Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

London Bombings - An Inside Job

Fred | 10.07.2005 17:57 | Analysis

What really happened?

Confusion and Contradiction: What Really Happened In London?

Steve Watson | July 08 2005

Yesterday morning, just as I was preparing breakfast in my North London home, my phone rang and my plans for the day radically altered. The voice on the other end was a very familiar one telling me that she had had to evacuate her train at Kings Cross Station and had heard a very load explosion just seconds earlier. She was confused and wanted me to clarify what was happening by turning on the TV.

Instinctively switching to the BBC, the bold headline read "POWER SURGES ON LONDON UNDERGROUND" and the scene was crawling with police, emergency services and people evacuating the station. I immediately knew what was really going on and told her that there were almost certainly bombs on the tubes and that she should get away from the station.

How did I know this? Because for weeks and months I have watched as the fearmongering in London has risen. I have analyzed the Stasi-like "anti-terror"campaigns, the fake and sometimes unannounced terror drills, the house arrests where all are subsequently released, the press conferences where The Police Commissioner and the Mayor have explicitly told us we would be attacked soon and there's nothing we could do about it.

I have rode on the tube at the rush hour as people nervously pack onto the trains and try not to reveal their anxiety. I have witnessed the antiwar marches and the NO ID campaigns, the tension that surrounded the general election in London, the Live 8 circus and the Olympics farce. I have spoken to Londoners on a daily basis and I have felt the tension rise in this city to a point where we were prepared to be shown the feature presentation, "ATTACK ON LONDON"

So I put the call in to my brother and we were covering the incident, trawling the news wires, watching the live broadcasts within minutes of the first explosion, because that's what we do. We have watched relentlessly as the official story has been pieced together, and this looks, smells and tastes like another government operation. Already, within hours, there are multiple inconsistencies and contradictions which must be highlighted now before they disappear down the memory hole.

ADVANCE INTELLIGENCE

The first inconsistency to emerge, and to date the most compelling, is that of advance warning and prior knowledge. The police and the government have said unequivocally that there was no advance warning or indicative intelligence and that the attacks came "out of the blue". Yet early AP and Israeli radio reports clearly stated that Scotland Yard had given warning to the Israeli Embassy in London that an attack was imminent BEFORE any explosions had taken place.




Screen grab from the Israeli National News. The report is still online here


The Israeli National News quickly went off-line completely after the publication of this story, but has since returned with the original article still available.

The Embassy warned Finance Minister and former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to stay inside his London hotel. For an hour after the first blast, the government and the news media were reporting that the cause was an electrical power surge. If the government knew bombs were going to go off before they did, why did they report for an hour that it was an accident? Were they trying to bide time so they could get their story straight? The same thing happened on 9/11 with the first plane strike.

Both Scotland Yard and the Israelis have since denied that they had any foreknowledge of the attack.

Since the original report, major TV news networks have been completely silent on the Netanyahu story. They are just repeating claims that there was no prior knowledge.

About an hour after the story broke, Associated Press started altering their online news stories, stating that Netanyahu got the warning after the first blast and not before. Haaretz is now reporting the same thing. It seems as if they are scrambling to coordinate their cover story. Either there were no warnings or the warning was after the first blast. The dithering seems to suggest there is some confusion on how to successfully hide the smoking gun, the fact that Netanyahu was warned before the first explosion.

Why didn't the people on the trains and buses get the same warning?


In a further development The Jerusalem post has reported that Israel have ordered their officials not to speak to the media about the bombings, suggesting a lock down on any potential leaks.


DOWNGRADING ALERT LEVEL

On June 7th, MI5 downgraded the London terror alert from its second highest level “severe general” to a lower category of “substantial”. One month before the World's leaders were to gather in Britain, bringing in an influx of protesters and activists, why would this be a logical course of action?

Why did they do this, was somebody lowering the guard

ARMY ON THE STREETS?

Several foreign news reports stated that at 11:20 the Army were dispatched onto the streets of London. If this actually happened, were we under martial law? and why were the British people not informed. I have not heard or seen any eyewitness accounts stating the presence of soldiers on the streets, but no one is denying it occurred either.

MOBILE NETWORK SHUTDOWN?

The Police have said today that the mobile phone networks were not shut down as this would have caused public panic. (The Madrid Bombings were coordinated with the use of mobile phones). "We did consider it. We do have that ability," Blair said. But he said commanders considered how that would affect public confidence, and decided not to do it.

OK so why is the British media reporting that networks were shut down under a program called Access Overload Control , and why could I not make any calls for at least two hours? When the network is busy you get told that it is busy, my calls were instantly intercepted and failed immediately with no such message.

Furthermore, Whilst some "investigators" are saying timers WERE used to detonate the bombs, the Police are saying there is no evidence that timers were used.

REMOVING BODIES OR NOT?

During the same press conference the Police Commissioner also indicated that there were still bodies in the train between Russell Square and Kings Cross that are not yet being retrieved due to dangers of the tunnel collapsing. Yet the BBC had reported minutes earlier that police at the scene were saying they were in the process of carrying out forensic work in that carriage and the bodies were being retrieved. Which is true?

It is clear that the officials are not getting the official story straight.

HOW MANY DEAD?

The police will only go as far as saying at this point that "more than 50" are dead. Of these 50 officially only 2 died on the bus. The scene where the bus was blown apart has been completely cordoned off with screens. It is clear that more than 2 people died on the bus just from the pictures that have been released and the eyewitness accounts, so why are we still being told only 2 people are dead?

The Bombs also "held less than 10 pounds of high explosives" (about rucksack size). Are we to believe that this amount of explosive material on 3 different trains and 1 bus has not killed more than 50 people? The carriages at that time are absolutely packed with people, you have to literally stand nose to nose. I know, I was on a train at that time on the same line just the previous day.

Again the authorities are hiding the real facts, why?

More people are killed in car accidents every week in London than in this "major terror attack" yet the repercussions are likely to vastly bolster the police state grid.

SUICIDE BOMBERS? CCTV?

The media is in a frenzy over whether the bombs were let off by suicide bombers. The Police have said there is no evidence of suicide bombers and that there are many CCTV tapes to trawl through in order to uncover the facts. All London Buses have CCTV cameras on them, why don't they just watch the one video from the one bus that was attacked and find out if there was a suicide bomber?

The answer seems to be that if there were indeed suicide bombers, then the fear level is diminished because the perpetrators are not "still out there" lurking, waiting to strike again.

London has around 4 million surveillance cameras, there are thousands on the underground, yet we are now being told that they are absolutely useless. If they neither prevent such attacks nor help in the aftermath, then what is the point in them?

HOW MANY BOMBS?

Initial reports suggested there were up to 8 bombs on the underground and 3 on buses. This was later scaled back to 3 on the underground and one on a bus. So there were 7 incidents that never actually happened. Police have said that this confusion can be attributed to the fact that people were coming out of different stations. Furthermore the other bus incidents were "controlled explosions". Controlled explosions of what?

Could it be that the attack was supposed to be larger in scale but further incidents failed to make the right impact?

STATEMENT CLAIMING RESPONSIBILITY

The "Al Qaeda" Statement claiming responsibility for the attacks is being hyped by the media. Just like on 9/11 no one has officially claimed that they carried out the attack. It says:

"The heroic mujahideen have carried out a blessed raid in London. Britain is now burning with fear, terror and panic in its northern, southern, eastern, and western quarters."

You have to actively assume that this group are writing in the third person about themselves in order to come to the conclusion that they are claiming responsibility. The same goes for Bin Laden's video in which he "claimed responsibility" for 9/11.



The fact that anyone could have posted this statement and it came from "Arab Sources" is secondary to the fact that it claims nothing. This will not matter though as over time it will be repeated again and again in the media. The government don't even have to officially announce "Al Qaeda" is responsible.

Furthermore MSNBC TV translator Jacob Keryakes, has pointed out that the claim of responsibility contained an error in one of the Quranic verses it cited. That suggests that the claim may be phony..

"This is not something al-Qaida would do," he said.

THERE IS NOTHING FOR "AL QAEDA" TO GAIN FROM THIS

The Financial Times of London reported on the 6th of July that we were pulling a significant number of troops out of Iraq, then 'Al-Qaeda' bomb us, so the troops stay, how does that benefit 'Al-Qaeda'?

We are supposed to believe that Al Qaeda is made up of intelligent well educated, well off individuals who meticulously plan their operations. Are we to believe that they do not comprehend the fact that if they bomb major Western cities they will feel the wrath of both angry Westerners and well meaning peaceful Muslims.

We need to focus on the question of who will gain from these latest attacks and who has gained from the past attacks? Most importantly we must not just accept what we are told because clearly what we are being told does not add up.

JUST THE BEGINNING

One day after the attacks the inconsistencies and contradictions are mounting. In the weeks and months to come more and more will come out as the official story is demanded by the press and the public. Just as now, we will be here reporting them.

*************************************************************
BryanD
 http://www.ecoquestintl.com/bryand
 http://www.GPSProductsSite.com
*************************************************************

Fred

Comments

Hide the following 21 comments

dummer and dummer

10.07.2005 18:40

Both you and your brother are living in a dream world, wake up and smell the roses

red


One Tracked

10.07.2005 19:04

"All London Buses have CCTV cameras on them, why don't they just watch the one video from the one bus that was attacked and find out if there was a suicide bomber? "

I know I've been on a few London busses where the camera has been smashed, chewing gum smeared over the lens, etc.

Ever thought that the camera was previously damaged in the bus due to vandalism?

Or is that too straight forward for your "clockwork conspiracy" mind to take in?

Londoner


Wow Red

10.07.2005 19:43

Dear Red

Well done on not being able to be fooled by this quite obvious anti-government propoganda.
The way you took apart all of the arguments laid out before you, one by one and in great detail, with masses of background information and prior knowlege has left me convinced. What a fool I was, as I read the article you so articulately dismembered. You know I had almost succumbed to a suspension of disbelief in the face of the articles quite obvious mistruths. I'm glad that your insightful critique has brought me back into the real world and I can now leave my house and smell any flowers I find nearby. Everything is peaceful now, all the questions have left my mind, the sun has come out and the blue sky fills me with a sense of hope and freedom.

Thank you, Thank you, the doubts are gone, Thankyou

A Lexicon


Bush Did It

10.07.2005 20:04

This attack is the work of the New World Order Terrorists (NWOT) attached to the Bush Regime in the UK and America. The attacks are designed to directly intimidate the G8 leaders and the establishments below them who are not with the Bush regime. That is the only logical conclusion one can come to when analyzing all the facts surrounding the attacks.

With the live aid concerts and global public preasure that has been building for decades to end not only poor nations debt but to democratize the world bank out of the hands of its defacto American dictatorship along with the collapse of the global ecology, the Downing Street Memos, Going to the aid of Africa etc. etc. the NWOT are sending a message that no one should fuck with them. That they bring chaos to every nation that does.

If you study history you will discover that the US ran terrorist attacks against Vietnamese public blaiming it on the north and the Vietcong while the French were still occupiers. Offical and unofficial use of terror has always been a tool of the Yankees to maintain the yankee advantage.

Lloyd Hart
mail e-mail: dadapop@dadapop.com
- Homepage: http://dadapop.com


Your right

10.07.2005 20:30

Your right of course

And I suppose that the moon landings were Faked. JFK and Di were killed by (insert which ever clandestine organisation you like), Lucan and Elvis are living in Barbados. Every Bush has a special branch officer hiding it in, In fact Im Probably Special branch myself down loading the contents of you C drive right now.

But don’t give up, it might make a good book

Red


as far as i can tell

10.07.2005 21:01

the article by steve watson is just a series of questions

is it not ok to question anymore?

it seems ok to question G8 and the Geldof Bono charade
as they support puppet-like, the Bush - Blair neocon-neoliberal
agenda for Africa

The privatisation of Water, Power, resources
[globalisation]

is the creation of a malleable
consumer based security state


why then is this agenda not applicable to Britain?
or the EU

it seems to me that certain opportunities are arising
that make it easier for these political controllers
to play on fear, and make a hefty profit in the securi-tech market


The New World is coming faster than you think

This Attack was a meticulously planned operation. Possibly taking months to solve logistically.

Here's a scenario: What if the London Bid had failed? London would lose out on all that cash generated.

There would have been no way to increase those little golden geese...which lay for the wheels of industry.

By 2012 London is expected to have in place a state of the art city, complete with Techno-security measures, such as cashless society, Biometric ID cards, as well as GPS satellite Tagging & fuel taxing.

Now it will get even MORE thanks to Al Queda!

QinetiQ are an ex-Defence company privatised from DERA (Defence Evaluation and Research Agency) which is a Porton Down based entity, and is now controlled by the Carlyle Group

QinetiQ is far reaching in technologies such as : Satellite, GPS, Electronic Surveillance and Countermeasures, Radar Sensors and Consultancy, Electronic Surveillance and Countermeasures, RF Sensor Technologies, Millimetre Wave Radar, Electromagnetics, Electromagnetic Assessment and Research

 http://www.qinetiq.com/home/case_studies/information_communication_and_electronics/security_scanners.html



We know that the Carlyle Group also have matrics RFID in their pocket too.

similarly 'Global risk management' company, Visor, are a risk management company staffing ex-intelligence, see:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Power has a senior Scotland Yard background which includes setting up the multi agency operational management structure at the Kings Cross fire, secondment to the Anti Terrorist Branch, deputy forward control coordinator at the Libyan People Bureau siege and leading the team behind the existing police street philosophy for dealing with terrorist bombs. He is also the primary author / promulgator of the present UK Police command methodology Gold, Silver & Bronze. In addition he frequently speaks on TV & radio (most recently BBC TV Panorama current affairs programme) and is specifically quoted on the BBC web site in relation to his previous role at the scene of major incidents in London. Peter is also a founder member of the UK judging panel for BC Awards.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PETER POWER: "At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise over a company of a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the Railway station where it happened this morning...so i still have the hairs on my neck standing upright..."

PETER ALLEN: "let me get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this, and it happened while you were running the exercise?"

PETER POWER: "Precisely... and er it was about half past nine this morning we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons i don't want to reveal their name, but if their listening they'll know it and we had a room full of crisis managers, for the first time [we'd met] OR [in the Met.]....and so within five minutes we'd made a pretty rapid decision, this is the real one. er and so we went through the correct drill of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking...

PETER ALLEN: [interrupting in his own inimitable style!] "but thats all very good slowtime to quicktime thinking, crisis management procedures but if you've just been blown up by a bomb on a train none of that helps very much, Does It?

 http://www.declarepeace.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/terrorelite.mp3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


add to the scenario, that Rudi Gulianis Risk
management co' is involved somewher in this scenario
[him being in London is just too fishy]
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4661409.stm

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

He also has gathered some of his closest advisers from city hall and founded, in association with the accounting and consultancy firm Ernst and Young, a consulting firm called Giuliani Partners. Among its vice presidents are former police chief Bernard Kerik, former fire chief Thomas Von Essen and the head of the city's emergency services, Richard Scheirer, who coordinated rescue efforts at the World Trade Center. From its posh Times Square offices, the firm offers blue-chip clients such as investment bank Merrill Lynch and telecom giant Nextel access and costly advice on issues from security and finance to crisis management
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



now add to this Corporatist fascist party mix, the strange way the Nasdaq Composite Index; an index which relies on quick boost shortfalls at a maximum punch for TECH stock ideal for investors to make quick gains was played to the tune of 20 BILLION on July 5th
 http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/bbs?post_id=6658705&usernm=dcb


Question: is the Futures Markets Applied to Prediction (FutureMAP)
still in operation, just underanother guise???
this report says they killed it
 http://edition.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/29/terror.market/


remember Darpa [who are behind it, are the US version of DERA [UK]

The kind of technology that is being invested in can be seen at Neotek, who were one of the innovators of FutureMap Technologies. They deal with: optics, Information Technology (IT), Decision Aids (DA), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Man/Machine Interfaces (MMI).

this is a Carlyle Group subsidiary that makes silicon based artificial skin
 http://www.psivida.com/news/download/AnalystReviews/ITSharesIssue7.pdf


all these tech companies are creaming it for the future 'smart cities'...and the smart tech that will run them


and us


it's called behavioral economics: & it's working






pc


Red is such a convincing colour

10.07.2005 22:04

Actually red the Moon landings were faked, In TV studios, on the moon. In one of the most expensive hoaxes ever. Hollywood built studios on the moon, it was the only way to get the low gravity effects and the necessary vacum for the footage. JFK and Diana were both killed by the same magic bullet, something to do with quantum physics and time travel I believe. Lucan and Elvis only work in Barbados. They are ordinary branch operatives, the special ones have been trained to hide in cacti. I hope you enjoy working in special branch. I similarly hope you enjoy the contents of my C drive.

It's already made several good books, I recommend several of them for different reasons.

Have a lovely evening.

Be seeing you.

Ex Lex


ask the Iraqies

10.07.2005 22:05

Funny to see how people strongly object to the possibility of an inside job.
Are they so sure the government wouldn´t sacrifice a few lives for it´s own cause?
What about the soldiers who went to Iraq to find made-up weapons of mass-destruction and died? How about the 100.000 Iraqies who died for the same non-existing threat? Or the 30.000 Afganies that died in the search of a never found Bin Laden? Not even mentioning the Falklands and over a million other cinical acts that can only be explained from the viewpoint of power and greed.

I´m not saying that MI5 is behind the whole thing, or the Mossad or who ever. Even it it were "real" religious extremists" You can assume that they (the service) just decided to stand back and let it happen.
We will probably never know what exactly happened in London that day, but assuming it`s bussines as usual, somebody has been doing the government a real favour.

No, your live doesn´t count for those in power, learn to live with that or fight back!

The Dutch connection.

Feral


bigger picture

10.07.2005 22:54

an ideology built from the British Empire
and the USA's foreign interests


Jack Philby [father of double agent Kim Phlilby]
was charged with helping create a new way of
maximizing control over Saudikingdom assets

this Empire control mechanism is nothing new

one of these ways was the forming of a new
version of Islamic religion
using what is known as 'the process'
involving cultic steering
and identity control
Wahhabi'ism

Al Bana
adored Hitler

The Grand mufti
met with Hitler
created a crack troops in Egypt
to fight the Allies

The Muslim brotherhood
were co-opted after WWII
by the British to contain the Israelis

One of these
Egyptians was Yasser Arafat

---------------------------------
Arab discontent again exploded into widespread civil disobedience during a general strike in 1936. By this time, the militant Zionist group Irgun Zvai Leumi was orchestrating attacks on Palestinian and British targets with the aim of "liberating" Palestine and Transjordan (modern-day Jordan) by force.
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/middle_east/03/v3_ip_timeline/html/default.stm
----------------------------------

this was a similar operation to
the recruiting
of the nazi remnants which happened as
the Soviet BlocK became the new threat
[The Gehlen Organisation]

Thsi operation led to the NATO secret stay behind units
[known as Gladio in Italy] to fund and fight Marxist / communist
threats from dissidents via a secret mullti government
US 'Marshall plan' agreemnent

The Saudi Philby steered] Wahhabi religion
and Sufi-Neobandi [taliban]
was the basis for

the Mujahadeen
which was trained and facilitated further by the
CIA-Bush nexus and the Saudi-Royalty with the formation of
Madrasses in Afghanistan...Pakistan, Uzbekistan

MAK - precursor to

Al Queda
we know it now as Islamo-fascism

see the 'old man of the mountain' Hassan i sabbah
and the Hashish assassins legend for the Nazis Sufi influence
from Tibet - Far east

The Nazi Scientists obtained via Operation Paperclip
were experimenting with creating the perfect agent,
killer, soldier...perfectly obedient

The CIA pushed the envelope further


many US Government agencies have been
investing time and money over many years
to perfect the 'assassination' technique

They are what you see now
They are the children who have
been abused and indoctrinated

These groups are an Ideology which sees it's roots and its
realisation in a similar manner to such cults as
Charles Manson, The Process
Church, Heavens gate
see also the Jonestown Massacre
see the moonies techniques, and Falon gong in China

and see lighter versions of cultic steering in
science fiction
Acid culture
New age
Maitreya [bastardised from Baha'i]
'UFO'
'conspiracy'
'anti capitalism'

name an ideology

neuro-linguistically programme the language
set the tone with an identity/image association

and you're nearly on your way to creating your own cult

in fact its not hard to see that this world
its inhabitants are being bombarded with
programming constantly

our perception being managed

and so are the 'terrorists'


















paul c


sound familiar?

10.07.2005 23:38

Project ARTICHOKE



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.



Project ARTICHOKE was a CIA project that researched interrogation methods and arose from project BLUEBIRD in 1951 August 20.

The project studied hypnosis, among other methods, to produce amnesia in subjects. Magician John Mullholland consulted for the project.

A memorandum by Richard Helms to director Allen Welsh Dulles indicated it became project MKULTRA in 1953 April 20. It was an offensive programme of mind control that gathered together the intelligence divisions of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and FBI.

The scope of the project was outlined in a memo dated January 1952 that stated, "Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self preservation?"

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_ARTICHOKE


------------------------------------------------------------------------
what technologies are at use now?
& what are they doing in Guantanamo Bay and Diego Garcia?

paul c


I hope PC and Paul C are the same person.

11.07.2005 00:09

Good work there. Lots of detail to chew on. I like it. Saw the Guliani bit and the QuinetiQ bit and the Olympics bit, but not in as much detail. Can you direct us all to first hand sources of this information? I always feel the internet is a little too third hand and fluid. Also I believe that even if this all was meticulously planned for the stated outcome you have suggested in your explaination, there is still a fairly massive margin for error and chaos to cause mutations in the plan, and a probable abortion soon enough, reverting back to a longer term consideration, outwith anyones direct control.

Buy My Videos!

Ex Lex


here

11.07.2005 00:19




i agree that there is much choas

but with an ideology
which is pure
dogma

such as the twisted version
of islam these mind controlled zombies are
under the influence of


there are other dogmatic sterring devices apparent

enforced choice

and continous upgrade culture

in this consumer society by
the cartel is another

if we become aware of these
behavior control devices

we can reverse engineer them and their source

 http://www.declarepeace.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/london.html

i honestly dont know THE truth
its a journey of co-incidences that i observed
that is all




paul c


of course

11.07.2005 00:55

another great example of cult control

is army training

which has become the basis for boot camps
for teenagers
[run by Christian zealots: see mind control]

these poor kids are
labelled as having oppositional defiance disorder
or attention deficit disorder
[no accident that the same cartel who prescribe this shit
are putting uppers in junk food & drink: aspartame...splenda]
and then the same cartel bung 'em all on Ritalin or Prozac or Luvox
[made by the same cartel]

and then the odd kid goes on a shooting spree
[see columbine...see Jeff Weise]
because the suicide/paranioa inducing SSRI they was on was
covered up by the medical association or FDA
[same cartel]

this type of pain trauma - behaviour modification technique
is now filtering through to
abuse based TV programming
[same cartel]

isn't corporatism wonderful



paul c


Paul C

11.07.2005 08:31

Yes Paul

I can see why you cross reference those details in that order. I am not cirticising your overview. I am simply looking for the impetus. You see a system of control, and you see a great many people acting on impulses from that control, psychological or otherwise. Where does the initial push come from? Why?, when we can barely get important, powerful, influential people to agree on the simplest most positive of matters, would they all coalesce with many, many henchmen who must be partially aware of the 'plan' into a pattern of deceit and manipulation.

I can see that the pattern is there. Now where does it originate from? This we will have to understand if we are ever going to reverse engineer it. In 7000 years I have not seen any progress in this regard.

Any ideas?

Ex Lex


i forgot Glastonbury

11.07.2005 10:58

will be adding Glastonbury to that page because

it was basically an experiment

ID cards for everyone

and a great big fence around it

geo-behavioural consumer
entertainment zone, wouldn't you say?

as for the way this is done

I would speculate that
the ancient knowledge
is Masonic - bloodline
related

and gatekeepers manage it

the Rossetta stone is a good example
3 sets of symbols [hieroglyphics]
on one stone
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosetta_Stone

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some scientists [1] accompanied Napoleon's French campaign in Egypt (1798-1801). After Napoleon Bonaparte founded the Institut de l'Egypte in Cairo in 1798 some 50 became members of it. Bouchard found a black stone when guiding construction works in the Fort Julien near the city of Rosetta.

He immediately understood the importance of the stone

and showed it to general Abdallah Jacques de Menou who decided that it should be brought to the institute, where it arrived in August, 1799.

In 1801 the French had to surrender. A dispute arose about the results of the scientists - the French wishing to keep them, while the British considered them forfeit, in the name of King George III.

The French scientist Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, writing to the English diplomat William Richard Hamilton threatened to burn all their discoveries, ominously referring to the burned Library of Alexandria. The British capitulated, and they insisted only on the delivery of the monuments. The French tried to hide the Stone in a boat despite the clauses of the capitulation, but failed. The French were allowed to take the imprints they had made previously, when embarking in Alexandria.

When it was brought back to Britain, it was presented to the British Museum, where it has been kept since 1802.

White painted inscriptions, contemporary with its acquisition, record on the left side 'Captured in Egypt by the British Army in 1801' and on the right 'Presented by King George III'. The Stone was cleaned by the British Museum in 1998, and this evidence of its history was not removed. A small area of the surface at the bottom left hand corner was also left uncleaned for comparative purposes.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



the guy who is said to have finally cracked it
was working on it for years

and came up with the astounding theory
that the symbols on the stone

represented 'some form of language'

and these 3 sets of symbols
were different versions of the same language


how perceptive
took decades

thats smells of the Gatekeeping of Knowledge...
as does the rape of Alexandria

Also there is the correlation between Napoleons campaign in the Middle east
And Hitlers

And now Bushes

three reichs
searching for knowledge?


wonder what other stuff these Elites are sitting on

Rosetta Stone is also used as a metaphor to refer to anything that is a critical
key to a process of decryption, translation,

[reverse engineering]

It is my opinion

that Neuro linguistic programming
is one of these 'ancient knowledge bases'

a 'script' template which enables the formation
and control...'managements of Religions'

a belief 'engine'


















paul c


Some New Developments

12.07.2005 02:27

 http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=15717499%26method=full%26siteid=94762%26headline=exclusive%2d%2d58%2d%2dthe%2dhunt-name_page.html

EXCLUSIVE: THE HUNT
Exclusive By Jeff Edwards And Chris Hughes

SCOTLAND Yard launched Britain's biggest ever manhunt yesterday to catch the London bombers - vowing: "We will go to the ends of the earth to nail these coldblooded killers."

...

But the investigation received a serious setback when it was discovered the CCTV cameras on the bus that blew up were not working so detectives will not get vital images of the bomber. One senior Yard source said: "It's a big blow and a disappointment. If the cameras had been running we would have had pin-sharp close-up pictures of the person who carried out this atrocity.

"We don't know if the driver forgot to switch them on or if there was a technical problem but there are no images."

The bus had four cameras - one covering people getting on, the second at the exit doors and one on each deck scanning the length of the vehicle.


 http://wireservice.wired.com/wired/story.asp?section=Breaking&storyId=1061793&tw=wn_wire_story

London bombs suggest local but well-equipped cell

Monday, July 11, 2005 8:27 a.m. ET

By Mark Trevelyan and Mike Holden

LONDON (Reuters) - Suspected al Qaeda militants behind the London bombings may well have come from a previously unknown local cell and yet had access to military explosives, European security officials familiar with the probe said.

"The explosives appear to be of military origin, which is very worrying," said Christophe Chaboud, head of the French Anti-Terrorism Coordination Unit and one of five top officials sent by Paris to London immediately after Thursday's attacks.

"We're more used to cells making home-made explosives with chemicals. How did they get them?" he said in an interview with Le Monde newspaper.


 http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article298105.ece

Police hunt 'mercenary' terror gang recruited by al-Qa'ida

By Sophie Goodchild, Severin Carrell and Raymond Whitaker


Police and intelligence agents areinvestigating the theory that a gang of white "mercenary terrorists" was hired by al-Qa'ida to carry out last week's devastating attacks on London. The Independent on Sunday can reveal today that investigations into the bombings of three Tube trains and a bus, which left at least 49 people dead, are focusing on the possibility that criminal gangs were paid to mount the worst atrocities in British history.

...

The theory was given credence by the fact that the security services had no advance warnings, suggesting that the bombers were not known extremists. Police and intelligence agencies admitted yesterday they were caught off guard.

The Metropolitan Police's investigation team is analysing hours of CCTV footage from around the targeted train stations and from the bus wreck, as well as checking lock-ups and garages for any clues that may lead them to the bombers. There is growing fear that the cells involved could be about to carry out further attacks. There was also alarm at the sophisticated nature of the explosives.

Alarm about the terrorists' expertise sharply increased after it emerged yesterday that all three of the Underground bombings took place within seconds of each other. The Met said they now had new evidence which clearly indicated that the blasts on the Tube trains had happened "almost simultaneously".

Kelly Duke


Just because it sounds like state sponsored mil/intel

12.07.2005 02:30

and just because a state sponsored mil/intel group would have far better means and far greater opportunity and just because not one of last 350 terrorist attacks against Israel (since 9/2000) has been so tightly coordinated OR so horrendously fatal doesn't mean that state sponsored mil/intel had anything to do with this. Because we all know that's just crazy talk. It doesn't matter whom the evidence points to because anybody who isn't a nutjob conspiracy kook already knows who the real culprits here are: guys in caves on dialysis machines who hate us for our freedoms, of course.

 http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Terrorism/victims.html

The webpage linked above lists over 350 separate fatal incidents resulting in well over 1000 Israeli fatalities since September, 2000. I haven't yet located a single incident out of these 350+ in which more than 30 Israelis died. Nor have I found a single example of a well-coordinated, multiple-attack terrorist strike (defined as three or more separate fatal acts of terrorism executed within a span of three hours). Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I could direct me to these entries?

Now, it seems to me that the more sophisticated and spectacular an act of terrorism is -- the more, shall we say, made-for-TV -- the greater chance that this dramatically successful act of terrorism was state sponsored to achieve some political end. This is purely a function of the far greater MEANS and OPPORTUNITY of state sponsored mil/intel organizations when compared with those of the typical Jihadist terrorists they are tasked with foiling. Surely, we would all agree that this exact pattern (of highly dramatic and potent terrorist acts correlating with covert state sponsored activities) is quite typical in the historical records of many perhaps less "politically enlightened" regions -- such as Indonesia, South Africa and Latin America, for example.

Unlike Israel (which deals with far more numerous but typically far less potent Jihadist attacks), the USA & Great Britain appear to deal almost exclusively with spectacularly successful, well-coordinated, highly sophisticated MADE-FOR-TV Goldfinger/Dr. No-type terrorists.

The Jihadist terrorists attacking Israel don't typically choose highly symbolic strike dates (like 9/11 or 7.7 -- with years of inactivity between) to launch singular and discrete but highly memorable, extremely fatal and very well-coordinated multi-strikes. In contrast, real terrorist organizations almost invariably attempt to highlight the desperate straits of their causes by aggressively claiming full responsibility for their violent acts using previously known and recognized channels and spokesmen. Furthermore, these real Jihadist terrorist organizations do not put a premium on huge and horrifically fatal MADE-FOR-TV terror muscle-flexing but instead foster a continual atmosphere of perilousness by striking whenever, wherever and however they can.

Maybe I'm far too cynical, but I've started to suspect that the term "al Qaeda" has now come to simply signify any anonymous act of terror that might otherwise appear sophisticated enough to implicate state-sponsored mil/intel. I realize that this is a generalization at best, but please understand the context in which I'm daring to utter such blasphemous thoughtcrime. Our entire corporate media apparatus and political hierarchy have already convicted Islamic fundamentalists of today's crimes with nary a shred of backing evidence. In contrast, I'm not trying to convince anyone to jump to any hasty conclusions -- just to duly consider all logically probable alternatives.

John Abrams


thanks

15.07.2005 14:27

ta for the above links and comments

paul c


Stunned

17.07.2005 03:35

It's been a while since I've read such a load of bollox as this 'inside job' pile of shite, supposedly written by a journalist.

You talk about contradictions, try reading your own piece mate.

You talk about 'scaremongering', and yet accept the inevitability of an attack happening here in the same article. I thought the Government's statements on an attack happening here were massively overplayed, until last week. Now, tragically, we can no longer hold that view. It has happened, and you can say what you like about the whys and wherefores. But they were right all along, and we were wrong for doubting it.

You also fail to accept that information changes rapidly on a story like this, as you would know if you tried to get information about the numbers of people killed when a major incident happens.

If you work on a story like this, you can only go with the most up to date information at hand. When you are told that bodies are not being removed because of forensic requirements and damage to the tunnel, I would say it is fair to assume that both are correct at some point in the equation, not either or. It is never that black or white.

That there are people still registered as missing underlines this point, and proves how hard it can sometimes be to get a graps on the number of fatalities.

As for the 'fake' drills, the preparation the emergency services have put into dealing with a disaster such as this, has ultimately been to the benefit of many thousands of people on July 8.

Having also spoken to many Londoners about this tragedy, one thing they are all agreed on -despite many divisions - is how well prepared the emergency services were to deal with the fallout.

There are many things with which I share the writer's conerns on this issue: dodgy house arrests, questions over security, how much was known in advance of the attacks, our role in Iraq.

But to suggest that it's an inside job? Utter crap. You should get out more.

A reporter


it was never a terrorist threat when it was the ira..it was bomb scare

25.07.2005 14:10

why when the ira were bombing did we get bomb scares....we didnt have tony bliar on the telly telling us that not all irish were linked to the ira.now its terrorist threats...and why 20 yrs ago didnt we have the g8..it was just live aid

yvette
mail e-mail: yve77e@hotmail.co.uk


Giuliani and Netanhayu; Al Qaeda General's

30.07.2005 11:24

The fact that Giuliani was "only yards away" from one of the bombings is strange enough for sure. Then there was Giuliani and Netanhayu and their simultaneous BS marathon media appearances for MANY different media outlets from London on the morning of 7-7 was also very suspect.

Then I find out that Netanhayu and Giuliani were staying in the same hotel!

"...Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had been on his way to a London hotel near the scene of one of the four blasts that ripped through the city today, said Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom. Netanyahu was the scheduled keynote speaker at an Israeli corporate investment conference at the Great Eastern hotel near the Liverpool Street subway station..." [Source]

And Rudi:

July 8, 2005 - "...Giuliani was having breakfast at the Great Eastern Hotel a half block from the Liverpool Street Station in Central London, when he heard an explosion, according to his spokeswoman Sunny Mindel..."
Source
 http://www.parapolitics.info/phorum/read.php?f=44&i=13&t=13


Both Rudi and Bin were also together "only blocks away" from the NYC 9-11 attacks. Now what are the odds of one man being a block away from both 7-7 AND 9-11?? Now double those odds and add the same TWO men only blocks away.
Hmmm

mondo
- Homepage: http://nascarblue.blogspot.com


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech