NOOOOOO!!! Venezuela Bolivariana!
Voice of Reason | 03.12.2007 10:04
Voice of Reason
A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.
Voice of Reason | 03.12.2007 10:04
Voice of Reason
www.indymedia.org
Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Africa
Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela
Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney
South Asia
india
United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester
West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
Of course it is...
03.12.2007 11:35
The problem was many of the proposed reforms would have been beneficial:
- Article 21: Outlawing discrimination.
- Article 64: Reducing the voting age.
- Article 87: Increased workers' rights.
- Article 90: Reducing the working week.
- Article 103: Free university education.
- Article 113: Outlawing monopolies and giving the state control over the exploitation of natural resources.
- Article 256: Redusing the power of judges.
But a many would not have been:
- Article 11: Giving the President the power to take control whatever part of the country he wanted to so that he could 'defend the nation'.
- Article 67: Allowing the Government to fund electoral activities [as of it doesn't already!]
- Article 225: Giving the president the right to appoint as many vice presidents as he wanted.
- Article 230: Allowing Chavez to be re-elected indefinitely.
- Articles 337, 338 and 339: Allowing extreme powers once a 'state of emergency' has been imposed.
So what was Chavez was attempting to do was persuade people to support these 'reforms' whilst at the same time giving him the power and ability to stay in power forever.
Given the resources and the effort that Chavez's supporters put into this vote, it does seem remarkable that he lost. It is perhaps an indication that he no longer has the backing of the poor who had once so much hope in him. Whilst the police and military are strutting around the country with their new guns and powers, the ordinary people are feeling the effects of their brand of revolutionary justice.
It is very easy to see Chavez as a new Marti or Castro, but the simple fact is that he lacks the intelligence and personality to inspire people and it seems that he is now beginning to lose the support of the very people who put him into power.
James
...
03.12.2007 12:53
So, some dictator then.
It doesn't mean Chavez has lost the support of the poor, but many people in the country did not like the new proposal, including my wife, who normally votes for Chavez. Her opinion is that Chavez needed humbling, and that he was going too far. In particular, she didn't like unlimited terms. But the choice was the referendum, not between Chavez and the opposion, and at the end of the day, most people support Chavez than the opposition any day.
In the end, the last laugh is on the opposition. Chavez has shown that he is no dictator, the sheer number of elections should prove that. He may be egotistical, a bit paranoid, and perhaps even a little mad, but he is not a dictator, and his camp have come out in a far better light than the hard-core opposition, who have constantly resorted to violence, admitted on camera they were not going to accept the results even if Chavez won, and even murdered a Chavez supporter trying to go to work. Who are the democrats in this equation?
Anyway, the fact he will have to step down in 2012 means he has to give space, now, for other people to take over when he has gone, and this should encourage a faster transfer of power away from the state and to the people. I hope defeat will puncture the Chavez ego a bit. He will be a far better leader if he continues with the same policies, but more humble.
Hermes
Contradictory
03.12.2007 13:34
Guess it's back to the drawing board for Chavez' Government. I hope the people will tell him which reforms they disagreed with.
Viva Venezuela
The People Still Support Him
03.12.2007 13:37
Plus, don't discount the CIA's hand in influencing the 'no' vote. After all, this is what they do ...
A Plus B Doesn't Equal C