Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Privatisation of council houses in Waverley

Keith Parkins | 17.02.2004 18:19 | Social Struggles

As with many councils across the country, Waverley is following the neo-Labour agenda and offering their council house tenants the choice of privatisation of their homes. No other option is available on the neo-Labour agenda.


'You may wonder why we need to do this. After all, it is not very long - only three and a half years, since the Council asked tenants to vote on whether to transfer all its homes to a newly created housing association.' -- councillor Victor Scrivens, Waverley Housing Portfolio Holder

‘We want to ensure that every tenant who needs his or her home improved has a full opportunity to do that. They have the right to avail themselves of the opportunities of the decent homes programme but if they choose not to then regrettably that’s a matter for them and their local authorities and there’s little that government can do about that.’ -- neo-Labour Housing Minister, Keith Hill

‘You can take a horse to water but you can’t force it to drink.' -- neo-Labour Housing Minister, Keith Hill

'The vote in Camden shows we can win when we organise effective broad based campaigns that give tenants the case against privatisation and for direct investment ... If we can do it so can you. It takes some effort - but it's worth it.' -- Camden DCH


Waverley (Farnham and Godalming south of London in the County of Surrey) are doing what many councils across the country are doing and offering their council tenants a choice of PFI, stock transfer to a Housing Association or transfer to an ALMO (Arms length Management Organisation). It appears to be three choices, but in reality it is one choice, privatisation of council houses.

 http://www.waverley.gov.uk/housingoptions/index.asp

Waverley are one of many councils going through this exercise. Wrexham and North Tyneside, are partway through the exercise, Camden and Guildford have said no, and somewhere around 200 councils are refusing to participate.

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/02/285335.html
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/02/285332.html
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/02/285304.html
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/02/285210.html

Waverley only went through this exercise three and a half years ago, then there was an overwhelming NO vote to transfer to the private sector. Now the tenants are being asked again. It's as a tenant activist from Tower Hamlets (East London) said at a recent meeting in Camden Town Hall to discuss the Camden no vote: they won't accept no, they keep coming back until they get yes, but it is up to us to keep saying no.

Waverley has set up a Special Interest Group to oversee the appraisal. This group is made up of three councillors, three members of the Waverley Tenants Panel and three senior members of staff. As we can see, the tenants are already in a minority, and that assumes the official tenants organisations are acting in the best interests of the tenants, which has not been true elsewhere.

Waverley Tenants Panel has selected a firm of consultants called TACT (Tenants Advice & Consultancy Team) at Dome to act as the independent tenants adviser. Dome 'will provide you with a range of opportunities to find out about the different options and to say what is important to you for your home and your community'. How 'independent' they are and whether their advice is in the best interests of the tenants they are acting for remains to be seen. The experience elsewhere has been that so-called 'independent tenant advisers' are anything but and push the privatisation agenda against the best interests of the tenants.

A 'consultation' exercise will take place during the summer, with the council expected to reach a decision sometime December 2004.

A Housing Association is being formed by Waverley to acquire the transferred stock which would seem to indicate minds have already been made up, and LibDem controlled Waverley is prepared to do Neo-Labour's dirty work for them.

Dome will be arranging a series of roadshows, local meetings and other events around the Waverley area in the next month or so, where no doubt the tenants will be promised new kitchens, bathrooms and the sun will always shine. It is therefore important that activists attend these meetings to ensure truth is told.

If Waverley tenants want to know how bad privatised council housing is, they only have to look north across the county border to Aldershot in Rushmoor, or Ash on the outskirts of Guildford. Rushmoor council tenants voted a decade ago for transfer to Pavilion Housing Association, and have regretted it ever since. If they knew then, what they know now, it would have been a resounding no - repairs are not carried out, yobs are terrorising the estates, tenants who speak out are threatened and intimidated, rents and evictions are rising.

 http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/
 http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/newsletter/issue17/newsletter17.pdf
 http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/newsletter/issue17/part4.htm

The government has recently introduced guidance to Waverley and other councils across the country detailing the minimum standard that they expect council housing to meet by 2010. Many of Waverley's homes were built between 1930 and 1970, which means that the roofs, walls, foundations etc may now need attention. We also know that kitchens and bathrooms need replacing and that many tenants would like replacement double-glazing.

Waverley claims it will not meet the Decent Homes Standard by 2010, because it will cost £16 million more than Waverley has in its coffers or has budgeted for. Therein lies the rub and the blackmail neo-Labour is applying to council tenants. Vote NO, and we will deny you the money to bring your homes up to a decent standard. As defined by the government: A decent home is one that is wind and weather tight, warm and has modern facilities.

Camden council tenants turned down a £283 million bribe when 77% voted NO to privatisation. They are now demanding that money, which was on offer if they voted yes, to be made available to Camden to bring their homes up to a decent standard.

As ex-cabinet member Frank Dobson MP said at the recent Camden Town Hall meeting (10 February 2004), it makes not a jot of difference to PSBR whether the government gives the money to the council or a private company. The only difference is neo-Labour/Thatcher dogma which is intent on destroying our public services and removing democratic accountability.

Whatever assurances may be given prior to privatisation, there is no democratic accountability once the stock is transferred to the private sector. Tenants may sit on the board, but they will not be privy to key decisions or information, cannot convey such information to their fellow tenants, and are legally obliged to act for the company, not the tenants they are elected to represent.

Camden threw nearly £500,000 into a propaganda campaign to force a yes vote, taxpayers money that could have been spent on social housing, and still their council tenants voted by more than 3:1 NO to privatisation. Camden are now demanding the £283 million promised by the government.

Defend Council Housing are demanding a fourth option on the ballot, remain with the council with government financial backing.

But as the three options are in reality one, there is not a fourth option. What we should be demanding is three genuine options: remain with the council, privatisation, or direct tenants control. This gives tenants a real choice, not three varieties of privatisation coupled with threats and blackmail if you refuse to vote for privatisation.

The good news is that councils across the country are voting NO to privatisation, 200 councils are refusing to participate, Defend Council Housing produce masses of good campaign material, Unison has political fund available to fight privatisation of council housing.

Something like 200 councils across the country are sticking two fingers up to Blair, and refusing to choose a privatisation option. At least 130 MPs have signed an EDM (Council Housing Early Day Motion 116) supporting tenants’ demands for direct investment without strings attached. Has your MP signed? A new EDM has been tabled in Parliament - EDM 430 Investment and choice for council tenants. Has your MP signed?

It is a essential that Waverley tenants form their own branch of Defend Council Housing, ask their local Unison branch to obtain funding to finance the campaign, demand equal access for opposing views to be put to council tenants, look to Camden to see how they achieved the 77% NO vote which has left the government's housing policy in disarray, lobby for government funding to be invested directly in council housing with genuine local democratic control and accountability.

Three and a half years ago Waverley overwhelmingly said no to privatisation. If, the initial consultation indicates this is still the view of the overwhelming majority, Waverley should follow the example of Guildford, and say no without the added expense of an unnecessary and expensive ballot.

No matter how bad housing is under the council, and it usually is bad, it gets a whole lot worse once transferred to the private sector - rents go up, rate of repairs go down, tenancies are less secure, evictions go up.

Camden tenants put across eight key points. They formed liaisons with tenants, trade unionists and activists, manned stalls, stuck up posters everywhere, leafleted every tenant, held meetings, targeted every 'consultation' meeting and council meetings, brought in campaigners from outside the area, staged publicity stunts to get massive media coverage etc. And it worked, 77% voted NO to privatisation.

And if Waverley tenants have any remaining doubts, they should look north to Aldershot and see how privatised tenants fare.

If Waverley form their own Housing Association, how long before it is devoured by Pavilion, who are currently devouring smaller Housing Associations across southern England?


Contacts

Peter Sandy (tenant activist Aldershot) 01252 329919
Waverley Housing Dept 0800 0325253
Dome Consultants 0800 919994


web

 http://www.waverley.gov.uk/
 http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/
 http://www.defendcouncilhousing.org.uk/
 http://www.housingcorp.gov.uk/
 http://www.ihos.org.uk/
 http://www.defendcouncilhousing.org.uk/
 http://www.whistleblower.nstemp.com/
 http://bvej.freewebsites.com/
 http://bvej.o-f.com/
 http://www.standardsboard.co.uk/
 http://www.lgo.org.uk/
 http://www.odpm.gov.uk/


reference

The Case for Council Housing (2nd ed), Defend Council Housing, date unknown

Paul Foot, Remember the almo, The Guardian, 21 January 2004

Tom Mack, 'No change' say tenants: Housing stock must stay in council hands, Guildford Times, 14 February 2004

Keith Parkins, Social landlords are deviating from their intended purpose, Indymedia UK, 20 January 2004

Keith Parkins, Camden council house transfer - Camden Town Hall meeting, Indymedia UK, 11 February 2004

Keith Parkins, Guildford say NO to council house transfer, Indymedia UK, 13 February 2004

Keith Parkins, Tyneside - 'forced' transfer of council housing to the private sector, Indymedia UK, 14 February 2004

Keith Parkins, Wrexham - 'forced' privatisation of council housing, Indymedia UK, 14 February 2004

Keith Parkins, A crisis of democracy, to be published

Keith Parkins, Social housing landlords the new corporations, Corporate Watch newsletter No 17, January-February 2004

Keith Parkins, Scandal of social housing on Tyneside and 'forced' transfer to private sector, Corporate Watch, to be published

Residents Defeat Housing Privatisation, Solidarity, Spring 2004

Waverley housing review, Aldershot News, 6 February 2004

Matt Weaver, 'Shockwaves' as tenants veto housing management switch, The Guardian, 9 January 2004

Matt Weaver, Council home defenders urge ministerial rethink, The Guardian, 13 January 2004

Matt Weaver, Camden tenants call government's bluff, The Guardian, 13 January 2004

Matt Weaver, When tenants say no, The Guardian, 16 January 2004



Keith Parkins

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech