Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Inconsistencies in Official 9-11 Story Resolved by New “Opposite Day Theory”

WG Hahn | 25.08.2005 16:51

(SATIRE) Millions of conspiracy theorists were silenced yesterday as the many gaping holes in the logic of the official story of 9-11 were all but sealed with one stroke when 9-11 Commission Chair Thomas Kean revealed that September 11, 2001 was actually ‘Opposite Day’.

Millions of conspiracy theorists were silenced yesterday as the many gaping holes in the logic of the official story of 9-11 were all but sealed with one stroke when 9-11 Commission Chair Thomas Kean revealed that September 11, 2001 was actually ‘Opposite Day’.

How could three buildings of the World Trade Center, including the 48 story WT7 which wasn’t even struck by a plane, with their formidable internal lattice of forty-plus steel support beams, be felled by a kerosene based jet fuel fire when kerosene burns at 850 °F and steel doesn’t even begin to warp, let alone melt, at temperatures below 2000° F? Many skeptics around the world point to the oddly familiar free fall collapse of the buildings, the complete pulverization of its concrete, and the evidence - including first hand accounts by fireman and other people at the scene - of explosive devices being detonated throughout the buildings and conclude that all three were brought down by controlled demolitions, but Kean disagrees.

“In conformity with the backward laws of Opposite Day, the flames that burned within the buildings of the World Trade Center could have easily reached 2000° F while the melting point of the steel that comprised the infrastructure would have been reduced to 850° F. This easily explains how these buildings were the first of its steel reinforced kind to fall from fire despite the fact that several others, including Philadelphia’s Meridian Plaza building in 1991, have burned far longer at much higher temperatures in the past.”

Kean also added: “And regarding the firemen who radioed reports of secondary explosions throughout the buildings and basements, these transmissions should be translated to mean that no explosions were seen, felt or caused anyone to catch on fire within the towers prior to their collapse. These men were obviously merely obeying the rules of Opposite Day as they apply to verbal discourse, and I should clarify here, not high on drugs as the government previously speculated. Our sincerest apologies to their families for any distress this error might have caused.”

Likewise, the logical and scientific inconsistencies surrounding the 9-11 attack on the Pentagon are also dispelled by the principles of Opposite Day. For example, Kean asserts that this most heavily defended building in the country, with its unparalleled radar system and missile batteries, was able to be broad sided by a clunky Boeing 767 passenger plane traveling a few hundred miles an hour for the precise reason that it doesn’t make normal sense. In addition, the fact that the impact of the 165 foot wide plane left an original hole that was only 16 feet in diameter despite the fact that its resulting detonation was so violent that the entire airliner, including all the aluminum, steel and titanium (melting point 1600° F) that comprised it was spontaneously incinerated becomes satisfactory within the purview of the Opposite Day Theory.

“Not that I need to elaborate to such an extent at this point,” spoke Kean, “But it also bears mentioning that this new revelation effectively solves the anomaly of why it took NORAD so darn long to deploy fighter jets to attempt to intercept the airliners – in the case of the plane that eventually crashed into the Pentagon they took over forty minutes to do so even after the plane diverted radically from its designated flight path and ceased mandatory check-ins subsequent to two other planes being hijacked and used as giant death missiles on the World Trade Center in New York for crying out loud.”

Kean proffered such examples of seemingly irreconcilable deviations from normalcy along with some anecdotal evidence to substantiate the validity of the new theory.

“Is everyone at NORAD just lazy? I assure you they are not. When famous golfer Payne Stewart drifted off course after falling unconscious at the helm of a private plane in 1999 they had fighters scrambled within seven minutes. Are the airport screeners who let each and every one of the twenty-one Arab terrorists with non-Arab names on board airliners in possession of knives, box cutters, guns, gas and gas masks all stupid morons? I don’t care if its before or after 9-11 – you get twenty friends together and try to all successfully board four different planes carrying that kind of gear and see how it works out. How about the terrorists themselves? Why would they go out of their way to hit the east side of the Pentagon when it was being renovated and held few people and no high-ranking officials? What are they, a bunch of idiots? No way, it might feel good to say so, but remember, they hatched and executed this elaborate, diabolical plot that caught us all off guard.”

“I might also mention,” Kean appended, “That it has come to our attention that dozens of steel lanterns belonging to campers were inexplicably melted by their kerosene flames the morning of 9-11. What does all of this tell us? What can the only reasonable explanation be? Opposite Day.”

Kean then concluded his remarks by emphatically addressing the primary implication of the conjecture of most conspiracy theorists that certain members of the US government orchestrated the attacks to serve as a pretext for the commencement of global military campaigns, the curtailment of domestic civil liberties, etc.

“That’s all tin-hat stuff. It might not always seem like it, but our government truly has our best interests at heart, loves us and is only trying to do what’s best.”

WG Hahn
- Homepage: http://www.NewsMutiny.com

Comments

Hide the following 10 comments

Heard it before...

25.08.2005 21:23

"steel doesn’t even begin to warp, let alone melt, at temperatures below 2000° F"

yeah, yeah, yeah. Its all a big conspiracy theory.

That's why every set of statutory building regulations in the western world requires that structural steelwork be protected against fire. Its all a conspiracy between architects and fireproofing contractors. And they bribed the hundreds of thousands of architects, structural engineers, and academics who know about steel in fires to keep quite.

Its all so obvious really. Thank you for pointing it it out.

Paranoid Pete


What's the melting point of steel?

26.08.2005 01:06

That depends on the alloy of steel you are talking about. The term alloy is almost always used incorrectly these days, especially amongst bicyclists. They use the term to mean aluminum. What the term alloy really means is a mixture of metals, any kind of metals. Almost all metal used today is a mixture and therefore an alloy.

Most steel has other metals added to tune its properties, like strength, corrosion resistance, or ease of fabrication. Steel is just the element iron that has been processed to control the amount of carbon. Iron, out of the ground, melts at around 1510 degrees C (2750°F). Steel often melts at around 1370 degrees C (2500°F).

Author: Brian Kross, Chief Detector Engineer

from:  http://education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01.html

Sceptical Sue


Paranoid Pete

26.08.2005 08:24

Are you suggesting that a certain person maniacally reposts rehashed of teh same conspiracy rubbish on IM?


“That’s all tin-hat stuff. It might not always seem like it, but our government truly has our best interests at heart, loves us and is only trying to do what’s best.”

I love the single constant in the argumentation though: "If you don't believe 'A' then it means you believe 'B' and that makes you an idiot. Fuck off! I don't buy either thank you! And from self-professed anti-authoritarians too hahahaha!

Magoo


so then?

26.08.2005 09:42

It was cave dwelling muslims then?

Phew, we can rest easy now.

No more questions [unanswered] about steel and melting temp.

No more questions about:

Simultaneous drills
Bombs - heard and immeadiately reported
Seismic activity independently recorded BEFORE the collapse.
Whilstleblowers in the FBI, CIA, NSA, Port authority etc etc
Inconsistancies in airline passenger lists
Dancing israelis
Huge fortunes gambled and won that day on the stock exchange
Pre-prepared patriot acts (10 000+ page)
Pre-prepared invasion plans (iraq & afghani) by halliburton and unicol
Executives all out of town at the hour
Early warnings to 'special' people
Super fast disposal of the debris (evidence)
etc
etc
ect

The sceptic[sic] brigade has spoken, do not keep going on about mass murder and the changing forever of our rights and democratic aspirations

We are under attack, rally round the flag.

God save bush and paranoid pete.

head up my arse


yeah but, no but...

