Court Reporting
zorro | 15.01.2007 20:25
zorro
A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.
zorro | 15.01.2007 20:25
zorro
www.indymedia.org
Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Africa
Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela
Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney
South Asia
india
United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester
West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
?
15.01.2007 21:37
I doubt that the transcript has come from the court officials or even represents a final and official document.
The jurors will be isolated from the media reports.
Or did I miss something here?
Puta
the point
15.01.2007 22:32
sardonicus
regardless
15.01.2007 23:49
zorro
Addition
16.01.2007 15:16
This article is utter nonsense.
Man in the Pub
On the other hand...
16.01.2007 18:36
It seems a good idea putting the full transcripts on the internet to me.
It's not prejudicial as what is being said in the case is being heard by the jury, so it is not going to warp the outcome (like biased coverage before the trial can). It's not information that is top secret and private as court cases are public - you can go along with a notepad yourself, if you like, and if you can turn up early enough to get a seat. Newspapers can't print the whole things because of lack of space / readers' finite interest, but the transcripts are good material for the internet.
And I don't know what you're on about when it comes to the appeal. As far as I was aware, appeals were heard by judges - not by juries. The judges are also given all the details of the original cases, so it can then be pointed out why the conviction was wrong. It's not going to affect them either. But let me know if I've got my crown court details on that confused.
In any case, Sky's decision is not really a nail in the coffin of the legal system, is it? If anything, it's a happy day for internet freedom and transparency of the legal system. Justice must be done and it must be seen to be done.
(Incidentally, I'm willing to bet that it's only a matter of days before the conspiraloons start copying and pasting lines off Sky from the defence speeches to *prove* that the bombings were a false flag operation plotted by MI5, the Illuminati, the Masons, the CIA, Mossad, the Royal family and the lizard people...)
Anyway, thanks for the heads up - have never visited the Sky website before but will now look at it more regularly...
Norville B