Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Ban on the Election Candidature Herritarren Zerrenda in the Basque Country

Basque Observatory of Human Rights | 30.06.2004 14:50 | Analysis | Repression

On 24 April, in Donostia, a group of independent citizens –with no links to any specific political parties or social organisations- presented the initiative called Herritarren Zerrenda, HZ –the Citizens’ List- in order to stand for election to the European Parliament.

The promoters stated that this candidature would represent a left-wing position as well as one favourable to the right to self determination for the Basque Country, but they insisted: «we have no political will to represent any other political agent in Basque society; rather, we intend to offer an option that is open to those citizens who agree with our basic principles».

During the following days, they began collecting signatures. This is a condition set by Spanish election law for any electoral grouping as they are in a different category from political parties due to their being considered as standing for election as a contingent objective, whilst political parties are deemed to intend to last in time, with a permanent structure and organisation.

On May 10, 49,000 signatures were presented, comfortably exceeding the stipulated number of 40,000. After this, the Central Election Board proceeded to officially proclaim the validity of the candidature in the Official State Bulletin (BOE).

On May18, the Spanish government of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero impugned Herritarren Zerrenda’s candidature and the Lawyer of the State filed appeal Nº 1/2204 against the decision by the Election Board to validate the said candidature. In its appeal, the executive challenges the HZ election list on the grounds that 33 of its 54 members are linked to “the complex of Batasuna and/or ETA, the BNLM, Segi or other outlawed organisations” based upon Law 6/2002 of Political Parties. These links are absolutely gratuitous, as none of the candidates is involved in any penal or administrative process that would prove this kind of link. In addition, the Lawyer of the State maintains that the impugned candidature is “but the consequence of the terrorist group ETA’s strategy to act through a two pronged approach in the political-institutional front”. Obviously, a clandestine organisation cannot take part in elections, but what is in fact being argued here is that if ETA considers a given electoral group favourable to its project, the latter can be subject to a ban due to this alone. Furthermore, the appeal adds a determining ideological element in order to establish the link, as according to the State Lawyer, the candidature publicly defines itself as being “from the Basque pro-independence left”. In other words, it comes from the pro-independence and left-wing Basque sociological spectrum, which was never a secret because, to date, it is a legitimate political section of society.

The appeal was sent to the special court known as the Sala 61 (a special court within the Supreme Court with jurisdiction in cases dealing with the validity of political parties according to the Law of Political Parties), in charge of “proceedings to declare political parties illegal and thereby, to declare their disbandment”. This is the same proceeding as the one followed to outlaw Batasuna, HB and EH, as well as to prevent AuB and many local platforms from standing in regional and local elections. The Supreme Court, in a decision dated 21 May 2004, considered that “the activity of outlawed and disbanded political parties may not continue in the future, even under other “legal draping”, categorically stating that the same conclusion to ban all activity would be arrived at as often as the transmission or taking on board, through whichever legal formulae, of the same functional content in an identical or similar distribution of duties with the terrorist group ETA is detected”. It continues to justify this reasoning due to the HZ candidates having taken part in other candidatures and deciding to declare the list “not conforming to the law and to annul the proclamation”.

The reply to appeal Nº 3293/2004 before the Constitutional Court was similar. However, a new element was introduced: condemnation of terrorist actions. Literally, and in a contradictory loop, “whilst expressions of support or rejection, cannot be demanded, by principle, of any citizen, as they must in any case spring from their freedom of speech; in a democratic society, it is perfectly acceptable to expect […] an unequivocal declaration of distance, rejection and condemnation of everything represented by a criminal organisation and its political instruments, from an electoral group […] as soon as a suspicion of connivance with terror looms over it”. In other words, a declaration cannot be demanded, but if it does not take place, at least in whichever terms the courts and the Spanish powers consider appropriate, that omission is “the minimum demand to make of those who wish to use the benefits given by the system the criminals wish to subvert”. Nevertheless, this can hardly be justified, because the main candidate, María Jesús Fullaondo, stated she condemned “all forms of violence that occur in the Basque political context” in the Basque regional Television (EITB) programme “Políticamente Incorrecto”. It would seem this statement is not enough for the high Court. All in all, the Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal due to the silence of the candidature promoters about a circumstance –violent action by a non-state agent- which did not occur during the entire election campaign.

Nevertheless, there are several unanswered points in the decisions by both the high courts as well as several interpretations that clearly violate political principles of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention of Human Rights and its protocols. In principle, there are several procedural issues related to questions about the jurisdiction of the special court in the Supreme Court, the summary nature and speed of the procedure and the physical distance between the courts and the geographic space where the candidature was registered. In addition, a formal issue should be taken into account, this time related to the Constitutional Court itself, according to which, “political parties and electoral groups are not equivalent; they are not even comparable”. Continuity cannot be understood if there are different categories and methods of working.

However, let us concentrate on the specific political rights and public freedoms violated in these proceedings.

This observatory has previously stated its position on the law that is the basis for these proceedings: law 6/2002 of Political Parties, which I Amnesty International’s words includes “vague, indeterminate, broad, extensive […] expressions, abstract concepts, which are difficult to assess legally and which may infringe the right to ideological freedom, freedom of speech, of association and of participation in public business”. Additionally this legislation would also violate the principles of legality and legal security, the principle of proportionality, retroactive application of punitive legislation and an extraordinarily rigid and arbitrarily determined legal procedure.

More specifically, the ban on the HZ candidature is an interference in the exercise of the right to freedom of expression. This interference affects both the physical persons who are candidates, and the candidature itself, which jointly exert the right to communicate information and ideas through their participation in political debate, in electoral debate. But it also constitutes an obstacle to citizens’ freedom of choice and a direct attack on society’s right to freely express opinions and freely choose its representatives before the institutions. This is one of the most serious attacks on the foundations of political democracy itself. The application of these criteria forbids, in a general and absolute manner, the possibility of these “soiled” candidates taking part in elections per secula seculorum, and in fact automatically becomes a reason for total ineligibility, which affects this case and any other future candidature that includes the affected. This can only be deemed a situation of total ideological “apartheid” in which a section of society has no way to exercise its right to active or passive suffrage.

This process is also a clear example of connivance of the judiciary power with the government’s political interests and priorities, once again proving the complete lack of independence between these two powers.

Basque Observatory of Human Rights
- e-mail: info@behatokia.info
- Homepage: http://www.behatokia.info

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech