Complaint to the BBC: Re London 7/7 attacks
Bridget Dunne | 03.12.2005 00:56 | Terror War
Complaint to the BBC re:: Horizon 27/10/05
Based on the information I have discovered about the train times on 7/7 and this article by The Antagonist, I have decided to challenge the media on their deceitful reporting of events. Along with the Freedom of Information Act, the Press Complaints Commission allow citizens like myself who are concerned with the truth, to challenge those in authority. This is somethng we ALL can do.
Based on the information I have discovered about the train times on 7/7 and this article by The Antagonist, I have decided to challenge the media on their deceitful reporting of events. Along with the Freedom of Information Act, the Press Complaints Commission allow citizens like myself who are concerned with the truth, to challenge those in authority. This is somethng we ALL can do.
Complaint to the BBC re:: Horizon 27/10/05
Based on the information I have discovered about the train times on 7/7 and this article by The Antagonist, I have decided to challenge the media on their deceitful reporting of events. Along with the Freedom of Information Act, the Press Complaints Commission allow citizens like myself who are concerned with the truth, to challenge those in authority. This is somethng we ALL can do.
Horizon, trumpeted by the Beeb as their flagship science programme, graphically reported and reconstructed the so-called bombers movements from Luton Thameslink station. The information they gave was false.
I am awaiting a reply from the BBC to the following complaint:
On a recent Horizon programme entitled "The 7/7 Bombers – A Psychological Investigation What makes someone want to blow themselves – and others - up?", the presenter clearly states with graphic images of digital clocks the following incorrect information:
The so-called bombers caught the 7.48 from Luton, they arrived at Kings X at 8.26 and separated at 8.30 at Kings X underground.
According to the released time tables from Luton the 7.48 was running 20 minutes late and arrived at Kings X at 8.42, making it impossible for these young men to have carried out the attacks as shown in your documentary. In fact no train left Luton that morning at 7.48.
You state on the BBC website that Horizon is BBC Two's flagship 50-minute science documentary series, surely you would check these facts before showing a forensic psychologist making the supposedly same journey as we are told these 4 young men did?
I emailed Horizon but have as yet received no reply, I would like this factually incorrect information to be aknowledged and publicly corrected.
The more complaints that the BBC receive from those concerned with the truth, the nearer we may be to exposing this mass deceit and subsequent cover-up.
http://bridgetdunnes.blogspot.com/
Based on the information I have discovered about the train times on 7/7 and this article by The Antagonist, I have decided to challenge the media on their deceitful reporting of events. Along with the Freedom of Information Act, the Press Complaints Commission allow citizens like myself who are concerned with the truth, to challenge those in authority. This is somethng we ALL can do.
Horizon, trumpeted by the Beeb as their flagship science programme, graphically reported and reconstructed the so-called bombers movements from Luton Thameslink station. The information they gave was false.
I am awaiting a reply from the BBC to the following complaint:
On a recent Horizon programme entitled "The 7/7 Bombers – A Psychological Investigation What makes someone want to blow themselves – and others - up?", the presenter clearly states with graphic images of digital clocks the following incorrect information:
The so-called bombers caught the 7.48 from Luton, they arrived at Kings X at 8.26 and separated at 8.30 at Kings X underground.
According to the released time tables from Luton the 7.48 was running 20 minutes late and arrived at Kings X at 8.42, making it impossible for these young men to have carried out the attacks as shown in your documentary. In fact no train left Luton that morning at 7.48.
You state on the BBC website that Horizon is BBC Two's flagship 50-minute science documentary series, surely you would check these facts before showing a forensic psychologist making the supposedly same journey as we are told these 4 young men did?
I emailed Horizon but have as yet received no reply, I would like this factually incorrect information to be aknowledged and publicly corrected.
The more complaints that the BBC receive from those concerned with the truth, the nearer we may be to exposing this mass deceit and subsequent cover-up.
http://bridgetdunnes.blogspot.com/
Bridget Dunne
Comments
Hide the following 22 comments
No, really...
03.12.2005 02:45
Yawn.
CFH
Yes, really.
03.12.2005 07:45
Me.
Sinister new world order conspiracy
03.12.2005 08:40
Nazymedia really is excelling itself with this nutcake thread.
Nazymedia
the point of the thread mr nazy...
03.12.2005 10:20
jimbo
good work!
03.12.2005 10:24
Keep up the good work!
dirk
Nazymedia really is excelling itself with this nutcake thread.
03.12.2005 10:46
You seem too dumb to even understand what open publishing is, despite the fact you use Indymedias webspace and software to attack them.
Hopefully they'll use their software to filter you out.
Shum Mishtake shurely
Focus Is Interesting
03.12.2005 22:34
Editors, Keep Close Tabs On This Plant's Activities
Good Work Bridget!
03.12.2005 23:24
All the people who who want to keep this information hidden can do, is pay some hacks to try to discredit independent citizen researchers by appeal to prejudice against "conspiracy theorists". These petty and bogus attacks wear thin with time, we can see who is seeking the truth and who isn't.
Bridget's quest for the holy grail of truth can easily survive such stupid insults. Rock on!
Dancing Dave
e-mail:
davidk@oz-online.net
A very important story
04.12.2005 03:56
'"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said.'
brian
uphold holes and other paranoid fanatasies
04.12.2005 13:05
sceptic
Here's the 7/7 conspiracy website
04.12.2005 13:52
Quote: "A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th."
Concerned
And here's another
04.12.2005 21:37
and don't forget
Have a look.
jimbo
Sceptic troll
04.12.2005 22:19
brian
And don't forget these please
04.12.2005 23:11
never mind the trolls here's some meat.
jimbo
The policeman mentioned the hole
05.12.2005 13:44
Even if the police notice it, the ambulance men, the London Underground men all notice it ... no one thinks this is odd? None of these people say anythihng to the papers? Or to the inquest? Perhaps THEY are all ZIONISTS too.
sceptic
Timetable anomalies
05.12.2005 14:51
This is scarcely damning evidence of a cover up.
As for the bomb hole. People are always referring to this one eye-witness account out of the hundreds of accounts that make no mention of 'upturned edges'. If the particular bomb went off near a seat (bolted to the floor) the subsequent upward blast may well have turned some of the metal edge upwards. At the end of the day, neither me or the eyewitness concerned are experts in ballistics, so this too remains an isolated fragment of an issue that has been given an emphasis that it scarcely merits.
Curious
Bliar's Theory Still Unproven
06.12.2005 06:20
So where's the "damning evidence" of the Government's Conspiracy Theory, the one Bliar used to seize powers denied him by the courts for four years?
See, that's missing, and that's troubling.
Not to mention that Bliar said an investigation would be a "ludicrous distraction" (what if the police said that about EVERY crime?).
Sorta like Bush and 911 ...
The evidence of the coverup is the coverup, Dummy!!
A Liar Lies, Even When He Speaks The Truth
Lets be honest...
06.12.2005 08:18
'The evidence of the coverup is the coverup, Dummy'
This is not a particularly logical argument as you have failed to prove that there is a cover up. Whatever shortfalls in the official view you perceive there to be does not, in itself, 'prove' any alternative explanation at all. And kindly refrain from petulant name calling, simply because I happen to disagree with you.
Curious
Circular Logic (or not)
06.12.2005 19:10
What a GREAT argument!
Martians stole my car? No proof? That's the proof!
Faked Lunar Landings? No proof? It must be a consipracy
Birmingham Five guilty? No proof? That's the proof!
Tell me though, seriously, if there's no proof (because of the cover-up, of course), then how did you manage to discern that a conspiracy existed?
Amused
No, sceptic
07.12.2005 01:36
sceptic
he does mentioned its upturned edges....Its the only press account that has appeared, and in a small newspaper. Has the media failed to notice it?or do the prefer 'the evil arabs did it'?
brian
one policeman noticed it?
07.12.2005 10:36
sceptic
sceptic
07.12.2005 22:01
The evidence for the suicide bombing theory is zero...but its what people choose to believe: its what theyve been led to believe. Like the americans, many would find it hard to accept that the bombs were placed by security personnel. And guess who handles security for british rail?
brian