Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Heritage Lottery Fund Urban Parks Initiative - Saviour of our historic parks?

Tricia Ross | 26.08.2004 20:28 | Analysis | Ecology | Cambridge

Heritage Lottery Funds Urban Parks Initiative has been responsible for injecting much need cash into our historic urban parks. The benefits are well known but is there a darker side?

HERITAGE LOTTERY FUND URBAN PARKS INITIATIVE - Saviour of our historic parks or is there a darker side - Trees traded for lottery cash!

Heritage Lottery Fund Urban Parks Initiative is the much vaunted way in which cash has been injected into our historic urban parks providing, in the words of promotional literature, a once in a lifetime opportunity to reverse the decline of the last 50 years when cash strapped local authorities have placed parks on a back burner.

We are all aware of the benefits: restoration of historic features, new play areas, paths, plantings and site furniture. What is less well known, however, particularly to the unsuspecting public, is the meaning of ‘landscape restoration’. This invariably involves the felling of significant numbers of mature healthy trees. The reasons given vary but it seems that whenever HLF grants are made trees are felled: trees are either said to be unhealthy or diseased (often on scant evidence), the wrong species, or obscuring the coherence of the original design.

There seems to be no discernible disquiet among professionals as to whether landscape restoration is in the long term interests of parks, and those who use them or crucially whether it is environmentally and ecologically justifiable in the 21st century. Despite assurances from HLF nothing seems to have changed and those whose vested interests are in maintaining the status quo show little enthusiasm to challenge HLF funding criteria. The fact that landscape restoration is treated in the main as a capital project seems to rule out long term tree management and replacement programmes.

Any attempts by local park users to protest are met by reactions which suggest an unwillingness to entertain any sort of debate. Protesters are either patronised as ignorant, lacking the expertise of the professionals or marginalised by being attributed with extreme views they do not possess. It seems that those in Town Halls and indeed HLF themselves will go to almost any length to quash dissent.

The emphasis on heritage as inherently backward looking means that landscape, instead of being viewed as an inheritance to be taken forward and developed in a sensitive and sustainable way, is viewed as something which must be ‘returned’ to how it was when originally laid out. Parks are shorn of their mature trees. There is no acknowledgement that the imperatives of the 21st century are different from those which prevailed 200 or 300 years ago: climatic change, new and potentially devastating viruses, vandalism, damage due to poor maintenance.

Should landscape be viewed in the same way as the restoration of other historic features? Surely when parks and gardens were planted there was never any sense that those who laid them out viewed their work as something which would not change and develop as the years rolled by.

There is little sign of balancing design with the need to preserve and maintain conditions which will enable wildlife to flourish. Ecology and bio diversity are a poor second place. As long as Protected Species Surveys proclaim no adverse impact that is equivalent to a green light. Schemes are primarily design led with too much weight being placed on the historical perspective which saw the design created. This is essential under existing criteria but of little interest to the ordinary park user who values the landscape they see around them and the wildlife it supports far more highly. Whilst park users will tolerate limited felling for design reasons, present levels are unacceptably high.

The over emphasis on landscape restoration is also in many cases selective and perverse, distorting spending priorities so that much needed cash is not spent in ways which will benefit the greatest numbers of park users and meet their needs in the 21st century. Roundhay Park in Leeds has seen the dumbing down of the existing play facility and its replacement by a facility catering for a younger age range - presumably an attempt to discourage use by teens and pre-teens but where does that leave their use of the park?

Demonstrable public support is crucial for a successful HLF bid yet all too often local authorities claim support which does not exist and for which they have little evidence. Council claims are at variance with the groundswell of public opinion. Locals are left perplexed at what is taking place in their name. Early work by protesters at Kings Lynn, the Walks, suggests that the Council run opinion poll results were seriously flawed.

Is no one prepared to voice concerns that far from returning parks to their former glory, money is being squandered on schemes, large components of which have no public support. Tree felling is seen as the worst kind of vandalism, the destruction of the park’s greatest treasure and most valuable resource.

At Roundhay Park in Leeds a survey concluded that the landscape was the park’s most highly rated feature. The historical perspective was neither surveyed (or consequently rated) but that did not stop Leeds City Council from implementing a project involving the felling of 350 trees, the majority of which were healthy with no safety concerns. Campaigners at King’s Lynn, the Walks are fighting plans to fell a total of 244 trees in their Park (with the remaining Avenue trees to follow in 15 years time). This represents approaching a third of the total. However, in a cynical move, the Borough Council for Kings Lynn and West Norfolk has declared that the trees will go whether or not their HLF bid is successful.

A recent report Is the Grass Greener by the government’s architectural and built environment advisors (Cabe) states that despite billions spent in urban regeneration funds and HLF grants to historic parks many public parks are still seen as sad, boring dangerous and unpleasant. It is high time there was an urgent re-evaluation of how HLF money is spent.

Yes, we do want our parks to be beautiful but beauty is not only achieved by tree felling and the re-instatement of grassy swathes. Let us hope that a re-evaluation of HLF funding criteria will take place before the axe has been wielded in urban parks the length and breadth of the land.

What we desperately need is council officials to break ranks and openly discuss the dilemma they face in obtaining much needed funding for restoration within the straight jacket caused by HLF criteria while at the same time placating irate users who feel there has been inadequate consultation and worse still no authority for what is taking place.

Further information on the campaign in Kings Lynn can be found by logging on to their website, www.thewalks.co.uk and the consultants site scottwilson.co.uk/the walks.

I should like to feel that there can be debate on these issues but in the meantime intend to form a pressure group provisionally called Fair Play for Parks to bring together all those who have concerns similar to those I have expressed above. I should welcome hearing from anyone who feels they can help - professionals with relevant expertise and indeed former HLF trustees who can give their perspective on these issues. I should especially like to hear specifics about other HLF projects, the particular concerns raised and the outcomes. Contact me  Tr1shar@hotmail.com.

Tricia Ross






Tricia Ross
- e-mail: Tr1shar@hotmail.com

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. New website — Dave Cooper
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech