Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Social Cooperation

The real world | 12.08.2004 14:12

We can never overcome scarcity. But by understanding its implications—opportunity costs, the inevitability of competition and the desirability of cooperation, the need to ration and the importance of choosing at the margin—we can better understand how market economies constantly push back the limits of scarcity

In a nutshell, market economies succeed because they let us make the best use of the information necessary for social cooperation. They do so by allowing that information to be communicated from those who have it to those best able to act on it, with the messages containing this information motivating people to respond appropriately and providing them with the means to do so. Any successful economy has to be a system of messages, motivation and means. And no economic system incorporates these three M's as effectively as the market economy.


Only by directing scarce resources into their highest-value uses can an economy prosper. But there are countless uses for resources, differences of opinion about their value in different uses, and shifting conditions that constantly change a resource's relative scarcity and its value in different uses.

Given the complexities, it would be easy to dismiss the goal of making the most valuable use of our resources as a utopian dream. Somehow, people from all over the world would have to be in constant communication. Consumers would have to constantly send messages, to each other and to producers, on the value they place on the various goods and services that can be produced. Producers would have to send messages, to each other and to consumers, on how productively they can use resources to turn out various goods and services. Communications technology is improving dramatically, but surely we'll never reach the point where everyone can be in constant communication with everyone else.

Even if such an amazing communications network were possible, it couldn't ensure that resources flowed to their most valuable uses. People would not only have to be able to communicate with others constantly, they would also have to communicate accurately. If the messages contain distortions on the value of resources and the goods they produce, there is no possibility that the resources will be used to produce the most value.

What hope is there that individuals will resist the temptation to exaggerate the importance of resources in the uses they favor? Improving communication technology is difficult enough. Ensuring accurate communication is even trickier. But as we will see, market prices do a remarkable job of communicating information accurately.


Ensuring that the economy makes the best use of its resources requires more than accurate communication. It also requires motivating those best able to respond to that information to do so appropriately. For example, if others inform you that they value a good more than you do, responding appropriately means reducing your consumption so they can increase theirs. Or if consumers inform a producer that the resources he is using would be more valuable in another activity, responding appropriately means using less of those resources (perhaps by going out of business) so producers doing a better job of satisfying consumers can use more.

It's unrealistic, of course, to expect people to be as concerned for others as for themselves, their family members and close friends. Concern for others hardly seems strong, widespread and constant enough to get resources directed into their most valuable uses. Yet in our market economy, we come very close to realizing the type of social cooperation needed to do just that. This cooperation is achieved through market prices.

When people want more of a good, they communicate that through their willingness to pay a higher price for it. The higher price does more than inform producers that more of the good is wanted and motivate them to produce more of it. The higher price results in more revenue, which provides those producing the good with the means to produce more of it.

How It Works

Consider a trip to the local store. Everywhere you look are products from around the world—even domestic products require foreign inputs—that are consumed all over the world. Each of them bears a price that communicates information from everyone who contributed to supplying the product and from everyone who consumes it. That price is a message that tells you all you need to know about all those people—almost none of whom you'll ever encounter—to respond appropriately to their various preferences and circumstances, and it motivates you to do so.

For example, the price of bananas—which we'll assume is 49 pence a pound tells you how much another pound of bananas is worth to other consumers.

If people valued another pound by more than 49 pence, they would buy more, which would drive up the price in the short run (the time over which it is impossible to grow more bananas). If they valued another pound by less than 49 pence, they would buy fewer bananas, which would lower the price (again, in the short run).

Their decision on how many bananas to buy is responsive to this price information and feeds back into that information by affecting the price of bananas. It pays consumers to evaluate the marginal value of bananas to them and then buy bananas only to the point where an additional pound is worth 49 pence.

Assume next that for some reason, people in Asia decide they want to eat more bananas, which raises the price to 68 pence a pound. People elsewhere in the world will respond to this price increase by consuming fewer bananas. How many fewer? Just enough fewer to make the additional bananas Asians want to buy at the higher price available to them.

Few, if any, consumers will know why the price went up. Nor will they know where the bananas they would have consumed at the lower price go. But the higher price tells them all they need to know to harmonize their preferences with those of Asians.The consumers who reduce their consumption cannot be expected to care as much about Asian consumers as they do about themselves. But in response to price communication, they are motivated to act as if they do.

Two-Way Communication
When consumers want more bananas, the resulting price increase communicates that fact to banana producers. Given enough time, producers will respond by investing more, working longer and outbidding competitors for the resources needed to produce more bananas.

These responses all require sacrifice. But as long as the value of the sacrifice necessary to get another pound of bananas into stores (marginal cost) is less than the price (marginal value), more bananas will be provided. Producers are not as concerned for banana consumers around the world as they are for themselves and their loved ones. But in response to price communication, they will act as if they are.

On the other hand, if consumers want fewer bananas, they'll send this message with a drop in price. This will encourage the purchase of bananas that are already available. But because the lower price will not cover the marginal cost of producing as many bananas as before, growers will respond to consumers' message by reducing production, with some of the less productive growers possibly going out of business. Producers will act as if they are saying, "Consumers are telling us they value other things that could be produced with the resources we are using by more than they value bananas. Because of this, we will release some of those resources to those who will use them to provide more benefit to consumers." Banana growers don't reduce their production because they care as much about the interests of consumers as they care about their own. But price signals motivate them to act as if they do.

We not only want producers to consider consumer interests when deciding how many bananas to make available. When consumers decide how many to buy, we want them to consider the sacrifices producers are making to grow bananas and transport them to local stores. And because of the two-way communication of market prices, they will. The price of bananas allows producers to communicate to consumers the cost (sacrifice) of making an additional (marginal) pound available in a way that motivates appropriate responses.

Assume, for example, it is discovered that working on banana plantations increases the chances of developing an uncomfortable skin rash. Wages for workers growing and harvesting bananas will rise to help compensate them for this risk. Of course, this raises the marginal cost of banana production, which will be communicated to consumers with a higher price for bananas.

Although consumers may not know the price increased because of the newly discovered risk to banana workers, the higher price will tell them all they need to know to respond as if they did and as if they were as concerned about the well-being of the workers as they are about their own. Consumers will reduce their consumption of bananas until bananas' marginal value to them increases enough to equal the higher marginal cost of producing them.

The Free Market Economy

The communication and cooperation that take place through market prices are the secret to the superior wealth creation of free market economies. British peole aren't richer than people in other countries because they are smarter or work harder. Our population is composed of people from all over the world, so we certainly aren't smarter than people from other countries. And though most of us work hard, we don't work harder than people elsewhere. We are richer than most people because our economy relies more on market prices to harmonize our diverse talents and aspirations.

Nobody would claim that markets work perfectly. But given the magnitude of the task involved, they work amazingly well. Certainly, no other type of economic system comes close.

The real world

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech