Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Five more US soldiers charged in rape-murder atrocity in Iraq

Kate Randall | 10.07.2006 17:16 | Anti-militarism

Four active duty US soldiers have been charged with participation in the “rape and murder of a young Iraqi woman and three members of her family,” the US military stated in a news release on Sunday. A fifth soldier is accused of dereliction of duty for failing to report the crimes.

The five are charged with conspiring with Steven D. Green, a former private first class who was charged July 3 in a US civilian court. The rape and murders occurred March 12 in Mahmoudiya, 20 miles south of Baghdad. Green, who has pled not guilty, could face the death penalty if convicted.

The soldiers are charged with entering the family’s home, raping the girl—whose age has been placed variously at 15 and 20—shooting her and three members of her family to death, including a young child, and then burning the corpse of the rape victim and attempting to set the home on fire.

This atrocity, coming on the heels of other recent war crime revelations, is rapidly assuming in the minds of Iraqis—as well as people in the US and around the world—a symbolic significance: like Abu Ghraib, it is seen as a concentrated expression of the nightmare of killing, destruction and terror unleashed by the United States government on the people of Iraq. It is, moreover, an expression of both the brutalization and demoralization of the US forces who are seeking to subjugate a population determined to resist foreign occupation.

The active duty soldiers charged in the case have not been identified. They face further investigation and a hearing to determine whether the evidence merits a court martial. All are members of the 502nd Infantry Regiment, a unit of the 101st Airborne Division, based in Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

The Mahmoudiya case, the latest in a series of atrocities committed by US soldiers against Iraqi civilians, has outraged Iraqis not only because of the brutality of the crime, but also because US forces operate with immunity from prosecution by Iraqi courts.

What is particularly shocking and sickening about this incident, beyond its savagery, is its premeditated character. It cannot be attributed to an eruption of homicidal rage at the death of a comrade, or a disproportionately violent response to a real or perceived threat. Prosecutors contend that the perpetrators, who were manning a checkpoint through which the girl regularly passed, had singled her out in advance of the attack, and that they changed from their battle fatigues before setting out to rape her in her home.

The girl’s mother, Fakhriya Taha Muhsen, was so worried about a possible attack by American soldiers that relatives suggested that the family come and live in an empty house near them. But before the move could be carried out, the soldiers came.

There are many indications of a deliberate cover-up of the incident by American officers. For more than three months, the US military officially attributed the incident to Sunni “insurgent activity,” an assertion that is dubious on its face, as the victims were themselves Sunnis.

An investigation was initiated only after soldiers from the unit came forward following the discovery in early June of the mutilated bodies of two soldiers from the same unit who had been captured at a military checkpoint by insurgents.

Also, Green left the 101st Airborne after serving only 11 months with an honorable discharge as a result of what military officials have referred to as an “anti-social personality disorder.” It has not been explained why this resulted in an honorable rather than a general discharge from the military.

According to the federal affidavit against Green, he and at least two other soldiers targeted the young victim, Abeer Qasim Hamza, for more than a week. On the day of the murders, they drank alcohol, changed their clothes to avoid detection, and abandoned their US military checkpoint. One soldier was left behind to monitor the radio and two others went with Green to the victims’ house, about 200 yards from their post.

In the affidavit, soldiers are quoted telling federal investigators that Green shot the young woman’s relatives, including her mother and father and a child of about five years of age, raped the young woman, and then fatally shot her. A second soldier also allegedly took part in the rape.

Soldiers are quoted saying Green and his accomplices then set the family’s home on fire, threw an AK-47 rifle used in the killings into a canal and burned their own bloodstained clothing. They then re-donned their uniforms and assumed their posts at the checkpoint.

Abu Firas Janabi, a cousin of the rape victim’s mother, has been interviewed by a US investigator and also recently spoke to the Los Angeles Times about the atrocity.

He and his wife were the first to arrive on the scene to find the bodies of his relatives. The small farmhouse was still ablaze and he had to douse some of the flames before they could enter the dwelling.

He said he entered the charred house to find the corpse of his cousin’s husband, Kasim Hamza Rasheed, “in the corner of the room, and his head was smashed into pieces.” He could see that his cousin Fakhriya’s arms had been broken. The body of their five-year-old daughter, Hadel, lay beside her father.

He found the body of the young rape victim, Abeer, in another room, naked and burned, with her head smashed in “by a concrete block or a piece of iron,” he told the Times. “There were burns from the bottom of her stomach to the end of her body, except for her feet,” he said.

“I did not believe what I was seeing. I tried to fool myself into believing I was in a dream. But the problem was that we were not dreaming. We put a piece of cloth over her body. Then I left the house together with my wife.”

Janabi said that Abeer’s parents had told him they believed the “girl was a target” of the Americans. He told the Times that three days before the killings, the Rasheed family had been at his house and the girl’s mother had complained that the US soldiers from the nearby checkpoint were constantly searching the family’s house. Her worst fears came to fruition only days later.

Following the incident, Green served for another two months with the 101st Airborne Division. According to military officials and court documents, he received an early discharge because of an “anti-social personality disorder,” and left the army in mid-May.

Military officials have not been forthcoming as to precisely how Green’s “anti-social” behavior manifested itself, but in light of the revelations of the Mahmoudiya incident it seems likely that his participation in the atrocity was known at some level of the military command, and that his honorable discharge was an attempt to cover it up.

The rape and murders in Mahmoudiya are among five criminal cases currently being investigated in Iraq, including an incident last November in Haditha in which 24 civilians, including 15 woman and children, were killed. These increasingly frequent exposures of wanton brutality on the part of US troops have become an embarrassment for the US regime in Baghdad, which has no jurisdiction to try US forces for criminal acts.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has called for an independent inquiry into the rape and murders in Mahmoudiya and a review of a regulation that precludes US forces from facing prosecution in Iraqi courts. His American masters, however, have no intention of doing away with the immunity US forces currently enjoy.

The ban on Iraqi courts trying US soldiers was imposed by the US-led Coalition Provisional Authority that governed Iraq after the 2003 invasion, and retained, at the insistence of Washington, in the constitutional and political setup that has since been orchestrated by the US.

The fact that Iraqi courts have no power to try American soldiers who commit crimes and carry out atrocities against Iraqi civilians thoroughly exposes the fraud of Iraqi “sovereignty” under US military occupation.

Copyright 1998-2006
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved

Kate Randall
- Homepage: http://wsws.org/articles/2006/jul2006/iraq-j10.shtml

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Learn what TOTAL IMMUNITY means

10.07.2006 23:40

Understand that while the US military can try its members in military 'courts' for breaches of military 'discipline', there is otherwise TOTAL IMMUNITY for any foreign individual carrying out Blair's will in Iraq. The immunity is now granted at UN level (earlier it came from Goldsmith and Bush).

An individual can be arrested. An individual can even have a trial. However, the end result of any CIVIL trial will be NO CONVICTION.

THE CIRCUS OF THE TRIAL WILL BE SOLD TO SUCKERS AS PROOF OF JUSTICE. However, those who bother to understand anything that Blair has achieved will understand that the complete and total immunity against prosecution GUARANTEES zero punishment for those outside the military structure (and minimal punishment for those within).

Steven D. Green faces no penalty whatsoever, having been legally dismissed from the US army. His trial is a sham, unless there is found a way to punish him under US military codes (which there won't be). His lawyers have already advised him that the show-trial is for political reasons, and that the principle of immunity protects him against ANY ultimate judgement.

TOTAL IMMUNITY MEANS EXACTLY WHAT IT SAYS ON THE TIN. Such immunity cannot then be set aside by the US government in individual cases.

Had Steven D. Green merely been working as one of Blair's mercenaries in Iraq, he wouldn't even be facing a sham trial.

The quislings that form the phoney 'government' of Iraq all had to agree to the TOTAL IMMUNITY concept before being sworn in. That's right, folks, while Israel claims the right to genocide the whole of the Palestinian people in revenge for one of their terrorists being detained, the 'government' of Iraq formally invite people from all over the globe to come to their nation, free to rape, torture and murder without penalty if they work for Blair.

It is a universal test for evil- seek out those like The Guardian and the BBC, that tell you to believe completely opposite ideas, depending on circumstance. So The Guardian and the BBC tell you that the government of Israel has the right to murder unlimited numbers of Palestinian Humans in revenge for one of its own. The same Guardian and BBC tell you that the Iraq government is LEGITIMATE because it invites foreign forces into Iraq to murder Iraq citizens under a rule of TOTAL IMMUNITY.

Of course, in the time of slavery, the same BBC and Guardian would have told you that rape, torture, and murder of white people was an outrage, but the rape, torture and murder of 'black' slaves was god's will.

There is a greater point. No nation engaging in aggressive war can permit concepts of morality and justice to apply to the forces engaged in atrocity. When Hitler sent his hoardes to exterminate the 'slavs' he certainly wasn't going to let a little thing like justice get in the way.

So why does this case even get the coverage it does? Well, that's because we, the people, still pretend that ***we*** are nice, and that ***we*** have a right to be outraged at such stories. Our passive support empowers Blair, and he must protect this. Ironically, if Blair yet had the arbitary power he craves, the offenders against public opinion would simply be put to death, unprotected by any principle of 'law' including total immunity (and no, I'm not forgetting this 'trial' is in the States). At this moment, Blair, and his US allies, control their respective courts and the mechanisms of law-making, but the courts still have to follow the written word of the law.

Dictators, of course, accumulate power by expressing to their public 'outrage' at the inability of the courts to deliver the 'justice' that the public thinks it deserves. For Blair, times like these are WIN WIN. If the public explodes with outrage when the rapist/murderer is aquitted, Blair (and Bush) demand the power to arbitarily overturn any ruling of any court. If the public shrugs, or is grateful at aquittal, the public support for atrocities commited in the name of Blair has grown significantly, strengthening the option of aggressive abuse of military power.

WHO WOULD BE DEPRAVED ENOUGH TO GRANT TOTAL IMMUNITY TO ANY INVADING ARMY. The answer will shock you. The UN pretty much just exists for this one purpose. Rape is wrong? Not according to the UN. Torture is wrong? Not according to the UN. Murder is wrong? not according to the UN. Total immunity is a concept plucked from the deepest levels of hell. It is the cornerstone of all official UN military activities. The excuse used by the UN is that individual armies can implement systems of military 'justice' (a misnomer, since 'discipline' is the correct term). This automatically puts the military ABOVE all concepts of moral justice, as laid down by civilian populations.

Ordinary justice is designed to make more significant crimes too 'expensive' for the individual, to the point where the number of people willing to risk the 'expense' of punishment falls to suitably low levels.

Armies of aggression are designed to continuously and massively carry out acts of murder and destruction. These acts, ordinarily being the worst crimes that a person can carry out, thus render irrelevant all lesser crimes by said armies, including rape, torture, theft etc. The owner of the aggressive army cares only about its efficiency, and thus only acts to reduce any act that endangers such efficiency.

An army designed for mass rape can see its members hung for minor looting, when such looting occurs against the direct orders of its master. Justice? Don't make me laugh. Discipline and efficiency? Absolutely.

Steven D. Green faces at worst being suicided if he becomes too embarrassing, otherwise he just has to pretend that his trial represents a real threat, so that Blair's press can endlessly push the pretence over the next year or so. Meanwhile, Blair fully expects to greenlight the Iran war that will make all these minor issues vanish.

Oh, and as for Green's rape/murder soldier friends with the misfortune of still being in the army, here is the old 'mafia' trick. Blame is loaded on the person with nothing to lose, in this case Green. Green will eventually walk free under TOTAL IMMUNITY. Meantime, his colleagues, washed cleaner by pushing their sins onto Green, get the smallest penalty possible.

And the problem of similar cases in Iraq? Well, that's always being improved, by ensuring witnesses learn that their big mouths will almost always earn then a trip to one of Blair's torture facilities to meet Mr. power drill. Media organisations learn to give better co-operation to Blair's ground forces, so that they don't make the mistake of noticing such events. With the media and witnesses taken care of, Blair knows that he has done everything to reduce the likelyhood of the knowledge of such events reaching public attention in the future.

twilight


Twilight- stop being thick!

11.07.2006 05:40

Jordan isn't it? Well actaully the immunity means 'immunity from prosecution' by Iraqis not immunity from Conviction in a US court as you claim " An individual can be arrested. An individual can even have a trial. However, the end result of any CIVIL trial will be NO CONVICTION." I know you don't understand law or indeed anything else it seems. If these guys are convicted in a court and face the death penalty that will have the supprt of most in the forces. 2 US soldiers have already been tortured and murdered by the Iraqis solving the matter their way. Now adjust your Burkha love and I hope you have your husbands permission to use the PC wouldn't want u to get accussed of adultery now and stoned to death would we?

Arthur


Abusing Twilight's responses achieves nothing

11.07.2006 14:29

Interesting how the most vehement rebuttals of Twilight's comments come from people whose own grasp of the issues is lacking. Whether we agree with everything Twilight says, s/he does provide a credible alternative slant on received wisdom.

T, keep it up. T-haters, at least make an effort to offer a coherent response. Shouting "u ficko!" and chucking exclamation marks around does not count as debate.

Education education education


And...

11.07.2006 23:05

being a prejudiced little shit doesn’t help a great deal either

Haidar


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech