A debate worth having: is it worth keeping in touch with the public as it catches up with what lots of you/us people have jumped around about for years?

I hope the retort is "yes", but with good criticism, at the same time as a "cutting the crap" attitude to the myriad of absurd, preposterous overlengthy words or ways of putting things that often seem to almost intentionally put people off at the same time as getting them to think its their fault for a lack of comprehension of phrases that actually dont seem intended to!
( I saw a recent "blow by blow" deconstruction of a couple of paragraphs from the movie that were in the independent - it got me thinking quite how much "opinion influencers" - let loose to work for "flat earth corporation" types - or the equivalent "warbuxminderbinder"s, could have effect, these days, despite their own short-term interests, with current tech.)

To say that much of the present structures of what we call economics has got distorted by ther needs of actual criminal rackets for cash laundries, tax havens etc is almost a "doh, what did you expect!", but to hear the way sentient seeming people seem to let words blind them to straightforward, in your face FACTS - that IS amazing.

Its the "sharks", yes, but its also the stupid economy, stupid . . . .
. . . . but that couldnt continue without the support of "frontline/homefront" opinion influencers - but in all the "about-to-topple" disasters waiting to happen in this house of cards world - where do they think they are going to exist. "Bunkerworld" isnt all its brochures pretend.

The criminal attempt to recycle failed old plots from "gladio" type secret"homeguard" rotten burroughs - with staged "provocations", "strategies of tension", etc IS a factor in a round-up of the worst actual problems of the world, 2007. The current UK prime minister has stopped using the phrase "war on terror". . . . thats something. But - without having to fall into the "it was the
UFO chameleons, with the probe, in the dining room" chaff that clutters the internet, its about time serious people took a good sceptic approach to wonder why THEY had dismissed a few of the very unweird, STRAIGHTFORWARD, "SPOT THE SCAM", "are ALL ex-secretpolice types legit - ALL of them ?" good questions.

Good comments re reacting to movie appreciated. A leaflet? "its the stupid,stupid economy" + 2 year turnaround process, or somesuch? or "adverts". . . .

scroogle "remember wireless prog" for a reminder of the way plenty of people in the mainstream are wising up to the way old (pre) coldwar scam throwbacks work - in relation to "opinion influencing" for cash, payment in kind, cashback, holiday "upgrades" or fake promises of retirements in the sun, extradition free tax havens - despite "globalisation"(!), or the pseudogroups reminiscent of that old "arseypee" fake front from the eighties that the grauniad investigation ( by its environmental reporter) traced back to a lot of dodgy USA based fringe corporate groups.