Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

International Press Institute letter to David Blunkett

zcat | 22.10.2004 09:55 | FBI Server Seizure | Indymedia | Repression

The International Press Institute based in Vienna a global network of editors, leading journalists and media executives issued this on 20th October.

Vienna, 20 October 2004

Your Excellency,

The International Press Institute (IPI), the global network of editors, leading journalists and media executives in over 120 countries, condemns the seizure by the British authorities of two Web servers used by an Internet media organisation.

Based on information provided to IPI, on 7 October, Rackspace Managed
Hosting (RMH), an American Web hosting company with offices in Uxbridge, Middlesex, received a court order instructing it to hand two Web servers over to the British authorities.

The Web servers are used by Indymedia, an international media network that describes itself as “a network of collectively run media outlets for the creation of radical, accurate and passionate tellings of the truth.” With more than 140 Web sites around the world, Indymedia operates without centralised editorial control and encourages users to freely post messages and articles.

RMH, which operates 21 Indymedia Web sites, subsequently complied with the court order causing the immediate closure of the Web sites maintained on the servers. Fortunately, some of the Web sites were able to come back online within 24 hours, while others faced more severe problems, including worries over the retrieval of their media archives.

The hosting company later issued a statement saying that, in complying with the order, RMH was “acting as a good corporate citizen and cooperating with international law enforcement authorities.” On 13 October, the servers were returned, but no explanation was offered for their removal.

Since the day of the seizure, there has been confusion about the reasons for the court order and the identity of those who requested it. In its statement, on 8 October, RMH said it was “acting in compliance with a court order pursuant to a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty.” Contrary to claims that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had initiated the seizure, a claim denied by the FBI, the hosting company said that the “investigation did not arise in the United States.” It also said the court prohibited “Rackspace
from commenting further.”

Although the facts are still far from clear, it now appears that Italian investigating Judge Marina Plazzi ordered the raid after being instructed to examine various postings on one of Indymedia’s Web sites. The judge apparently made an application under a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) signed between the United States and Italy in 1982. By the terms of an MLAT, a country agrees to assist another in investigations relating to such matters as international terrorism, kidnapping and money laundering.

RMH was then issued with a Commissioner’s subpoena under Title 28, United States Code, Section 1782, which provides assistance to foreign and international tribunals. As the Web servers were operated by RMH in the United Kingdom, it is likely that the United States passed on the request via an MLAT signed with the United Kingdom in 1994. The British authorities then seized the servers.

IPI believes that the seizure has considerable ramifications for other media organisations operating around the world, and that it represents a disturbing attempt by the authorities in a number of countries to
distinguish between traditional media organisations and those on the
Internet.

Of primary concern is the fact that Indymedia was neither informed of the reasons for the seizure nor told of those who had instigated it. Fundamental to any judicial system is the principle that those involved in a criminal procedure should have an opportunity to defend themselves against their accusers. Moreover, IPI strongly believes that an individual can only do so if he is fully informed of the allegations ranged against him. In the present case, Indymedia was not informed and, therefore, denied the opportunity to defend itself.

Furthermore, the matter of establishing a defence is especially important in cases where questions of press freedom and freedom of expression arise. As a media organisation, Indymedia should have been able to argue before a court that there were important reasons why it should not have to reveal its sources or be co-opted into providing information to the authorities. Once again, this opportunity was denied to Indymedia because of the suddenness and speed with which the seizure was carried out.

IPI is also worried that it is the very nature of an Internet media
organisation that allowed the authorities to carry out the seizure in this fashion. With the servers owned and operated by a separate non-media company, the authorities chose the path of least resistance and sought the information from the hosting company. However, this action contrasts with the way in which the authorities would handle a similar situation with established media.

In cases where a newspaper or broadcaster was involved it is highly unlikely that the authorities would have initiated the process by going to the newspaper’s printers or to where the broadcaster’s transmission aerials were sited. Instead, the media organisation would have been approached. Again, this was not done in the case of Indymedia.

At a time when both Internet media and Internet users are facing
considerable pressure around the world, particularly from states who have much to fear from the free flow of information, IPI believes that the present case involving countries that normally uphold press freedom has set a worrying precedent not only in distinguishing between certain types of media, but also in the way they are treated by the authorities.

The result is that any media organisation that has a Web site should be deeply concerned that the same or similar procedures could be applied against them.

Another disturbing feature of the case is the use of MLATs. While IPI
acknowledges the importance of international assistance in the area of
crime, the system is open to abuse. IPI is particularly concerned that
“fishing expeditions” for information held by the media will be conducted at the behest of third-party-countries without proper regard to whether the information called for is necessary or crucial to an investigation.

With the above in mind, IPI calls on the government to hold an investigation into the Indymedia case and to conduct wide-ranging discussions on how to safeguard press freedom for Internet media organisations and to ensure that there is no repetition in the future.

We thank you for your attention.

Kind regards,

Johann P. Fritz
Director

zcat

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech