Peter Tatchell on the Darfur crisis
pirate | 16.09.2006 11:05 | Anti-racism | Repression | Social Struggles | London | World
Peter Tatchell calls for the overthrow of the Islaimist dictatorship in Sudan as the only way for that country and Darfur to achive lasting peace with UN help.
Darfur – Arab racism & Islamist oppression
UN peacekeepers are needed urgently, but the key to lasting peace in
Darfur is the overthrow of the Islamist dictatorship
By Peter Tatchell
This is an edited version of Peter Tatchell’s Comment Is Free article,
published on The Guardian website, Friday 15 September 2006
After the horrors of Rwanda, Tony Blair and other world leaders
promised they would never again allow genocide to happen. Despite
these fine words, another genocide is happening right now in Darfur
and the international community is failing to protect the victims.
If these massacres were happening to white people in Surrey or Sweden,
you can be sure there would be swift intervention to halt the killing.
One cannot help wonder whether the global indifference to the
slaughter in Darfur has anything to do with the fact that the victims
are black and live in far away Africa. We would not tolerate this
killing on our doorstep. Why are we tolerating it in Darfur?
Over the last three years, the death rate in Darfur has been, on
average, the equivalent of a 9/11 every week. The world has sat back
and watched as around 400,000 people have died and two million others
have been displaced. Over three million Darfurians are living a knife
edge existence, with many dependent on international aid for their
survival.
How many more have to die before we do something effective to stop the
slaughter?
Calling for international action to save lives in Darfur isn’t
neo-imperialism, as some on the left allege. It is international
solidarity and justice – the liberation of the oppressed. Doing
nothing, which is what sections of left would prefer, is collision
with the oppressors. Some people might also see it as racist for the
supposedly ‘anti-imperialist left’ to leave black Africans to die in
their hundreds of thousands.
The UN, as the guardian of universally-agreed international human
rights laws, has a moral and legal duty to take immediate and
effective action to stop the massacres. Support for a UN peacekeeping
force is a key demand of many of those participating in Sunday’s
Global Day for Darfur, which includes a London protest outside the
Sudanese Embassy, followed by a march to Downing Street
http://www.dayfordarfur.org/Events/London_UK.htm
Despite the Darfur Peace Agreement, signed in May, the violence has
not ceased. The Islamist government of Sudan and its Janjaweed proxies
last month launched fresh offensives in defiance of the peace
agreement. They continue their rampage of rape, torture, mutilation
and slaughter against black Darfurians; razing villages, burning crops
and killing cattle – provoking mass displacement, homelessness,
starvation and death (albeit on a lesser scale than two years ago).
Darfur is a needless, preventable humanitarian tragedy, aided by the
complacency and inaction of the international community - especially
the shameful nit-picking and delays by the United Nations.
Last year’s UN report on Darfur was all words and no action. Its
condemnation of the mass killing, torture and rape did not go far
enough. The UN could not even agree on whether the slaughter in Darfur
was genocide. While tens of thousands were dying, the UN quibbled over
words and definitions. It even fudged the issue of whether the human
rights abusers in Sudan should face prosecution by the International
Criminal Court; suggesting only that this might be a possibility at
some point in the future.
The UN’s report was a cruel betrayal of black Africans suffering
slaughter by Arab supremacists. Whatever way you look at it, the
killings have an element of racial motivation and the UN’s failure to
long ago condemn them as genocide and ethnic cleansing was, in effect,
appeasement of the Sudanese government and the Janjaweed militia.
According to the 1948 Genocide Convention and the 1949 Geneva
Conventions, the nations of the world are supposed to act when
genocide and war crimes happen. The do-little response of recent years
is de facto complicity.
The massacres in Darfur are, of course, inseparable from the systemic
totalitarianism and human rights abuses of the Khartoum regime against
all Sudanese. The government of Sudan is an Arab-dominated
dictatorship led by Islamist fundamentalists, notably the President,
Field Marshal Omar al-Bashir. He seized power in a military coup in
1989; banning political parties, suppressing the press and dissolving
parliament. Al-Bashir now enforces a harsh form of Shariah law, which
stipulates the death penalty for a wide range of so-called moral
crimes, like adultery and homosexuality. Detention without trial,
torture and executions are facts of life in Sudan, according to local
human rights monitors http://www.soatsudan.org/
Sudan hosted Osama bin Laden and terrorist training camps in the
1990s, albeit for only few years before kicking them out under western
pressure. The al-Bashir regime has a long history of brutally
suppressing socialists, trade unionists, womens’ rights activists,
lawyers, journalists and student leaders.
Viewed from these perspectives, the terror in Darfur is merely a
particularly savage extension of the brutality that is endemic to the
dictatorship in Khartoum.
Although the existing African Union (AU) peace-keeping force in Darfur
is well-intended and better than nothing, it is seriously undermanned,
underfunded and outgunned. It is not big enough to protect the
civilian population in a region the size of France, and it does not
have sufficient powers, vehicles and weapons to keep the peace.
At long last, recognising these limitations, the UN Security Council
passed Resolution 1706 at the end of August. This authorises the
sending into Darfur of an additional, stronger, better equipped UN
peacekeeping force, to augment the existing AU troops. Welcoming this
decision, the AU asked the government of Sudan to facilitate the
implacement of UN peacekeepers.
The Sudanese leaders responded by rejecting the AU’s request, refusing
to accept UN peacekeepers, launching fresh attacks on the people of
Darfur and obstructing the delivery of international aid.
Some aid workers have been killed and others have been forced to flee
the fighting, leaving tens of thousands of refugees short of vital
food and medical supplies. If the violence continues, there is a real
danger that many aid agencies will pull out of Darfur; which could
provoke a humanitarian catastrophe.
The Darfur crisis is a litmus test of the global community’s
commitment to enforce international law and challenge murderous,
tyrannical regimes. Right now, world leaders have failed that test.
They are sitting back and allowing the killing to continue. Tyrants
can see that they can get away with mass murder. At this rate, there
will be many more Rwandas and Darfurs in the future. The feeble action
against the killers of Darfur gives dictators everywhere comfort and
encouragement that they can commit genocide with impunity.
One question many Darfurians are asking: If Slobodan Milosevic could
be arrested and put on trial in The Hague, why can’t the butchers of
Khartoum be bought to justice?
Despite the failings of the past, it is not too late. The
international community, through the UN, should act now to take
effective action to protect the people of Darfur:
- Enforce a no-fly zone over Darfur to halt the Sudanese bombing of
African villages
- Fund the enlargement of the African Union peace-keeping force and
augment it with UN peace-keepers, in order to protect the civilian
population and aid workers, keep the warring factions apart, disarm
the militias and protect the civilian population
- Increase humanitarian aid - food, clothing, shelter and medical care
- to the victims of the conflict, and assist the rebuilding of
shattered communities
- Impose sanctions targeted against the Sudanese government leaders
and the
leaders of the Janjaweed militia, including an arms embargo, an
assets freeze and arraignment before the International Criminal Court
on charges of war crimes, genocide, torture and crimes against
humanity.
Ultimately, the best hope for Darfur - and for all the people of Sudan
- is ending the Islamist dictatorship in Khartoum. Without a
government committed to democracy and human rights, there can be no
ethnic equality and social justice. All Sudanese - Arabs and Africans,
northerners and southerners - have a common interest in working
together to secure the overthrow of the tyrannical al-Bashir regime
and to create a democratic, secular and federal Sudan.
ENDS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UN peacekeepers are needed urgently, but the key to lasting peace in
Darfur is the overthrow of the Islamist dictatorship
By Peter Tatchell
This is an edited version of Peter Tatchell’s Comment Is Free article,
published on The Guardian website, Friday 15 September 2006
After the horrors of Rwanda, Tony Blair and other world leaders
promised they would never again allow genocide to happen. Despite
these fine words, another genocide is happening right now in Darfur
and the international community is failing to protect the victims.
If these massacres were happening to white people in Surrey or Sweden,
you can be sure there would be swift intervention to halt the killing.
One cannot help wonder whether the global indifference to the
slaughter in Darfur has anything to do with the fact that the victims
are black and live in far away Africa. We would not tolerate this
killing on our doorstep. Why are we tolerating it in Darfur?
Over the last three years, the death rate in Darfur has been, on
average, the equivalent of a 9/11 every week. The world has sat back
and watched as around 400,000 people have died and two million others
have been displaced. Over three million Darfurians are living a knife
edge existence, with many dependent on international aid for their
survival.
How many more have to die before we do something effective to stop the
slaughter?
Calling for international action to save lives in Darfur isn’t
neo-imperialism, as some on the left allege. It is international
solidarity and justice – the liberation of the oppressed. Doing
nothing, which is what sections of left would prefer, is collision
with the oppressors. Some people might also see it as racist for the
supposedly ‘anti-imperialist left’ to leave black Africans to die in
their hundreds of thousands.
The UN, as the guardian of universally-agreed international human
rights laws, has a moral and legal duty to take immediate and
effective action to stop the massacres. Support for a UN peacekeeping
force is a key demand of many of those participating in Sunday’s
Global Day for Darfur, which includes a London protest outside the
Sudanese Embassy, followed by a march to Downing Street
http://www.dayfordarfur.org/Events/London_UK.htm Despite the Darfur Peace Agreement, signed in May, the violence has
not ceased. The Islamist government of Sudan and its Janjaweed proxies
last month launched fresh offensives in defiance of the peace
agreement. They continue their rampage of rape, torture, mutilation
and slaughter against black Darfurians; razing villages, burning crops
and killing cattle – provoking mass displacement, homelessness,
starvation and death (albeit on a lesser scale than two years ago).
Darfur is a needless, preventable humanitarian tragedy, aided by the
complacency and inaction of the international community - especially
the shameful nit-picking and delays by the United Nations.
Last year’s UN report on Darfur was all words and no action. Its
condemnation of the mass killing, torture and rape did not go far
enough. The UN could not even agree on whether the slaughter in Darfur
was genocide. While tens of thousands were dying, the UN quibbled over
words and definitions. It even fudged the issue of whether the human
rights abusers in Sudan should face prosecution by the International
Criminal Court; suggesting only that this might be a possibility at
some point in the future.
The UN’s report was a cruel betrayal of black Africans suffering
slaughter by Arab supremacists. Whatever way you look at it, the
killings have an element of racial motivation and the UN’s failure to
long ago condemn them as genocide and ethnic cleansing was, in effect,
appeasement of the Sudanese government and the Janjaweed militia.
According to the 1948 Genocide Convention and the 1949 Geneva
Conventions, the nations of the world are supposed to act when
genocide and war crimes happen. The do-little response of recent years
is de facto complicity.
The massacres in Darfur are, of course, inseparable from the systemic
totalitarianism and human rights abuses of the Khartoum regime against
all Sudanese. The government of Sudan is an Arab-dominated
dictatorship led by Islamist fundamentalists, notably the President,
Field Marshal Omar al-Bashir. He seized power in a military coup in
1989; banning political parties, suppressing the press and dissolving
parliament. Al-Bashir now enforces a harsh form of Shariah law, which
stipulates the death penalty for a wide range of so-called moral
crimes, like adultery and homosexuality. Detention without trial,
torture and executions are facts of life in Sudan, according to local
human rights monitors
http://www.soatsudan.org/ Sudan hosted Osama bin Laden and terrorist training camps in the
1990s, albeit for only few years before kicking them out under western
pressure. The al-Bashir regime has a long history of brutally
suppressing socialists, trade unionists, womens’ rights activists,
lawyers, journalists and student leaders.
Viewed from these perspectives, the terror in Darfur is merely a
particularly savage extension of the brutality that is endemic to the
dictatorship in Khartoum.
Although the existing African Union (AU) peace-keeping force in Darfur
is well-intended and better than nothing, it is seriously undermanned,
underfunded and outgunned. It is not big enough to protect the
civilian population in a region the size of France, and it does not
have sufficient powers, vehicles and weapons to keep the peace.
At long last, recognising these limitations, the UN Security Council
passed Resolution 1706 at the end of August. This authorises the
sending into Darfur of an additional, stronger, better equipped UN
peacekeeping force, to augment the existing AU troops. Welcoming this
decision, the AU asked the government of Sudan to facilitate the
implacement of UN peacekeepers.
The Sudanese leaders responded by rejecting the AU’s request, refusing
to accept UN peacekeepers, launching fresh attacks on the people of
Darfur and obstructing the delivery of international aid.
Some aid workers have been killed and others have been forced to flee
the fighting, leaving tens of thousands of refugees short of vital
food and medical supplies. If the violence continues, there is a real
danger that many aid agencies will pull out of Darfur; which could
provoke a humanitarian catastrophe.
The Darfur crisis is a litmus test of the global community’s
commitment to enforce international law and challenge murderous,
tyrannical regimes. Right now, world leaders have failed that test.
They are sitting back and allowing the killing to continue. Tyrants
can see that they can get away with mass murder. At this rate, there
will be many more Rwandas and Darfurs in the future. The feeble action
against the killers of Darfur gives dictators everywhere comfort and
encouragement that they can commit genocide with impunity.
One question many Darfurians are asking: If Slobodan Milosevic could
be arrested and put on trial in The Hague, why can’t the butchers of
Khartoum be bought to justice?
Despite the failings of the past, it is not too late. The
international community, through the UN, should act now to take
effective action to protect the people of Darfur:
- Enforce a no-fly zone over Darfur to halt the Sudanese bombing of
African villages
- Fund the enlargement of the African Union peace-keeping force and
augment it with UN peace-keepers, in order to protect the civilian
population and aid workers, keep the warring factions apart, disarm
the militias and protect the civilian population
- Increase humanitarian aid - food, clothing, shelter and medical care
- to the victims of the conflict, and assist the rebuilding of
shattered communities
- Impose sanctions targeted against the Sudanese government leaders
and the
leaders of the Janjaweed militia, including an arms embargo, an
assets freeze and arraignment before the International Criminal Court
on charges of war crimes, genocide, torture and crimes against
humanity.
Ultimately, the best hope for Darfur - and for all the people of Sudan
- is ending the Islamist dictatorship in Khartoum. Without a
government committed to democracy and human rights, there can be no
ethnic equality and social justice. All Sudanese - Arabs and Africans,
northerners and southerners - have a common interest in working
together to secure the overthrow of the tyrannical al-Bashir regime
and to create a democratic, secular and federal Sudan.
ENDS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pirate
