Arrest the president now!

Enough 9/11 evidence exists to hang Bush, imprison thousands

(Will the U.S.A. survive this crisis?)

By John Kaminski
 skylax@comcast.net
9-19-03

On September 11, 2001, the most infamous day in American history,
the
tallest buildings in New York were not knocked down by airplanes
hijacked by
Arabs — they were destroyed by demolition charges.

This is no longer wild conspiracy theory — it is a series of
provable
facts, deftly presented on a website that every American should not
only
read but
possibly memorize, so they can repeat it verbatim to every law
enforcement
officer in the country. The web site is located here.

 http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/

Briefly synopsized, the site outlines a terrifying proposition: if
the
collapse of the Twin Towers were caused by demolition, the entire
official
story
about that sad day collapses like the house of evil cards so many
Americans
and people around the world already suspect it is.

The site, WTC7.net, backs up its conclusions with a devastating
play-by-play of what actually happened on 9/11, and what could not
possibly
have
happened according to universally accepted engineering principles.

The official story collapses under scrutiny, the site insists. It
lists
five stunning assertions:

1. Fires have never destroyed steel buildings.
2. The collapses were not investigated.
3. The physical evidence was destroyed.
4. The official explanations are ludicrous.
5. The evidence indicates demolition.
6. Demolition is provable.

No steel high-rise building has ever collapsed due to fire, the
site
insists. And on 9/11, three of them collapsed in a matter of hours at
the
World
Trade Center complex.

The total collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were (based
on the
official story) the three largest engineering failures in the history
of the
world, yet no federal investigation was ever funded.

The evidence of the collapses was quickly destroyed. A series of
explanations was promoted to explain the collapses, but each is
ridiculed
and
debunked on the site, including killer fires, column failure, and truss
failure. The
site's conclusion: official explanations cannot explain any kind of
total
collapse.

Other curious phenomena examined were the fires that burned for 100
days,
that concrete was curiously pulverized in mid-air, and that the
buildings
fell so quickly despite following the path of most resistance, among
other
suspicious aspects.

After presenting its evidence, the site concludes the towers were
deliberately demolished. Which means the disaster could not possibly
have
been the
work of Osama bin Laden.

The implications of the story on this site are enormous. They mean
that
the official story told by George W. Bush's American government is a
total
fabrication. There is no evidence against Osama bin Laden if the
buildings
were
demolished. It has all been a lie.

What this means is that George W. Bush is guilty of complicity to
the
most heinous crime in American history, the willful murder of more than
3,000
people and the destruction of a significant part of America's biggest
city.
And
of course treason. There is no space to delineate here all the other
charges
of mass murder and obstruction of justice against this vain little
demagogue
who stole the U.S. presidency and now is raping the world.

Also guilty are Vice President Cheney and the entire Cabinet, the
chiefs
of staff of the armed forces, and many other members of the
legislative,
executive and judicial branches of the government, plus many other
federal
and
military employees, plus many state and federal regulatory officials
and
private
citizens who were either friends of the Bush conspiracy or conspired in
its
cover-up.

And perhaps the biggest problem is that also guilty of complicity
in
this
tangled mess is the federal Justice Department, whose leader John
Ashcroft
was appointed by the principal defendant in this case.

America and the world have never faced such a colossal crisis, and
that
is no overstatement.

The entire American government is now a criminal defendant in the
mass
murder of its own citizens at the very moment the entire world is
cringing
in
fear at America's new policy of preemptive war that threatens every
sovereign
nation on the planet.

It's true, my friends, although it's something you already knew —
outlaws
rule the world, and they own the cops, the army and the courts, not to
mention all the legislatures.

How can America and the world possibly deal with this?

Well, for starters, the state of New York must assume the lead
role,
because all federal agencies, including the FBI, CIA and FEMA, are now
all
possible defendants in what will be the most amazing trial in history.
Of
course,
state officials are as likely to be corrupted as federal officials, but
this
still seems to be the logical solution, at least to begin with.

What is at stake here, among so many other items, is the
relationship of
the states to the federal government. To say this is a profound
Constitutional crisis is a severe understatement.

And the larger question becomes, can the people ever trust their
government again? The quick answer, at least, is ... not this
government —
ever again.

But first, everyone must get the word out. Every American, or as
many
as
possible who aren't immediately felled by terminal apoplexy as they
confront
this material, should read the sequence of events as presented on this
site.

Then, responsible people in many professions should confer as to
the
best
way to deal with prosecutions on these charges, including how to
suspend the
functional legal legitimacy of the Bush administration, especially
since
this
group seems intent on blowing up the world. Then it will have to be
one
step
at a time with some sort of calmly constructed provisional government,
with
the current Congress most likely having absolutely no role in its
creation.

This is a great and necessary opportunity for the individual states
to
regain some of the power that has been usurped by Washington when they
create a
new federal government without any help from the old one.

OK. I know this is all mind-boggling. Unfortunately for all of
us, it
happens to be reality. Shake off your stunned silence and incredulity.
We
have to deal with it, and we have to deal with it now.

Proper articulation of the offenses, machinery to effect remedies
and
prosecutions — and doing both of these things in the proper venues
— are of
critical importance at this moment. Not being a lawyer, I don't know
what
they
are. Somebody knows. That person or persons needs to speak, and soon.

Because if Bush knows his crimes are exposed and he is allowed to
remain
in power, God knows what will happen.

I know you've taken in a crushing amount of information just now,
but I
would beg you to try and digest a little bit more, this time from the
mind
of
Kent State professor Walter Davis, who has articulated in a very
coherent
way
the argument against George W. Bush continuing as the commander of the
most
deadly arsenal ever seen on this planet.

Read the whole piece at some point at

 http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4582.htm

It's titled "Compelling Evidence for Complicity." Davis points out
the
government has tried to cop a plea of ineptitude in failing to prevent
the
9/11
disaster, but the professor concludes this excuse is "not consistent
with
the
known facts."

With flawless logic and perfect professorial prose, Davis outlines
and
elaborates 22 reasons why he thinks Bush not only knew but helped plan
and
execute the tragic 9/11 deception. Davis's items range from the fact
that
the
entire U.S. intelligence community knew the attack was going to happen
and
the
American air defenses were "stood down" ... to historical precedents of
leaders
who lied about attacks in history. In between is the definitive
version of
the
charges that should be laid upon Bush and all the criminal
functionaries who
participated in this profound crime against the American people.

I seldom say things are a "must read," but this is one of them,
simply
for its articulation of the basic crimes of 9/11 and the completeness
of the
magnitude of the atrocity and its implications. Read the damn thing.
Try
not to
cry.

OK, OK, enough data. It's almost 4 a.m. and I've been up since 7
a.m.
after being up til 3 a.m. the night before dealing with my e-mail, from
all
of
you, my lovelies, who are getting this one.

I'm running out of time, as some of you know, and may not be able
to do
too many more of these missives. But this one is important, so I'm
going to
stay up til dawn punching in the addresses. Because you're running out
of
time,
too. We're all running out of time, and we better do something fast.

The information contained in here is a critical step in the right
direction. Take it and run with it.

Fasten your seatbelts, ladies and gentlemen. As you probably
already
know, with the Saudis reportedly aiming weapons at Israel and China and
Russia
viewing the pathetic U.S. military performance in Iraq and Afghanistan
with
an
eye toward maybe taking a cheap but well-deserved shot at the U.S. for
its
insane and murderous policies of late, all of us are going to be in for
a
very
rough ride. In fact, you can be assured that many of us are not going
to
make it
through these next few months and years, but we have no choice but to
try
and
fix this problem as best we can if anybody is to have any hope of
surviving.


John Kaminski is the author of "America's Autopsy Report," a
collection
of his Internet essays. For more information on how to purchase this
book,
click
 http://www.johnkaminski.com/

 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/091703_not_one_night.html

 http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0339/hentoff.php

Why not destroy the towers on a Saturday fternoon, therefore maximising deaths amongst foreign tourists and getting more countries involved with the "war on terror"?

Why the planes at the Pentagon and the one that crashed in a field?

Could large quantities of kerosene and a massive updraught not have caused a thermobaric bomb effect which could shatter concrete?

dont they build large steel structures to collapse in on themselves to minimise the effects of collapse?


I dont know any of the answers just adding to the melting pot!

Agnost