TRIDENT2 :LIBDEMS LEADERS :MINDERBINDERESQUE MEDIA OPINION-INFLUENCERS EFFECT ?
Questions . . . . questions | 19.11.2007 16:35 | Anti-militarism | Globalisation | Other Press
This, in actual fact, is a position that most serious armed forces strategists agree with, but also a position the majority of the British population agree with.
The need for choppers, more armour for under vehicles - yes, these are needs people see, people comprehend.
But the British people HAVE grown up, so that these days they DONT see the point in a bloody great signpost to the apocalypse that says "despite the fact that we DONT exist in a tense bit of the world, as a "grown-up" serious member of the UN we think we needed a flamethrower aimed at your kids or we didnt think we were dressed properly. . . . but please dont think about trying to get your own "poor-mens" versions, or use terror as a way to push YOUR opinions. . . . "
It is easy to guess that, when our arms corporations, their slushfunds, their networks of "easy-cash" short-term high-pay jobs "opinion-influencers" - that "OF COURSE" couldnt dream of doing dodgy things to the British democratic process (????) have SUCH a good reputation - seeing as the SFO inquiry was stopped - if a single thing was going to drop off the media version of this debate, it might have the "Trident-two" title.
This isnt to endorse people - this is to defuse spin.
The last leader of the libdems was seen as a "threat" by a few of these types due to the fact he raised the quality of the "international" debate - (more treaties means less warbucks, as a few people see it ), but - despite the lack of coverage, the actual debate about international upgrades to strengthening global structures IS opening - the "extradition-free tax-havens" so needed by these "cheaper holidays from other peoples miseries" types are under threat, as the most once "gung-ho" ex-army types ask the same questions about these dodgy "quagmire" situations as the "radical" peaceniks. Top brass as much as the current "stuck-in-the-muds".
Questions . . . . questions