Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Major Corruption

R.A.McCartney | 17.12.2007 15:32 | Analysis | Anti-militarism | Other Press

John Major has protested that the Tories were not corrupt in the 80s and 90s. These claims will remain unconvincing unless they answer two questions. First, why did they give an apparently unjustifiable £300 million contract to one of the two companies involved in the arms deal illegally linked to the Pergau Dam? Secondly, who gave the tens of millions of pounds needed to fund the Tory party in that period.

Former PM John Major has attacked Labour for “systematic sleasze”, and denied that the Tories were corrupt in the 80s and 90s. Speaking on BBC One's Andrew Marr Show (16/12/07), he accused Labour of carrying out a "McCarthyite" campaign against his Conservative government. "Lots of people misbehaved in the 1980s and 1990s” he said “but they were all individuals. It was never institutional. It was never related specifically to the Conservative Party or to the Conservative government”. The corporate media have repeated these outrageous claims, but refuse to publish or broadcast the evidence which strongly points to the contrary.

If Tory governments were not corrupt, they certainly have a lot of questions to answer.

What was the origin of the tens of millions of pounds which funded the Thatcher and Major election campaigns?

When Labour MP Dale Campbell-Savours, and others, accused Marconi Command and Control Systems of committing fraud on the 1985 BATES contract, why didn't the Tory government order a proper criminal investigation?

Why did Tory Defence Procurement minister Sir Tim Sainsbury lie to Parliament in on 20th November 1987, when questioned about the cost of changes to the BATES project specification? Sainsbury said that these accounted for “less than 1.5%” of the project cost. Yet the 1991 Statement on major Defence Projects revealed that, within months, the government were claiming the changes were so massive that they had “re-defined” the project! It also showed that the price of the Firm Fixed Price contract had almost doubled , from £100 million to £190 million. According to the information issued by the MoD itself, there are only two reasons why this type of contract could increase in price. One is inflation over the three years since the contract was awarded. This could only account for a small part of that £90 million. The other possible reason for the increase is changes to the specification. In March 1979 the MOD issued a document which specifically said that changes to the specification of fixed price and cost incentive contracts “should be kept to a minimum” because they make it difficult to compare costs with what was originally agreed. In January 2004 Sir Raymond Lygo told the BBC that when he was the head of British Aerospace, they regularly charged excessive amounts for changes to the specification of contracts in order to boost profits.

Sainsbury also assured the Commons that MCCS could be forced to pay for some other company to complete the work if they failed to deliver on time and to budget. Why were MCCS not held to that? In March 1988 Campbell-Savours accused MCCS of misleading auditors about progress on the project. MCCS received interim payments worth tens of millions of pounds which were linked to progress on the project. “Claiming interim payments before entitlement” is a recognised form of fraud on MOD contracts. When Campbell-Savours made this accusation it was already becoming clear that it must be true. Why was MCCS secretly given a new contract which allowed the system to be delivered six years late, and the price to increase to over £300 million? By the time the system was delivered, in 1993, it was technologically obsolete, and virtually worthless.

Was it just co-incidence that, at the same time they made this secret agreement, the Tory government were illegally using £234 million of taxpayers' money to bribe the Malaysian government to buy arms from MCCS? Exactly how much did all these dirty deals cost the British taxpayer?

As Chief Secretary to the Treasury between 1987 and 1989, John Major was in charge of tough government spending negotiations. I personally wrote to him in the run up to the 1987 government spending round and told him taxpayers were being ripped-off by MCCS on the BATES project. This fact has been published before in The Guardian, and he has never denied it. Even without that, BATES should have caught his attention. It was one of the 20 most costly projects the MOD were funding at that time; The Independent had run a front page exclusive alleging the cost of the project had doubled; and Dale Campbell-Savours, a member of the Public Accounts Committee, openly accused MCCS of committing fraud on BATES.

The Tories continued to conceal the truth after Major became Prime Minister. The government announced it had accepted delivery of the BATES System in July 1993, and the press were told a price of £300 million had been agreed. However in February 1997 Tory Defence Procurement minister James Arbuthnot refused to answer a Parliamentary question about the price of BATES, claiming that there were continuing negotiations. This was plainly just a device for covering up the truth.

If the Tories were not corrupt, how can they defend all this as being in the interest of British taxpayers, rather than the interests of MCCS? John Major personally needs to explain why he allowed all this to happen, and did nothing to protect taxpayers' money.

Ends

See also “Thatcher gave Pergau Dam arms company 'unjustifiable' £300m contract”, Indymedia.

The following sources published Major's claims:

Ex-PM attacks Labour over sleaze, The Press Association

Major accuses Labour of 'sleaze',  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7146744.stm

John Major accuses Labour of 'systemic sleaze' ,  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/16/nmajor116.xml

R.A.McCartney
- Homepage: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/r.a.mccartney/ti/ti.html

Comments

Hide the following comment

Conservatives did "proper" sleaze.

18.12.2007 10:52

None of this centralised authoritarian New Labour sleaze. Conservatives had that independent, entrepeneurial sleaze that made Britain great.

I think what Major really wanted to say was that the Conservatives never got *caught* doing this kind of thing because they were sensible enough to keep a few lightning rods like Archer and the Hamiltons around.

Steve


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech