Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Amnesty Interventional

Jigger | 13.02.2005 22:01 | Anti-militarism | Social Struggles

At the National Conference on April 8-10 2005, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL UK will discuss 'whether to offer support to armed interventions'!

People in general, and especially Amnesty members, may find it deeply disturbing that Amnesty UK is discussing the ‘possibility’ of offering support for ‘certain’ armed interventions. This is absurd— a bit like The Vegetarian Society discussing whether to eat meat ‘on certain occasions’. It breaches a fundamental point of principle.

Whatever one's personal views on armed interventions, Amnesty is, and must remain, a neutral NGO or it leaves itself completely compromised, wide open to corruption and political manipulation. It is also obscure exactly who in Amnesty proposed such an idea, and why there is no information on this available at AIUK online, for example. There are no almost no other sources outlining this key motion, due for ‘discussion’ at the National Conference in April. I therefore appeal to all Amnesty members and supporters to spread the word and get strong opposition delegates selected through the regional groups for the National Conference NOW, or it may be railroaded through with catastrophic consequences.

Jigger

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Bumper stickers do not stop genocides

14.02.2005 09:19

I think there is at least an argument to be heard for sending in armed UN Peacekeepers to defend groups who are being subjected to systematic genocide.

If people are being murdered in their tens-of-thousands by armed militias, we're hardly going to stop the holocuast with witty t-shirts and a colourful info-pack. And, if UN Peacekeeprs are necessary, and they are deployed lawfully, accountably and under international scrutiny, then it makes no sense for Amnesty not to support the measure.

I think a very strong argument can be made that it is more morally problematic to remain "neutral" when faced with a genocide-in-progress. Of course, Amnesty will need to be reminded that if they do support armed intervention in certain circumstances, they will have a duty to monitor and report on the UN Peacekeepers too.

Qwerty


Bumper Stickers My...

15.02.2005 00:42

Qwerty, you've really got it all wrong. As I stated in my article first time round, there will be strong arguments for and against military intervention in certain circumstances until Doomsday (probably sooner than later the world is going). The point I am making is this: supporting one side in an armed conflict is not within Amnesty's remit and can never be, and furthermore leads the organisation wide open to corruption and political manipulation. This is an issue for the UN and other bodies to decide on, not Amnesty. Amnesty can only monitor all sides, equally, as to their observance of human rights and correct behaviour under the Geneva conventions. Plump down on one side and its values become worthless. We can all have our own opinions on an ongoing struggle, but Amnesty cannot take one side or another. Imagine, for example, that Amnesty had supported the invasion of Iraq in 2003 due to the wholescale human rights infringements by Saddam Hussein? Where would that have left the organisation now, in the light of Abu Ghraib and Falluja? Redundant, that's where - a used up cosmetic in someone else's power game. This is the point to keep in mind, not a dull, pathetic 'pacifism vs militarism' one.

The Amnesty AGM is in London on the 8-10th of April 2005. Many, many members are unaware of this motion, even now. There is NO information about it at the website, and very little elsewhere. You won't be able to find out ANYTHING about the national conference even, unless you know the page. However, you can go direct to:

 http://www.amnesty.org.uk/members/natconf/2005/

You can also write a letter for publishing in Amnesty Magazine UK. Write to:

 journal@amnesty.org.uk

Ms Maggie Paterson
Editor
UK Amnesty Magazine
99-119 Rosebery Avenue
London
EC1R 4RE

It is crucial that Amnesty members get active and arrest this dubious manoeuvre in its tracks. You can attend the conference AND VOTE just as a member.

Jigger


More info

15.02.2005 09:16

But surely the pointis that the intervention in Iraq was very legally dubious from an internationa law stand-point. From your original post, it doesn't seem to suggest that the motion will be proposing that Amnesty "take sides in a conflict", only that under certain circumstances Amnesty might support the lawful intervention of UN Peacekeepers.

I would agree whole-heartedly with you that in any conflict, Amnesty should remain neutral, but what should they do in a case where a government or militia is comitting genocide against civilian populations? Should they then support the sending in of international Peacekeepers (after due process of law) or not?

Even if they did support the sending in of UN Peacekeeprs, that would not mean that they shouldn't still monitor and report on the behaviour and conduct of those troops.

It's hard to make a judgement based solely on your posting though, do you have the text of the actual motion?

Qwerty


More on the Amnesty proposals

15.02.2005 17:33

Hello again, Qwerty. Alas I have no wording of the motion, as all this is being kept under wraps from the membership. Going by past experience of Amnesty motions, it may not be available to the public until just before the Conference. Of course it all may, as you point out, be quite innocent. The fact that we don't know is not helping matters. One asks, why are the details of such an important proposed change obscured from the view of the general public and grass roots Amnesty activists? Added to this is the choice of language in the few leaks that we are getting, which does not bode well. The terms 'under pressure' and 'humanitarian intervention' in the extract below I think are give aways. This implies that officials within Amnesty are tailoring their 'response' to the question rather more to the pressures of power groups, than to popular demand. Read this:

"Did you know that Amnesty International (AI) currently takes no position on the use of armed force? Well, this stance is now under review. Virtually every armed conflict leads to violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. Invariably people lose their lives and casualties are overwhelmingly civilian. The question is how we can stay silent when we know that a conflict will cause the loss of innocent lives and the violation of human rights? On the other hand how can we not support military action when it is perhaps the only way to halt massive human suffering? In recent years, AI has come under pressure to support ‘humanitarian intervention’. Some have also criticised us for not opposing invasions that are apparently at odds with international law. Against this background of pressure and debate AI’s 2003 International Council Meeting (ICM) – AI’s ultimate decision-making body – called for a review of our position on the use of armed force." From an AIUK February newsletter.

I don't think there's any question that Amnesty should not approve legal UN intervention to prevent genocide. Yet sadly, this laudable intervention type arises so infrequently in the 'real world' of callous power politics that it cannot be the driving force behind the 'pressure' to change AI's constitution. Far more likely requests for AI 'support' will come from unilateral, ad hoc or dubiously multilateral forces that claim 'genocide' or other atrocities in an emotive fanfare of pre-invasion publicity and media coverage. This is the moment when Amnesty top brass could easily be 'pressured' (as they've already admitted they're susceptible to) and become, wittingly or unwittingly, a fig leaf for political expedience. And if this occurs just once, then it will be the instant kiss of death for Amnesty International as an independent organisation. That's one hell of a risk.

Jigger


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech