Police Story Falling Apart: No Evidence
Financial Outrage | 16.08.2005 19:28
Keep in mind that we still do not know who actually killed this man, or who they worked for. Since the day's "unsuccessful attack" left behind "evidence" supposedly intended to direct investigators in a specific direction, this electrician may have inadvertently witnessed intelligence agents planting them. Where was he working that morning? In the tube?
Two Half Page UK Mainstream Media Articles - Police Story Falling Apart
No CCTV To Reveal Why Police Shot Brazilian - Say Police
Innocent Brazilian was shot by TWO Officers
Tube Lines says its cameras at Stockwell WERE WORKING on July 22
NO CCTV TO REVEAL WHY POLICE SHOT BRAZILIAN
by Stephen Wright - Chief Crime Correspondent
UK - Daily Mail Saturday 13th August, 2005
50% of Page 11 - again NOT included on the Daily Mail web site.
Scotland yard came under renewed pressure last night as doubts grew over its account of the killing of an innocent man mistaken for a suicide bomber.
Details have emerged which undermine the force’s claims that officers had no alternative but to shoot Jean Charles de Menezes.
The revelations are a blow to the Metropolitan Police, which is expected to pay more than 500,000 compensation to his family.
In the aftermath of the shooting, it was claimed that Mr de Menezes, a Brazilian, vaulted over a ticket barrier and sprinted down the escalators to escape police. The 27-tear-old electrician was also said to have refused to surrender and to have been wearing a bulky winter coat.
But it has now emerged that:
Mr de Menezes used an Oyster travel card to go through the ticket barriers.
Initially, at least, he walked to the platform.
It is believed the officers did not properly identify themselves before opening fire.
he was not wearing a heavy jacket.
It has also emerged that CCTV footage of the shooting, which could have been vital to an inquiry, will not be available because most of the security cameras at Stockwell Tube station, South London, were not working.
This will come as a severe disappointment to Mr Menezes’s family, who had hoped that security footage would prove officers had no reason to open fire. It is also likely to fuel claims that the public were misled over the events leading up to Mr Menezes’s death.
In the aftermath of the July 7 and 21 attacks in London, Police seized thousands of CCTV tapes from the capital’s Underground and rail system. The CCTV blunder at Stockwell means investigators will now have to rely on witness testimonies and the accounts of police officers.
Mr de Menezes was shot eight times - seven times in the head - on July 22.
Three plain clothes officers followed Mr de Menezes after he came out of a block of flats in Tulse Hill, South London, where police believed one of the failed July 21 bombers Lived. They tailed him for several miles before he arrived at Stockwell Tube station.
It is understood that the officers were given strict instructions that the suspect should not be allowed to get on the Underground.
When he got on a train, Mr de Menezes, who had no connection to terrorism but may well have been afraid of having to answer questions about his immigration status, was pinned down and shot. The senior officer in charge on the day of the shooting, Commander Cressida Dick will face questions about the decisions made in the run-up to the incident.
It is understood that once the officers went underground, they lost radio contact with Scotland Yard and the decision to open fire had to be taken by the pursuers. The First Commander Dick knew of the shooting was a terse radio message which said: ‘Man down.’
The Independent Police Complains Commission is investigating Mr de Menezes’s death. Sources close to the case say the operation which led to the shooting was hampered by ‘communication problems and misunderstandings’ between undercover police, marksmen and senior officers.
The commission is assessing whether rules for dealing with suspected suicide bombers were complied with, and whether Mr de Menezes was killed lawfully. An inquest will also be held into the death, which has raised widespread concerns about the police’s ‘shoot to kill policy’. Insiders say the case shows guidelines for tackling suspected suicide bombers, code named Operation Kratos, are unworkable.
Kratos is based on the theory that shooting a bomber in the head is the only way to ensure his device is not detonated.
Senior police officers have described Mr de Menezes death as a ‘tragedy’ but say they have no option but to continue with the policy.
Last night, it emerged that the officer who killed Mr de Menezes is due to return to work in the next week after being sent on a free holiday by his force. The unidentified marksman will not be on frontline duties pending the outcome of the commission’s investigation.
Two weeks ago, a senior Metropolitan Police officer flew to Brazil to offer compensation to Mr de Menezes’s parents.
John Yates, a deputy assistant commissioner at Scotland Yard is thought to have agreed to make an initial payment - running into thousands of pounds. The offer was ex-gratia, meaning it will not affect the final amount paid. Some legal experts believe the force could end up paying up to 570,000 in damages.
a London Underground spokesman last night refused to discuss the CCTV blunders at Stockwell, saying he was unable to comment on individual stations for security reasons.
s.wright@dailymail.co.uk
Innocent
Brazilian
was shot by
TWO officers
By Christopher Leake and Martin Smith
UK - Mail on Sunday 14th August, 2005
50% of Page 10 - again NOT included in their web site.
The innocent Brazilian killed by police after being mistaken for a suicide bomber was shot by two officers, the Mail on Sunday can reveal.
It was originally thought only one marksman was involved in the death of 27-year-old Jean Charles de Menezes.
But it has now emerged that the seven bullets to his head and one in the shoulder were fired by two guns.
last night a source close to the case confirmed: ‘There were, in fact, two policemen who fired the fatal shots.’
The tragedy happened on July 22 after Mr de Menezes, an electrician left a block of flats at Tulse Hill, South London, where police believed one of the failed Tube and bus bombers from the previous day had been living. Three plain clothes officers tailed Mr de Menezes for several miles before he arrived at Stockwell Tube station. As he got to a train Mr de Menezes was pinned down and shot from close range.
‘Why was CCTV at Tube not working properly?’
In a separate development it was claimed yesterday that CCTV footage of the shooting, vital to the enquiry into his death, will not be available because most of the cameras at the station were not working.
Tube Lines, the company responsible for the maintenance of CCTV on the Underground ,denied the allegation, saying its cameras at Stockwell were working on July 22.
The police have already stated that 24 hours before Mr de Menezes was shot, three of the four bombings suspects had assembled at the station at 12.25pm, suggesting they had confirmation of that fact from security cameras.
Last night both Scotland Yard and London Underground refused to comment on whether cameras had been used to identify the suspects. And the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) which is investigating Mr de Menezes’s death, said only: ‘We have all the evidence that is available.’
But Harriet Wistrich, the lawyer representing Mr de Menezes’s family told the Mail on Sunday: ‘It beggars belief that there was no CCTV at Stockwell Tube station at a time when London is on a high security alert. Ever since 7/7 every station should have been fitted with CCTV cameras and they should have been working properly. It begs the question whether we are being given a true and accurate picture of the evidence available.’
The two officers who shot Mr de Menezes - from the Yard’s elite firearms unit, SO19 - face possible prosecution for murder or manslaughter when the investigation is complete. The IPCC’s report, which will take months to compile, will be sent to the Crown prosecution Service. The CPS will decide if the officers should be taken to court. An inquest will also be held.
The day after the shooting it was claimed that Mr de Menezes vaulted over a ticket barrier and sprinted down escalators to escape police. He was also said to have refused to surrender and to have been wearing a bulky winter coat. But it has now been disclosed by witnesses that he used an Oyster travel card to pass through the ticket barrier, and that, at first, he walked to the platform.
It is believed the officers did not properly identify themselves to him. Also, he was not wearing a heavy jacket which might have hidden a potential suicide bomb.
No CCTV To Reveal Why Police Shot Brazilian - Say Police
Innocent Brazilian was shot by TWO Officers
Tube Lines says its cameras at Stockwell WERE WORKING on July 22
NO CCTV TO REVEAL WHY POLICE SHOT BRAZILIAN
by Stephen Wright - Chief Crime Correspondent
UK - Daily Mail Saturday 13th August, 2005
50% of Page 11 - again NOT included on the Daily Mail web site.
Scotland yard came under renewed pressure last night as doubts grew over its account of the killing of an innocent man mistaken for a suicide bomber.
Details have emerged which undermine the force’s claims that officers had no alternative but to shoot Jean Charles de Menezes.
The revelations are a blow to the Metropolitan Police, which is expected to pay more than 500,000 compensation to his family.
In the aftermath of the shooting, it was claimed that Mr de Menezes, a Brazilian, vaulted over a ticket barrier and sprinted down the escalators to escape police. The 27-tear-old electrician was also said to have refused to surrender and to have been wearing a bulky winter coat.
But it has now emerged that:
Mr de Menezes used an Oyster travel card to go through the ticket barriers.
Initially, at least, he walked to the platform.
It is believed the officers did not properly identify themselves before opening fire.
he was not wearing a heavy jacket.
It has also emerged that CCTV footage of the shooting, which could have been vital to an inquiry, will not be available because most of the security cameras at Stockwell Tube station, South London, were not working.
This will come as a severe disappointment to Mr Menezes’s family, who had hoped that security footage would prove officers had no reason to open fire. It is also likely to fuel claims that the public were misled over the events leading up to Mr Menezes’s death.
In the aftermath of the July 7 and 21 attacks in London, Police seized thousands of CCTV tapes from the capital’s Underground and rail system. The CCTV blunder at Stockwell means investigators will now have to rely on witness testimonies and the accounts of police officers.
Mr de Menezes was shot eight times - seven times in the head - on July 22.
Three plain clothes officers followed Mr de Menezes after he came out of a block of flats in Tulse Hill, South London, where police believed one of the failed July 21 bombers Lived. They tailed him for several miles before he arrived at Stockwell Tube station.
It is understood that the officers were given strict instructions that the suspect should not be allowed to get on the Underground.
When he got on a train, Mr de Menezes, who had no connection to terrorism but may well have been afraid of having to answer questions about his immigration status, was pinned down and shot. The senior officer in charge on the day of the shooting, Commander Cressida Dick will face questions about the decisions made in the run-up to the incident.
It is understood that once the officers went underground, they lost radio contact with Scotland Yard and the decision to open fire had to be taken by the pursuers. The First Commander Dick knew of the shooting was a terse radio message which said: ‘Man down.’
The Independent Police Complains Commission is investigating Mr de Menezes’s death. Sources close to the case say the operation which led to the shooting was hampered by ‘communication problems and misunderstandings’ between undercover police, marksmen and senior officers.
The commission is assessing whether rules for dealing with suspected suicide bombers were complied with, and whether Mr de Menezes was killed lawfully. An inquest will also be held into the death, which has raised widespread concerns about the police’s ‘shoot to kill policy’. Insiders say the case shows guidelines for tackling suspected suicide bombers, code named Operation Kratos, are unworkable.
Kratos is based on the theory that shooting a bomber in the head is the only way to ensure his device is not detonated.
Senior police officers have described Mr de Menezes death as a ‘tragedy’ but say they have no option but to continue with the policy.
Last night, it emerged that the officer who killed Mr de Menezes is due to return to work in the next week after being sent on a free holiday by his force. The unidentified marksman will not be on frontline duties pending the outcome of the commission’s investigation.
Two weeks ago, a senior Metropolitan Police officer flew to Brazil to offer compensation to Mr de Menezes’s parents.
John Yates, a deputy assistant commissioner at Scotland Yard is thought to have agreed to make an initial payment - running into thousands of pounds. The offer was ex-gratia, meaning it will not affect the final amount paid. Some legal experts believe the force could end up paying up to 570,000 in damages.
a London Underground spokesman last night refused to discuss the CCTV blunders at Stockwell, saying he was unable to comment on individual stations for security reasons.
s.wright@dailymail.co.uk Innocent
Brazilian
was shot by
TWO officers
By Christopher Leake and Martin Smith
UK - Mail on Sunday 14th August, 2005
50% of Page 10 - again NOT included in their web site.
The innocent Brazilian killed by police after being mistaken for a suicide bomber was shot by two officers, the Mail on Sunday can reveal.
It was originally thought only one marksman was involved in the death of 27-year-old Jean Charles de Menezes.
But it has now emerged that the seven bullets to his head and one in the shoulder were fired by two guns.
last night a source close to the case confirmed: ‘There were, in fact, two policemen who fired the fatal shots.’
The tragedy happened on July 22 after Mr de Menezes, an electrician left a block of flats at Tulse Hill, South London, where police believed one of the failed Tube and bus bombers from the previous day had been living. Three plain clothes officers tailed Mr de Menezes for several miles before he arrived at Stockwell Tube station. As he got to a train Mr de Menezes was pinned down and shot from close range.
‘Why was CCTV at Tube not working properly?’
In a separate development it was claimed yesterday that CCTV footage of the shooting, vital to the enquiry into his death, will not be available because most of the cameras at the station were not working.
Tube Lines, the company responsible for the maintenance of CCTV on the Underground ,denied the allegation, saying its cameras at Stockwell were working on July 22.
The police have already stated that 24 hours before Mr de Menezes was shot, three of the four bombings suspects had assembled at the station at 12.25pm, suggesting they had confirmation of that fact from security cameras.
Last night both Scotland Yard and London Underground refused to comment on whether cameras had been used to identify the suspects. And the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) which is investigating Mr de Menezes’s death, said only: ‘We have all the evidence that is available.’
But Harriet Wistrich, the lawyer representing Mr de Menezes’s family told the Mail on Sunday: ‘It beggars belief that there was no CCTV at Stockwell Tube station at a time when London is on a high security alert. Ever since 7/7 every station should have been fitted with CCTV cameras and they should have been working properly. It begs the question whether we are being given a true and accurate picture of the evidence available.’
The two officers who shot Mr de Menezes - from the Yard’s elite firearms unit, SO19 - face possible prosecution for murder or manslaughter when the investigation is complete. The IPCC’s report, which will take months to compile, will be sent to the Crown prosecution Service. The CPS will decide if the officers should be taken to court. An inquest will also be held.
The day after the shooting it was claimed that Mr de Menezes vaulted over a ticket barrier and sprinted down escalators to escape police. He was also said to have refused to surrender and to have been wearing a bulky winter coat. But it has now been disclosed by witnesses that he used an Oyster travel card to pass through the ticket barrier, and that, at first, he walked to the platform.
It is believed the officers did not properly identify themselves to him. Also, he was not wearing a heavy jacket which might have hidden a potential suicide bomb.
Financial Outrage
Homepage:
http://www.financialoutrage.org.uk/police_story_falling_apart.htm
Comments
Display the following 7 comments