Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

What is a Terrorist Trying to Achieve? What can be Done About Terrorism?

Stefanos Loucopoulos | 12.04.2007 10:14 | Analysis | Globalisation | Terror War | World

Can terrorism be fought with terror? Do the leading governments of the current world order really understand the phenomenon of terrorism?
This article attempts to shed some light on the functional purpose of a terrorist act whilst at the same time provide an alternative approach to the solution of this problem.

The tragic events of 9/11 at the heartland of the current world system of economics politics and values came as a shock to a dormant global society. Political analysts, academics and prominent political figures along side with a rather naïve and ill informed international society were suddenly shaken, rather than awakened, by the explosions and subsequent collapse of the Twin Towers in Manhattan. An event that was undoubtedly without precedent, and was only imaginable to a very little and marginalized fraction of warmongers and hawks residing mainly in the United States, was to scar the beginning of the 21st century. Soon after, an almost historical cloud of deja vu reminiscent of medieval times seemed to cover the new millennium and the minds of the most powerful and influential world leaders. Manichaeism and notions of good and evil, us versus them, the axis of evil that came out of nowhere to challenge an almost idealistic world of prosperity and progress, became the leading rhetorical trends. Since then, the bombings in Spain and the London underground have further aggravated the witch hunt, proving that unfortunately, economic and technological progress does not always presuppose intellectual progress. The crusade against “wind mills” is ongoing, against an enemy without a face, an enemy that is just there but really that they know so little about. The terrorist attacks in New York, Madrid and London created panic and distress and unfortunately disabled Western leaders from asking themselves some crucial questions about the rising phenomenon of international terrorism. There was no pause to ponder upon the purpose of such terrible acts and no real effort to examine the “why” behind international terrorism. Only ill based assumptions funded on a rationale of inherent superiority stemming from the glorification and exceptionalism of Western values and a Gesellschaft-like society. It is time now for real questions to be answered, questions that if approached in a self-critical manner might help deal with terrorism more effectively and from the root.
The purpose of this article is to address such issues and in particular focus on the question of what a terrorist is trying to achieve. Analysing the aforementioned question, and thus determining what fuels terrorism may serve to interpret the hidden message behind these terrible acts. In fact, this paper will contend that what a terrorist is trying to achieve, amongst other things, is to publicise to a wider audience a message of grievance, alienation and injustice through symbolic actions. Terrorism is an endemic phenomenon of the modern globalised system and therefore it should be treated as such and not regarded as an alien force trying to end the world as we know it. Hence, instead of planning new military operations we should listen to the real message of terrorism and tackle the problem from there.

What is a terrorist trying to achieve?

As a whole, the phenomenon of terrorism that is currently posing a challenge to the international status quo can be regarded as a bi-product of the globalised political, cultural and economic system that defines the international system today. Terrorism in other words, is a reactionary movement to the aforementioned phenomenon by those who feel that have been marginalized and treated unfairly. It can be viewed as a response to an almost omnipresent structural violence that is being exercised upon certain areas of the world by the leading actors of the international arena and the globalised system itself. A reaction to an aggressive and expanding Gesellschaft-like international society that if not embraced will unavoidably lead to alienation, marginalisation and whatever follows from this. Moreover, it has been argued that given the fact that globalisation involves the integration into a web of economic transactions; local authority and the sense of place are being threatened. Thus, a terrorist and terrorism as a whole, aims at making their grievances heard through symbolic acts since they lack the capacities of defending themselves otherwise from the global forces of cultural and economic change. It follows from this, that a terrorist’s aim cannot be regarded as serving a purely functional role in the short run, but rather, a symbolic one. In particular, a terrorist or a terrorist act is primarily concentrated in advertising, provoking, dissuading, disorientating and to an extent to recruit new blood within their network. With regards to the latter, it is evident how the attacks on the Twin Towers, a Western and in particular American iconic landmark, has galvanized a wide spectrum of Islamist groups and led to the formation of several new ones.

Thus, it could be safely argued that terrorist violence aims at communicating a political message and hence the ends go beyond inflicting damage on material resources; rather, the aim is to attract the attention of a larger human audience and publicise a given cause. With regards to provoking, the terrorist is seeking a counter reaction from the target in an effort to lead the given state to demonstrate its more aggressive and repressive face, this in turn will not only galvanize further the networks of terrorism, but at the same time will create mild sympathisers on the opposite “camps”. To be more precise here are some examples; since the military counter terrorist interventions of the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq, there has been a wave of protests originating from the West condemning the uncontrolled use of violence inflicted upon the targets and mere civilians. The establishment of terrorist detention centres in Abou Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay, and the appalling human rights abuses that take place within them has also led to the condemnation of these practices by the international community and civil society. Moreover, the recent allegations of secret detention centres used by the CIA within EU territory has exacerbated transatlantic relations.

A terrorist therefore, through an act of violence is merely attempting to communicate a message to both the people he represents and the “other side”. The message is political in nature and its delivery symbolic. It serves the need of publicising a given cause, raising awareness and provoking a reaction that may lead gradually to a much-needed change. Unfortunately the Western powers have so far been unable to read between the lines of a terrorist act and until then the crusade against “windmills” is bound to persist.


What can be done about terrorism?


Bearing in mind the reasons behind the rise of terrorism, and most importantly considering the purpose of their acts as defined in the previous section, one can only conclude that the solution to the problem cannot be found within the current policies employed by the major powers, which merely scrape the surface of the problem and to an extent serve only to further exacerbate it. The current approach to the problem of terrorism is therefore fundamentally flawed; it may lead to the annihilation of particular groups in the short run through the use of heavy military force, but the phenomenon of terrorism will remain untouched and feed itself from the acts of violence inflicted by the West. Terrorism in other words, is not a unitary or material entity, rather it is an idea, a movement of protest, and it has to be dealt with as such.

Going back to the current approach of tackling terrorism that is followed by the Western powers and in particular the United States, one could argue that its flaws are twofold. Firstly, although the use of military power may indeed reduce the immediate threat, it also leads to the compartmentalisation of the terrorist cells making them harder to detect and thus giving them more time and incentives to plan the next attack. On the other hand, such strategy may also lead to self-inflicted negative effects for the Western world. In particular, in an effort to increase security Western governments have already taken actions that affect negatively the civil liberties and values of its own citizens. Western states are gradually transforming themselves into societies of control, where the individual’s privacy is under constant threat. To make the case, according to a study, London has 200,000 CCTV cameras, and more than 4 million cameras have been deployed throughout the country. Moreover, it is estimated that there is one camera for every 14 people. The average Briton is seen by 300 cameras per day according to estimates. From the above, we can safely deduct that the current aggressive and repressive strategy employed against the phenomenon of terrorism is not only inefficient but also hazardous. A new strategy needs to be employed, one that requires insight and self-criticism on the side of the Western world, in other words one that tackles the problem from its roots.

A starting point would be the toning down of structural violence that characterizes the international system today. In fact, terrorism can be considered as a reaction to this phenomenon by people that are being deprived of the possibility to act as others do. The current economic globalization with its foundations on the logic of pure capitalism does not favor social justice, in other words it causes inequality among states leaving a considerable segment of the population of the world dissatisfied. What is suggested here is not the dismantling of this system, in fact this would classify this proposition as a mere utopia, but its gradual “democratization” and reconsideration of the economic realities of the global South. This would involve the formation of institutional structures with a more balanced outlook, that reflect both human values and needs alongside those of the global market. Moreover, rather than alienating or merely dictating, institutional structures should focus on the enhancement of participation and solidarity, thus becoming more legitimate and fair. By shifting towards a more democratic international system, one that is more inclusive, with its foundations in justice and solidarity; factors such as alienation, the feeling of injustice and even exploitation that harness international terrorism will gradually retreat.

The above could be considered as a long-term strategy since it would take a long time to reform the international system in such a manner. However, one could detect solutions to the problem of terrorism in the short-term as well. As we know, a number of unresolved conflicts around the world, especially those in the Muslim dominated areas, are providing a steady pool of recruits and support for violent Islamists. Hence, the international community, in an effort to fight terrorism, should develop capabilities to facilitate negotiations and aid in the resolution of these conflicts. Amongst these conflicts one could include the Arab-Israeli dispute, Chechnya and Kashmir. In an interview, the European Council’s Counter-Terrorism Coordinator Mr. Gijs de Vries argued on the matter that the lack of progress in the Middle East peace process fuels the phenomenon of terrorism and thus its solution should be a priority of the international community including the United States.


The list of particular policies that could be employed seems to be more than vast; the issue however is for the leading global actors to grasp the essence of terrorism and what it really represents. As long as the refusal to fight the iconic, socioeconomic and political drivers of terrorism, as well as a refusal to change the reality on the ground persists, terrorism will not retreat. The real solution to the problem can only be reached if the few passengers of the fast train of economic and cultural globalization look through its rear window, see who is left behind covered in its dust, and extend their arms to reach for them.

Stefanos Loucopoulos

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech