Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

All Engineers working for arms manufacturers are in breach of code of ethics

Professor M | 19.05.2007 10:20 | Anti-militarism | Technology

All Engineers who make weapons are automatically in breach of professional code of conduct guidelines and should be expelled and have chartered status removed.

According to the IEEE (The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) code of ethics:
 http://www.ieee.org/web/membership/ethics/code_ethics.html

"We, the members of the IEEE, in recognition of the importance of our technologies in affecting the quality of life throughout the world, and in accepting a personal obligation to our profession, its members and the communities we serve, do hereby commit ourselves to the highest ethical and professional conduct and agree:

1. to accept responsibility in making decisions consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the public, and to disclose promptly factors that might endanger the public or the environment."

Therefore all Professional Electrical and Electronic engineers, especially chartered ones, who work for arms manufaturers making weapons are in breach of their professional code of ethics. as the populations of third world countries where the weapons are generally used are still the "public".

These Engineers are therefore liable for expulsion from professional membership and lose chartered status.

Professor M

Comments

Hide the following 8 comments

Bizarre interpretation of the words

19.05.2007 11:44

" 1. to accept responsibility in making decisions consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the public, and to disclose promptly factors that might endanger the public or the environment."

Therefore all Professional Electrical and Electronic engineers, especially chartered ones, who work for arms manufaturers making weapons are in breach of their professional code of ethics. as the populations of third world countries where the weapons are generally used are still the "public".

These Engineers are therefore liable for expulsion from professional membership and lose chartered status."

Professor M, are you under the impression that there are engineers out there who claim that the weapons upon which they work are harmless? Unable to endanger "the public"? USELESS as weapons? (when in fact they ARE useful weapons)

Now THAT would be a violation of the ethics statement.

Or are you under the impression (possible, but you need to show evidence) that there are engineers out there who are making weapons but denying the responsibility for doing so -- "hey man, not me, I didn't work on that weapon".

Sorry "Prof", but you fail in logic. Words of a pledge mean what the words do and as intepreted by the people speaking them. NOT as according to how somebody else might feel the words SHOULD mean.

Mike Novack
mail e-mail: stepbystpefarm mtdata.com


Engineers and Ethics

19.05.2007 15:36

"Professor M, are you under the impression that there are engineers out there who claim that the weapons upon which they work are harmless? Unable to endanger "the public"? USELESS as weapons? (when in fact they ARE useful weapons)
Now THAT would be a violation of the ethics statement. "

You are completely missing the point - the fact that their work is used to kill and injure is unethical in itself. According to the ethics statement any work that endangers the public is unethical. Therefore they are in violation of it!

Or are you under the impression (possible, but you need to show evidence) that there are engineers out there who are making weapons but denying the responsibility for doing so -- "hey man, not me, I didn't work on that weapon".

It is irellevant wether they deny responsibility or not, the fact that they chose to work on weapons which kill people shows them to be unethical and unworthy of being chartered.

"Sorry "Prof", but you fail in logic. Words of a pledge mean what the words do and as intepreted by the people speaking them. NOT as according to how somebody else might feel the words SHOULD mean."

I am afraid that an ethics statement is not open to interpretation by the person saying it, otherwise it would be absolutely worthless - If a pledge it to mean anything it must have a legal meaning enterpreted by the law.

It would be interesting to see some test cases brought before the courts to get Engineers working in this industry to evaluate their morals and ethics.

Robert Fisk recently brought shards of a bomb that he saw hit an ambulance in lebanon back to the factory where it was made in the US. People have to accept responsiblity for their choice of work and their Ethics/Morals or lack thereof.

Professor M


WHOA THERE!

19.05.2007 22:17

Prof M -- you were referring to THEIR statement of ethics and claiming that they were in violation of THAT.

Now you propose to switch to your own definitions of ethical conduct. It is beside the point whether yours is a better definition than theirs. It isn't theirs, so they are not in violation of THEIR statement of ethics just because they might be in violation of yours.

PROFESSIONAL ethics have little to nothing to do with general personal ethics.

What do you imagine "ethics" are?

For example -- in light of the way you seem to wish to apply ethics, are you denying the possibility of professional ethics for "the profession of arms"?

Mike Novack
mail e-mail: stepbystpefarm mtdata.com


Illogical Argument

20.05.2007 10:06

"Prof M -- you were referring to THEIR statement of ethics and claiming that they were in violation of THAT.

Now you propose to switch to your own definitions of ethical conduct. It is beside the point whether yours is a better definition than theirs. It isn't theirs, so they are not in violation of THEIR statement of ethics just because they might be in violation of yours."

No, I said that they are in violation of the Engineer's code of ethics, it is not in dispute that bombs e.t.c. harm the public, this is not my definition, it is a universial truism.

"PROFESSIONAL ethics have little to nothing to do with general personal ethics."

An astonishing statement - professional ethics have everything to do with personal ethics and morals, they are intertwined, otherwise there would be no whitleblowers and everyone would simply - "go with the flow".

"What do you imagine "ethics" are?"

Professional Ethics are moral guidelines and a code of conduct for the profession.

"For example -- in light of the way you seem to wish to apply ethics, are you denying the possibility of professional ethics for "the profession of arms"?"

I am not applying "ethics" the IEEE is.
There may be profesional ethics for arms manufacturers just as there may be honour amoung thieves or mass murderers. The mafia have some code of conduct as they carry out their crimes.
However most of the engineers chartered or otherwise with the IEEE have to agree to their code of ethics if they wish to become members, the small minority who make weapons have violated the ethical code of Engineers.

Your arguments are tenuous and confused, playing the devils advocate in a clear cut case.
looking at your posts here and other posts you have made there is a common thread of defending the indefensible, i.e. murderers, arms dealers, IOF e.t.c.

Professor M


We

20.05.2007 13:41

Kill you with compassion.

Bhuddist Enginners


You have trouble with reading comprehension?

20.05.2007 15:22

Prof M, if you interpret the sort of stuff I tend to write as "defending" any of a number of things from ill conceived attack you are totally missing the point.

I am saying "rethink, rework your attack".

If I were really as much on "the other side" as you seem to suppose I would let the sort of illogical thing you have posted stand unchallenged.

What you should be arguing (if your position is what I think it is) is that the engineers ethical statement inadequate, that they are NOT promising/requiring considerations of all sorts of ethical situations which you think important. Make THAT case. Arguing that they are in violation of THEIR professional ethics statement which is clearly not including these things you think SHOULD be in their statement (because some of them are violating THOSE things) is silly.

Mike Novack
mail e-mail: stepbystpefarm mtdata.com


Get it yet?

20.05.2007 15:25

IF you took what I just said as a "defense" of the engineers (or scientists) NOT including among their professional ethics these "other things" then you simply are reading MUCH more into what I said than is there. You simply do not know what my position is on that matter.

Mike Novack
mail e-mail: stepbysstpefarm mtdata.com


Interesting argument, but...

29.11.2007 11:17

"to accept responsibility in making decisions consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the public, and to disclose promptly factors that might endanger the public or the environment."

---

I do believe then that all the engineer is required to do is to disclose promptly the actual factors that might endanger the public or the environment.

Therefore all they have to do is tell people they make weapons, and what the weapons are, and how they might endanger them. I read enough on New Scientist about fancy new weapon systems to get the impression that they do anyway.

Assuming they don't get arrested under official secrets acts, that's basically all they have to do. It might be an interesting argument in court if they were arrested for that reason though.

Dave


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech