Means, Motive and Opportunity
Concerned | 31.07.2005 06:13 | Analysis
I don't care what your emotional response to these suggestions is. To leave these questions unanswered would be simply irresponsible.
Could you perhaps attempt to ascertain whether any of the 'plain-clothed', armed men who shot an innocent man seven times in the head worked for these companies?
Could you perhaps attempt to ascertain whether any of the 'plain-clothed', armed men who shot an innocent man seven times in the head worked for these companies?
Prime Terror Suspects: Israeli Security Companies Have the Means, Motive and Opportunity
Would the inspectors of Scotland Yard please examine the alibis of the private safety personnel who regularly roam the London Underground?
They have the opportunity. They have unsupervised access to trains and tracks at all times. They also control the CCTV.
They have the means. As experts on security, they have had explosives training. Especially true if they are intelligence operatives.
And they have the motive. As Jewish musician Gilad Atzmon has pointed out, Israel would benefit from a clash between the West and Islam. This is especially true since Muslims are the ones who are being accused of (or framed for) the bombings.
Also, access to military explosives is no problem for them. Israeli security companies are usually manned by Shinbet or Mossad ex-agents. And why not? These are the people who have had more experience with 'terrorism' than anybody else on earth.
Israelis are the most qualified people on earth to create, man, and manage private security services to "guard" against terror. Israel is the most "terror-afflicted" country in the world. On the other hand, this also makes Israel the most likely breeding ground of terrorism.
A good crime investigator would always question the private guards. They have unlimited access to the crime scene, they know how to handle explosives, and in the case of people who call Israel mother, they have the strongest motive.
Nobody other than the security company needs to be in on it. Others may be honestly looking for answers and following false leads and planted evidence. The security company can easily send governments and investigators on wild goose chases.
If they were, say, to leave four unexploded devices for investigators to find, in order to point them in a certain direction.
Conspiracy theories are weak if they involve too many people.
I don't trust theories that would involve MI5, CIA, FBI etc. These are big organizations. The Mossad is a small organization, and it is tribal and located in a small isolated country. They can keep things among themselves.
But we have had many whistleblowers from the CIA, MI5, FBI and other government organizations.
The most successful conspiracies are those that are executed by a small closed group that would keep government investigators uninformed and confused.
This would also explain why 9/11, Madrid and other "terror" attacks are so difficult to investigate.
The Israeli security company ICTS was in charge of 9/11 airports and the Madrid train station.
Who was in charge of security or maintenance at the World Trade Center?
Crimes are difficult to solve when trusted people commit them. Inside jobs are the easiest crimes to commit.
Israeli Security to Protect London's Underground
18:32 Sep 21, '04
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=69208
Would the inspectors of Scotland Yard please examine the alibis of the private safety personnel who regularly roam the London Underground?
They have the opportunity. They have unsupervised access to trains and tracks at all times. They also control the CCTV.
They have the means. As experts on security, they have had explosives training. Especially true if they are intelligence operatives.
And they have the motive. As Jewish musician Gilad Atzmon has pointed out, Israel would benefit from a clash between the West and Islam. This is especially true since Muslims are the ones who are being accused of (or framed for) the bombings.
Also, access to military explosives is no problem for them. Israeli security companies are usually manned by Shinbet or Mossad ex-agents. And why not? These are the people who have had more experience with 'terrorism' than anybody else on earth.
Israelis are the most qualified people on earth to create, man, and manage private security services to "guard" against terror. Israel is the most "terror-afflicted" country in the world. On the other hand, this also makes Israel the most likely breeding ground of terrorism.
A good crime investigator would always question the private guards. They have unlimited access to the crime scene, they know how to handle explosives, and in the case of people who call Israel mother, they have the strongest motive.
Nobody other than the security company needs to be in on it. Others may be honestly looking for answers and following false leads and planted evidence. The security company can easily send governments and investigators on wild goose chases.
If they were, say, to leave four unexploded devices for investigators to find, in order to point them in a certain direction.
Conspiracy theories are weak if they involve too many people.
I don't trust theories that would involve MI5, CIA, FBI etc. These are big organizations. The Mossad is a small organization, and it is tribal and located in a small isolated country. They can keep things among themselves.
But we have had many whistleblowers from the CIA, MI5, FBI and other government organizations.
The most successful conspiracies are those that are executed by a small closed group that would keep government investigators uninformed and confused.
This would also explain why 9/11, Madrid and other "terror" attacks are so difficult to investigate.
The Israeli security company ICTS was in charge of 9/11 airports and the Madrid train station.
Who was in charge of security or maintenance at the World Trade Center?
Crimes are difficult to solve when trusted people commit them. Inside jobs are the easiest crimes to commit.
Israeli Security to Protect London's Underground
18:32 Sep 21, '04
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=69208
Concerned
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
Stick to debunking the claims
31.07.2005 09:37
The worst of the July 7th bombs was on the Piccadilly line. The Piccadilly line is operated by Tube Lines, not by Metronet Rail. Therefore this already tenuous theory doesn't add up. If Verint systems were really involved then they'd at least stick to the lines they actually operate on!
Paul
Terror or ist?
31.07.2005 09:39
Ivor bigun
rlevant information? ireelevant accusation of antisemitism
31.07.2005 09:41
For those that look so deep inside this matter that they also read the hidden ones..
(wich i do becus on several occasions i actually found usefull links in hidden articles..)
I think the bombing with antisemitism accusations should be over..
every article that anyhow links israel to anything, is considered antisemite by a bunch of (what i suspect are) zionist anti informational morons.
If the mossad is more then any other secret service in a position to organise, or involve in, attacks like the london and madrid one.
Then information that all these objects has a strict relation with a same israelian security organisation is relevant.
Even if not the official fbi etc., sources stated that the mossad is the one organisation to pick for such operations..:
The information about security organisation is utterly relevant.
A next point is if its true.. it seems so..
so i wonder why this article has been hidden..
Ofcourse its a 'jews did it' statement for the ones that want to regard it that way..
But if that means we can never uncover what happened because the holy state of judaism is aforehand excused and invulnerable and infallible..
.
then for me every of this contentless this anti-antisemite statements only raises my suspicion.
I swear i never harboured antisemite feelings...
but seeing the mediamanipulation done in the name of anti antisemitism each and every day doesnt lift my rising suspicions at all..
I dont clearly see what is the means of this policy if not the gamble that by obstructing free informations, the general desinformational level of the public will remain enough ground to
forbid finding out what is really going on around us.
So what i plead is that indymedia finds ways for acceptance of critics on the state of israel,
and her institutions
, the mere fact that posts referring to israel are rather structurally hidden as a result of the
'all bow for the suffering of the jews syndrome'
fascilitates the actual impact of an organisation like the mossad to a level they themselves do dream of.
that said, i realise indymedia fears the antisemite argument a lot..
We at indymedia see a lot of extreme rightwing trolling, besides to it being unpleasant to find when ur just looking for information, it could give the indymedia collectives a very unfitting aura of conservatism, or discrimination,
I think however that normal editorial measures should suffice..
these are: bad language is not acceptable,
direct dicrimination is not acceptable,
information indicating the nation of israel is not bad language or direct discrimination.
Its a result of worrying of the public and private investigations and an attempt to uncover a timeline of events, that is not associated in an anti semite context,
the mossad isnt a semite organisation, its an organisation just like cia, m15 , m16, fbi etc,
and since its both operationally trained, and in the alliance of ruling powers (the european economism and usian consumism), is a very natural player of a role in these parts.
what role is yet to be discovered, or at least unveiled.. hiding articles that post significant information about the accurate involvment of certain secret services and security organisations directly and superfluously linked by a whole set of terrorist"" attacks,
doesnt help us.
Cant we make the point that the whole antisemitism compassion is actrually turning us into anti judaists??
i think indymedia should have the right to be suspicious about every secret organisation with obvious interests in the war on islam.
onix