Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Al Giordano interviews Latuff

Posted by Latuff | 26.08.2003 17:31 | Indymedia

Exclusive interview with Brazilian cartoonist Latuff for Al Giordano's Big, Left, Outside.

THE LATUFF INTERVIEW: “I DON´T GIVE A FUCK IF IMC NYC IS CENSORING ME.”

Brazilian political cartoonist Latuff doesn’t drink anything stronger than coffee, but he’s accompanied me through saideira and caideira, on nights of cerveja e cachaça, from the butecos of São Paulo to the smoke filled bars of Rio de Janeiro (which also indicates his generous tolerance of difference in others). Beyond being editorial cartoonist-in-residence at Narco News, Latuff is my pal.

Some folks from New York City Indymedia are my pals, too. When I won the Drug War on Trial case in 2001, I found myself in the Chapare region of Bolivia, investigating the assassination of a union leader. With little time at that moment to deal with the ensuing press stampede, I gave NY Indymedia the exclusive interview, and told the Commercial Press to get its quotes from there.

Hey, that was about free speech and press freedom, too! Right?

So, imagine my chagrin and lament to learn that Indymedia New York has “hidden” the latest cartoon by Latuff, and struck all reference to it from page one.

This seems to me to be an excellent jumping off point for a discussion of how and how not to censor. What bugs me about this recent incident is that I can’t for the life of me find anything approaching “full disclosure” on the Indymedia NYC site that would provide accountability as to who, exactly, made the decision to “hide” Latuff’s cartoon, or on what criteria it was done. Anonymous censors especially bug me.

The only explanation of “policy” on NY Indymedia that I can find (am I missing something here?) says:

After stories have been published, they can be edited, linked or even deleted by the collective running this site, using the story administration page (password required). . We have a lot of respect for people publishing on our site, so we generally only use these features to fix obvious mistakes, such as typos in a web address; or a duplicate copy of a story. Very rarely, someone abuses our trust, and posts a story that is way outside what the website is set up to do, and we may remove it. We are working on the technology to make this process more transparent, so that you can see when such decisions have been made, and why. In future, we want our audience to be part of this process too.
If this one Indymedia collective hasn’t defined, openly, what constitutes its “trust,” or what “is way outside what the website is set up to do,” it has set up a vague rule, subject to the arbitrary whims and prejudices of its anonymous executioners of Speech, who, after all, are mere human individuals, every one, hiding behind the word “collective” to skew (and inadvertently wreck) the results of the “open publishing” experiment that all Indymedia supposedly embrace by definition.

The thing that also bugs me is how the dominant ideologues of the blogosphere then use the (bad) decision by one collective out of a hundred-and-something local Indymedia organizations to (disingenuously) smear the entire Indymedia movement, to which both Latuff and I have long been allied.

For a glimpse of how crazy and knee-jerk Blogolandia can get, here’s an otherwise sane posting that decries the “hiding” of pro-Israel posts on NY Indymedia but at the same time states: “To their credit, the moderators also hid some posts by anti-semite Latuff, and with good reason.”

First rule: If you wave around big words like “anti-Semite” you should always be called upon to explain what, precisely, constituted “anti-Semitic” in the speech you don't like.

Double Heh, and a somewhat bigger victory: Is it “anti-Semitic” to fail to capitalize Semite? Oooooh. Gotcha!

See how silly it gets, kids? Identity politics, from Left to Right, is more concerned about words (and images) than deeds. How shallow is that?

Still, I feel more disappointed in whatever anonymous Star Chamber members at NYC’s Indymedia collective were responsible for the boneheaded maneuvers that led to this mess. If any member of the NYC Indymedia collective wants to come out from behind the pixel curtain by name, I have some interview questions for ya.

Meanwhile, Latuff (who haveth the dignity to identify thine self), whadaya say we shake the paperweight and see where the snow comes down?

Sunlight. Best. Disinfectant. Yada yada yada.

Al Giordano: Hey Latuff, you troublemaker! I see that NYC Indymedia has "hidden" your latest cartoon (that portrays an occupied-zone Israeli bus as a coffin). Worse, I don't see any explanation as to why that cartoon supposedly doesn't meet standards at an "open publishing" site. I see they've also "hidden" postings of a pro-Israel nature, too. What's going on?

Latuff: IMC NYC published in front page links for two of my posts regarding the blackout and now my Israeli bus cartoon was hidden by them: and not a single explanation about it. But obviously I know the answer. Guess what? It's anti-Semitic! Yes, yes, my good Giordano. Here we go again with just another stupid episode of “cry wolf.”

Al Giordano: In my view, your work has long been one of the most compelling reasons to read various Indymedia sites. In between the flotsam and jetsam of a lot of activist rants and debates, it always seemed to me that the original, quality, political cartooning by Latuff served as a model of what Indymedia ought to be: a place where censored journalists could publish. But you've been censored or "hidden" by other Indymedia sites before (I remember a particular controversy at the Swiss IMC site some time back). What other Indymedia sites, if any, have censored or "hidden" your work?

Latuff: I believe most of IMCs are doing the right thing. I support the efforts of Independent Media Center but, you know, it's not the fault of all IMCs if some assholes are working as censors. Every IMC has its own characteristics. The Israeli bus artwork was not censored on different IMCs including Israel, UK, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Belgium, Sidney, Brazil, Global, Uruguay, Japan, Vancouver and it was also published on the website of Israeli peace group Gush-Shalom, where I’ve contributed with cartoons since 1998. It was specifically an action of censorship from IMC NYC. Shame on them! Not a big deal at all. Since I decided to take the side of Palestinians, I deal with censorship, hacker attacks, and defamation campaigns, even from so-called progressives. My posts will be hidden on spot at IMCs Germany, Switzerland and Austria, all because most of them believe I am a rabid anti-Semitic. But I have very good friends in some IMCs like Palestine and San Francisco.

Al Giordano: Let's talk about the controversial cartoon. I can't for the life of me figure out what is supposedly anti-Semitic about this cartoon. Seems to me that this cartoon speaks an undeniable reality: that the buses inside the Israeli-occupied zones often result to be coffins, as a result of bombings. To me, that cartoon is as accurate as a news photo, in some ways more accurate. There's nothing in the cartoon that cheers the idea of bombings. It simply addresses their root cause: the occupation of Palestinian lands. It's a cartoon that makes me think. I presume it therefore makes others think. And that is always good, in my book. Has anybody offered a coherent argument as to why that cartoon is somehow not publishable at NYC Indymedia?

Latuff: Not 'til now. I tried to express in this cartoon that due occupation of Palestinian territories, the security wall, the settlements and shit, to take a bus in IsraHell can be deadly. That's all. But you know, my slanderers will always try to find a reason for bashing me. If I make a cartoon with a baker putting breads in an oven, people will call me anti-Semitic because Jews were thrown into ovens and such. Everything can be a good excuse.

Al Giordano: I have a theory: that NYC Indymedia, taking heat already for "hiding" pro-Israeli commentaries, decided to "hide" your post so as to be able to claim that it is an equal opportunity censor. (This is something akin to why "human rights" groups focusing on Latin America reach too far sometimes to whack Cuba or Venezuela, in order to "position" themselves as somehow non-partisan, when, after all, human rights is and should be partisan by nature!) This has long been a game of the feeble-minded censors of Left, Right, and Middle: to say "well, we're censoring both sides, so at least we're fair." But my view is that what happens is that such "policies" always fall hardest on those of us who truly do have radical things to say. Was NYC Indymedia's first mistake to censor the rightwing? Did they thus set in motion a situation that led to your cartoon being taken off the front page?

Latuff: I like this "censoring both sides is fair". It reminds me of the usual the mainstream references to the Middle East conflict that consider that "both sides are guilty." Probably Palestinian civilians are guilty for being on the way of bullets and missiles. Why don't they simply move their bodies away from machine gun fire, huh? Giordano, unfortunately many Leftists are confused when dealing with IsraHell/Palestine issues, afraid to be labeled as anti-Semitic, particularly activists from the United States and Europe. That's why they try to please Zionists and anti-Zionists from time to time. Poor guys! I wouldn't like to be in their position. They can't tell the difference between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. I suggest they take a trip to West Bank, like I did in 1999, to look at the real thing.

Al Giordano: Finally, the neo-con bloggers out there are having a field day with this latest faux pas by NYC Indymedia. Aren't they just playing into the hands of their critics with this silly censorious behavior?

Latuff: Funny to see that conservative Dick-Cheney-heads are smiling wide thanks to IMC NYC. Sometimes it seems that the duty of Left is make right-wingers happy. To be honest Giordano, I don't give a fuck if IMC NYC is censoring me. It's not the first time, and will be not the last. When I started to support the Palestinians and their struggle for independence, I knew that I would to face some trouble, but not such an amount of trouble coming from Right AND Left. No sweat, man! I'm not a Palestinian supporter for fun. I'll keep devoting part of my time, art and efforts to promote Palestinian human rights, and the Internet is the jungle for the media Vietcong. They can censor me here and there, but I will always find a place to show my cartoons. There will be always decent people willing to reproduce and distribute them. My art, while they try to suppress it, is being reproduced, worldwide, by individuals, groups, magazines, and newspapers. And they can't do anything about it. That's why they feel so angry towards me. My art is a living entity and will be alive even after my death.

My final message to those neo-cons is: keep trying, boys! Hehehehehehehehehe!!!

Best regards from your Brazilian brother-in-arts,

Latuff

Latuff - Image Maker
Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
 http://www.sinkers.org/latuff

Posted by Latuff
- e-mail: al@bigleftoutside.com
- Homepage: http://www.bigleftoutside.com/

Comments

Hide the following comment

Even Freud is censored on Indy media N.Y.

26.08.2003 23:51



Dear Latuff ,
Even Sigmund Freud was censored on N.Y.Indymedia site . You are in good company.
Indy-Media N. Y. is a Likudnik site .
Severals weeks ago I tried to publish in Indy-Media N.Y.' a letter of Sigmund Freud , where Freud was critical about Zionism . This letter was published in severals european newspapers : In Le Monde , in la Stampa etc...
I was afraid by the reactions of I-M N.Y.
A guy named "Ender" wrote immediatly that this text of Freud come from Nazis sites,and that it is a forgery. I send him the adress of the website where this text was published , exactly the site of Freud Museum in London, which is the official site of Freudians documents . Once more they answered that this site is false site . The letter remained 30 minutes then they suppressed it .

When I send this letter to San Francisco Bay Area they accepted it . But few minutes later appeared a message of "Ender" saying that they have had a discussion at N.Y. indymedia and that they have suppressed this Freud's letter concluding that it is a "fake".
To show you what is the level of censor on Indy medias N.Y. I send you the message censored by this site. They are so Likudniks Zionistes that even Freud is not supported by this Likudniks.They hide them.


Freud and Zionism: One Freud Letter and one article in "Corriere deella Sera"
by Little Sister Monday July 07, 2003 at 05:01 AM


The Freud's letter was taken from the catalogue of an exhibition at Jerusalem University. You can find this Freud's letter on the web" Freud Museum, London":  http://www.freud.org.uk "Freud to day"


1°) The Arab-Israeli Conflict

Freud would not have been surprised at the continuing conflict in the Middle East. He predicted as much 70 years ago.

We can predict Freud's response because of a letter he wrote to Dr. Chaim Koffler in 1930. In February 1930 Freud was asked, as a distinguished Jew, to contribute to a petition condemning Arab riots of 1929, in which over a hundred Jewish settlers were killed. This was his reply:

Letter to the Keren Hajessod (Dr. Chaim Koffler)

Vienna: 26 February 1930

Dear Sir,

I cannot do as you wish. I am unable to overcome my aversion to burdening the public with my name, and even the present critical time does not seem to me to warrant it. Whoever wants to influence the masses must give them something rousing and inflammatory and my sober judgement of Zionism does not permit this. I certainly sympathise with its goals, am proud of our University in Jerusalem and am delighted with our settlement's prosperity. But, on the other hand, I do not think that Palestine could ever become a Jewish state, nor that the Christian and Islamic worlds would ever be prepared to have their holy places under Jewish care. It would have seemed more sensible to me to establish a Jewish homeland on a less historically-burdened land. But I know that such a rational viewpoint would never have gained the enthusiasm of the masses and the financial support of the wealthy. I concede with sorrow that the baseless fanaticism of our people is in part to be blamed for the awakening of Arab distrust. I can raise no sympathy at all for the misdirected piety which transforms a piece of a Herodian wall into a national relic, thereby offending the feelings of the natives.

Now judge for yourself whether I, with such a critical point of view, am the right person to come forward as the solace of a people deluded by unjustified hope.

Your obediant servant,

Freud



Article from Corriere della Sera

-
1°) Sabato, 28 giugno, 2003
VARIE
Pag. 031

E Freud disse no al sionismo: la diaspora è di tutti

I RETROSCENA Una lettera «non propizia» destinata a restare segreta
PIONIERI Per lui la «terra promessa» era la coscienza umana
IL CASO
Di Stefano Paolo

Nel febbraio 1930, Sigmund Freud riceve un appello dell' associazione «Keren Hajessod» in cui gli si chiede di protestare contro le popolazioni arabe in Palestina che vietano agli ebrei le manifestazioni di culto e l' accesso al Muro del Pianto. A quell' appello, inviato a molti eminenti intellettuali ebrei, Freud risponde il 26 febbraio con una lettera che aiuta a comprendere meglio le sue posizioni rispetto al sionismo. Una lettera considerata «non propizia» dal destinatario, il dottor Chiam Koffler, e quindi condannata a rimanere inedita. Non a caso fu trasmessa dallo stesso Koffler al dr. Abraham Schwadron di Gerusalemme (un sionista di sinistra collezionista di autografi) in cambio della promessa che «nessun occhio umano potesse mai vederla». Quel documento «non propizio» viene ora pubblicato da Michele Ranchetti in un saggio intitolato La terra promessa. Una lettera inedita di Freud che appare ne L' ospite ingrato, il semestrale del Centro Studi Franco Fortini. La lettera, in realtà già conosciuta in parte, come osserva lo stesso Ranchetti, rimane imbarazzante ancora oggi, a oltre settant' anni dalla sua stesura. Perché «non è propizio il pensiero di Freud, se esso non serve ad una delle due o più parti in conflitto». «E' uno dei pochissimi esempi... in cui Freud non si mostri reticente o prudente nei riguardi del sionismo e al contrario formuli un giudizio sulle ragioni di una conflittualità che si sarebbe sviluppata in quelle terre», osserva Ranchetti. Sul suo essere ebreo, Freud si era pronunciato più volte: «Posso dire di sentirmi lontano dalla religione ebraica come da tutte le religioni - scrive nel ' 25 -. Per contro ho sempre avuto molto forte il senso di appartenenza al mio popolo, che ho cercato di coltivare anche nei miei figli». E l' anno dopo: «Ciò che mi legava all' ebraismo era (...) non la fede, e nemmeno l' orgoglio nazionale (...). Ho sempre cercato di reprimere l' orgoglio nazionale, quando ne sentivo l' inclinazione (...). Ma tante altre cose rimanevano che rendevano irresistibile l' attrazione per l' ebraismo e gli ebrei, molte oscure potenze del sentimento». E rispetto al movimento sionista? Mai un cenno di assenso, anzi la lettera testimonia una volta per tutte le sue riserve. Ranchetti mette in parallelo la nascita del sionismo (nel 1896, con la pubblicazione de Lo Stato ebraico di Herzl) con la nascita della psicoanalisi (1899, con l' uscita de L' interpretazione dei sogni). Due progetti di «conquista di un territorio», di una terra promessa. Freud non conobbe mai personalmente Herzl, anche se per qualche anno abitarono nella sua stessa strada, la famosa Bergstrasse di Vienna. Nel 1902, Freud gli scrive per informarlo che ha chiesto all' editore di mandargli, per recensione, una copia della Traumdeutung, aggiungendo: «La prego di conservare la copia come testimonianza dell' alta stima in cui ormai da anni, così come altri, tengo lo scrittore e il combattente per i diritti umani del nostro popolo». Ma Freud, che tenne sempre a respingere l' identificazione della psicoanalisi come scienza ebraica, non si dichiarò mai sionista e la sua «terra promessa» era altra cosa rispetto a quella dello scrittore ungherese che fondò l' Organizzazione sionistica mondiale. La «terra promessa» era una patria, per Herzl; la coscienza umana, per Freud. Come sottolinea Ranchetti, per l' uno si tratta di definire un luogo «dove la condivisione degli ideali e delle tradizioni sia libera in una forma di assetto statuale»; per l' altro «la diaspora riguarda tutti gli uomini... per questo la soluzione "territoriale" di Herzl non può non sembrargli riduttiva e, per così dire, inficiata dalla pericolosità di alcune delle sue componenti: il territorio, la lingua, il popolo, lo Stato e, da quando la Palestina è diventata la terra di elezione, la religione e la storia religiosa presente nelle rovine (false) del tempio». Verrà poi, nel ' 39, la grande opera testamentaria di Freud, L' uomo Mosè e la religione monoteistica, oggetto di interpretazioni contrastanti. Per alcuni fu un attacco alle radici stesse dell' ebraismo. Per altri, autobiografia camuffata. Per altri, infine, come il celebre Yosef H. Yerushalmi che vi dedicò uno studio, la storia psicoanalitica di un popolo e di una religione. Resta da chiedersi, osserva ancora Ranchetti, come mai la psicoanalisi non trovò successo in Israele, nonostante i tentativi realizzati sin dagli anni Venti da allievi come Max Eitingon di impiantarvi una scuola freudiana. Ma questa è un' altra storia. Paolo Di Stefano




"There is a guy on IMC named Ender who seems very disturbed by this Freud's Letter and he runs after me along every IMCshouting "misinformation " "misinformation" . It's very easy to verify immediatly: the Letter is published on the web "Freud Museum London"
E-Mail adress : http://www.freud.org.uk/Freudtoday.html"





Fraud not Freud
by Ender Monday July 07, 2003 at 10:18 AM

Big discussion about it on NYC IMC - eventualy they took the post down since it is misinformation all the way to the UK site.


My later Message, on other site to Ender

add your comments

(To Ender
by L.S Monday July 07, 2003 at 12:35 PM

Eh! Ender,
It's fascinating! You run after me along every IMC.
This Freud's letter seems to disturb you very much.Freud always disturb, you are not the first.
What is your culture ? You don't know the Freud Museum London?
Need you some help to find this letter ?
I give you the E-Mail adress once more :  http://www.freud.org.uk/Freudtoday.html
Please , verify immediatly. Where is misinformation ? On my side or on your's
L.S





L. S.


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech