With the excuse of Olympic Games the greek Ministry of Culture plans to destroy the surrounding protected area of Acropolis of Athens and valuable antiquities with a construction of a giant glass and metal building in Acropolis buffer zone,area that is protected from UNESCO.
Global Monuments in danger
ArtWatch NewsLetter winter 2004
Activists to launch new drive to press for return of sculptures to Greece
Activists??? will tomorrow launch a new campaign for the return of the Parthenon Marbles from the British Museum to Athens before the summer Olympics, a spokesman for the public relations firm which is coordinating the campaign, Burson Marsteller!!!!, told Reuters yesterday. The campaign, being run by a new pressure group called Marbles Reunited, is based on research showing that some 80 percent of Britons believe the Marbles should be returned. “This is a new campaign. Wednesday is an attempt to move the agenda forward,” the spokesman told Reuters
From Kathimerini News Paper.
But what happen in Athens and especially in Acropolis was published in Art Watch, News Letter 19, Winter 2004.
ArtWatch UK is part of the international monitoring and campaigning organisation ArtWatch International which was founded in 1992 to protect the integrity of works of art from increasingly ambitious and injurious restoration/conservation treatments. We seek, also, to establish a right of access to records of restoration treatments and interventions carried out in publicly supported museums, galleries and other institutions
Letter from Athens
Spiros Kalogeropoulos,member of the Committee for the Salvation of the Acropolis, reports on an archaeological catastrophe in the centre of Athens
Greece’s legal and enduring demand for the return of the Parthenon marbles held by the British Museum has become an excuse for an unbelievable development.
A hole, 15 metres deep and covering 3 acres, has been cut through the centre of a precious archaeological site only 150 metres from the Parthenon itself. It has been dug to provide the foundations and basement for the so-called New Museum of Acropolis – a private, multifunctional glass building with restaurants, bars, lobbies and some space for antiquities. This building has nothing to do with present preparations for the Olympic Games, but is, by serving the narrow interests of cultural privatization, destroying treasures of humanity.
In archaeological science, the most prized sites are those possessing sequential layers of remains that record continuous usage and development over centuries. The archaeological area now under assault, the field of “Makrigianni” (named after the Greek general and hero of the Greek Revolution) comprises a section of ancient Athens showing continuous usage from the prehistoric ages until the 19th century. The scientific importance of this area cannot be overstated. It contains better preserved architectural remnants of the Post Roman and Byzantine period than have been found elsewhere in older excavations in Athens. Complexes of buildings survive with walls as high as 4m. Moreover, the area, itself a part of the protected ancient center of Athens, serves as a crucial buffer zone of, and architectural foil to, the monumental Acropolis complex.
The initial Governmental decision authorising the destruction of this site, has been dubbed “political” by the president of the Central Archaeological Council (C.A.C.), Mrs Mendoni, and others. It was followed largely by silence within Greek society and heavy pressure in all directions for the implementation of the (technically illegal) plans. The World Heritage Committee has called on Greece (through the document WHC -03/27.COM/7B) to provide information on any development projects which may impact upon the visual integrity of this World Heritage site; to undertake a specific visual impact study, especially concerning the site of the Acropolis; and to prevent any irreversible damage from occurring.
The initial proposal for the site’s development was presented only by pencil drawing and colour coded zones of importance. These graphics addressed only architectural and constructional needs. They failed to give any proper indication of the scale of destruction entailed in the construction of the giant new museum building. Since then, these zonal graphic notations have changed size, color and meaning.
In May, the Supreme Court (of 35 judges) ruled illegal the Culture Ministry’s decision to use the Makrigianni Archaeological field for construction but then withheld announcement of its own decision for 3 months until 16 July 2003. On that very day, an illegal police attack took place on the house of the Committee for the Salvation of the Acropolis (of which I am the…..?). The Court’s delayed announcement allowed bulldozers to work nonstop on the site. When the announcement was finally made, the [?] Minister of Culture, Mr Evangelos Venizelos, simply reformulated the initial (and now illegal) decision into a twinned, alternative proposal, thereby sidestepping the Supreme Court ruling, and permitting the continuation of irreversible damages to the site and its remains.
The so-called “yellow” zone was destroyed even though below its post-Roman and Byzantine antiquities traces of a non-excavated older classical period were found, including mosaics, floors, walls, ovens, casts, ceramics and, it is believed, a sculpture factory of antiquity. Ancient remains kept appearing under the bulldozers even when digging at 20m deep! The “red” zone - which the culture minister designated (publicly and in the Parliament) for the total preservation of antiquities - is now covered by ground in preparation for the drilling of holes 20m deep for the new museum’s foundations (see fig. 1). Classical period walls, baths, mosaics and all other possible layers of earlier cities now face destruction within this zone. This will occur without the permission of the C.A.C. and without any proper evaluation, and publication of, the zone’s important findings as is required by archaeological law.
The monuments on the Acropolis itself are suffering because of the rush to complete the giant new museum building. Documents have proved that “restoration” work on the Acropolis is not really restoration because parts of the monuments are now earmarked for removal to the new museum. International and Greek archaeological rules of restoration demand that all surviving parts of a monument be united - not that some parts be removed to a museum and be replaced by new, inserted fabrications. The Acropolis today looks more like a factory than a designated Global Monument.
In Brussels recently, Greece’s prime minister, Mr. Simitis, asked the U.K.’s Mr. Blair to return the marbles of Parthenon." This generated a lot of publicity and also will be useful during the forthcoming Greek elections". It would seem from this demand, framed in front of cameras, that the matter of the preservation of a Global Monument and its surrounding area serves personal political needs rather than higher cultural principles and duties. Since 1982, UNESCO has held that all parts of Parthenon should be retuned for a proper restoration of the monument itself. Parts of Parthenon are presently found not only in British Museum but scattered around the world in Paris, Rome, Munich, Palermo, Copenhagen etc. It is now more urgent than ever that UNESCO’s decision be activated for the genuine preservation of the Athenian Global Monument as a treasure for all of us.
The International Committee of Monuments and Sites (Icomos) and the members and president, Dr N. Agriantonis, of its Greek Section;
Dr G. Dontas Archaeologist, President of Archaeological Society in Athens;
Dr G.Papathanasopoulos, Archaeological Consultant in the Ministry of Culture and president of the Committee for the excavation of Diros;
Dr D. Skillardi, Archaeologist in the Ministry of Culture;
Dr. N. Alevras, Civil Engineer member of Icomos;
Dr. Th Papathanasopoulos, Architect in the Ministry of Culture;
Mr L.Thanopoulos lawyer;
And, to the many scientists and other people who have helped in many ways.
What exactly has to do the P.R Company Burson Marsteller, it was hired to wash and clean the crime against the global heritage, it was hired to convince the public opinion that this catastrophe is legal and right.
Who is Burson Marsteller?
Reclaim The Streets email@example.com
BURSON-MARSTELLER: PR FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDER
By: Carmelo Ruiz
The public relations (PR) business is one of the fastest growing industries in the global market economy. In order to face perils like labor unions, organized consumer activists and environmental groups, governments and corporations have come to rely more on slick PR campaigns. The peril to popular democracy posed by PR firms should not be underestimated. Using the latest communications technologies and polling techniques, as well as an array of high-level political connections, PR flacks routinely "manage" issues for government and corporate clients and "package" them for public consumption. The result is a "democracy" in which citizens are turned into passive receptacles of "disinfotainment" and "advertorials" and in which critics of the status quo are defined as ignorant meddlers and/or dangerous outsiders.
Burson-Marsteller (B-M) is the world's largest PR firm, with 63 offices in 32 countries and almost $200 million in income in 1994. Although its name is unknown to most people-- even to many in activist circles-- B-M is fast becoming an increasingly important cog in the propaganda machine of the new world order.
Human Rights, Anyone?
On the human rights front, B-M has represented some of the worst violators of our age. These include:
* The Nigerian government during the Biafran war, to discredit reports of genocide.
* The fascist junta that ruled Argentina during the 70's and early 80's, to attract foreign investment. * The totalitarian regime of South Korea, to whitewash the human rights situation there during the 1988 Olympics.
* The Indonesian government, which got into power through a CIA- sponsored bloodbath. (It should be pointed out, however, that B-M denies that it is handling the issue of genocide in East Timor)
* Ideological barriers are no object. B-M also represented the late communist Romanian despot Nicolae Ceaucescu.
* Other third world human rights violators that have been represented by B-M include the governments of Singapore and Sri Lanka.
Doesn't this bother the consciences of B-M's executives? Not at all. Commenting on his firm's work for Argentina's fascists, B-M founder Harold Burson said that "We regard ourselves as working in the business sector for clearcut business and economic objectives. So we had nothing to do with a lot of the things that one reads in the paper about Argentina as regards human rights and other activities".
For years B-M has been involved in major environmental issues all over the world, not hesitating to give polluters a helping hand when confronted by activist groups and/or government regulations. Many transnational corporations have turned to B-M for help in the creation of a pedantic, elitist and corporate-oriented brand of environmentalism. It is the hope of entrepreneurial sectors and neoliberal demagogues that this type of safe and harmless environmental activism will displace the more militant and agressive grassroots groups.
B-M's environmental services have benefited industrial polluters, such as the following:
* Babcock & Wilcox, when its nuclear power plant in Three Mile Island had its famous mishap in 1979.
* Union Carbide, to handle the public relations crisis caused by the Bhopal tragedy in 1984.
* Exxon, to counter the negative press coverage it got in the wake of the Exxon-Valdez oil spill in 1989.
* Ontario Hydro, an industrial concern, headed by Earth Summit secretary general Maurice Strong, which is the biggest source of CO2 emissions in Canada. This corporation is currently selling nuclear reactors to Argentina and Chile.
* The Louisiana-Pacific (L-P) logging company, famous for its union- busting, clear cutting of old growth forests and support for anti- environmental front groups. L-P hopes to convince its employees and the public that ruralunemployment in North America is caused by environmental extremists and opressive government regulation and not by unsustainable logging practices or the relocation of s awmills to low-wage countries like Mexico.
* B-M formed the British Columbia Forest Alliance (BCFA), a Canadian front group which has L-P among its founding members. BCFA is campaigning against restrictions on logging and is actively work ing to smear and discredit environmentalists. Other BCFA members include Mitsubishi and Weyerhaueser.
* B-M is a key player in the nuclear industry lobby. According to Canadian journalist Joyce Nelson, B-M has for years "represented top nuclear power/nuclear weapons contractors such as General Electric, AT&T, McDonnell Douglas, Asea Brown Boveri and Du Pont. In fact, Canada's first Candu [nuclear] reactor sale to Argentina in the early 1970's was later renegotiated during the reign of the military junta, for whom Burson-Marsteller did an image-cleanup from 1976-1981". In addition to this, since 1993 B-M subsidiary Black, Manafort, Stone & Kelly (see sidebar) has been representing Nordion International, a newly-privatised subsidiary of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Canada's state-owned nuclear power company.
* B-M coordinated the oil industry's campaign to discredit and destroy president Clinton's proposal for a BTU tax.
* A B-M executive sits on the board of Keep America Beautiful, a front for the packaging and waste hauling industries that lobbies against mandatory recycling laws, especially the passage of a national bottle bill in the US.
B-M's most powerful and influential 'environmental' client is the Business Council for Sustainable Development (BCSD), an eco-capitalist outfit founded by Swiss banker Stephan Schmidheiny. A leading theorist and advocate of neoliberal dogma and corporate environmentalism, Schmidheiny agressively combines entrepreneurship and statesmanship. He is a board member of NestlE9, and a director and shareholder (5% owner) of B-M client Asea Brown Boveri. BCSD's original task was to act behind the scenes at the 1992 Earth Summit, which was chaired by the current head of B-M client Ontario Hydro Maurice Strong, to neutralize and silence any voices critical of the irresponsible behavior of polluting corporations. In the words of Joyce Nelson, "With the able assistance of public relations giant Burson-Marsteller, a very elite group of business people (including B-M itself) was seemingly able to plan the agenda for the Earth Summit with little interference from NGO's or government leader s". Nowadays BCSD is advocating free markets and unfettered corporate activity as the only salvation of the environment. Its members include the CEO's of Asea Brown Boveri, Browning Ferris Industries, Ciba-Geigy, Dow Chemical, DuPont, BCFA member Mitsubishi, Maurice Strong's Ontario Hydro, Royal Dutch-Shell, and companies from Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Spain, India, Kenya, Nigeria, Thailand and Venezuela.
Dirty Tricks and Front Groups
B-M was hired by the pharmaceutical corporation Eli Lilly and Monsanto subsidiary Nutra Sweet to promote the use of the genetically-engineered synthetic bovine growth hormone rBGH. This hormone, which increases milk output in cows, is strongly opposed by dairy farmers and consumer and environmental activist groups. Their two main arguments are that 1) There is already a milk glut in the US. To bring more of it into the market would depress prices so severely that small dairy farmers would be run out of business; and 2) the use of rBGH has already been linked to severe health problems in cows and to calves born with grotesque birth defects.
B-M's campaign to neutralize the opposition to rBGH included the use of spies to penetrate activist groups. This fact became public when University of Vermont spokesperson Nicola Marro admitted that a mole had been placed in an anti-rBGH ad-hoc group headed by Jeremy Rifkin, a well- known critic of biotechnology and author of several books. Participants in the group singled out a woman named Diane Moser as a suspect. Moser, who attended a Washington DC meeting of the group, avoided small talk and read a paperback during the meeting. Vermont state representative Andrew Christiansen, who a ttended the meeting, told journalist John Dillon that "She said she represented housewives concerned about BGH...I had suspicions immediately. I've never seen anybody with a paperback coming to a me eting like that". When the activists called the number she left in the sign-up sheet, it rang in the Washington DC offices of Burson- Marsteller. B-M executive Timothy Brosnahan acknowledged that Moser was a B-M employee but denied knowing of any snooping on her part.
A freedom of information act (FOIA) request by activists Tim Atwater and John Stauber, who were then with Rural Vermont and the Foundation on Economic Trends respectively, uncovered a broader pattern of espionage against foes of rBGH. Atwater and Stauber's FOIA request uncovered documents of the quasi-governmental, farmer-funded National Dairy Board (NDB), which promotes rBGH. These documents revealed that the NDB hired the PR firm of Creswell, Munsell, Fultz & Zirbel (CMF&Z). This firm is a subsidiary of communications conglomerate Young & Rubicam (Y&R), which happens to be B-M's parent company. Given that Y&R represents rBGH backer Monsanto, Stauber concluded that "The day-to-day work is done out of Burson-Marsteller and CMF&Z. But I'm sure there's overall coordination with Young & Rubicam". Stauber is now editor of PR Watch, a newsletter that provides critical reporting on the PR industry, and is co-author, along with Sheldon Rampton, of Toxic Sludge is Good for You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry (Common Courage Press, 1995).
B-M works for Hydro-Quebec (H-Q) promoting the James Bay 2 project. If the final stages of the construction of James Bay 2 are finished, it will become the most destructive hydroelectric project in the history of North America, disrupting the ecological balance of an area the size of France and permanently displacing the Cree and Inuit indigenous populations in the area. To undermine grassroots opposition to James Bay 2, B-M created a phony group of concerned citizens called the Coalition for Clean and Renewable Energy (CCRE), which was headed by Harvey Schultz, former head of New York City's department of environmental protection. According to John Dillon, "Schultz, Burson-Marsteller, and (CCRE) have hosted briefing sessions for academics, and business and community leaders-- opinion makers who can carry the good word about Hydro-Quebec back to their institutions".
The state of Vermont has proved particularly reluctant to buy electricity from H-Q because of pressure from local activists. In order to counteract this threat, B-M hired the Vermont law firm of Sherman & Kimbell to lobby the state government in favor of electricity purchases from H-Q. This law firm registered as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which requires America n lobbyists to list their foreign clients and how much they're being paid to represent them. However, since B-M itself has refused to register as a foreign agent for H-Q, most of its work for the James Bay 2 project remains a secret.
In 1990 the Mexican government hired B-M to sell NAFTA to the American public, media and politicians. B-M subcontracted this job to one of its subsidiaries, The Brock Group (TBG), a consulting firm that has done work for American Express, Bell Atlantic, Bacardi, Toyota and the Taiwanese government. TBG is headed by former senator, Republican National Committee chairman, US trade representative and labor secretary William Brock. He was certainly qualified for the job. As US trade representative, Brock engineered the Caribbean Basin Initiative and the US-Israel Free Trade Agreement, and began the negotiations that would eventually culminate in the signing of the US-Canada Free Trade Agreement.
William Brock co-chairs the Multilateral Trade Negotiations (MTN) Coalition, which was founded in 1990 to 'educate' the public-- and lobby for--the now-completed Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The coalition's members include American Express, General Motors, IBM, General Electric, Cargill, Citicorp, Procter & Gamble and other companies and trade associations. According to Malaysian activist Martin Khor Kok Peng, the MTN Coalition had a big influence on the 1990 G-7 Summit meeting held in Houston, USA, in which GATT figured prominently. At the Houston Summit, MTN held a high- profile press conference and released a report by an 'eminent persons group' on world trade.
The Contra Connection
One of TBG's top executives happens to be former Miami businessman and ambassador to Venezuela Otto Reich. During the Reagan administration, the Cuban-born Reich headed the US state department's Office of Public Diplomacy (OPD), whose task was to disseminate disinformation about the Sandinistas and discourage reporting critical of the contras. This outfit, whose operations were later found to be illegal by the US General Accounting Office, was staffed with five psychological warfare specialists from the 4th Psychological Operations Group of Fort Bragg. According to John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton, "the OPD...helped spread a scurrilous story that some American reporters had received sexual favors from Sandinista prostitutes in return for writing slanted stories". In 1987, after the US Congress shut down the OPD, congressman Jack Brooks called it "an important cog in the (Reagan) administration's effort to manipulate public opinion and congressional action".
Interestingly enough, the OPD was conceived at an August 1983 meeting between then CIA director William Casey and a small group of PR industry executives. The meeting, whose purpose was to create a propaganda strategy for the Nicaraguan contras, was attended by B-M senior vice- president Kenneth D. Huszar and Philip Morris publicist James Bowling, who later moved to B-M. Their advice to Casey included the creation of a communications function within the White House, a recommendation that led to the creation of the OPD.
B-M, Mexico and the Neoliberal Project
B-M's success in insuring the passage of NAFTA encouraged the Mexican governing elite to retain the firm's services. It now has a luxurious office in the posh Colonia Anzures district on Mexico City that caters to customers like the Council of Businessmen, the National Stockbrokers' Association, the ministry of commerce and industrial development, and the Office of the President of the Republic. In addition to this, B-M parent Young & Rubicam rakes in over $100 million every year from Mexican clients. It is not an exaggeration to say that the credibility of the neoliberal project in the western hemisphere hinges on Mexico. Businessmen, politicians and neoliberal ideologues all over the hemisphere have touted Mexico as a symbol of capitalist success because of its privatization policy and its faithful adherence to the economic formulas prescribed by multilateral development banks (a.k.a. the Bretton Woods institutions). After the massive expenditure of political energy in getting NAFTA passed, business elites in both Mexico and the US are hard-pressed to put on a convincing performance in order to give credibility to future trade agreements. Bringing Guatemala and Chile into NAFTA has already become an agenda item.
However, neoliberal designs for Mexico are endangered by a series of crises, including the blatantly fraudulent elections of 1994, the embarassing collapse of the peso, revelations of drug-related corruption that compromise the Mexican elite all the way up to the president's office, a spate of political assassinations that seems to be beheading the ruling political party's leadership, and the popularity of the EjE9rcito Zapatista de LiberaciF3n Nacional (EZLN). B-M has a lot of work to do in Mexico. In the words of reporter Jon Reed, who investigated B-M's activities in Mexico, "Burson-Marsteller and other Mexican and transnational PR firms have demonstrated their effectiveness by working behind the scenes-- gauging public opinion, counseling government and corporate leaders, shaping media coverage, and facilitating elite-to-elite communications-- in short, guaranteeing that the inevitable upheavals in an authoritarian and unjust society do not interrupt business as usual".
Destroying Health Care
One of NAFTA's most nefarious consequences will be the dismantlement of Canada's government-run health care system. Since it places very strict limits on what domestic or foreign corporations can do, its more progressive features--such as compulsory licensing in order to control drug costs-- will eventually be challenged as barriers to trade. Once the Canadian system is gutted by NAFTA's notoriously secretive and undemocratic dispute resolution mechanisms, Canadian citizens will have no choice but to turn to the 'free market' for medical services and insurance.
However, American and Canadian pharmaceutical and insurance companies that want to crack open the Canadian market are frustrated by the fact that Canadians are very happy with their health care system. Worse yet, more and more Americans, especially in Vermont, are now calling for the introduction of single-payer health insurance in their country--a step in the direction of a Canadian-style system. This presents a grave problem for neoliberal demagogues, since it exposes the basic conflict between capitalism and democracy.
Enter Burson-Marsteller's health care unit, whose staff includes "a medical doctor/physician; former FDA (Food and Drug Administration) commissioner; former hospital administrator; former pharmaceutical communications executives; former non-profit communications chiefs; grassroots specialists, and former reporters" according to the senior editor of O'Dwyer's newsletter, which monitors the PR business.
B-M has plenty of experience in matters of public health. On behalf of client Philip Morris, B-M created the National Smokers' Alliance (NSA) to fight against smoking restrictions. According to John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton, the NSA "is a state-of-the-art campaign that uses full- page newspaper ads, direct telemarketing, paid canvassers, (toll free) numbers and newsletters to bring thousands of smokers into its ranks each week. By 1995 NSA claimed a membership of 3 million smokers". The NSA is headed by B-M vice-president Thomas Humber and its members include B-M executives Pierre Salinger and Kennetz Rietz, as well as Peter Kelly, senior partner of B-M subsidiary Black, Manafort, Stone & Kelly (see sidebar). In addition to this, B-M was hired by the A.H. Robbins company when its Dalkon Shield IUD contraceptive injured thousands of women who used it, and it is now currently promoting the 'virtues' of Eli Lilly's anti-depressant wonder drug Prozac.
The winners of the health care debate in the US were beyond any doubt the pharmeceutical transnational corporations (eleven of which are B-M clients) and the major insurance companies (which include B-M clients Met Life, Equitable Life, Aetna, State Farm and Mutal of Omaha). Now both businesses are vertically integrating themselves into superconglomerates known as health maintenance organizations (HMO's). According to Joyce Nelson, "During 1994 both the pharmaceutical industry and the private insurance industry consolidated into even bigger players on the health care scene, with B-M playing a major role in arranging the mergers among its clients". HMO's are not required to cover all illnesses or people, but can instead discriminate against elderly citizens and/or people with health problems in order to reduce operating costs.
What can we do?
The awesome power of the 'manufactured consent' of the mass media, created in no small part by PR firms like Burson-Marsteller, can be discouraging to many politically aware citizens. However, despair is what the PR business sells: despair from even the smallest possibility of positive social change from below. If we are to believe that organized citizens cannot effectively challenge corporate and government power, then the PR flacks will have truly triumphed. But, as Rampton and Stauber say in their book, "The fact that corporations and governments feel compelled to spend billions of dollars every year manipulating the public is a perverse tribute to human nature and our own moral values".
The author is a Puerto Rican journalist living in Vermont, where he is a guest lecturer and research associate at Goddard College's Institute for Social Ecology.
PR Watch. This quarterly newsletter, edited by John Stauber, provides a progressive and critical perspective on the public relations business. 3318 Gregory Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53711, USA.
Center for Public Integrity. Private Parties: Political Party Leadership in Washington's Mercenary Culture. 1992.
Center for Public Integrity. The Trading Game: Inside Lobbying for the North American Free Trade Agreement. 1993.
Deal, Carl. The Greenpeace Guide to Anti-Environmental Front Groups. Odonian Press, 1993.
Dillon, John. "Burson-Marsteller: Poisoning the Grassroots" Covert Action Quarterly: Spring 1993.
Greenpeace. The Greenpeace Book of Greenwash. 1992.
Khor Kok Peng, Martin. The Uruguay Round and Third World Sovereignty. Third World Network. 1990.
Nelson, Joyce. "The Time of the Hangman" Adbusters: Winter 1989-1990.
Nelson, Joyce. "Burson-Marsteller, Pax Trilateral and the Brundtland Gang vs. The Environment" Covert Action Quarterly: Spring 1993.
Nelson, Joyce. "Dr. Rockefeller Will See You Now" Z Magazine: May 1995.
Nelson, Joyce. "NAFTA's Nuclear Agenda" Z Magazine: June 1995.
Parry, Robert. Fooling America: How Washington Insiders Twist the Truth and Manufacture the Conventional Wisdom. Morrow, 1992.
Rampton, Sheldon & Stauber, John. Toxic Sludge is Good for You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry. Common Courage Press, 1995.
Reed, Jon. "Interview with the Vampire: PR Helps the PRI Drain Mexico Dry" PR Watch: fourth quarter, 1994.
Members of the Committee for the Salvation of the Acropolis