NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
c. prince | 07.03.2006 16:27 | Analysis | Indymedia | Repression | World
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
TOO MANY OF THE TENANTS OF THE TRUST ARE SUFFERING
THE CHAIRMAN SEEMS TO PREFER PROMOTING HOMOSEXUALITY AND RACE ISSUES - DIVIDING COMMUNITIES - RATHER THAN PROVIDING GOOD HOUSING AND EFFECTIVE REPAIRS IN NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST PROPERTIES
AS TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE - THE PRETTY BLONDE CHIEF EXECUTIVE APPEARS TO RELY TOO MUCH ON HER LOOKS AND GIVES PRIORITY TO LOOKS AND NOT SORTING OUT THE VERY GRAVE PROBLEMS THAT NOW BESET MOST NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST TENANTS
PERHAPS THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT FOCUS TOO MUCH ON THEIR LUXURY LIFESTYLES, THEIR PALATIAL HOUSES, THEIR LUXURY CARS AND THEIR OVER INFLATED EXPENSE CLAIMS AT EXHORBITANTLY PRICED UP MARKET RESTAURANTS AND FASHION BOUTIQUES TO BE SEEN WITH THEIR LABOUR PARTY PALS AT HARVEY NICKS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS PROMOTIONS FOR CHARITY OR 'CHARIDEE' OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST AND THE 21 CHARITY SHOPS OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IN THE MOST EXPENSIVE LOCATIONS OF LONDON - HAMPSTEAD HIGH STREET, SAINT JOHN'S WOOD, HIGH STREET KENSINGTON, BAYSWATER AND NOTTING HILL GATE.
YET NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP APPEARS TO CHARGE SOME OF THE HIGHEST RENTS IN THE COUNTRY!
A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS URGENTLY CALLED FOR, TO HOLD TO ACCOUNT THE SHARP AND DECEITFUL PRACTICES OF THE MANAGEMENT OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
UNTIL THE TRUST IS THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED BY A TRANSPARENTLY ACCOUNTABLE AUTHORITY THE TENANTS OF NOTTING HILL HOUSIONG TRUST WILL CONTINUE TO HAVE NO FAITH IN THE MANAGEMENT.
TOO MANY OF THE TENANTS OF THE TRUST ARE SUFFERING
THE CHAIRMAN SEEMS TO PREFER PROMOTING HOMOSEXUALITY AND RACE ISSUES - DIVIDING COMMUNITIES - RATHER THAN PROVIDING GOOD HOUSING AND EFFECTIVE REPAIRS IN NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST PROPERTIES
AS TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE - THE PRETTY BLONDE CHIEF EXECUTIVE APPEARS TO RELY TOO MUCH ON HER LOOKS AND GIVES PRIORITY TO LOOKS AND NOT SORTING OUT THE VERY GRAVE PROBLEMS THAT NOW BESET MOST NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST TENANTS
PERHAPS THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT FOCUS TOO MUCH ON THEIR LUXURY LIFESTYLES, THEIR PALATIAL HOUSES, THEIR LUXURY CARS AND THEIR OVER INFLATED EXPENSE CLAIMS AT EXHORBITANTLY PRICED UP MARKET RESTAURANTS AND FASHION BOUTIQUES TO BE SEEN WITH THEIR LABOUR PARTY PALS AT HARVEY NICKS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS PROMOTIONS FOR CHARITY OR 'CHARIDEE' OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST AND THE 21 CHARITY SHOPS OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IN THE MOST EXPENSIVE LOCATIONS OF LONDON - HAMPSTEAD HIGH STREET, SAINT JOHN'S WOOD, HIGH STREET KENSINGTON, BAYSWATER AND NOTTING HILL GATE.
YET NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP APPEARS TO CHARGE SOME OF THE HIGHEST RENTS IN THE COUNTRY!
A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS URGENTLY CALLED FOR, TO HOLD TO ACCOUNT THE SHARP AND DECEITFUL PRACTICES OF THE MANAGEMENT OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
UNTIL THE TRUST IS THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED BY A TRANSPARENTLY ACCOUNTABLE AUTHORITY THE TENANTS OF NOTTING HILL HOUSIONG TRUST WILL CONTINUE TO HAVE NO FAITH IN THE MANAGEMENT.
c. prince
e-mail:
c_prince@hotmail.com
Comments
Hide the following 77 comments
Notting Hill Housing Trust
12.03.2006 00:24
James
e-mail:
Fairwood
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
15.03.2006 17:45
Clearly they are not appreciated by some in authority.
Thre truth can indeed be painful.
Why not Communicate and Consult.... with the good tenants that have raised legitmate complaints in writing?
Tactics of Confrontation is never the answer... it is a recipe for a major disaster
charles prince
e-mail:
c_prince@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
18.03.2006 16:50
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
Is there was a fearless and truly independent and probing press in this country?
If there was, serious probing questions would be DEMANDED from the PRIME MINISTER concerning the UNETHICAL actions of the flagship Registerd Social Landlord - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - the entity that serves as the generator of housing and LABOUR PARTY polital policy [through the writings of GERARD LEMOS - LORD TOM SAWYER - JOHN PRESCOTT's Department known as Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) - TONY BLAIR] to all other RSLs that provide housing to all local authorities around the country.
We all know of the 'LOANS' that are in fact disguised DONATIONS which the Treasurer of the LABOUR PARTY and NEC - JACK DROMEY - husband of HARRIET HARMAN - responsible for electoral isues [and the ALL important votes to win power] does not know about.
A secret TONY BLAIR and Lord MICHAEL LEVY [the ex Chartered Accountant] production.
Mr 'Cash-Point' [LABOUR PARTY PEER - MICHAEL LEVY] for the LABOUR PARTY - Donations ['LOANS'] in return for LABOUR PEERAGES.
Yet the Treasurer of the LABOUR PARTY - [taken over by 'the cuckoo' in the nest TONY BLAIR that has compromised LABOUR PARTY policies] - JACK DROMEY knows nothing about these secret funds - yet there will never ever be a prosecution for FALSE ACCOUNTING - because the friend of CHERIE BOOTH or is it CHERIE BLAIR recommended her friend and ex colleague who set up MATRIX CHAMBERS to be in charge of deciding on who will get PROSECUTED in the UK - as head of the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS) - known as the DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (DPP) KEN MACDONALD. This all sounds like a GREAT NIGHTMARE.
BUT what is happening at the heart of Government in the UK under the direction of TONY BLAIR is happening at the very heart of the flagship registered social landlord - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - the man appointed to head it up was LORD TOM SAWYER ex CHAIRMAN of the LABOUR PARTY after he was given a LABOUR PEERAGE by TONY BLAIR in 1998. He had previously been in charge of NATIONAL UNION of PUBLIC EMPLOYEES known as UNISON to make sure no strikes would take place from his union to detract TONY BLAIR's project.
The mission of LORD TOM SAWYER [an extremely good friend of TONY BLAIR and MICHAEL LEVY later LORD MICHAEL LEVY and the mentor of his protege GERARD LEMOS] was to sort out to the vote for TONY BLAIR. This was done by the provision of HOUSING in marginal constituencies - known as GERRYMANDERING.
After he was discredited by the misappropriation of as substantial amount of Charitable Trust properties PETER REDMAN, the Chief Executive, hurriedly followed by LORD TOM SAWYER stood down as Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and he made sure his successor was his protege, the senior LABOUR PARTY member that was groomed by him - whose origins are from INDIA - GERARD LEMOS.
Like the wife of JACK DROMEY - HARRIET HARMAN MP, GERARD LEMOS had gone to YORK UNIVERSITY. On the website of University of YORK it appears there is surprise that GERARD LEMOS was accelerated through the most senior appointments. This was all arranged by LORD TOM SAWYER who liked GERARD LEMOS as he provided the money for the reasearch that LORD TOM SAWYER needed to try to ensure key sectors of the electorate elected TONY BLAIR for another term by means of the 'right' vote - but also by means of the arrangement of HOUSING from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - it provides properties for LOCAL AUTHORITIES and decides who gets elected.
The evidence of so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants indicate that the policies of GERARD LEMOS are in practice those of reverse discrimination.
I am only too aware that these cowardly bullying pratices operated by senior management have been perpetrated on far too many vulnerable sociable and law abiding reasonable tenants who have written complaints to the senior management but those senior management do not answer or acknowledge their letters because any answer would incriminate the senior management.
I and so many others have seen through the REALITY of what GERARD LEMOS is now doing - as core LABOUR PARTY policy yp GERRYMANDER the vote and to deny it to all other political parties in the upcoming local elections on 6 MAY 2006.
Now it is time for the media, the politicians and the electorate to see through this great web of mismanagement, political gerrymandering and sleaze.
So anyone from YORK UNIVERSITY who might be naive and believes the site of YORK UNIVERSITY without reading around the subject of GERARD LEMOS and believes that it comes as 'a surprise' that GERARD LEMOS was 'surprisingly' promoted to the most senior appointrments that compromises any inspection of his chairmanship of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST do not be deceived. This is all PUBLIC RELATIONS and SPIN.
The site represents: "Gerard Lemos sits composed and relaxed across the table. Smartly dressed, and with an accent the Queen herself would approve of, [YET WOULD THE QUEEN AND?OR HER HUSBAND EVER APPROVE OF THE POLICIES OF GERARD LEMOS IF SHE OR HER FAMILY WERE EVER MADE AWARE OF SUCH POLICIES? I WONDER IF SHE MIGHT REFER TO THEM AS BLATANT TREACHERY - TREASON?] he carries the air of a self made man perfectly at home moving in high circles. Gerard’s life has been lucky, he says as much himself, as his particular skills and experiences have been in demand since Labour won power in 1997. But there is also truth in the old adage that you often create your own luck and a quick overview of Gerard’s career shows that he’s always been in the right place at the right time, which to quote a well known phrase “is more than lucky.”."
THINK FIRST!
There is a very good reason for such very senior appointments to GERARD LEMOS - they were through the personal patronage of LORD TOM SAWYER of CATFORD - ex CHAIRMAN of the LABOUR PARTY. He it was who [in breach of charity law for a political purpose] gave charity funds from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to GERARD LEMOS who lives with his male lover [PAUL CRANE] behind POND SQUARE at his smart exclusive house at 7 BISHAM GARDENS, behind POND SQUARE, very close to his plush offices at the top of Archway Hill. His mother would indeed be shocked of his private life.
What an example GERARD LEMOS sets and yet he advises so many CHARITIES incuding those concerned with vulnerable FAMILIES and even more vulnerable CHILDREN!
What is more GERARD LEMOS is promoted as some kind of 'wunderkind' by LORD TOM SAWYER - LORD NEIL KINNOCK and TONY BLAIR as 'OUR MAN'!
Yet the REALITY as discoverable by speaking to countless insprational tenants who write legitimate complaints to NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST by the senior management is that GERARD LEMOS is not the man he appears to be. Their letters raising vital issues of legitimate complaint are not answered or even acknowledged. Yet there is more than enough proof that the letters were delivered. The management then react with hostility and put the tenants in RENT ARREARS and then apply to the local court of the tenant to EVICT the TENANT. To add to the confrontational tactics of his organization a 'TENANT FROM HELL' is placed next to the pleasant and sociable tenant and the 'TENANT FROM HELL' is supported by the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST whereas the inspirational tenant is undermined by the senior management.
The management then try to harass the tenant by sending out numerous complaint forms and more unnecessary forms to try to goad the good tenant and insist that officials from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST visit the property to conduct inspections to glean the 'necessary' evidence to then attack the complaining tenant, tenant audit forms are then personally delivered and it is insted that tenants MUST be at the property at specifidc times. The management representative then sends two staff to support each other with the 'necessary' evidence and 'find' breaches of the tenancy agreement, whatever the minor detail.
Yet the TENANTS FROM HELL are supported and though they might be involved in drug dealing or might suffer mental trauma and act in an ANTI SOCIAL way to the good pleasant sociable and inspirational tenant the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST conveniently [for them] misrepresent and subvert the roles which are conveniently reversed by NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
It is so transparent - so very pellucid - so blatantly obvious - when more and more tenants are seen and the very same tactics are observed as an independent outsider:
The PERCEPTION from the convenient NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST fiction is that the Real VICTIM is the Apparent PERPETRATOR.
The REALITY from the convenient NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST fiction is that the Percieved PERPETRATOR is the Real VICTIM.
Too many vulnerable victims are suffering in silence who now have witnesses who will testify on oath to the courts if necessary and to significant others asserting that these are the USUAL methods employed to any upstanding tenant who has raised legitimate complaints in writing to the senior management of their landlords!
The more it happens the more proof is gained!
To understand GERARD LEMOS is to understand he is THE policy supplier and policy implementer to effect the votes for TONY BLAIR through an illusion which cannot be ever divulged to the ELECTORATE of the UK.
HOUSING = VOTES
Who controls access to Housing controls the Votes!
That is why the Lord Chancellor - Charles Falconer - Tony Blair's ex flat-mate and close pal left the Lord Chancellor's Department for a short spell to reform Housing through the DETR.
Just like Harriet Harman was given responsibility in the Department of Constitutional Afffairs for amongst other things ELECTIONS.
As to GERARD LEMOS, the way to gain so many senior political appointments is through the power of patronage that links back to one office - that of PRIME MINISTER!
Just as the LABOUR PARTY accounts with donations translated as 'loans' the LABOUR PARTY accounts are in a total mess! [But it is easier to control things that way - lack of transparency and a total lack of accountability - with no integrity and mounting sleaze!]
Rather like the total lack of accountability of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST?
Rather like the perception that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a 'good' CHARITY?
It is now clear we live in a VERY sick and an increasingly CORRUPT society.
It becomes more understandble as TONY BLAIR and his cronies appear to control matters without any form of moral integrity, transparency or accountability.
The senior Labour Labour Party members [cronies]:
TONY BLIAR?
[Lord] NEIL KINNOCK?
[Lord] TOM SAWYER?
GERARD LEMOS?
The lawyers [or is it the 'liars'?]:
CHARLES FALCONER?
PETER GOLDSMITH?
MIKE O'BRIEN?
KEN MACDONALD?
HARRIET HARMAN?
CHERIE BLAIR?
Compare with the SADDAM HUSSEIN DICTATORSHIP [he started with a Law degree]?
How did ADOLF HITLER's [he was Jewish] NAZI [National SOCIALIST] Germany start?
How did JOSEF STALIN's Russia start? [COMMUNIST]
How did MAO TSE TUNG's China start? [COMMUNIST]
The Reality of Chairman MAO:
Mao Tse-tung may be the most powerful person who has ever lived. He controlled almost a billion [1,000,000] people for more than twenty five years. He controlled more than 9 million square kilometres of land. He controlled a country whose present value is more than $980 billion American. He overthrew an army of more than 4 million to get it, and killed many more to keep it. This project details the life of this once godlike ruler.
The legends of Mao Tse-Tung [as that is what they are!] say he was born into a poor peasant family [THE PERCEPTION!], but he was actually born on the 26th of December, 1893, in the home of a fairly well-to-do peasant in Hunan [THE REALITY!]. Mao placed his humble origins in the fact his father was born poor and made his own money.
Even so, Mao did not escape village life until the age of 17 when he went to middle school in Changsha, the capital of Hunan. That year, 1911, the revolution led by Dr Sun Yat-Sen overthrew the imperial government and Mao became caught up in the political instability. He left his studies at the school and after a period in a revolutionary army he began to study at a Hunan Provincial library on his own. He became well acquainted with the works of Darwin, Mill and Rousseau before he ran out of money and joined a teaching course. There he read and loved Chinese literature [as GERARD LEMOS read English literature and History at York University - a latter day dictator with pretensions to grandeur? On returning from a gap year visiting family in India, GERARD LEMOS faced the familiar post-university career trauma. He decided that his job had to reflect his interests, and so he started looking for community work. His first career break came when he found work with ASRA - Asian Sheltered Residential Accommodation (Greater London Housing Association). ASRA, which simply means shelter in Hindi and Urdu, was unusual as it was an Asian housing association. What especially gripped Gerard though was that he was working at the time of the 1980’s race riots on politically and socially important projects in London with funding from his mentor. GERARD LEMOS who lives with his gay partner PAUL CRANE says that “I never wanted to be rich or powerful, but what I did want was to be INFLUENTIAL.” This sort of work, being bang in the middle of things, with his mentor behind him, was what GERARD SAWYER loved].
Mao Tse Tung especially liked reading tales of bandits and heroes, as well as advancing his personal health and fitness which would serve him well in the future.
Instead of becoming a teacher at the completion of his course in 1918 he went to Peking and became a poorly paid assistant in the university library. There he found two allies, the library chief Li Ta-chao, and a professor of literature, Chen Tu-hsui, who were radical MARXISTS and later founded the Chinese COMMUNIST Party, the CCP.
The actual founding of the CCP can be dated to the ‘May 4 Uprising’ in 1919 when thousands of students took to the streets to protest against the concessions given to Japan under the Paris Peace Conference. This created a general feeling of anti-imperialist and anti-Japanese sentiment. Mao has been reported as saying "It was by this time I had become in theory, and, to some extent, in action, a MARXIST."
THE RISE OF THE CCP
NO POLITICAL PARTY PARTY including the LABOUR PARTY can possibly lead a great revolutionary movement to victory unless it possesses REVOLUTIONARY THEORY and a KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORY [this is what GERARD LEMOS studied in part] and has a profound grasp of the PRACTICAL MOVEMENT [This is where the necessary research comes in - is this sufficiently reflected in this contribution?].
"The Role of the Chinese Communist Party in the National War"
10/1938, Selected Works, Vol. II, p 208.
WHAT ABOUT THE UK's ELECTIVE DICTATOR_SHIP [as in the 'Ship of State'] as it does not appear to have any of the hallmarks of a healthy vibrant open independent accountable PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY!
If Registered Social Landlords like the LABOUR PARTY's flagship Registered Social Landlord - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can act in a way in which it has been acting, by ignoring the law and being non transparent, unaccountable and confronting reasonable tenants who submit legitimate complaints in writing - we need to be told WHY?
The EVIDENCE of many reasonable tenants indicates that the landlords NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and specifically its senior management act unethically, unreasonabbly and unlawfully.
Britain's 'SECRET' INDUSTRY - HOUSING - and its Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) have access to unlimited government funding.
After trying to EVICT TENANTS that are NOT in RENT ARREARS [that suddenly supposedly 'materialise'] and yet misrepresenting and deceiving courts that tenants who submit written legitimate complaints in writing are purportedly in RENT ARREARS [NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST then try to apply for Possession of the property - as unnecessary wasted expenditure of money means little or nothing to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - it's just a game - the vulnerable tenants are merely pawns to be used and abused as and when deemed necessary by the senior management].
Matters of LEGALITY do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of CRIMINAL LAW do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of CIVIL LAW do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of HARASSMENT of tenants do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of staff possibly losing their means of EMPLOYMENT do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of a MORAL awareness or a sense of PROPRIETY do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of ACCOUNTABILITY do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of HONESTY do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of GOOD FAITH do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of treating tenants with RESPECT do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of TRUST do NOT seem to figure.
Matters of CHARITY LAW do NOT seem to be upheld.
WHY?
In the meantime, the unaccounability of the flagship Registered Social Landlord - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - demonstrates its unaccountability. Its senior management seem to relish LYING, DECEIVING and FABRICATING EVIDENCE against any tenant who raises legitimate complaints in writing.
WHY?
Why are not serious questions raised concerning the GERRYMANDERING of constituencies through the allocation of Housing to the Local Authorities and to those it houses.
Research the facts, discover the victims and the abuse of trust and the countless good lives that are aimed at being destroyed.
Realise what the LABOUR PARTY are now doing!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
p. white
e-mail:
p.white@hotmail.com
BARHAM PK EST ..V..notting hill take over..
21.03.2006 23:08
I have used posters to high light nhht as a bad landlord,and have had a great responce...
The fight goes on,but I have nhht worried as up in till now its been plain sailing..not any more now I have my site up and running. I use your site address as a link,so tenants here can see your site,good work. codeword for freindly e mail is delta 1 ,put that in subject bar.
john.
JOHN DIGGINS
e-mail:
john.diggins1@ntlworld.com
Homepage:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/john.diggins1
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
22.03.2006 18:39
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a LABOUR PARTY gerrymandering project.
HOUSES = VOTES
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST provides properties for the Local Authorities.
Yet the funding is paid for by TAXPAYERS - without our knowledge!
Tragically, the LABOUR PARTY has been taken over COMPLETELY by the likes of the CHAMPAGNE SOCIALISTS with their CHELSEA TRACTORS!
People like GERARD LEMOS [CHAIRMAN of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - the protege of LORD TOM SAWYER of CATFORD, ex CHAIRMAN of the NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and the ex CHAIRMAN of the LABOUR PARTY] and KATE DAVIES [CHIEF EXECUTIVE of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST] who have both been the biggest disaster for the LABOUR PARTY. They carry on as if they are at one of the champagne bars in the most desirable areas of London. Both have no idea of the REAL world and are a MILLION miles from the REALITY of the grass roots of the LABOUR PARTY.
With people like them - the LABOUR PARTY is DOOMED!
The LABOUR PARTY is sinking fast - like the TITANIC - no spin or PR will save it now.
TONY BLAIR has a limited shelf life
LORD TOM SAWYER of CATFORD has a limited shelf life [He was the first man from the LABOUR PARTY who congratulated TONY BLAIR in 1997. The send person that was congratulated for receiving LABOUR PARTY funds was LORD Michael LEVY (the accountant)]
LORD MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY will continue
GERARD LEMOS has a limited shelf life
KATE DAVIES has shown herself to have a limited shelf life - no amount of coseying up to senior LABOUR PARTY members will help now [is she seeking to tout favours] - as KATE DAVIES is meant to be INDEPENDENT and to give PRIORITY to the BENEFICIARIES (the TENANTS) of the CHARITABLE TRUST - not just to senior LABOUR PARTY members.
Why are they ALL COWARDS?
Why are they ALL BULLIES?
e. nott
e-mail:
e.nott@hotmail.com
NHHT
23.03.2006 23:37
Clive Mander
Nottinghill Housing Trust landlords, unhelpfull re:neighbors from hell issues
24.03.2006 22:16
All I know is the NHHT are the most useless housing corporation with poor customer service and care. They claim to practise a safe code for all people and won't tolerate anti social behavior well, we all know that's full of B/S don't we! Ask any NHHT who's been victimised by their neighbor from hell, and it's usually a he who's terrorizing the female victim.
Laverne
Don't Trust Notting Hill
25.03.2006 05:54
The fact they have a charity number means that Notting Hill Housing, is a Trust and must adhere to Trust law. In the United Kingdom, Trust law has very stringent guidelines, and, as Trustees, Notting Hill Housing Trust's first and ultimate responsibility is to their thousands of tenants who are legally known as beneficiaries. The Trust managment are legally referred to as 'Trustees'. Whilst I am aware that Notting Hill calls their tenants 'Customers' these tenants are in fact Beneficiaries and Notting Hill Housing Trust have a statutory legal duty to their Beneficiaries in every aspect in the provision of quality housing. So, if a beneficiary writes about a complaint, it must be remedied immediately as a priority.
So, if there are people who have in any way been harrassed by Notting Hill Housing Trust or have suffered from anti social neighbours, unlawful flooding, unlawful eviction, severe disrepair, false rent arears and a none responsive complaints service, and have evidence to prove their claim then Notting Hill Housing Trust can be held in Breach of Trust under Trust law. The charity number (16558R) means that Notting Hill is a charity and their assets have been allocated in 'Trust' . Any Beneficiary can bring a Trustee into account through the courts so long as they can support their legitimate claim with evidence. Its really simple, just do it and remember to stand up for your rights because residents of Notting Hill are held by the Trust as BENEFICIARIES. so stand up, demand your rights and start suing them.
Jackie Simons
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
25.03.2006 18:55
The person who set out the dirty blueprint to discredit good tenants is done through the front line staff with strange sounding names employed at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST. Most are incompetent, most are inefficient, most are poorly educated, most speak poor English, but most are very unpleasant and sem to be tasked to confront the most pleasant tenants.
The most intelligent tenants and the not so intelligent tenants know the methods and the signatures used. These are the methods - the very same methods - used by the likes of the most notorious, most wicked, most evil, most cowardly, most bullying, most vile, most dirty landlords that have ever existed in the United Kingdom. PETER RACHMAN who originated in NOTTING HILL and NICHOLAS VAN HOOGENSTRATEN used some of the methods that are now being adopted and developed with government support by ROTTING HELL HOUSING TRUST or is it NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - the flagship REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD (RSL) in London and in this country?
How dare GERARD LEMOS and KATE DAVIES attack good pleasant honourable tenants by the underhand methods set out in the books of what is clearly SOCIAL ENGINEERING in the books of GERARD LEMOS and adopted with glee by LORD TOM SAWYER and TONY BLAIR in order to garner the VOTE to win a GENERAL ELECTION for the LABOUR PARTY.
GERARD LEMOS and KATE DAVIES have both only ever known a HIGHLY PRIVILEGED background of expense account living that other poorer people have to pay out of the meagre pennies the vulnerable tenants are obliged to gather together.
POVERTY in this country is linked inextricably to HOUSING and its availability.
The availability of HOUSING in LONDON and the country is organised by the GOVERNMENT.
Therefore POVERTY is orchestrated through the connection to GOVERNMENT.
FLAGSHIP REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD = LABOUR = DICTATORIAL ATTITUDE
VOTE LABOUR = placing good tenants in purported RENT ARREARS?
VOTE LABOUR = placing good tenants in properties with major DISREPAIR?
VOTE LABOUR = placing good tenants in properties with NEIGHBOURS FROM HELL?
VOTE LABOUR = placing good tenants in properties with the management being confrontational, negative and hostile?
VOTE LABOUR = placing good tenants in properties where the management do not communicate or consult adequately or at all?
VOTE LABOUR = placing good tenants in properties where the management ensure the VICTIMS appear as the PERPETRATORS and the PERPETRATORS appear as the VICTIMS?
VOTE LABOUR = placing of good tenants in properties where the senior management appear to act in BREACH OF TRUST?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a CHARITY
A CHARITY means that the DIRECTORS must be very careful how they act otherwise they can be IMMEDIATELY taken to the HIGH COURT and held PERSONALLY LIABLE in BREACH OF TRUST!!!
As Jackie reminds us:
The DIRECTORS of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are TRUSTEES.
The TENANTS are BENEFICIARIES of the CHARITABLE TRUST.
TRUSTEES have a LEGAL DUTY to act in the BEST INTERESTS of the BENEFICIARIES
If NOT - the MANAGEMENT commit a BREACH OF TRUST - a very serious breach of law.
Be aware of the actions of the TRUSTEES/DIRECTORS of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
Are you a VICTIM?
Watch out - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST staff will soon want to identify you as the PERPETRATOR?
LORD TOM SAWYER and his pals want to ensure that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST will be able to have the power to issue Anti-Social Behaviour Order's (ASBOs) through delegated powers from the Local Authorities. Be aware as to what is going on.
Be aware that a vote for LABOUR on 4 MAY 2006 = a way to be targetted as the VICTIM!
[But the real VICTIM = the perceived PERPETRATOR.]
The political DICTATORSHIP is rapidly approaching [or has it already arrived?].
errol
e-mail:
e.white@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
25.03.2006 19:04
How can there be so very many MEMBERS of the LABOUR PARTY?
It is important to REALISE the CONNECTIONS!
It then becomes CRYSTAL CLEAR how it ALL works!
john smith
e-mail:
john_smith_mail@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
25.03.2006 19:16
Be amazed at the amount of MEMBERS of the LABOUR PARTY.
Now it becomes understandable to identify the connection!
john smith
e-mail:
john_smith_mail@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
25.03.2006 20:40
The management are overpaid. Why? To use agressive tactics against the good tenants.
The management use social engineering. Why? To get votes for the LABOUR PARTY.
Who said that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST had a shortage of money?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have RESERVES that increase YEAR on YEAR.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a CHARITY (with 21 CHARITY shops):
Therefore, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is EXEMPT from TAX.
What is more, is it not that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST with ease transfers its vast housing stock of over 18,000 properties from the commercial entity: NOTTING HILL HOME OWNERSHIP Co. Ltd. to the CHARITY - NOTTING HIL HOUSING TRUST and vice versa without concern about investigative audits as NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is linked to the heart of the LABOUR Project!
Now, is it not the case that a very old man who is still a LABOUR MP a friend of LORD TOM SAWYER called NIC RAYNSFORD and very interested in property and the vote linked to that property. He is still alive and kicking. He was a LABOUR COUNCILLOR of Hammersmith and has now been placed on the BOARD of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to try to continue the SOCIAL ENGINEERING project for VOTES?
Is it not the case that he has a very nasty streak or is it that he has been far too long as a LABOUR politician? Many good people have informed me that he is NOT to be trusted.
I have been reminded by too many in the LABOUR PARTY that he could be an ELECTORAL LIABILITY before this coming ELECTION.
Never trust a politician. Particularly one who ATTACKS without thinking!
The Board of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are likely to have an adverse impact on this coming election.... because they are using the WRONG tactics!
They do not treat with respect the most intelligent of their tenants...
The answer is so simple...
ROB
e-mail:
ROBSCOTT@yahoo.co.uk
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
27.03.2006 23:51
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST 1
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST 2
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST 3
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST 4
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST 5
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST 6
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST 7
Notting Hill Housing Trust is linked to the very core of the Labour Party - the more comments on this site are removed, the more this points to the fact that to some the truth is very painful.
Why should the truth be so very painful for some?
Notting Hill Housing Trust is a Charity, so why do the senior management of Notting Hill Housing Trust call all the tenants 'Customers' when all the tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust are Beneficiaries of the Trust. Beneficiaries can enforce their legal duties of the Trust - whereas Customers are unknown to a legal Trust and cannot enforce their legal duties of a Trust! Understand our rights means an understanding of the legal duties of the Trusrees to the Beneficiaries - all the tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust.
Is this a way to hide the truth from all the tenants so they do not seek their legal remedies.
The management are Trustees.
The tenants are Beneficiaries of the Trust.
Trustess have a legal duty to act in the best interests of the Beneficiaries.
If the Trustees act in wilful default of their legal duties, they commit a serious Breach of Trust.
For a Breach of Trust the Trustees can be imprisoned!
It appears that the Senior Management of Notting Hill Housing Trust do not seem to take their legal duties seriously if they appreciate their legal duties to the Beneficiaries of the Trust - all the tenants?
Yet an ignorance of the law does not free any of the Trustees from blame!
Is it not the case that the tenant representive entity of Notting Hill Housing Trust is a toothless corpse - which is seen as a great big joke by most tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust?
Is it not the case that the two tenant representatives represent the interests of Notting Hill Housing Trust?
That is what most of the tenants believe and do not trust them - moles in the camp - is this not what most tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust believe?
ROB
e-mail:
ROBSCOTT@yahoo.co.uk
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - ABUSE BY MANAGEMENT
31.03.2006 11:07
Why are the number of complaints against the management of the trust increasing? The figures given to parliament were not independent - a friend in the charity informed me that the number of complaints are increasing - yet parliament were told they are decreasing. An independent audit by the National Audit Office (NAO) is needed as a matter of utmost urgency!
Why were there recently several redundancies at notting hill housing trust headquarters at Hammersmith? The good communicative staff were sacked but the really confrontational unpleasant and hostile staff who sought conflict and severe problems with tenant who complained in writin were all retained? Is this not the house style? No amount of spin, deception, public relations or management consultants on the Board can redress the many well founded grievances by most of the tenants who are now complaining.
Why are so many tenants deliberately being placed in purported 'rent arrears' when there are no rent arrears as the rent is paid in full by housing benefit? Just used as a ploy to evict. Why is there compelling evidence that many tenants have been transferred from a valuable notting hill housing (commercial) property to a less valuable notting hill housing (charity) trust property (whilst the highly valued property is sold at a considerable mark up) - yet the tenant is dumped into a significantly less valuable property with despicable disrepair?
Most of the notting hill housing trust properties are rife with disrepair, why?
Instead of fulfilling the obligatory repairing obligations, money is spent in more admin costs.
Why do all the senior staff - as a matter of course - tend to treat the tenants (especially a tenant who has written a legitimate complaint in writing) as if the tenants are there to be abused?
There is compelling evidence that notting hill housing trust tenant 'audits' are used as an 'intelligence gathering' exercise - once any confidential information is obtained, it appears to be used not for the benfit of the tenant but against the tenant and in support of any adverse landlord policy. Too long being a tenant of notting hill housing trust has made many of the most respectable tenants very informed and extremely aware of the adverse tactics deployed.
Why no proper communication and consultation? Why do certain local authority councillors not act with political independence and impartiality, rather than with partiality?
I think it is time for the truth to be told!
lou
e-mail:
l.clark5432@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - ABUSE BY MANAGEMENT
31.03.2006 18:58
sam
e-mail:
srich@virgin.co.uk
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - ABUSE BY MANAGEMENT
01.04.2006 23:43
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST CHAIRMAN IS GERARD LEMOS
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST CHIEF EXECUTIVE IS KATE DAVIES
WHY DO THEY BOTH NOT ANSWER LETTERS FROM TENANTS WITH LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS?
IT SEEMS LIKE THEY BOTH HAVE FAR TOO MUCH TO HIDE
IF THEIR COMMUNICATION SKILLS ARE BOTH DIRE - THEY SHOULD BOTH RESIGN
WHY WERE THEY APPOINTED?
I KNOW BOTH OF THEM ARE LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS
GERARD LEMOS WAS THE PUPPET OF LORD TOM SAWYER - CHAIRMAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY - HE INTRODUCED THE DISCRIMINATING POLICIES TO GIVE PRIORITY TO NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS AND TO TREAT BRITISH CITIZENS WITH DERISION
GERARD LEMOS CAN KEEP HIS POLICIES OF DISCRIMINATION IN INDIA OR ELSEWHERE OR WITH HIS GAY LOVER BUT NOT IN COSMOPOLITAN LONDON
WHY ARE CITIZENS OF ALL BACKGROUNDS TARGETED UNDER THE POLICIES OF GERARD LEMOS?
HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION BY PROXY.
GERARD LEMOS SHOULD FALL ON HIS SWORD
KATE DAVIES SHOULD FALL ON HER SWORD
NEW PEOPLE SHOULD BE APPOINTED TO THE BOARD OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST THAT SHAKE IT UP TO ITS VERY FOUNDATIONS OR IT SHOULD BE DISSOLVED!
NO MORE SACKINGS OF GOOD STAFF!
SACK HOSTILE CONFRONTATIONAL AGGRESSIVE STAFF
NOT ALL LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS ON THE BOARD OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - CRONIES OF LORD TOM SAWYER - CRONIES OF GERARD LEMOS
CRONIES OF THE LABOUR PARTY
CRONIES OF LABOUR PEERS
CRONIES OF LABOUR MP's
A GOOD SHAKE OUT AND INVESTIGATION OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS CALLED FOR AS A MATTER OF UTMOST URGENCY
REGISTER A CLEAR VOTE ON THURSDAY 4 MAY 2006
LOCAL ELECTIONS - LOCAL FEEDBACK
COMMUNITY CENSURE - COMMUNITY SAY
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION
COMMUNITY CALLS FOR CLEARER COMMUNICATION
I
del
e-mail:
DMartin@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST = ABUSE BY MANAGEMENT
02.04.2006 12:47
I live in a democracy not in a dictatorship - no matter what Mr Lemos the Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust or Ms Davies the Chief Executive of Notting HiIl Housing Trust instruct the uncommunicative and hostile management at Notting Hill Housing Trust in Hammersmith Grove, Hammersmith - the 40 year old charity with its 21 charity shops or the commercial company with its portfolio of properties that might be in the commercial entity or placed in the charity, it depends on what serves the best interests of the tax avoiding money laundering sham entity that receives unlimited public taxpayers money that tax payers know nothing about.
Notting Hill Housing Trust is not accountable as other tenants have stressed. The once reputable charitable trust has recently been completely corrpted by the senior members of the Labour government
Notting HIll Housing Trust needs to be investigated as a matter of urgency by parliament not by the Labour government that has given it enormous powers and enormous amountsd of public money in order to provide local authorities with their housing needs, thereby making it not possible to investigate the major disrepair, the many breaches of planning law by management of Notting HIll Housing Trust, the non fulfilling of their legal obligations and the impossibility of enforcing environmental health officers to fulfill their duties and the impossibility of planning control departments of the local authority not enforcing their obligations.
What is more, the legal and advice centres in the London boroughs receive money from the local authority so this ensures that there is no proper calling to account of a major landlord that uses unlawful tactics against its many tenants that are now going through absolute hell - the senior management cannot get away with this abuse as they have in the past - they must be and will be held to account
Voting at the local elections are the right opportunity to send the right signal to central government that central government are not listening and are acting in a way which is heedless of the concerns of the electorate who have had enough!!!
Tactics of abuse from the senior management of Notting Hill Housing Trust - being implemented from the twisted thoughts of Lord Tom Sawyer and Gerard Lemos - both senior members of the Labour Party - the government in power - they are causing the destruction of so many lives of good people who are now beginning to raise their voices until these matters are sorted out - once and for all
Solution - do not vote Labour
The Labour Party is screwing the country - no matter who you are
Gerard Lemos discriminates against all tenants who write legitimate complaints. He does not answer any of the many letters addressed to him. He then targets those tenants by proxy
Using race as Mr Lemos is doing is a sham - it is a scandal but it is the same tactic used by every Communist government. Is that why Mr Lemos studied history and describes himself as a social researcher - to socially engineer what were communities and are now
divided communities
I agree with all the other complaining tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust
earl
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - DESTRUCTION OF BRITISH DEMOCRACY
02.04.2006 16:19
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
IS BRITISH DEMOCRACY NOW BEING COMPROMISED AND UNDERMINED BY EUROPEAN UNION SOVEREIGNTY FROM THE ACTIONS OF TONY BLAIR AND HIS 'RIGHT HAND MAN' PETER MANDELSON?
SUPPORT OF THE US APPEARS TO BE UNDERMINED?
GERRYMANDERING of PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES!?!
GERRYMANDERING means to change the political representation of a constituency through the changing of housing allocation in a particular constituency - this has been done and is now being done with significant consequences where the LABOUR PARTY controls the provision of housing and the LABOUR PARTY can thereby significantly influence the outcome of the vote in marginal constituencies through the allocation of houses and flats through their allocation by Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) like ‘the flagship’ RSL – NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP. All other RSLs adopt the same policies and thereby allocate the ‘right’ tenants (in accordance with the policies of GERARD LEMOS, as the protégé of his mentor, LORD TOM SAWYER)! RSLs now provide ‘the appropriate flats and/or houses’ to ‘the appropriate people’ on waiting lists of all Local Authorities.
Consider the connections:
GERARD LEMOS, (26/2/58) [7 Bisham Gardens, N6 6DJ] Chairman NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP (‘NHHG’) – the flagship Registered Social Landlord (‘RSL’) [allocation of public sector housing and properties to local authorities] since September 2004
Publications:
i) ‘Interviewing Perpetrators of Racial Harassment’, 1994
ii) ‘Fair Recruitment and Selection’, 1995
iii) ‘Safe as Houses: Supporting People Experiencing Racial Harassment’, 1996 (jointly)
iv) ‘The Communities We Have Lost and Can Regain’, 1997
v) ‘Urban Village, Global City: The Regeneration of Colville’, 1998 [Colville Ward is located east of Portobello Road at Notting Hill in Kensington and Chelsea]
vi) ‘A Future Foretold: New Approaches to Meeting the Long Term Needs of Single Homeless People’, 1999
vii) ‘Racial Harassment: Action on the Ground’, (2000) (jointly)
viii) ‘Dreams Deferred: The Families and Friends of Homeless and Vulnerable People’, 2002
First Floor Office of (GERARD) LEMOS & (PAUL) CRANE (his partner): 64 Highgate High Street, N6 5HX (020-8348-8263) [The home of GERARD LEMOS & PAUL CRANE is at 7 Bisham Gardens which is very close to their office: 64 Highgate High Street, next to Pond Square at the top of Highgate Hill.]
GERARD LEMOS was and is the protégé of LORD (Lawrence) TOM SAWYER (12/5/43) [22 Inchmery Road, SE6 2NE]
TOM SAWYER is the ex Chairman, NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP (until September 2004), ex Chairman, LABOUR PARTY (close friend of the Prime Minister, TONY BLAIR) (LORD SAWYER was appointed a LABOUR PARTY peer by TONY BLAIR in 1998) (immediately therafter in 1998 LORDS SAWYER was appointed Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP to be responsible for the flagship Registered Social Landlord NHHG adopting political policies agreed by LORD SAWYER and GERARD LEMOS paid for out of the substantial reserves of the charity that boasts its 21 charity shops in the most exclusive addresses of London and is able to charge commercial rents through its allied entities - owning over 18,000 properties - incorporating property that covers large swathes of central London - yet many of the tenants have been raising legitimate complaints of Rachmanism, such as harassment and victimisation by management of the commercial entity and particularly from the charitable entity that seems to revel in doing little about disrepair of its properties and placing its tenants that complain in writing in deliberate rent arrears if any reasonable tenant dare to complain in writing raising legitimate complaints), previously Deputy General Secretary of NATIONAL UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ('NUPE')/UNISON Union (1981-94), in charge of representing most central government and local government employees.
LABOUR PARTY National Executive Committee (‘NEC’) Member, 1981-94, 1998-2001;
Chairman LABOUR PARTY 1991-92;
General Secretary, LABOUR PARTY 1994-98;
Chair, LABOUR PARTY Home Policy Committee 1994-98 (020-7219-8668)]
GERARD LEMOS, Deputy Chairman, BRITISH COUNCIL – strong links to the very centre of LABOUR PARTY policy
GERARD LEMOS, was Lead Investigator of the AUDIT COMMISSION.
GERARD LEMOS, AUDIT COMMISSION, Board Member or Commissioner.
AUDIT COMMISSION regulates RSLs – NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP is an RSL - CONFLICT OF INTEREST!
GERARD LEMOS, CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONER - oversees AUDIT COMMISSION.
But all employees of AUDIT COMMISSION are subjected to authority of Civil Service!
AUDIT COMMISSION inspectors must feel compromised in their inspections as GERARD LEMOS is head of the flagship RSL but also oversees Civil Service but all inspectors of the AUDIT COMMISSION are civil servants - CONFLICT OF INTEREST!
Is it right that there is this clear politicisation of RSLs through the work of the head of the flagship RSL which is being implemented as LABOUR PARTY policy?
Is it right that there is Gerrymandering of political constituencies through the political actions of the RSLs?
GERARD LEMOS is the main LABOUR PARTY Government Race Adviser!
The Chief Prosecutor or Director of Public Prosecutions [DPP] as head of the Crown Prosecution Service [50 Ludgate Hill, London EC4M 7EX] is Kenneth (Donald John) Macdonald (4/1/53), [22 Dartmouth Park Road, NW5 1SX] who set up Matrix Chambers, where Cherie Blair works.
Matrix Chambers is located at Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn, WC1R 5LN, (020-7404-3447) near Chancery Lane. She recommended her husband appoint Kenneth Macdonald as DPP. [Though his specialisation was in defence work not prosecution work!]
Whereas the Solicitor-General appointed by Tony Blair in 2001 is Harriet Harman (30/7/50) [1 Winterbrook Road, SE24 9HZ], the MP for Peckham who previously worked for Brent Community Law Centre is married to JACK DROMEY (21/9/48) who was National Secretary of the Transport and General Workers UNION (TGWU).
Iain Coleman (18/1/58), the ex MP for Hammersmith & Fulham who in 2005 lost his seat to Greg Hands MP (Conservative) is the husband of Councillor Dame SALLY POWELL (2/10/55) [30 Coverdale Road, W12 8JL – 020-8749-1043)] of Hammersmith & Fulham [previously worked at Glazer Delmar Solicitors, 223-229 Rye Lane, SE15 until 1997 when Tony Blair was appointed as Prime Minister and both SALLY POWELL and TONY BLAIR sit on the NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (‘NEC’) of the LABOUR PARTY, the body that controls the LABOUR PARTY and all its policies in order to take power and to hold power. The PARTY, not the People first!
There are other significant partnerships at the highest echelons of the Labour Party, but the people at the core of ‘The Project’ often tend to use another surname to the name of their partner – to muddy the waters for media interest. [As Cherie Blair (23/9/54) calls her name Cherie Booth not Cherie Blair.]
Charles Falconer (19/11/51) [34 Alwyne Road, N1 2HW] the Lord Chancellor is the ex flat mate of Tony Blair (6/5/53) both undertook a law degree followed by the Bar. Charles Falconer was appointed to the post by Tony Blair. This means that as Lord Chancellor he is responsible for all courts, the judicial process and the staffing of all courts and appointing, promoting and dismissing any and all judges in the UK! Previously he was responsible for Housing at the all important Ministry of Housing, Planning and Regeneration at the DTLR!
In the UK, Justice, Law and its administration needs to be understood in terms of Politics – all linked inextricably to the Prime Minster! It is the Prime Minister who determines the timetable of legislation that goes through Parliament. It is effectively the Prime Minister and through the Prime Minister and directly or indirectly his appointees that determine the granting of honours, appointments and government largesse/support or government withdrawal/censure.
[This Prime Ministerial support or censure applies equally to individual support or individual censure through the powerful organs of the State and this tends the case as seen through the media which tends to reflect that dynamic!]
[Leading lights of the Labour Party:
i) Peter Benjamin MANDELSON, known as PETER MANDELSON (21/10/53)(ex Trade Secretary for the UK and now European Union Commissioner for Trade – appointed by Tony Blair) (80 Archel Road, W14 9QP) [ex Director of English National Ballet] [knows Chrisanthe Lemos (4/7/48) of 65 Eaton Square, SW1 9BQ, ex Director of English National Ballet - both resigned in 1997],
ii) (John Whitaker) Jack STRAW, known as JACK STRAW(3/8/46) – Foreign Secretary [Jack Straw was leader of the Peasants Revolt in 1381 – a revolt against the Poll Tax], and
iii) Peter Gerald HAIN, known as PETER HAIN (16/2/50)(Born in Nairobi, Kenya) Northern Ireland Secretary + Welsh Secretary, [found guilty in the UK of CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY in 1972 + leading role in anti-apartheid activities + supporter of Irish unity]
were ALL leading members of the British COMMUNIST PARTY and were targeted by the UK Security Service – now with the support of the current Prime Minister there is no censure but support!]
Jason Lewis, ‘We’ve stopped looking for reds under the bed says MI5’, February 26, 2006, The Mail on Sunday, page 51.
"After years of spying on MARXIST and TROTSKYITE Trade unionists, MI5 [Security Service headquartered at Thames House, by Lambeth Bridge (north west side)] has officially declared they are no longer a danger to national security. As it faces up to the threat of international terrorism in the wake of the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks, it has dropped all so-called ‘reds under the bed’ operations.
The ‘enemy within’ surveillance monitored the activities of hundreds of RADICALS feared to be plotting the overthrow of the Government. It kept a close watch on alleged COMMUNIST SYMPATHISERS – including several who went on to become LABOUR CABINET MINISTERS.
SECRET FILES on:
JACK STRAW – currently responsible for the activities of MI5’s sister service MI6, the foreign intelligence service [Secret Intelligence Service (‘SIS’) headquartered at Vauxhall Cross, by Vauxhall Bridge (south east side)] – apparently classified him as a SUBVERSIVE when he was a student leader in the Sixties.
PETER MANDELSON, former NORTHERN IRELAND Secretary, TONY BLAIR’s right hand man and now EUROPEAN UNION TRADE COMMISSIONER, was bugged for three years in the late Seventies because it was feared he could have been a SOVIET AGENT as a former member of the YOUNG COMMUNIST LEAGUE.
And current NORTHERN IRELAND Secretary [and WELSH Secretary] PETER HAIN is also believed to have been SPIED on because of his leading role in anti-apartheid protests in the Seventies.
But according to MI5 no current student communists, nuclear disarmament campaigners or Left-wing trade unionists are being watched.
MI5 does not comment publicly on its work but a statement on its website says: ‘During much of the 20th Century, SUBVERSION was a major issue of concern for the Security Service. This threat diminished sharply following the end of the Cold War and for the last five years has been assessed as negligible.’
It now says: ‘The Service no longer undertakes counter-subversion work, and would only take it up again if our monitoring of emerging threats suggested an increase in the subversive threat.’
MI5 and successive Governments faced criticism over the spying operations which allegedly targeted leading members of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and trade unionists including Arthur Scargill, who led the miners’ strike in 1984.
But according to MI5, ‘Britain faced a real threat from subversive organisations seeking to undermine parliamentary democracy – and having the capability to do so – most notably during the Cold War.’
COMMUNISTS, TROTSKYITES and FASCISTS linked to ‘countries hostile to the UK’ were put under surveillance and their telephones bugged.
‘A particular focus of this work was to deny members of such groups access to sensitive government information,’ MI5 says. Now more than half of MI5’s officers are focused on combating the threat of Al Qaeda and international terrorism."
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
ROB
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - ODPM - LABOUR EXECUTIVE
04.04.2006 13:02
DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER - JOHN PRESCOTT – UNDER FIRE AS CHEAT WHO STOLE FROM HIS DEPARTMENT IS JAILED
ODPM - OFFICE of DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER [JOHN PRESCOTT – ex ship’s steward on the cross channel ferries plying between England and France – the man who was ‘NOT WANTED ON VOYAGE’ (the title of the book he was involved in writing) he DIVIDED the ship’s crew and went on to CONTROL the shore-side NATIONAL UNION OF SEAMEN – now thanks to his very DIVISIVE TACTICS and his DEEP INVOLVEMENT in UNDERMINING British Shipping, his WRECKING TACTICS have all but destroyed British Shipping Companies and seen BRITISH COMPANIES now not employ British people; ‘flagging’ [changing the sovereignty or governing law of ships] what were British ships under so-called ‘flags-of-convenience’ with poor quality ships, poor safety record, poorly qualified crews, more shipping disasters - PRESCOTT and his destroying UNION tactics have assisted in the destruction of BRITAIN, British Shipping and the British ECONOMY - his wrecking antics have resulted in his old British Shipping Company – Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Company Limited (P&O) with its very proud history and its ownership of many ports around Britain and in the United States – which should raise NATIONAL SECURITY issues - being bought out by the United Arab Emirates – yet, not a whisper in BRITAIN!]
JOHN PRESCOTT’s COMPETENCE WAS CALLED INTO QUESTION LAST NIGHT after a conman was jailed for stealing nearly £1 million of taxpayers’ money from the DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER’s Department. [OFFICE OF DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER (ODPM)]
Robert Adewunmi, an unqualified accountant, hid his criminal past and lied about his qualifications to gain work in the heart of government.
He used the money, which should have been spent on housing, to fund a luxury lifestyle by siphoning off chunks of up to £133,000 a time for a year before being discovered.
The 32-year-old gambling addict fooled officials into wiring funds to a front company which he created while working as a trouble shooter in the budget and Data Management Division in Central London.
HIS THEFT IS THE LATEST SCANDAL TO HIT THE OFFICE OF DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER (ODPM), WHERE INCOMPETENCE, BULLYING AND FINANCIAL IRREGULARITIES HAVE BEEN [ONCE AGAIN] EXPOSED.
Adewunmi was jailed for four years after admitting fraudulent trading and money laundering at Southwark Crown Court in London. Just over half of the £867,200 he stole in 2003-4 is likely to be recovered.
Adewunmi, whose wife Tami was also jailed for six months, used the plundered cash to build up a property portfolio with homes on both sides of the Atlantic, furnished with £3,000 of family portraits.
Their home in Slough, Berkshire, was lavishly furnished with a £10,000 bed, a £15,000 conservatory, 20 wardrobes stuffed with designer clothes and his-and-hers luxury cars in the drive.
Adewunmi had 20 expensive watches and also blew £1,000 on manicuring.
Passing sentence, Judge Christopher Hardy told Adewunmi: ‘Of course it was not the Deputy Prime Minister’s money you stole but money entrusted to him by the public, the taxpayers, and it was certainly not meant to satisfy your greed and lavish lifestyle.’
Adewunmi’s lawyer, Tristan Harwood, said: This will be embarrassing for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.’
Tory [Conservative] spokesman Caroline Spelman said:
‘This conviction of fraud in the ODPM is extremely serious. This raises yet more questions about JOHN PRESCOTT’s leadership and his beleagured Whitehall empire.
‘THE ODPM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AREAS SUCH AS HOUSING WHICH HAVE A HUGE IMPACT ON PEOPLE’S LIVES, AND THEY NEED TO KNOW THE MAN IN CHARGE IS UP TO THE JOB.’
IN JANUARY [2006], AN INDEPENDENT REPORT REVEALED THAT JUST ONE IN EIGHT [1:8] REGENERATION EXPERTS THINK MR PRESCOTT’S LEADERSHIP IS ‘EFFECTIVE’ OR ‘BROADLY OK’.
AND A LEAKED SURVEY OF STAFF IN THE ODPM DESCRIBED MR PRESCOTT’S DEPARTMENT AS UNFOCUSED, LACKING LEADERSHIP AND COMPARABLE TO A PANTOMIME HORSE’.
Last night a spokesman for the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) said: ‘Robert Adewunmi provided misleading information on his CV [the qualifications and career experience he could offer his employer] which was not identified by the employment agency nor ODPM.
‘ODPM procedures in respect of temporary staff were changed before this fraud was discovered but not before it had taken place.
‘They have been subject to further review and strengthening since.’
Tim Shipman (Political Correspondent) – Prescott’s £1 Million Conman
Daily Mail, Saturday, 11 March 2006, page 11 [
The newspaper article highlights the fact that the procedures of the ODPM encourage the recruitment of incompetent, inefficient and questionable staff under the policies of early retirement for Caucasian staff and accelerated recruitment and promotion for non Caucasian staff – has been rapidly fast-tracked - in an effort to engineer Blair’s Britain. [Divide and Rule the British electorate.]
The spokesman for ODPM has used the very old, the tried and trusted excuse that ‘procedures have been improved’ – yet the same incompetent employees can be seen increasingly recruited across the ODPM and most central Government Departments.
All accelerating the destruction of the British culture and the British way of life!
This article demonstrates the promotion of people from overseas whose qualifications are not checked and using agencies where the ODPM can try to avoid or limit its liability and its responsibility.
The ODPM is responsible for overseeing Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) and responsible for paying out billions of pounds of taxpayers money to Registered Social Landlords.
The accountability and transparency of ODPM cry out for immediate overhaul.
Many British people are now demanding immediate changes at ODPM.
There can be no changes at the head of ODPM – as TONY BLAIR relies too much on the support of the Unions in Britain for no strikes.
JOHN PRESCOTT is seen as the epitome of the dinosaur UNION leader that assisted in the accelerated destruction of the BRITISH economy.
LOCAL ELECTIONS in BRITAIN take place on THURSDAY, 4 MAY 2006.
Do you want to see:
i) TONY BLAIR VISION: STALINIST, TROTSKYITE, BRITISH ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP!
OR
ii) BRITSH DEMOCRACY WITH ACCOUNTABLE PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT?
jenn
e-mail:
j.parker@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - CONFRONTATIONAL TACTICS
04.04.2006 13:31
FIRST - LOOK AT THE FACTS PROPERLY!
BRITISH COUNCIL CRONIES - GERARD LEMOS
BRITISH COUNCIL CRONIES - GERARD LEMOS
BRITISH COUNCIL CRONIES - GERARD LEMOS
DECENT HOMES - COMPARE WITH NHHT HOMES!
RACHMAN 40 YEARS AGO - NHHT NOW - MUCH WORSE!
TRANSFERS
ASBOs - THE NHHT TOOL OF CHOICE - BUT TO THE RIGHT PERSON?
MASSIVE COST FOR MANAGEMENT - WHY SO HIGH?
THE SMILING FACE - OF CONFRONTATIONAL THOUGHT?
LORD TOM SAWYER - BUT DO NOT BELIEVE THE RHETORIC
LORD TOM SAWYER - BUT DO NOT BELIEVE THE RHETORIC
NHHT CANNOT BE TRUSTED
NHHT CANNOT BE TRUSTED
CHIEF EXECUTIVE TAKES THE BLAME
CHIEF EXECUTIVE TAKES THE BLAME
GERARD LEMOS - GOVERNMENT RACE ADVISER (1)
GERARD LEMOS - GOVERNMENT RACE ADVISER (2)
NHHT LINKS CLOSELY TO LOCAL AUTHORITY
NHHT LINKS CLOSELY TO LOCAL AUTHORITY
THE HOUSE MANAGEMENT STYLE:
CONFLICT AND CONFRONTATION
YET IT COULD BE:
COMMUNICATION and CONCILIATION
WHY THE HOSTILITY - WHY THE NEGATIVITY - WHY THE DECEIT?
den
e-mail:
demden@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - tenant
04.04.2006 14:00
DO NOT TRUST - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
DO NOT TRUST - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
POOR PETER! LORD TOM SAWYER GETS PETER TO TAKE THE BLAME
POOR PETER! LORD TOM SAWYER GETS PETER TO TAKE THE BLAME
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - tenant
e-mail:
tony99@virgin.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - THE MANAGEMENT
04.04.2006 15:44
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST TRUSTEES (1)
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST TRUSTEES (2)
john smith
e-mail:
john_smith_mail@hotmail.com
Silenced by the Housing Corporation
05.04.2006 01:17
In this case, when important news needs to be published about the affairs of a registered social landlord for the benefit of the public interest, the Housing Corporation stepped in and silenced a social housing sector publication known as 'Inside Housing'. Below is an article about this;
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gagged by the Housing Corporation
The 'Inside Housing' publication was gagged this week after the Housing Corporation won a temporary injunction preventing the publication of a story with wide implications for the sector.
In an unprecedented move, the corporation went to the High Court late on Wednesday to prevent Inside Housing revealing details contained in its internal board documents that relate to the affairs of two housing associations.
It argued that allowing Inside Housing to publish a story would breach its confidentiality, despite originally supplying a statement. The facts of the story have not been disputed. Inside Housing argued that the story was clearly in the public interest, as it involves decisions on public funds and has implications for the housing sector.
The judge granted a temporary injunction of seven days on the grounds that additional time was needed to hear more detailed arguments.
The Housing Corporation sought the injunction four hours before Inside Housing went to press. The judge ruled that Inside Housing could not publish the contents of board minutes of the Housing Corporation or associated documents in the interim. A further hearing has been scheduled for 5 April. Inside Housing will be seeking to overturn the injunction.
The corporation has engaged Clifford Chance, billed as the world's largest law firm, to act on its behalf.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - ABUSE BY MANAGEMENT
05.04.2006 17:10
Is it dem NOTTING HILL HOUSING?
My slum landlord NOTTING HILL HOUSING dem right wicked at abusing dem tenant.
Is it dem NOTTING HILL HOUSING?
They deceive man
They sleazy man
I see dat Kate Davies we sort her man
dat Gerard Lemos he's batty man with his stick up his Paul man - we sort him man
He need visit from dem brothers man
delroy
delroy
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - ABUSE OF TENANTS
05.04.2006 19:20
LABOUR PARTY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CONTROLLED
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
LABOUR PARTY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CONTROLLED
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
len
Notting Hill Housing Trust
05.04.2006 22:56
Sebastian
notting hill housing trust complaint
06.04.2006 00:51
Mary Ratcliffe
e-mail:
ratcliffem@earthlink.net
Demands to NHHG
06.04.2006 17:23
Charles Lowden
Innocent until proven guilty??? Not at NOTTINGHILL HOUSING TRUST
09.04.2006 01:59
I had heart attack since becoming an enemy of Notting Hill Housing trust, and have suffered from very poor health since. The Notting Hill Housing trust have been advised by my GP, my medical CONSULTANT and a HEALTH WORKER all whom raised with Notting Hill Housing that this man needs ground floor accommodation. A ground floor flat had become vacant in my block. This flat was given to a retiring caretaker from the (council); Then Notting Hill Housing trust had changed their way of emergency housing, twice in the last 8 years.
Rent owing (paid direct /housing benefit)
The Notting Hill Housing Trust purported that there has been aggression on my part. There is widespread drug dealing from my Anti social neighbours (R.Bristow) Some staff from the trust came to my home told me that a complaint had in fact been made against me ranging from numerous different allegations. The person who made this complaint hides behind the data protection act when in fact they do not really understand the DATA PROTECTION Act.
I went 2 Fulham police station regarding her claim, the police informed me of her response was I DIN'T MAKE IT AN OFFICIAL complaint, but she did by bringing it 2 my attention, this is the same person that took a bottle of champagne from me at my home, is this a responsible person whom should be dealing with people in any way shape or form? I have the conservative MP for Fulham looking into this.
I could go on for ever but, if the Notting Hill Housing Trust get their way I will end up on the street. That is how bad it is now. Yours Faithfully
B.Lindsey
07944 920193
Barry Lindsey
e-mail:
b.lindsey@ukonline.co.uk
Homepage:
http://07944 920193
Notting Hill Housing Trust
09.04.2006 02:29
Harassment is a CRIMINAL matter.
Discrimination is a CRIMINAL matter.
There is a law - PREVENTION FROM HARRASSMENT ACT 1997.
Yet too many tenants say on Oath that such policies of Harrassment and Discrimination are being purposely directed by the senior management of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST directed against them on an all too regular basis.
Responsibility in law for these very serious allegations must lie at the door of the Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - MR GERARD LEMOS.
Purposeful maladministration of an organization is disturbing, but when directed against vulnerable tenants surely means that this policy takes on a new and terrifying meaning.
The HOUSING CORPORATION reports it cannot do anything about abuse by Rachman style landlords that adopt the same tactics. The HOUSING CORPORATION is a self-regulating authority to protect Registered Social Landlords set up by government - not for tenants from which to benefit.
The HOUSING OMBUDSMAN reports that the tenants are correct. Yet the HOUSING OMBUDSMAN scheme was set up by the government so that any agreement of mismanagement would be kept confidential between landlords and tenants and not made public like the open and public determination of a COUNTY COURT or the HIGH COURT, so that the landlords would not be embarrassed by adverse determinations - as have been made against NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
The AUDIT COMMISSION that has a legal duty to investigate public waste and public mismanagement is compromised as the Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a senior member of the AUDIT COMMISSION. That is why LORD TOM SAWYER as outgoing chairman of the Trust suggested to the internal communications department of the Trust and to 'the uninitiated' that the appointment of GERARD LEMOS was 'a coup' - when in reality GERARD LEMOS and LAWRENCE SAWYER were both very close and very good friends - both Labour Party members.
It has not been mentioned that GERARD LEMOS was given a CMG as a 'decoration to dangle'. This was not done merely to reward a misplaced vanity. CMG is commonly known as a 'CALL ME GOD' award! Yet those more jaded or more realistic see the award as a reward for political favours or for 'keeping their nose clean' and not causing any embarrassment to the political party. His award was recommended by the Labour Party.
Like a Kafkaesque or Stalinist state - the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST appears to be a system that requires total control. Total life control for the Party by the Party. This is the same thinking as the political Party in power. This was the thinking behind the purpose of implementing the ID card scheme that fell at the final days of the Labour government.
Particularly if control is orchestrated by senior members of a political Party who control local and central government and control the housing function. To add to this, the law advice centres in local areas are part funded by the local authority. This funding can be compromised if it is deemed by the housing provider which is a major Registered Social Landlord as NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that provides most of the housing for the local authority that there is a 'political' element - thereby the major landlord with significant political associations can assure and ensure that the client of the landlord is unsupported in any legal advice scenario by the law advice centre. [The threat of withdrawing funds from the local authority to the legal advice centre can be very effective in making sure the authority of the local authority is followed as directed or economies and redundancies could follow due to the 'changed economic climate'.] Witness the legal forums in the borough that are funded out of local authority funds.
Yet note that the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST rapidly runs to one of the most expensive firms of solicitors in London. Paying such phenomenal legal fees to attack the legal rights of vulnerable tenants and to seek to make such tenants homeless seems to pose no particular concern for a Trust with a charitable status that charges £335 rent per week to the local authority for an uncomfortable and insecure cramped studio flat which is not fit for human habitation with vermin as an obligatory extra in many flats.
The Trust immediately and automatically try to discredit to say no such things exist. There are no mice, the staff are well known to rapidly protest - even when faced with a large rat in front of them that was found in the tenant's flat. Medical reports and photographic evidence paints a totally different picture to the picture the Trust staff try to mislead and deceive to other tenants. An opportunity in court would prove this evidence.
Together, acting in concert, the senior management can try to succeed in wrecking the lives of many vulnerable tenants. Evidence of this abounds in large measure.
Yet NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a Trust that has various legal duties. These legal duties cannot be ignored - esspecially in a legal democracy. If the Trust breaches these legal duties it crosses the rubicon and begins to act unlawfully.
A Trust has a LEGAL DUTY for the Trustees [Chairman and fellow Trustees] to CONSULT its beneficiaries - the Tenants. If not, it acts UNLAWFULLY.
The Trust has a LEGAL DUTY for the Trustees to act in the BEST INTERESTS of the beneficiaries - the Tenants. If not, it acts UNLAWFULLY.
Many written and oral undertakings have been made by senior staff that have not been honoured.
The Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - GERARD LEMOS is now acting unlawfully by not answering any letters that are addressed to him from many tenants with legitimate complaints.
The Chief Executive - KATE DAVIES cannot plead ignorance for she is equally culpable.
Senior Management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have persisted in acting unlawfully against vulnerable tenants.
Their tactics in illegality would shock PETER RACHMAN - the slum landlord of NOTTING HILL - from which NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has its origins.
Apart from reasons of illegality, the only reason the Chairman continues to act as a person who does not want to be accountable or allow transparency can be because he has a significant amount of information to disguise or hide?
The Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - GERARD LEMOS should be aware of the effects of discrimination, bearing in mind the origins of his parents. Yet, instead of supporting discrimination he should be consulting, assisting, informing, communicating and providing help to the many tenants and not unthinkingly continuing to use the tactics of the previous Chairman, LORD TOM SAWYER together with the previous Chief Executive, Peter REDMAN and their very close political friends who were equally ruthless.
This unthinking automatic reflex is now no longer an option.
Too many tenants that have been bullied by the senior management can now support a complainant.
Kate Davies - the new Chief Executive (49) that took over from the discredited Peter REDMAN (the £117,000+ post) ("after a damning assessment of the group's performance by the sector regulator, the Housing Corporation" and "the rating of an amber warning") is a mother of three [how can she cope with such responsibilities?] who previously worked as the housing director at the London Borough of Bexley and at Brighton and Hove city council has stated on record: "I'm more interested in change than in maintenance". She was also recorded as saying: "We at Notting Hill want Tom Sawyer to remain our champion!"
- I wonder why?
Write in your views:
A Very Unhappy Beneficiary
Hell at Servite Housing
09.04.2006 11:46
You stated in your report, about being told one owed rent arrears I have had told to myself, albeit rent paid on time by the Local authority, about complaining, then all Hell breaks loose.
Have you had any reports from others living under Servite Houses as their Lanlords?
The Housing Ombudsman, ordered 'Servite Houses' to install a new heating system in this House. Servite Houses hired some DIY agents (Destroy It Yourself) from the 31st May 2005 -03rd June 2005 who said they had replaced the whole heating system.
Yet today it still is not working! We have had leaks, our home is ruined!! And we are 100 times worse off now than before the new heating system installed. I have wrote to the Prime Minister, to Watchdog, to the Audit Commissioner, to Mori, and many more, but I am akin to a mouse running around on wheel, going no where! Can you please advise ?
I thank you in anticipation of a reply,
Yours sincerely,
Sdenim
Susan Denim
e-mail:
Susan Denim
e-mail:
sdeni@aol.com
Draft Charities Bill DCH 77 Notting Hill Housing Trust Charity Shops
10.04.2006 01:59
From: Heavingham, Jenni [
Sent: 16 June 2004 15:46
To: '
Subject: submission to the joint committee
On behalf of Notting Hill Housing Trust Charity shops.
l would like to fully support the submission made by the association of Charity shops regarding the de-regulatory measure set out in section 66 C(2) of the draft bill. The requirement to notify the precise day or date and location of each collection we make for our shops would be totally detrimental to our work it would undermine much needed funds raised by our shops for good causes. We like most other charity shops rely heavily on our door-to-door collections to keep our shops running, in turn this provides a very eco friendly way for recycling textiles ,books, and much more. The requirement does not bear out the cost that would be incurred and is unworkable for a small chain of shops like ours to administer
Amendment sought
* l agree with the association of Charity shops that paragraph 66 C(2)
of the draft bill should be amended so that the notification required for the collection of goods house-to-house by the charities local authorities should be made only on a periodic basis (e.g. annually) and in very general terms regarding timing/frequency and location. It should not be required for every individual collection
Jenni Heavingham
Retail Manager for the Notting Hill Housing Trust Charity Shops
NHHT is a Charity incorporated as an Industrial and Provident Society limited by shares registered in England (16558R) ________________________________________________________________________
Draft Charities Bill
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft Bill.
The Guinness Trust is a 'registered social landlord' (RSL) as well as a registered charity. As a RSL the Trust is also regulated by the Housing Corporation.
My comments and the suggestions are brief and are as follows:
Social housing
1. I note that 'social housing' is not included as a charitable purpose but I imagine that the purposes listed at Part1, 2(2) should cover this activity. I wonder whether the Charity Commission will provide guidance on this activity?
Public benefits
2. I wonder whether the phrase "public benefit" test is best left undefined in the Bill? If so, will guidance be available from the Commission on what may demonstrate that adequate public benefit is derived from an activity for it to be a charitable purpose? I would certainly welcome guidance in due course.
Interest management by Charitable RSL's
3. As a developing RSL, the Guinness Trust takes out loans from banks and building societies to produce new or improved social housing. These loans may be at fixed or variable interest rates. Prudent management means that we try to manage our exposure to movements in interest rates. Although the Housing Corporation assesses whether a RSL has the systems and skills to enter into the financial instruments/interest rate hedging products, the Commission has its own process. This means there is double scrutiny.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'We believe the "public benefit" test should remain undefined in the Bill and reliant on existing and to be developed case law.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BRIEFING PAPER FOR THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE DRAFT CHARITIES BILL
THE CHARITY COMMISSION, PUBLIC BENEFIT AND THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION
1 This document consolidates the contents of the two briefing papers the Charity Commission produced at the request of the Joint Committee concerning public benefit and the effect of the proposed legislation.
It deals with :-
the current law as regards public benefit;
the Commission's existing practice when examining public benefit in charities;
the effect of the proposed legislation on public benefit and how the Commission envisages case law on public benefit might develop following enactment of the proposed legislation; and
how tests for public benefit will be applied in future by the Commission in respect of charities, and sets out the limitations when applying these tests to those charities whose purposes are educational or for the relief of poverty.
A The Current Law
2 Public benefit is a requirement for all organisations which profess to be charitable. All charities must show that they exist for the public benefit. This means that they serve either the community as a whole or a sufficient (appreciably important) section of the community. The general principles are that the number of those eligible to benefit must not be negligible, they must constitute a group or class which can be considered to be a public class and any defining connecting link must not be a personal relationship such as family or employer/ee. The court or the Commission determine what is a sufficient section of the community by examining the class of individuals to be benefited in relation to the charitable purposes declared. The class may be limited by reference to particular types of charitable need, by geographical area and by other criteria consistent with the charitable purposes.
3 A number of other factors may affect public benefit including:-
whether any individuals or other organisations (other than those who should properly benefit from the charitable services) are significantly benefiting or profiting from the charity;
where the charitable services are available only to a charity's members, any restrictions on who can be a member, which are inconsistent with the charitable purposes;
physical access to buildings and land, where that is relevant to delivery of the charitable purpose;
where the level of fees charged for services may have the effect of excluding the less well off, whether there is alternative provision for access to services for those unable to pay; and
whether the charity confers any indirect public benefit (e.g. relief of the public sector).
4 Currently, the first three heads of charity, namely for the relief of poverty, the advancement of education and the advancement of religion, enjoy a presumption of public benefit. This means public benefit is recognised as established and need not be demonstrated unless any doubt arises. For charities with purposes in the fourth head, it must be positively shown.
5 Although all charities must have an element of public benefit, these rules are applied flexibly to different categories of charity. For charities for the relief of poverty and the advancement of education, the public benefit rules have some exceptional features.
(i) Relief of Poverty
6 In the case of charities for the relief of poverty, the pool from which the intended beneficiaries may be chosen may be more narrowly drawn than for other charitable purposes.
7 A charity for the relief of poverty may define its beneficiaries by reference to a personal connection or tie (such as family relationship or the same employer). For example, a gift for the poor relations of the person setting up a charity or a benevolent fund for the poor employees of a particular company would not fall foul of the public benefit requirements.
8 The case law which establishes these principles is specified in section A of Annex A. Although a departure from general public benefit principles, these principles are well settled in the law and are applied by the court and the Commission.
(ii) Educational Purposes
9 Following the general public benefit principles outlined in 2 above, the beneficiaries of charities for the advancement of education cannot be defined by a personal connection or tie (e.g. family relationship or employment). Trusts for the education of particular family members or employees of a company do not form a sufficient section of the public and cannot be regarded as charitable as lacking the requirement of public benefit.
10 Historically, however, the court has accepted as charitable educational trusts giving preference to the founder's relatives (sometimes called the founder's kin cases). A charity for educational purposes with a specific provision wishing (rather than requiring) preference to be given to a particular group of children or people may be established provided that the trustees act reasonably and properly in exercising the preference.
11 The case law which deals with these principles is referred to in section B of Annex A.
12 There is also a line of legal authority established by the court which indicates that, for charitable independent schools, a narrow beneficiary class which may have the effect of confining educational benefits to those who are relatively well off is acceptable for charity. The original case related to the beneficiary class as described in the purposes of a school for the sons of gentlemen. The narrowness was a consequence of the way in which those eligible to attend the school were defined in its charitable purposes, but the principle also applies if access is narrowed in other ways, including by the level of fees charged.
13 The legal authorities which deal with these principles are specified in section C of Annex A. Although a departure from general public benefit principles, the principles established in these cases are well settled in law and are applied by the court and the Commission.
14 The Commission's existing practice in examining public benefit in charities, both at the time of registration and subsequently, is set out in Annex B.
B Effect of the Proposed Legislation on Public Benefit and Developing the Existing Case Law on Public Benefit
15 The proposed legislation provides that a charity will have to have purposes which fall within those defined in the new legislation and be for the public benefit. The presumption of public benefit will be removed.
16 The effect of this will be that the existence of public benefit will need to be addressed at any time the charitable status of an organisation is being considered by the court or the Commission. This will be done by reference to the common law rules which currently govern the law on public benefit, which will be preserved.
17 In exercising its powers to register and de-register charities, the Commission will continue to develop the law on the legal meaning of charity after the proposed legislation is enacted both as regards the purpose for which a charity may be established (in recognising new charitable purposes) and as regards public benefit. In doing so it will take account of the fact that the presumption of public benefit has been removed.
18 The Commission will follow the court's approach in developing the law in the context of changing economic and social circumstances and statutory amendments to the law. It is already well established that the quantum of public benefit may well vary from charity to charity. It is also inevitable that the court's notion of public benefit may vary with the passing of time.
19 The existing case law would need to be applied to the modern context in which charities now operate and in light of the new legislation. The exceptions to general public benefit principles referred to paragraphs 6 to 13 above are part of current case law and organisations have been recognised as charities on that basis over significant periods of time. The removal of the presumption of public benefit as proposed by the legislation would probably not change this. The Commission would not be able simply to over-ride these exceptions given that they have been specifically addressed by the court and allowed to stand.
C The Proposed Legislation - How the Commission Would Assess Public Benefit
At Registration
20 As is the case now, the Commission would use the information on the application form to assess, not only whether the purposes are charitable, but also whether the charity is for the public benefit.
21 If the presumption of public benefit were removed, this would mean that a positive assessment of public benefit would need to be established in each case. The Commission would revise its application form to the effect that every applicant would have to provide information on the form about how public benefit is satisfied in the case of the organisation applying for registration.
22 In some cases (as now), it would be evident from the information provided, or even self evident, that public benefit is present. This will depend upon the nature of the charitable purpose(s), the proposed activities and the way in which the charity proposes to achieve them.
23 The Commission would examine and consider all the factors which may affect public benefit which are relevant to the applicant's particular circumstances.
24 Applications from organisations with purposes which are well established as being charitable in law with model governing documents and standardised activities, are unlikely to see much difference. This seems entirely consistent with the underlying aim of the Strategy Unit review to make it easier for charities to set up and grow. Applications from newer organisations or those with novel purposes (even those within the new description of purposes in the proposed legislation) are likely to face greater scrutiny where the purposes concerned would fall within those currently covered by the presumption. If it has not been shown that public benefit is present then the Commission would ask for further information. Advice may be provided, where it is possible, about how to alter or restructure the activities so as to satisfy the public benefit requirement. If public benefit could not be demonstrated, the application for registration must be rejected.
25 In carrying forward its registration work, the Commission will have full regard to the need to balance risk and proportionality in assessing applications for registration and will apply this approach in considering all issues that arise including public benefit.
Ongoing Regulation (Public Character Checks)
26 Bearing in mind that the proposed legislation will not change the existing legal definition of public benefit, but in seeking to be in line with the proposals set out in the SU Report, the Commission proposes to carry out scoping exercises on fee charging and other relevant areas for groups of charities where charging is a feature. This will be undertaken in full consultation with the professional or umbrella bodies representing these charities. The Commission proposes to publish the results in a series of regulatory reports. These will identify for the respective subsectors how the public benefit requirements are currently met and how they might be met in the future. It is hoped that subsector best practice may be developed from this, again in consultation with the subsectors involved.
27 Once the proposed legislation has been enacted the Commission would look at the position of existing charities, including those registered under a presumption of public benefit where concerns have been raised, or where there is the potential for concerns to be raised, about whether they meet public benefit requirements. The Commission would look initially at the fee charging sectors. The Commission would undertake this exercise to assure itself that these organisations have a public character or, in other words, provide a benefit to the public.
28 This assurance will include an assessment of whether:
an organisation is established for a purpose which may be recognised as charitable; and
it benefits the community, or a sufficient section of the community.
29 Assessing benefit to the community will include consideration of the range of factors described above at paragraphs 2 and 3.
30 Subsequently, if the Commission identified individual charities which did not meet the public character expectations or requirements, it would consider taking further action. This action might range from working with the charity to ensure it organises its activities to benefit a sufficient section of the community and thus meet its charitable purposes, to taking regulatory action to ensure compliance with the public benefit rules and, in extreme cases, redirecting assets to other charitable purposes close to any purposes that have ceased to be charitable, where it is not possible for the organisation to meet the public benefit test.
31 The Commission could also build an assessment of public benefit into our ongoing regulatory assessments, such as through review visits, where appropriate. For example, the Commission would include an assessment of public benefit for those charities where this has been identified as a possible issue, for example because the charity charges fees for its services.
32 Because case law on public benefit deals with different categories of charity differently, the extent to which change in a charity's practice could be required, rather than encouraged, would vary. For areas where this was the case (particularly in relation to charities established for poor relations and poor employees and certain educational charities including independent schools, which are referred to in paragraphs 6 to 13 above) the development of a self regulatory approach owned by the particular sub sector would be likely to be necessary. For all other categories of charity, regulatory intervention by the Charity Commission, where it was required, would be possible.
33 The Commission would encourage such groups of charities, and their representative bodies, to develop sector owned guidance and best practice standards which are relevant to the circumstances of that particular group of charities (i.e. a self-regulatory approach). This guidance might include, for example, a best practice view on what represents a level of access which is appropriate to the group of charities' particular circumstances.
34 This 'self-regulation' approach also assumes that the proposed legislation will continue to provide the Commission with an advisory function, in order to enable us to work with groups of charities, and their advisers, in the way outlined above.
Charity Commission
17 June 2004
Draft Committee Charities Bill
Sean Bryson's website is Offensive
10.04.2006 23:43
However, on the face of it, Sean Bryson himself has been set up by the Notting Hill Housing Trust and abused. The severity of his living conditions amplified by his problems with anti social neighbours has been integrated with discrimination inflicted on him by his landlord, Notting Hill Housing Trust. I believe this has driven him to hold such a misconcenived point of view. A deliberate social engineering ploy by Notting Hill Housing Trust.
Charles Evans
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - ABUSE OF TENANTS
23.04.2006 20:16
GROW UP AND ACT RESPONSIBLY
PEOPLE LIKE KATE DAVIES WERE THE WRONG CHOICE FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE
sue
e-mail:
spowell@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - TENANTS RIGHTS ARE BEING ABUSED
25.04.2006 11:56
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - TRUSTEES (1)
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST- TRUSTEES (2)
WHY IS 26% OF ALL UNACCOUNTABLE MONEY GOING INTO NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST SPENT ON MANAGEMENT - ACCORDING TO THE NON INDEPENDENTLY AUDITED ACCOUNTS
WHY IS NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST NOT ACCOUNTABLE TO PARLIAMENT THROUGH THE NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (NAO) RATHER IT IS UNACCOUNTABLE TO THE AUDIT COMMISSION (UN)ACCOUNTABLE TO THE EXECUTIVE)?
WHY ARE ALL DIRECTORS/TRUSTEES OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST MEMBERS OF THE LABOUR PARTY?
WHY ARE CONFRONTATIONAL TACTICS USED BY THE MANAGEMENT OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST AGAINST DECENT TENANTS?
PRESUMABLY, BECAUSE SUCH TACTICS ARE SUPPORTED BY THE LABOUR PARTY -IF MEMBERS OF THE LABOUR PARTY CONTROL NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST?
WHY DO THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT NOT COMMUNICATE OR CONSULT WITH TENANTS AS A MATTER OF COURSE?
WHY IS IT THAT ANY TENANT WHO RAISES LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS IN WRITING TO THE MANAGEMENT IS IMMEDIATELY PLACED IN PURPORTED RENT ARREARS (IS IT NOT THE CASE THAT THE LOCAL AUTHORITY THAT PROVIDES HOUSING BENEFIT IS PROVIDED WITH HOUSING FROM THE HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS SUCH AS THE FLAGSHIP HOUSING ASSOCIATION - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - IS IT NOT THE CASE THAT THERE IS A STEADY TRANSFER OF STAFF FROM THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HOUSING DEPARTMENT - THAT ALSO PROCESSES HOUSING BENEFIT AND COUNCIL TAX - TO THE HOUSING ASSOCIATION AND FROM THE HOUSING ASSOCIATION TO THE LOCAL AUTHORITY - A RELATIONSHIP OF CRONYISM - A RELATIONSHIP OF MUTUAL BENEFIT - IS IT NOT THE CASE THAT THE LOCAL AUTHORITY FUNDS HOUSING ADVICE CENTRES AND PART FUNDS THE LAW CENTRES - ENSURING A MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST)?
WHY DOES THE FLAGSHIP HOUSING ASSOCIATION SO READILY AND SO ROBUSTLY WITH IMMEDIACY REFER TENANTS TO THE LOCAL COUNTY COURT WHEN THEIR RENT IS PAID IN FULL AND DIRECT BY THE LOCAL AUTHOITY (WHY THE LACK OF CONSULTATION - WHY THE LACK OF COMMUNICATION - WHY THE IMMEDIATE CONFRONTATION - WHY THE NEED FOR TENANTS FROM HELL TO BE RAPIDLY PLACED NEXT TO ANY TENANT THAT RAISES LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS IN WRITING - WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH ALL THE UNACCOUNTABLE AND VAST TAXPAYERS MONEY THAT IS LEFT IN THE TRUST AS UNACCOUNTABLE PROFITS - WHY THE NEED FOR 21 CHARITY SHOPS - A " CHARITY " - YOU MUST BE JOKING - WHAT ABOUT ALL THE FREE TRIPS THAT MANAGEMENT HAVE UNDERTAKEN FOR " FACT-FINDING " TRIPS TO SOUTH AFRICA)?
ANSWERS TO ALL THESE (AND MANY MORE) QUESTIONS NEED TO BE URGENTLY AND IMMEDIATELY FORTHCOMING !
another discriminated tenant
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST: COMPLAINTS? YES, COMPLAINTS!
27.04.2006 17:58
Maxine Carr writes of abuse of the rights of her son. I'm not too sure what to say, as I'm not fully familiar with that situation. Yet, I intend to find out.
Jason mentions that there is a Complaints Procedure to direct complaints from respectable tenants with legitimate complaints to the management at Notting Hill Housing Trust.
Barry Lindsey speaks about Innocent until proven Guilty??? Not at Notting Hill Housing Trust.
He states that the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust have been known to mention the DATA PROTECTION ACT [1998] and to hide behind it. How surprising! The Data Protection Act was meant to PROTECT the 'Data-Subject', who is the Tenant faced with the fact that private and confidential unauthorised unlawful information is constantly being inputted on the computer system about the tenant - the Beneficiary of the Charitable Trust. This is being done UNLAWFULLY, if UNTRUE information is being placed without the CONSENT of the tenant. I notice how the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust are extremely selective as to their knowledge of the provisions of the Act - one might even use the word 'ignorant' of the Act.
The axiom 'Ignorance is no defence as to not being aware of the provisions of the law.'
This makes Notting Hill Housing liable to ANY breaches of the law. Of which there are many!
I have documemtary proof that Notting Hill Housing Trust are UNLAWFULLY in breach of the DATA PROTECTION ACT in the misuse and abuse of their computer system.
All tenants are entitled to a FULL RECORD of the information held on the COMPUTER data-base of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
One tenant mentions his anti-social neighbour. He will know that this is no coincidence. Is it not the case that Mr Lindsey is a MEMBER of a very powerful political party that poses a DIRECT threat to the LABOUR PARTY. Is that not the real reason he has been targeted? Is it not the case that the respectable tenant, Mr Lindsey has complained in writing to Notting Hill Housing Trust about his anti-social neighbours that are harassing him, as a good friendly sociable, helpful, charitable, gentleman and unlawfully harassing his respectable wife. How dare landlords act in such a cowardly unlawful way to such law abiding people who have an automatic legal right to quiet enjoyment of their flat. Is it not the real reason why 'Tenants from Hell' have been deliberately placed next to the respectable tenant, because he asserted his legal rights and made a legitimate complaint in writing to the management. Mr Lindsey's "crime" is that he put it in writing. This is an "unforgivable sin" as understood by the twisted, perverse, management policies of Notting Hill Housing Trust.
He knows his MP - he knows the Councillors for his Ward in his Borough of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM! Yes, HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM!
The FLAGSHIP BOROUGH in the UK
IF THIS FALLS - Notting Hill Housing Trust FALLS TOO!
All the policies of the LABOUR PARTY would then be in tatters.
The CHAIRMAN [LABOUR PARTY member] would then be obliged to resign.
The BOARD OF DIRECTORS [LABOUR PARTY members] would then be obliged to resign.
The CHIEF EXECUTIVE [LABOUR PARTY member] would then be obliged to resign.
Please note that the flagship Housing Association (HA)/Registered Social Landlord (RSL) which is Notting Hill Housing Trust has extremely good relations with the Local Authority (L/A) as long as it remains LABOUR. If it FALLS, Notting Hill Housing Trust management FALLS.
Mr Lindsey seems to be well aware that it is common knowledge amongst tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust that as soon as a tenant is flagged up on the expensive 'tailor-made' Notting Hill Housing Trust computer system as a 'Problem Tenant' - meaning a problem to Notting Hill Housing Trust management - translated in normal understanding as a good respectable tenant who has complained in writing for legitimate and laudable reasons - invariably a person who is a good, respectable, sociable tenant - that as a knee-jerk reaction by Notting Hill Housing Trust:
ACTION 1 - Place the tenant in PURPORTED RENT ARREARS - irrespective that the Rent is paid in FULL and DIRECT by the Local Authority.
Is it possible for the Local Authority to go along with this scam by 'inhibiting' payments?
Look at the massive Conflict of Interest
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
PRIVATE INTEREST of Local Authority (L/A) [The L/A now gets its housing from the flagship HA/RSL) PUBLIC DUTY of flagship HA/RSL is to act as a reasonable landlord (L/L).
There is a crossover of staff from LA to flagship HA/RSL and from HA/RSL to L/L.
Both Protect and Support each other.
Similarly, all Housing Centres in the Borough are paid by the L/A.
All Law Centres in the Borough are paid by the L/A.
The Housing Centres and Law Centres have a policy - do NOT sue the L/A.
See the (LABOUR) Connection?
Central Government - LABOUR PARTY
Local Government - LABOUR PARTY
Flagship HA/RSL - Notting HIll Housing Trust - LABOUR PARTY
The Institutions PROTECT and SUPPORT each other.
The Institutions PROTECT and SUPPORT the LABOUR hierarchy SECRET SCHEME.
The only way to deal with Notting Hill Housing Trust is NOT through the HOUSING OMBUDSMAN (whose deliberations are in PRIVATE and not open to re-examination!) but through the following remedies:
i) POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT (DO NOT CONTACT THE LABOUR PARTY - THEY DO NOT SUPPORT TENANTS NOR THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND THE SECRET SCHEME WHICH IS TO HOUSE, IN THE BEST PROPERTIES, NON-INDIGENOUS CITIZENS WHO HAVE PRIORITY IN THE USE OF UNACCOUNTABLE TAXPAYERS FUNDING INTO HAs/RSLs)
INDIGENOUS CITIZENS ARE GRANTED INFERIOR PROPERTIES IN MASSIVE DISREPAIR
ii) MEDIA EMBARASSMENT [BE SELECTIVE AS TO WHICH NEWSPAPERS!]
iii) EFFECTIVE TENANT DEMONSTRATION IN THE MEDIA
iv) COURT INJUNCTION (AN ORDER) AGAINST NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - THIS IS EASY TO OBTAIN - CONTACT MR LINDSEY - FOR MORE ADVICE - TO BRING US ALL TOGETHER!
LET US NO LONGER SUFFER IN SILENCE - WE MUST SHOW MR BLAIR !
WHO SHOULD GET OUR PROPERTIES HELD IN TRUST - YOU OR OTHERS WHO HAVE NOT CONTRIBUTED ONE PENNY TO THE SYSTEM?
Break the mould - DO NOT VOTE LABOUR on Thursday, 4 MAY 2006
Keep the same (political party) - you remain a VICTIM - THE VICTIM!
How many other tenants are in the same situation? Every tenant who has been flagged up as 'a Problem' by the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust onto the computer system - perhaps monitoring by the local authority on the Closed Circuit TeleVision (CCTV) monitoring that goes back to Hammersmith & Fulham Town Hall based on the Ground Floor office, close to the reception desk, inside the King Street Town Hall main building (all 350 cameras monitoring - 'including targeted tenants'? - 7 days a week 24 hours a day). The system can be used to good effect to generate much needed revenue - but - can it not be abused?
Notting Hill Housing Trust tend to be silent about other legislation - an important part of European Law incorporated into UK domestic law introduced in 1998 -
THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998.
This gives Legal Rights to Beneficiaries/Tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust.
Then there is THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000.
This gives Legal Rights to Beneficiaries/Tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust to find out information from the management of the Trust - and the Chairman and Board of Directors of the Trust as Trustees of the Trust. The Chief Executive is employed by the Board of Directors of the Trust. Employed to COMMUNICATE and CONSULT not to CONFRONT and CAVIL.
Keith Henley speaks of Fraud going on within Notting HiIl Housing Trust.
Certainly, it is well known that the management of Notting HIll Housing Trust were misappropriating (read: 'stealing') some of the housing stock of 18,000+ properties that are the property of Notting HIll Housing Trust - that is held in Trust - for the benefit of the Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust. The Chairman and the Board of Trustees, read the Board of Directors of Notting Hill Housing Trust, have a legal duty and a duty of Trust to ensure that the housing stock is not misappropriated (read: 'stolen') by any of the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust. Neither done collectively or severally (read: 'individually'). Neither done in collusion with management or done on an internally collective basis. Whether done in the form of a CONSPIRACY (a group of more than one person who agreed to act to commit an unlawful purpose) or in the form of a basic FRAUD.
Based on the mass of documentary evidence gleaned to date, Notting Hill Housing Trust needs to be carefully scrutinized and scrutinized independently - this is not the case - there is no independent scrutiny of the properties of Notting Hill Housing Trust - there is no independent accountable scrutiny of the properties - there is no independent scrutiny of the unlimited taxpayers funding that is going into Notting Hill Housing Trust.
24 BILLION POUNDS [24,000,000,000 pounds] of taxpayers money has gone into HAs/RSLs
This is UNACCOUNABLE.
It is accountable to the AUDIT COMMISSION, the organ of the Executive and TONY BLAIR as head of the LABOUR PARTY - NOT the NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (NAO) the organ of PARLIAMENT. This makes taxpayers money going into Notting Hill Housing Trust UNACCOUNTABLE.
The previous Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - GERARD LEMOS (of Indian ancestry) was appointed:
i) COMMISSIONER of the AUDIT COMMISSION - by TONY BLAIR [on the recommendation of the mentor of GERARD LEMOS and fellow LABOUR PARTY member LABOUR PARTY LORD] LORD TOM SAWYER the previous Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust described as "Our Champion" by Kate Davies (another member of the LABOUR PARTY who came out of the woodwork that day)! Members of the Audit Commission are Civil Servants. Members of the Audit Commission are subject to the directives of the Audit Commission Commissioners! The Audit Commission writes reports and assesspes the quality of HAs/RSLs like Notting Hill Housing Trust. Yes, that is what GERARD LEMOS was appointed to do before he was appointed by the LABOUR PARTY to the Board of Notting Hill Housing Trust - Conflict of Interst? - YOU BET!!! MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST!!!
ii) COMMISSIONER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION [recommended by LORD SAWYER] controls the British Civil Service. Members of the Audit Commission are subject to the directives of the Civil Service Commission.
iii) DEPUTY CHAIRMAN to LABOUR LORD, LORD NEIL KINNOCK appointed on the BRITISH COUNCIL (noted for being full of Sleaze, Nepotism and Cronyism) meant to promote British Culture - some say a massive unaccountable waste of taxpayers money.
iv) CHAIRMAN of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [Nominated by LABOUR PARTY LORD, LORD SAWYER the previous LABOUR PARTY Chairman]
- no prizes for identifying the massive CONFLICTS OF INTEREST!
v) GERARD LEMOS runs a business partnership LEMOS & CRANE at the top of Highgate Hill and LABOUR LORD, LORD TOM SAWYER arranged him to enjoy a lucrative business consultancy to draft policies for Notting HIl Housing Trust and to research books based in COLVILLE, a political district known as a WARD, located in the area of high property prices in Kensington & Chelsea where Notting Hill Housing promote policies to house the 'right people' at Notting Hill Housing Trust - negative discrimination policies - that would do justice to a Banana Republic with a(n elective) dictatorship in power.
The body that controls Notting Hill Housing Trust is the HOUSING CORPORATION which comes under the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) - The Executive (not Parliament) once again and makes it UNACCOUNTABLE! Notting Hill Housing Trust receives taxpayers money from this unaccountable body - just like Notting HIll Housing Trust is inspected by a body controlled by the Executive (not Parliament) - thereby making it UNACCOUNTABLE!
That being the case, the tenants are hit - attacked - and hit hard by the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust - clearly, as a way of trying to suppress the evidence if illegallity.
Yet, a breach of trust has happened and I have proof that this has taken place under the Chairmanship of LABOUR PARTY member, Gerard Lemos and with LABOUR PARTY member, Kate Davies as Chief Executive. I have the witnesses to prove it.
This is the reason why the previous Chief Executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust, PETER REDMAN, a member of the LABOUR PARTY, was obliged to resign with immediate effect. Anywhere else it would constitute Gross Misconduct. This means NO possibility of any Termination Payment. Yet, this is Notting Hill Housing Trust, with unaccountable taxpayers money, Deviously Clever (tactics can be invoked?)!
So a Secret PAY OFF was made out of Trust funds - a Breach of Trust was thereby effected. This means it is possible to initiate a Legal Action against the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust.
It was recorded in an authoritative journal of property as 'Property People' using the quaint euphemism that the LABOUR PARTY member, PETER REDMAN was obliged to 'Fall on his Sword'. Indeed, the truth is that PETER REDMAN was 'pushed' by his LABOUR PARTY more senior 'friend' in the LABOUR PARTY. He was made to be the FALL GUY! Certainly not, LABOUR LORD, LORD TOM SAWYER, ex Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust, the ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY, who was appointed as Chairman by his good friend TONY BLAIR, LABOUR PARTY British Prime Minister. Who is now out of his depth in SLEAZE with a capital S or is it a capital C for CORRUPTION? - the jury is still out. The verdict will come in decisively and unequivocally on THURSDAY, 4 MAY 2006 at the date of the Local Elections.
LABOUR OUT - LABOUR OUT - LABOUR OUT
That is what most of the Tenants will say who do not like the Management of Notting Hill Housing Trust and the way the tenants have all been treated like imbeciles without a Brain.
We have news for you - LABOUR PARTY!
I voted before for the LABOUR PARTY - but never again.
I never realised it was the LABOUR PARTY that was setting me up as a FALL GUY as they did to PETER REDMAN.
LORD TOM SAWYER, senior member of the LABOUR PARTY should have taken the CAN but they got poor junior member of the LABOUR PARTY, PETER REDMAN and Chief Executive of Notting HIll Housing Trust to take the RAP.
PETER REDMAN received a secret unaccountable pay off from out of the unaccountable funds of Notting Hill Housing Trust!
COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
YES, there is a Complaints Procedure at Notting HIll Housing Trust.
It is Internal - It is not Trusted by tenants because it is acknowledged even by its own staff as not worthy of the title 'Complaints Procedure'.
A COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE is:
INDEPENDENT
CAN BE RELIED UPON
TRANSPARENT
TREATED IN GOOD FAITH
ACCOUNTABLE
RESPECTED
CONSULTATIVE
AIMS TO ELICIT THE AGREED FACTS
AIMS TO SEEK AN AGREED SOLUTION
SEEKS TO ACHIEVE A REASONABLE OUTCOME
OUTCOME IS UPHELD BY BOTH PARTIES
Everything about Notting Hill Housing Trust reeks of Sleaze, Deceit and Impropriety.
Further, the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust cannot be trusted.
Lies, Misrepresentations, Deceits and Dissembling - these are invariably relied upon by Notting Hill Housing Trust.
It is well known by many of the tenants that the 21 Charity Shops in the most expensive locations of London are a money laundering scam. Why would a Charitible Trust with some 4 Billion pounds [4,000,000,000] worth of property which is known for charging extortionate rents and using deceitful management practices of which PETER RACHMAN the notorious evil landlord of Notting Hill would have been proud. Indeed the present Notting Hill Housing Trust now has the support of the most senior members of the LABOUR PARTY to practice evil wicked deeds. One of which is to give priority to non indigenous citizens. Such citizens are allocated the most luxurious properties. There is no disrepair in those properties - they are not put in rent arrears. They are left alone and left in credit. The most damp properties that are in the greatest of disrepair are specifically allocated to indigenous citizens.
If they dare to complain in writing with legitimate complaints, such indigenous tenants are immediately placed in purported Rent Arrears with selected Statements of Account. More lies!
Yes, Mr Lindsey - I have a whole file of Statements of Account and letters to various Notting Hill Housing Trust tenants who have been falsely, deceifully and deliberately placed in Rent Arrears. The (underhand and deliberate) motive of Notting Hill Housing Trust management - to seek an Eviction. Actions as these contitute Harassment. There is a law that protects tenants from such unlawful actions as these - The Protection From Harassment Act 1997. [+ Protection From Eviction Act 1977 is also useful (it is there to protect tenants).]
Another (deceitful and deliberate) tactic Notting Hill Housing Trust (ab)use to great effect in a position of Abuse of Trust - the getting of tenants to sign two tenancies.
Deviously Clever.
One tenancy appears to give rights and does give rights.
Yet when Notting Hill Housing Trust want to change the goal-posts (the rules) [when it has learnt something new about the tenant - placed onto its expensive computer system without my knowledge and in breach of law, such as the unlawful use of my personal and private information - the breach of the right to: i) respect for my private and family life and ii) fredom of expression [Human Rights Act 1998, Schedule 1, Article 8 and Article 10].
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST PLEASE NOTE:
ARTICLE 8
RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
Further Note:
It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to break into a tenants home.
It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to commit Criminal Damage to a tenants personal property.
It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to steal/misappropriate a tenants personal property.
It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to HARASS a tenant whilst in the 'demised' property.
All tenants are entilted to the (Implied) COVENANT of QUIET ENJOYMENT
It is unlawful for a solicitor to lie to promote a client, including a client as Notting Hill Housing Trust.
It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust to tamper with the mail of tenants.
It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to isolate the electricity of a tenant whist in occupation of the demised premises.
It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to allow a tenant to be placed in a property that is not safe for human habitation with darkened common parts.
It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to abdicate its responsibilities as a landlord.
If there are two tenancy contracts, the one tenancy with the greater rights is the tenancy contract that can be relied upon by the tenant. [If Notting Hill Housing Trust were to deviously seek an eviction, by proxy, by persuading a tenant to sign a tenancy agreement which gives the tenant less security for the same property - the tenancy for the same property with the greater security is the tenancy that will be upheld by any court. This can be enforced in the local County Court (depending on the location of the tenant's address). That is basic property law. The law has not been changed for the convenience of Notting Hill Housing Trust. Otherwise, all landlords would try the same underhand methods and get away with it. Just because a landlord might persuade a tenant to sign a second tenancy agreement in relation to the same property - this does not make the second agreement lawful - yet this evidence of the second tenancy - if the first tenancy agreement can be produced - an important inference can be drawn - this documentary evidence does go to the (devious) state of (corrupted?perverse?) mind of the (confrontational? hostile?) management (style) of Notting Hill Housing Trust! (as it is extremely difficult to terminate a secure tenancy - the management tend to set up HARASSMENT by PROXY to evict a tenant - if proved by the tenant - these constitute compelling grounds of HARASSMENT by the landlord against the tenant - particularly if the tenant is a vulnerable tenant)(Media involvement - Court involvement - Direct Action - Group Action all have their part to play - just as easily as the management are appointed - just as easily they are dismissed - for Gross Misconduct or for 'Falling on their Swords' - and what big Swords they want to have!!!)]
ARTICLE 9
FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.
ARTICLE 10
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.
Keith Henley expresses himself about NADINE SAAKWA, as do so many other tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust, who have had the misfortune to deal with her. She is very offhand and confrontational in manner. She is arrogant and devious.
Notting Hill Housing Trust has become a byword for Confrontation and Hostility. It appears to revel in Sleaze and the Chief Executive from Servite Houses seems to support Confrontation and Hostility by management against respected tenants who are now unable to present their numerous legitimate complaints to the flagship Housing Association (HA) - otherwise known as a Registered Social Landlord (RSL) that is controlled by those who now control the LABOUR PARTY - Mr BLAIR - Mr PRESCOTT (at ODPM which controls HOUSING and RSLs/HAs around the country - the way to get votes - HOUSING = VOTES = through GERRYMANDERING communities in every political constituency - placing housing in an area and placing non indigenous citizens who are likely to be grateful for this presention of largesse for no obvious reason - most of the local citizens who pay for the scheme, in the mistaken belief it is targeted for 'Key Workers' as nurses and policemen is a deceit perpetrated on the hard working taxpayers - are most are not understanding - most of the tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust are also not understanding of this devious scheme - otherwise seen as a scam once understood). There is LORD LEVY (the qualified accountant who has no intermediary and advised BLAIR to use 'LOANS (presented as Donations - indefinite gifts - not a payment of principal to be returned with a commercial rate of interest)' not DONATIONS so that the money from BENEFICIARIES of the LABOUR PARTY would be 'off the record' and UNACCOUNTABLE - like the taxpayers money that goes through ODPM and 'audited' through the unaccounable AUDIT COMMISSION (Executive overseeing) not through the NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (Parliamentary overseeing) - through LORD SAWYER (ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY appointed as Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust by TONY BLAIR) - LABOUR LORD, LORD CLIVE SOLEY (ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY, PARLIAMENTARY LABOUR PARTY (PLP) - got the LABOUR PARTY MPs to vote for the WAR in IRAQ - he wrote that the UK Press should be strictly regulated in 'REGULATING THE PRESS' - he hated and hates RUPERT MURDOCH, he is the good friend of TONY BLAIR and even closer friend of LABOUR LORD, LORD TOM SAWYER)(Ironically he wanted to get rid of the House of Lords and was Chairman of its Select Committee to oversee its destruction!)
Their good LABOUR PARTY friend who was also previously a Councillor of Hammersmith is LABOUR PARTY member, NIC RAYNSFORD MP who was recently placed on the Board of Notting Hill Housing Trust. He has done no favours for the tenants. Just more of the same. Hostility and Confrontation from management. Unaccountability and Lack of Respect. Deceit and Impropriety. Deception and Lies.
Some 700 complaints were recorded against Notting Hill Housing Trust - only a proportion of the figures for the year were given - not the full year) what is the real figure! [As seen and presented for scrutiny in Hansard (the report of the House of Commons, in response to a Parliamentary Question from Greg Hands MP).]
Who provided THE FIGURES OF PURPORTED COMPLAINTS to Parliament?
- NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST of course (presented by LABOUR PARTY Housing Minister Phil Woolas LABOUR PARTY MP - a very good friend of the LABOUR PARTY Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST)
The STINK gets stronger as each day passes.
TONY BLAIR has very good reason to be ALARMED at yesterday's BLACK WEDNESDAY's revelations - but NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Sleaze caps them all !!!
Independent?
Transparent?
Accountable?
Trusted by Tenants?
Respected?
you have to be joking!
The LABOUR PARTY have filled the Board of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST with members of the LABOUR PARTY.
I can understand why decent tenants live in fear that many are not prepared to put their name to a public record - to be attacked by the likes of LABOUR PARTY LORD, LORD SAWYER, LABOUR PARTY LORD, LORD SOLEY, LABOUR PARTY NIC RAYNSFORD, LABOUR PARTY MP and who are able to conveniently hide behind the protective screen of parliamentary 'accountability' - the ability to attack others whilst they hide behind their privileged position to attack vulnerable tenants. This LABOUR PARTY is far worse than
any other Political Party I have ever known.
Itis no coincidence that LORD SAWYER the ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY and ex Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust and LORD SOLEY as ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY, PARLIAMENTARY LABOUR PARTY (PLP) as a Notting Hill Housing Trust adviser is able to hide in the dark of the shadows.
The ex Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust made sure that his successor the Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust set up policies developed to discriminate against tenants - negative discrimination - in favour of the managing tenants - rather than managing the properties! From where did Mr GERARD LEMOS get his blueprints to condone active discrimination against tenants under the Housing management control system?
He studied History and applied the knowledge that Chairman Mao used in China in his tyrannical, unaccountable, non transparent DICTATORSHIP.
Look what Mr Lemos introduced as his discredited management policies into Notting Hill Housing Trust. As a result of the brewing scandal, as with the untimely departure of LABOUR PARTY LORD, LORD SAWYER with 45+ Trust properties that were misappropriated.
Mr GERARD LEMOS supported Non Communication and Confrontation by management against tenants. The new Chairman, LABOUR PARTY member, Alan Cole speaks about the "good seeds that the previous Chairman has sown". Clearly, he is adopting the same policies. These are being enforced by the Chief Executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust (Kate Davies) which she used with arrogance and hostility when Chief Executive at Servite Houses. Many tenants knew her when they were in one of the 14,000+ homes based in Merseyside, London or down on the south coast. In her post as Chief Executive there she was known for her arrogant, hostile and confrontational attitude to tenants. She did not repond to letters of legitimate complaint from respectable tenants.
Is it right for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to brick up the access to a tenants windows to deny access to the tenants windows? [The Legal Right to Light.]
Is it right for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to brick up the access to deny access to the tenants garden? [The Legal Right to an Easement.]
Is it right for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to steal a tenants files that the tenant is using in a legal action against the landlord? [Burglary.][+ CRIMINAL DAMAGE]
Is it right for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to break into a tenants flat to try to unlawfully evict a tenant? [BREAK IN AND ENTRY.][+ CRIMINAL DAMAGE][Breach of the Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment.]
Yes, these and much more NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has done in an effort to demonstrate that CONFRONTATION and HOSTILITY is the management style! The same style the Chairman appears to voluntarily accept and endorse.
The dog usually wags his tail - no, with Notting Hill Housing Trust, it appeared that the tail of the dog appeared to wag the dog? But on closer inspection and scrutiny it is pellucid and patent that the LABOUR PARTY truly controls the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
That is why NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST appear to act without a care of the law...
- they ARE the LAW!
- they ARE the GOVERNMENT!
See what is going on - 'BLACK WEDNESDAY' 26 APRIL 2006 -
THE CHICKENS - WITH A CONTAGIOUS VIRUS - ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST!
I AM ASKED THE QUESTION:
Have you a COMPLAINT?
NOTTING HOUSING TRUST -
NO, I DO NOT HAVE ONE COMPLAINT - I HAVE COUNTLESS COMPLAINTS AGAINST NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - AND THE LABOUR PARTY THAT HAS DECEIVED ME!
john
e-mail:
john_smith_mail@hotmail.com
Servite Housing Trust-MR MATTHEW FOX/KATE DAVIES
28.04.2006 12:35
I wrote in around a year ago, regarding the trust to who I am unfortunately a Tenant of : 'Servite Houses' based in Hammersmith.
Servite's had Kate Davies as thier Chief Executive until around July or August 2004....I thought 'Lucky me I may at long last get some progress from the new Chief Executive'...... How wrong I was!
MR MATTHEW FOX (Servite's Chief Executive since August 2004) is unfortunately from the same mould as Kate Davis!
It is amazing Kate Davis left Servites and stepped straight into another job as 'Chief Executive'.
She was reported to the Housing Ombudsman, when She was 'working' (for want of a better word) for Servites.
She had LIED for years concerning the dampness in this old dwelling and the Housing Ombudsman found Servites to be in breech of thier OWN TENANCY AGREEMENT! So Katie moved on to another Housing Trust and again as Chief Executive...It is amazing.
Now three more of Servite's employees who had stated this dwelling is in correct have all of a sudden moved on...Where to? Shepherds Bush Housing and probably Notting Hill.
IS THERE ANY OTHER TENANTS THAT HAVE SERVITES AS THIER LANDLORD?
OR DOES ANYONE KNOW ANY INFORMATION REGARDING 'SERVITE HOUSES?' based at 2 BRIDGE AVENUE LONDON W.6 9JP.
OR ANY INFO; ON WHERE MR MATTHEW fOX CAME FROM?......... ANOTHER HOUSING TRUST?
It seems to me all these Housing Trusts are all in the same boat and shaking hands.
SINCE THE HOUSING OMBUDSMAN REPORT THINGS HAVE GOT EVEN WORSE...WHICH I 'NER THOUGHT WOULD BE POSSIBLE!
SINCERELY,
Susan Denim.
S Deni
e-mail:
sdeni@aol.com
Servite Housing Trust-MR MATTHEW FOX/KATE DAVIES
28.04.2006 12:35
I wrote in around a year ago, regarding the trust to who I am unfortunately a Tenant of : 'Servite Houses' based in Hammersmith.
Servite's had Kate Davies as thier Chief Executive until around July or August 2004....I thought 'Lucky me I may at long last get some progress from the new Chief Executive'...... How wrong I was!
MR MATTHEW FOX (Servite's Chief Executive since August 2004) is unfortunately from the same mould as Kate Davis!
It is amazing Kate Davis left Servites and stepped straight into another job as 'Chief Executive'.
She was reported to the Housing Ombudsman, when She was 'working' (for want of a better word) for Servites.
She had LIED for years concerning the dampness in this old dwelling and the Housing Ombudsman found Servites to be in breech of thier OWN TENANCY AGREEMENT! So Katie moved on to another Housing Trust and again as Chief Executive...It is amazing.
Now three more of Servite's employees who had stated this dwelling is in correct have all of a sudden moved on...Where to? Shepherds Bush Housing and probably Notting Hill.
IS THERE ANY OTHER TENANTS THAT HAVE SERVITES AS THIER LANDLORD?
OR DOES ANYONE KNOW ANY INFORMATION REGARDING 'SERVITE HOUSES?' based at 2 BRIDGE AVENUE LONDON W.6 9JP.
OR ANY INFO; ON WHERE MR MATTHEW fOX CAME FROM?......... ANOTHER HOUSING TRUST?
It seems to me all these Housing Trusts are all in the same boat and shaking hands.
SINCE THE HOUSING OMBUDSMAN REPORT THINGS HAVE GOT EVEN WORSE...WHICH I 'NER THOUGHT WOULD BE POSSIBLE!
SINCERELY,
Susan Denim.
S Deni
e-mail:
sdeni@aol.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - NEGATIVE DISCRIMINATION
28.04.2006 20:17
JUST A FEW FAILINGS OF THE FLAGSHIP REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD IN THE UK -
FUNDED BY UNLIMITED TAXPAYERS FUNDING WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY BY THE PARLIAMENTARY NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (NAO).
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CREATURE OF THE LABOUR PARTY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CHARITY (21 CHARITY SHOPS) & COMMERCIAL ENTITY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
ACCESS TO UNLIMITED TAXPAYERS GOV'T INCOME
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
PROVIDER OF HOMES TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
18,000+ PROPERTIES
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
£4,000,000,000+ POUNDS OF PROPERTY ASSETS
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE FLAGSHIP REGISTERED LANDLORD IN THE UK
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CHAIRMAN - SENIOR LABOUR PARTY MEMBER
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
CHIEF EXECUTIVE - LABOUR PARTY MEMBER
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
MANY TENANTS COMPLAIN OF ABUSE BY LANDLORDS
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
MANAGEMENT NO RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT LETTERS
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
MANAGEMENT ARE CONFRONTATIONAL
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
MANAGEMENT DO NOT CONSULT
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NON COMMUNICATION BY MANAGEMENT TO TENANTS
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
SHAREHOLDERS ARE NOMINATED BY CHAIRMAN
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NON INDEPENDENT AUDITING OF THE ACOUNTS
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WHOLE LABOUR SECRET PROJECT (HOUSES FOR VOTES FOR NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS) NEEDS TO BE DISMANTLED
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
PRACTICE NEGATIVE DISCRIMINATION
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
ORGAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NON INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ARE PROVIDED WITH EXCELLENT ACCOMODATION
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ARE GIVEN DAMP SLUMS IN DISREPAIR
IS THIS RIGHT?
IS THIS FAIR?
IS THIS REASONABLE?
discriminated tenant
e-mail:
dt99@hotmail.com
DISABILTY/DISABLED MEANS NOUGHT TO SERVITE hOUSING TRUST!
29.04.2006 11:06
"SERVITE HOUSES having obtained an undertaking from Ms Perry in 2000, sought possession of her property under grounds 1 and 2 of the Housing Act 1985.
The matter came before Recorder Forrester QC at Birmingham County Court in February 2004. The court found SERVITE HOUSES' "evidence" to be proved and the grounds established.
The court accepted that Ms Perry suffered from a disability within the meaning of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
She suffered from temporal lobe epilepsy and consequently, had partial seizures.
The court further found that she suffered from a form of paranoid personality.
Ms Perry sought to rely upon the Disability Discrimination Act as an excuse for her behaviour. She stated it would not be reasonable for a possession order to be made, following the decision of the Court of Appeal in Brazier -v- North Devon Homes.
For such an argument to be successful, she needed to establish the following:
She was disabled within the meaning of the Act. It was held she was.
Her behaviour was linked to or caused by her disability.
Provided she satisfied the court on the first two limbs of the test, SERVITE HOUSES' would have needed to justify having issued proceedings despite Ms Perry’s disability.
It was considered that Ms Perry’s disability did not excuse her behaviour towards SERVITE HOUSES' employees and, accordingly, a possession order should be made. The order was suspended, because Ms Perry had lived at her property for sixteen years, there had been a few periods of good behaviour and because, on occasions, she had felt provoked.
Chris Bennett, the Regional Services Manager of 'SERVITE HOUSES' said: 'SERVITE HOUSES' is delighted over the judgement. It has put an end to Ms Perry’s personal comments towards our staff. 'SERVITE HOUSES' is not prepared to accept any anti-social behaviour towards its staff and tenants”. (UNQUOTE)
NOTE:
'SERVITES' HOUSING TRUST' STATE:
"SERVITES' MAIN AIM IS TO SERVE THE PEOPLE".....
ALBEIT AN OLD LADY WHO SUFFERED FROM A DISABILITY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE DISABILTY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1995, INCLUDING TEMPORAL LOBE EPILEPSY AND PARTIAL SEIZURES, WHO UNFORTUNATELY WAS/IS A TENANT OF 'SERVITES' HOUSING TRUST' ....WAS SERVED BY 'SERVTE HOUSING TRUST' WITH PAPERS TO GET OUT OF HER HOME OF 16 YEARS!
THIS OH SO CARING 'SERVITE HOUSING TRUST' WANTED TO THROW HER OUT OF HER HOME!! (NOT NICE PEOPLE TO DO BUISNESS WITH).
AT LEAST WHAT THEY STATE; 'TO SERVE THE PEOPLE' IS TRUE, ALBEIT NOT IN A PRODUCTIVE SENSE. WELL NOT PRODUCTIVE FOR THE PEOPLE THAT IS ...CERTAINLY FINANCIALLY PRODUCTIVE FOR 'SERVITE HOUSING TRUST'.
SUSAN DENIM
e-mail:
SDENI@AOL.COM
AN ODE TO SERVITE HOUSING/HOVELS.....NAME AND SHAME!
30.04.2006 13:29
IN MUCH DISTRESS I CONFESS I LIVE IN A SCUZZY HOVEL, A RESIDENT OF A R.S.L. ----'SERVITE HOUSES' STRAIGHT FROM HELL!
ONE HUNDRED QUID EACH WEEK FOR RENT...I DO BELIEVE THIS TRUST IS BENT...THIS DEN'S NOT FIT FOR ONES LIFE, DAMPNESS DISREPAIR ALL RUN RIFE!
MANY BELIEVE THIS IS A SQUATT...I WISH IT WERE...BUT IT IS NOT! IN A SQUATT WE COULD RELOCATE...'SERVITE HOUSES' STATE: 'YOU JUST WAIT!'
WE HAVE WAITED TEN YEARS NOW...NO RELOCATION...SERVITES' POWER!
THE INCOMPETENCE OF 'SERVITE TRUST' IS QUITE INFAMOUS TO ALL DISGUST... THE WAY 'SERVITE HOUSES' TREAT DISADVANTAGED INDIVIDUALS IS SO....SO DISCRET!
OLD AND FEEBLE, DISABLED TOO...OPEN TO ATTACK...WHEN 'SERVITE HOUSES' WANT POSSESION OF THIER SHACK!
'SERVITE HOUSES' WILL SERVE THE RESIDENT, WITH PAPERS STATING:
"WE ARE INCESSANT, YOUR ASSETS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED.. REGARDING OUR DWELLING WE ARE CONCEDED....SO SLING YOU HOOK, OR WE SHALL EVICT....MISCONTRUE POSSBLY OUR BEST ANTIC!"
COMPLAIN AND JUDGEMENT SHALL BE SERVED...'SERVITE HOUSES' COLD, WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED! BEDEVILMENT ...SHALL BE REINFORCED!
A LAW UNTO THEMSELVES.........I WANT A DIVORCE!
SDENI
IP Logged
susan
e-mail:
sdeni@aol.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ARE CLEARLY EVIL
10.05.2006 13:55
What is more, the Chief Executive at Sevite Houses is the same Chief Executive at Notting Hill Housing Trust - Kate Davies - so it is quite clear that she has migrated her evil confrontational harassment policies against any good tenants that raise legitimate complaints in writing, just as the good tenants raised legitimate queries in writing at Servite Houses. Yet, as you stated, none of them were ever answered or even acknowledged.
At another age Kate Davies would not be let loose at such a responsible job - she would have had to look after her babies.
Now she abandons her kids - spends all her time looking in the mirror - treats good people with arrogance and pride and uses confrontation and harassment in her vanity and hostile behaviour.
What is more, as she joined the Labour Party just to gain promotion - that is the only reason why she joined the party.
She appears to behave as a loose woman?
I would never ever trust her.
None of the tenants trust her.
martin
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST CHARITY SHOPS - THE SCAM!
28.05.2006 19:53
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ Shops are all part of one of the largest and most lucrative of ‘Charitable Trusts’ in this country.
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a Charitable TRUST, then why does it commit UNLAWFUL ACTS in relation to flagrantly breaching trading standards and clear, unambiguous, strict laws of this country, amongst others, breaches of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1979, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Trade Descriptions Act 1968, the Trade Descriptions Act 1972, and the Sale of Goods Act 1979?
The Sale of Goods Act 1979 asserts, amongst other things, that: i) In a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied condition that Goods must correspond to their description [Section 13(1)]; ii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied condition that Goods must be of merchantable quality [Section 14(2)]; iii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business for a particular purpose, there is an implied condition that Goods supplied are reasonably fit for their purpose. [Section 14(3)]
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for IMPLIED TERMS in a Contract.
ALL these laws are some of the many laws that SUPPORT the vulnerable tenants:
i) Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998
ii) Protection from Harassment Act (PHA) 1997
iii) Protection from Eviction Act (PEA) 1977
iv) Criminal Law Act (CLA) 1977
v) Housing Act (HA) 1988
vi) Housing Act (HA) 2004
vii) Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998
Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) – the overriding objective is to enable the Court to deal with cases justly.
BASIC IMPLIED TERMS OF ANY TENANCY:
1. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD NOT TO DEROGATE (deprive) FROM THE GRANT (of the Tenancy)!
There is a STRICT obligation on the landlord not to DEROGATE [or deprive a Tenant] from the GRANT of an Assured Tenancy – the landlord must NOT do anything on the retained property by the Assured Tenant, so as to make the land that has been let to the Assured Tenant less fit for the particular purpose for which the letting was made. Yet, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has broken the tenancy contracts of too many tenants in CIVIL law and in CRIMINAL law. [BREACH OF CONTRACT – DAMAGES ARE IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT!]
2. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD of QUIET ENJOYMENT!
It is UNLAWFUL for the Landlord or his agent or any other person associated with the landlord to unlawfully intimidate or harass the tenant. [If not, immediately go to COURT!]
3. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY FIT FOR HUMAN HABITATION
The property let by the Landlord must be free from DAMP, INFESTATION of any kind, STRUCTURALLY SOUND, not a danger by its SECURITY or SAFETY and the COMMON PARTS MUST BE SAFE, WELL LIT, and any and ALL LIFTS IN GOOD WORKING ORDER, with a working phone in them, in case of break down. Fire appliances and fire safety equipment must be available throughout the property. No asbestos. No live wires (whether this is next to water leaks or not). It would be UNLAWFUL for the landlords to provide heaters that spew out CARBON MONOXIDE poison if th(is)ese fact/s ha(s)ve been notified to the landlords.
If the landlords promise to put the structure or fitted carpets or any essential part of the property in good order and fail to do so, this constitutes an ANICIPATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT! [DAMAGES are then OBTAINABLE!]
Proof of a breach makes the Landlord STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
4. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY THAT IS SUITABLE
If a Tenant suffers from CLAUSTROPHOBIA and/or the fear/stress compounded by or brought on by restricted spaces and/or this medical condition has been expressly asserted to the Landlord, the landlord MUST immediately take the necessary action or suffer the consequences accordingly. It is UNLAWFUL to provide a property that is NOT suitable for the particular tenant.
If a tenant is ‘dumped’ in a damp flat in massive disrepair and as a result, the tenant sustains severe pains and spasms due to the adverse, hostile, deliberate and vindictive acts of his landlords, the tenant accrues a LEGAL RIGHT of action against the landlord.
It becomes UNLAWFUL for the landlord NOT to take the necessary lawful action.
5. PROPERTY MUST BE SAFE
If a tenant suffers as a result of the landlord NOT taking the degree of care that a LAWFUL landlord would take, the landlord will be held STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY committed the following acts:
i) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up the windows of a tenant’s property,
ii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up a tenant’s easement to his garden,
iii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY broken into a tenant’s flat not once - but twice - stealing the tenant’s files and deliberately and UNLAWFULLY causing criminal damage to the tenant’s personal locks and UNLAWFULLY committing break-ins and UNLAWFUL entry into the tenant’s flat. The second time the tenant photographed some of the management of the landlords committing CRIMINAL acts [COMMITTING CRIMES] by two cameras, whereby the management were identified as tooled up with offensive weapons and after following the management back to the staff entrance of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST where other management were waiting to receive the CRIMINAL MANAGEMENT [to try to subvert the evidence?] the tenant thereafter was immediately granted a High Court Injunction and the High Court Judge saw evidence of the RACHMAN methods perpetrated by the EVIL landlord. Next time it was stated IT WILL BE immediate PRISON - even For The CHIEF EXECUTIVE!
The two latest UNLAWFUL matters, the tenants obtained an Injunction against the management and against the Chief Executive [KATE DAVIES] of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who acted in a CRIMINAL way, after she was notified of the first UNLAWFUL Break-In by RECORDED DELIVERY and by FAX. The Injunction asserts that the CHIEF EXECUTIVE [(THE EVIL) KATE DAVIES] can be: i) IMPRISONED, ii) FINED and/or iii) HAVE HER ASSETS SEIZED, if she commits and/or incites through her management, once again: a) the tampering of the Assured Tenant’s electricity [so that the Tenant is obliged ‘to crawl on his hands and knees’ [this appeared in the local newspaper (dated Friday April 28, 2006 – the very week before the LOCAL ELECTIONS on Thursday, 4 May 2006)] in order to get in or get out of his flat], b) the tampering of the tenant’s water supply, and/or c) the theft of the tenant’s own personal or official mail.
How could anyone be so EVIL and so WICKED to vulnerable tenants?
The documentary evidence speaks volumes.
[Did the Chief Executive do the same at SERVITE HOUSES – as Chief Executive?]
[Ex turpi causa non oritur actio - No cause of action may be founded upon an IMMORAL or ILLEGAL act.]
All these matters NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have been known to have breached.
All of these breaches are UNLAWFUL.
As the photograph above indicates, the entrances to some of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops are DANGEROUS and can cause injuries. This is also UNLAWFUL.
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for DEATH and/or PERSONAL INJURY. [Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, Section 2(1)]
Would you really want to sustain a serious injury in order to part with your hard earned money in order to consider ‘throwing away’ your hard earned money to a highly questionable ‘Charitable’ cause?
Do the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops still exist or have they been re-branded? Is this WRONGFUL TRADING? Is this FRAUDULENT TRADING?
It is known of at least 2 (TWO) good, pleasant, sociable, respectable and extremely honourable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who complained in writing to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST about the very DANGEROUS defects in their homes which were the legal responsibility of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST which not only allowed but INCITED breaches of the strict LEGAL DUTY OF CARE to be UNLAWFULLY caused by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and this breach of the lawful duty of care CAUSED the DEATHS of at least 2 (TWO) good, respectable Tenants.
As a result of the NEGLIGENT/RECKLESS action of the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the good respectable tenants were to die [yes, DIE] UNLAWFULLY.
Were they killed?
They certainly DIED.
Both DIED cursing [yes, CURSING. I know, as I have the evidence] NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and its senior management are EVIL beyond measure.
The senior management, acting with gay abandon [as under the authority of GERARD LEMOS (yes, him of 7 BISHAM GARDENS, HIGHGATE) – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Government Race Adviser – Commissioner of the Audit Commission – Commissioner of the Civil Service – Deputy Chairman of the British Council – all nominated by LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER (yes, him of 22 INCHMERY ROAD, CATFORD), ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and before that ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY and before that, head of the NATIONAL UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (NUPE) being in a position of responsibility for Central Government and Local Government employees – now known as UNISON UNION, and then his nominations were automatically appointed by LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR – yes, TOM SAWYER, as the representative of the workers has to be ‘on board’], wafts on with no communication to tenants who are also Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust, where the management act with confrontation, a lack of consultation, hostility, intimidation and harassment, oblivious to the grave concerns and legal consequences that mount on a daily basis.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a LEGAL DUTY to adhere strictly to Trust law. If it does not, any Beneficiary of the Charitable Trust can immediately apply to the Court to initiate an action in Breach of Trust.
What are the objectives of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops?
The landlord, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST owns 19,000+ properties [worth over 4 BILLION (£4,000,000,000) + pounds in the prime locations across London - which are legally owned by the Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust.
YES, but who are all those Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust to whom we refer?
They are the 50,000 [fifty thousand] tenants of ‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) referred to by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as only mere ‘CUSTOMERS’ – no more. It sounds as if the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are referring to some kind of 50,000 [fifty thousand] illiterate, inarticulate ‘VEGETABLES’ who are wholly unaware of their immediate surroundings and who do not have any kind of brain, as if they are those who will never ever take effective action against the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST regarding the severe UNLAWFUL disrepair of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties and/or the confrontational, hostile, aggressive attitude of intimidation and harassment that is demonstrated regularly by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to the good tenants that raise legitimate complaints to the senior management.
Yet NO RESPONSE – AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN!
The only solution is the LEGAL solution - the COURTS.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST treat the tenants as: i) ‘VEGETABLES’, and to anyone who complains in writing, ii) Place a ‘PLANT’ next to the ‘VEGETABLE’. [The Psychological War carried out by Proxy/Others!]
If a good reasonable tenant raises legitimate complaints in writing, immediately, 2 (two) courses of action are initiated by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST:
i) Place the good tenant DELIBERATELY in PURPORTED RENT ARREARS [thank you local authority for your co-operation, do the local authority not deliberately INHIBIT or STOP the Housing Benefit for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST good respectable tenants?
As we all know, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are on first name terms with the Housing Department of the Local Authority and are they also not members of the same political party who support each other?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST supply the properties from their vastly expanding housing stock from unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM which washes through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION; whilst the housing authority of the local authority has the legal duty to house the various housing priority ‘cases’ and the local authority rely on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to provide the properties.
Does not the local authority feel obligated to comply with the requests of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to deliberately inhibit or stop a tenant’s Housing Benefit?
Yes – NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST manage people or ‘customers’ not houses!]; ii) place a ‘TENANT FROM HELL’ [a ‘PLANT’ placed next door to a good tenant.] [Is this not where ‘the CYRENIANS’ comes in particularly useful? – there is a contract that was entered into between ‘the CYRENIANS’ and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST for a considerable sum of money whereby the Charity called ‘THE CYRENIANS’ needs to house people with severe psychological problems, often with severe drug and anti–social tendencies, to place prospective tenants which are placed at the discretion of the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – ideally, as far as the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are concerned, to place unlawfully such tenants next door to the tenant who has raised legitimate complaints in writing? and iii) place the tenant in administrative isolation – then besiege the good tenant with local government and central government imperatives.
Do this – or else!
ISOLATE, DEMONISE and (try to) DISCREDIT?
This is where the astronomically expensive specifically designed NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST computer comes in useful!
This is where the Patrol Officers come in useful.
This is where the Tenant Officers come in useful.
All EVIL tactics done deliberately to intimidate and harass good tenants.
It never fails to amaze the wicked tactics NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can employ!
In the meantime, the management deliberately and UNLAWFULLY switch off the lights in the common parts of so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties of vulnerable tenants!
These are the actions of CRIMINALS.
The new RACHMANISM!
KEEP A DIARY.
Take the right LEGAL steps.
With ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ come ‘THE GHOSTS’.
Who are ‘THE GHOSTS’?
One NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant living in what was, until 4th May 2006, the ‘flagship’ Borough, the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (since 1968 – 38 years) was very recently unlawfully denied his vote. He was informed by specific individuals in authority that he did not live in a particular building. This was a deliberate lie. This was a deliberate deceit.
Yet specific individuals who are employees of the local authority of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham knowingly and unlawfully placed 4 (four) ‘GHOSTS’ in an empty flat which they knew was empty and the flat has only ever housed one adult, and under the postal vote, allowed four votes to be registered and recorded for that particular tiny flat. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham when informed of the reality and of the full facts, acted with surprising intransigence, inertia, complacency and hostility in not being prepared to remove ‘THE GHOSTS’. [Is it true that there is an identification number on the polling card so is it not possible for those in a position of authority to check how an individual voted? Is it still the case that Labour Party membership is an implied term of the employment contract for those employees employed within the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – and the only way for ensuring promotion for the senior officers of ‘the flagship’ Borough?]
If the tenant does not begin as a ‘VEGETABLE’, after careful initial screening by NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Tenant Questionnaire – then NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST place ‘PLANTS’ with psychological problems next to the carefully targeted tenant. Yes, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST house ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ in their properties – where all private landlords house REAL people with REAL feelings and REAL emotions. Indeed, if a good respectable tenant does not start as INCAPACITATED and VULNERABLE – the research department of social policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) together with the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST know how to incapacitate a good respectable tenant to the level of a passive ‘VEGETABLE’. Then they house ‘PLANTS’ and thereafter they seem intent to be determined to house ‘GHOSTS’.
[LSE is the college of London University from where Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair undertook her LLB law degree (before she undertook her Bar exams at Lincoln’s Inn as did TONY BLAIR). She met DERRY IRVINE (the part-time law lecturer) at LSE – who later put her and TONY BLAIR together [as pupils in his law chambers]. In 1994 on the Leader of the LABOUR PARTY, the Barrister, John Smith’s death, DERRY IRVINE arranged, through PETER MANDELSON, for TONY BLAIR to be the leader of the ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP, whom DERRY IRVINE [as Shadow Lord Chancellor, the latter day Cardinal Wolsey to the autocrat dictator, Henry VIII] believed he could control. Now MICHAEL LEVY (11/7/44) of Chase House, Nan Clarks Lane, at Mill Hill, London NW7 4HH believes the same.
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘THE LABOUR PROJECT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘TONY BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHERIE BOOTH/BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHEQUERS – AND ITS TENNIS COURT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of the ‘LABOUR PARTY TREASURY - DONATIONS or is it quasi ‘LOANS’ (with no intermediaries – TONY blackmailed?)?
So very easy for a good political party to be TOTALLY CORRUPTED?
TONY BLAIR nominated MICHAEL LEVY as Envoy in the Middle East (appointed on 14/5/2004).
Yet, is there not a slight question of a Conflict of Interest for him to be nominated as a British Envoy in the Middle East?
Does he have NO training in diplomacy?
Would he be accepted by both parties in the Middle East to broker a dispute, to be seen as Impartial?
Is there not also a question concerning ACCOUNTABILITY?
…and a question of TRANSPARENCY?
Who, after all, is the Official Treasurer of the LABOUR PARTY?
JACK DROMEY (21/9/1948) sits on the NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) of the LABOUR PARTY as (Official Labour Party) TREASURER – the husband of HARRIET HARMAN MP (20/7/1950) of 1 Winterbrook Road, London SE24 9HZ who is a LABOUR PARTY Minister in the Department of Constitutional Affairs (DCA) responsible for Elections and ‘Crown’ (the Illusion/Perception/not the Reality) matters (“How ironic ‘Harry’, seeing as you worked in Brent Law Centre as a solicitor and knowing so well your staunchly Republican views? We even spoke about them, in private…”) ‘under’ CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER (19/11/1951) of 34 Alwyne Road, London N1 2HW from Fountain Court Chambers (TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate) OR is the REAL Treasurer the UNOFFICIAL TREASURER (the qualified accountant – M&G Records etc.) MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY (who has direct access to the PRIME MINISTER with no intermediaries) – Mr LABOUR PARTY LORD ‘CASH-POINT’?]
WHY target VULNERABLE tenants?
To target vulnerable tenants is the most deliberate and evil scheme that any person or entity could activate in order to socially engineer an incapacitated vulnerable class which suffers daily STRESS, ANXIETY and ADVERSE HEALTH.
The LABOUR (PARTY) Government SOCIAL EXCLUSION DEPARTMENT maintains very close contact with NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the LSE and the ODPM Research Department.
SOCIAL EXCLUSION – this is no Freudian slip – this is DELIBERATE.
This is UNCONSCIONABLE!
This is WICKED!
This is VILE!
This is EVIL!
A genuine CARING COMMUNITY would focus on SOCIAL INCLUSION but NOT the LABOUR PARTY.
LABOUR are DEVIOUS
LABOUR are CONFRONTATIONAL
LABOUR are WICKED
LABOUR are EVIL
This was no mistake.
This coming week more vulnerable NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants will be deliberately targeted by the EVIL EMPIRE.
The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST waft off in a drunken or is it a smoked insensibility laughing to their exclusive wine bars in Hammersmith!
The more the Evil from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the more ‘THE (GOOD) HIDDEN HAND’ will knock out the Evil of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
If the EVIL is increased, this WILL result in the END of the Evil Empire.
Is this WISE?
We want BALANCE not POLARISATION in POLITICS!
BUT we will react – to the EVIL that attacks us.
We know who YOU ARE.
We know where YOU LIVE.
We know you are CORRUPT.
We know you DECEIVE.
We know you are out to SUBVERT DEMOCRACY.
We know you are out to SUBVERT the LAW!
So, the legal Beneficiaries of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are known by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST simply as mere ‘Customers’.
These so-called ‘Customers’ are not receiving ‘a service’ but are the unconditional and lawful inheritors of the Wills of the many testators and the Beneficiaries of substantial government largesse.
The pretext as an aim of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Charity is for “Key Workers”.
Why would “Key Workers” be the recipients or the cause of a Charitable Trust? Surely that does not fall within the scope of the 4 (four) classic heads of what does constitute a Charity. [The four heads of Charity being: i) Relief of Poverty, ii) Advancement of Education, iii) Advancement of Religion, iv) Other Purposes Beneficial to the Community, not falling under the other heads.]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) has paid some 24 BILLION [£24,000,000,000] of unaccountable taxpayers money through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION which falls under the responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable JOHN PRESCOTT, and such taxpayers money is then paid into REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) otherwise known as HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs).
The REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) or HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs)
are given their quality rating by the unaccountable and non-transparent entity called the AUDIT COMMISSION which also falls under the responsibility of the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). The responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable John Prescott.
The Department (ODPM) is described in independent authoritative reports as ‘dysfunctional’ and in a way that its management is ‘incompetent, and inefficient’ and acting like a ‘pantomime horse’, with a total ‘lack of accountability and waste.’
WHY?
In order to facilitate the provision of housing for non indigenous citizens who in their gratitude [MAY] vote for the LABOUR PARTY.
But what of the Indigenous citizens?
BLAIR, PRESCOTT, KELLY, SAWYER, SOLEY, RAYNSFORD, LEVY, POWELL (Jonathan, brother of Charles – and Dame Sally Ann (Vickers) Powell (2/10/1955) – ex Cabinet member of Regeneration on the Council of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham of 30 Coverdale Road, W12 8JL one of only 2 LABOUR PARTY Councillors on the National Executive Committee (NEC), wife of Iain Coleman the ex LABOUR PARTY MP for Hammersmith and Fulham), SLAUGHTER, LEMOS, DAVIES, appear to care not a Jot!
The Dysfunctional Dictator appears to care not one Iota.
Just HATE, GREED, HOSTILITY and WAR.
Has George Orwell’s (‘Eric Blair’) ‘1984’ arrived – the imagined date of the elective (evil) dictator (B.LIAR)?
‘The flagship’ Registered Social Landlord/Housing Association is NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
The records of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country] [a bastion and citadel that favours LABOUR PARTY policy] speak volumes, as do the records of ‘the flagship’ Borough in this country. The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that has doggedly supported the LABOUR PARTY [whatever the politics of central government and its OFFICERS continue today to doggedly pursue LABOUR PARTY policy]
Thursday, 4 May 2006 was a turning point across the country – LOCAL ELECTION TIME!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants ACTED decisively!
WHY?
Because
THE CHAIRMAN
THE DIRECTORS
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
THE COMPANY SECRETARY
Did they not all support the LABOUR PARTY?
The LABOUR PARTY showed, by their actions, that they hated ALL indigenous tenants.
The evidence indicates clearly that the LABOUR PARTY despise indigenous tenants.
The LABOUR PARTY despise patriotism. They try to call it “RACISM”.
The LABOUR PARTY wanted to destroy good respectable tenants who are British.
The LABOUR PARTY insist on MULTICULTURISM taking PRIORITY.
The work of the discredited GERARD LEMOS – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – revolved around social engineering - using NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants.
Similarly, the senior OFFICERS of the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM did they not also all support the LABOUR PARTY? The Implied Term of the Employment Contract?
Can the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM not unlawfully INHIBIT or stop the Housing Benefit of tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST when they want to, to the assent of their LABOUR PARTY friends at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, just as a tap of water is turned on so it can be turned off? The only difference is that ‘the water’ is not water but ‘Housing Benefit’, to pay rent for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST flats. Both the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are inter-connected.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can decide the Rent levels - £40 per week or £400 per week for the same studio/bedsit flat?
‘RENT RE-STRUCTURING’ has been imposed on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [if it wants to implement it - in its discretion] by the LABOUR PARTY which is a scam to massively increase rents to market rents to hit Council tenants and Registered Social Landlord (RSL)/Housing Association (HA) tenants.
This was ALL put in place by LABOUR PARTY LORD, CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER?
WHO IS HE?
Is he not TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate who lives in his own private home and his ex flat mate was TONY BLAIR who nominated him as LABOUR PARTY LORD CHANCELLOR – to place him in charge of all laws, all courts, all judges (their appointment, promotion and dismissal), all magistrates (their appointment and dismissal), all law officers (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) and all law staff (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) in the UK?
Oh, and he is in charge of the House of Lords as a Parliamentary Chamber (Legislature), the House of Lords as the highest Court of Appeal in the UK (Judiciary) and perhaps the most senior (and sane?) person in the Cabinet (Executive). With control over ALL three arms of Government! [And not forgetting, in charge of CROWN and CONSTITUTIONAL issues and has responsibility to oversee the three (3) British so-called places of lower taxation or ‘tax havens’ where Cherie (and Leo) have been known to enjoy the beach and the hospitality for good measure – all at taxpayers expense (staying ‘in private’ at Government House)? Is it not also a good place to organise some off-shore Banking, Cherie? Particularly in one of the Channel Islands (where no attempts have been made nor will ever be made to socially engineer any of the people – vulnerable or otherwise)? Why not educate TONY about REAL ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ (before it is too late?)!]
So much for TOTAL control of the Elective Dictatorship.
Similarly, Central Government is closely inter-related with Local Government. Is that not the reason why Jonathan Buchanan was nominated to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the man from the LABOUR Government Intelligence Service [whose duty it is to spy on others – as tenants of the Trust - at the will of the LABOUR Government] was he not ‘planted’ on to the Board of Directors/Trustees as a Director/Trustee?
Is that not why each and every Director/Trustee appointed to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a specific contribution to make in order to oversee the direction of the Evil LABOUR PARTY policies, in order to target good, respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who have raised legitimate complaints to the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
It is clear why there is no response.
It is clear why various agencies support NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST with enthusiasm!
This is all LABOUR PARTY B.LIARISM at its high water mark!
This is the LABOUR PARTY DESTRUCTION OF BRITISH DEMOCRACY at its high water mark!
This is ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP at its high water mark!
Is this not the way of DYSFUNCTIONAL cowards and bullies in Cabinet and in the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Board of Directors/Trustees at its high water mark?
We believe in the rule of LAW.
We believe in DEMOCRACY.
We believe in ACCOUNTABILITY.
We believe in TRANSPARENCY.
We believe that those who govern as ‘the AGENTS’ of us THE PEOPLE or ‘the PRINCIPALS’ – those ‘AGENTS’ can be removed at OUR WILL – and it SHALL be so!
Recently, on 27 April 2006 the Company Secretary of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP, acting on the advice of the Board of Directors/Trustees [are they not ‘the Puppets’ of the LABOUR political party?] attempted to seek the removal of legitimate truthful comments of good respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST posted across the Internet [in many world wide jurisdictions beamed in to the UK] in order to suppress the truth in an effort to try to compromise “freedom of speech” in a democratic and accountable society governed by the rule of law.
Ms IBIJOKE OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY is the Chartered Secretary to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP. She has been the Company Secretary since March 2004.
[The law might be different in Ms IBIJOKE ESO’s country of birth. An elective dictator may rule in her country of birth? She may not know about OUR rule of law? She may not know that “freedom of speech” is uppermost in a democratic and accountable society with transparent government, governed by the rule of law. The administrators in this country are our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’. Our elected representatives and their cohorts are also our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’!]
[Our Prime Minister has a LEGAL DUTY to be our ‘Servant’ of ‘the People’!]
Only one other company has Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ESO and her husband directed. But that company was obliged to be dissolved after just 3 (three) years.
WHY?
The husband of Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) is Mr OLADAPO OLADIPO ESO (1/3/1966).
But why would NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP appoint to the Board of Directors/Trustees a Company Secretary that is vastly inexperienced to run an entity with some 19,000 (nineteen thousand)+ properties worth over £4 BILLION [£4,000,000,000+] receiving unlimited unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM and its unaccountable entities?
Is it not easier to commit a CIVIL wrong [known as a TORT] or worse, a CRIMINAL WRONG [a CRIME] and the entity that commits or the entities that commit such a wrong is deemed to be a CRIMINAL [or CRIMINALS], by employing an inexperienced Company Secretary whose only claim to fame is to direct their own [husband and wife] company that has ended up in dissolution?
Is it reasonable for the major ‘flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in the UK to employ a massively INEXPERIENCED senior officer as COMPANY SECRETARY to run and to delegate the affairs of such a major entity to others?
What about the issues of Corporate Accountability?
What about the issues of Trust Accountability?
What about the issues of Transparency?
What about the issues of Consultation?
What about the issues of Good Communication?
What about the issues of Good Governance?
The evidence indicates NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a vehicle for:
i) Fraud,
ii) Deceit,
iii) Criminal activities,
iv) Unaccountability,
v) Non-Transparency,
vi) Third Class Management,
vii) The Perpetrator of Intimation and Harassment, and
viii) The Perpetrator of Major Breaches of Trust?
Is that why NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is hurriedly trying to re-brand the unaccountable entity?
Why no consultation?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP can not avoid legal liability for its many breaches of Trust.
The Company Secretary appears to come not from Europe but from foreign parts – in line with LABOUR PARTY dogma – to try to divide the British people and for an ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP to take control and to DICTATE?
Was this a wise course of action [for purely political individuals to impose political dogma in breach of Trust]?
Yet, there appear to be very good reasons for such a perverse policy which has nothing to do with good, accountable, transparent, governance, involving the pursuance of upholding LEGAL DUTIES of the vulnerable Beneficiaries. i.e. the 50,000 (fifty thousand) good, respectable tenants.
All the evidence - documentary, oral and real - suggests other reasons:
FRAUD?
GERRYMANDERING?
DECEIT?
CORRUPTION?
BREACHES OF TRUST?
ON AN ASTRONOMICAL SCALE?
THE ENRON OF THE UK?
Is it the case that NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP is nothing but a political sham – to gerrymander political constituencies for the next general election? All the evidence suggests that is the reality, as the perception is given by the so-called “Charity Shopper” who appears to be none other than a member of management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP? Otherwise, why would a person [“Charity Shopper”] incite the breaking of the law on the spurious ground of: “some picky reason that doesn’t really matter that much”?
This makes sense why so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP tenants are living in unlawful conditions and why they have to obtain Injunctions with a power of arrest, against NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST management, and even a power to arrest the Chief Executive of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, Ms KATE DAVIES.
No, “Charity Shopper”, upholding the law really does matter! As does, amongst other things, upholding trading standards, as does not trading with broken steps to trip up potential customers, as does breaking Tort law, as does breaking Contract law, as does breaking Consumer Protection and Fair Trading law, as does breaking Housing law, as does breaking Criminal law, as does breaking Charity law, as does breaking the very strict law of Trusts.
Try saying that to any NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant that upholding the law does not really matter, as NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country - with over £400 MILLION (£400,000,000+) of assets in cash lying dormant in reserve – why? - and the majority of the properties of the Trust are in a disgusting and UNLAWFUL condition not fit for human habitation, many properties are damp to the core and infested with vermin and UNLAWFULLY not fit to live in, with lights DELIBERATELY extinguished in the common parts of many of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties.
This fact is supported with overwhelming documentary evidence and witness statements from furious complaining tenants who are Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust that have been languishing in limbo. Too many tenants have made legitimate complaints to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and those incompetent and third rate senior management who act unlawfully to good respectable tenants do not even respond with an acknowledgement letter, whilst the poor tenants suffer and fester in slum properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that are unlawfully, yes, UNLAWFULLY in disrepair – the evidence is out there to be seen]. Stress, anxiety, and bad health of the good tenants deteriorate whilst the Personal Injury claim of the good respectable tenant increases in severity.
The next time a tenant - of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - is KILLED by a defective NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST heater after numerous complaints to the senior management - the response – nothing – remember, such deaths have happened before. This indicates a complicit senior management who act UNLAWFULLY. Therefore, think very carefully “Charity Shopper” or you too will be supporting and even inciting the growth of the new [Peter] RACHMAN or slum landlord [from NOTTING HILL] – who eventually ended up in front of the civil courts and the criminal courts [and he was sent down with a long custodial sentence - his name has become a byword for slums, lies and deception – not unlike the usual methods of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST]!
Take note, LABOUR PARTY DICTATORS THAT ARE THE ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP in the UK. The LABOUR PARTY DICTATIRS have been working on social engineering, as GERARD LEMOS [the ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST] who was assisted by the research undertaken by the LSE, which appears to go hand in hand with that conducted by the ex LABOUR PARTY Councillor of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM COUNCIL and later LABOUR PARTY Housing Minister NIC RAYNSFORD who has undertaken research on these issues, as has the ODPM. They know that the evidence is a MAJOR SCANDAL – it would discredit a banana (ELECTIVE) DICTATORSHIP (even the fourth richest country in the world)!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has become a byword for living in a slum supported by confrontational landlords who do not care to consult nor communicate as reasonable landlords.
The attempt to enslave us all under the elective dictatorship of the deeply flawed COMMUNIST inspired ideology of LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, PETER REDMAN, GERARD LEMOS, KATE DAVIES, NIC RAYNSFORD and their cohorts, as epitomised and underpinned by the blood RED flag and blood RED livery that abounds in, on and around ‘the flagship’ London Borough of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM which these past 38 [thirty eight] years [from 1968] has trampled over all our hard won freedoms, liberties and rights, destroyed by every hard left thinking LABOUR government, which was enthusiastically endorsed by ‘the flagship’ London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST was always carrying out Central Government diktat or more correctly the diktat regulated from GROVE HOUSE, 27 HAMMERSMITH GROVE, LONDON W6 OLJ, the REAL ‘SECRET’ Government entity, tucked discreetly away in the very heart of leafy Hammersmith [how DEVIOUSLY CLEVER]!
It appears that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is totally immune from prosecution?
Why was there no prosecution by the DPP when the 45+ exclusive properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that were held in Trust as part of the housing stock that were earmarked for vulnerable tenants were misappropriated and no prosecution was ever launched by the DPP for FRAUD?
WHY?
Who is the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) – head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) – the person responsible for determining which individual or entity to prosecute in this country [by the two basic tests:
i) the Evidential Test, and
ii) the Public Interest Test]?
Is the DPP not KEN MACDONALD?
Was KEN MACDONALD not the senior tenant of Matrix Chambers in Gray’s Inn, a very good friend of Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair?
Did not CHERIE BOOTH a.k.a. CHERIE BLAIR, recommend KEN MACDONALD to TONY B.LIAR as DPP? [Does not pillow talk work wonders?]
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST certainly has friends with platforms in the highest echelons – LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, LABOUR LORD, CLIVE SOLEY, LABOUR LORD, CHARLES FALCONER, LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR.
Just look at the composition of the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
There lies the clear evidence.
Ask again, what exactly is a Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ISO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY doing advising the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as Company Secretary?
On Thursday 4 May 2006, the blood RED flag and all it stands for FELL over the Town Halls of: i) Hammersmith, and ii) Fulham, in the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – ‘the flagship’ Borough in the UK.
Is it not an implied term of the contract of employment of all employees of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that all prospective employees of the London Borough are members of one extremely (symbolically RED) leaning political party?
Yet, make no mistake, we the tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are not stupid.
We do not want a hard LEFT wing government.
We do not want a hard RIGHT wing government.
We the vulnerable tenants want a BALANCE!
We want the door OPEN!
We want complete CONSULTATION.
Otherwise LABOUR – without the SUPPORT of vulnerable tenants - is consigned to the WILDERNESS!!!
WE WILL DECIDE WHAT WILL HAPPEN!!!
As from Thursday 4 May 2006, ‘the flagship’ London Borough of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham is comprised of 33 CONSERVATIVE Councillors and 13 LABOUR Councillors.
The Labour Party has been rocked to its core. The ‘flagship’ Borough has FALLEN!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, NEIL KINNOCK predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, CLIVE SOLEY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, MICHAEL LEVY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, NIC RAYNSFORD predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR predicted!
[There is ONE missing… the ‘4’ + the ‘3’!]
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS ALL thought.
Yet – all of them – were warned by ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that TOM SAWYER would be discredited.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that GERARD LEMOS would be discredited – so he was! He ran off to the People’s Republic of China with his ‘Little Red (COMMUNIST) Book’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that the flawed DYSFUNCTIONAL ex COMMUNIST CHARLES CLARKE and PATRICIA HEWITT would have to go – ‘BLACK WEDNESDAY’ proved ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ right!
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied ‘the FLAGSHIP’ London Borough would FALL – it DID!
BUT the stupid fools at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST would not LISTEN or ACT to SUPPORT vulnerable tenants or ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.
DISRESPECT vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ at your PERIL.
Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ can SUPPORT any POLITICAL PARTY.
Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ SUPPORTS VULNERABLE tenants.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a choice.
IT LEADS…! Do you remember those words - KD? They will come back to haunt you for EVER!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST will DEFINE ITS POSITION and thereby seal its FATE!
FOR GOOD or FOR EVIL???
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST unreasonably PLAYS with the lives of VULNERABLE tenants and treats VULNERABLE lives as mere ‘VEGETABLES’ – to try to DESTROY – ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ will employ its powerful two-edged sword…
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ never threatens.
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ WILL PROMISE and DELIVER on that promise...
john
e-mail:
john_smith_mail@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST CHARITY SHOPS - THE GREAT DECEIT?
29.05.2006 16:54
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ Shops are all part of one of the largest and most lucrative of ‘Charitable Trusts’ in this country.
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a Charitable TRUST, then why does it commit UNLAWFUL ACTS in relation to flagrantly breaching trading standards and clear, unambiguous, strict laws of this country, amongst others, breaches of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1979, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Trade Descriptions Act 1968, the Trade Descriptions Act 1972, and the Sale of Goods Act 1979?
The Sale of Goods Act 1979 asserts, amongst other things, that: i) In a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied condition that Goods must correspond to their description [Section 13(1)]; ii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied condition that Goods must be of merchantable quality [Section 14(2)]; iii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business for a particular purpose, there is an implied condition that Goods supplied are reasonably fit for their purpose. [Section 14(3)]
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for IMPLIED TERMS in a Contract.
ALL these laws are some of the many laws that SUPPORT the vulnerable tenants:
i) Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998
ii) Protection from Harassment Act (PHA) 1997
iii) Protection from Eviction Act (PEA) 1977
iv) Criminal Law Act (CLA) 1977
v) Housing Act (HA) 1988
vi) Housing Act (HA) 2004
vii) Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998
Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) – the overriding objective is to enable the Court to deal with cases justly.
BASIC IMPLIED TERMS OF ANY TENANCY:
1. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD NOT TO DEROGATE (deprive) FROM THE GRANT (of the Tenancy)!
There is a STRICT obligation on the landlord not to DEROGATE [or deprive a Tenant] from the GRANT of an Assured Tenancy – the landlord must NOT do anything on the retained property by the Assured Tenant, so as to make the land that has been let to the Assured Tenant less fit for the particular purpose for which the letting was made. Yet, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has broken the tenancy contracts of too many tenants in CIVIL law and in CRIMINAL law. [BREACH OF CONTRACT – DAMAGES ARE IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT!]
2. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD of QUIET ENJOYMENT!
It is UNLAWFUL for the Landlord or his agent or any other person associated with the landlord to unlawfully intimidate or harass the tenant. [If not, immediately go to COURT!]
3. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY FIT FOR HUMAN HABITATION
The property let by the Landlord must be free from DAMP, INFESTATION of any kind, STRUCTURALLY SOUND, not a danger by its SECURITY or SAFETY and the COMMON PARTS MUST BE SAFE, WELL LIT, and any and ALL LIFTS IN GOOD WORKING ORDER, with a working phone in them, in case of break down. Fire appliances and fire safety equipment must be available throughout the property. No asbestos. No live wires (whether this is next to water leaks or not). It would be UNLAWFUL for the landlords to provide heaters that spew out CARBON MONOXIDE poison if th(is)ese fact/s ha(s)ve been notified to the landlords.
If the landlords promise to put the structure or fitted carpets or any essential part of the property in good order and fail to do so, this constitutes an ANICIPATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT! [DAMAGES are then OBTAINABLE!]
Proof of a breach makes the Landlord STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
4. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY THAT IS SUITABLE
If a Tenant suffers from CLAUSTROPHOBIA and/or the fear/stress compounded by or brought on by restricted spaces and/or this medical condition has been expressly asserted to the Landlord, the landlord MUST immediately take the necessary action or suffer the consequences accordingly. It is UNLAWFUL to provide a property that is NOT suitable for the particular tenant.
If a tenant is ‘dumped’ in a damp flat in massive disrepair and as a result, the tenant sustains severe pains and spasms due to the adverse, hostile, deliberate and vindictive acts of his landlords, the tenant accrues a LEGAL RIGHT of action against the landlord.
It becomes UNLAWFUL for the landlord NOT to take the necessary lawful action.
5. PROPERTY MUST BE SAFE
If a tenant suffers as a result of the landlord NOT taking the degree of care that a LAWFUL landlord would take, the landlord will be held STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY committed the following acts:
i) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up the windows of a tenant’s property,
ii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up a tenant’s easement to his garden,
iii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY broken into a tenant’s flat not once - but twice - stealing the tenant’s files and deliberately and UNLAWFULLY causing criminal damage to the tenant’s personal locks and UNLAWFULLY committing break-ins and UNLAWFUL entry into the tenant’s flat. The second time the tenant photographed some of the management of the landlords committing CRIMINAL acts [COMMITTING CRIMES] by two cameras, whereby the management were identified as tooled up with offensive weapons and after following the management back to the staff entrance of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST where other management were waiting to receive the CRIMINAL MANAGEMENT [to try to subvert the evidence?] the tenant thereafter was immediately granted a High Court Injunction and the High Court Judge saw evidence of the RACHMAN methods perpetrated by the EVIL landlord. Next time it was stated IT WILL BE immediate PRISON - even For The CHIEF EXECUTIVE!
The two latest UNLAWFUL matters, the tenants obtained an Injunction against the management and against the Chief Executive [KATE DAVIES] of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who acted in a CRIMINAL way, after she was notified of the first UNLAWFUL Break-In by RECORDED DELIVERY and by FAX. The Injunction asserts that the CHIEF EXECUTIVE [(THE EVIL) KATE DAVIES] can be: i) IMPRISONED, ii) FINED and/or iii) HAVE HER ASSETS SEIZED, if she commits and/or incites through her management, once again: a) the tampering of the Assured Tenant’s electricity [so that the Tenant is obliged ‘to crawl on his hands and knees’ [this appeared in the local newspaper (dated Friday April 28, 2006 – the very week before the LOCAL ELECTIONS on Thursday, 4 May 2006)] in order to get in or get out of his flat], b) the tampering of the tenant’s water supply, and/or c) the theft of the tenant’s own personal or official mail.
How could anyone be so EVIL and so WICKED to vulnerable tenants?
The documentary evidence speaks volumes.
[Did the Chief Executive do the same at SERVITE HOUSES – as Chief Executive?]
[Ex turpi causa non oritur actio - No cause of action may be founded upon an IMMORAL or ILLEGAL act.]
All these matters NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have been known to have breached.
All of these breaches are UNLAWFUL.
As the photograph above indicates, the entrances to some of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops are DANGEROUS and can cause injuries. This is also UNLAWFUL.
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for DEATH and/or PERSONAL INJURY. [Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, Section 2(1)]
Would you really want to sustain a serious injury in order to part with your hard earned money in order to consider ‘throwing away’ your hard earned money to a highly questionable ‘Charitable’ cause?
Do the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops still exist or have they been re-branded? Is this WRONGFUL TRADING? Is this FRAUDULENT TRADING?
It is known of at least 2 (TWO) good, pleasant, sociable, respectable and extremely honourable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who complained in writing to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST about the very DANGEROUS defects in their homes which were the legal responsibility of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST which not only allowed but INCITED breaches of the strict LEGAL DUTY OF CARE to be UNLAWFULLY caused by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and this breach of the lawful duty of care CAUSED the DEATHS of at least 2 (TWO) good, respectable Tenants.
As a result of the NEGLIGENT/RECKLESS action of the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the good respectable tenants were to die [yes, DIE] UNLAWFULLY.
Were they killed?
They certainly DIED.
Both DIED cursing [yes, CURSING. I know, as I have the evidence] NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and its senior management are EVIL beyond measure.
The senior management, acting with gay abandon [as under the authority of GERARD LEMOS (yes, him of 7 BISHAM GARDENS, HIGHGATE) – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Government Race Adviser – Commissioner of the Audit Commission – Commissioner of the Civil Service – Deputy Chairman of the British Council – all nominated by LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER (yes, him of 22 INCHMERY ROAD, CATFORD), ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and before that ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY and before that, head of the NATIONAL UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (NUPE) being in a position of responsibility for Central Government and Local Government employees – now known as UNISON UNION, and then his nominations were automatically appointed by LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR – yes, TOM SAWYER, as the representative of the workers has to be ‘on board’], wafts on with no communication to tenants who are also Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust, where the management act with confrontation, a lack of consultation, hostility, intimidation and harassment, oblivious to the grave concerns and legal consequences that mount on a daily basis.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a LEGAL DUTY to adhere strictly to Trust law. If it does not, any Beneficiary of the Charitable Trust can immediately apply to the Court to initiate an action in Breach of Trust.
What are the objectives of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops?
The landlord, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST owns 19,000+ properties [worth over 4 BILLION (£4,000,000,000) + pounds in the prime locations across London - which are legally owned by the Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust.
YES, but who are all those Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust to whom we refer?
They are the 50,000 [fifty thousand] tenants of ‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) referred to by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as only mere ‘CUSTOMERS’ – no more. It sounds as if the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are referring to some kind of 50,000 [fifty thousand] illiterate, inarticulate ‘VEGETABLES’ who are wholly unaware of their immediate surroundings and who do not have any kind of brain, as if they are those who will never ever take effective action against the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST regarding the severe UNLAWFUL disrepair of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties and/or the confrontational, hostile, aggressive attitude of intimidation and harassment that is demonstrated regularly by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to the good tenants that raise legitimate complaints to the senior management.
Yet NO RESPONSE – AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN!
The only solution is the LEGAL solution - the COURTS.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST treat the tenants as: i) ‘VEGETABLES’, and to anyone who complains in writing, ii) Place a ‘PLANT’ next to the ‘VEGETABLE’. [The Psychological War carried out by Proxy/Others!]
If a good reasonable tenant raises legitimate complaints in writing, immediately, 2 (two) courses of action are initiated by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST:
i) Place the good tenant DELIBERATELY in PURPORTED RENT ARREARS [thank you local authority for your co-operation, do the local authority not deliberately INHIBIT or STOP the Housing Benefit for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST good respectable tenants?
As we all know, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are on first name terms with the Housing Department of the Local Authority and are they also not members of the same political party who support each other?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST supply the properties from their vastly expanding housing stock from unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM which washes through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION; whilst the housing authority of the local authority has the legal duty to house the various housing priority ‘cases’ and the local authority rely on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to provide the properties.
Does not the local authority feel obligated to comply with the requests of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to deliberately inhibit or stop a tenant’s Housing Benefit?
Yes – NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST manage people or ‘customers’ not houses!]; ii) place a ‘TENANT FROM HELL’ [a ‘PLANT’ placed next door to a good tenant.] [Is this not where ‘the CYRENIANS’ comes in particularly useful? – there is a contract that was entered into between ‘the CYRENIANS’ and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST for a considerable sum of money whereby the Charity called ‘THE CYRENIANS’ needs to house people with severe psychological problems, often with severe drug and anti–social tendencies, to place prospective tenants which are placed at the discretion of the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – ideally, as far as the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are concerned, to place unlawfully such tenants next door to the tenant who has raised legitimate complaints in writing? and iii) place the tenant in administrative isolation – then besiege the good tenant with local government and central government imperatives.
Do this – or else!
ISOLATE, DEMONISE and (try to) DISCREDIT?
This is where the astronomically expensive specifically designed NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST computer comes in useful!
This is where the Patrol Officers come in useful.
This is where the Tenant Officers come in useful.
All EVIL tactics done deliberately to intimidate and harass good tenants.
It never fails to amaze the wicked tactics NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can employ!
In the meantime, the management deliberately and UNLAWFULLY switch off the lights in the common parts of so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties of vulnerable tenants!
These are the actions of CRIMINALS.
The new RACHMANISM!
KEEP A DIARY.
Take the right LEGAL steps.
With ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ come ‘THE GHOSTS’.
Who are ‘THE GHOSTS’?
One NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant living in what was, until 4th May 2006, the ‘flagship’ Borough, the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (since 1968 – 38 years) was very recently unlawfully denied his vote. He was informed by specific individuals in authority that he did not live in a particular building. This was a deliberate lie. This was a deliberate deceit.
Yet specific individuals who are employees of the local authority of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham knowingly and unlawfully placed 4 (four) ‘GHOSTS’ in an empty flat which they knew was empty and the flat has only ever housed one adult, and under the postal vote, allowed four votes to be registered and recorded for that particular tiny flat. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham when informed of the reality and of the full facts, acted with surprising intransigence, inertia, complacency and hostility in not being prepared to remove ‘THE GHOSTS’. [Is it true that there is an identification number on the polling card so is it not possible for those in a position of authority to check how an individual voted? Is it still the case that Labour Party membership is an implied term of the employment contract for those employees employed within the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – and the only way for ensuring promotion for the senior officers of ‘the flagship’ Borough?]
If the tenant does not begin as a ‘VEGETABLE’, after careful initial screening by NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Tenant Questionnaire – then NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST place ‘PLANTS’ with psychological problems next to the carefully targeted tenant. Yes, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST house ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ in their properties – where all private landlords house REAL people with REAL feelings and REAL emotions. Indeed, if a good respectable tenant does not start as INCAPACITATED and VULNERABLE – the research department of social policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) together with the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST know how to incapacitate a good respectable tenant to the level of a passive ‘VEGETABLE’. Then they house ‘PLANTS’ and thereafter they seem intent to be determined to house ‘GHOSTS’.
[LSE is the college of London University from where Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair undertook her LLB law degree (before she undertook her Bar exams at Lincoln’s Inn as did TONY BLAIR). She met DERRY IRVINE (the part-time law lecturer) at LSE – who later put her and TONY BLAIR together [as pupils in his law chambers]. In 1994 on the Leader of the LABOUR PARTY, the Barrister, John Smith’s death, DERRY IRVINE arranged, through PETER MANDELSON, for TONY BLAIR to be the leader of the ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP, whom DERRY IRVINE [as Shadow Lord Chancellor, the latter day Cardinal Wolsey to the autocrat dictator, Henry VIII] believed he could control. Now MICHAEL LEVY (11/7/44) of Chase House, Nan Clarks Lane, at Mill Hill, London NW7 4HH believes the same.
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘THE LABOUR PROJECT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘TONY BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHERIE BOOTH/BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHEQUERS – AND ITS TENNIS COURT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of the ‘LABOUR PARTY TREASURY - DONATIONS or is it quasi ‘LOANS’ (with no intermediaries – TONY blackmailed?)?
So very easy for a good political party to be TOTALLY CORRUPTED?
TONY BLAIR nominated MICHAEL LEVY as Envoy in the Middle East (appointed on 14/5/2004).
Yet, is there not a slight question of a Conflict of Interest for him to be nominated as a British Envoy in the Middle East?
Does he have NO training in diplomacy?
Would he be accepted by both parties in the Middle East to broker a dispute, to be seen as Impartial?
Is there not also a question concerning ACCOUNTABILITY?
…and a question of TRANSPARENCY?
Who, after all, is the Official Treasurer of the LABOUR PARTY?
JACK DROMEY (21/9/1948) sits on the NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) of the LABOUR PARTY as (Official Labour Party) TREASURER – the husband of HARRIET HARMAN MP (20/7/1950) of 1 Winterbrook Road, London SE24 9HZ who is a LABOUR PARTY Minister in the Department of Constitutional Affairs (DCA) responsible for Elections and ‘Crown’ (the Illusion/Perception/not the Reality) matters (“How ironic ‘Harry’, seeing as you worked in Brent Law Centre as a solicitor and knowing so well your staunchly Republican views? We even spoke about them, in private…”) ‘under’ CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER (19/11/1951) of 34 Alwyne Road, London N1 2HW from Fountain Court Chambers (TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate) OR is the REAL Treasurer the UNOFFICIAL TREASURER (the qualified accountant – M&G Records etc.) MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY (who has direct access to the PRIME MINISTER with no intermediaries) – Mr LABOUR PARTY LORD ‘CASH-POINT’?]
WHY target VULNERABLE tenants?
To target vulnerable tenants is the most deliberate and evil scheme that any person or entity could activate in order to socially engineer an incapacitated vulnerable class which suffers daily STRESS, ANXIETY and ADVERSE HEALTH.
The LABOUR (PARTY) Government SOCIAL EXCLUSION DEPARTMENT maintains very close contact with NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the LSE and the ODPM Research Department.
SOCIAL EXCLUSION – this is no Freudian slip – this is DELIBERATE.
This is UNCONSCIONABLE!
This is WICKED!
This is VILE!
This is EVIL!
A genuine CARING COMMUNITY would focus on SOCIAL INCLUSION but NOT the LABOUR PARTY.
LABOUR are DEVIOUS
LABOUR are CONFRONTATIONAL
LABOUR are WICKED
LABOUR are EVIL
This was no mistake.
This coming week more vulnerable NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants will be deliberately targeted by the EVIL EMPIRE.
The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST waft off in a drunken or is it a smoked insensibility laughing to their exclusive wine bars in Hammersmith!
The more the Evil from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the more ‘THE (GOOD) HIDDEN HAND’ will knock out the Evil of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
If the EVIL is increased, this WILL result in the END of the Evil Empire.
Is this WISE?
We want BALANCE not POLARISATION in POLITICS!
BUT we will react – to the EVIL that attacks us.
We know who YOU ARE.
We know where YOU LIVE.
We know you are CORRUPT.
We know you DECEIVE.
We know you are out to SUBVERT DEMOCRACY.
We know you are out to SUBVERT the LAW!
So, the legal Beneficiaries of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are known by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST simply as mere ‘Customers’.
These so-called ‘Customers’ are not receiving ‘a service’ but are the unconditional and lawful inheritors of the Wills of the many testators and the Beneficiaries of substantial government largesse.
The pretext as an aim of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Charity is for “Key Workers”.
Why would “Key Workers” be the recipients or the cause of a Charitable Trust? Surely that does not fall within the scope of the 4 (four) classic heads of what does constitute a Charity. [The four heads of Charity being: i) Relief of Poverty, ii) Advancement of Education, iii) Advancement of Religion, iv) Other Purposes Beneficial to the Community, not falling under the other heads.]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) has paid some 24 BILLION [£24,000,000,000] of unaccountable taxpayers money through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION which falls under the responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable JOHN PRESCOTT, and such taxpayers money is then paid into REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) otherwise known as HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs).
The REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) or HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs)
are given their quality rating by the unaccountable and non-transparent entity called the AUDIT COMMISSION which also falls under the responsibility of the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). The responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable John Prescott.
The Department (ODPM) is described in independent authoritative reports as ‘dysfunctional’ and in a way that its management is ‘incompetent, and inefficient’ and acting like a ‘pantomime horse’, with a total ‘lack of accountability and waste.’
WHY?
In order to facilitate the provision of housing for non indigenous citizens who in their gratitude [MAY] vote for the LABOUR PARTY.
But what of the Indigenous citizens?
BLAIR, PRESCOTT, KELLY, SAWYER, SOLEY, RAYNSFORD, LEVY, POWELL (Jonathan, brother of Charles – and Dame Sally Ann (Vickers) Powell (2/10/1955) – ex Cabinet member of Regeneration on the Council of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham of 30 Coverdale Road, W12 8JL one of only 2 LABOUR PARTY Councillors on the National Executive Committee (NEC), wife of Iain Coleman the ex LABOUR PARTY MP for Hammersmith and Fulham), SLAUGHTER, LEMOS, DAVIES, appear to care not a Jot!
The Dysfunctional Dictator appears to care not one Iota.
Just HATE, GREED, HOSTILITY and WAR.
Has George Orwell’s (‘Eric Blair’) ‘1984’ arrived – the imagined date of the elective (evil) dictator (B.LIAR)?
‘The flagship’ Registered Social Landlord/Housing Association is NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
The records of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country] [a bastion and citadel that favours LABOUR PARTY policy] speak volumes, as do the records of ‘the flagship’ Borough in this country. The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that has doggedly supported the LABOUR PARTY [whatever the politics of central government and its OFFICERS continue today to doggedly pursue LABOUR PARTY policy]
Thursday, 4 May 2006 was a turning point across the country – LOCAL ELECTION TIME!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants ACTED decisively!
WHY?
Because
THE CHAIRMAN
THE DIRECTORS
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
THE COMPANY SECRETARY
Did they not all support the LABOUR PARTY?
The LABOUR PARTY showed, by their actions, that they hated ALL indigenous tenants.
The evidence indicates clearly that the LABOUR PARTY despise indigenous tenants.
The LABOUR PARTY despise patriotism. They try to call it “RACISM”.
The LABOUR PARTY wanted to destroy good respectable tenants who are British.
The LABOUR PARTY insist on MULTICULTURISM taking PRIORITY.
The work of the discredited GERARD LEMOS – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – revolved around social engineering - using NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants.
Similarly, the senior OFFICERS of the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM did they not also all support the LABOUR PARTY? The Implied Term of the Employment Contract?
Can the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM not unlawfully INHIBIT or stop the Housing Benefit of tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST when they want to, to the assent of their LABOUR PARTY friends at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, just as a tap of water is turned on so it can be turned off? The only difference is that ‘the water’ is not water but ‘Housing Benefit’, to pay rent for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST flats. Both the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are inter-connected.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can decide the Rent levels - £40 per week or £400 per week for the same studio/bedsit flat?
‘RENT RE-STRUCTURING’ has been imposed on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [if it wants to implement it - in its discretion] by the LABOUR PARTY which is a scam to massively increase rents to market rents to hit Council tenants and Registered Social Landlord (RSL)/Housing Association (HA) tenants.
This was ALL put in place by LABOUR PARTY LORD, CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER?
WHO IS HE?
Is he not TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate who lives in his own private home and his ex flat mate was TONY BLAIR who nominated him as LABOUR PARTY LORD CHANCELLOR – to place him in charge of all laws, all courts, all judges (their appointment, promotion and dismissal), all magistrates (their appointment and dismissal), all law officers (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) and all law staff (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) in the UK?
Oh, and he is in charge of the House of Lords as a Parliamentary Chamber (Legislature), the House of Lords as the highest Court of Appeal in the UK (Judiciary) and perhaps the most senior (and sane?) person in the Cabinet (Executive). With control over ALL three arms of Government! [And not forgetting, in charge of CROWN and CONSTITUTIONAL issues and has responsibility to oversee the three (3) British so-called places of lower taxation or ‘tax havens’ where Cherie (and Leo) have been known to enjoy the beach and the hospitality for good measure – all at taxpayers expense (staying ‘in private’ at Government House)? Is it not also a good place to organise some off-shore Banking, Cherie? Particularly in one of the Channel Islands (where no attempts have been made nor will ever be made to socially engineer any of the people – vulnerable or otherwise)? Why not educate TONY about REAL ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ (before it is too late?)!]
So much for TOTAL control of the Elective Dictatorship.
Similarly, Central Government is closely inter-related with Local Government. Is that not the reason why Jonathan Buchanan was nominated to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the man from the LABOUR Government Intelligence Service [whose duty it is to spy on others – as tenants of the Trust - at the will of the LABOUR Government] was he not ‘planted’ on to the Board of Directors/Trustees as a Director/Trustee?
Is that not why each and every Director/Trustee appointed to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a specific contribution to make in order to oversee the direction of the Evil LABOUR PARTY policies, in order to target good, respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who have raised legitimate complaints to the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
It is clear why there is no response.
It is clear why various agencies support NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST with enthusiasm!
This is all LABOUR PARTY B.LIARISM at its high water mark!
This is the LABOUR PARTY DESTRUCTION OF BRITISH DEMOCRACY at its high water mark!
This is ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP at its high water mark!
Is this not the way of DYSFUNCTIONAL cowards and bullies in Cabinet and in the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Board of Directors/Trustees at its high water mark?
We believe in the rule of LAW.
We believe in DEMOCRACY.
We believe in ACCOUNTABILITY.
We believe in TRANSPARENCY.
We believe that those who govern as ‘the AGENTS’ of us THE PEOPLE or ‘the PRINCIPALS’ – those ‘AGENTS’ can be removed at OUR WILL – and it SHALL be so!
Recently, on 27 April 2006 the Company Secretary of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP, acting on the advice of the Board of Directors/Trustees [are they not ‘the Puppets’ of the LABOUR political party?] attempted to seek the removal of legitimate truthful comments of good respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST posted across the Internet [in many world wide jurisdictions beamed in to the UK] in order to suppress the truth in an effort to try to compromise “freedom of speech” in a democratic and accountable society governed by the rule of law.
Ms IBIJOKE OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY is the Chartered Secretary to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP. She has been the Company Secretary since March 2004.
[The law might be different in Ms IBIJOKE ESO’s country of birth. An elective dictator may rule in her country of birth? She may not know about OUR rule of law? She may not know that “freedom of speech” is uppermost in a democratic and accountable society with transparent government, governed by the rule of law. The administrators in this country are our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’. Our elected representatives and their cohorts are also our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’!]
[Our Prime Minister has a LEGAL DUTY to be our ‘Servant’ of ‘the People’!]
Only one other company has Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ESO and her husband directed. But that company was obliged to be dissolved after just 3 (three) years.
WHY?
The husband of Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) is Mr OLADAPO OLADIPO ESO (1/3/1966).
But why would NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP appoint to the Board of Directors/Trustees a Company Secretary that is vastly inexperienced to run an entity with some 19,000 (nineteen thousand)+ properties worth over £4 BILLION [£4,000,000,000+] receiving unlimited unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM and its unaccountable entities?
Is it not easier to commit a CIVIL wrong [known as a TORT] or worse, a CRIMINAL WRONG [a CRIME] and the entity that commits or the entities that commit such a wrong is deemed to be a CRIMINAL [or CRIMINALS], by employing an inexperienced Company Secretary whose only claim to fame is to direct their own [husband and wife] company that has ended up in dissolution?
Is it reasonable for the major ‘flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in the UK to employ a massively INEXPERIENCED senior officer as COMPANY SECRETARY to run and to delegate the affairs of such a major entity to others?
What about the issues of Corporate Accountability?
What about the issues of Trust Accountability?
What about the issues of Transparency?
What about the issues of Consultation?
What about the issues of Good Communication?
What about the issues of Good Governance?
The evidence indicates NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a vehicle for:
i) Fraud,
ii) Deceit,
iii) Criminal activities,
iv) Unaccountability,
v) Non-Transparency,
vi) Third Class Management,
vii) The Perpetrator of Intimation and Harassment, and
viii) The Perpetrator of Major Breaches of Trust?
Is that why NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is hurriedly trying to re-brand the unaccountable entity?
Why no consultation?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP can not avoid legal liability for its many breaches of Trust.
The Company Secretary appears to come not from Europe but from foreign parts – in line with LABOUR PARTY dogma – to try to divide the British people and for an ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP to take control and to DICTATE?
Was this a wise course of action [for purely political individuals to impose political dogma in breach of Trust]?
Yet, there appear to be very good reasons for such a perverse policy which has nothing to do with good, accountable, transparent, governance, involving the pursuance of upholding LEGAL DUTIES of the vulnerable Beneficiaries. i.e. the 50,000 (fifty thousand) good, respectable tenants.
All the evidence - documentary, oral and real - suggests other reasons:
FRAUD?
GERRYMANDERING?
DECEIT?
CORRUPTION?
BREACHES OF TRUST?
ON AN ASTRONOMICAL SCALE?
THE ENRON OF THE UK?
Is it the case that NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP is nothing but a political sham – to gerrymander political constituencies for the next general election? All the evidence suggests that is the reality, as the perception is given by the so-called “Charity Shopper” who appears to be none other than a member of management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP? Otherwise, why would a person [“Charity Shopper”] incite the breaking of the law on the spurious ground of: “some picky reason that doesn’t really matter that much”?
This makes sense why so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP tenants are living in unlawful conditions and why they have to obtain Injunctions with a power of arrest, against NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST management, and even a power to arrest the Chief Executive of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, Ms KATE DAVIES.
No, “Charity Shopper”, upholding the law really does matter! As does, amongst other things, upholding trading standards, as does not trading with broken steps to trip up potential customers, as does breaking Tort law, as does breaking Contract law, as does breaking Consumer Protection and Fair Trading law, as does breaking Housing law, as does breaking Criminal law, as does breaking Charity law, as does breaking the very strict law of Trusts.
Try saying that to any NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant that upholding the law does not really matter, as NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country - with over £400 MILLION (£400,000,000+) of assets in cash lying dormant in reserve – why? - and the majority of the properties of the Trust are in a disgusting and UNLAWFUL condition not fit for human habitation, many properties are damp to the core and infested with vermin and UNLAWFULLY not fit to live in, with lights DELIBERATELY extinguished in the common parts of many of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties.
This fact is supported with overwhelming documentary evidence and witness statements from furious complaining tenants who are Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust that have been languishing in limbo. Too many tenants have made legitimate complaints to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and those incompetent and third rate senior management who act unlawfully to good respectable tenants do not even respond with an acknowledgement letter, whilst the poor tenants suffer and fester in slum properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that are unlawfully, yes, UNLAWFULLY in disrepair – the evidence is out there to be seen]. Stress, anxiety, and bad health of the good tenants deteriorate whilst the Personal Injury claim of the good respectable tenant increases in severity.
The next time a tenant - of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - is KILLED by a defective NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST heater after numerous complaints to the senior management - the response – nothing – remember, such deaths have happened before. This indicates a complicit senior management who act UNLAWFULLY. Therefore, think very carefully “Charity Shopper” or you too will be supporting and even inciting the growth of the new [Peter] RACHMAN or slum landlord [from NOTTING HILL] – who eventually ended up in front of the civil courts and the criminal courts [and he was sent down with a long custodial sentence - his name has become a byword for slums, lies and deception – not unlike the usual methods of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST]!
Take note, LABOUR PARTY DICTATORS THAT ARE THE ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP in the UK. The LABOUR PARTY DICTATIRS have been working on social engineering, as GERARD LEMOS [the ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST] who was assisted by the research undertaken by the LSE, which appears to go hand in hand with that conducted by the ex LABOUR PARTY Councillor of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM COUNCIL and later LABOUR PARTY Housing Minister NIC RAYNSFORD who has undertaken research on these issues, as has the ODPM. They know that the evidence is a MAJOR SCANDAL – it would discredit a banana (ELECTIVE) DICTATORSHIP (even the fourth richest country in the world)!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has become a byword for living in a slum supported by confrontational landlords who do not care to consult nor communicate as reasonable landlords.
The attempt to enslave us all under the elective dictatorship of the deeply flawed COMMUNIST inspired ideology of LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, PETER REDMAN, GERARD LEMOS, KATE DAVIES, NIC RAYNSFORD and their cohorts, as epitomised and underpinned by the blood RED flag and blood RED livery that abounds in, on and around ‘the flagship’ London Borough of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM which these past 38 [thirty eight] years [from 1968] has trampled over all our hard won freedoms, liberties and rights, destroyed by every hard left thinking LABOUR government, which was enthusiastically endorsed by ‘the flagship’ London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST was always carrying out Central Government diktat or more correctly the diktat regulated from GROVE HOUSE, 27 HAMMERSMITH GROVE, LONDON W6 OLJ, the REAL ‘SECRET’ Government entity, tucked discreetly away in the very heart of leafy Hammersmith [how DEVIOUSLY CLEVER]!
It appears that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is totally immune from prosecution?
Why was there no prosecution by the DPP when the 45+ exclusive properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that were held in Trust as part of the housing stock that were earmarked for vulnerable tenants were misappropriated and no prosecution was ever launched by the DPP for FRAUD?
WHY?
Who is the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) – head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) – the person responsible for determining which individual or entity to prosecute in this country [by the two basic tests:
i) the Evidential Test, and
ii) the Public Interest Test]?
Is the DPP not KEN MACDONALD?
Was KEN MACDONALD not the senior tenant of Matrix Chambers in Gray’s Inn, a very good friend of Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair?
Did not CHERIE BOOTH a.k.a. CHERIE BLAIR, recommend KEN MACDONALD to TONY B.LIAR as DPP? [Does not pillow talk work wonders?]
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST certainly has friends with platforms in the highest echelons – LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, LABOUR LORD, CLIVE SOLEY, LABOUR LORD, CHARLES FALCONER, LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR.
Just look at the composition of the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
There lies the clear evidence.
Ask again, what exactly is a Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ISO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY doing advising the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as Company Secretary?
On Thursday 4 May 2006, the blood RED flag and all it stands for FELL over the Town Halls of: i) Hammersmith, and ii) Fulham, in the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – ‘the flagship’ Borough in the UK.
Is it not an implied term of the contract of employment of all employees of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that all prospective employees of the London Borough are members of one extremely (symbolically RED) leaning political party?
Yet, make no mistake, we the tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are not stupid.
We do not want a hard LEFT wing government.
We do not want a hard RIGHT wing government.
We the vulnerable tenants want a BALANCE!
We want the door OPEN!
We want complete CONSULTATION.
Otherwise LABOUR – without the SUPPORT of vulnerable tenants - is consigned to the WILDERNESS!!!
WE WILL DECIDE WHAT WILL HAPPEN!!!
As from Thursday 4 May 2006, ‘the flagship’ London Borough of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham is comprised of 33 CONSERVATIVE Councillors and 13 LABOUR Councillors.
The Labour Party has been rocked to its core. The ‘flagship’ Borough has FALLEN!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, NEIL KINNOCK predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, CLIVE SOLEY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, MICHAEL LEVY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, NIC RAYNSFORD predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR predicted!
[There is ONE missing… the ‘4’ + the ‘3’!]
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS ALL thought.
Yet – all of them – were warned by ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that TOM SAWYER would be discredited.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that GERARD LEMOS would be discredited – so he was! He ran off to the People’s Republic of China with his ‘Little Red (COMMUNIST) Book’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that the flawed DYSFUNCTIONAL ex COMMUNIST CHARLES CLARKE and PATRICIA HEWITT would have to go – ‘BLACK WEDNESDAY’ proved ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ right!
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied ‘the FLAGSHIP’ London Borough would FALL – it DID!
BUT the stupid fools at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST would not LISTEN or ACT to SUPPORT vulnerable tenants or ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.
DISRESPECT vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ at your PERIL.
Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ can SUPPORT any POLITICAL PARTY.
Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ SUPPORTS VULNERABLE tenants.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a choice.
IT LEADS…! Do you remember those words - KD? They will come back to haunt you for EVER!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST will DEFINE ITS POSITION and thereby seal its FATE!
FOR GOOD or FOR EVIL???
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST unreasonably PLAYS with the lives of VULNERABLE tenants and treats VULNERABLE lives as mere ‘VEGETABLES’ – to try to DESTROY – ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ will employ its powerful two-edged sword…
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ never threatens.
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ WILL PROMISE and DELIVER on that promise...
john
e-mail:
john_smith_mail@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST CHARITY SHOPS - LABOUR PARTY ABUSE!
29.05.2006 17:17
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ Shops are all part of one of the largest and most lucrative of ‘Charitable Trusts’ in this country.
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a Charitable TRUST, then why does it commit UNLAWFUL ACTS in relation to flagrantly breaching trading standards and clear, unambiguous, strict laws of this country, amongst others, breaches of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1979, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Trade Descriptions Act 1968, the Trade Descriptions Act 1972, and the Sale of Goods Act 1979?
The Sale of Goods Act 1979 asserts, amongst other things, that: i) In a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied condition that Goods must correspond to their description [Section 13(1)]; ii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied condition that Goods must be of merchantable quality [Section 14(2)]; iii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business for a particular purpose, there is an implied condition that Goods supplied are reasonably fit for their purpose. [Section 14(3)]
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for IMPLIED TERMS in a Contract.
ALL these laws are some of the many laws that SUPPORT the vulnerable tenants:
i) Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998
ii) Protection from Harassment Act (PHA) 1997
iii) Protection from Eviction Act (PEA) 1977
iv) Criminal Law Act (CLA) 1977
v) Housing Act (HA) 1988
vi) Housing Act (HA) 2004
vii) Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998
Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) – the overriding objective is to enable the Court to deal with cases justly.
BASIC IMPLIED TERMS OF ANY TENANCY:
1. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD NOT TO DEROGATE (deprive) FROM THE GRANT (of the Tenancy)!
There is a STRICT obligation on the landlord not to DEROGATE [or deprive a Tenant] from the GRANT of an Assured Tenancy – the landlord must NOT do anything on the retained property by the Assured Tenant, so as to make the land that has been let to the Assured Tenant less fit for the particular purpose for which the letting was made. Yet, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has broken the tenancy contracts of too many tenants in CIVIL law and in CRIMINAL law. [BREACH OF CONTRACT – DAMAGES ARE IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT!]
2. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD of QUIET ENJOYMENT!
It is UNLAWFUL for the Landlord or his agent or any other person associated with the landlord to unlawfully intimidate or harass the tenant. [If not, immediately go to COURT!]
3. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY FIT FOR HUMAN HABITATION
The property let by the Landlord must be free from DAMP, INFESTATION of any kind, STRUCTURALLY SOUND, not a danger by its SECURITY or SAFETY and the COMMON PARTS MUST BE SAFE, WELL LIT, and any and ALL LIFTS IN GOOD WORKING ORDER, with a working phone in them, in case of break down. Fire appliances and fire safety equipment must be available throughout the property. No asbestos. No live wires (whether this is next to water leaks or not). It would be UNLAWFUL for the landlords to provide heaters that spew out CARBON MONOXIDE poison if th(is)ese fact/s ha(s)ve been notified to the landlords.
If the landlords promise to put the structure or fitted carpets or any essential part of the property in good order and fail to do so, this constitutes an ANICIPATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT! [DAMAGES are then OBTAINABLE!]
Proof of a breach makes the Landlord STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
4. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY THAT IS SUITABLE
If a Tenant suffers from CLAUSTROPHOBIA and/or the fear/stress compounded by or brought on by restricted spaces and/or this medical condition has been expressly asserted to the Landlord, the landlord MUST immediately take the necessary action or suffer the consequences accordingly. It is UNLAWFUL to provide a property that is NOT suitable for the particular tenant.
If a tenant is ‘dumped’ in a damp flat in massive disrepair and as a result, the tenant sustains severe pains and spasms due to the adverse, hostile, deliberate and vindictive acts of his landlords, the tenant accrues a LEGAL RIGHT of action against the landlord.
It becomes UNLAWFUL for the landlord NOT to take the necessary lawful action.
5. PROPERTY MUST BE SAFE
If a tenant suffers as a result of the landlord NOT taking the degree of care that a LAWFUL landlord would take, the landlord will be held STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY committed the following acts:
i) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up the windows of a tenant’s property,
ii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up a tenant’s easement to his garden,
iii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY broken into a tenant’s flat not once - but twice - stealing the tenant’s files and deliberately and UNLAWFULLY causing criminal damage to the tenant’s personal locks and UNLAWFULLY committing break-ins and UNLAWFUL entry into the tenant’s flat. The second time the tenant photographed some of the management of the landlords committing CRIMINAL acts [COMMITTING CRIMES] by two cameras, whereby the management were identified as tooled up with offensive weapons and after following the management back to the staff entrance of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST where other management were waiting to receive the CRIMINAL MANAGEMENT [to try to subvert the evidence?] the tenant thereafter was immediately granted a High Court Injunction and the High Court Judge saw evidence of the RACHMAN methods perpetrated by the EVIL landlord. Next time it was stated IT WILL BE immediate PRISON - even For The CHIEF EXECUTIVE!
The two latest UNLAWFUL matters, the tenants obtained an Injunction against the management and against the Chief Executive [KATE DAVIES] of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who acted in a CRIMINAL way, after she was notified of the first UNLAWFUL Break-In by RECORDED DELIVERY and by FAX. The Injunction asserts that the CHIEF EXECUTIVE [(THE EVIL) KATE DAVIES] can be: i) IMPRISONED, ii) FINED and/or iii) HAVE HER ASSETS SEIZED, if she commits and/or incites through her management, once again: a) the tampering of the Assured Tenant’s electricity [so that the Tenant is obliged ‘to crawl on his hands and knees’ [this appeared in the local newspaper (dated Friday April 28, 2006 – the very week before the LOCAL ELECTIONS on Thursday, 4 May 2006)] in order to get in or get out of his flat], b) the tampering of the tenant’s water supply, and/or c) the theft of the tenant’s own personal or official mail.
How could anyone be so EVIL and so WICKED to vulnerable tenants?
The documentary evidence speaks volumes.
[Did the Chief Executive do the same at SERVITE HOUSES – as Chief Executive?]
[Ex turpi causa non oritur actio - No cause of action may be founded upon an IMMORAL or ILLEGAL act.]
All these matters NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have been known to have breached.
All of these breaches are UNLAWFUL.
As the photograph above indicates, the entrances to some of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops are DANGEROUS and can cause injuries. This is also UNLAWFUL.
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for DEATH and/or PERSONAL INJURY. [Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, Section 2(1)]
Would you really want to sustain a serious injury in order to part with your hard earned money in order to consider ‘throwing away’ your hard earned money to a highly questionable ‘Charitable’ cause?
Do the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops still exist or have they been re-branded? Is this WRONGFUL TRADING? Is this FRAUDULENT TRADING?
It is known of at least 2 (TWO) good, pleasant, sociable, respectable and extremely honourable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who complained in writing to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST about the very DANGEROUS defects in their homes which were the legal responsibility of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST which not only allowed but INCITED breaches of the strict LEGAL DUTY OF CARE to be UNLAWFULLY caused by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and this breach of the lawful duty of care CAUSED the DEATHS of at least 2 (TWO) good, respectable Tenants.
As a result of the NEGLIGENT/RECKLESS action of the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the good respectable tenants were to die [yes, DIE] UNLAWFULLY.
Were they killed?
They certainly DIED.
Both DIED cursing [yes, CURSING. I know, as I have the evidence] NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and its senior management are EVIL beyond measure.
The senior management, acting with gay abandon [as under the authority of GERARD LEMOS (yes, him of 7 BISHAM GARDENS, HIGHGATE) – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Government Race Adviser – Commissioner of the Audit Commission – Commissioner of the Civil Service – Deputy Chairman of the British Council – all nominated by LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER (yes, him of 22 INCHMERY ROAD, CATFORD), ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and before that ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY and before that, head of the NATIONAL UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (NUPE) being in a position of responsibility for Central Government and Local Government employees – now known as UNISON UNION, and then his nominations were automatically appointed by LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR – yes, TOM SAWYER, as the representative of the workers has to be ‘on board’], wafts on with no communication to tenants who are also Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust, where the management act with confrontation, a lack of consultation, hostility, intimidation and harassment, oblivious to the grave concerns and legal consequences that mount on a daily basis.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a LEGAL DUTY to adhere strictly to Trust law. If it does not, any Beneficiary of the Charitable Trust can immediately apply to the Court to initiate an action in Breach of Trust.
What are the objectives of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops?
The landlord, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST owns 19,000+ properties [worth over 4 BILLION (£4,000,000,000) + pounds in the prime locations across London - which are legally owned by the Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust.
YES, but who are all those Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust to whom we refer?
They are the 50,000 [fifty thousand] tenants of ‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) referred to by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as only mere ‘CUSTOMERS’ – no more. It sounds as if the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are referring to some kind of 50,000 [fifty thousand] illiterate, inarticulate ‘VEGETABLES’ who are wholly unaware of their immediate surroundings and who do not have any kind of brain, as if they are those who will never ever take effective action against the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST regarding the severe UNLAWFUL disrepair of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties and/or the confrontational, hostile, aggressive attitude of intimidation and harassment that is demonstrated regularly by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to the good tenants that raise legitimate complaints to the senior management.
Yet NO RESPONSE – AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN!
The only solution is the LEGAL solution - the COURTS.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST treat the tenants as: i) ‘VEGETABLES’, and to anyone who complains in writing, ii) Place a ‘PLANT’ next to the ‘VEGETABLE’. [The Psychological War carried out by Proxy/Others!]
If a good reasonable tenant raises legitimate complaints in writing, immediately, 2 (two) courses of action are initiated by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST:
i) Place the good tenant DELIBERATELY in PURPORTED RENT ARREARS [thank you local authority for your co-operation, do the local authority not deliberately INHIBIT or STOP the Housing Benefit for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST good respectable tenants?
As we all know, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are on first name terms with the Housing Department of the Local Authority and are they also not members of the same political party who support each other?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST supply the properties from their vastly expanding housing stock from unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM which washes through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION; whilst the housing authority of the local authority has the legal duty to house the various housing priority ‘cases’ and the local authority rely on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to provide the properties.
Does not the local authority feel obligated to comply with the requests of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to deliberately inhibit or stop a tenant’s Housing Benefit?
Yes – NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST manage people or ‘customers’ not houses!]; ii) place a ‘TENANT FROM HELL’ [a ‘PLANT’ placed next door to a good tenant.] [Is this not where ‘the CYRENIANS’ comes in particularly useful? – there is a contract that was entered into between ‘the CYRENIANS’ and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST for a considerable sum of money whereby the Charity called ‘THE CYRENIANS’ needs to house people with severe psychological problems, often with severe drug and anti–social tendencies, to place prospective tenants which are placed at the discretion of the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – ideally, as far as the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are concerned, to place unlawfully such tenants next door to the tenant who has raised legitimate complaints in writing? and iii) place the tenant in administrative isolation – then besiege the good tenant with local government and central government imperatives.
Do this – or else!
ISOLATE, DEMONISE and (try to) DISCREDIT?
This is where the astronomically expensive specifically designed NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST computer comes in useful!
This is where the Patrol Officers come in useful.
This is where the Tenant Officers come in useful.
All EVIL tactics done deliberately to intimidate and harass good tenants.
It never fails to amaze the wicked tactics NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can employ!
In the meantime, the management deliberately and UNLAWFULLY switch off the lights in the common parts of so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties of vulnerable tenants!
These are the actions of CRIMINALS.
The new RACHMANISM!
KEEP A DIARY.
Take the right LEGAL steps.
With ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ come ‘THE GHOSTS’.
Who are ‘THE GHOSTS’?
One NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant living in what was, until 4th May 2006, the ‘flagship’ Borough, the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (since 1968 – 38 years) was very recently unlawfully denied his vote. He was informed by specific individuals in authority that he did not live in a particular building. This was a deliberate lie. This was a deliberate deceit.
Yet specific individuals who are employees of the local authority of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham knowingly and unlawfully placed 4 (four) ‘GHOSTS’ in an empty flat which they knew was empty and the flat has only ever housed one adult, and under the postal vote, allowed four votes to be registered and recorded for that particular tiny flat. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham when informed of the reality and of the full facts, acted with surprising intransigence, inertia, complacency and hostility in not being prepared to remove ‘THE GHOSTS’. [Is it true that there is an identification number on the polling card so is it not possible for those in a position of authority to check how an individual voted? Is it still the case that Labour Party membership is an implied term of the employment contract for those employees employed within the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – and the only way for ensuring promotion for the senior officers of ‘the flagship’ Borough?]
If the tenant does not begin as a ‘VEGETABLE’, after careful initial screening by NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Tenant Questionnaire – then NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST place ‘PLANTS’ with psychological problems next to the carefully targeted tenant. Yes, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST house ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ in their properties – where all private landlords house REAL people with REAL feelings and REAL emotions. Indeed, if a good respectable tenant does not start as INCAPACITATED and VULNERABLE – the research department of social policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) together with the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST know how to incapacitate a good respectable tenant to the level of a passive ‘VEGETABLE’. Then they house ‘PLANTS’ and thereafter they seem intent to be determined to house ‘GHOSTS’.
[LSE is the college of London University from where Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair undertook her LLB law degree (before she undertook her Bar exams at Lincoln’s Inn as did TONY BLAIR). She met DERRY IRVINE (the part-time law lecturer) at LSE – who later put her and TONY BLAIR together [as pupils in his law chambers]. In 1994 on the Leader of the LABOUR PARTY, the Barrister, John Smith’s death, DERRY IRVINE arranged, through PETER MANDELSON, for TONY BLAIR to be the leader of the ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP, whom DERRY IRVINE [as Shadow Lord Chancellor, the latter day Cardinal Wolsey to the autocrat dictator, Henry VIII] believed he could control. Now MICHAEL LEVY (11/7/44) of Chase House, Nan Clarks Lane, at Mill Hill, London NW7 4HH believes the same.
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘THE LABOUR PROJECT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘TONY BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHERIE BOOTH/BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHEQUERS – AND ITS TENNIS COURT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of the ‘LABOUR PARTY TREASURY - DONATIONS or is it quasi ‘LOANS’ (with no intermediaries – TONY blackmailed?)?
So very easy for a good political party to be TOTALLY CORRUPTED?
TONY BLAIR nominated MICHAEL LEVY as Envoy in the Middle East (appointed on 14/5/2004).
Yet, is there not a slight question of a Conflict of Interest for him to be nominated as a British Envoy in the Middle East?
Does he have NO training in diplomacy?
Would he be accepted by both parties in the Middle East to broker a dispute, to be seen as Impartial?
Is there not also a question concerning ACCOUNTABILITY?
…and a question of TRANSPARENCY?
Who, after all, is the Official Treasurer of the LABOUR PARTY?
JACK DROMEY (21/9/1948) sits on the NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) of the LABOUR PARTY as (Official Labour Party) TREASURER – the husband of HARRIET HARMAN MP (20/7/1950) of 1 Winterbrook Road, London SE24 9HZ who is a LABOUR PARTY Minister in the Department of Constitutional Affairs (DCA) responsible for Elections and ‘Crown’ (the Illusion/Perception/not the Reality) matters (“How ironic ‘Harry’, seeing as you worked in Brent Law Centre as a solicitor and knowing so well your staunchly Republican views? We even spoke about them, in private…”) ‘under’ CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER (19/11/1951) of 34 Alwyne Road, London N1 2HW from Fountain Court Chambers (TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate) OR is the REAL Treasurer the UNOFFICIAL TREASURER (the qualified accountant – M&G Records etc.) MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY (who has direct access to the PRIME MINISTER with no intermediaries) – Mr LABOUR PARTY LORD ‘CASH-POINT’?]
WHY target VULNERABLE tenants?
To target vulnerable tenants is the most deliberate and evil scheme that any person or entity could activate in order to socially engineer an incapacitated vulnerable class which suffers daily STRESS, ANXIETY and ADVERSE HEALTH.
The LABOUR (PARTY) Government SOCIAL EXCLUSION DEPARTMENT maintains very close contact with NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the LSE and the ODPM Research Department.
SOCIAL EXCLUSION – this is no Freudian slip – this is DELIBERATE.
This is UNCONSCIONABLE!
This is WICKED!
This is VILE!
This is EVIL!
A genuine CARING COMMUNITY would focus on SOCIAL INCLUSION but NOT the LABOUR PARTY.
LABOUR are DEVIOUS
LABOUR are CONFRONTATIONAL
LABOUR are WICKED
LABOUR are EVIL
This was no mistake.
This coming week more vulnerable NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants will be deliberately targeted by the EVIL EMPIRE.
The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST waft off in a drunken or is it a smoked insensibility laughing to their exclusive wine bars in Hammersmith!
The more the Evil from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the more ‘THE (GOOD) HIDDEN HAND’ will knock out the Evil of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
If the EVIL is increased, this WILL result in the END of the Evil Empire.
Is this WISE?
We want BALANCE not POLARISATION in POLITICS!
BUT we will react – to the EVIL that attacks us.
We know who YOU ARE.
We know where YOU LIVE.
We know you are CORRUPT.
We know you DECEIVE.
We know you are out to SUBVERT DEMOCRACY.
We know you are out to SUBVERT the LAW!
So, the legal Beneficiaries of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are known by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST simply as mere ‘Customers’.
These so-called ‘Customers’ are not receiving ‘a service’ but are the unconditional and lawful inheritors of the Wills of the many testators and the Beneficiaries of substantial government largesse.
The pretext as an aim of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Charity is for “Key Workers”.
Why would “Key Workers” be the recipients or the cause of a Charitable Trust? Surely that does not fall within the scope of the 4 (four) classic heads of what does constitute a Charity. [The four heads of Charity being: i) Relief of Poverty, ii) Advancement of Education, iii) Advancement of Religion, iv) Other Purposes Beneficial to the Community, not falling under the other heads.]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) has paid some 24 BILLION [£24,000,000,000] of unaccountable taxpayers money through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION which falls under the responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable JOHN PRESCOTT, and such taxpayers money is then paid into REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) otherwise known as HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs).
The REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) or HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs)
are given their quality rating by the unaccountable and non-transparent entity called the AUDIT COMMISSION which also falls under the responsibility of the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). The responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable John Prescott.
The Department (ODPM) is described in independent authoritative reports as ‘dysfunctional’ and in a way that its management is ‘incompetent, and inefficient’ and acting like a ‘pantomime horse’, with a total ‘lack of accountability and waste.’
WHY?
In order to facilitate the provision of housing for non indigenous citizens who in their gratitude [MAY] vote for the LABOUR PARTY.
But what of the Indigenous citizens?
BLAIR, PRESCOTT, KELLY, SAWYER, SOLEY, RAYNSFORD, LEVY, POWELL (Jonathan, brother of Charles – and Dame Sally Ann (Vickers) Powell (2/10/1955) – ex Cabinet member of Regeneration on the Council of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham of 30 Coverdale Road, W12 8JL one of only 2 LABOUR PARTY Councillors on the National Executive Committee (NEC), wife of Iain Coleman the ex LABOUR PARTY MP for Hammersmith and Fulham), SLAUGHTER, LEMOS, DAVIES, appear to care not a Jot!
The Dysfunctional Dictator appears to care not one Iota.
Just HATE, GREED, HOSTILITY and WAR.
Has George Orwell’s (‘Eric Blair’) ‘1984’ arrived – the imagined date of the elective (evil) dictator (B.LIAR)?
‘The flagship’ Registered Social Landlord/Housing Association is NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
The records of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country] [a bastion and citadel that favours LABOUR PARTY policy] speak volumes, as do the records of ‘the flagship’ Borough in this country. The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that has doggedly supported the LABOUR PARTY [whatever the politics of central government and its OFFICERS continue today to doggedly pursue LABOUR PARTY policy]
Thursday, 4 May 2006 was a turning point across the country – LOCAL ELECTION TIME!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants ACTED decisively!
WHY?
Because
THE CHAIRMAN
THE DIRECTORS
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
THE COMPANY SECRETARY
Did they not all support the LABOUR PARTY?
The LABOUR PARTY showed, by their actions, that they hated ALL indigenous tenants.
The evidence indicates clearly that the LABOUR PARTY despise indigenous tenants.
The LABOUR PARTY despise patriotism. They try to call it “RACISM”.
The LABOUR PARTY wanted to destroy good respectable tenants who are British.
The LABOUR PARTY insist on MULTICULTURISM taking PRIORITY.
The work of the discredited GERARD LEMOS – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – revolved around social engineering - using NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants.
Similarly, the senior OFFICERS of the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM did they not also all support the LABOUR PARTY? The Implied Term of the Employment Contract?
Can the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM not unlawfully INHIBIT or stop the Housing Benefit of tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST when they want to, to the assent of their LABOUR PARTY friends at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, just as a tap of water is turned on so it can be turned off? The only difference is that ‘the water’ is not water but ‘Housing Benefit’, to pay rent for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST flats. Both the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are inter-connected.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can decide the Rent levels - £40 per week or £400 per week for the same studio/bedsit flat?
‘RENT RE-STRUCTURING’ has been imposed on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [if it wants to implement it - in its discretion] by the LABOUR PARTY which is a scam to massively increase rents to market rents to hit Council tenants and Registered Social Landlord (RSL)/Housing Association (HA) tenants.
This was ALL put in place by LABOUR PARTY LORD, CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER?
WHO IS HE?
Is he not TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate who lives in his own private home and his ex flat mate was TONY BLAIR who nominated him as LABOUR PARTY LORD CHANCELLOR – to place him in charge of all laws, all courts, all judges (their appointment, promotion and dismissal), all magistrates (their appointment and dismissal), all law officers (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) and all law staff (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) in the UK?
Oh, and he is in charge of the House of Lords as a Parliamentary Chamber (Legislature), the House of Lords as the highest Court of Appeal in the UK (Judiciary) and perhaps the most senior (and sane?) person in the Cabinet (Executive). With control over ALL three arms of Government! [And not forgetting, in charge of CROWN and CONSTITUTIONAL issues and has responsibility to oversee the three (3) British so-called places of lower taxation or ‘tax havens’ where Cherie (and Leo) have been known to enjoy the beach and the hospitality for good measure – all at taxpayers expense (staying ‘in private’ at Government House)? Is it not also a good place to organise some off-shore Banking, Cherie? Particularly in one of the Channel Islands (where no attempts have been made nor will ever be made to socially engineer any of the people – vulnerable or otherwise)? Why not educate TONY about REAL ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ (before it is too late?)!]
So much for TOTAL control of the Elective Dictatorship.
Similarly, Central Government is closely inter-related with Local Government. Is that not the reason why Jonathan Buchanan was nominated to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the man from the LABOUR Government Intelligence Service [whose duty it is to spy on others – as tenants of the Trust - at the will of the LABOUR Government] was he not ‘planted’ on to the Board of Directors/Trustees as a Director/Trustee?
Is that not why each and every Director/Trustee appointed to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a specific contribution to make in order to oversee the direction of the Evil LABOUR PARTY policies, in order to target good, respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who have raised legitimate complaints to the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
It is clear why there is no response.
It is clear why various agencies support NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST with enthusiasm!
This is all LABOUR PARTY B.LIARISM at its high water mark!
This is the LABOUR PARTY DESTRUCTION OF BRITISH DEMOCRACY at its high water mark!
This is ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP at its high water mark!
Is this not the way of DYSFUNCTIONAL cowards and bullies in Cabinet and in the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Board of Directors/Trustees at its high water mark?
We believe in the rule of LAW.
We believe in DEMOCRACY.
We believe in ACCOUNTABILITY.
We believe in TRANSPARENCY.
We believe that those who govern as ‘the AGENTS’ of us THE PEOPLE or ‘the PRINCIPALS’ – those ‘AGENTS’ can be removed at OUR WILL – and it SHALL be so!
Recently, on 27 April 2006 the Company Secretary of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP, acting on the advice of the Board of Directors/Trustees [are they not ‘the Puppets’ of the LABOUR political party?] attempted to seek the removal of legitimate truthful comments of good respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST posted across the Internet [in many world wide jurisdictions beamed in to the UK] in order to suppress the truth in an effort to try to compromise “freedom of speech” in a democratic and accountable society governed by the rule of law.
Ms IBIJOKE OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY is the Chartered Secretary to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP. She has been the Company Secretary since March 2004.
[The law might be different in Ms IBIJOKE ESO’s country of birth. An elective dictator may rule in her country of birth? She may not know about OUR rule of law? She may not know that “freedom of speech” is uppermost in a democratic and accountable society with transparent government, governed by the rule of law. The administrators in this country are our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’. Our elected representatives and their cohorts are also our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’!]
[Our Prime Minister has a LEGAL DUTY to be our ‘Servant’ of ‘the People’!]
Only one other company has Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ESO and her husband directed. But that company was obliged to be dissolved after just 3 (three) years.
WHY?
The husband of Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) is Mr OLADAPO OLADIPO ESO (1/3/1966).
But why would NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP appoint to the Board of Directors/Trustees a Company Secretary that is vastly inexperienced to run an entity with some 19,000 (nineteen thousand)+ properties worth over £4 BILLION [£4,000,000,000+] receiving unlimited unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM and its unaccountable entities?
Is it not easier to commit a CIVIL wrong [known as a TORT] or worse, a CRIMINAL WRONG [a CRIME] and the entity that commits or the entities that commit such a wrong is deemed to be a CRIMINAL [or CRIMINALS], by employing an inexperienced Company Secretary whose only claim to fame is to direct their own [husband and wife] company that has ended up in dissolution?
Is it reasonable for the major ‘flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in the UK to employ a massively INEXPERIENCED senior officer as COMPANY SECRETARY to run and to delegate the affairs of such a major entity to others?
What about the issues of Corporate Accountability?
What about the issues of Trust Accountability?
What about the issues of Transparency?
What about the issues of Consultation?
What about the issues of Good Communication?
What about the issues of Good Governance?
The evidence indicates NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a vehicle for:
i) Fraud,
ii) Deceit,
iii) Criminal activities,
iv) Unaccountability,
v) Non-Transparency,
vi) Third Class Management,
vii) The Perpetrator of Intimation and Harassment, and
viii) The Perpetrator of Major Breaches of Trust?
Is that why NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is hurriedly trying to re-brand the unaccountable entity?
Why no consultation?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP can not avoid legal liability for its many breaches of Trust.
The Company Secretary appears to come not from Europe but from foreign parts – in line with LABOUR PARTY dogma – to try to divide the British people and for an ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP to take control and to DICTATE?
Was this a wise course of action [for purely political individuals to impose political dogma in breach of Trust]?
Yet, there appear to be very good reasons for such a perverse policy which has nothing to do with good, accountable, transparent, governance, involving the pursuance of upholding LEGAL DUTIES of the vulnerable Beneficiaries. i.e. the 50,000 (fifty thousand) good, respectable tenants.
All the evidence - documentary, oral and real - suggests other reasons:
FRAUD?
GERRYMANDERING?
DECEIT?
CORRUPTION?
BREACHES OF TRUST?
ON AN ASTRONOMICAL SCALE?
THE ENRON OF THE UK?
Is it the case that NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP is nothing but a political sham – to gerrymander political constituencies for the next general election? All the evidence suggests that is the reality, as the perception is given by the so-called “Charity Shopper” who appears to be none other than a member of management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP? Otherwise, why would a person [“Charity Shopper”] incite the breaking of the law on the spurious ground of: “some picky reason that doesn’t really matter that much”?
This makes sense why so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP tenants are living in unlawful conditions and why they have to obtain Injunctions with a power of arrest, against NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST management, and even a power to arrest the Chief Executive of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, Ms KATE DAVIES.
No, “Charity Shopper”, upholding the law really does matter! As does, amongst other things, upholding trading standards, as does not trading with broken steps to trip up potential customers, as does breaking Tort law, as does breaking Contract law, as does breaking Consumer Protection and Fair Trading law, as does breaking Housing law, as does breaking Criminal law, as does breaking Charity law, as does breaking the very strict law of Trusts.
Try saying that to any NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant that upholding the law does not really matter, as NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country - with over £400 MILLION (£400,000,000+) of assets in cash lying dormant in reserve – why? - and the majority of the properties of the Trust are in a disgusting and UNLAWFUL condition not fit for human habitation, many properties are damp to the core and infested with vermin and UNLAWFULLY not fit to live in, with lights DELIBERATELY extinguished in the common parts of many of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties.
This fact is supported with overwhelming documentary evidence and witness statements from furious complaining tenants who are Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust that have been languishing in limbo. Too many tenants have made legitimate complaints to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and those incompetent and third rate senior management who act unlawfully to good respectable tenants do not even respond with an acknowledgement letter, whilst the poor tenants suffer and fester in slum properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that are unlawfully, yes, UNLAWFULLY in disrepair – the evidence is out there to be seen]. Stress, anxiety, and bad health of the good tenants deteriorate whilst the Personal Injury claim of the good respectable tenant increases in severity.
The next time a tenant - of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - is KILLED by a defective NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST heater after numerous complaints to the senior management - the response – nothing – remember, such deaths have happened before. This indicates a complicit senior management who act UNLAWFULLY. Therefore, think very carefully “Charity Shopper” or you too will be supporting and even inciting the growth of the new [Peter] RACHMAN or slum landlord [from NOTTING HILL] – who eventually ended up in front of the civil courts and the criminal courts [and he was sent down with a long custodial sentence - his name has become a byword for slums, lies and deception – not unlike the usual methods of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST]!
Take note, LABOUR PARTY DICTATORS THAT ARE THE ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP in the UK. The LABOUR PARTY DICTATIRS have been working on social engineering, as GERARD LEMOS [the ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST] who was assisted by the research undertaken by the LSE, which appears to go hand in hand with that conducted by the ex LABOUR PARTY Councillor of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM COUNCIL and later LABOUR PARTY Housing Minister NIC RAYNSFORD who has undertaken research on these issues, as has the ODPM. They know that the evidence is a MAJOR SCANDAL – it would discredit a banana (ELECTIVE) DICTATORSHIP (even the fourth richest country in the world)!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has become a byword for living in a slum supported by confrontational landlords who do not care to consult nor communicate as reasonable landlords.
The attempt to enslave us all under the elective dictatorship of the deeply flawed COMMUNIST inspired ideology of LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, PETER REDMAN, GERARD LEMOS, KATE DAVIES, NIC RAYNSFORD and their cohorts, as epitomised and underpinned by the blood RED flag and blood RED livery that abounds in, on and around ‘the flagship’ London Borough of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM which these past 38 [thirty eight] years [from 1968] has trampled over all our hard won freedoms, liberties and rights, destroyed by every hard left thinking LABOUR government, which was enthusiastically endorsed by ‘the flagship’ London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST was always carrying out Central Government diktat or more correctly the diktat regulated from GROVE HOUSE, 27 HAMMERSMITH GROVE, LONDON W6 OLJ, the REAL ‘SECRET’ Government entity, tucked discreetly away in the very heart of leafy Hammersmith [how DEVIOUSLY CLEVER]!
It appears that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is totally immune from prosecution?
Why was there no prosecution by the DPP when the 45+ exclusive properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that were held in Trust as part of the housing stock that were earmarked for vulnerable tenants were misappropriated and no prosecution was ever launched by the DPP for FRAUD?
WHY?
Who is the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) – head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) – the person responsible for determining which individual or entity to prosecute in this country [by the two basic tests:
i) the Evidential Test, and
ii) the Public Interest Test]?
Is the DPP not KEN MACDONALD?
Was KEN MACDONALD not the senior tenant of Matrix Chambers in Gray’s Inn, a very good friend of Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair?
Did not CHERIE BOOTH a.k.a. CHERIE BLAIR, recommend KEN MACDONALD to TONY B.LIAR as DPP? [Does not pillow talk work wonders?]
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST certainly has friends with platforms in the highest echelons – LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, LABOUR LORD, CLIVE SOLEY, LABOUR LORD, CHARLES FALCONER, LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR.
Just look at the composition of the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
There lies the clear evidence.
Ask again, what exactly is a Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ISO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY doing advising the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as Company Secretary?
On Thursday 4 May 2006, the blood RED flag and all it stands for FELL over the Town Halls of: i) Hammersmith, and ii) Fulham, in the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – ‘the flagship’ Borough in the UK.
Is it not an implied term of the contract of employment of all employees of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that all prospective employees of the London Borough are members of one extremely (symbolically RED) leaning political party?
Yet, make no mistake, we the tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are not stupid.
We do not want a hard LEFT wing government.
We do not want a hard RIGHT wing government.
We the vulnerable tenants want a BALANCE!
We want the door OPEN!
We want complete CONSULTATION.
Otherwise LABOUR – without the SUPPORT of vulnerable tenants - is consigned to the WILDERNESS!!!
WE WILL DECIDE WHAT WILL HAPPEN!!!
As from Thursday 4 May 2006, ‘the flagship’ London Borough of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham is comprised of 33 CONSERVATIVE Councillors and 13 LABOUR Councillors.
The Labour Party has been rocked to its core. The ‘flagship’ Borough has FALLEN!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, NEIL KINNOCK predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, CLIVE SOLEY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, MICHAEL LEVY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, NIC RAYNSFORD predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR predicted!
[There is ONE missing… the ‘4’ + the ‘3’!]
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS ALL thought.
Yet – all of them – were warned by ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that TOM SAWYER would be discredited.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that GERARD LEMOS would be discredited – so he was! He ran off to the People’s Republic of China with his ‘Little Red (COMMUNIST) Book’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that the flawed DYSFUNCTIONAL ex COMMUNIST CHARLES CLARKE and PATRICIA HEWITT would have to go – ‘BLACK WEDNESDAY’ proved ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ right!
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied ‘the FLAGSHIP’ London Borough would FALL – it DID!
BUT the stupid fools at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST would not LISTEN or ACT to SUPPORT vulnerable tenants or ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.
DISRESPECT vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ at your PERIL.
Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ can SUPPORT any POLITICAL PARTY.
Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ SUPPORTS VULNERABLE tenants.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a choice.
IT LEADS…! Do you remember those words - KD? They will come back to haunt you for EVER!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST will DEFINE ITS POSITION and thereby seal its FATE!
FOR GOOD or FOR EVIL???
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST unreasonably PLAYS with the lives of VULNERABLE tenants and treats VULNERABLE lives as mere ‘VEGETABLES’ – to try to DESTROY – ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ will employ its powerful two-edged sword…
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ never threatens.
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ WILL PROMISE and DELIVER on that promise...
john
e-mail:
john_smith_mail@hotmail.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - THE BIG SCAM?
30.05.2006 01:26
[INLAND REVENUE REF: XN13652]
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ Shops are all part of one of the largest and most lucrative of ‘Charitable Trusts’ in this country.
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a Charitable TRUST, then why does it commit UNLAWFUL ACTS in relation to flagrantly breaching trading standards and clear, unambiguous, strict laws of this country, amongst others, breaches of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1979, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Trade Descriptions Act 1968, the Trade Descriptions Act 1972, and the Sale of Goods Act 1979?
The Sale of Goods Act 1979 asserts, amongst other things, that: i) In a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied condition that Goods must correspond to their description [Section 13(1)]; ii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied condition that Goods must be of merchantable quality [Section 14(2)]; iii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business for a particular purpose, there is an implied condition that Goods supplied are reasonably fit for their purpose. [Section 14(3)]
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for IMPLIED TERMS in a Contract.
ALL these laws are some of the many laws that SUPPORT the vulnerable tenants:
i) Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998
ii) Protection from Harassment Act (PHA) 1997
iii) Protection from Eviction Act (PEA) 1977
iv) Criminal Law Act (CLA) 1977
v) Housing Act (HA) 1988
vi) Housing Act (HA) 2004
vii) Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998
Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) – the overriding objective is to enable the Court to deal with cases justly.
BASIC IMPLIED TERMS OF ANY TENANCY:
1. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD NOT TO DEROGATE (deprive) FROM THE GRANT (of the Tenancy)!
There is a STRICT obligation on the landlord not to DEROGATE [or deprive a Tenant] from the GRANT of an Assured Tenancy – the landlord must NOT do anything on the retained property by the Assured Tenant, so as to make the land that has been let to the Assured Tenant less fit for the particular purpose for which the letting was made. Yet, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has broken the tenancy contracts of too many tenants in CIVIL law and in CRIMINAL law. [BREACH OF CONTRACT – DAMAGES ARE IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT!]
2. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD of QUIET ENJOYMENT!
It is UNLAWFUL for the Landlord or his agent or any other person associated with the landlord to unlawfully intimidate or harass the tenant. [If not, immediately go to COURT!]
3. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY FIT FOR HUMAN HABITATION
The property let by the Landlord must be free from DAMP, INFESTATION of any kind, STRUCTURALLY SOUND, not a danger by its SECURITY or SAFETY and the COMMON PARTS MUST BE SAFE, WELL LIT, and any and ALL LIFTS IN GOOD WORKING ORDER, with a working phone in them, in case of break down. Fire appliances and fire safety equipment must be available throughout the property. No asbestos. No live wires (whether this is next to water leaks or not). It would be UNLAWFUL for the landlords to provide heaters that spew out CARBON MONOXIDE poison if th(is)ese fact/s ha(s)ve been notified to the landlords.
If the landlords promise to put the structure or fitted carpets or any essential part of the property in good order and fail to do so, this constitutes an ANICIPATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT! [DAMAGES are then OBTAINABLE!]
Proof of a breach makes the Landlord STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
4. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY THAT IS SUITABLE
If a Tenant suffers from CLAUSTROPHOBIA and/or the fear/stress compounded by or brought on by restricted spaces and/or this medical condition has been expressly asserted to the Landlord, the landlord MUST immediately take the necessary action or suffer the consequences accordingly. It is UNLAWFUL to provide a property that is NOT suitable for the particular tenant.
If a tenant is ‘dumped’ in a damp flat in massive disrepair and as a result, the tenant sustains severe pains and spasms due to the adverse, hostile, deliberate and vindictive acts of his landlords, the tenant accrues a LEGAL RIGHT of action against the landlord.
It becomes UNLAWFUL for the landlord NOT to take the necessary lawful action.
5. PROPERTY MUST BE SAFE
If a tenant suffers as a result of the landlord NOT taking the degree of care that a LAWFUL landlord would take, the landlord will be held STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY committed the following acts:
i) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up the windows of a tenant’s property,
ii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up a tenant’s easement to his garden,
iii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY broken into a tenant’s flat not once - but twice - stealing the tenant’s files and deliberately and UNLAWFULLY causing criminal damage to the tenant’s personal locks and UNLAWFULLY committing break-ins and UNLAWFUL entry into the tenant’s flat. The second time the tenant photographed some of the management of the landlords committing CRIMINAL acts [COMMITTING CRIMES] by two cameras, whereby the management were identified as tooled up with offensive weapons and after following the management back to the staff entrance of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST where other management were waiting to receive the CRIMINAL MANAGEMENT [to try to subvert the evidence?] the tenant thereafter was immediately granted a High Court Injunction and the High Court Judge saw evidence of the RACHMAN methods perpetrated by the EVIL landlord. Next time it was stated IT WILL BE immediate PRISON - even For The CHIEF EXECUTIVE!
The two latest UNLAWFUL matters, the tenants obtained an Injunction against the management and against the Chief Executive [KATE DAVIES] of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who acted in a CRIMINAL way, after she was notified of the first UNLAWFUL Break-In by RECORDED DELIVERY and by FAX. The Injunction asserts that the CHIEF EXECUTIVE [(THE EVIL) KATE DAVIES] can be: i) IMPRISONED, ii) FINED and/or iii) HAVE HER ASSETS SEIZED, if she commits and/or incites through her management, once again: a) the tampering of the Assured Tenant’s electricity [so that the Tenant is obliged ‘to crawl on his hands and knees’ [this appeared in the local newspaper (dated Friday April 28, 2006 – the very week before the LOCAL ELECTIONS on Thursday, 4 May 2006)] in order to get in or get out of his flat], b) the tampering of the tenant’s water supply, and/or c) the theft of the tenant’s own personal or official mail.
How could anyone be so EVIL and so WICKED to vulnerable tenants?
The documentary evidence speaks volumes.
[Did the Chief Executive do the same at SERVITE HOUSES – as Chief Executive?]
[Ex turpi causa non oritur actio - No cause of action may be founded upon an IMMORAL or ILLEGAL act.]
All these matters NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have been known to have breached.
All of these breaches are UNLAWFUL.
As the photograph above indicates, the entrances to some of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops are DANGEROUS and can cause injuries. This is also UNLAWFUL.
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for DEATH and/or PERSONAL INJURY. [Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, Section 2(1)]
Would you really want to sustain a serious injury in order to part with your hard earned money in order to consider ‘throwing away’ your hard earned money to a highly questionable ‘Charitable’ cause?
Do the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops still exist or have they been re-branded? Is this WRONGFUL TRADING? Is this FRAUDULENT TRADING?
It is known of at least 2 (TWO) good, pleasant, sociable, respectable and extremely honourable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who complained in writing to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST about the very DANGEROUS defects in their homes which were the legal responsibility of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST which not only allowed but INCITED breaches of the strict LEGAL DUTY OF CARE to be UNLAWFULLY caused by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and this breach of the lawful duty of care CAUSED the DEATHS of at least 2 (TWO) good, respectable Tenants.
As a result of the NEGLIGENT/RECKLESS action of the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the good respectable tenants were to die [yes, DIE] UNLAWFULLY.
Were they killed?
They certainly DIED.
Both DIED cursing [yes, CURSING. I know, as I have the evidence] NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and its senior management are EVIL beyond measure.
The senior management, acting with gay abandon [as under the authority of GERARD LEMOS (yes, him of 7 BISHAM GARDENS, HIGHGATE) – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Government Race Adviser – Commissioner of the Audit Commission – Commissioner of the Civil Service – Deputy Chairman of the British Council – all nominated by LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER (yes, him of 22 INCHMERY ROAD, CATFORD), ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and before that ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY and before that, head of the NATIONAL UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (NUPE) being in a position of responsibility for Central Government and Local Government employees – now known as UNISON UNION, and then his nominations were automatically appointed by LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR – yes, TOM SAWYER, as the representative of the workers has to be ‘on board’], wafts on with no communication to tenants who are also Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust, where the management act with confrontation, a lack of consultation, hostility, intimidation and harassment, oblivious to the grave concerns and legal consequences that mount on a daily basis.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a LEGAL DUTY to adhere strictly to Trust law. If it does not, any Beneficiary of the Charitable Trust can immediately apply to the Court to initiate an action in Breach of Trust.
What are the objectives of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops?
The landlord, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST owns 19,000+ properties [worth over 4 BILLION (£4,000,000,000) + pounds in the prime locations across London - which are legally owned by the Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust.
YES, but who are all those Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust to whom we refer?
They are the 50,000 [fifty thousand] tenants of ‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) referred to by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as only mere ‘CUSTOMERS’ – no more. It sounds as if the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are referring to some kind of 50,000 [fifty thousand] illiterate, inarticulate ‘VEGETABLES’ who are wholly unaware of their immediate surroundings and who do not have any kind of brain, as if they are those who will never ever take effective action against the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST regarding the severe UNLAWFUL disrepair of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties and/or the confrontational, hostile, aggressive attitude of intimidation and harassment that is demonstrated regularly by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to the good tenants that raise legitimate complaints to the senior management.
Yet NO RESPONSE – AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN!
The only solution is the LEGAL solution - the COURTS.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST treat the tenants as: i) ‘VEGETABLES’, and to anyone who complains in writing, ii) Place a ‘PLANT’ next to the ‘VEGETABLE’. [The Psychological War carried out by Proxy/Others!]
If a good reasonable tenant raises legitimate complaints in writing, immediately, 2 (two) courses of action are initiated by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST:
i) Place the good tenant DELIBERATELY in PURPORTED RENT ARREARS [thank you local authority for your co-operation, do the local authority not deliberately INHIBIT or STOP the Housing Benefit for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST good respectable tenants?
As we all know, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are on first name terms with the Housing Department of the Local Authority and are they also not members of the same political party who support each other?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST supply the properties from their vastly expanding housing stock from unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM which washes through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION; whilst the housing authority of the local authority has the legal duty to house the various housing priority ‘cases’ and the local authority rely on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to provide the properties.
Does not the local authority feel obligated to comply with the requests of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to deliberately inhibit or stop a tenant’s Housing Benefit?
Yes – NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST manage people or ‘customers’ not houses!]; ii) place a ‘TENANT FROM HELL’ [a ‘PLANT’ placed next door to a good tenant.] [Is this not where ‘the CYRENIANS’ comes in particularly useful? – there is a contract that was entered into between ‘the CYRENIANS’ and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST for a considerable sum of money whereby the Charity called ‘THE CYRENIANS’ needs to house people with severe psychological problems, often with severe drug and anti–social tendencies, to place prospective tenants which are placed at the discretion of the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – ideally, as far as the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are concerned, to place unlawfully such tenants next door to the tenant who has raised legitimate complaints in writing? and iii) place the tenant in administrative isolation – then besiege the good tenant with local government and central government imperatives.
Do this – or else!
ISOLATE, DEMONISE and (try to) DISCREDIT?
This is where the astronomically expensive specifically designed NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST computer comes in useful!
This is where the Patrol Officers come in useful.
This is where the Tenant Officers come in useful.
All EVIL tactics done deliberately to intimidate and harass good tenants.
It never fails to amaze the wicked tactics NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can employ!
In the meantime, the management deliberately and UNLAWFULLY switch off the lights in the common parts of so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties of vulnerable tenants!
These are the actions of CRIMINALS.
The new RACHMANISM!
KEEP A DIARY.
Take the right LEGAL steps.
With ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ come ‘THE GHOSTS’.
Who are ‘THE GHOSTS’?
One NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant living in what was, until 4th May 2006, the ‘flagship’ Borough, the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (since 1968 – 38 years) was very recently unlawfully denied his vote. He was informed by specific individuals in authority that he did not live in a particular building. This was a deliberate lie. This was a deliberate deceit.
Yet specific individuals who are employees of the local authority of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham knowingly and unlawfully placed 4 (four) ‘GHOSTS’ in an empty flat which they knew was empty and the flat has only ever housed one adult, and under the postal vote, allowed four votes to be registered and recorded for that particular tiny flat. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham when informed of the reality and of the full facts, acted with surprising intransigence, inertia, complacency and hostility in not being prepared to remove ‘THE GHOSTS’. [Is it true that there is an identification number on the polling card so is it not possible for those in a position of authority to check how an individual voted? Is it still the case that Labour Party membership is an implied term of the employment contract for those employees employed within the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – and the only way for ensuring promotion for the senior officers of ‘the flagship’ Borough?]
If the tenant does not begin as a ‘VEGETABLE’, after careful initial screening by NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Tenant Questionnaire – then NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST place ‘PLANTS’ with psychological problems next to the carefully targeted tenant. Yes, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST house ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ in their properties – where all private landlords house REAL people with REAL feelings and REAL emotions. Indeed, if a good respectable tenant does not start as INCAPACITATED and VULNERABLE – the research department of social policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) together with the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST know how to incapacitate a good respectable tenant to the level of a passive ‘VEGETABLE’. Then they house ‘PLANTS’ and thereafter they seem intent to be determined to house ‘GHOSTS’.
[LSE is the college of London University from where Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair undertook her LLB law degree (before she undertook her Bar exams at Lincoln’s Inn as did TONY BLAIR). She met DERRY IRVINE (the part-time law lecturer) at LSE – who later put her and TONY BLAIR together [as pupils in his law chambers]. In 1994 on the Leader of the LABOUR PARTY, the Barrister, John Smith’s death, DERRY IRVINE arranged, through PETER MANDELSON, for TONY BLAIR to be the leader of the ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP, whom DERRY IRVINE [as Shadow Lord Chancellor, the latter day Cardinal Wolsey to the autocrat dictator, Henry VIII] believed he could control. Now MICHAEL LEVY (11/7/44) of Chase House, Nan Clarks Lane, at Mill Hill, London NW7 4HH believes the same.
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘THE LABOUR PROJECT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘TONY BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHERIE BOOTH/BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHEQUERS – AND ITS TENNIS COURT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of the ‘LABOUR PARTY TREASURY - DONATIONS or is it quasi ‘LOANS’ (with no intermediaries – TONY blackmailed?)?
So very easy for a good political party to be TOTALLY CORRUPTED?
TONY BLAIR nominated MICHAEL LEVY as Envoy in the Middle East (appointed on 14/5/2004).
Yet, is there not a slight question of a Conflict of Interest for him to be nominated as a British Envoy in the Middle East?
Does he have NO training in diplomacy?
Would he be accepted by both parties in the Middle East to broker a dispute, to be seen as Impartial?
Is there not also a question concerning ACCOUNTABILITY?
…and a question of TRANSPARENCY?
Who, after all, is the Official Treasurer of the LABOUR PARTY?
JACK DROMEY (21/9/1948) sits on the NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) of the LABOUR PARTY as (Official Labour Party) TREASURER – the husband of HARRIET HARMAN MP (20/7/1950) of 1 Winterbrook Road, London SE24 9HZ who is a LABOUR PARTY Minister in the Department of Constitutional Affairs (DCA) responsible for Elections and ‘Crown’ (the Illusion/Perception/not the Reality) matters (“How ironic ‘Harry’, seeing as you worked in Brent Law Centre as a solicitor and knowing so well your staunchly Republican views? We even spoke about them, in private…”) ‘under’ CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER (19/11/1951) of 34 Alwyne Road, London N1 2HW from Fountain Court Chambers (TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate) OR is the REAL Treasurer the UNOFFICIAL TREASURER (the qualified accountant – M&G Records etc.) MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY (who has direct access to the PRIME MINISTER with no intermediaries) – Mr LABOUR PARTY LORD ‘CASH-POINT’?]
WHY target VULNERABLE tenants?
To target vulnerable tenants is the most deliberate and evil scheme that any person or entity could activate in order to socially engineer an incapacitated vulnerable class which suffers daily STRESS, ANXIETY and ADVERSE HEALTH.
The LABOUR (PARTY) Government SOCIAL EXCLUSION DEPARTMENT maintains very close contact with NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the LSE and the ODPM Research Department.
SOCIAL EXCLUSION – this is no Freudian slip – this is DELIBERATE.
This is UNCONSCIONABLE!
This is WICKED!
This is VILE!
This is EVIL!
A genuine CARING COMMUNITY would focus on SOCIAL INCLUSION but NOT the LABOUR PARTY.
LABOUR are DEVIOUS
LABOUR are CONFRONTATIONAL
LABOUR are WICKED
LABOUR are EVIL
This was no mistake.
This coming week more vulnerable NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants will be deliberately targeted by the EVIL EMPIRE.
The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST waft off in a drunken or is it a smoked insensibility laughing to their exclusive wine bars in Hammersmith!
The more the Evil from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the more ‘THE (GOOD) HIDDEN HAND’ will knock out the Evil of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
If the EVIL is increased, this WILL result in the END of the Evil Empire.
Is this WISE?
We want BALANCE not POLARISATION in POLITICS!
BUT we will react – to the EVIL that attacks us.
We know who YOU ARE.
We know where YOU LIVE.
We know you are CORRUPT.
We know you DECEIVE.
We know you are out to SUBVERT DEMOCRACY.
We know you are out to SUBVERT the LAW!
So, the legal Beneficiaries of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are known by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST simply as mere ‘Customers’.
These so-called ‘Customers’ are not receiving ‘a service’ but are the unconditional and lawful inheritors of the Wills of the many testators and the Beneficiaries of substantial government largesse.
The pretext as an aim of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Charity is for “Key Workers”.
Why would “Key Workers” be the recipients or the cause of a Charitable Trust? Surely that does not fall within the scope of the 4 (four) classic heads of what does constitute a Charity. [The four heads of Charity being: i) Relief of Poverty, ii) Advancement of Education, iii) Advancement of Religion, iv) Other Purposes Beneficial to the Community, not falling under the other heads.]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) has paid some 24 BILLION [£24,000,000,000] of unaccountable taxpayers money through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION which falls under the responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable JOHN PRESCOTT, and such taxpayers money is then paid into REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) otherwise known as HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs).
The REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) or HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs)
are given their quality rating by the unaccountable and non-transparent entity called the AUDIT COMMISSION which also falls under the responsibility of the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). The responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable John Prescott.
The Department (ODPM) is described in independent authoritative reports as ‘dysfunctional’ and in a way that its management is ‘incompetent, and inefficient’ and acting like a ‘pantomime horse’, with a total ‘lack of accountability and waste.’
WHY?
In order to facilitate the provision of housing for non indigenous citizens who in their gratitude [MAY] vote for the LABOUR PARTY.
But what of the Indigenous citizens?
BLAIR, PRESCOTT, KELLY, SAWYER, SOLEY, RAYNSFORD, LEVY, POWELL (Jonathan, brother of Charles – and Dame Sally Ann (Vickers) Powell (2/10/1955) – ex Cabinet member of Regeneration on the Council of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham of 30 Coverdale Road, W12 8JL one of only 2 LABOUR PARTY Councillors on the National Executive Committee (NEC), wife of Iain Coleman the ex LABOUR PARTY MP for Hammersmith and Fulham), SLAUGHTER, LEMOS, DAVIES, appear to care not a Jot!
The Dysfunctional Dictator appears to care not one Iota.
Just HATE, GREED, HOSTILITY and WAR.
Has George Orwell’s (‘Eric Blair’) ‘1984’ arrived – the imagined date of the elective (evil) dictator (B.LIAR)?
‘The flagship’ Registered Social Landlord/Housing Association is NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
The records of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country] [a bastion and citadel that favours LABOUR PARTY policy] speak volumes, as do the records of ‘the flagship’ Borough in this country. The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that has doggedly supported the LABOUR PARTY [whatever the politics of central government and its OFFICERS continue today to doggedly pursue LABOUR PARTY policy]
Thursday, 4 May 2006 was a turning point across the country – LOCAL ELECTION TIME!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants ACTED decisively!
WHY?
Because
THE CHAIRMAN
THE DIRECTORS
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
THE COMPANY SECRETARY
Did they not all support the LABOUR PARTY?
The LABOUR PARTY showed, by their actions, that they hated ALL indigenous tenants.
The evidence indicates clearly that the LABOUR PARTY despise indigenous tenants.
The LABOUR PARTY despise patriotism. They try to call it “RACISM”.
The LABOUR PARTY wanted to destroy good respectable tenants who are British.
The LABOUR PARTY insist on MULTICULTURISM taking PRIORITY.
The work of the discredited GERARD LEMOS – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – revolved around social engineering - using NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants.
Similarly, the senior OFFICERS of the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM did they not also all support the LABOUR PARTY? The Implied Term of the Employment Contract?
Can the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM not unlawfully INHIBIT or stop the Housing Benefit of tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST when they want to, to the assent of their LABOUR PARTY friends at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, just as a tap of water is turned on so it can be turned off? The only difference is that ‘the water’ is not water but ‘Housing Benefit’, to pay rent for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST flats. Both the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are inter-connected.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can decide the Rent levels - £40 per week or £400 per week for the same studio/bedsit flat?
‘RENT RE-STRUCTURING’ has been imposed on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [if it wants to implement it - in its discretion] by the LABOUR PARTY which is a scam to massively increase rents to market rents to hit Council tenants and Registered Social Landlord (RSL)/Housing Association (HA) tenants.
This was ALL put in place by LABOUR PARTY LORD, CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER?
WHO IS HE?
Is he not TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate who lives in his own private home and his ex flat mate was TONY BLAIR who nominated him as LABOUR PARTY LORD CHANCELLOR – to place him in charge of all laws, all courts, all judges (their appointment, promotion and dismissal), all magistrates (their appointment and dismissal), all law officers (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) and all law staff (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) in the UK?
Oh, and he is in charge of the House of Lords as a Parliamentary Chamber (Legislature), the House of Lords as the highest Court of Appeal in the UK (Judiciary) and perhaps the most senior (and sane?) person in the Cabinet (Executive). With control over ALL three arms of Government! [And not forgetting, in charge of CROWN and CONSTITUTIONAL issues and has responsibility to oversee the three (3) British so-called places of lower taxation or ‘tax havens’ where Cherie (and Leo) have been known to enjoy the beach and the hospitality for good measure – all at taxpayers expense (staying ‘in private’ at Government House)? Is it not also a good place to organise some off-shore Banking, Cherie? Particularly in one of the Channel Islands (where no attempts have been made nor will ever be made to socially engineer any of the people – vulnerable or otherwise)? Why not educate TONY about REAL ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ (before it is too late?)!]
So much for TOTAL control of the Elective Dictatorship.
Similarly, Central Government is closely inter-related with Local Government. Is that not the reason why Jonathan Buchanan was nominated to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the man from the LABOUR Government Intelligence Service [whose duty it is to spy on others – as tenants of the Trust - at the will of the LABOUR Government] was he not ‘planted’ on to the Board of Directors/Trustees as a Director/Trustee?
Is that not why each and every Director/Trustee appointed to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a specific contribution to make in order to oversee the direction of the Evil LABOUR PARTY policies, in order to target good, respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who have raised legitimate complaints to the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
It is clear why there is no response.
It is clear why various agencies support NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST with enthusiasm!
This is all LABOUR PARTY B.LIARISM at its high water mark!
This is the LABOUR PARTY DESTRUCTION OF BRITISH DEMOCRACY at its high water mark!
This is ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP at its high water mark!
Is this not the way of DYSFUNCTIONAL cowards and bullies in Cabinet and in the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Board of Directors/Trustees at its high water mark?
We believe in the rule of LAW.
We believe in DEMOCRACY.
We believe in ACCOUNTABILITY.
We believe in TRANSPARENCY.
We believe that those who govern as ‘the AGENTS’ of us THE PEOPLE or ‘the PRINCIPALS’ – those ‘AGENTS’ can be removed at OUR WILL – and it SHALL be so!
Recently, on 27 April 2006 the Company Secretary of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP, acting on the advice of the Board of Directors/Trustees [are they not ‘the Puppets’ of the LABOUR political party?] attempted to seek the removal of legitimate truthful comments of good respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST posted across the Internet [in many world wide jurisdictions beamed in to the UK] in order to suppress the truth in an effort to try to compromise “freedom of speech” in a democratic and accountable society governed by the rule of law.
Ms IBIJOKE OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY is the Chartered Secretary to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP. She has been the Company Secretary since March 2004.
[The law might be different in Ms IBIJOKE ESO’s country of birth. An elective dictator may rule in her country of birth? She may not know about OUR rule of law? She may not know that “freedom of speech” is uppermost in a democratic and accountable society with transparent government, governed by the rule of law. The administrators in this country are our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’. Our elected representatives and their cohorts are also our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’!]
[Our Prime Minister has a LEGAL DUTY to be our ‘Servant’ of ‘the People’!]
Only one other company has Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ESO and her husband directed. But that company was obliged to be dissolved after just 3 (three) years.
WHY?
The husband of Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) is Mr OLADAPO OLADIPO ESO (1/3/1966).
But why would NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP appoint to the Board of Directors/Trustees a Company Secretary that is vastly inexperienced to run an entity with some 19,000 (nineteen thousand)+ properties worth over £4 BILLION [£4,000,000,000+] receiving unlimited unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM and its unaccountable entities?
Is it not easier to commit a CIVIL wrong [known as a TORT] or worse, a CRIMINAL WRONG [a CRIME] and the entity that commits or the entities that commit such a wrong is deemed to be a CRIMINAL [or CRIMINALS], by employing an inexperienced Company Secretary whose only claim to fame is to direct their own [husband and wife] company that has ended up in dissolution?
Is it reasonable for the major ‘flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in the UK to employ a massively INEXPERIENCED senior officer as COMPANY SECRETARY to run and to delegate the affairs of such a major entity to others?
What about the issues of Corporate Accountability?
What about the issues of Trust Accountability?
What about the issues of Transparency?
What about the issues of Consultation?
What about the issues of Good Communication?
What about the issues of Good Governance?
The evidence indicates NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a vehicle for:
i) Fraud,
ii) Deceit,
iii) Criminal activities,
iv) Unaccountability,
v) Non-Transparency,
vi) Third Class Management,
vii) The Perpetrator of Intimation and Harassment, and
viii) The Perpetrator of Major Breaches of Trust?
Is that why NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is hurriedly trying to re-brand the unaccountable entity?
Why no consultation?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP can not avoid legal liability for its many breaches of Trust.
The Company Secretary appears to come not from Europe but from foreign parts – in line with LABOUR PARTY dogma – to try to divide the British people and for an ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP to take control and to DICTATE?
Was this a wise course of action [for purely political individuals to impose political dogma in breach of Trust]?
Yet, there appear to be very good reasons for such a perverse policy which has nothing to do with good, accountable, transparent, governance, involving the pursuance of upholding LEGAL DUTIES of the vulnerable Beneficiaries. i.e. the 50,000 (fifty thousand) good, respectable tenants.
All the evidence - documentary, oral and real - suggests other reasons:
FRAUD?
GERRYMANDERING?
DECEIT?
CORRUPTION?
BREACHES OF TRUST?
ON AN ASTRONOMICAL SCALE?
THE ENRON OF THE UK?
Is it the case that NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP is nothing but a political sham – to gerrymander political constituencies for the next general election? All the evidence suggests that is the reality, as the perception is given by the so-called “Charity Shopper” who appears to be none other than a member of management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP? Otherwise, why would a person [“Charity Shopper”] incite the breaking of the law on the spurious ground of: “some picky reason that doesn’t really matter that much”?
This makes sense why so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP tenants are living in unlawful conditions and why they have to obtain Injunctions with a power of arrest, against NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST management, and even a power to arrest the Chief Executive of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, Ms KATE DAVIES.
No, “Charity Shopper”, upholding the law really does matter! As does, amongst other things, upholding trading standards, as does not trading with broken steps to trip up potential customers, as does breaking Tort law, as does breaking Contract law, as does breaking Consumer Protection and Fair Trading law, as does breaking Housing law, as does breaking Criminal law, as does breaking Charity law, as does breaking the very strict law of Trusts.
Try saying that to any NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant that upholding the law does not really matter, as NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country - with over £400 MILLION (£400,000,000+) of assets in cash lying dormant in reserve – why? - and the majority of the properties of the Trust are in a disgusting and UNLAWFUL condition not fit for human habitation, many properties are damp to the core and infested with vermin and UNLAWFULLY not fit to live in, with lights DELIBERATELY extinguished in the common parts of many of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties.
This fact is supported with overwhelming documentary evidence and witness statements from furious complaining tenants who are Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust that have been languishing in limbo. Too many tenants have made legitimate complaints to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and those incompetent and third rate senior management who act unlawfully to good respectable tenants do not even respond with an acknowledgement letter, whilst the poor tenants suffer and fester in slum properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that are unlawfully, yes, UNLAWFULLY in disrepair – the evidence is out there to be seen]. Stress, anxiety, and bad health of the good tenants deteriorate whilst the Personal Injury claim of the good respectable tenant increases in severity.
The next time a tenant - of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - is KILLED by a defective NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST heater after numerous complaints to the senior management - the response – nothing – remember, such deaths have happened before. This indicates a complicit senior management who act UNLAWFULLY. Therefore, think very carefully “Charity Shopper” or you too will be supporting and even inciting the growth of the new [Peter] RACHMAN or slum landlord [from NOTTING HILL] – who eventually ended up in front of the civil courts and the criminal courts [and he was sent down with a long custodial sentence - his name has become a byword for slums, lies and deception – not unlike the usual methods of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST]!
Take note, LABOUR PARTY DICTATORS THAT ARE THE ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP in the UK. The LABOUR PARTY DICTATIRS have been working on social engineering, as GERARD LEMOS [the ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST] who was assisted by the research undertaken by the LSE, which appears to go hand in hand with that conducted by the ex LABOUR PARTY Councillor of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM COUNCIL and later LABOUR PARTY Housing Minister NIC RAYNSFORD who has undertaken research on these issues, as has the ODPM. They know that the evidence is a MAJOR SCANDAL – it would discredit a banana (ELECTIVE) DICTATORSHIP (even the fourth richest country in the world)!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has become a byword for living in a slum supported by confrontational landlords who do not care to consult nor communicate as reasonable landlords.
The attempt to enslave us all under the elective dictatorship of the deeply flawed COMMUNIST inspired ideology of LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, PETER REDMAN, GERARD LEMOS, KATE DAVIES, NIC RAYNSFORD and their cohorts, as epitomised and underpinned by the blood RED flag and blood RED livery that abounds in, on and around ‘the flagship’ London Borough of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM which these past 38 [thirty eight] years [from 1968] has trampled over all our hard won freedoms, liberties and rights, destroyed by every hard left thinking LABOUR government, which was enthusiastically endorsed by ‘the flagship’ London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST was always carrying out Central Government diktat or more correctly the diktat regulated from GROVE HOUSE, 27 HAMMERSMITH GROVE, LONDON W6 OLJ, the REAL ‘SECRET’ Government entity, tucked discreetly away in the very heart of leafy Hammersmith [how DEVIOUSLY CLEVER]!
It appears that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is totally immune from prosecution?
Why was there no prosecution by the DPP when the 45+ exclusive properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that were held in Trust as part of the housing stock that were earmarked for vulnerable tenants were misappropriated and no prosecution was ever launched by the DPP for FRAUD?
WHY?
Who is the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) – head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) – the person responsible for determining which individual or entity to prosecute in this country [by the two basic tests:
i) the Evidential Test, and
ii) the Public Interest Test]?
Is the DPP not KEN MACDONALD?
Was KEN MACDONALD not the senior tenant of Matrix Chambers in Gray’s Inn, a very good friend of Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair?
Did not CHERIE BOOTH a.k.a. CHERIE BLAIR, recommend KEN MACDONALD to TONY B.LIAR as DPP? [Does not pillow talk work wonders?]
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST certainly has friends with platforms in the highest echelons – LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, LABOUR LORD, CLIVE SOLEY, LABOUR LORD, CHARLES FALCONER, LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR.
Just look at the composition of the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
There lies the clear evidence.
Ask again, what exactly is a Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ISO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY doing advising the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as Company Secretary?
On Thursday 4 May 2006, the blood RED flag and all it stands for FELL over the Town Halls of: i) Hammersmith, and ii) Fulham, in the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – ‘the flagship’ Borough in the UK.
Is it not an implied term of the contract of employment of all employees of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that all prospective employees of the London Borough are members of one extremely (symbolically RED) leaning political party?
Yet, make no mistake, we the tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are not stupid.
We do not want a hard LEFT wing government.
We do not want a hard RIGHT wing government.
We the vulnerable tenants want a BALANCE!
We want the door OPEN!
We want complete CONSULTATION.
Otherwise LABOUR – without the SUPPORT of vulnerable tenants - is consigned to the WILDERNESS!!!
WE WILL DECIDE WHAT WILL HAPPEN!!!
As from Thursday 4 May 2006, ‘the flagship’ London Borough of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham is comprised of 33 CONSERVATIVE Councillors and 13 LABOUR Councillors.
The Labour Party has been rocked to its core. The ‘flagship’ Borough has FALLEN!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, NEIL KINNOCK predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, CLIVE SOLEY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, MICHAEL LEVY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, NIC RAYNSFORD predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR predicted!
[There is ONE missing… the ‘4’ + the ‘3’!]
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS ALL thought.
Yet – all of them – were warned by ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that TOM SAWYER would be discredited.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that GERARD LEMOS would be discredited – so he was! He ran off to the People’s Republic of China with his ‘Little Red (COMMUNIST) Book’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that the flawed DYSFUNCTIONAL ex COMMUNIST CHARLES CLARKE and PATRICIA HEWITT would have to go – ‘BLACK WEDNESDAY’ proved ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ right!
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied ‘the FLAGSHIP’ London Borough would FALL – it DID!
BUT the stupid fools at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST would not LISTEN or ACT to SUPPORT vulnerable tenants or ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.
DISRESPECT vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ at your PERIL.
Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ can SUPPORT any POLITICAL PARTY.
Vulnerable tenants and ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ SUPPORTS VULNERABLE tenants.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a choice.
IT LEADS…! Do you remember those words - KD? They will come back to haunt you for EVER!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST will DEFINE ITS POSITION and thereby seal its FATE!
FOR GOOD or FOR EVIL???
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST unreasonably PLAYS with the lives of VULNERABLE tenants and treats VULNERABLE lives as mere ‘VEGETABLES’ – to try to DESTROY – ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ will employ its powerful two-edged sword…
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ never threatens.
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ WILL PROMISE and DELIVER on that promise...
add your comments
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST WICKED ABUSE
by john Sunday, May. 28, 2006 at 6:08 PM
CORPORATE INTELLIGENCE asserts:
[INLAND REVENUE REF: XN13652]
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ Shops are all part of one of the largest and most lucrative of ‘Charitable Trusts’ in this country.
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a Charitable TRUST, then why does it commit UNLAWFUL ACTS in relation to flagrantly breaching trading standards and clear, unambiguous, strict laws of this country, amongst others, breaches of the Misrepresentation Act 1967, the Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1979, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, the Trade Descriptions Act 1968, the Trade Descriptions Act 1972, and the Sale of Goods Act 1979?
The Sale of Goods Act 1979 asserts, amongst other things, that: i) In a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied condition that Goods must correspond to their description [Section 13(1)]; ii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied condition that Goods must be of merchantable quality [Section 14(2)]; iii) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business for a particular purpose, there is an implied condition that Goods supplied are reasonably fit for their purpose. [Section 14(3)]
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for IMPLIED TERMS in a Contract.
ALL these laws are some of the many laws that SUPPORT the vulnerable tenants:
i) Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998
ii) Protection from Harassment Act (PHA) 1997
iii) Protection from Eviction Act (PEA) 1977
iv) Criminal Law Act (CLA) 1977
v) Housing Act (HA) 1988
vi) Housing Act (HA) 2004
vii) Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998
Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) – the overriding objective is to enable the Court to deal with cases justly.
BASIC IMPLIED TERMS OF ANY TENANCY:
1. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD NOT TO DEROGATE (deprive) FROM THE GRANT (of the Tenancy)!
There is a STRICT obligation on the landlord not to DEROGATE [or deprive a Tenant] from the GRANT of an Assured Tenancy – the landlord must NOT do anything on the retained property by the Assured Tenant, so as to make the land that has been let to the Assured Tenant less fit for the particular purpose for which the letting was made. Yet, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has broken the tenancy contracts of too many tenants in CIVIL law and in CRIMINAL law. [BREACH OF CONTRACT – DAMAGES ARE IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT!]
2. COVENANT (agreement) BY LANDLORD of QUIET ENJOYMENT!
It is UNLAWFUL for the Landlord or his agent or any other person associated with the landlord to unlawfully intimidate or harass the tenant. [If not, immediately go to COURT!]
3. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY FIT FOR HUMAN HABITATION
The property let by the Landlord must be free from DAMP, INFESTATION of any kind, STRUCTURALLY SOUND, not a danger by its SECURITY or SAFETY and the COMMON PARTS MUST BE SAFE, WELL LIT, and any and ALL LIFTS IN GOOD WORKING ORDER, with a working phone in them, in case of break down. Fire appliances and fire safety equipment must be available throughout the property. No asbestos. No live wires (whether this is next to water leaks or not). It would be UNLAWFUL for the landlords to provide heaters that spew out CARBON MONOXIDE poison if th(is)ese fact/s ha(s)ve been notified to the landlords.
If the landlords promise to put the structure or fitted carpets or any essential part of the property in good order and fail to do so, this constitutes an ANICIPATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT! [DAMAGES are then OBTAINABLE!]
Proof of a breach makes the Landlord STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
4. LANDLORD MUST PROVIDE A PROPERTY THAT IS SUITABLE
If a Tenant suffers from CLAUSTROPHOBIA and/or the fear/stress compounded by or brought on by restricted spaces and/or this medical condition has been expressly asserted to the Landlord, the landlord MUST immediately take the necessary action or suffer the consequences accordingly. It is UNLAWFUL to provide a property that is NOT suitable for the particular tenant.
If a tenant is ‘dumped’ in a damp flat in massive disrepair and as a result, the tenant sustains severe pains and spasms due to the adverse, hostile, deliberate and vindictive acts of his landlords, the tenant accrues a LEGAL RIGHT of action against the landlord.
It becomes UNLAWFUL for the landlord NOT to take the necessary lawful action.
5. PROPERTY MUST BE SAFE
If a tenant suffers as a result of the landlord NOT taking the degree of care that a LAWFUL landlord would take, the landlord will be held STRICTLY LIABLE – STRICT LIABILITY.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY committed the following acts:
i) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up the windows of a tenant’s property,
ii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY bricked up a tenant’s easement to his garden,
iii) The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has UNLAWFULLY broken into a tenant’s flat not once - but twice - stealing the tenant’s files and deliberately and UNLAWFULLY causing criminal damage to the tenant’s personal locks and UNLAWFULLY committing break-ins and UNLAWFUL entry into the tenant’s flat. The second time the tenant photographed some of the management of the landlords committing CRIMINAL acts [COMMITTING CRIMES] by two cameras, whereby the management were identified as tooled up with offensive weapons and after following the management back to the staff entrance of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST where other management were waiting to receive the CRIMINAL MANAGEMENT [to try to subvert the evidence?] the tenant thereafter was immediately granted a High Court Injunction and the High Court Judge saw evidence of the RACHMAN methods perpetrated by the EVIL landlord. Next time it was stated IT WILL BE immediate PRISON - even For The CHIEF EXECUTIVE!
The two latest UNLAWFUL matters, the tenants obtained an Injunction against the management and against the Chief Executive [KATE DAVIES] of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who acted in a CRIMINAL way, after she was notified of the first UNLAWFUL Break-In by RECORDED DELIVERY and by FAX. The Injunction asserts that the CHIEF EXECUTIVE [(THE EVIL) KATE DAVIES] can be: i) IMPRISONED, ii) FINED and/or iii) HAVE HER ASSETS SEIZED, if she commits and/or incites through her management, once again: a) the tampering of the Assured Tenant’s electricity [so that the Tenant is obliged ‘to crawl on his hands and knees’ [this appeared in the local newspaper (dated Friday April 28, 2006 – the very week before the LOCAL ELECTIONS on Thursday, 4 May 2006)] in order to get in or get out of his flat], b) the tampering of the tenant’s water supply, and/or c) the theft of the tenant’s own personal or official mail.
How could anyone be so EVIL and so WICKED to vulnerable tenants?
The documentary evidence speaks volumes.
[Did the Chief Executive do the same at SERVITE HOUSES – as Chief Executive?]
[Ex turpi causa non oritur actio - No cause of action may be founded upon an IMMORAL or ILLEGAL act.]
All these matters NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have been known to have breached.
All of these breaches are UNLAWFUL.
As the photograph above indicates, the entrances to some of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops are DANGEROUS and can cause injuries. This is also UNLAWFUL.
It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to exclude liability for DEATH and/or PERSONAL INJURY. [Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, Section 2(1)]
Would you really want to sustain a serious injury in order to part with your hard earned money in order to consider ‘throwing away’ your hard earned money to a highly questionable ‘Charitable’ cause?
Do the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops still exist or have they been re-branded? Is this WRONGFUL TRADING? Is this FRAUDULENT TRADING?
It is known of at least 2 (TWO) good, pleasant, sociable, respectable and extremely honourable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who complained in writing to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST about the very DANGEROUS defects in their homes which were the legal responsibility of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST which not only allowed but INCITED breaches of the strict LEGAL DUTY OF CARE to be UNLAWFULLY caused by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and this breach of the lawful duty of care CAUSED the DEATHS of at least 2 (TWO) good, respectable Tenants.
As a result of the NEGLIGENT/RECKLESS action of the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the good respectable tenants were to die [yes, DIE] UNLAWFULLY.
Were they killed?
They certainly DIED.
Both DIED cursing [yes, CURSING. I know, as I have the evidence] NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and its senior management are EVIL beyond measure.
The senior management, acting with gay abandon [as under the authority of GERARD LEMOS (yes, him of 7 BISHAM GARDENS, HIGHGATE) – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Government Race Adviser – Commissioner of the Audit Commission – Commissioner of the Civil Service – Deputy Chairman of the British Council – all nominated by LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER (yes, him of 22 INCHMERY ROAD, CATFORD), ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and before that ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY and before that, head of the NATIONAL UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES (NUPE) being in a position of responsibility for Central Government and Local Government employees – now known as UNISON UNION, and then his nominations were automatically appointed by LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR – yes, TOM SAWYER, as the representative of the workers has to be ‘on board’], wafts on with no communication to tenants who are also Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust, where the management act with confrontation, a lack of consultation, hostility, intimidation and harassment, oblivious to the grave concerns and legal consequences that mount on a daily basis.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a LEGAL DUTY to adhere strictly to Trust law. If it does not, any Beneficiary of the Charitable Trust can immediately apply to the Court to initiate an action in Breach of Trust.
What are the objectives of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ‘Charity’ shops?
The landlord, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST owns 19,000+ properties [worth over 4 BILLION (£4,000,000,000) + pounds in the prime locations across London - which are legally owned by the Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust.
YES, but who are all those Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust to whom we refer?
They are the 50,000 [fifty thousand] tenants of ‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) referred to by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as only mere ‘CUSTOMERS’ – no more. It sounds as if the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are referring to some kind of 50,000 [fifty thousand] illiterate, inarticulate ‘VEGETABLES’ who are wholly unaware of their immediate surroundings and who do not have any kind of brain, as if they are those who will never ever take effective action against the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST regarding the severe UNLAWFUL disrepair of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties and/or the confrontational, hostile, aggressive attitude of intimidation and harassment that is demonstrated regularly by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to the good tenants that raise legitimate complaints to the senior management.
Yet NO RESPONSE – AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN!
The only solution is the LEGAL solution - the COURTS.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST treat the tenants as: i) ‘VEGETABLES’, and to anyone who complains in writing, ii) Place a ‘PLANT’ next to the ‘VEGETABLE’. [The Psychological War carried out by Proxy/Others!]
If a good reasonable tenant raises legitimate complaints in writing, immediately, 2 (two) courses of action are initiated by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST:
i) Place the good tenant DELIBERATELY in PURPORTED RENT ARREARS [thank you local authority for your co-operation, do the local authority not deliberately INHIBIT or STOP the Housing Benefit for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST good respectable tenants?
As we all know, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are on first name terms with the Housing Department of the Local Authority and are they also not members of the same political party who support each other?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST supply the properties from their vastly expanding housing stock from unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM which washes through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION; whilst the housing authority of the local authority has the legal duty to house the various housing priority ‘cases’ and the local authority rely on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to provide the properties.
Does not the local authority feel obligated to comply with the requests of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to deliberately inhibit or stop a tenant’s Housing Benefit?
Yes – NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST manage people or ‘customers’ not houses!]; ii) place a ‘TENANT FROM HELL’ [a ‘PLANT’ placed next door to a good tenant.] [Is this not where ‘the CYRENIANS’ comes in particularly useful? – there is a contract that was entered into between ‘the CYRENIANS’ and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST for a considerable sum of money whereby the Charity called ‘THE CYRENIANS’ needs to house people with severe psychological problems, often with severe drug and anti–social tendencies, to place prospective tenants which are placed at the discretion of the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – ideally, as far as the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are concerned, to place unlawfully such tenants next door to the tenant who has raised legitimate complaints in writing? and iii) place the tenant in administrative isolation – then besiege the good tenant with local government and central government imperatives.
Do this – or else!
ISOLATE, DEMONISE and (try to) DISCREDIT?
This is where the astronomically expensive specifically designed NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST computer comes in useful!
This is where the Patrol Officers come in useful.
This is where the Tenant Officers come in useful.
All EVIL tactics done deliberately to intimidate and harass good tenants.
It never fails to amaze the wicked tactics NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can employ!
In the meantime, the management deliberately and UNLAWFULLY switch off the lights in the common parts of so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties of vulnerable tenants!
These are the actions of CRIMINALS.
The new RACHMANISM!
KEEP A DIARY.
Take the right LEGAL steps.
With ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ come ‘THE GHOSTS’.
Who are ‘THE GHOSTS’?
One NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant living in what was, until 4th May 2006, the ‘flagship’ Borough, the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham (since 1968 – 38 years) was very recently unlawfully denied his vote. He was informed by specific individuals in authority that he did not live in a particular building. This was a deliberate lie. This was a deliberate deceit.
Yet specific individuals who are employees of the local authority of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham knowingly and unlawfully placed 4 (four) ‘GHOSTS’ in an empty flat which they knew was empty and the flat has only ever housed one adult, and under the postal vote, allowed four votes to be registered and recorded for that particular tiny flat. The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham when informed of the reality and of the full facts, acted with surprising intransigence, inertia, complacency and hostility in not being prepared to remove ‘THE GHOSTS’. [Is it true that there is an identification number on the polling card so is it not possible for those in a position of authority to check how an individual voted? Is it still the case that Labour Party membership is an implied term of the employment contract for those employees employed within the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – and the only way for ensuring promotion for the senior officers of ‘the flagship’ Borough?]
If the tenant does not begin as a ‘VEGETABLE’, after careful initial screening by NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the Tenant Questionnaire – then NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST place ‘PLANTS’ with psychological problems next to the carefully targeted tenant. Yes, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST house ‘VEGETABLES’ and ‘PLANTS’ in their properties – where all private landlords house REAL people with REAL feelings and REAL emotions. Indeed, if a good respectable tenant does not start as INCAPACITATED and VULNERABLE – the research department of social policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) together with the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST know how to incapacitate a good respectable tenant to the level of a passive ‘VEGETABLE’. Then they house ‘PLANTS’ and thereafter they seem intent to be determined to house ‘GHOSTS’.
[LSE is the college of London University from where Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair undertook her LLB law degree (before she undertook her Bar exams at Lincoln’s Inn as did TONY BLAIR). She met DERRY IRVINE (the part-time law lecturer) at LSE – who later put her and TONY BLAIR together [as pupils in his law chambers]. In 1994 on the Leader of the LABOUR PARTY, the Barrister, John Smith’s death, DERRY IRVINE arranged, through PETER MANDELSON, for TONY BLAIR to be the leader of the ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP, whom DERRY IRVINE [as Shadow Lord Chancellor, the latter day Cardinal Wolsey to the autocrat dictator, Henry VIII] believed he could control. Now MICHAEL LEVY (11/7/44) of Chase House, Nan Clarks Lane, at Mill Hill, London NW7 4HH believes the same.
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘THE LABOUR PROJECT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘TONY BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHERIE BOOTH/BLAIR’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of ‘CHEQUERS – AND ITS TENNIS COURT’?
Did he not inveigle himself into the very heart of the ‘LABOUR PARTY TREASURY - DONATIONS or is it quasi ‘LOANS’ (with no intermediaries – TONY blackmailed?)?
So very easy for a good political party to be TOTALLY CORRUPTED?
TONY BLAIR nominated MICHAEL LEVY as Envoy in the Middle East (appointed on 14/5/2004).
Yet, is there not a slight question of a Conflict of Interest for him to be nominated as a British Envoy in the Middle East?
Does he have NO training in diplomacy?
Would he be accepted by both parties in the Middle East to broker a dispute, to be seen as Impartial?
Is there not also a question concerning ACCOUNTABILITY?
…and a question of TRANSPARENCY?
Who, after all, is the Official Treasurer of the LABOUR PARTY?
JACK DROMEY (21/9/1948) sits on the NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) of the LABOUR PARTY as (Official Labour Party) TREASURER – the husband of HARRIET HARMAN MP (20/7/1950) of 1 Winterbrook Road, London SE24 9HZ who is a LABOUR PARTY Minister in the Department of Constitutional Affairs (DCA) responsible for Elections and ‘Crown’ (the Illusion/Perception/not the Reality) matters (“How ironic ‘Harry’, seeing as you worked in Brent Law Centre as a solicitor and knowing so well your staunchly Republican views? We even spoke about them, in private…”) ‘under’ CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER (19/11/1951) of 34 Alwyne Road, London N1 2HW from Fountain Court Chambers (TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate) OR is the REAL Treasurer the UNOFFICIAL TREASURER (the qualified accountant – M&G Records etc.) MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY (who has direct access to the PRIME MINISTER with no intermediaries) – Mr LABOUR PARTY LORD ‘CASH-POINT’?]
WHY target VULNERABLE tenants?
To target vulnerable tenants is the most deliberate and evil scheme that any person or entity could activate in order to socially engineer an incapacitated vulnerable class which suffers daily STRESS, ANXIETY and ADVERSE HEALTH.
The LABOUR (PARTY) Government SOCIAL EXCLUSION DEPARTMENT maintains very close contact with NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, the LSE and the ODPM Research Department.
SOCIAL EXCLUSION – this is no Freudian slip – this is DELIBERATE.
This is UNCONSCIONABLE!
This is WICKED!
This is VILE!
This is EVIL!
A genuine CARING COMMUNITY would focus on SOCIAL INCLUSION but NOT the LABOUR PARTY.
LABOUR are DEVIOUS
LABOUR are CONFRONTATIONAL
LABOUR are WICKED
LABOUR are EVIL
This was no mistake.
This coming week more vulnerable NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants will be deliberately targeted by the EVIL EMPIRE.
The management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST waft off in a drunken or is it a smoked insensibility laughing to their exclusive wine bars in Hammersmith!
The more the Evil from NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the more ‘THE (GOOD) HIDDEN HAND’ will knock out the Evil of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
If the EVIL is increased, this WILL result in the END of the Evil Empire.
Is this WISE?
We want BALANCE not POLARISATION in POLITICS!
BUT we will react – to the EVIL that attacks us.
We know who YOU ARE.
We know where YOU LIVE.
We know you are CORRUPT.
We know you DECEIVE.
We know you are out to SUBVERT DEMOCRACY.
We know you are out to SUBVERT the LAW!
So, the legal Beneficiaries of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are known by the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST simply as mere ‘Customers’.
These so-called ‘Customers’ are not receiving ‘a service’ but are the unconditional and lawful inheritors of the Wills of the many testators and the Beneficiaries of substantial government largesse.
The pretext as an aim of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Charity is for “Key Workers”.
Why would “Key Workers” be the recipients or the cause of a Charitable Trust? Surely that does not fall within the scope of the 4 (four) classic heads of what does constitute a Charity. [The four heads of Charity being: i) Relief of Poverty, ii) Advancement of Education, iii) Advancement of Religion, iv) Other Purposes Beneficial to the Community, not falling under the other heads.]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) has paid some 24 BILLION [£24,000,000,000] of unaccountable taxpayers money through the unaccountable HOUSING CORPORATION which falls under the responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable JOHN PRESCOTT, and such taxpayers money is then paid into REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) otherwise known as HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs).
The REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORDS (RSLs) or HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS (HAs)
are given their quality rating by the unaccountable and non-transparent entity called the AUDIT COMMISSION which also falls under the responsibility of the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). The responsibility of the Right (Dis)Honourable John Prescott.
The Department (ODPM) is described in independent authoritative reports as ‘dysfunctional’ and in a way that its management is ‘incompetent, and inefficient’ and acting like a ‘pantomime horse’, with a total ‘lack of accountability and waste.’
WHY?
In order to facilitate the provision of housing for non indigenous citizens who in their gratitude [MAY] vote for the LABOUR PARTY.
But what of the Indigenous citizens?
BLAIR, PRESCOTT, KELLY, SAWYER, SOLEY, RAYNSFORD, LEVY, POWELL (Jonathan, brother of Charles – and Dame Sally Ann (Vickers) Powell (2/10/1955) – ex Cabinet member of Regeneration on the Council of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham of 30 Coverdale Road, W12 8JL one of only 2 LABOUR PARTY Councillors on the National Executive Committee (NEC), wife of Iain Coleman the ex LABOUR PARTY MP for Hammersmith and Fulham), SLAUGHTER, LEMOS, DAVIES, appear to care not a Jot!
The Dysfunctional Dictator appears to care not one Iota.
Just HATE, GREED, HOSTILITY and WAR.
Has George Orwell’s (‘Eric Blair’) ‘1984’ arrived – the imagined date of the elective (evil) dictator (B.LIAR)?
‘The flagship’ Registered Social Landlord/Housing Association is NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
The records of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country] [a bastion and citadel that favours LABOUR PARTY policy] speak volumes, as do the records of ‘the flagship’ Borough in this country. The London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that has doggedly supported the LABOUR PARTY [whatever the politics of central government and its OFFICERS continue today to doggedly pursue LABOUR PARTY policy]
Thursday, 4 May 2006 was a turning point across the country – LOCAL ELECTION TIME!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants ACTED decisively!
WHY?
Because
THE CHAIRMAN
THE DIRECTORS
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
THE COMPANY SECRETARY
Did they not all support the LABOUR PARTY?
The LABOUR PARTY showed, by their actions, that they hated ALL indigenous tenants.
The evidence indicates clearly that the LABOUR PARTY despise indigenous tenants.
The LABOUR PARTY despise patriotism. They try to call it “RACISM”.
The LABOUR PARTY wanted to destroy good respectable tenants who are British.
The LABOUR PARTY insist on MULTICULTURISM taking PRIORITY.
The work of the discredited GERARD LEMOS – ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – revolved around social engineering - using NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenants.
Similarly, the senior OFFICERS of the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM did they not also all support the LABOUR PARTY? The Implied Term of the Employment Contract?
Can the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM not unlawfully INHIBIT or stop the Housing Benefit of tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST when they want to, to the assent of their LABOUR PARTY friends at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, just as a tap of water is turned on so it can be turned off? The only difference is that ‘the water’ is not water but ‘Housing Benefit’, to pay rent for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST flats. Both the London Borough of HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are inter-connected.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST can decide the Rent levels - £40 per week or £400 per week for the same studio/bedsit flat?
‘RENT RE-STRUCTURING’ has been imposed on NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [if it wants to implement it - in its discretion] by the LABOUR PARTY which is a scam to massively increase rents to market rents to hit Council tenants and Registered Social Landlord (RSL)/Housing Association (HA) tenants.
This was ALL put in place by LABOUR PARTY LORD, CHARLES LESLIE FALCONER?
WHO IS HE?
Is he not TONY BLAIR’s ex flat mate who lives in his own private home and his ex flat mate was TONY BLAIR who nominated him as LABOUR PARTY LORD CHANCELLOR – to place him in charge of all laws, all courts, all judges (their appointment, promotion and dismissal), all magistrates (their appointment and dismissal), all law officers (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) and all law staff (their appointment, promotion and dismissal) in the UK?
Oh, and he is in charge of the House of Lords as a Parliamentary Chamber (Legislature), the House of Lords as the highest Court of Appeal in the UK (Judiciary) and perhaps the most senior (and sane?) person in the Cabinet (Executive). With control over ALL three arms of Government! [And not forgetting, in charge of CROWN and CONSTITUTIONAL issues and has responsibility to oversee the three (3) British so-called places of lower taxation or ‘tax havens’ where Cherie (and Leo) have been known to enjoy the beach and the hospitality for good measure – all at taxpayers expense (staying ‘in private’ at Government House)? Is it not also a good place to organise some off-shore Banking, Cherie? Particularly in one of the Channel Islands (where no attempts have been made nor will ever be made to socially engineer any of the people – vulnerable or otherwise)? Why not educate TONY about REAL ‘HUMAN RIGHTS’ (before it is too late?)!]
So much for TOTAL control of the Elective Dictatorship.
Similarly, Central Government is closely inter-related with Local Government. Is that not the reason why Jonathan Buchanan was nominated to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST – the man from the LABOUR Government Intelligence Service [whose duty it is to spy on others – as tenants of the Trust - at the will of the LABOUR Government] was he not ‘planted’ on to the Board of Directors/Trustees as a Director/Trustee?
Is that not why each and every Director/Trustee appointed to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a specific contribution to make in order to oversee the direction of the Evil LABOUR PARTY policies, in order to target good, respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST who have raised legitimate complaints to the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
It is clear why there is no response.
It is clear why various agencies support NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST with enthusiasm!
This is all LABOUR PARTY B.LIARISM at its high water mark!
This is the LABOUR PARTY DESTRUCTION OF BRITISH DEMOCRACY at its high water mark!
This is ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP at its high water mark!
Is this not the way of DYSFUNCTIONAL cowards and bullies in Cabinet and in the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Board of Directors/Trustees at its high water mark?
We believe in the rule of LAW.
We believe in DEMOCRACY.
We believe in ACCOUNTABILITY.
We believe in TRANSPARENCY.
We believe that those who govern as ‘the AGENTS’ of us THE PEOPLE or ‘the PRINCIPALS’ – those ‘AGENTS’ can be removed at OUR WILL – and it SHALL be so!
Recently, on 27 April 2006 the Company Secretary of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP, acting on the advice of the Board of Directors/Trustees [are they not ‘the Puppets’ of the LABOUR political party?] attempted to seek the removal of legitimate truthful comments of good respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST posted across the Internet [in many world wide jurisdictions beamed in to the UK] in order to suppress the truth in an effort to try to compromise “freedom of speech” in a democratic and accountable society governed by the rule of law.
Ms IBIJOKE OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY is the Chartered Secretary to the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP. She has been the Company Secretary since March 2004.
[The law might be different in Ms IBIJOKE ESO’s country of birth. An elective dictator may rule in her country of birth? She may not know about OUR rule of law? She may not know that “freedom of speech” is uppermost in a democratic and accountable society with transparent government, governed by the rule of law. The administrators in this country are our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’. Our elected representatives and their cohorts are also our ‘Servants’ of ‘the People’!]
[Our Prime Minister has a LEGAL DUTY to be our ‘Servant’ of ‘the People’!]
Only one other company has Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ESO and her husband directed. But that company was obliged to be dissolved after just 3 (three) years.
WHY?
The husband of Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) OLOLADE ESO (15/3/1970) is Mr OLADAPO OLADIPO ESO (1/3/1966).
But why would NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP appoint to the Board of Directors/Trustees a Company Secretary that is vastly inexperienced to run an entity with some 19,000 (nineteen thousand)+ properties worth over £4 BILLION [£4,000,000,000+] receiving unlimited unaccountable taxpayers money from the ODPM and its unaccountable entities?
Is it not easier to commit a CIVIL wrong [known as a TORT] or worse, a CRIMINAL WRONG [a CRIME] and the entity that commits or the entities that commit such a wrong is deemed to be a CRIMINAL [or CRIMINALS], by employing an inexperienced Company Secretary whose only claim to fame is to direct their own [husband and wife] company that has ended up in dissolution?
Is it reasonable for the major ‘flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in the UK to employ a massively INEXPERIENCED senior officer as COMPANY SECRETARY to run and to delegate the affairs of such a major entity to others?
What about the issues of Corporate Accountability?
What about the issues of Trust Accountability?
What about the issues of Transparency?
What about the issues of Consultation?
What about the issues of Good Communication?
What about the issues of Good Governance?
The evidence indicates NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is a vehicle for:
i) Fraud,
ii) Deceit,
iii) Criminal activities,
iv) Unaccountability,
v) Non-Transparency,
vi) Third Class Management,
vii) The Perpetrator of Intimation and Harassment, and
viii) The Perpetrator of Major Breaches of Trust?
Is that why NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is hurriedly trying to re-brand the unaccountable entity?
Why no consultation?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP can not avoid legal liability for its many breaches of Trust.
The Company Secretary appears to come not from Europe but from foreign parts – in line with LABOUR PARTY dogma – to try to divide the British people and for an ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP to take control and to DICTATE?
Was this a wise course of action [for purely political individuals to impose political dogma in breach of Trust]?
Yet, there appear to be very good reasons for such a perverse policy which has nothing to do with good, accountable, transparent, governance, involving the pursuance of upholding LEGAL DUTIES of the vulnerable Beneficiaries. i.e. the 50,000 (fifty thousand) good, respectable tenants.
All the evidence - documentary, oral and real - suggests other reasons:
FRAUD?
GERRYMANDERING?
DECEIT?
CORRUPTION?
BREACHES OF TRUST?
ON AN ASTRONOMICAL SCALE?
THE ENRON OF THE UK?
Is it the case that NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP is nothing but a political sham – to gerrymander political constituencies for the next general election? All the evidence suggests that is the reality, as the perception is given by the so-called “Charity Shopper” who appears to be none other than a member of management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP? Otherwise, why would a person [“Charity Shopper”] incite the breaking of the law on the spurious ground of: “some picky reason that doesn’t really matter that much”?
This makes sense why so many NOTTING HILL HOUSING GROUP tenants are living in unlawful conditions and why they have to obtain Injunctions with a power of arrest, against NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST management, and even a power to arrest the Chief Executive of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, Ms KATE DAVIES.
No, “Charity Shopper”, upholding the law really does matter! As does, amongst other things, upholding trading standards, as does not trading with broken steps to trip up potential customers, as does breaking Tort law, as does breaking Contract law, as does breaking Consumer Protection and Fair Trading law, as does breaking Housing law, as does breaking Criminal law, as does breaking Charity law, as does breaking the very strict law of Trusts.
Try saying that to any NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant that upholding the law does not really matter, as NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [‘the flagship’ Registered Social Landlord (RSL) in this country - with over £400 MILLION (£400,000,000+) of assets in cash lying dormant in reserve – why? - and the majority of the properties of the Trust are in a disgusting and UNLAWFUL condition not fit for human habitation, many properties are damp to the core and infested with vermin and UNLAWFULLY not fit to live in, with lights DELIBERATELY extinguished in the common parts of many of the NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST properties.
This fact is supported with overwhelming documentary evidence and witness statements from furious complaining tenants who are Beneficiaries of a Charitable Trust that have been languishing in limbo. Too many tenants have made legitimate complaints to the senior management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and those incompetent and third rate senior management who act unlawfully to good respectable tenants do not even respond with an acknowledgement letter, whilst the poor tenants suffer and fester in slum properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that are unlawfully, yes, UNLAWFULLY in disrepair – the evidence is out there to be seen]. Stress, anxiety, and bad health of the good tenants deteriorate whilst the Personal Injury claim of the good respectable tenant increases in severity.
The next time a tenant - of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - is KILLED by a defective NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST heater after numerous complaints to the senior management - the response – nothing – remember, such deaths have happened before. This indicates a complicit senior management who act UNLAWFULLY. Therefore, think very carefully “Charity Shopper” or you too will be supporting and even inciting the growth of the new [Peter] RACHMAN or slum landlord [from NOTTING HILL] – who eventually ended up in front of the civil courts and the criminal courts [and he was sent down with a long custodial sentence - his name has become a byword for slums, lies and deception – not unlike the usual methods of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST]!
Take note, LABOUR PARTY DICTATORS THAT ARE THE ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP in the UK. The LABOUR PARTY DICTATIRS have been working on social engineering, as GERARD LEMOS [the ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST] who was assisted by the research undertaken by the LSE, which appears to go hand in hand with that conducted by the ex LABOUR PARTY Councillor of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM COUNCIL and later LABOUR PARTY Housing Minister NIC RAYNSFORD who has undertaken research on these issues, as has the ODPM. They know that the evidence is a MAJOR SCANDAL – it would discredit a banana (ELECTIVE) DICTATORSHIP (even the fourth richest country in the world)!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has become a byword for living in a slum supported by confrontational landlords who do not care to consult nor communicate as reasonable landlords.
The attempt to enslave us all under the elective dictatorship of the deeply flawed COMMUNIST inspired ideology of LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, PETER REDMAN, GERARD LEMOS, KATE DAVIES, NIC RAYNSFORD and their cohorts, as epitomised and underpinned by the blood RED flag and blood RED livery that abounds in, on and around ‘the flagship’ London Borough of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM which these past 38 [thirty eight] years [from 1968] has trampled over all our hard won freedoms, liberties and rights, destroyed by every hard left thinking LABOUR government, which was enthusiastically endorsed by ‘the flagship’ London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST was always carrying out Central Government diktat or more correctly the diktat regulated from GROVE HOUSE, 27 HAMMERSMITH GROVE, LONDON W6 OLJ, the REAL ‘SECRET’ Government entity, tucked discreetly away in the very heart of leafy Hammersmith [how DEVIOUSLY CLEVER]!
It appears that NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is totally immune from prosecution?
Why was there no prosecution by the DPP when the 45+ exclusive properties of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that were held in Trust as part of the housing stock that were earmarked for vulnerable tenants were misappropriated and no prosecution was ever launched by the DPP for FRAUD?
WHY?
Who is the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) – head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) – the person responsible for determining which individual or entity to prosecute in this country [by the two basic tests:
i) the Evidential Test, and
ii) the Public Interest Test]?
Is the DPP not KEN MACDONALD?
Was KEN MACDONALD not the senior tenant of Matrix Chambers in Gray’s Inn, a very good friend of Cherie Booth/Cherie Blair?
Did not CHERIE BOOTH a.k.a. CHERIE BLAIR, recommend KEN MACDONALD to TONY B.LIAR as DPP? [Does not pillow talk work wonders?]
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST certainly has friends with platforms in the highest echelons – LABOUR LORD, TOM SAWYER, LABOUR LORD, CLIVE SOLEY, LABOUR LORD, CHARLES FALCONER, LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR.
Just look at the composition of the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
There lies the clear evidence.
Ask again, what exactly is a Ms IBI(JOKE – a JOKE?) ISO (15/3/1970) of 160 Norfolk Crescent, Sidcup, Kent DA15 8HY doing advising the Board of Directors/Trustees of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as Company Secretary?
On Thursday 4 May 2006, the blood RED flag and all it stands for FELL over the Town Halls of: i) Hammersmith, and ii) Fulham, in the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham – ‘the flagship’ Borough in the UK.
Is it not an implied term of the contract of employment of all employees of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham that all prospective employees of the London Borough are members of one extremely (symbolically RED) leaning political party?
Yet, make no mistake, we the tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST are not stupid.
We do not want a hard LEFT wing government.
We do not want a hard RIGHT wing government.
We the vulnerable tenants want a BALANCE!
We want the door OPEN!
We want complete CONSULTATION.
Otherwise LABOUR – without the SUPPORT of vulnerable tenants - is consigned to the WILDERNESS!!!
WE WILL DECIDE WHAT WILL HAPPEN!!!
As from Thursday 4 May 2006, ‘the flagship’ London Borough of the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham is comprised of 33 CONSERVATIVE Councillors and 13 LABOUR Councillors.
The Labour Party has been rocked to its core. The ‘flagship’ Borough has FALLEN!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, TOM SAWYER predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, NEIL KINNOCK predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, CLIVE SOLEY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY LORD, MICHAEL LEVY predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, NIC RAYNSFORD predicted!
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, TONY BLAIR predicted!
[There is ONE missing… the ‘4’ + the ‘3’!]
Worse, far worse than LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS ALL thought.
Yet – all of them – were warned by ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that TOM SAWYER would be discredited.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that GERARD LEMOS would be discredited – so he was! He ran off to the People’s Republic of China with his ‘Little Red (COMMUNIST) Book’.
Just as ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied that the flawed DYSFUNCTIONAL ex COMMUNIST CHARLES CLARKE and PATRICIA HEWITT would have to go – ‘BLACK WEDNESDAY’ proved ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ right!
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ prophesied ‘the FLAGSHIP’ London Borough would FALL – it DID!
BUT the stupid fools at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST would not LISTEN or ACT to SUPPORT vulnerable tenants.
DISRESPECT vulnerable tenants at your PERIL.
Vulnerable tenants can SUPPORT any POLITICAL PARTY.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has a choice.
IT LEADS…! Do you remember those words - KD? They will come back to haunt you for EVER!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST will DEFINE ITS POSITION and thereby seal its FATE!
FOR GOOD or FOR EVIL???
If NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST unreasonably PLAYS with the lives of VULNERABLE tenants and treats VULNERABLE lives as mere ‘VEGETABLES’ – to try to DESTROY – ‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ will employ its powerful two-edged sword…
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ never threatens.
‘THE HIDDEN HAND’ WILL PROMISE and DELIVER on that promise...
John
e-mail:
john_smith_mail@hotmail.com
Negligence
24.06.2006 02:37
Andy
Servite Houses and Mr Blair ( does every trust shake hands with the P.M.?)
30.06.2006 11:48
IT IS A SHAME MR FOX/SERVITES DO NOT INVITE HIM TO VISIT THIS GHOVEL I RENT FROM SERVITES at near 100 pound a week rent!!! And these 'trust' places are supposed to be for folks on low income!!!!!
THE TEXT OF WHAT I READ:
"The Prime Minister inspected a closed-down drugs den at Church Manor estate in Lambeth on Thursday last week, where he saw first-hand how Servite are working with neighbourhood police teams to help tackle serious crime.
He chatted with Servite staff and residents and members of the local police Safer Neighbourhood teams.
“He was really interested in what we are doing to tackle anti social behaviour and how the government can do more to help,” said Katrina Robinson, Legal Services Manager at Servite.
Katrina told the PM about her ideas for a database of tenants guilty of anti social behaviour that could be shared between local authorities and housing associations. It would help make sure tenants have always received the right kind of rehabilitation and are offered the right kinds of tenancies. He was so impressed he asked her to write all the ideas in a briefing note and send them over to him.
The Prime Minister visited the estate alongside new , as a report on Neighbourhood Policing was published.
“Dealing with anti social behaviour is key to improving residents’ quality of life. Servite have utilised new anti social behaviour laws and worked effectively with local police to transform the Church Manor estate,” said the Home Secretary. “It's a good example of a housing association working closely with the police to cut crime and anti social behaviour, and protect and reassure the local community.”
Since the start of their new estate strategy at Church Manor, Servite have a dedicated ASB Officer at the estate, and incidents of anti social behaviour are down by a third."
SERVITES ARE THE BIGGEST CON MERCHANTS I HAVE EVER MET... PROMISE ALL AND GIVE YOU NOUGHT, EXCEPT 10-1 WORK THAT RUINS YOUR HOME AND YOUR LIFE!
MAYBE I SHOULD BECOME ONE OF THE RELIGOUS SECTS SERVITES BELONG TOO, AS THERE SURE IS SOMETHING AMISS WITH THE TREATMENT I RECIEVE FROM SERVITES!!!
COULD IT BE THAT I REPORTED THEM TO THE HOUSING OMBUDSMAN WHO IN LATE 2004 REPORTED THAT SERVITES WERE IN BREECH OF THEIR OWN TENANCY AGREEMENT AND OTHER MISDEMEANORS?
AS SINSE THEN (IT WAS BAD BEFORE) IT IS NOW REAL DISGUSTING AND ALBEIT I AM 75% DISABLED AND HAVE BEEN ON TRANSFER LIST BACK TO WEST LONDON WERE I HAD LIVED ALL MY LIFE FOR NEAR 10 YEARS NOW, WITH A LARGE QUANTITY OF REPORTS/DOCUMENTS FROM DOCTORS, PROFFESIONAL PEOPLE, ETCETERA GIVEN TO SERVITES SO THAT I CAN BE BACK WITH FAMILY AND FRIENDS PLUS THE EMENITIES I RECIEVED IN WEST LONDON (WHICH IS NON EXSISTANT IN BARNET) I AM STILL IN THIS HELL HOLE THAT SERVITES CHARGE NEAR ON £100 A WEEK FOR (£5,200 POUNDS PER YEAR)!
I am thinking maybe it would be a good idea if all the People on here and anywhere else that have negligent Landlords, got together and we formed an Housing association, recieved money from the Housing Corperation and started our own housing association, but properly not for the 7 figure yearly wage.....But for to make Peoples lives better...
susan denim
e-mail:
sdeni@aol.com
what about a proper newsletter?
02.07.2006 23:02
I wanted to start a proper newsletter to go to tenants, giving good, accurate information instead if the drivel in the NHHT newsletter, and with a letters page so we can get a proper debate going among all the decent people who cannot live a normal life because (among its many other failings) NHHT will not deal with the people who are breaking the terms of their tenancy agreements on a daily basis.
NHHT would not co-operate.
Who else thinks a tenant-edited newsletter would be a good idea? With no pictures of face painted children, and no patronising advice, just proper, solid information and plenty of feedback from people who know what thew real story is - the tenants.
valenzuela
Margaret Fitz
04.07.2006 15:04
Margaret Fitzsimons
e-mail:
walthew@merseymail.com
Notting Hill Housing Trust and practices
13.07.2006 16:38
I know that there are an increasing number of tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust who have raised legitimate complaints, as Kate Davis let me know that it is getting too much for her. She said that it is government policy for the social housing policy of our RSLs to remain the greatest secret of the Prime Minister, so it has to remain a secret. We are best friends so I have to speak up for her and support her, as she will ensure my promotion. Besides, I know that Kate's Trust deal in a considerable amount of unaccountable money as it is sourced from the ODPM - John Prescott's Office - and from the Housing Corporation part of ODPM - that's what Kate Davis said in confidence, which is why the national newspapers will not be allowed to publish any story about it. Jonathan Powell, Tom Sawyer, Nick Raynsford, Neil Kinnock, Clive Soley, Peter Mandelson and Jonathan Buchanan will all see to it. Kate makes it clear that it is all sorted out with Rebekah Wade whose partner is Ross Kemp who she seems to like hitting in the mouth has sorted out Murdoch's stable of papers and that nasty Harmsworth character that we at the core of the Labour Party and our crafty social experiment as ex members of the CP. Kate knows everyone at the heart of New Labour so our secret is rock solid safe and nothing can be done to change Servites or Notting Hill Housing Trust. The Conservative Party are so naive and they will never ever realise why JP can remain in the Cabinet - just like Michael Levy from Nan Clarks Lane at Mill Hill who keeps our secrets and will never ever be prosecuted because of Kenneth Macdonald's links to Cherie Booth from Matrix Chambers, so JP with his secrets can ensure he also remains in position and Tony has to keep him as JP knows all the secrets of the housing through our unaccountable funding and the gerrymandering of the vote which will never be discovered so Kate says that JP will remain in office with his full pay and all his benefits - and why not!
Margaret Fitzsimons
e-mail:
walthew@merseymail.com
Notting Hill Housing Trust Charities
15.07.2006 20:04
Jerry Mander
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - unaccountable - yes...
17.07.2006 13:30
Kate Davies says that it's not her - then who is it?
She has the support of Tom Sawyer - the man she calls 'her champion' - ex chairman of the Labour Party. Then he was made chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust when over 45 - yes, 45 - large properties of the 19,000 properties that make up the housing stock of Notting Hill Housing Trust just went 'missing'.
Ken Macdonald as the New Labour head of the Crown Prosecution Service of 22 Dartmouth Park Road, NW5 ISX was recommended for the job of Director of Public Prosecutions as he was previously the senior partner of Cherie Blair, her barrister friend at Matrix Chambers Limited, whom she recommended for the position of DPP to Tony Blair.
Ken Macdonald decided there would be no prosecution of the Labour Party oriented Notting Hill Housing Trust - of which all Board members of Notting Hill Housing Trust are Labour Party members.
[Ken Macdonald, not surprisingly decided that there was 'Insufficient evidence' - of course! There was, of course, no connection that in the light of Lord Tom Sawyer being chairman of Notting HIll Housing Trust that this made any difference to whether there were grounds for a prosecution of Notting Hill Housing Trust - or did it?]
Lord Tom Sawyer, fresh with his Tony Blair Labour Party peerage, quickly got out of Notting Hill Housing Trust, replacing him with his protege as a nominee, Gerard Lemos - who was quickly honoured. Gerard was made a Commissioner of the Audit Commission and Deputy Chairman of the British Council, the New Labour headed patronage filled British Crony Council. Tom Sawyer made Gerard Lemos a Labour CBE - no money was exchanged. Yet Gerard was made the main Government Race Adviser and his policies were implemented into Notting Hill Housing Trust. Priority was effected to non indigenous applicants. Indigenous applicants were relegated to the lowest priority.
Kate had the support of Gerard Lemos - the ex Communist homosexual who wanted to establish close links with the families [with children] who are tenants at Notting Hill Housing Trust. He lived with his male partner at the top of Highgate Hill.
Kate only hangs out with the New Labour crowd.
She detests the likes of those who want to find out the truth.
She makes it a priority that she does not ever write to tenants if they complain in writing.
She is noted for her lavish and profligate lifestyle.
The Marie Antoinette of Notting Hill Housing Trust. Her pay, benefits and expenses package, which is totally unaccountable is reaching astronomical proportions.
Her pay and perks has become a joke at the office.
She calls Lord Tom Sawyer - ex leader of the Labour Party - her champion.
She calls Nick Raynsford - the ex housing minister on the board - her champion.
She calls Jonathan Buchanan - the MI6 spy on the board - her champion.
Look up March 22 2006 to see that the papers made clear that the first official letter from Tom Sawyer - the ex NUPE leader who became Labour Party chairman - was sent from Tom Sawyer to Tony Blair when he was elected as Labour Party leader in 1997.
The second official letter from Tom Sawyer as Labour Party chairman was to Michael Levy of Chase House, NW7 4HH.
Michael knows how to avoid UK tax. Michael hates Gordon - who wants to tax him but Gormless Gordon can't tax Michael - Gordon hasn't got the brains.
Michael says it's simple to raise money.
i) set up a blind trust which Michael did for Tony and Cherie. [Always pretend to be friends]!
ii) Keep the money offshore - Israel and/or Channel Islands and/or Isle of Man - and out of the reach of Gordon. Follow the same tactics of Robert Maxwell [Always a bolthole in Israel].
iii) Blackmail Tony - undermine the Union and the Union bosses - give money direct to Tony so that the Party know nothing anbout it, then control the Party. That is Bobby's tactic - that is Tony's nickname for our Jewish friend Peter [Mandelson] and his nice New Labour Brazilian friend - Reinaldo Avila da Silva, the 32-year-old consort of the EU Trade Commissioner, who was granted citizenship last year, for supporting Peter.
iv) Call them non commercial 'loans' not donations - to avoid the Labour Party dinosaurs finding out.
v) All the time keep close to Cherie - as Carole Caplin did with Cherie - Tony is then powerless.
vi) Act as Ambassador to Middle East Affairs [no need for training - no need for independence - no need for Human Rights = Cherie's department! - He he he].
vii) Control the UK Middle East policy - to sort out the ignorant Arabs - and dictate policy - just as the 'Neocons' control US foreign policy - as through the US/UK RAND Corporation.
Without Peter, Tony would be sunk. Peter hates all the cabinet but without Peter, Tony is a dead man walking. That is why all Tony's phone calls to Peter are in code, referring to our friend Peter as 'Bobby'.
Tony hates Gordon and [Hull-oo] Prescott is ready to knife Tony - he knows the greatest secret of the housing scam, through the unaccountable Housing Corporation and unaccountable Audit Commission through to the Notting Hill Housing Trust flagship - when the time ever becomes right he has the power to sink Tony without trace.
That is why Tony is dead careful of JLP - Philip Anschutz's friend - and his demand to get as many of the supercasino licences in the UK for a very nice fat fee [Tessa Jowell who is also Jewish will help as will her husband as the 'arms-length' lawyer Mr Mills, who is the very good friend of Mr Berlusconi whose only interest in the UK is the biggest moneyspinner casino licences]. Now for Tony everything must go - Tony's government licences to deliver services to the NHS [the biggest employer in Europe] to privatise everything in Government that can be privatised - this is Tony's very last chance to sell off everything that links to the Government!
If only the public or the newspapers in the UK ever found out Tony's plan - then his days would be numbered and the electorate would all be screaming:
"BLAIR - OUT - OUT - OUT!"
Nick, Tom and Clive can't be trusted as they all want to stab Tony in the back, so Tony is off to see his pal Richard Webb [aka 'Cliff Richard'] at his villa with a fantastic swimming pool in Barbados. WW [aka 'the Wicked Witch'] loves it!
Peter as the prince of darkness makes out he is 'purer than pure' but that spin can only be used in him being totally gay. Fortunately, his two dogs (Jack and Bobby, named after the Kennedys) don't seem to be the same way inclined.
Peter has screwed New Zealand for us - to get rid of their import market in butter.
As for Michael Levy, he is head of the Jewish Leadership Council in the UK and with his children very firmly safe and living in the very best part of Israel, Michael instructed the best New Labour lawyer in Geoffrey Bindman who is Jewish so he knows he'll be OK.
Besides, Michael has craftily made friends of the people in the UK who are Jewish and who control the UK and its media, as Michel Grade [originally Winogradski] of the BBC and the ex Daily Telegraph editor, Dominic Lawson.
Jack Dromey and Harriet Harman of 1 Winterbrook Road, London SE24 9HZ better watch out. Jack is the official Treasurer as Ian McCartney was the Official Chairman. Yet poor Ian was made to immediately sign legal papers under duress - from which he needs to distance himself - whilst he was recovering in his hospital bed from cardiac surgery.
Mr McCartney, the minister for trade, was a former party chairman who signed papers nominating three of Labour's lenders for peerages while he recovered from a triple heart bypass in hospital. It was said that the nominees for a peerage had no financial involvement with the Labour Party. But did this statement contain in it even a scintilla of being true?
Michael Levy saw his friend Geoffrey Bindman last week. Geoffrey is a former chairman and vice-president of the SOCIETY OF LABOUR LAWYERS. He is chairman of the British Institute of Human Rights. He thinks he is a good pal of Tony's. Don't be so sure!
Bindman & Partners of 275 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8QB. Tel: 020-7833-4433 Fax: 020-7837-9792 or email:
Geoffrey qualified as a solicitor in 1959. He has practised in London since 1960 and founded Bindman & Partners in 1974. He specialises in civil liberty and human rights issues and has acted in many leading cases. From 1966 to 1976 he was Legal Adviser to the Race Relations Board and thereafter until 1983 to the Commission for Racial Equality.
Geoffrey is a Visiting Professor of Law at University College London, an Honorary Fellow in Civil Legal Process at the University of Kent, and a Fellow of the Society of Advanced Legal Studies. In 1982 he was Visiting Professor of Law at the University of California at Los Angeles. In July 2000 he received an honorary LL.D from De Montfort University. He has lectured at a number of other law schools in Britain, the United States and in other countries. He has contributed many articles in the national and legal press on human rights, media law, anti-discrimination law, and the legal profession, and has often broadcast on these subjects. He received awards in December 1999 and October 2003 from Liberty and the Law Society’s Gazette for lifetime achievement in human rights and in April 2000 from the International Client Counselling Competition for his lifetime contribution to client interviewing and counselling throughout the world. [It certainly helps to be a New Labour lawyer when, for the moment, New Labour are trying to hang on to the reins of power!]
Geoffrey has represented the International Commission of Jurists, the International Bar Association, Amnesty International, and other bodies in human rights missions in several countries, including the former Soviet Union, Germany, South Africa, Chile, Uganda, Namibia, Malaysia, Israel and the Occupied Territories, and Northern Ireland. In 1988 he was a member of a United Kingdom mission monitoring the constitutional referendum in Chile and in 1994 was a United Nations Observer at the first democratic elections in South Africa.
He edited the report of the International Commission of Jurists' 1987 mission to South Africa (South Africa: Human Rights and the Rule of Law (Pinter Publishers 1988; Revised Edition 1989). He is co-author with Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC of Race and Law (Longman & Penguin 1972). He has contributed chapters to several books, including Halsbury's Laws of England (4th Edition). He was an Oxford Amnesty lecturer, and has deliver the E.P. Thompson Memorial lecture at Worcester and the Ewan Davies lecture at Cardiff University.
Tony knows he's OK as he made sure he extended Ken Macdonald's contract as Director of Public Prosecutions - DPP - for another 2 whole years. Tony made sure that he will never ever be prosecuted. As for his ex flat mate, Charles Falconer ['Fatty Falconer'] he made it clear that having Tony as his ex flat mate, Fatty never had to pay for his title!
Now Tony has dug us into the greatest mess since the 2nd World War.
There is the prospect of a 3rd World War looming and all most of the newspapers can do is to publish trivia?
Israel [with access to the most sophisticated weapons in the world together with an arsenal of over 200 nuclear weapons] is now giving the order to conscipt its entire population.
What does this mean for World Peace?
China has warned Israel that it should face caution.
Syria and Iran are just waiting in the sidelines.
Unlike the Vatcan - Foolish Blair just blindly supports the United States without first exercising any kind of critical mental faculties, without any kind of caution or restraint as to what this could all mean for the next year.
b
e-mail:
b.white@hotmail.com
Notting Hill Hopusing The Scam
24.07.2006 00:15
Mr. Greg Hands (Hammersmith and Fulham) (Con): I am delighted to have been called in this debate as the Housing Corporation and the housing associations and registered social landlords that it oversees have a major impact on the lives of my constituents. According to the last census, 13.5 per cent. of Hammersmith and Fulham residents rent a property belonging to a housing association or another RSL, which is more than twice the national average. It is one of the highest rates in the United Kingdom, especially for a local authority that has not yet undertaken any significant large-scale voluntary transfers.
Our most important housing associations in Hammersmith and Fulham include the Notting Hill Housing Group, the Peabody Trust, and the Shepherds Bush Housing Association. Each has more than 1,000 housing units. The Notting Hill group alone has more than 4,000 homes in Hammersmith and Fulham. We have 49 different housing associations operating in all. The main RSL that will feature in my speech is the Notting Hill Housing Group. It has treated many of its tenants dreadfully in the recent past, and I wish to discuss the Bill's impact on them. Many tenants were treated so badly that they became activists in the general election for me last year, knocking on doors, stuffing envelopes and so on. In fact, they are the original Notting Hill Tories, converted to the blue cause not by lizards changing colour, as one sees on ridiculous Labour party leaflets, but by finding a candidate who takes an interest in their problems and complaints.
We all share an interest in seeing the Housing Corporation and housing associations operating effectively, so I welcome in general the Bill's provisions. However, I believe that we need a larger debate on the future of social housing and housing associations in general, and the Bill therefore represents something of a missed opportunity. Given the demand in the House for
25 Apr 2006 : Column 527
more discussion of these issues, it seems a great pity that a whole day of Government time has been allocated to debating essentially one paragraph of a technicality, even if it is an interesting technicality. I mentioned to many housing association tenants in Hammersmith and Fulham that this debate was coming. Certainly, a number are concerned that previous decisions made by the Housing Corporation may not have been legally valid. Equally, a number are interested in an opportunity to see some of those decisions reversed. So this kind of bureaucratic mistake does not reflect well on our public institutions, including Parliament, which passed the Bill in the first place.
I want to talk about some of the missed opportunities in the Bill, but first I want to mention its shocking cost—£1.50 for only 22 lines is the price recorded on the reverse by The Stationery Office, which represents incredibly poor value for money.
The first problem is the poor accountability of housing associations. The Bill is all about accountability, so this is indeed a missed opportunity. Let us contrast housing associations with councils as landlords. I am disappointed that the hon. Member for North-West Leicestershire (David Taylor) has departed because I want to say something about council management of homes.
The council has an advantage in being directly accountable in that it is, of course, elected. Obviously, it is not only its tenants who vote in council elections, but no candidate or local councillor can afford to ignore the voice of council tenants. In many London boroughs, the marginal wards can almost be defined as those that have a sizeable number of council tenants.
In the borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, the ward in which I live—Fulham Broadway—is a key marginal, largely because of the presence of the Clem Attlee estate, which is mostly council-owned. One of the most influential people in the borough is Val Barker, who chairs the Clem Attlee Rocque and Maton residents association, which she does very well, taking scrupulous care to remain politically neutral. Her voice is influential, but she does not have a powerful equivalent in neighbouring registered social landlord estates. We therefore need to do more to improve tenant involvement and RSLs' accountability to tenants. Council officers effectively deal with day-to-day matters on council estates, including repairs, the collection of refuse, the investigation of antisocial behaviour reports and so on. Most council tenants know that if things do not go well, they can call or contact their councillor. In turn, the council officer has a constitutional duty to address practical concerns by listening to the councillor, at the very least. That is not categorically not the case for housing associations. Better housing associations listen to cases brought by individual councillors, but many do not do so and go out of their way to obstruct councillors' inquiries.
To return to the Housing Corporation, such political influence is not afforded to housing association tenants. By contrast, private sector tenants, who lack council tenants' political clout, often have a more responsive landlord. We have all dealt with hundreds of cases in our constituencies involving nightmare private landlords. In my experience, however, I receive far fewer complaints about private landlords than about RSLs or the council,
25 Apr 2006 : Column 528
which leads me to conclude that private sector landlords are usually more responsive to problems and complaints.
25 Apr 2006 : Column 529
Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order. The hon. Gentleman is beginning to spin out of orbit so far as the Bill is concerned. This is not the appropriate platform for a general comparative discussion of rents and rates of increase. He should come back to the terms of the Bill.
Mr. Hands: I accept your guidance, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I was merely pointing out that great play was made in 1998 of rent rises. That was reversed by rent restructuring in 2001, which led to the Housing Corporation, having previously teamed up with councils such as Hammersmith and Fulham and being a backer of low rents—remember the words of my predecessor: tenants would, ironically, have been better off under the Conservatives—being metamorphosed overnight into a facilitator of inflation-busting rent rises. We are half way through the so-called rent restructuring, which will see housing association rents rise.
Mr. Bone: Does my hon. Friend agree that, with reference to the Housing Corporation, there are a great many omissions from the Bill?
Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order. I am sure the hon. Member for Wellingborough (Mr. Bone) is trying to be of assistance to the hon. Member for Hammersmith and Fulham (Mr. Hands). However, as I have already suggested, a wider discussion about rents is out of place.
Mr. Hands: I agree, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I merely point out that my Labour predecessor was right. People are better off under the Conservatives.
That brings me to another aspect of the work of the Housing Corporation that is barely addressed but could be endangered by the provisions of the Bill—that is, the creation of more shared ownership housing in London. I had the great pleasure of welcoming my right hon. Friend the Member for Witney (Mr. Cameron) to my constituency last month to look at a shared ownership scheme at Invermead close in Hammersmith, which we hope and expect to be successful. According to the census that I mentioned earlier, shared ownership is just under 1 per cent. of the total housing stock in Hammersmith and Fulham.
The Opposition support shared ownership schemes as a way of helping people on to the property ladder in expensive areas such as Hammersmith and Fulham. We need to consider how the Housing Corporation can encourage more shared ownership builds. Increased powers of delegation may help, although I believe that the shared ownership decision should probably be taken at board level.
Not all shared ownership schemes are a success. One in my constituency has been a spectacular failure to date. Two weeks ago I chaired a meeting of the residents of Mallard house in the new Imperial Wharf development in Fulham, together with officers of the housing associations. It is a pity that the Housing Corporation was not represented. Imperial Wharf is the largest residential housing development seen in west London for many years, with 2,000-odd homes approved so far. It is a flagship development for new Labour, the council and the Housing Corporation. Ken Livingstone described it as
"a template of what I want to see across London."
25 Apr 2006 : Column 530
The scheme is half private, half social and is heavily funded by the Housing Corporation, but unfortunately the economics of the scheme do not work for local people. The private housing is extremely expensive. I have some recent property supplements in which homes in Imperial Wharf are advertised at £1.75 million, £1.35 million and so on. Few people can afford that. The social housing was funded by the Housing Corporation under delegated powers that may or may not have been proper. Even local Labour councillors condemn the poor construction and small size of that housing.
The biggest criticism of all, which should be of great interest to the Housing Corporation, stems from the price of the 15 per cent. of the units that are shared ownership, pitched at key workers. Those cost between £320,000 and £410,000 and the scheme is reckoned to be Britain's most expensive so-called affordable housing scheme funded by the Housing Corporation. In rent and mortgage, a typical couple appear to be paying £1,005 a year to live there. In a six-storey block, perhaps—
Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order. The more I hear on this subject from the hon. Gentleman, the more I think it would be appropriate for an Adjournment debate, but certainly not for the debate on the Second Reading of the Bill. He is going far too wide in presenting his arguments.
Mr. Hands: Thank you for that guidance, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I was going to list the litany of complaints from Mallard house residents, many of whom are taking legal action.
Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order. The hon. Gentleman should not argue with the ruling from the Chair; he should accept the guidance.
Mr. Hands: The debate on this Bill is being watched closely in Hammersmith and Fulham. Notting Hill Housing Group is one of the biggest recipients of funds under delegated powers from the Housing Corporation. About two years ago, I issued an appeal in our local papers for tenants who had suffered under the group and was amazed by the response. I received e-mails from people complaining about how the group had treated them, and the examples included walls that had fallen down not being repaired and other failings.
The Bill allows powers to be delegated within the Housing Corporation, which could set an unwelcome precedent for some of the housing associations that are administered by and were regulated by the Housing Corporation. It will be difficult to tell housing associations that they cannot have those sweeping delegated powers if the Housing Corporation is allowed them. Residents of estates such as the Chambon, Solon Housing's estate on the river on Carnwath road and Orbit's development at Gwyn close would not like to see increased delegated powers.
Notting Hill Housing Group has a famous history and an exemplary mission, namely to provide low-cost housing in areas of west London with expensive property prices and high private sector rents. It provides more than 11,000 affordable homes, more than 4,000 of which are in Hammersmith and Fulham, and it is taking a keen interest in our debate today.
25 Apr 2006 : Column 531
Nothing prepared me for the public response to the appeal that I put out a couple of years ago. I am currently dealing with a number of Notting Hill Housing Group tenants who are experiencing significant problems and who are watching this debate closely to see whether the delegated powers will have an impact on them. For example, Collette Murray must share her bedroom with her son aged nine, because they cannot use their sitting room owing to the antisocial behaviour of the tenant below. Mrs. Jacobs of Shepherd's Bush road had had her floorboards up for eight years, until I inspected her property.
Jackson
IS NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST NOT INDIRECTLY PART OF ODPM?
24.07.2006 13:59
We've all heard of J [BLATHERING BUFFOON - the MERCHANT NAVY SHIP'S STEWARD] PRESCOTT [HEAD OF ODPM that controls HOUSING in the UK - the reason why YO{GI BEAR} BLAIR could not Sack him until BLAIR goes].
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is the flagship REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD that is funded from the massive BILLION Pound unaccountable Office of Deputy Prime Minister Housing budget. [Out of which JLP can entertain Rosie Winterton with his minders in tow - the Labour MP and Labour Luvvie friend of JLP who detests Poor Pauline Prescott?]Responsibilities of Rosie Winterton MP include International and EU business, including overseas charging and ID cards, emergency preparedness including pandemic flu and Health Minister.
We/'ve all heard of the head of COMMUNIST JOHN REID the SCOTTISH HOME SECRETARY who likes to pose as a 'bruiser' to announce yet another so-called 'crackdown' on illegal immigration - but it all one monumental deceptiopn and charade. The way to deal with it is to get rid of responsibility for it by restructuring it as a quasi-independent agency.
So easy when you are neither responsible nor do you believe in accountability but just hollow words?
The Home Officer Minister - like all of New Labour are Discredited Unaccountable and Distance themselves from the lives of Ordinary people.
YOGI BEAR BLAIR only goes to NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST in order to disguise the fact of the massive Housing Scandal of Corruption linked between ODPM - HOUSING CORPORATION - AUDIT COMMISSION - and the Flagship Housing Trust, NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST based at 27 HAMMERSMITH GROVE, HAMMERSMITH, LONDON W6 OLJ?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST use the same NEW LABOUR language of the NEW LABOUR Government.
"Political language is designed to make LIES sound truthful and MURDER respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind [flatulence]!" That statement by the ex policeman - George Orwell in 1950 perfectly captures the DISHONESTY and DECEIT at the very heart of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST management as it captures the DISHONESTY and DECEIT at the heart of New Labour's Government approach to Immigration.
YO[GI BEAR] BLAIR [George Walker Bush's nickname for TONY [the CLOWN] BLAIR has used NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as the means to implement the MULTICULTURAL DOCTRINE, driven by mass immigration, the guiding principle of the BLAIRITE STATE.
The greatest con trick BLAIR ever pulled off through LABOUR LORD TOM SAWYER, ex Chairman of the Labour Party, GERARD LEMOS his protege who was made Deputy Chairman of the BRITISH [CRONY] COUNCIL to NEIL KINNOCK [a speeding ban was imposed on him on 26 April 2006 on the M4] and now ALAN COLE is the latest in a line of New Labour nominees as Chairman of the largest multi-cultural housing experiment in the world through the multi-culturism doctrine, driven by mass immigration. The CON TRICK that has been pulled off was to make Tolerant people believe that YOGI BEAR BLAIR was a moderate centrist politician. In reality Blair has led the biggest revolution in Britain, remodelling its structure.
A once cohesive tranquil nation is being rapidly changed into a land mass of disparate ethnic groups, without any spirit of shared belonging, heritage, culture or even language.
Liberal politicians and their agents like YOGI BEAR-BLAIR, JOHN BLATHERING PRESCOTT, JOHN CALL ME DOCTOR (MARX)? REID, NEIL KINNOCK, TOM SAWYER, CLIVE SOLEY, GERARD LEMOS, ALAN COLE, TONY Mc(NUTTY)NULTY, JONATHAN POWELL [brother of CHARLES POWELL - always Chief of Staff to Prime Ministers], PETER MANDELSON, and ALASTAIR CAMPBELL, DERRY IRVINE, 'FATTY' CHARLES FALCONER, PETER GOLDSMITH, MIKE O'BRIEN, KEN MACDONALD, HARRIET HARMAN, HAZEL BLEARS and of course the architect - MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY, the accountant and Mossad chief from Israel - the unofficial money man who came up with the deceit of loans for donations, the man who wants to control us all, the main man of Chase House, Nan Clarks Lane, Mill Hill he has sold us all out - lock, stock and barrel.
The Price of this Revolution is being paid by the less well off, particularly by the indigenous urban working classes. They find themselves being priced out of the labour market and the public services they paid for through their taxes overstretched. They see lengthening dole queues, crisis ridden hospitals, disordered classrooms, crime ridden streets and overcrowded cities. They can see little hope from a lying and corrupt Government [yes, the Home Affairs Select Committee of MPs revealed yesterday that under Clowning YOGI BLAIR, Blatering Bufoon Prescott in 2004/5 there were more than 700 cases of CORRUPTION involving staff in the Immigration Service - how many cases of CORRUPTION exist at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST???] that contunually disguises its real intentions with expensive stunts and hollow words.
Just like at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that implements New Labour Party policy on the ground - it misleads the public, tenants and indivildual stakeholders - at every turn it FAILS to CONSULT!
It uses ILLEGALITY!
While the demographic transformation of our nation continues, the people have not only never been consulted about this gigantic change, ther has been no debate, no vote and the political elite through its GESTAPO GOONS and unaccountable agents as political elite it imposes its will clising down any meaningful discussion by hurling the oldest con trick that the NAZIS used in the book - accusations of RACISM against anyone who dares to object to the destruction of Britain's nationhood.
Fiddled Figures
Bureaucratic Cover-Ups
Treating the real PERPETRATORS as the perceived purported VICTIMS
Treating the real VICTIMS as the perceived purported PERPETRATORS
Empty Propaganda that would do the NAZI Black Arts man GOEBBELS [MANDELSON?] proud
Fraudulent Predictions
Racist Offences used to attack the indigenous people or tenants
These have all been Key Elements of the Government's Strategy to Deceive!
BLAIR uses MULTICULTURALISM as does NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - to undermine our traditions!
Go Away YOGI BEARBLAIR you are not wanted - go take advantage of the Sugar Hill Villa of 'Cliff Richard' in Barbados in exchange for the paltry charitable non entity donation you usually give - as Richard Webb has informed me, when I see him.
BUT don't give any donations to NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST as it is not worthy of the name Charity - is NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST not a scam to avoid the payment of any taxes?
Its properties are wotrh over £4,000,000,000 FOUR BILLION POUNDS
It owns over 19,000 PROPERTIES
It has over £400,000,000 FOUR HUNDRED MLLION in ready change in the BANK.
Why have 21 Charity shops in the most exclusive locations of London?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST appears from the evidence, as so many other contributors have well and truly noted, as nothing but a major scam run by the ODPM that links back to BLATHERING BUFFOON PRESCOTT and YOGI BEAR BLAIR?
YOGI BEAR BLAIR - PM has deceived me.
BLATHERING BUFFOON PRESCOTT - DPM has deceived me.
All the Scottish Communists in the NEW LABOUR Cabinet have deceived me.
All NEW LABOUR politicians have deceived me.
All the Multicultural Spokesman in the NEW LABOUR Government have deceived me.
All the Multicultural Spokesman at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have deceived me.
All the senior management at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have deceived me.
All the NEW LABOUR employees - which they are - at LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM have deceived me.
All the NEW LABOUR management - which they are - at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST have deceived me.
We have all NOW thankfully been freed from the tyrannnical New Labour Local Government of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham on 6 May 2006.
When can we ALL be freed from the tyrannnical New Labour Central Government of YOGI BEAR Clown BLAIR?
ALAN COLE, KATE DAVIES, SARAH ARMSTRONG, JOHN BARRY and your evil team just stop harassing the good tenants with the very same evil deceitful schemes that you use on all the good tenants!
Delroy
delroy
NOTTING HILL HOUSING [DO NOT] TRUST
24.07.2006 15:32
WOULD YOU PUT YOUR FAITH IN THIS MAN TO TRUST HIM WITH YOUR LIFE?
IS NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST NOT THE MOST NOTORIOUS HOUSING ASSOCIATION IN THE UK TODAY?
WORSE, FAR WORSE THAN RACHMAN? [IN 1967]
WORSE, FAR WORSE THAN VAN HOOGENSTRATEN?
IS THAT WHY THE B.LIAR VISITS SOME CAREFULLY SELECTED TENANTS UNDER INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE NEW LABOUR AGENTS AT 27 HAMMERSMITH GROVE, HAMMERSMITH W6 OLJ AS OFTEN AS HE CAN - IN ORDER TO DECEIVE?
IS NOT THE CHAIRMAN OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST A MEMBER OF NEW LABOUR?
IS NOT THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST A MEMBER OF NEW LABOUR?
ARE NOT THE DIRECTORS OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ALL MEMBERS OF NEW LABOUR?
IS NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST NOT COMPLETELY CROOKED?
IS NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST NOT COMPLETELY CORRUPT?
ARE NOT MOST OF ITS TENANTS SCREAMING ABOUT ITS RACHMAN ABUSES?
IS NOT ITS MANAGEMENT NOW FULLY OUT OF CONTROL?
SHOULD NOT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST NOW BE CLOSED DOWN AS A FAILED
REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD?
HOW MANY MORE GOOD NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST TENANTS MUST CONTINUE TO BE TREATED AS VICTIMS OF THE EVIL GESTAPO MANAGEMENT?
MY FRIEND WAS PLACED IN ONE OF THEIR SLUM BASEMENT FLATS IN MASSIVE DISREPAIR, PUT IN RENT ARREARS BY THEIR NEW LABOUR FRIENDS AT THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT OF LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM WHO ARE SUPPLIED FLATS FROM NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST OF WHICH THE TRUST ARE GOOD AT LOSING THEIR FLATS FOR THE RIGHT AMOUNT - THERE WERE 45+ FLATS THAT WERE MISAPPROPRIATED OUT OF THE HOUSING STOCK YET NO PROSECUTION - DO THE COUNCIL HOUSING DEPARTMENT NOT DELIBERATELY INHIBIT THE RENT OF THOSE TENANTS THE TRUST WANT TO DISCREDIT AND THEN THE TRUST PLACE A 'TENANT FROM HELL' NEXT TO THE INTENDED PURPORTED DISCREDITED TENANT.
ARE NOT THE NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST MANAGEMENT EVIL BASTARDS WHO ARE ANTI-SEMITIC AND PRACTICE DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION AND RACIAL DISCRIMINATION.
IF YOU DON'T EVICT YOURSELF FROM YOUR FLAT - THE EVIL GESTAPO BASTARDS BREAK INTO YOUR FLAT WITHOUT GOING TO ANY COURTS.
THESE ARE ALL THE TACTICS OF THE GESTAPO - THE NAZI EVIL THUGS!!!
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST APPEAR TO HAVE FULL IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION?
HOW?
WHY?
GOVERNMENT CONTROL SUPPORTS HOUSING AT ANY COST IN ORDER TO STOP THE PUBLIC FINDING OUT ABOUT THE REAL CORRUPTION OF HOUSING IN THIS COUNTRY AT THE CORE OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT POLICY.
MORE DEMAND FROM MORE IMMIGRATION PUSHES THE PRICE UP OF PROPERTY!
B.LIAR AND BUFFOON BLATHERING PRESCOTT CONTINUE THE LIES AND DECEIT.
SAWYER, SOLEY AND RAYNSFORD APPEAR TO PROTECT THE GESTAPO MANAGEMENT ALL IN AN EFFORT TO ACCESS THE UNACCOUNTABLE HOUSING CORPORATION MONEY AND THE UNACCOUNTABLE 19,000 PROPERTIES WORTH OVER FOUR BILLION POUNDS [ACCOUNTABLE TO THE EXECUTIVE BUT NOT ACCOUNTABLE TO PARLIAMENT]!
THE BIGGEST HOUSING SCAM CON IN THE UK TODAY - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST?
earl
NAME AND SHAME THE NOTTING HILL PERPETRATORS OF EVIL?
24.07.2006 15:53
Babatunde ADEKOYA
Sarah ARMSTRONG
John BARRY
Mary BURKE
Shane DARGUE
Dean DAVIS
Silvia FERNANDEZ
Cathy GORMAN
Hadi KASSIR
Jennifer KWAKYE
David LADELE
David LORD
Robert MEW
Amanda MORRISON [Now at SBHA – but don’t get rid of all the properties, will you?]
Dianne MOYLAN
Kevin MURRAY
Luam NEGUSSE
Onike PORTHER
Sharon PROSPERE
Nadine SAAKWA
Victoria SPEDDING
Sharon STEWART
Sharon SUTHERLAND-BROWN
Sharon THOMPSON
Mark THOMSON
Mark WHITE
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST (NHHT) – Maintain a high turnover of low grade staff
NHHT has developed the worst reputation of any landlord to confront good tenants in London
The Chief Executive – Kate DAVIES - must go or a demonstration with the Press will follow.
kingsley
nottinghill housing Trust
25.07.2006 11:48
The names of corruption. Babatunde Adekoya, Nadine Saakwa, Lorraine Willmott, Ibe Joke Eso, Jennifer Kwakye, Oladipo Oladapo, Sarah Armstrong, David Lord, John Barry and Cathy Gorman. Notting Hill Housing Trust is run by Nigerian fraudsters who usurp and rob finances from the accounts of unaccountable public money. As the money is unaccountable no one will be able to know how much has been stolen and no investigation will bear any findings. There is also a conflict of interest in the housing sector between Notting Hill Housing Trust and the local authorities who rely on Nottinghill Housing to provide housing stock to permanently house people in the borough to whom the local authority has a legal duty to house. So, effectively complete reluctance to investigate. Notting Hill Housing must be closed down and stripped of all all housing stock which is to be given to the local authority.
Rodriguez
Closure Of Notting Hill Housing Trust
25.07.2006 22:49
This will be the foremost priority of the incoming Conservative central government. These challenges are headed under the following: Quality of Life, Public Service Improvement and Social Justice. Particularly to anyone who is vulnerable and /or suffering from a disability.
Sebastian
e-mail:
frontfire@yahoo.com
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST MISMANAGEMENT
27.07.2006 22:04
Being Tony's flatmate means I don't have to bung Tony a million quid...
ali
What's the Charity?
04.08.2006 00:00
What is the charity?
Notting Hill Housing Trust withdrew as a charity from the Provident Societies in April 2006 but nevertheless continues to trade as a charity.
What is the charity?
Education, the relief of poverty, religion and 'other public benefit' are the 4 (four) heads of establishment of the Trust of a charitable charity. In the case of Notting Hill Housing Trust this is unclear.
What is the charity?
Notting Hill Housing Trust have millions and millions of unaccountable funds. The money is completely unaccountable. There is no charity, it is a scam.
The logo of Nottinghill Housing and the Notting Hill Housing Trust are deceiving. Londoners have been deceived. Notting Hill Housing Trust have undermined and eroded the principles of charity in the sense that through deception, there is no aspect of good faith. Without good faith there can be no charity. With charity, there is no accountability.
Charity
The Reason
14.10.2006 19:26
Joseph Coates
Housing Problems
17.10.2006 01:59
Hi everyone,
Notting Hill Housing Trust is peeing me off big style,
I reported to them on Monday that my roof is leaking and they confirmed that the roofers will be with me today (Wednesday) in the afternoon and they have got my contact number just in case of problems....and that it is a class one priority and if it was possible should be done now or yesterday,
I went in to their office just as it was getting dark this evening (knowing they are not going to fix my roof in the dark) to find out why I have had to reschedule my week for nothing and why no one has called me or turned up!!!!
I discover that the complaint was put on the system, Tuesday, by a woman, and that the complaint somehow has not been allocated to the repair team.....Oh, and is a now a grade three catagory not a grade one !!!!
A bit strange, is that...The person that put it on the system ...in front of me ...was male, of a different skin colour and it was on Monday ????
After a bit of squabbling the woman tells me that they have found someone that will repair it tommorow....we`ll see...
I have told them I won`t be at home, no problem they say, as they have access via the front using ladders, which I am sure contravenes the safety rules, as they are supposed to use scafolding when they have to go higher than 35 feet...and my roof is 50 foot high,
Also if there are any problems they are to give me a call on the mobile phone.
I asked for a letter back responding to my dissatisfaction and possible loss of money caused by their negligence, to get told....wait for it!!!!...
"Oh, I am sorry sir, you have to send a letter in as we have a seperate department for complaints"....?
Why the hell can`t she log it from the terminal she is sitting at? after all I am the so called "Customer", so, why should I have to do all the work?
Leaking Roof
Influencing government or public opinion
26.10.2006 02:16
Influencing government or public opinion
A charity must not base any attempt to influence public opinion or to put pressure on the government, whether directly or indirectly through supporters or members of the public, to legislate or adopt a particular policy on data which it knows (or ought to know) is inaccurate or on a distorted selection of data in support of of a preconceived position.
A charity must not participate in party political demonstrations.
A charity must not claim evidence of public support for its position on a political issue without adequate justification.
A charity must not issue material which supports or opposes a particular party or government.
A charity must not seek to persuade members of the public to vote for or against a candidate or for or against a political party.
A charity must not distort research, or the results of research, to support a preconceived position or objective.
A charity must not promote the results of research conducted by itself or others which it knows, or ought to know, to be flawed.
A charity must not undertake research for another body where it is clear that body intends to use the research for political or propagandist purposes.
President
Useless housing officers - do they think they are social workers?
31.12.2006 16:41
I am tired of inexperienced and useless housing officers who know nothing about housing law and only seem to exist to say stupid things.
As far as I am concerned, mine and any other tenant's relationship with NHT begins and ends with the tenancy agreement. But try telling NHT this! They will kick and scream all the way in an effort to ignore this. They like feeling that they have power over tenants, but the reality is that they are employed by the landlords to provide a service.
I told them to put a letters page in their dreary newsletter, so that tenanst could swap experiences (for eg about the rude and useless repairs dept), but of course they did not want thi.
Who else would like to see a letters page? Or even our own magazine, with proper articles written by experts and lawyers, and a letters and emails page where people can put their own experiences and get expert advice?
What do people think?
m valenzuela
WHY DID TONY BLAIR BETRAY GEORGE BUSH & LAURA BUSH
31.12.2006 19:38
TONY BLAIR HAS MADE THE UK SPIRITUALLY & MORALLY BANKRUPT
WHY DID TONY BLAIR BETRAY THE BRITISH PEOPLE?
THE WAR ON TERRORISM IS A BLAIR WAR AGAINST THE BEST BRITISH PEOPLE.
WAS KATE DAVIES - THE COMMUNISTA - PUT IN POWER TO UNDERMINE THE
CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING?
WHY DID TONY BLAIR PUT ALL THE COMMUNISTAS IN POWER AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING - IN ORDER TO UNDERMINE THE OPPOSITION?
IS IT TRUE THAT EVERY MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING IS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNISTA LABOUR PARTY?
BLAIR & ALL THE BOARD AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING DETEST THE CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL PARTY.
IS IT TRUE THAT THE CHAIRMAN - CHIEF EXCECUTIVE & BOARD OF DIRECTORS ARE ALL THE HARDEST LEFT MEMBERS OF THE LABOUR COMMUNISTA PARTY?
THE MANAGEMENT OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING ALL APPEAR TO DETEST THE BEST TENANTS AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING -
NOTTING HILL HOUSING IS THE MOST UNDEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATION IN THE UK TODAY
earl
Homepage:
http://TONY BLAIR BETRAYED GEORGE & LAURA BUSH
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HOUSING SCAM
01.01.2007 21:28
WE ALL KNOW ABOUT THE LIES, CORRUPTION, BETRAYAL & INNOCENT DEATHS OF GOOD PEOPLE THAT WOULD LEAVE A BANANA REPUBLIC BREATHLESS WITH DISBELIEF
TONY BLAIR [HIS GOOD MALE FRIEND, ROBIN GIBB], CHERIE BLAIR [HER FEMALE LOVER, CAROL CAPLIN?], KEN McDONALD, CHARLES FALCONER, PETER GOLDSMITH, MIKE O'BRIEN, HILARY ARMSTRONG, HAZEL BLEARS, JACQUI SMITH, HARRIET HARMAN, ALASTAIR CAMPBELL, PETER MANDELSON, JONATHAN POWELL, MICHAEL LEVY & THE PURVEYORS OF LIES, SPIN, CANT & DISSEMBLING.
THE DAYS OF TONY BLAIR ARE FINISHED!
BLAIR THOUGHT THE BRITISH ELECTORATE WERE STUPID SUBJECTS
BLAIR THOUGHT HE WOULD STAY TO ENJOY THE 1,000 YEAR REICH.
BLAIR THOUGHT THAT ALL THE TENANTS AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST WERE DUMB.
BLAIR THOUGHT THAT A CORRUPT ENTERPRISE IN THE HEART OF HAMMERSMITH AT HAMMERSMITH GROVE COULD CONTINUE AS HIS LASTING CORRUPT LEGACY.
BLAIR THOUGHT THAT ENOUGH UNLAWFUL BEHAVIOUR - ENOUGH DECEIT - ENOUGH HARASSMENT - ENOUGH NON RENT ARREARS - ENOUGH TENANTS FROM HELL DELIBERATELY PLACED TO EVICT GOOD TENANTS - ENOUGH EVIL BEHAVIOUR - ENOUGH BAD DISREPAIR - ENOUGH SELLING OF VALUABLE PROPERTIES UNLAWFULLY THROUGH A CORRUPT UNLAWFUL EVICTION UNDER THE FEET OF GOOD TENANTS - THE UNLAWFUL BRICKING UP OF WINDOWS OF GOOD TENANTS AT BROOK GREEN - ALL DONE BY CORRUPT MANAGEMENT? - ALL DONE ON A HUNGRY POWER TRIP - MANY HOOKED ON DRUGS?
BLAIR YOUR DAYS ARE TRULY FINISHED
BLAIR WAS ALWAYS THE EPITOME OF EVIL
BLAIR'S POLICIES WERE PUT IN PLACE BY THE LABOUR LORD SAWYER?
HIS NOMINATED CHAIRMAN OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
WAS HE NOT OBLIGED TO SEEK REFUGE IN THE LORDS AS A LABOUR LORD?
BLAIR'S POLICIES WERE PURSUED ROBUSTLY BY GERARD LEMOS?
THE NOMINATED CHAIRMAN AS PROTEGE OF LABOUR LORD TOM SAWYER?
HE WAS OBLIGED TO RUN AWAY TO CHINA!
BLAIR'S POLICIES WERE CONTINUED BY THE LABOUR ALAN COLE?
THE NOMINATED CHAIRMAN AS REPLACEMENT OF LABOUR GERARD LEMOS
THE LABOUR SUPPORTER EXTRAORDINAIRE?
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST USES THE MAO TSE TUNG LOGO OF THE RED LOTUS!
THIS WEDS NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST INEXTRICABLY TO THE LABOUR PARTY.
ALL THE MAIN BOARD MEMNERS ARE LABOUR PARTY GAULEITERS - AS THOSE WHO WERE INEXTRICABLY WEDDED TO THE NAZI PARTY...
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST BELIEVES IN PREYING ON THE MOST VULNERABLE MEMBERS OF SOCIETY IN LONDON.
TONY BLAIR WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY AS A LIAR, A BETRAYER AND A FRIEND OF EVIL TYRANTS WHO KILLED COUNTLESS INNOCENT MEN, WOMEN & CHILDREN WHILST HE ACTED AS THE ELECTIVE DICTATOR OF WHAT HE SAW AS HIS COMPLIANT SUBJECTS WHOM HE ABUSED
TONY BLAIR HAS MADE NO CONTRIBUTION - JUST PUTTING IT BACK IN TIME - THE CHILDREN OF TOMORROW WILL HAVE TO WORK TO THEIR DEATHS TO TRY TO SAVE FOR A PENSION - HE DESTROYED THE NHS IN THIS COUNTRY.
HIS WAR WAS AGAINST THE BRITISH PEOPLE
THE HOUSING WAS FOR OUTSIDERS
CRIME WILL ESCALATE
PRISONS ARE FULL TO BURSTING
DRUGS, ALCOHOL & CRIME JUST GETS WORSE - HOUSING HAS BEEN SOLD OFF TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER -
BETRAYER
BOMBER
BLAIR!
darcus
Homepage:
http://NOTTING HILL HOUSING - THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT HOUSING SCAM IN LONDON
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - HANDLING STOLEN GOODS?
02.01.2007 15:31
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST is now a money making RACHMAN enterprise.
Property speculation first - people last - vulnerable tenants do not figure!
Don't go to any of the so-called charity shops - they're just a front - a scam.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST evict tenants. Set the bailiffs in. Unlawfully confiscate personal property of the tenant.
Then the personal property of the tenant appears for sale in the charity shops!
The non existent charity of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST twenty one charity shops in the most exclusive parts of London make a big profit.
The new 'owner' is not aware that they are now 'handling stolen goods'.
The new owner is not aware that they are perpetrating the new Rachmanism of 2007 of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST that is Blair's Betraying Britain.
KEEP POVERTY IN PLACE - SUPPORT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST CHARITY - THE SCAM - THE CHARITY SHOPS!
delroy
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
04.01.2007 22:25
24DASH.COM IS USED BY POLITICIANS THAT LIE FOR A LIVING, NOT FOR THE LIKES OF A HOUSING TRUST THAT SHOULD BE OPEN HONEST APPROACHABLE AND ACCOUNTABLE
DOES THIS MEAN THAT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS NOT OPEN HONEST APPROACHABLE AND ACCOUNTABLE
IS NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST STILL IN THE BUSINESS OF CONFRONTING AND HARASSING TENANTS - LIKE THE EVIL RACHMAN OF NOTTING HILL - IN 2007???
bev
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
28.01.2007 18:43
Notting Hill Housing Trust is controlled indirectly by TONY BLIAR and by RUTH KELLY.
Understand how Notting Hill Housing Trust is manipulated by the Labour Party Commisars who are linked to the CRE and the Law Centres and Advice Centres in the Borough which make a point of stitching up vulnerable tenants. Why are the management of Law Centres of Hammersmith & Fulham represented as Directors of Notting Hill Housing Trust and why are such unrepresentative individuals who are biased and were placed in positions to betray the interests of tenants who as Labour Party Commisars dictate the way tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust's case will be manipulated and perverted by the biased Advice Agencies which are funded by the Borough and such unrepresentative confrontational individuals sit as Directors on the Board of Directors of Notting Hill Housing Trust. There is always an 'Uncle Tom' who is bought out by the mercenary manipulators of the discredited New Labour Party.
Such advice agencies funded by the Borough should all be closed down - as they are all biased and provide skewed political advice in the sole interests of the confrontational and corrupt Notting Hill Housing Trust - funded indirectly by unaccountable taxpayers money!
NHHT is the intolerant totalitarian 'flagship' Housing Asssociation indirectly controlled by Tony Bliar, Ruth Kelly, Alan Cole, Kate Davies, Sarah Armstrong, John Barry, Nadine Saakwa and all the confrontational management whose objective is to attack good tenants.
Many good people are tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
Many intelligent people are tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
Indeed, such tenants could and should run an organization which has become totally discredited.
New blood is needed.
Intelligent non corrupt people who see the reality are now needed to run NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - not the 'ONE POUND SHAREHOLDERS' whose membership is decided by the LABOUR PARTY MEMBER who is CHAIRMAN of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, ALAN COLE - what kind of overseeing authority is this? People who are known to be housed in better housing conditions than the rest of the tenants?
The organization of NOTTNG HILL HOUSING TRUST is in dire need of massive re-organisation in order to root out the massive CORRUPTION in its midst.
In BLIAR's BRITAIN of today, as at NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, there is a 'one size fits all' approach - admitting that BLIAR's version of LABOUR has failed an entire generation of tenants.
This means that the Conservatives WILL win power unless the tenants are listened to.
ARCH BLAIRITES think they can shape the future of LABOUR policy - if they think that, they are sadly mistaken - their power - haemorhaging by the day - LABOUR CHAIRMAN - HAZEL BLEARS
LABOUR DCLG SECRETARY - RUTH KELLY
and the head of the LABOUR PARTY, TONY BLIAR himself.
NHHT has become an experiment of social science - experimenting with the discredited policies of the ex Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST GERARD LEMOS, the LABOUR PARTY homosexual protege and appointed Chairman of LABOUR PARTY LORD TOM SAWYER - who for POWER and TONY BLIAR betrayed UNISON, the union of choice of central goverment and local government employees - who have become all stitched up - on the altar of keeping quiet to keep a CORRUPT LABOUR PARTY government in power.
Now the LABOUR PARTY member ALAN COLE is CHAIRMAN of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.
At NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST there is a culture of BULLYING and HARASSMENT which is driving staff out - just like at the ODPM - the predecessor of DCLG which is just as bad as ODPM - under the head of OPUS DEI member, DCLG Secretrary of State, RUTH KELLY.
Last year, Deputy Prime Minister, John Leslie Prescott of Prescott Towers, Hull and his ministerial perks in return for 'keeping quiet about the housing scandal' paid for out of unaccountable taxpayers money from the Housing Corporation from his ODPM. He was severely criticised by a committee of MPs after it emerged that one in ten workers at his old department (ODPM) said that they had been BULLIED in the past year and one in twelve had experienced DISCRIMINATION.
The ignorant loud-mouthed dysfunctional 'not fit for purpose' ex P&O cross channel ferry steward (like the ferry 'SPIRIT OF FREE ENTERPRISE'???) who would roll beer barrels along the deck of his ship as his job had been to victual the ship and serve the officers their meals. He was allowed to keep his £133,000-a-year salary and his extremely generous perks, such as the vast DORNEYWOOD country estate and his palatial flat at ADMIRALTY HOUSE, together with access to his bevy of beauties like Tracey Temple. As long as the housing secret remained a secret - gerrymandering the vote to ensure TONY BLIAR remained in power.
There is a need to retain highly skilled employees. The most qualified were likely to leave. The senior management have been often described as contol freaks.
It is very difficult to work with them.
Their massive weakness is that they can't work with people.
The same can be said of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, which has been described by many of its good suffering tenants - many of whom are deliberately and unlawfully placed in unlawful rent arrears - as the authentic voice of TOTALITARIANISM.
Those who control NOTTING HIL HOUSING TRUST in the heart of what was the flagship borough of LABOUR due to their crass confrontation and total lack of consultation, the tenants decided - YES THE TENANTS DECIDED - that there would be a change of local government and there was - it was not so hard to achieve.
What tenants decided to achieve; the very same can be organised for a general election.
ALL the fault of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and its LABOUR LIES - its CALLOUS CONFRONTATION and its UNLAWFUL BEHAVIOUR.
NEW LABOUR has never easily truly tolerated MINORITIES which do not share its values - weren't fox hunters dismissed and victimised in the same way? - whatever the LIES and PR media spin from the overly well-paid commercial 24DASH.COM.
There is a sign of BLIAR's diminishing authority - he is being forced to cave in as he targets one minority after the other - alienating hundreds of thousands of good voters.
INTOLERANCE of ORTHODOXY
Those who claim to speak for us THINK like TYRANTS.
WHY?
THEY - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - and NEW LABOUR - ARE TYRANTS!!!
ALL OF THEM...
delroy
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST and their evil cowardly bulling of disabled tenants
21.02.2007 16:03
The poor man has been traumatised by the unlawful actions of Notting Hill Housing Trust which are evil cowardly and bullying.
Notting Hill Housing Trust have been abusing and confronting good tenants even us disbled tenants and we are sick of their evil. That is why we won't vote Labour. As Labour Party are directing Notting Hill Housing Trust through Alan Cole the Chairman and the cowardly Kate Davies who hides in the shadows and gets bullies to do her dirty work. She seems to be very good at getting her management to break the law.
As I made clear before, Sean Bryson has been set up by the Notting Hill Housing Trust and abused. The severity of his living conditions where he has suffered intolerably in his flat in diabolical disrepair in an effort by the chief executive to try to unlawfully evict him has amplified his problems with the landlords deliberately placing anti social neighbours next door has been integrated with discrimination inflicted on him by his landlord, Notting Hill Housing Trust. I believe this has driven him to the oppose the ideology of the Labour Party as a result of their continued confrontation against him. Notting HIll Housing Trust are well known to use a deliberate social engineering policy as put togeher by the ex chairman Gerard Lemos who used social engineering experiments on the captive tenants in Colville Ward as if they were playthings of some wicked Rachman landlord.
Notting Hill Housing Trust and its vile confrontation policies need to be exposed. Simply it is a way, as others have noted, to decant good tenants from social housing at social rents [Notting Hill Housing Trust] into commercial housing at commercial rents [Notting Hill Home Ownership]. This is also done by non existent entities set up under the Notting Hill Housing Group.
By the different entities the Notting Hill Home Ownership can transfer properties from the so called "charity" entity [Notting Hill Housing Trust] to the commercial entity [Notting Hill Home Ownership] and vice versa from the commercial entity to the social entity of the "Charitable" Trust and avoid terrible taxes that other businesses have to bear.
Tax Avoidance par excellence!!!
With a Labour Party Government Immunity from prosecution thrown in !!!
Sean Bryson should sue Notting Hill Housing Trust for breach of tort, breach of his tenancy contract, where the landlords promised to repair his flat and did not, for all his psychological injuries he has sustained as a result of all the unlawful harassment he has had to suffer from his wicked evil Rachman style landlords based in the leafy lane at Hammersmith Grove and he should be seriously compensated for all the many unlawful breaches of his Human Rights. He should seek substantial compensation based on medical evidence for how his previous good health has been destroyed by the senior management of Notting Hill Housing Trust. This was brought about as against so many other tenants by the incompetent female senior member of management from Servite Homes that has been the source of the orchestration of all of this illegality from a person who is meant to be in charge but never has the courtesy to respond to any letters of complaint from so many of the responsible tenants with legitimate complaints.
Notting HIll Housing Trust only understand about being sued through the courts or being the victim of justice.
charles evans
charles evans
HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE - "THE REACTION" TO COMPLAINTS AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
09.04.2007 16:55
It is sinking in a morass of spin and sleaze - most people call them LIES with a capital 'L' !
LABOUR is going into MELTDOWN - but those in the BLAIR bunker are fools!
They do not consult the good intelligent respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - no - they are such fools, they would rather drown in their own filth and vomit!
Most of the intelligent, good and respectable tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust are well aware that the discredited champion of spin & sleaze [lies & deceit?] at Notting Hill Housing Trust is "our dear leader" the elective dictator Mr Blair [Mr B.liar?] who indirectly controls Notting Hill Housing Trust.
But Blair's days are numbered. 3 MAY 2007 is very very fast approaching!
29 Connaught Square and 5 Archery Close behind it are awaiting for Mr Blair - was he not the biggest betrayer of Britain to ever be ensconced among the place of Tyburnia, west of the long straight Roman road now called the Edgware Road and under which the secret river of Tyburn flows, by Marble Arch where betrayers and traitors would traditionally be executed.
Local elections in Scotland, Wales and England fast approach.
But the discredited Blair's vessel of state in which is crewed all his acolytes, puppets and muppets - and who have sought secular sanctuary in his discredited betraying policies - has been holed irretrievably below the waterline. The ship is sinking fast, fast, fast.
The feedback from those elections are a litmus test of his premiership - it does not bear thinking about.
Blair is a weak vacillating coward and bully.
His performance over Iran has shown him for what he is - a fool.
He uses the wrong arguments - he attacks the wrong people!
We - all the good British people - from the monarch down - are all terrorists now!
Like the dodgy dossiers that never did exist that were concocted by the likes of John Scarlett and Jonathan Buchanan that scuttles away - did he not go to hide as a so-called Trustee at Notting Hill Housing Trust?
Spooky spooks and snoopy snoops - is that not what they all are?
State sponsored liars to make terrorists of us all.
What rubbish is this - what lies are these!
Blair is thus finished.
Blair will retire to ignominy.
Blair betrayed Britain.
Blair betrayed the British people - all of them!
As to Notting Hill Housing Trust - the 'secret' industry that utilises the poor and most vulnerable at industrial level to fuel a silent and extremely lucrative housing & property industry.
Is not 'the charity' a convenient charade to avoid paying tax?
Transfer the properties from charity to a commercial internal entity.
Just days ago, Ms Kate Davies (29/3/56) with other friends on the board of directors of Notting Hill Housing Trust set up 'Notting Hill Market Rent Limited' (9/2/2007) from £1,000 to £20,000,000 shares. Is this not a case of pure profit - pure greed?
Was this not unlawful?
Was this not a breach of trust?
But, Notting Hill Housing Trust is meant to be a charitable Trust?
It is not meant to mix commercial money with charity money?
What unlawful game is Ms Davies playing with money held on trust?
All directors are personally liable?
This breach of trust is it not worse than the unlawful activities of the notorious Peter Rachman of the area of Notting Hill, west London, out of which Notting Hill Housing Trust started 40 years ago, due to the unlawful abuse of tenants of west London?
Is it the case that Notting Hill Housing Trust has now been totally corrupted by deceitful and corrupt members of the Labour Party?
Spin and sleaze, lies and deceit, corruption, breach of trust, unacceptable and unlawful behaviour?
The directors/trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust are all members of the Labour Party.
The chairman [Alan Cole] is a member of the Labour Party.
The chief executive [Kate Davies] is a member of the Labour Party.
She was a special adviser of the Labour Party. What advice could she give?
Her only main qualification is a degree in sociology. What use could that have been to the Labour Party?
Was that how the 'social engineering' policies that were previously dreamed up by the evil mind of Adolf Eichmann, the evil Jew-hater were dreamed up and now used [with a slight twist - like the twisted minds that thought up this hate] to 'good effect' by Gerard Lemos and Ms Kate Davies?
Many of her colleagues describe her as vain and arrogant. They describe her cold steel blue eyes without an ounce of compassion or humanity in them. Why?
They describe her long blonde hair like some German Gauleiter madchen who appears, from what has been described about her by her colleagues, that she detests anyone who is Jewish or is gay. Is that true?
If so, Ms Davies should resign with immediate effect.
Is it true that Ms Davies has been putting in place Labour Party 'social engineering' policies?
Were such Labour Party policies not researched in the Colville Labour Ward of north Kensington in the north of the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [represented by the Labour MP for north Kensington & Regent's Park, Karen Buck] by Gerard Lemos [ex Commissioner of the Civil Service, ex Commissioner of the Audit Commission, ex Deputy Chairman of the British Council to Chairman Lord Neil Kinnock, ex Government Race Adviser - the way to 'stitch-up' people good and proper - no Freedom of Speech in Blair's Britain - always use the so-called 'Racist' excuse in order for the Labour Party to attack a member of the Labour Party who is an old age pensioner, as Gunther Gross was to discover!], the ex chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust, Gerard Lemos was he not the protege of Labour Lord Tom Sawyer?
Did not Ms Kate Davies describe such policies as: "good seeds sown by Gerard Lemos"?
As special adviser of the Labour Party, is that why the promotion of Ms Davies in any housing association was so unbelievably rapid. Not knowledge - but political patronage and nepotism. That is where Labour Lord Tom Sawyer (12/5/43) of 22 Inchmery Road, Catford, London SE6 2NE comes in [the ex chairman of the Labour Party and ex head of UNISON Union, ex National Union of Public Employees - did he not 'stitch-up' all the Union members in the priority to support Tony Blair at ALL costs?].
Labour Lord Tom Sawyer, did he not support the application of Ms Kate Davies [partner of Nick Johnson (Davies Johnson Limited - is it not a 'shell' company? incorporated on 27/2/2006)] to be chief executive at Notting Hill Housing Trust when his good friend, the then chief executive Labour Party member Peter Redman was discredited - whereupon, was he not paid a secret payment out of Notting HIll Housing Trust funds? Is it not the case that hundreds and hundreds of millions of pounds of unaccountable taxpayers money lie in Barclays Bank accounts held in trust under the name of Notting H(e)ll Housing Trust?
Is it not true that there was no investigation by the Labour Party member Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and was Ken Macdonald [who had no experience in prosecution work?] not appointed by Tony Blair as the senior partner of Matrix Chambers in Gray's Inn, where Cherie Booth/Blair works, as DPP the man who decides which entities get prosecuted - all totally political?
Was the Labour Party member Ken Macdonald not appointed by Mr Blair as DPP on the recommendation of Cherie Booth/Blair?
Is it not true that pillow-talk works wonders - especially when Cherie Booth/Blair makes the recommendation/s for high office?
Is it not true that the legal system in England and Wales is totally compromised?
Is it not true that Labour Party member Charles ['Fatty'] Falconer [ex flat mate of 'People's Princess' Tony Blair] was appointed to the most senior legal office of Lord Chancellor by Tony Blair in order to replace Derry Irvine [the man who was Labour Party Lord Chancellor and who was responsible for dictating to Peter 'Mandy' Mandelson as they crossed Parliament Square after ex leader of the Labour Party, the man of good morality and high principles, the idealistic and well respected John Smith's funeral at Westminster Abbey that Tony Blair was going to be the Leader of the Labour Party and Peter, Alastair and Jonathan thought that Derry needed to be brought down 'to reality' - as Derry Irvine likened himself to Henry VIII's Cardinal Wolsey - my friend spoke to him after the argument and Derry was embarassed to speak to him and only wanted to 'scuttle away' - what a difference to when we last met him and spoke with him!] after a heated argument between Blair and Irvine - his ex pupil master? "Boy" Blair is that not how he referred to "People's Princess" Tony?
Is it not the case that Charles Falconer was Tony Blair's ex flatmate? - talk about nepotism and cronyism!
Yet, Charlie Falconer knows that his days are numbered... there is some real bad blood in the Cabinet now. Isn't there?
John Reid PhD, the scotsman, has his ideas... Charles Falconer, BA, has his...
Jonathan Powell, chief of staff to Tony Blair, lives conveniently very close to Notting Hill Housing Trust, based at Hammersmith Grove, Hammersmith, London W6. Tony Blair's 'secret' unaccountable housing and property industry.
Is it not the case that Notting Hill Housing [Trust/Group/Home Ownership/Care Services/Market Rent Limited/etc.?] can avoid paying tax by transferring its very valuable properties from a charity to a commercial organisation.
The Solicitors used by Notting Hill Housing Trust are 'Devonshires' of Salisbury House, London Wall, London EC2M 5QY [Tel: 020-7628-7576].
But is it not the case that Notting Hill Housing Trust resort to the use of the Labour Party solicitors of choice of 'Glazer Delmar' solicitors of Peckham in London SE 15.
Why, use such a firm of solicitors in Peckham, London SE15 when Notting Hill Housing Trust is based in London W6?
Is it not the case that the partners of Glazer Delmar were Michael Glazer, Barbara Delmar and Sally Powell (who specialised in Wills and residential conveyancing)? All solicitors! But, is it not the case that Sally Powell is a Labour Party Councillor of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham? Is it not the case that Glazer Delmar of Peckham supports the Labour Party?
Is it not the case that all tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust are advised to instruct Glazer Delmar solicitors? But is it not the case that Notting Hill Housing Trust also instruct Glazer Delmar solicitors? But this is a fundamental breach of the professional rules of conduct of solicitors? Is it not a blatant breach of the strict inflexible legal rule that must be followed by ALL practising solicitors - namely, NOT to allow a CONFLICT OF INTEREST to arise?
So, what kind of firm of solicitors firm is Glazer Delmar of [223-229 Rye Lane] Peckham, London SE15 4TZ [Tel: 020-7639-8801]?
Do they not give money to the Labour Party?
Is it not the capital in London of lies and sectacular deceit? Is that why that particular place in Peckham was chosen?
Or has it got more to do with the Labour Party Councillor Dame Sally Powell, Labour Party member connection?
Is it not the case that Sally Powell is a leading member of the Labour Party?
Is it not the case that the partner of Sally Powell is Iain Coleman - ex Labour MP for Hammersmith & Fulham?
Was Iain Coleman not removed by the election of Conservative Party MP Greg Hands - with huge help from angry, unlawfully abused good and respectable tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust - who have been treated with absolute contempt by the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust under the [out of lawful] control [which has been identified as "not fit for purpose" Labour Party wrecks who seek to confront and harass not to consult and inform with respect. [After 38 (thirty eight) years that the Labour Party totally controlled the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham and it was such a safe borough it was referred to by the Labour Party as the 'flagship' borough!
But now arrogance, dictatorship, vanity, cowardice, confrontatioin and harassment has led to Human Rights abuses of good respectable tenants beneficiaries of the trust.
Indeed, it appears that matters have got so bad by that the out-of-control chief executive who appears to be acting unlawfully so that good respectable tenants are now taking the abusive out of lawful control senior management who will not listen, consult or treat the good tenants with respect that many tenants have gone to court. Human Rights abuses they have shown.
The good tenants have asserted if the management were intelligent and wise they would have appointed the intelligent tenants to the board or sorted matters out reasonably.
However, the directors appear to be extremely foolish and seem to want a massive confrontation against good respectable tenants and seem to relish the possibility of massive adverse publicity and it appears the directors seem to relish the prospect of resorting to unlawful behaviour?
Why do the directors not apologise and give the good respectable tenants decent flats - not tiny spaces, fit for a mouse, with flats in massive unlawful disrepair?
If the chief executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust, Ms Kate Davies, not living at palatial surroundings in a luxurious mansion building close to the Edgware Road by Marble Arch at Flat 2, Corner Lodge, 107 Sussex Gardens, London W2 2RU, some 500 yeards from Connaught Square [west side], to where Tony Blair is moving [29 Connaught Square and 5 Archery Close] after the major local elections on 3 May 2007 - which will see him finally fractured to dust - to what he was from his beginning?
BUT good respectable tenants were they not treated en bloc with total disrespect, absolute abuse, unacceptable confrontation and unlawful Harassment [Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Breaches of Human Rights] by the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust?
Is it not the case that Sally Powell is a leading member of the Labour Party National Executive Committee (NEC) of the Labour Party that controls the Labour Party?
Is it not the case that Sally Powell was made a Labour Party 'Dame' by Tony Blair [for her 'services' to Housing and 'ancillary services']?
Is it not the case that Sally Powell is a leading Councillor of the Labour Party and of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham?
Urgent Questions need to be answered immediately...
So, if the Trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust were wise, they would appoint to the board of Trustees some of the most responsible and intelligent tenant beneficiaries of the charitable trust to advise the board of trustees - but they are not, they will not.
The board of trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust - a tentacle [is it not the lucrative carbuncle that is there but not meant to be seen for what it is - the industrial means to exploit the most vulnerable tenant beneficiaries through the agencies of housing benefit twinned to the funding conduit of the local authority through unaccountable access to unaccountable taxpayers money siphoned from central government - ODPM/DCLG - Housing Corporation QUANGO oversees for the Labour Party Executive but not for Parliament - Audit Commission QUANGO oversees for the Labour Party Executive but not for Parliament - in addition to through what was the unaccountable Labour Party controlled 'Hammersmith and Fulham Homes Limited' which links into the unaccountable Labour Party controlled Notting Hill Housing Trust?] of the Labour Party.
The Labour Party deceit is all done in order to gerrymander the votes of communities - All in a deceitful way to try to 'stitch-up' the vote!
For the Labour Party Trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust to confront and not to consult indicates that the Labour Party Trustees on the Board of Trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust are all fools.
It further indicates that the Trustees are acting recklessly.
What is more, it indicates that the Board of Trustees are all acting unlawfully as Trustees of a charitable Trust.
The very same attitude is deployed by the Labour Party.
It and they are tired, it and they have served their time, it is now the Party of yesterday!
The Labour Party has corrupted us, betrayed us and deceived us all!
The Labour Party members ignore their legal responsibilities and would rather unlawfully confront and harass good tenant beneficiaries of a Trust, rather than listen and genuinely consult all tenant beneficiaries in good faith.
There is no good faith in all the actions of Trustees and senior management of Notting Hill Housing Trust.
Just as the good respectable tenant beneficiaries have been continually harassed since the chairmanship of ex Labour Party chairman, Labour Party Lord Tom Sawyer who was given a peerage by Tony Blair and then nominated to be chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust in 1998. When Lord Tom Sawyer of 22 Inchmery Road, Catford, south east London was discredited, he was replaced by his well groomed Labour Party friend and Labour Party member, Gerard Lemos of 7 Bisham Gardens, Highgate, north London, who he oversaw to be made Deputy Chairman of the British Council under Labour Party Lord Neil 'Kinnochio' Kinnock, the chairman of the British Council.
On Sawyer's recommendation, Lemos was appointed as Government Race Adviser, Commisioner of the Civil Service and Commissioner of the Audit Commission - so that Lord Tom Sawyer would not be embarassed on his hurried and untimely departure from the chairmanship of Notting Hill Housing Trust when over 45 Trust properties [those that were known about] of the 19,000 properties comprised in the housing stock that were misappropriated.
Under the present chairman of the lacklustre poor leadership of Alan Cole - a Labour Party member, the chief executive Ms Davies continues her unlawful harassment of the most vulnerable tenants in order to seek vacant possession of valuable properties forming part of the nineteen thousand (19,000) properties that form part of perhaps the biggest housing stock located in west London and has automatic acces to unaccountable taxpayers money without any questiones asked - all funnelled from unaccountable QUANGO's.
All deviously clever!
Mr Blair will retire to 29 Connaught Square and 5 Archery Close, north of the north-east part of Hyde Park, west of the straight Roman road of Edgware Road [under which pasases the 'secret' river of Tyburn] by Marble Arch, the place that was Tyburn, in the City of Westminster.
Mr Blair may indeed install many CCTV, panic alarms and motion sensors as part of his 24 hour protection arrangements, but the feng shui is bad and Mr Blair has no idea of its negative symbolism nor - clearly - the historical, numerologic, symbolic or spiritual significance!
Notting Hill Housing Trust is now not fit for purpose.
Ms Davies is not fit for purpose.
Questions need to be asked publicly.
Human Rights abuses are part of the stock-in-trade of the Labour Party.
As with the 5 (five) wars started by Mr Blair.
The Pope - Pope Benedict XVI (16) has castigated the evil tyrant of Mr Blair who has done everyting to weaken spiritual values in Britain today, supported by the 'Wicked Witch' of the Labour Party who pretends to be the greatest apologist for Human Rights, but in truth is its biggest supporter of her husband - "the warmonger-in-chief"!
The Pope, the British Cardinal and the Archbishop of Canterbury would identify the "People's Princess" Mr Blair and Mrs Blair as nothing short of worshippers of the Devil - 'JABULON'!
Was the Book of Revelation - setting out the world's evils - not inspired by Jewish priests to explain to us today the behaviour of Mr and Mrs Blair [the lawyers/liars] and the true meaning of the Devil - Vile - Evil they have created, supported and have they not held up their litany of crimes, unrest and instability as worthy of our support?
Suffering, evil, injustice and death, especially when it strikes the innocent, such as children, the disabled, the elderly and the most vulnerable, who are victims of war and terrorism of sickness and hunger and bestial abuse in their housing at the hands of the Labour Party support of the evil tactics of Mr Blair and his partners in crime, Mrs Blair, Labour Lords Sawyer, Soley, Falconer, Goldsmith, Princess 'Mandy' Mandelson, Jonathan Powell [Blair's chief of staff], Alastair ['spinning', self-interested, self-indulgent, self-assertive, very little self-examination, cynical, blaming others, constantly endeavouring to put other people down, violation of Human Rights, the exploitation of people who are powerless, the lover of abusing power and the person who seems to have made a career out of lying and deceit?] Campbell, Mr Cole and the chief executive, Ms Davies - all members of the discredited Labour Party?
The Labour Party must die - we witness it is now dying...
As the puppets of the Labour Party were ALL fools - they never consulted - they never listened - they were too self -obsessed - vain, arrogant and wanted to abuse others who were the most vulnerable in society, in their self-indulgent bid to seek power through the promotion of evil at every single turn...
John Smith
Notting Hill Housing Scam Trust
10.05.2007 23:09
Your theory of the housing scam was correct.
Judy
LET'S BEAT NHH HOLOCOUST, MAFIA ORG/T.BLAIR BABY IN THE COURT
26.06.2007 21:38
Hi People,
I need your help.
My name is Nada and unfortunately just yesterday I found the web site and have read the very disturbing testimonies from Sebastian an others.
If I only new, in 2003/4, how to communicate, how to find the victims of NHHMafia, Criminals, Scam Fascist, Nazis organization that killing people, children on daily basis, I would not be in position to lose my body. I almost lost my body due to maltreatment, mental torture, abuse, harassment by NHHCrime org only because I was ill then. I was diagnosed wit cancer 2001 and I recovered as I did not want to go to Medical Mafia to butcher or fry me with radiation or chemotherapy.
To my Tragedy, 2003 I become the tenant of NHH Crime Ass. I still was recovering emotionally from the cancer experience of 2001 and due to infestation in shed, so-called flat, heavy flooding, three times in three years, due to block gutters, abuse by SS/Gestapo Officers Paul Baron, Gilbert Malin, John Franco, Trisha Dricolly and mafia t in the Local Government, the cancer came back in 2005. This was thousand times more difficult then bloody war in ex-Yugoslavia.
It seems to me that Nazi and their Concentration Camps and Holocaust ideology has never died. It has been just passed over here and Josef Mangle program is fully implemented in Notting Hill Housing/Modern Holocaust Org and similar so called housing organization. Actually, the old Nazi would be jealous on PERVERTS sophistication of killing by Not ting Hill Housing Felonies.
People, In this country they are killing people as nobody protecting us, people. Police do not protect us. Police just collect money from us for them. Police protect them, mafia, high class killers like Not ting Hill Felonies Association.
On the top of that Medical Mafia in The Royal Mars den Hospital, "Dr" Gary Brown-Josef Mangle, injected me with some, still to me unknown, chemicals without my consent. I was under total anesthesia and could not help myself. That chemicals still lingering through my right side of the body.
Anyhow, Thanks only to God, Sup rime Being, I am alive.
In this, so called, civilized country they are killing people, English, Muslim, Irish, Black, Polish, Jewish etc, etc, because they are ill, old, disable, black, poor, disadvantaged. This is real!! This is reality and they are accusing other countries how they are bad. Everybody is bad for this country except them.
I wonder whether you can help me as I have to go to court against Nehemiah Org. I am representing myself as Legal Mafia, lawyers are stealing Legal Aid money and have no intention to represent people in court. They also make deal with Nighthawks Org. Now, I have o prepare preppier documents, evidence I have and with the statement submit it to the court and to barrister of NHHThugs Org until 27/06/2007.
I am panicking as there is no much time left and want TO WIN against them. The trial is on 13 August 2007. I have thoughts between and thinking whether to flee this country and ask for asylum in North Korea or Iraq as I believe people have more chance to survive than here with all of this hidden massive abuse and to drive people into death.
But again, I do not want to give up, want try to win and to see whether any judge in this country has the balls to confront Not ting Hill Housing Thugs, therefore all other immoral individuals, so-called Lords, PM, MPs and other ministers, who have stocks in NHHMafia Organization who are nothing else than the perverts enjoying listening to and watching people bring abuse.
I want my case might to provoke the Judge to try at least to do something Abbot Nighthawks and bring justice this time. I need you, as witness.
WILL YOU BE WILLING TO COME AS WITNESSES IN THE COURT AGAINST NOTTING HILL HOUSING S SCAM ASSOCIATION. PLEASE DO NOT BE AFRAID AS THEY AND NOBODY CAN POSSESS YOU.
I pennyless do not have money at all but want fight as I did surviveas constant alertness,constant willingness to fight back, THERE IS NO OTHER PRICE. Not only with NHHTugs, Felonies but against everything that stopping GOOD people to live and survive.
I am going to BEG Mr Michael Mansfild , a Barrister and a good God Living Human Beingto HELP me in the court. If you have any idea just let me know I will APRECIATE it a great deal.
You can call me on my mobile as it is only telephone I have: 07817982748 or if you want I can come to you or...
Kind Regards, Nada
46 Warwick Road, Concentration Camp, London SW5 9EH
This the letter I wrote to Mr N Baker. He did not help me and he bypassed killing attempt by Medical Mafia. But still think he is OK.
Mr Norman Baker MP
House of Parliament
London SW1A 0AA
18/04/2007
46 Warwick Road
Concentration Camp London SW5 9EH
Dear Mr Baker,
I am writing to you because I admire your quality as a good MP and as a good human being and also because I am an ex-member of LD. Even though I am not in your constituency, we are not lucky enough to have someone like you here; I do know you will read and take this letter seriously.
I think we all have responsibility to make this country free of fascism and restore freedom. I cannot sit back on a spectator basis, particularly after being victim of evil, and watch the country go downhill.
To me a definition of personal integrity is: what you have observed and have courage to say what you have observed.
In this country, I have seen and experienced that you have, unfortunately, government funding institutions with covert projects, strategy and policy to destroy, to impose fear, to abuse, to torture, to harass, to drive people to suicide, to kill people which remind me of what I have learned and read about third rich theories, models and scenarios of racial purity and liquidation of old, ill, poor, wounded, inferior…I, as a VICTIM of their actions, almost lost my body. I escaped slaughter.
I have learned, government funding institutions with the same DNA, just mention few, “Social” Housing, cancer industry, psychology, psychiatry, institutions, so-called, charity organisation, with private equity of hundreds of hundreds of millions of pounds like Notting Hill Housing Crime/Scam Association, then Nucleus, and other free, so-called, Community Legal Centres, so-called lawyers, are one of the chains to reduce people’s legal rights, rights to justice, to control population, i.e. to reduce it even though this country is not over populated. .
The “doctor” control scenario uses the psychiatrist’s (insane themselves) favourite pain, brain cutting and electro shocking, mind destroying drugs, cancer industry favourite radiation, frying, butchering, slaughtering or given slow-kill injection without peoples knowledge and consent, (like in my case in the Royal Marsden Hospital) if the individuals are from “social” housing, poor, old, black or if individuals got very perceptive, like me, and started exposing their brutality and felonies.
If the policy, strategy in this country is the worst one for childcare there is no surprise how “godfathers” and felons in local authorities and other central government funding horror institutions like Notting Hill Housing Crime/Scam Association care about vulnerable. They and their friends in Local Authority putting ill people together with criminals, paedophiles, drug dealers and etc in order to reduce their survival i.e. to kill them. These “godfathers” mafia, felons control Socialised Institutions, Social Housing, Old People’s Home, Hospitals, “Rehabilitation” Centres and etc. “Rehabilitation” means you cannot get out alive or wont get out till you stop resisting.
Occasionally some of these VICTIMS manage to crawl, wounded, to the side of the forces of freedom and regain their health through natural methods eating and living and re-enter the game of beautiful life.
The suppressive institutions, like “doctors”, legal drug dealers that drugging even our children with mind destroying drugs, Notting Hill Housing Crime/Scam Association, “godfathers”, small class of technocrats in local and other central governments funding institutions, keep people subdue, poor, ignorant, underfed, unhealthy, without justice, and legally destroy, subdue, suppress, kill, slather, the individuals, the basic components of a civilization, families, groups, black, they even destroy governments, destroy life, for suppressive reason of their own. And after that they make a cake for their children. And in suppressive society this criminal behaviour inside and outside government, is what succeeds and get rewarded and as a result we see them increasing in wealth while good and nation sink in poverty.
With Notting Hill Housing Scam, Crime Association I have learned not only they are shrewd and well financed but also that they have covert projects of concentration camps, bedlams, discriminations, suppression, oppression, subdue, and to kill. The Homo sapiens, creators, of this covert projects in Notting Hill Housing Scam Ass like to subdue, to control others, disadvantage with terror or deceit or kill other human being, misfortunate ones, which disturb their daily lives but they do not want to have to cope with the moral and religious issues which such overt act on their part might increase, rise. Therefore, they assign unerringly the dirty work to others, and so-called support officers, SS officers, so as to keep the blood from their hands. When them, Notting Hill Housing Crime Ass and the “godfathers”- technocrats in local authority asked why they do this to people, they do not answer because they know what they and their techniques, strategies are doing to people.
Yes, if you are let your body to get ill, as stupidly I did, if you are old, black, poor, vulnerable, simple on thin edge, if you are afraid and quail with fear, you end up with the institutions and concentration camps, prisons, bedlams, so-called, social housing and you end up in inexorable hands of “godfathers” in local authority and Notting Hill Housing Scam Association.
They want to have absolute control and access and keep track on anything and everything in your life. They want every aspect of tenants’ lives to be controlled. My clothing, my mind, my finance, what I eat, what I have, whom I have, whom I live with, my life style, even my make up is monitored by these felons. Non-criminals do not go about intervening in others people world, universes.
This is the face of evil that wants monopoly on people’s life. They would suck life out of people and their appetite is enormous. They want enslave people like herds of cattle and milk them whenever they wanted. Also, they want tenants to become their property too, to become part of them that adds to their strength and minimize resistance.
Probably the worst thing that can happen to ill, poor, black, old, vulnerable is to be placed in the institutions, bedlams, created all over the town, country by Notting Hill Crime and Scam Association and similar associations and local authorities, and in atmosphere normally provided for them by the state, government. Non-ill, non-black, and rich likewise a healthy elephants wouldn’t survive for too long in this environment and with their torturers. It would be far kinder to kill them immediately and completely, and no partially.
I did not know that I will ever experience the lurid I have experienced in this civilizes country?!!! Thanks to God, to S., Supreme Being I escaped slaughter, and I survived. Now, it is my responsibility with other good people and groups, to do something to prevent others from these criminals. Why be a casualty—learn first.
I have notice that lawyers I have been meeting are morally corrupted. They are stealing money from the legal aid and have no intention to represent people on legal aid in court properly. And their arrogance is beyond believe. They are just manipulator of truth and have no slightest awareness of other people’s universes. Actually, I have met some nice people in the profession of law, like Mr M. Mansfield, Justice Moses but for these kind professionals with moral and integrity, you need a lot, a lot of money.
Also, I have learned that only wealthy can afford justice. The “little” fellow doesn’t have hundreds thousand pounds to fight unjust of those in power as everything is fixed that you can not win. Until there is justice for “little” people, not just for rich, there will be criminals, corps, and consequently, I can see very soon, riots that can easily swell into complete red revolution.
Injustice is not something in which any man in power should ever trade. It is not just immoral or sin. It is suicide. Also, until justice applies to all, until no longer costs a tenth of millions to get to an upper court, the government is in risk and danger, equal danger to nuclear “weapons.”
This is an example of poor cow. The poor cow produces milk, produce more cows, and even meat. By being a producing animal, the cow is make to surrender the lot, she doesn’t need her milk, cannot use her calves and is also made to surrender her own body for meet or medical experiments. In return gets a sloppy food, barking dogs and abuse.
Sentient or not, intelligent or stupid, the cow yet sets us a fine example of the PERFECT CITIZEN OF Britain.
The perfect citizen is one who demands nothing and even surrenders his/her body on demand.
People saying there is nothing you can do about this. It is the system. Of course I do not agree, as I believe support to good people from good police, good judges is crucial. Judges and good lawyers are engine that drives the machine and power of justice that make it, justice possible.
Dear Mr Baker, thank you for reading this letter and also looking forward to hearing from you.
With affinity,
Nada Vorotovic .
P.S. I do not want write to “my” MP as I do not know what he is here for.
Nada
e-mail:
nmontenero8@yahoo.com
nottinghill housing trust
20.07.2007 16:09
elaine
nothinghill liers...more like!!
23.08.2007 13:20
DEAR TENANTS
BRENT HOUSING PARTNERSHIP IS A A.L.M.O.
THIS STANDS FOR ARMS LENGHT MANAGERMENT ORGANISATION. THEY WERE BROUGHT IN TO OVER SEE THE 2005 DECENT HOMES PROJECT AS BENT COUNCIL CANT BE TRUSTED WITH LARGE SUMS OF MONEY.
WE ARE UNDER THE CONTROL OF B.H.P YET WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE 2005 UPGRADE TO MEET THE DECENT HOMES STARDARDS...WHY! BECAUSE THE THEN COURRUPTED BENT LABOUR COUNCIL ALONG WITH BENTS HOUSING DIRECTOR... MARTIN CHEESEMAN CONSPIRED WITH NOTTINGHILL HOUSING TRUST..SORRY LAIRS TO REDEVELOP THE BARHAM PARK ESTATE. BEHIND CLOSED DOORS THE DEAL WAS SIGNED AND DONE... THE PLANS WERE IN PLACE FOR TOWER BLOCKS AT THE FRONT OF THE ESTATE AS PART OF THE GRAND DESIGN CONSISTING OF 600 FLATS IN PLACE OF THE 214 FLATS PRESENT. AND ALL THAT REMAINED WAS THE PRETENCE OF TENANT INVOLVEMENT WHICH STARTED WITH THE VOTE..WE WERE MISLED TO BELIEVE THAT 50% OF TENANTS VOTED FOR NOTTINGHILL TRUST..SORRY, LAIRS.. THIS WOULD HAVE REPERSENTED 107 TENANTS OUT OF THE 214 PRESENT AT THE TIME ON THIS ESTATE. WHEN INFACT IT WAS 35 TENANTS OUT OF 70 TENENTS WHO ATTENTED A OPEN DAY MEETING THAT WAS UNDER PUBLICIZED TO WHICH WAS BENT COUNCILS INTENSION!!!
SUCH AN IMPORTANT MEETING AND THE MORJORITY OF TENANTS UNAWARE!!!
WELL WE BECAME AWARE TO THE DECEPTION AND LIES TAKING PLACE AND HAD TWO VOTES TAKEN ON NOTTINGHILLS TOWER BLOCK DESIGN AND NOTTINGHILLS INVOLMENT IN THE FUTURE OF THIS ESTATE. WE HAD OVER 160 VOTES ON BOTH BALLOTS. FIRST AGAINST OVER DEVELOPMENT,.. MORE FLATS = MORE PEOPLE PLACING GREATER DEMAMAND ON LIMITED SERVICES- SCHOOLS/ DOCTORS NOT TO MENTION INCREASED CONGESTION. AS WELL AS CRIME AND FEAR..
THE SECOND WAS A VOTE OF NO CONFINDENCE, DUE TO THEM BEING LIERS AND UNDERHANDED, AND TO REMOVE NOTTINGHILL IN ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ON THIS ESTATE.
WE HAD THE SUPPORT OF THE BENT LIBRAL DEMOCRATE PARTY WHO CARRIED OUR CAUSE IN NEWS LETTERS..YET HAVING TAKEN POWER OF THE COUNCIL IT SEEMS THEY LIKE ANY OTHER POLITICIAN ARE JUST A LOAD OF BULLSHITTING LIERS. YES PAUL LOPER IS A BULLSHITTER AND I STATED THIS TO HIM AT THE MEETING HELD AT THE BAPTIST CHURCH HALL...I SAID THEN “ YOUR A BULLSHITTER LOPER “ AND I SAY IT AGAIN. MEAN WHILE BOB WARLTON IS OVER SHADOWED BY BULLSHITTING LOPER WHICH SHOWS HIM TO BE SPINELESS ! SAY ONE THING AND DO ANOTHER,..... DOUBLE STANDARDS GO HAND IN HAND WITH THIS LOT!!
MEAN WHILE ITS BEEN STATED THAT B.H.P ARE INTERESTED IN TAKEN US OVER AND REDEVELOPING THIS ESTATE. THOUGH THE CATCH IS ANY DESIGN WILL BE FUNDED NOT BY THE COUNCIL OR GOVERNMENT BUT BY NOTTINGHILL HOUSING.
B.H.P ARE IN EFFECT A PROPERTY COMPANY WITH OUT ANY FUNDS OF ITS OWN. IT IS A BACK DOOR WAY BACK ON TO THIS ESTATE FOR NOTTINGHILL. AND A FINANCIAL FUTURE FOR B.H.P AS A PROPERTY DEVELOPER IN ITS OWN RIGHT.
SO THE DECEPTION IS ALL ABOUT TO START AGAIN...AND IT STARTS WITH THE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE QUESTIONNAIRE 2007 WHICH WAS POSTED TO EVERY ONE EARLIER THIS YEAR. THIS QUESTIONNAIRE IS DESIGNED TO HIGHLIGHT THE MAYBANK OPEN SPACE AS UNDER USED AND EARMARKED FOR REDEVELOPMENT. B.H.P WILL STATE THAT 350 FLATS WILL BE BUILT IN PLACE OF THE 214 ON THIS ESTATE AND THIS WOULD BE TRUE...YET NOTTINGHILL WILL OPEN UP A SEPERATE DEVELOPMENT ON THE MAYBANK TO RAISE THE NEEDED FUNDS TO FINANCE THE WHOLE PROJECT.....B.H.P INVOLVEMENT IS NOT A GIFT HORSE IN OUR TIME OF NEED BUT A TROJAN HORSE DESIGNED TO DECIEVE. THERE HAS BEEN SOME BRAIN STORMING AND SLAPPING OF BACKS. AMOUNGST NOTTINGHILL LIERS AND BENT COUNCIL. DESPRATE CHEESEMAN AND B.H.P THE TROJAN HORSE....THEY HAVE FOUND A WAY TO FOOL US...OR SO THEY THOUGHT!!! THEY WILL TRY AND BREAK US WITH DEALS AND PROMISES TO SIGN AWAY OUR RIGHTS AND OUR HOMES...WHICH LAST TIME ROUND WERE SHOWN TO BE JUST LIES AND DECEPTIONS.. JOHN DIGGINS....
BARHAM PARK TENANT AND ACTION GROUP DIRECTOR..KEEPING YOU INFORMED AND IN THE KNOW.
John Diggins
nothinghil liers
23.08.2007 14:40
THE 3RD EPERSODE OF THE BARHAM PARK STORY.
THE TENANTS HAVING ON TWO OCCANSIONS BROUGHT DOWN THE EVIL EMPIRE OF NOTTINGHILL ARE SHOCKED TO DISCOVER PLANS BY THE VILLIANS BENT COUNCIL AND DESPRATE CHEESEMAN TO TURN TO THE DARK FORCES OF NOTTINGHILL LIERS IN A CUNNING PLAN TO TAKE OVER THE BARHAM PARK ESTATE.
THIS IS A STORY OF MORE LIES AND DECEPTIONS A SEEMILY NEVER ENDING NIGHTMARE FOR THE TENANTS OF BARHAN PARK ESTATE WHICH STARTED OUT AS A REQUEST FOR DOUBLE GLASSING AND TURNED INTO A NIGHTMARE OF DEMOLISSION..TOWERBLOCKS...AND THE LOSS OF RIGHTS AS COUNCIL TENANTS... STARRING BENT COUNCIL..DESPRATE CHEESEMAN...NOTTINGHILL LIERS AND LEAD ROLE AND GUEST APPEARRENCE.... BENT HOUSING PARTNERSHIP AS THE TROJAN HORSE.
THE EVIL EMPIRE OF NOTTINGHILL HAVING BEEN DEFEATED FOR THE SECOND TIME BY THE TRUTH CRAWLED BACK FROM WHENS THEY CAME... WHILE TENANTS REJOICED IN THERE VICTORY TO REMAIN COUNCIL TENANTS....A NEW DAY A NEW COUNCIL LED BY THOSE WHO STOOD BY US!!!! SURELY OUR NIGHTMARE WAS OVER!
THINK AGAIN PART 3 COMING TO YOUR HOME SOON. ITS THE NIGHTMARE THAT NEVER ENDS...............
John Diggins