Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Green groups pull out of nuclear consultation calling it a sham

Pete | 07.09.2007 09:07 | Ecology

GREEN GROUPS PULL OUT OF BROWN’S NUCLEAR CONSULTATION

It’s a sham, they say, in blow to ministers’ nuclear ambitions

Britain’s biggest environment groups this morning pulled out of Gordon Brown’s public consultation on nuclear power, calling it a sham.



The move by Greenpeace, the Green Alliance, WWF and Friends of the Earth – groups with a combined membership of hundreds of thousands – is born of frustration after it became apparent the consultation was a rubber stamping exercise designed to push through the Prime Minister’s pre-ordained policy on nuclear energy. It does not provide fair or balanced information and fails to fully consider the alternatives to nuclear power.



The Green Alliance is the leading green lobbying coalition, comprising all the major UK environment groups. CND has also pulled out of the consultation.



Earlier this year Greenpeace won a High Court ruling overturning an earlier consultation. In his February ruling Mr. Justice Sullivan called the first consultation “manifestly unfair” and “unlawful,” adding that it was ”seriously flawed” and “manifestly inadequate” because insufficient information had been made available by the Government for consultees to make an “intelligent response”. Greenpeace lawyers are now examining the possibility of going back to court to overturn the second consultation.



A number of meetings are being held across the country tomorrow at which just over 1,000 selected members of the public are being asked their views on nuclear power. The four green groups are now advising their members that the meetings are no more than a government public relations device.



In a keynote speech on Monday the Prime Minister declared: "I believe that Britain needs a new type of politics which embraces everyone in this nation, not just a few.” But a dossier compiled by Greenpeace and released today reveals how the replacement consultation has been designed to deliver one policy – nuclear new-build – regardless of what the public says.



Politicians appear to have pre-empted the new consultation. In February, after losing in the High Court, Tony Blair said "This won't affect the policy at all." In May on BBC’s Politics Show Alistair Darling said, "I believe that nuclear ought to be part of the mix." In July Gordon Brown told MPs, “we have made the decision to continue with nuclear power” before the new consultation had finished. The following week, after Greenpeace lawyers reminded the government of its legal obligation to consult, Labour MP Jamie Reed (a former Sellafield press officer) asked a planted question to which Brown gave a prepared answer, saying he’d only decide policy after the consultation. The episode laid bare the reality – that policy was fixed and the consultation a sham.



The nuclear dossier reveals that:



* Despite clear advice from its own environmental watchdog, the Sustainable Development Commission, who suggested that at least nine months should be set aside to properly consult, the Government has pressed on with a rushed consultation that is shoe-horned into half this time. Government officials conceded that this rush is linked to the nuclear industry’s concerns about getting new reactors built to their own timelines.



* The consultation materials provided for the public are misleading, inaccurate and biased towards nuclear power. A document claims that one of the “advantages” of nuclear power is that “it is substantially cheaper than wind generation.” (Stakeholder materials – Reference Sheet 3: The main benefits and disadvantages of the different electricity sources). Yet the Government’s own figures show that the cost of wind energy is cheaper than nuclear (See  http://www.bwea.com/energy/myths.html), but this fact was kept from the public.



* The Government has refused to delay this nuclear consultation until the findings of a further consultation on how to deal with nuclear waste has finished. No explanation for this baffling decision has ever been given. It means people are being asked to make a decision about allowing more nuclear plants, and more radioactive waste, before the consultation on how we deal with nuclear waste has finished.



* Repeated requests from NGOs for updates from Government as to how the development of public materials for the consultation was proceeding were ignored.



* Though they claim to only have a preliminary view that new nuclear power should be supported, the questions the Government has chosen to ask at public events are skewed towards painting nuclear in a good light. For instance they ask “In the context of tackling climate change and ensuring energy security do you agree or disagree that it would be in the public interest to give energy companies the option of investing in new nuclear power stations?” (Stakeholder materials – Participant Handouts 1).



* In the consultation the Government refuses to say exactly how the taxpayer will be protected from handing out massive subsidies to the nuclear industry to help it pay to decommission nuclear power stations and deal with the highly radioactive waste they produce. It merely claims industry will have to pay its “full share” of these costs.



These are just a few examples from a catalogue of problems NGOs today revealed with the Government’s nuclear consultation. For more read the dossier Talking Nonsense – the 2007 Nuclear Consultation.



Greenpeace Executive Director John Sauven said:



“This new consultation is a sham and a fraud. It manages somehow to be just as skewed as the last, and seems to have been designed to ignore the views of the public while simultaneously telling people what they should think. This government can’t get nuclear power past a fair consultation because the policy is environmentally, financially and scientifically flawed. That’s why ministers have gone for a stitch-up.”



He continued:



“A glance at the consultation document and Gordon Brown’s promise of a new kind of politics looks like a joke. Compared to Blair it’s the same style, different sofa. It’s not too late for ministers to salvage this process and avoid another legal showdown. But if they won’t listen to the public they might once again be forced to listen to a legal mauling from the High Court.”



Kate Hudson of CND said:



“Given the dangers presented to the public by nuclear power, it is vital that we have a full and rigorous inquiry. In reality it appears that, second time around, we are merely presented with yet another charade. The British people deserve better.”



The construction of new nuclear power stations would be disastrous for Britain’s efforts to tackle climate change because:



* Replacing all our existing nuclear power stations will cost billions and leave a legacy of radioactive waste for thousands of years, while cutting our carbon emissions by a mere 4% sometime after 2020. This is too little, too late and it’s hard to think of a worse way to spend the nation’s finite climate budget. That 4% reduction will be more than wiped out by the government’s plans for aviation expansion alone.



* Nuclear power stations only produce electricity. The bulk of our energy needs are for heat and transport – nuclear only marginally addresses our need for hot water and central heating and doesn’t meet our needs for transport at all.



* Climate change is a global problem requiring a global solution. According to new research, for nuclear power to play any sort of role in tackling climate change you would need to build one new reactor somewhere in the world every week until 2075.



* The Finnish Government recently gave the go-ahead for the construction of Western Europe’s first nuclear power station built since the early 1990s as a means of ‘combating climate change’. The project is already years behind schedule and hundreds of millions of pounds over budget. Worse, by taking the nuclear option investment in clean renewable technology has begun to fall away.



ENDS

Pete

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. Only the 'environmentalists' — R U D I
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech