Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Stonehenge: 12 environmental groups reject latest road plans

Chris Woodford | 30.01.2006 19:32

The British government has just (January 2006) announced five new options for upgrading the A303 road through the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. But environmental groups are unanimously opposing them.

12 Environmental groups unanimously reject government plans for new roads at Stonehenge

News release: For immediate release: Tuesday 24 January 2006

Yesterday's government announcement [1] of new road proposals to solve traffic problems at Stonehenge has now been rejected by 12 environmental groups: the National Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB); Transport 2000, Friends of the Earth, Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), Stonehenge Alliance (representing FoE, CPRE, Transport 2000, Ancient Sacred Landscapes Network, Pagan Federation, RESCUE - the British Archaeological Trust), Save Stonehenge!, International Council On Monuments and Sites UK (ICOMOS-UK), Council for British Archaeology (CBA), and the Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural Heritage Society (WANHS).

The groups, representing archaeology, nature conservation, sustainable transport, and other environmental issues, have swiftly rejected five "new" options for the A303 road, which passes near the Stonehenge World Heritage Site:

The National Trust, which owns much of the land around the central stone circle, rejected all five options. In its press release of 23rd January, it said:

"With its publication of the consultation document for the A303 Road Proposals Options Review for Stonehenge, the Government has failed one of the world's most famous landscapes. The five options outlined in the Review and the consultative process by which the Government arrived at this decision, focus on transport solutions for Stonehenge which denigrate its status as a World Heritage Site. These schemes will not return the world famous stones to the tranquillity they deserve and threaten to damage valuable archaeology.

Any hopes we may have had - following the Government’s announcements of 20 July and 31 October - that the Review would identify the shortlist of options to guarantee Stonehenge's future, have been disappointed. We believe that none of the five options put forward by Government are acceptable. Furthermore, we do not believe that the shortlist of options for further detailed consideration represent the full range of alternatives.

The Government has failed both to undertake a detailed review of the options and to consult environmental and heritage organisations at a stage of the process which would afford a real opportunity to input into this Review.

There are alternative options for Stonehenge which may be both preferable and less expensive than those outlined by the Government which should have been included in the review to date. We call on the Government to make creative use of the 13 week consultation period, which follows their announcement, to give serious consideration to all options and move forward on alternative options that would offer Stonehenge the world class future its status requires."

Read the full press release. For further information, contact the National Trust: Ivo Dawnay Director of Communications: 01793 817703; 07909 925041 Julian Lloyd, Head of Media: 020 7152 4530; 07768 700976

Other groups were similarly dismissive:

* Tony Richardson, Director of RSPB South-West Region said: "A completely new road through the Stonehenge site is unthinkable not only because of its obvious archaeological value but also because of the public outcry it will spark amongst the millions of people who value Britain's wildlife. It is less than six months since we hit targets for stone-curlew recovery both nationally and in the south-west, where one third of the UK's population is found. Approval for any over-ground route will make a mockery of the government's desire to get this mysterious and vulnerable bird back on its feet." Full press release:  http://www.rspb.org.uk/action/stonehenge.asp

* Stephen Joseph, OBE, Executive Director of Transport 2000 said: "All the options presented appear to involve significant damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site or to neighbouring heritage and wildlife sites. But this is fantasy road building anyway because there is no money to do any significant projects of this sort."  http://www.transport2000.org.uk T2000 press/communications: Steve Hounsham: 0207-613 0743

* Mike Birkin of Friends of the Earth (FoE) South West said: "The choices on the table are not new and they are still not acceptable. The choice seems to be between damaging this valuable World Heritage Site now or damaging it later." Friends of the Earth South West  http://www.foe.co.uk/ Contact: Mike Birkin, 0117 942 0128

* Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) Head of Transport Policy, Paul Hamblin, said: "After years of prevarication we are right back where we started, with a set of schemes whose environmental price is too high. Money is of course limited, but with persuasive arguments more should be found for this World Heritage Site which is such a powerful icon of the English countryside." Full press release:  http://www.cpre.org.uk/news-releases/news-rel-2006/04.06.htm

* Dr Kate Fielden, Secretary of the Stonehenge Alliance (representing FoE, CPRE, Transport 2000, Ancient Sacred Landscapes Network, Pagan Federation, RESCUE - the British Archaeological Trust), said: "The announcement of options for the A303 Improvement at Stonehenge is disappointing. The reviewers have come up with five options, four of which take us back more than a decade and indicate that the Government's priority at Stonehenge continues to be a road improvement that would leave the archaeological landscape of the World Heritage Site severely damaged for ever." Full press statement:  http://www.savestonehenge.org.uk/alliancepress230106.html

* Chris Woodford, spokesman for pressure group Save Stonehenge!, said: "These new options are reheated leftovers from the 1990s. They're a world away from the bold, creative, thinking that Stonehenge really needs. Europe's greatest monument deserves a respectful, sustainable solution that puts the integrity of the World Heritage Site above the needs of motorists." Full press release:  http://www.savestonehenge.org.uk/ssnr230106.html

* International Council On Monuments and Sites UK (ICOMOS-UK), the Council for British Archaeology (CBA), and the Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural Heritage Society (WANHS) issued a joint statement:

"Today’s announcement of the five options to be discussed in the review process for the A303 road through the Stonehenge landscape, with details of how that process is to be conducted, falls far short of serious consideration of possible alternative schemes that are appropriate for this iconic World Heritage site. ICOMOS-UK, the CBA and WANHS strongly support the National Trust's views, as set out in their Press Release today. We are dismayed that the National Trust, as the country's key conservation and environmental organisation, as well as the owner of land that would be affected by most of the proposed options, has not been offered so far any opportunity to shape this review. Our three organisations welcomed the announcement made by the Roads Minister in July 2005, of a detailed review of possible options for the A303 road at Stonehenge, as a constructive way forward. However, in the event the process so far has been flawed by failure to engage the essential stakeholders or to look at the full range of appropriate alternative options. ICOMOS-UK, the CBA and the WANHS consider that the review options now being offered amount to a token consultation lacking a long-term vision that respects the international significance of Stonehenge as a World Heritage Site. We urge the Review Group to consider other preferable options that would better reflect the status and value of the overall Stonehenge landscape."

Contacts: ICOMOS-UK, 70 Cowcross Street, London ES1M 6EJ 020 7566 0031, email:  admin@icomos-uk.org; Council for British Archaeology, St Mary’s House, 66 Bootham, York YO1 7BZ 01904 671417 email:  info@britarch.ac.uk; Wiltshire Archaeological & Natural History Society, 41 Long Street, Devizes, Wiltshire SN10 1NS 01380 727369, email:  wanhs@wiltshireheritage.org.uk

Notes to editors

1. Details of the latest government proposals can be found on the Highways Agency website:  http://www.highways.gov.uk/news/newsroom.aspx?newsid=15139370
2. This news release summarizes views from news releases issued by the individual groups. It is not issued on behalf of these groups.
3. Issued by Save Stonehenge! For media contacts, please see our press page.

Chris Woodford
- e-mail: info@savestonehenge.org.uk
- Homepage: http://www.savestonehenge.org.uk/

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech