"antagonism toward the USA and Israel"

"structurally anti-Semitic criticism of capitalism"

"Israels withdrawal from the Gaza strip and the subsequent terror offensive of the Palestinians"

"a completely amiss analysis of capitalism in which globalisation - equated with imperialism"

"the Iranian mullah regime which is currently sedously working on the nuclear destruction of Israel"

"Israels allegedly disproportional military policy"

Sounds like pro-Imperial bullshit to me...

It looks like a duck...
It quacks like a duck
It must be a duck

How does the European genocide against the Jews in any way justify the nationalist European Jews driving the local indiginous Palestinian population off their land and refusing all right of return to those expelled, while throwing the borders open to anybody with even a remote claim to be Jewish.

I've got nowt against Arabs. :-)
Thes guys are part of the loony anti-deutcsh(?) movement in Germany.

Andy

No Borders No Nations, and that inclides Isra-hell.

It is nice to see such a clear call for Arab-Jewish unity. It is long over due for the paranoid Zionist monopoly on 'anti-semitism' to be broken.

But with the intractable nature of the problem, perhaps the only thing that will stop the trouble is an overwhelming Anti Semitic force that will eradicate both Jews and Arabs. That solution is now on the cards with Mass extinction.

That is far more likely to come about because God has died through brain tumors induced by all the contradictory prayers the different Religions (and often the same Religions) have been hammering away with.

Perhaps there will be a New God for the next Creation of Life who will see that a New Society comes into existence that knows and avoids the self exterminating practices of Homo Sap. Homo Co-operator ?

"I've got nowt against Arabs. :-)"

anti-semitism doesn´t mean hostility towards semits, its only means hostility towards jews. have a look at the history of antisemitism and you will understand.


a definition found in the net:

"Antisemitism:
This term originated at the end of the 1870s. It was misleading in that hostility was solely directed at Jews and not against all semitic peoples.
Antisemitism i.e. emnity towards Jews, is not restricted to Christian cultures, however, it is within these cultures that it is most evident. Whereas in the West the spread of antisemitism remained relatively restricted, in Germany and in eastern Europe it was widely disseminated.
Following the 1st World War the Jews were made answerable for all social and political crises. The Nazis consciously built upon this conventional antisemitism and additionally used the modern form of antisemitism i.e. racial antisemitism. The attempt by the Nazis to systematically exterminate the "Jews", as defined by the Nuremberg decrees, as contained in their policy of the "Endlösung der Judenfrage"/"Final solution to the Jewish Problem", represented the most extreme form of antisemitism, which however had its origins in the antisemitism of the previous century."

. . . . lobby groups in the states, "pro-israeli" groups amongst others, seem to push the loopholes wider all the time for minderbinder warbux scams, in fact some people wonder if the israelis are perhaps "nailed to the perch" of conflict for the sake of it . . . .

This is simply another smear of the anti-Global Corporatization movement. Note the barely-veiled contempt the authors feel for this movement, and their willingness to misrepresent the antiwar elements amongst the demonstrators, even though this was not a subject of their blockades and protests.

"Within the last couple of years, another consensus has-explicitly and implicitly-been agreed on: An antagonism toward the USA and Israel"

This is not true. Nor is informed criticism of these two allied Neo-Fascist Regimes "antagonistic".

"as well as a structurally anti-Semitic criticism of capitalism."

Another LIE, exposing the intent of the (unidentified) authors of this piece.

"The closing statement of the world social forum of Porto Alegre expressed the forum`s solidarity with the “Palestinian people”

Indeed, as they are an oppressed people who have been abused and ignored for decades. This has little to do with "antiglobalization".

"The European Social Forum in Paris willingly offered a platform to (...) Tariq Ramadan"

You'll have to elaborate and support your allegations. Your dishonesty thus far casts doubt on these statements.

"whilst activists, that criticised the anti-Semitism of the No-Globals in a Flyer, were attacked and expelled from the forum."

That's because they were Zionist Operatives, not "activists", equating criticism and condemnation of Zionist Fascism with "antisemitism", and were there with the sole purpose of disrupting the proceedings.

"At an event during the EU-Summit in Copenhagen the Danish group “Global Roots” demanded a boycott of Israel stewards wore shirts with the slogan “Burn Israel Burn” on them."

That sentence doesn't make sense, but I suggest you support this allegation.

"During an ATTAC meeting in Germany the Italian globalisation critic Alfonso de Vito compared Israels policy toward the Palestinians with the eviction of the Warsaw Ghetto."

And ... ? The comparison is just, right down to the Israelis-only routes the Government has constructed, in order to keep the Israelis from seeing what their Government is doing to the Palestinians in the Territories. The Germans did the same. And Israel's military studied the Germans' handling of the Warsaw Ghetto when determining tactics for the Territories. I don't get your point.

"Noam Chomsky (irrelevant, dishonest passage deleted) authored a manifesto in summer 2006 which declares Israel guilty of the Hisbollahs attack on Israels North because it was aiming to liquidate the Palestinian state."

Indeed, as International Law says this.

The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict
Published by Jews for Justice in the Middle East

As the periodic bloodshed continues in the Middle East, the search for an equitable solution must come to grips with the root cause of the conflict. The conventional wisdom is that, even if both sides are at fault, the Palestinians are irrational "terrorists" who have no point of view worth listening to. Our position, however, is that the Palestinians have a real grievance: their homeland for over a thousand years was taken, without their consent and mostly by force, during creation of the state of Israel. And all subsequent crimes—on both sides—inevitably follow from this original injustice.

 http://www.wrmea.com/jews_for_justice/

"which not only ignores the fact that there is no Palestinian state"

That's kinda his point. And Zionist Extremism aims to ensure there never will be.

"but also turns a blind eye to Israels withdrawal from the Gaza strip"

Because it's irrelevant, and not exactly true. Israel created the world's largest Concentration Camp, nothing more.

"and the subsequent terror offensive of the Palestinians"

The Palestinians, for the most part, held true to a two-year, unilateral cease-fire. This ended when an Israeli artillery unit, no doubt enraged at the sight of Palestinians enjoying a beachfront that only weeks earlier had been for Israelis-only, shelled and killed an entire Palestinian family on a picnic. Israel LIED about the incident, but were exposed by international analyses of the evidence.

"was promptly signed by other idols of the anti-globalisation movement: Naomi Klein, Jose Sarango, Arundhati Roy"

As it should have been, since it was an honest, fact-based treaty, unlike this Propaganda ...

"The latter was recently only notable by a completely amiss analysis of capitalism in which globalisation - equated with imperialism - is understood as a conspiracy of “men in suits”(Americans of course), who “trek the world like locusts”.

What's "amiss" with that analysis? It's true. Read Joseph Stiglitz' "Globalization and its Malcontents", which details how, even if Global Corporatism was not initially intended to harm the poor majority, it continued implementation in light of its documented ill-effects, demonstrates Malicious Intent. Stiglitz, of course, is the former Chief Economist of the IMF, and one of the most respected economists in the world.

"Not forgetting the messias and head-of-state of the No-Globals, Hugo Chavez"

I think you mean "messianic". The Hard Right only hates and maligns this man because he's threatened their interests and conspiracy against Venezuela, and presents a viable alternative to hyper-corporate Capitalist plutocracy.

"Iranian mullah regime which is currently sedously working on the nuclear destruction of Israel"

Do you mean "sediciously"? Remember, Iran is building power stations, because they lack the refining capability to meet its growing energy demands. Also, the implied repetition of the mistranslation which claims its president called for the destruction of Israel, is a LIE.

It's actually the Fascists, supported by the author of this Propaganda, who are plotting death and destruction.

IAEA Head: Iran Attack 'Act of Madness'
 http://winnipeg.indymedia.org/item.php?5394S

"and which flaunts its president as the international figurehead of an extermination-anti-Semitism."

You'll have to elaborate. This doesn't really make any sense.

"Why the hatred for Israel and the Jews?"

WHAT? How did you get here?

These groups criticize and condemn Israel, under the rule of Zionist Extremism, because of their reprehensible, brutal, racist policies towards the Palestinians, because of their Cult-like Ideology, little different than Hitler's, their program of Regional War in the ME, and their Apartheid nature. But this isn't "hatred of Israel", as most Israelis also oppose these policies and beliefs, and are only cowed into acquiescence through fearmongering.

Nothing about Jews ...

"After every attack on a synagogue or another Jewish institution Israels allegedly disproportional military policy is at least considered as the reason for the attack."

Indeed, as no matter how long this goes on, Israel is the Aggressor, and the Palestinians, sadly excercising their right to Resist Israel's brutality.

But this should not trouble you, as the media's pro-Israel bias always ascribes blame to the Palestinians/Arabs.

"No assault on a ..."

Irrelevant drivel. No such comparison can be made.

And you conclusion then fails because it's based upon a flawed, dishonest premise ...

Field Guide to Hasbara ( Propaganda) from the WUJS
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/01/284723.html

Plain-

Just because some Academic misused the language does not mean that use is right. There were heated arguments going on between Jews in 1946 over that abuse of language.

One or a hundred partizan bigots putting up a definition on the web does not make it right. For example if you know something as an original source, a participant in the event, and try to put it into a Wikipedia where it is relevant, it gets deleted because there is no Academic reference.

That tract you quote is from people who happily lie. There were Nazis -National Socialists -in Germany until 1934 when Hitler made a massacre of he Socialist leadership and transformed the National Socialist Party into the Hitler Party. Malignant Historians and Politicians refuse to acknowledge that so they are able to discredit Socialism and built their Imperialist Global Fascism.

What they have put is as gross a misrepresentation of reality as saying that Hitler's father was a Jew, and that he made the Holocaust to kick the Jews into creating Israel and celebrate 'Next year in Jerusalem'. The inference that Hitler was a Jew is of course wrong, his mother was not Jewish. She took Jewish money to bring him up.

There is a nice bit of research to be done here - did children from mixed race marriages get sent to the death camps if it was the father who was a Jew? Jews say such children must go through conversion to be Jewish. Exterminating those unconverted would seem to put Hitler on a cattle truck too.

has anyone actually looked at the website these folks posted the link to?
there is no "reader" it's a redirect to the IDF english language news page.

IDF webpage? when I click the link I see their webpage, what´s your problem?