Updates on the Council cash abuse in Brick Lane London E1 area vote fraud allegations -
will be published today [Friday 5 May 2006] and over the weekend on#

 http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikaronline.html

 http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikaronline/today.html

this is the third time I've read a piece about the tunnel and for the third time I can't make head or tail of it. The links offered in the comments don't help either. The grammar is so absurdly poor that it is impossible to understand even the vague gyst of what you are all writing about.

Please post clearly,

Frustrated reader.

You are absolutely right!


Your 'name' is apt!


Keith!


That name is the subject of such angst!



Do you understand angst?


Annoyance, impatience!


As has been noted before, you are probably 'related' to 'Keith'.


Or may be you are related to 'Michael' and taking it as far as he did. Or tried to.

Whatever brings you ‘repeatedly’ to our posts, you are evidently prejudiced and you are intending to waste time


If you are genuine and not related to Michael Keith or any of his co-promoters of CrossRail and you are not a disguised punter posting for CrossRail, or similar, then send a genuine e-mail message to our legal email address and we shall give you all the factual answers to any genuinely outstanding factual questions.

We do not think that publishing the entire data base of Khoodeelaar ! campaign on Crassrail will be a reasonable thing to do in response to your unidentifiable ‘PORBELMS’.

Michael Keith comes to mind here, as your posts contain the dissembling language he used on many occasions.

He too feigned ignorance of the very problem that he had helped to cause.


The problems included the inviting of a big tunnelling, hole-digging problem on to the Eats End of London.


The problems are contained in the Hosue of Commons bill, known as the 'Crossrail Bill'.


It is not hard to find. Visit the House of Commons web sites and you will eventually access it.


Also, read some of the letters, demands and calls that khoodeelaar have published both on the Khoodeelaar web sites and elsewhere on the world wide web and in the conventional modes and forms of the media.


You are also very clearly a racist, otherwise you would not be talking about grammar when you are lying about the lack of facts in our posts

We do not do anything if we don’t update the fact files.

That is the main purpose behind our posts.

To say that I am racist because I insist on clarity is as baffling as your writing. To say that because my first name is the same as ex-councillor Keith's surname is equally silly. I don't know why I'm even bothering to reply accept that I am interested and concerned as a resident of Tower Hamlets and someone who doesn't want to see the Cross Link Tunnel uproot communities and damage our environment, or see corrupt officials line their pockets from the project.

I want to understand you. That's why I keep returning to your posts. However, your sloppy writing makes that difficult. Why you think it's racist to expect you to at least get your writing sub-edited once (unless you are a one-man organisation?) I don't know.

Get over yourself.

Khoodeeelaar! No to crossrail hole - that is simple enough to understand.

The next logical thing for any genuinely interested part to do is to follow the links or the logic of the statement.

We have published thousands of factual items about what we are doing, why we are doing it and when we are doing it. Like we have just published on this site
[ http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikaronline/today.html]

The details of the next khoodeelaar demonstration

You keep referring to our alleged writing style.

You must be either faking it or you must be lacking in basic cognitive abilities. You can’t be missing the point of the campaign because of any alleged absence of any alleged acceptable stylistic components from our writing.

It is for this reason that we think and say that you must be a phoney or worse.

That is really why we are asking you why you keep returning to our posts.

Read the statment and updates and you will see what the facts are.

You may decide to disagree with the facts, in which case you should let us know what evidence you are relying on. We can then accept you as a genuine critic.

But we cannot see any evidence of that in your repeated remarks about things that are pathetic and irrelevant.

If we took your remarks seriously then we could overwhelm you with references to show just how wrong you are.

We shall continue to camapgn to stop crossrail hole being dub in the brick lane London e1 area.

As we shall campaign to stop a crossrail station at Whitechapel.

We have stated that a crossrail station at Whitechapel is not needed because that is uneconomic and not one that the local economy demands.

The local community ahs not asked for it and the local economy has not shown a demand for it.

There is also no evidence that a crossrail station at Whitechapel is cost-effective in the macro-economic context either.

These are complex concepts that require familiarity with related spheres and sources of knowledge.

I too have been reading these ramblings with ( very ) poor pseudo-legalese. Khoodelar does not actually seem to have any copntent to his 'legal papers' . It'sall a bit of a rant fromsomebody i feel must have mental health problems. There are plenty of non-sequiteurs in his arguments and he seseems to be posting unsder several different names. Yes it's all shit mate just like the other communites that have been trampled on time and again their and all over. Racist I don't think so.

I like the rants against Xrail big business


Also like the idea that Xrail or their agents have no arguments except to post
pisspoor rubbish calling the community movement against cROSSRAIL a mere rant.

we need more righteous rants in this country and less lies from the govt and their psy operating posters

The London wide campaign against CrossRail hole Bill attacks on the East End of London is meeting this weekend and the first agreed manifesto will be published on Sunday 7 January 2007 on the web site below

 http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarpress/innercitiesbritain.html