Perhaps those of us who are on to Captain Mayday haven't been clear what our objection to him is:
In addition to his sloppy expressions of alledged anti-Zionism--which makes him attack such pointless targets as the Jews in Hollywood(mind the Aliens on that first link Wink )
or just general sloppy writing like here:
there is his near constant hysterical blather about the Nuking of Portland, Oregon , USA:
amplified by the madness of his yahoo group:
Now, chums, whatever else he may or may not be right about, does anyone really want this nutter to be representing or speaking for 9/11 Truth in any way, shape or form?
Take the article at 9/11 Blogger: "Amerika Uber Alles" -- Our Nazi Nation"
Right, it has a lot of good points and good material--that other people have said as well or better already:
David's Orcinus blog is almost soley devoted to examining proto-facism on the rise--with a bit about dolpoins every so often. In fact his writings on the subject dwarf Captain May's in both volume and depth, for example:
So why can't our Carol Brouillet repost a David Neiwert article if she wants to post on the subject? Or better yet, write her own and source it? Anything would be better than posting rubbish from someone aiding and abbetting our ex fellow truther, Webster Tarpley, in the search to "hunt down" the hoax busters.
Don't believe me? Then read the transcript that follows:
READ THE REST AT:
Suffice it to say 9/11 Truth--or 7/7 Truth for that matter--doe not need the help of any git who's worried about "the Jews is Hollywood" or any other such tot. Why Tarpley feels the need to ally himself with Captain May, we can only guess. Seeing as he was so quick to accuse those of us demanding answers from him as agents, just like an agent would do, forces us to consider unpleasant possibilities; see the list of attacks and decide for yourself:
So if you go to Webster Tarpley's Guy Fawkes/911 speech, don't challenge him if you don't want to be called "cointelpro". ;-)
On August 29th, 2007, Webster Tarpley issued the Kennebunkport Warning. It claimed “massive evidence” suggested that a US-Sponsored false flag terror attack would be orchestrated in “the coming months”. The original document listed signatures by Cindy Sheehan, Ann Wright and others. http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/08/kennebunkport-warning-hoax-controversy.html
Or did it?
At least five anti-war activists including Cindy Sheehan denied signing the document and an ensuing controversy erupted. While those who denied signing the document were civil and cordial, those who created the warning offered insults, accusations, and divisive behavior. Later, those investigating the affair were targeted with accusations and insults along with false allegations that they “opposed” the Kennebunkport warning and “worked for the Ford Foundation”. Charges of incivility against the warning promoters remain unacknowledged.
While many offered their take on the controversy, a “9/11 truth leader” responded without naming names or taking sides; giving advice on how to deal with disinformation, infiltration, and agent provocateurs. Jim Hoffman offered his thoughts on Cosmos' radio show:
"It’s so clear. What possible motive would there be someone to go making these vicious characterizations of these really well known peace activists like Cindy Sheehan… When people like [Cosmos], Arabesque, and Wolsey report on it, to be viciously attacked by Tarpley with all these ridiculous accusations of COINTELPRO…? Very entertaining to watch, very vivid, just lurid—it’s ridiculous... I think it’s a really good test of whether people are really in this in the benefit of our movement: are going to tolerate this sort of thing? Where are the voices of the alleged leaders of the 9/11 truth movement about this and similar incidents? I think the silence from some quarters is deafening." http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/10/truth-revolution-radio-october-15-2007.html