26.08.2005 10:07

Perhaps it would be of interest for those who are supposedly sceptical to acknowledge the fact that the pancake theory was formulated within 24 hours of the collapse of the wtc towers, by none other than the new york times. If you dont believe that then buy a copy of the paper from the day after on ebay (a work colleague of mine did, and i got to see it with me own peepers). It seems strange does it not that the initial theory which was NOT based on any scientific or crime scene study has stuck, even though there is no conclusive evidence to support it. It would appear that some of the more msm compliant individuals who post here are just as naive as those who religiously believe every word that david icke churns out. But i suppose, if you believe the new york times is the worlds foremost architectural authority....then the world REALLY could be run by reptiles, chuckle:D

And, PP, you wrote "And they bribed the hundreds of thousands of architects, structural engineers, and academics who know about steel in fires to keep quite."

well, no, that wouldnt need to happen. "they" would merely have to deny them a forum for airing their opinions, and since most people rely upon the msm for information, shutting them out from it means that the only place you would hear about these rogue architects etc, would be on sites like this. Cue tirade of insults questioning my sanity (yawn)


Billy goats gruff


Same old tosh tarted up for another outing...

26.08.2005 11:22

" It would appear that some of the more msm compliant individuals who post here are just as naive as those who religiously believe every word that david icke churns out."

Aw diddums, just because we don't believe you? LOL!

I remember reading somewhere that there was some bodge made when they built the towers, Something to do with sticking in wood where they should have metal... can't remember the details.

You know the more you repeat a conspiracy theory doesn't increase the chances of us believing it. Perhaps if you dug up something new, like someone actually having proof of the conspiracy with names and evidence to back it up we might take it seriously. No-one has ever proved the explosives theory, they have only mooted it.

Sure it's interesting but it's hardly the COINTELPRO telephone tap transcripts or an exhumed grave. Most of us, probably including yourself, don't have the expertise to understand either argument fully. The one thing I do understand is that for such a large conspiracy no-one involved has squealed... and we're nearly 4 years down the line. How do you explain that one?

And I don't mean people who THINK that something was amiss. I mean people that KNEW have failed to surface and that's unusual. Now that's a tight ship if it was a grand conspiracy.

Merry old Magoo


Preemptive Report

26.08.2005 17:05

The previous owners of the WTC bought the Sears Tower in Chicago, a likely target for the next attack. Signs to watch for are the arrival of FEMA for a "drill."

U Get Me?


Away havers!

26.08.2005 18:59

"No more questions [unanswered] about steel and melting temp. "

Oh where to start?

I for one am mightily intrigued as to what these oft-quoted unanswered questions are - presumably that old chestnut about steel not melting. Well, lets look at some building regulations.

The Scottish Regs, section D, are a bit detailed -  http://www.scotland.gov.uk/build_regs/sect-d.pdf - but you'll notice do flag up the need for fire protection in structural components and steelwork.

In England, Part B of the Regs flags up a similar position - its not available on-line free but Corus (who know a thing about steel) have a useful and relatively non-technical summary at  http://www.corusconstruction.com/legacy/fire/images/fireres_section1.pdf . Some of you will note on page 5 the admission that most unportected steel sections only have fire integrity for about 15 minutes.

The Canadian Regs aren't available on-line free either, but their national buildings institute flags up across all their documents the risk posed by fire and the need for protection - see, by way of example,  http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cbd/cbd071e.html .

The New Zealand and Australian steel codes, (SNZ, 1997 and SAA 1990) are very
similar to each other. The NZ regs section C4 requires....wait for it......structural protection of steel in fire ( http://www.building.govt.nz)

Now what is required to protect steel against even a domestic fire for, say, half an hour. British Gypsum give us a useful summary, but similar advice permeats construction advice around the globe: http://www.british-gypsum.bpb.co.uk/pdf/wb_bsc%20prin_07_05.pdf. Note the opening comments on page 14 and then the page after page of details necessary to provide fire protection at the end. You'll see BG also do seperate systems to encase and protect steel beams.

Further afield, a lot of bodies and firms focus on the fire performance of steel:

 http://www.shef.ac.uk/fire-research/steelinfire/previous_meetings.html
 http://www.corusconstruction.com/page_1416.htm
 http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/866/CIB_W14/workprog.htm (you'll like this one, engineers)

Then we have this helpful thesis by an engineer in NZ:

 http://www.civil.canterbury.ac.nz/fire/pdfreports/KLewis.pdf

Note in particular the strength/temperature/yield grading charts


I can go on, but its getting too like a day at the office. But one of the comments above suggested that dissent from the construction professions might have been stifled. I put it to you that the performance of steel in fire and need for protection to prevent catastrophic failure in fires is universally acknowledged. Any consipracy would involve not thousands, or tens of thousands, but hundreds of thousands of architects, engineers, surveyors, contractors, building control officers, and steel manufacturers the world over. It is not only incredible (in the dictionary sense) but wholly implausable.

Yet time and time again we see the same old conspiracy theories rehashed. The theorists cannot come up with cogent, meaningful responses. Its government stool pigeons. Its stiffled opposition. Its spooks on Indymedia.

Rubbish. Its woolly thinking and unsupported hypothethis which is debunked by anyone with a basic understanding of evidencial issues and the brains to think things through.


Paranoid Pete


Never let the facts get in the way of a conspiracy theory

26.08.2005 19:15

"No more questions [unanswered] about steel and melting temp. "

Oh where to start?

I for one am mightily intrigued as to what these oft-quoted unanswered questions are - presumably that old chestnut about steel not melting. Well, lets look at some building regulations.

The Scottish Regs, section D, are a bit detailed -  http://www.scotland.gov.uk/build_regs/sect-d.pdf - but you'll notice do flag up the need for fire protection in structural components and steelwork.

In England, Part B of the Regs flags up a similar position - its not available on-line free but Corus (who know a thing about steel) have a useful and relatively non-technical summary at  http://www.corusconstruction.com/legacy/fire/images/fireres_section1.pdf . Some of you will note on page 5 the admission that most unportected steel sections only have fire integrity for about 15 minutes.

The Canadian Regs aren't available on-line free either, but their national buildings institute flags up across all their documents the risk posed by fire and the need for protection - see, by way of example,  http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cbd/cbd071e.html .

The New Zealand and Australian steel codes, (SNZ, 1997 and SAA 1990) are very
similar to each other. The NZ regs section C4 requires....wait for it......structural protection of steel in fire ( http://www.building.govt.nz)

Now what is required to protect steel against even a domestic fire for, say, half an hour. British Gypsum give us a useful summary, but similar advice permeats construction advice around the globe: http://www.british-gypsum.bpb.co.uk/pdf/wb_bsc%20prin_07_05.pdf. Note the opening comments on page 14 and then the page after page of details necessary to provide fire protection at the end. You'll see BG also do seperate systems to encase and protect steel beams.

Further afield, a lot of bodies and firms focus on the fire performance of steel:

 http://www.shef.ac.uk/fire-research/steelinfire/previous_meetings.html
 http://www.corusconstruction.com/page_1416.htm
 http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/866/CIB_W14/workprog.htm (you'll like this one, engineers)

Then we have this helpful thesis by an engineer in NZ:

 http://www.civil.canterbury.ac.nz/fire/pdfreports/KLewis.pdf

Note in particular the strength/temperature/yield grading charts


I can go on, but its getting too like a day at the office. But one of the comments above suggested that dissent from the construction professions might have been stifled. I put it to you that the performance of steel in fire and need for protection to prevent catastrophic failure in fires is universally acknowledged. Any consipracy would involve not thousands, or tens of thousands, but hundreds of thousands of architects, engineers, surveyors, contractors, building control officers, and steel manufacturers the world over. It is not only incredible (in the dictionary sense) but wholly implausable.

Yet time and time again we see the same old conspiracy theories rehashed. The theorists cannot come up with cogent, meaningful responses. Its government stool pigeons. Its stiffled opposition. Its spooks on Indymedia.

Rubbish. Its woolly thinking and unsupported hypothethis which is debunked by anyone with a basic understanding of evidencial issues and the brains to think things through.

Paranoid Pete


Paranoid Pete

27.08.2005 16:17

Do you reckon they meet up somewhere and plan a schedule of when they will post various rehashes of the same old crud? Is this what conspiracy loons do to tread water between real events to bandwagon??? Is Aled Jones on holiday???

I fail to see the point of constantly reposting old news, irrespective of whether it's genuine or dubious.

Thanks for all that info... not that any of means anything to a linguist, but I get the gist of your point. Hahahaha!

magoo


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech