality will demand from the Environment Quality Ministry to change also the national planning program.
I am very skeptic about the review and my skeptism is based on the history of the Cities Association behaviour about air pollution (the "no problem" approach), but Gelbhart's action is based on knowledge. He dares where not too many people with the same job dare, and this is already something.
National Antenna Tower (Electromagnetic Sensitivity Survey)
Dear Mr. Riedlinger,
Thank you for your email. Yes, our organization is doing such as survey and to make sure you have all the information, I am attaching some background information for you. Also, in the last day or so, I have received confirmation of the date and time of our launch. I will be notifying everyone I have been in touch with with specific information the beginning of September.
.... On March 28th of this year Industry Minister Allan Rock announced that a team of researchers from the University of New Brunswick had been selected to undertake a thorough examination of the national environment surrounding the approval of radio antennas. Minister Rock announced also that he had created a panel of experts, called the National Antenna Tower Advisory Committee, to advise the policy review team from UNB throughout
the course of its consultation and research activities.
Professor David Towsend was selected to head both the policy review team at UNB and the national advisory panel of experts. Within one year of commencing, he must tender a report to Industry Canada with policy recommendations for improvement to Canada's antenna authorization processes. These recommendations should embrace the dual objectives of
community involvement in tower approval processes and expansion of the economic and social benefits of wireless technologies across Canada.
In order to facilitate broad participation in the review itself and to gain a better understanding of the underlying issues, the UNB team has created a special website intended to stimulate and capture a national dialogue on antenna tower issues. We are calling it an e-Town Hall website and we believe that it represents a significant step forward in e-Consultation in the areas of public policy examination and reform.
We have created a beta version of the e-Town Hall website and, currently, we are examining its content, functionality and stability. The Site will be launched at 10:00 am on September 3, 2003. I will be sending the URL to those who I have been in contact with prior to the actual launch.
I hope that you will register at the site and participate in the antenna questionnaire and the discussion forum. Please watch the Industry Canada website for news of the launch of our e-Town Hall. Likely, news about the website and a connecting link to it will be posted on the following page: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/sf07012e.html.
If you go to the above site there will be a like www.antennareview.ca. This link will get you directly into our site. It will not be operational until Sept 3 at 10:00 New Brunswick time. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
At 09:25 AM 14/08/03 -0700, you wrote:
I recieved this message from Imelda O'Connor in Ireland and would like to know if your organization intends,(I hope so), to do the survey metioned below.If so I would very much appreciate being informed of when and how to participate.I have a list of people that would also like to join in.Thank You and Best Regards Robert Riedlinger
Dear Ms. O'Connor,
Thank you for your email. During the months of August/September, our organization will be doing an electronic survey on this topic and would appreaciate your comments. As soon as it is up and running, I will send you the URL and you will be able to add comment/suggestions as well as particpate in our survey.
At 02:24 PM 02/07/03 +0100, you wrote:
Robert Riedlinger, a Canadian resident who is an EHS (electrohypersensitive) friend and fellow activist in seeking formal medical cum governmental recognition of EHS has requested me to send you on my experiences of EHS and of being misdiagnosed as psychotic.
First, I will describe below some of the adverse bioeffects I experience from excessive (that is for my tolerance level)exposure to EMR sources such as masts, cellphones, and most forms of e-equipment. I wrote up these observational notes in 2001 for my doctor, but the effects I experienced then have continued...
Informant: Robert Riedlinger
Tesla’s Electromagnetic Pyramids (And The Later "War on Terror")
"The will to truth, which is still going to tempt us to many a hazardous enterprise; that celebrated veracity of which all philosophers have hitherto spoken with reverence: what questions this will to truth has already set before us! What strange, wicked, questionable questions! It is already a long story yet does it not seem as if it has only just begun?"
Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil
Informant: George Paxinos
Dear K. RUDOLPH,
''GORGUN SHIELD'' replay exactly the same frequency and the modulation of the RF emission which comes from the radar. In the same time it transmits the same identical radar RF emission undar the 180 degrees with the amplification. Shield which is working in the fix emitting systems is connected to earth. Therefore this type of the shield is not possible to use on the mobil systems, mobil phone and aircraft..............ex.
In this point also I want to give information to Prof. Dr. Sianette KWEE. If she kindly contact to me, I want to send her some technical information. I also thanks to Mr. L. BLACKHALL and Joseph because of their sincere support. If some institution who has instruments to measure to GORGUN SHIELD, it is possible to repeat the measurement. GORGUN
SHIELD contains new physical principal. During the measurements, engineers who are measuring the GORGUN SHIELD they said that ''IF WE DIDN'T MEASURE PERSONALLY IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO BELIEVE THAT THIS SYSTEM WORKS THAT MUCH EFFECTFULLY''. Therefore it is better to repeat measurements. I have also measurements protocol. I like to say tecnical people of the World that, to day systems which are working with the principal of the resonance those can able to obtains very different results from the systems are working with the classical principals because, principals are correct when the working parameters are the fixed. If we change the working parameters, old principals are not any more valid. In this point of wiew we can give different example. It is very hard to explain here with writing (Examples can be the from medicine, chemistry, physics...........ex).
These are matters which I was teaching to the my students in the lecture in the State University. I want to repeat here some informations as a reference. These are not the simply theory.
EMF may be could use for differend aim.
2) Medical applications,
3) Medical diagnosis,
4) Electromagnetic spectrometry as a histopathological examination. This new type of the examination is very precise and the functional in
the point of view of the activity of the examined cell.
5) Scanner and identify of the different materials,
6) For create nuclear reaction with the using non radioactive material (In lab experiments obtained emission of the beta and gama emission and emission of the 7 GW. energy in 2 n.sec. time). In this reaction used the ordinary non radioactive materials and after the reaction west material is not the absolutely radioactive.
7) Stop the reaction of the different materials during or before the starting their reaction also in certain distance(Nuleear material or ordinary material).
8) Without increasing diameter of the tickness of the materials, increasing of the their mecchanical resistance.
9) For neutralise the radioactive radiation biological effects.
10) Create invisibility of the aircrafts in the radar (Computerise measurements grafics are avilable).
11) Eliminate the biological effects of the emiting antennas (GORGUN Shield).
I expect the collaboration who interest. In attachment I send the computerised grafics of the GORGUN SHIELD which are made during the measurements. Still I have very litle hope the sincere collaboration of the human being.
My E-Mail addresses indicated in following.
With my best regards.
Dr. S. GORGUN.
Rachel's: The Revolution, Pt. 1
Rachel's: The Revolution, Pt. 2
Bush Sells Environment to Corporations - Oppose Leavitt
Huge power outage hits East Coast
U.S. Moved to Undermine Iraqi Military Before War
Baghdad ultimatum for US troops
Confidence in Iraq war falls below 50%
Witnesses: establishment hounded Kelly to the end
American Foreign Legion?
Was the blackout related to terrorism?
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
US Flip-Flop: Military Apologizes for Sparking Baghdad Protest
Why Does the Bush Administration Hate Our Troops?
US has SUED Voices in the Wilderness
Citizens' Initiative Omega