Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Open Source poetry - Steal this poem!

Hammer n Tongue | 07.10.2004 15:31 | Free Spaces | Technology | London | Oxford

here's an excellent open source poem - originally penned by the radical Supergirly and performed at the October Hammer and Tongue poetry slam. feel free to adapt, adjust, alter, rewrite and forward forward forward..

please post any new versions below.

Steal This Poem v1.2

This poem is copyleft,
you are free to distribute it, and diffuse it
dismantle it, and abuse it
reproduce it, and improve it 
and use it
for your own ends
and with your own ending 


This is an open source poem
Entering the public domain
Here's the source code, 
the rest remains
for you to shape, stretch and bend
add some salt and pepper if you want
share it out amongst your friends


Because I didn't write this poem, I molded it.
picked up the lines out of a skip and refolded it
as I was walking on over here, 
rescued  leftover ideas,
on their way to landfill,
found screwed up fragments
and found them a use. 


Because, think about it
I can't tell you anything truly new.
There can only be few more new ideas to be thought through. 
So should we treat them as rare commodities, high value oddities?
Probe the arctic reserves and other sensitive ecologies
for new ideas buried deep beneath the permafrost?
hunt them out of the cultures till the cultures are lost?
then suffocate them with patent protection?
No! we should re use and recycle them
Pile our public spaces high with ideas beyond anyone's  imagining..


So I steal a riff here and a rhyme there, 
a verse here and a line there
pass them on around the circle,
roll the words, add a joke
here go on.. have a toke,
does it get you high?
This poem is indebted to Abbie Hoffman, Gil Scott Heron, Jim Thomas and Sarah Jones,
This poem is indebted to all the words I've read and the voices I've known
This poem is a composite of intellect, yours and mine.
This poem is RIPPED OFF! every single time


Because intellectual property is theft 
and piracy our only defence left against the thought police.
when no thought is new
its just rewired, refined, remastered and reproduced
The revolution will be plagiarised 
The revolution will not happen if our ideas are corporatised.
So STEAL THIS POEM
Take it and use it 
for your own ends
and with your own ending

This poem is copyleft,
All rights are reversed


Claire Fauset

Hammer n Tongue
- e-mail: poetry@hammerandtongue.org
- Homepage: http://www.hammerandtongue.org

Comments

Hide the following 15 comments

bollocks

07.10.2004 21:40

if I spend two years writing a book, and everyone promptly photocopies it, I make no money from it. so why should I spend hours and hours on it, for people to take it for free? You wouldn't ask people in MacDonalds to work for free - why should you ask it of me?

sceptic


Would you eat a photocopy of a burger?

08.10.2004 08:55

When someone photocopies your book, you've still got your book. No theft has taken place.

Jon


Loved it

08.10.2004 10:25

This is a great poem, Claire. I woldn't wanna do anything to it, except frame it.

richarddirecttv


poems and songs belong to themselves

08.10.2004 10:53

Song of itself
Let me sing a song for the sake of itself
That doesn't pretend to be anything else
The music is good but it won't bring world peace
But it may just help you find a release
The music won't end disparity of wealth
But it might just make you at peace with yourself

Let me sing a song that's much like myself
It doesn't pretend to be anything but itself
Let me rephrase this and give you a poem
You can add in some words and make it your own
You can place it with your favourite things on a shelf
But never forget it belongs to itself

douglas g a murray
mail e-mail: hairyscotsman2@yahoo.com
- Homepage: http://www.hard-news.co.uk


phtoto copying burgers

08.10.2004 11:05

This is an astonshingly stupid statement. I still have the book - but the value lies not in the printed page but in the arrangement of words on it. I still have the book, but I have no money for all the hours of work spent in research and the physical act of writing. Value lies not only in physical assets. But if you haven't the intelligence to realise that then the book probably wouldn't mean much to you anyway.

sceptic


free software

08.10.2004 11:08

Sceptic is right to ask the question. Quite a lot of people have asked it already and the answer is somewhat complex and has to do with the way making software works.

Before going into that I should explain a bit more about what free software is. Free means free as in freedom, not necessarily as in beer. Free software (sometimes called open source, somewhat inaccurately) works like this:
- I write some code and copyright it.
- I grant anybody the rights to use (for any purpose), study, improve and redistribute the program on the condition that they pass these rights on to anyone who they share it with. This licence is called the GPL. See  http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html for more on free software.

So back to sceptic's question why would anyone bother to do that?

If I want to solve a problem with software say for example I want my PC to be able to talk to a certain type of printer, I may have enough skill to write this program, or enough cash to pay some one to write it for me. My problem is solved. A program like a driver for a printer has little or no financial value (would you pay for it?), so there's not much point in trying to make money off it by keeping it secret. I have no reason /not/ to share the source code, and, who knows, someone out there could even add some extra functionality to it, which I could benefit from. From this perspective it's all about scratching an itch.

Now expand this to programs that you could make money from, say an operating system, or a web server. Why would you do that for free?

Well, as it turns out people have.

A student called Linus Torvalds had an itch that he wanted to scratch back in Finland in the early 90s. He wanted to be able to connect to his university's big mainframe computer with his home PC, and he wanted to learn about how to write operating systems. So he started on a project called Linux, initially just for doing that. He posted the code on the internet and released it under the GPL for people to change and improve and whatever . And they did(see the original posting  http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&th=d161e94858c4c0b9&rnum=9 ).

Linux (  http://www.linux.org/ ) is now one of the most powerful and stable operating systems on the planet, and runs much of the infrastructure of the internet. The webserver that is sending you this page is running Linux as it's operating system. Thousands of people around the world have contributed to it. Millions of people use it directly or indirectly, from students, to governments, to nasa. Similarly, the Apache webserver ( http://www.apache.org/ ) runs around 70% (cf.  http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2004/10/01/october_2004_web_server_survey.html ) of the sites on the internet (many more than Microsoft's IIS webserver). The BIND program ( http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/ ) helps you to connect to websites by turning domain names into numerical addresses that your PC can understand, and so on and so on.

The fact that this is happening presents an extremely potent challenge to traditional capitalist economic analysts. Clearly people aren't doing all this to get paid (though there are opportunities to make money from free software). Perhaps we're actually going to have to grow out of the childish belief in the profit motive as being the sole motivation in human behaviour. Actually people quite like doing things to :
- Make the world a 'better' place
- Solve problems
- Make themselves more popular/respected by their peers.
- Express their creativity

Eric Raymond pondered all this in a book called The Cathedral and The Bazaar, although I don't agree with everything he says he writes well, and assks some important questions. You can check it out at  http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/

Taking it back to the book example, I'd say perhaps some people write books just for money, but more often people write them because they love writing, or they want to have a rant, or they have something to say, or they like thinking of themselves as an author, or they like other people thinking of them as an author.

Sceptic wrote his/her comment without wanting to receive 2p or something for the contribution, and I replied without wanting exclusive world distribution rights or royalties!

ciderpunx


Freedom and intellectual property

08.10.2004 11:56

Good reads on freedom and intellectual property:
 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/
 http://www.oreilly.com/openbook/freedom/

Stallman's mainly talking about software here, but the concepts he outlines apply much more widely to other questions of intellectual property.

PS: I'd rather eat a photocopy of a McDonald's burger than the original. :)

spanner


steal_this_poem.pl V.1.0

08.10.2004 12:55

Here's a perl version (perl is an open source programming language, that's quite good for being poetic).

You can get perl(tested on 5.8.0 on linux) from  http://www.perl.org/get.html if you want to run it.

All it does when run is print out the value of $ending. You can change this by altering the bit between the quotes in the line that reads:
my $ending="The revolution will not be analogue";

See  http://www.perlmonks.org/?node=Perl%20Poetry for other perl poetry.

Have fun ;-)

#!/usr/bin/perl
# steal_this_poem.pl: V.1.0 Perl implementation of
# "steal this poem" by Claire Fauset
# See  http://tinyurl.com/58p8e for original poem
#
# Copyright (C)2004 Charlie Harvey
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
# as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
# 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be
# use_less_, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied
# warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
# PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more
# details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
# License along with this program; if not, write to the Free
# Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
# Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
# Also available on line:  http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html

my $poem = Poem->new("copyleft");
foreach (@your_ends) {
$you = "Free to " .
$poem->distribute() .
$poem->diffuse() .
$poem->dismantle() .
$poem->abuse() .
$poem->reproduce() .
$poem->confuse();
$poem->ending($yours);
}

open (SOURCE, "this_poem");
$public_domain=$poem;
if(exists $you[$want]) {$salt++;$pepper++;};
foreach(my @friends) {$_+=$source;};
$poem{'author'} != $me;
$poem{'moulder'} = $me;
while ($i{'walk'} 0 ? $yes : $no ;
$Poem{'indebted'} .= "Abbie Hoffman" . "Gil Scott Heron" .
"Sarah Jones";
$Poem{'indebted'} .= $me{'words_read'} . $me{'voices_heard'};
$Poem{''} .= $intellect{'composite'} .
$you{'intellect'} .
$me{'intellect'};
$RIPPED_OFF = $Poem;

$intellectual_property == $theft &&
$piracy == $us{'defend'} - $thought_police;
! $thought == $new_thought;
@it = ["rewired","refined","remastered","reproduced"];
$revolution .= "plagarised";
unless ($us{'ideas'}!="corporatised") {$revolution=0};

sub steal_this_poem() {
foreach(@your_ends) {
$you .= $poem->take() . $poem->use();
}
$poem->ending($your_ending);
}

$this_poem = Poem->new("copyleft");
$all_rights=reverse $rights;

my $ending="The revolution will not be analogue";
$poem->ending($ending);

######################################################
package Poem ;
sub new() {
my($class) = shift;
bless {},$class;
}
sub distribute(){}
sub diffuse(){}
sub dismantle(){}
sub abuse() {}
sub reproduce() {}
sub confuse(){}
sub ending() {
my ($self)=shift;
(my ($ending)=shift) ? print $ending . "\n" : 0;
}
sub take(){}

charlie


ooops

08.10.2004 13:13

lost all the formatting. Here's a prettier version:
 http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=397635

charlie


some people still don't get it

08.10.2004 15:32

If you write a book/poem/software/whatever, you are at perfect liberty to give it away free.

Some people are not in that happy position. The 'profit motive' isn't the point - the point is getting paid for your work.

sceptic


Agreed, some people really still don't get it

30.10.2004 06:18

Sceptic, you're assuming that you can only get paid for your work if you lock it up. Do you also believe that "theft" has taken place when someone borrows a book/poem/software/whatever from a public library?

It's perfectly reasonable to insist that no-one else should make money by selling copies of your work, but it's perfectly absurd to insist that you be paid every time someone shares or borrows your idea.

By the way Richard, framing it is an excellent idea. Here's a two-page PDF, with Claire's poem on page 1 and Charlie's perl on page 2.

Jon


On the scarcity of bollocks.

10.03.2005 07:26

Dear Sceptic,

I'll try to answer your "questions". Information like some other privileged goods is nonrivalrous, meaning it is not naturally scarce, unlike burger or car, for example. Property is created mainly for managing access to rivalrous goods. So why is "intellectual property" created? Because it artificially creates scarcity, and thus helps line the pockets of publishers. Read up on history, copyright was invented in England, and lobbied for bay publishers, using authors as an excuse. Authors are "cheated" out of this "property" by boilerplate contracts, that is, all but the luckiest of authors. So, "intellectual property" is not the "natural" state of things, in fact it was unheard of during most of our history.

Another point, burger chefs are not paid royalties, neither are bricklayers, why should you of I be paid such special bonuses? The very word "royalty" suggests special treatment. Why should authors be treated as kings? I am not saying we should not be paid. (I am being paid as we speak to coordinate the production of a couple of free software packages, the developers of these are also being paid.) As a matter of fact, I would rather be paid exactly as a bricklayer would, per item of labour, not per instance of use or copy of my labour. If I have already been paid to make it, let others use it as much as they can. If others can improve their work by imitating mine, I'm glad, hopefully they will let me copy them if I find their work useful. If my work is any good, then perhaps the more people use it, the more I'll be hired.

Lastly, please don't call anyone dumb when they disagree with you. If we all did that, it would not leave room for discussion.

Regards,
Jergas

Jergas
mail e-mail: apwith@yahoo.com
- Homepage: http://linux.ajusco.upn.mx/


The Buddha would have loved your poem

13.06.2005 14:18

The Buddha taught that generousity brings the best karma. Giving starts a flow, a movement in time and space that results at some point further along generates receiveving. Give enough and you posess true wealth, which isn't money piled in a bank but a flow of good things into and out of your life.

I run a creatives site, a non profit co-op and I have noticed time and time again that those who are most generous to others, who support, help and share their resources are the ones who have the most to say, the easist flow of ideas and words.

Maybe because writing/ creating is a form of giving and when you become practised and learn to give easily, generously... in one sense, it becomes easy in many others.

We are the inheritors of a scarcity world, where all the luxuries and many of the necessities were in short supply and being competitive was necessary for survivial.

But now people die from too much food instead of to little and IT plus the Net makes communicating on every level easy with an infinite supply of space for creativity.For writers to hold on too tightly to their words can create a blockage, a constipation of the spirit.

I respect the copyright and creativity of others and always give credits and links; but you can come to my/our site and copy what you want;poems, recipes ideas. If have to you rip me off..you are just proclaiming your own poverty.

Suzi Pritchard
mail e-mail: suzzie_uk@yahoo.com
- Homepage: http://www.dome2.com


Who's Poem is it?

30.01.2006 18:02

You have written the poem. So you were the instrument for putting forth an idea. But does that poem really belong to you??? Do ideas and thoughts belong to someone??????
No. They are for everyone. It is a complement to you if you were the chosen instrument for presenting that idea. But sharing it will only widen you and not deplete you of anything!
If the discoverer of electricity would have patented it, we would be paying so many cents per unit to someone today.....

Sid
mail e-mail: sid_docs@yahoo.com
- Homepage: http://www.ashtophoenix.com


Is this available as audio?

15.06.2006 11:31

Love this poem and was wondering if it was available as mp3 or wav. Id quite like to set it to music.

Dale
mail e-mail: aikighost@gmail.com
- Homepage: http://www.loopcache.com


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech