Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Human rights, access to land, environment in Montes Azules, Chiapas, Mexico

Rolf Isar | 23.01.2005 22:25 | Zapatista

The construction of new infrastructure on the one hand and the relocation process of Zapatista settlements on the other, are the new features of the current situation. Whether irreconcilable environmental, corporate, governmental and community interests can confront each other in a non-violent manner remains to be seen.

Human rights, access to land, environment protection and economic interests –the current situation in Montes Azules

It has been a long day on the back of an open truck, for the last two hours we have been going uphill downhill on a shaky forest track, amongst burned trees whose solitary black stumps, covered by bromelia and moss, rise towards the dull, cloudy sky. We pass a loggers' camp, a village, another one where we turn left and reach our destination. Dusk has set in and, together with the dark clouds, it gives the place an uncanny, rather than cosy, impression.
Such was our arrival in *** (sorry, names of places not disclosed at this stage), a new zapatista settlement in the mountains of Las Margaritas, Chiapas, that has been established only a couple of weeks ago. Its inhabitants have abandoned their homes in “Montes Azules”, the single most contentious part of the Mexican state of Chiapas, where a multi-facetted struggle over human rights, access to land, environment protection, and economic interests continues. We have come in order to express our solidarity with the recently dislodged, and to learn about what made them decide to quit. We, that is three international observers participating in a Peace Camp.

MONTES AZULES
We are received by Pedro (name changed) and his wife and their seven children. The house seems incomplete, a roof and two walls, a third one improvised with iron sheets, the front side is open. To the back wall maize is piled up in bags. There are hamacs for three, the others will spend the cold and damp night cuddled on the floor boards under woollen blankets. There is electricity provided by solar cell and car battery, a fire warms up people and tortillas. Soon supper is ready, beans and eggs, we contribute some rice. While eating, we start talking.
We learn that a mere five families live in this new village that is going to bear the same name like the old one. Most of the once nearly 30 families who used to live there have joined the government camp and have been provided with new accommodation elsewhere. The remaining six families were confronted with an eviction order as of October 31, after which they would have been forcefully removed. On October 25 five of them moved to this new place.
This is the preliminary result of a long-standing succession of threats and evictions. In the year 2003 soldiers showed up in *** and raided at least one other zapatista community. In ***, only the presence of international observers and the well-organised response of the inhabitants prevented the worst. Other communities are facing a similar situation.
Montes Azules is part of the Selva Lacandona, a vast expanse of tropical forest along the Guatemalan border, characterised by an outstanding biodiversity. Since the 1950s landless peasant families exploited or evicted elsewhere have settled here. In the late 1970s Montes Azules was declared a biosphere reserve. The decline of logging, cattle breeding and plantations gave way to new kinds of economic interest. The Zapatista uprising of 1994 was followed by a new phase of violence against indigenous communities, elements of which will be described below:
The militarisation and paramilitarisation known in other parts of the Zapatista area is modified here by the presence of the Lacandones indigenous group. Recently the "Moscamed" programme, officially designed to combat the Mediterranean fruit fly, has once again been blamed by Zapatista inhabitants of the Selva Lacandona as merely another element of low-intensity warfare.


LOW-INTENSITY WARFARE IN S.L.
Commercial interests in Chiapas have established a "tradition" of private armies in order to defend the land they grabbed as plantations or for logging, and subdue their workforce. Likewise, displacement further into the jungle has got a long history here. The case of *** is a prime example for its continuation. Its inhabitants had been compelled to move there only three years ago in search of land.
In August 2002 the federal government announced that all settlements in Montes Azules would be removed. After years of enormous military presence in the Zapatista territory, the new government of Vicente Fox has, since 2001, insignificantly reduced the number of military camps in the area as a sign of good will in response to Zapatista demands to reopen peace negotiations. The actual number of troops, however, remain more or less the same, as, for instance, the Junta del Buen Gobierno in charge of the Montes Azules area confirms. The new strategy is drawing a circle around, rather than permanently penetrating the region. Army camps concentrate on the edge of Montes Azules.
Meanwhile, other methods of low intensity warfare have been employed. Intimidations and attacks are carried out by forces other than the army, e.g. members of the Lacandon community. "They came once in a while, brandishing sticks, machetes and even guns", reported one *** settler.
The Lacandones are a small indigenous community inhabiting the Selva Lacandona. In 1972 a Presidential decree handed over a large part of the Selva, including the eventual biosphere reserve, to some Lacandones families. Tourists and observes are encouraged to believe that they are the only legitimate dwellers in the Selva, and the only ones whose "tradition" enables them to live in harmony with their natural environment (as opposed to all other settlers, whose farming practices are allegedly harmful to the ecosystem). Thus presented as the "Noble Savage", the Lacandones are highly favoured by official sources and encouraged to, even armed for, attacks on neighbouring non-Lacandones communities, especially those of Zapatista affiliation. The Lacandones case should be read as the Chiapas version of the familiar divide-and-rule strategy. Montes Azules is a striking example of how the protection of the environment is used as a cover for human rights violations, the two issues being set against one another. The Lacandones are being used as a vehicle not only for the discursive construction of "good" and "bad" forest dwellers, but also as a violent force seemingly acting on their own behalf, but conveying governmental interests.
In the emerging atmosphere of fear and insecurity, especially the former government party PRI managed to convince many Zapatista supporters to quit the movement and join the government camp. Formerly 100% Zapatista communities are now split, which creates tensions. While the Zapatistas insists the government will do nothing to their advantage, PRIistas in Montes Azules tend to agree to a resettlement on government terms. They usually receive a lot of assistance. However, there are cases of complaint about the food aid consisting in passed maize and vegetables, which made those feeling deceived even turn up at the Centre of Human Rights San Bartolomé de las Casas (Fray Ba).
Meanwhile, Selva inhabitants of all political camps complain about being adversely affected by the Moscamed operations. Moscamed is a joint programme of the US, Mexican and Guatemalan governments started as early as 1977, in order to eradicate the Mediterranean fruit fly in these countries. To this end, a variety of measures have been and continue to be used, including the aerial spraying with pesticides and the dropping of sterilised mail larvae, as well as animals like insects, worms, rats and snakes who are supposed to feed on the fly in various stages of its life cycle.
The benefactors of this are large commercial fruit producers, both in the USA (where the fruit fly is to be prevented from invading in the first place) and in Mexico (where fruit fly-infected produce inhibits access to the US market). Seemingly the fly is abundant in Guatemala, with Southern Mexico prone to be infected. The purpose of Moscamed operations along the Mexico-Guatemala border - a region without commercial export-oriented fruit production worth mentioning - is to create a fruit fly-free buffer zone. Apart from the fact that the whole idea of spilling toxics and alien species of animals over a whole region in order to combat a single type of pest is all but outrageous, the communities bearing the consequences of this can expect no benefit whatsoever. Various communities, Zapatista and non- Zapatista alike, have reported damage to pastures, livestock, coffee plantations, as well as the emergence of a worm entering the skin of cattle, dogs and children, and a general decline in food production and living conditions, as a result of Moscamed. Such complaints have occurred in waves since the 1980s, leading to temporary suspensions and modifications of the programme. Recently, the situation has worsened once again.
The communities denounce that they have neither benefits to expect nor any say in decision-making on Moscamed. This, together with the concentration in the contentious Selva Lacandona makes Zapatista communities suspect that the fruit fly is all but a pretext for a programme designed to make them abandon their villages in the face of deteriorating living conditions. “The aim is to ruin our crops and scare us. Few people have actually seen those aircraft, they usually operate during misty morning hours”, Pedro tells us. The application of such drastic pest prevention measures in the vicinity of, if not within, a protected ecosystem like M.A. gives some credit to this point of view.
After supper we move on to the church, at the same time an assembly hall. Here we meet with all the villagers. Our questions are translated into Tzotzil. We ask for the pressure they experienced before they eventually moved here. Nobody is keen on this topic, it seems. We ask no further. In the year 2004, unlike the previous one, organisations like Fray Ba counted no major attacks, but the intimidations and threats of violence continue. The federal and state governments are resolved to clear the Montes Azules area of all non-Lacandones human settlements. What are the reasons for this?

ECONOMIC INTERESTS
The Selva Lacandona is believed to harbour enormous reserves of crude oil. The oil industry with its usually devastating effects seems a rather "traditional" economic sector. Recent developments, on the other hand, make way for a reconciliation of genuine environmental protection and the generation of profits. The biotech "revolution" has put a price tag on nature, i.e. biodiversity. In this regard, the extraction of Montes Azules's riches is expected to create huge profits in the near future. This makes the conservation of the ecosystem in its current state mandatory.
Alongside, "ecotourism" has become a keyword in the tourism sector both worldwide and in Chiapas. The notion of "ecotourism" combines, in varying degrees, the ideas of tourism within nature, without destruction of nature, and in favour of nature, i.e. by providing funds for its protection. More often than not, a local population living in harmony with, and forming a part of, the environment, is involved. Tour operators in San Cristóbal de las Casas offer trips to the Selva, including an overnight stay in what is dubbed in leaflets "an Indian village". Unsurprisingly, it turns out to be a Lacandones settlement.
Only if seen in this light, the construction of new access roads to the Selva Lacandona makes any sense. A new bridge across Río Lacantún currently receives public attention, especially in Zapatista communities in the area (La Jornada, December 2004). Given the intention to evict all population except few, the purpose of this bridge (and another at the other side of Montes Azules) cannot be to link forest communities - who are not supposed to be there.
All the above has to be understood in the context of comprehensive global and regional economic schemes, such as the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the Northern American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the planned Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) and, Plan Puebla Panamá (PPP). In Chiapas, the human rights question has always primarily been a land question. In the face of corporate interests, collective land titles for indigenous communities are regarded by the Zapatistas as the only means to ensure their cultural freedom and tenure security. However, NAFTA and PPP, apart from devastating effects on the terms of trade of peasant farmers, are entirely opposed to collective land rights and, by implication, indigenous self-determination based on collectivity. Which is why the areas to opened up to economic exploitation need to be emptied from oppositional indigenous populations.

THE EZLN’S RESPONSE
The Zapatista struggle has always been connected to these larger economic developments. It was no coincidence that the armed struggle began on the day the NAFTA agreement came into force. On the local level, in a communique of October 2004, addressed to "the Mexican people and the national and international civil society", the comandancia general of the EZLN points out that the dispersal of the Zapatista communities in the M.A. area deprives them of many fruits of the Zapatista process. Therefore, a number of these communities are going to be regrouped in a single location. The concentration of the communities is also expected to facilitate resistance against ongoing threats and intimidations. Eight villages comprising fifty families are mentioned in the declaration. However, this requires enormous logistical efforts and sufficient funds, and will be carried out step by step over several months. The process has, according to Fray Ba, already begun. Support groups and observers took it the relocation would take place within Selva Lacandona, if not indeed within the biosphere reserve. The case of ***, apparently triggered by the immediate threat of eviction, to a place far from there contradicts this view. It is far from clear at the moment whether the regrouping of Zapatista communities is a negotiated withdrawal from Montes Azules or a fortification of resistance.

PERSPECTIVES
We close the meeting as we realise that most people have said what they had to say and get tired. Over a mug of coffee we continue chatting in a relaxed atmosphere, share jokes, fail to find the place on our map, where not even the road is depicted.
Next to the new village is another Zapatista settlement of four families, and beyond that an "official" village inhabited by PRI supporters. The place is a former ranch whose owner ran away in fear from the 1994 armed struggle. It was occupied and purchased by the EZLN. But of what kind of land is it? We are in the highland, bananas and sugar cane don't grow here, it is cold, unusually so for these five families from the tropical lowland. What is to become their milpas is, for the time being, a pine forest on a penurious soil hardly sufficient for subsistence, let alone selling cash crops. The maize they were able to bring here will be sufficient for six months, with next year's harvest due in September. Over four months without maize reserves will have to be dealt with. In the comunicado quoted above, the EZLN asks the civil society for assistance for this and other villages due to be relocated.
Pedro is thankful for the assistance of the Junta - who has enabled us to visit this place - in terms of provision of land, transport, wooden boards to build houses. Contact to the Junta is said to be excellent given the enormous distances. The relationship with the PRIistas in the neighbourhood is reported to be friendly, the Zapatistas visit their shops and they come over to sell goods, there are no threats any longer. Most important of all, however, is the fact that this land is Zapatista land and cannot be alienated. In spite of the otherwise harsh conditions, this is something to build on.
At daybreak, after a night spent freezing in the church, and breakfast with Pedro's family, we take off, with a sense that external solidarity means a lot to these people. While we are being shaken on the truck advancing on the bumpy road, the sun comes up and penetrates the mist and dissolves it, leaving its remains hanging in the deeper parts of the valleys. As if to bid farewell, the landscape presents its overwhelmingly beautiful side, no longer appearing as hostile as the night before.
In Chiapas on December 31, not only the New Year is celebrated. It is also the anniversary of the uprising. In spite of all the difficulties, this year the people of *** whose territory is available only because of the struggle, had every reason for a party. As for Montes Azules, the construction of new infrastructure on the one hand and the relocation process of Zapatista settlements on the other, are the new features of the current situation. Whether irreconcilable environmental, corporate, governmental and community interests can confront each other in a non-violent manner remains to be seen.


N.B.
Meanwhile, as of 20th of January, the construction of *** is complete. And a second village is preparing to move to a new location.

Rolf Isar

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech