Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Licensed to kill

John Rhys-Burgess | 18.12.2007 10:21 | Anti-militarism | Repression | Terror War

For the past 13 years, Britain's National Security State has had the legal right to do anything that it likes.

Britain's Intelligence Services Act 1994 sets out the statutory basis of governance for the “Security Intelligence Service” or “SIS” (also known as MI6) whose function is “to obtain and provide information relating to the actions or intentions of persons outside the British Islands” and “to perform other tasks relating to the actions or intentions of such persons.. in the interests of national security, with particular reference to the defence and foreign policies of Her Majesty’s Government” or “in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom…”

The Act also provides the statutory framework for the Government Communications Headquarters or “GCHQ”.

As far as GCHQ is concerned, to all intents and purposes, the legislation gives it the right (at least as far as UK law is concerned) to intercept any telephone calls, fax and Email messages whatsoever, anywhere in the world and allows it to decide afterwards, whether the “national security” or economic interests of the UK justifies what it has done. Spy first. Ask questions later.

Whilst the legislation does not allow the interests of any particular political party to be advanced by the actions of the security services, they are however, perfectly free to target and suppress any political party or group that they and/or their government paymasters think fit.

But the most terrifying provisions of this legislation arise under Section 7 of the Act, which on the face of it, allows the Foreign Secretary to authorise any member of the SIS (or GCHQ) to do absolutely anything considered necessary to the national security or economic interests of the UK. The legislation provides that if “…a person would be liable in the United Kingdom..." (whether under criminal or civil law) "...for any act done outside the British Islands, he shall not be so liable if the act is …”authorised by the Foreign Secretary.

Quite simply, if the Foreign Secretary authorises someone to bug your phone conversations, intercept your private correspondence, raid your offices and destroy your business, spread rumours about you, blackmail or threaten you or your family, have you arrested on a trumped up charge, burgle your home and in the course of which strangle your wife after raping her (say, to disguise the fact that the burgulary was the work of a spook), abduct and fly you out to Diego Garcia or some other secret CIA prison for interrgoation and torture... if the Foreign Secretary considers that any of these actions, no matter how steeped in criminality, can even be remotely justified by British defence, foreign policy or economic interests, then they are completely immune from prosecution or even proceedings in a civil court.

Theoretically, oversight of the security services is the responsibility of a parliamentary committee but the legislation does not state how the members of such a committee are to be appointed. It is moreover difficult to imagine how this committee can properly dicharge its responsibilities given that the head of SIS or GCHQ can refuse to give any information to the committee that is considered “sensitive”.

Any “information which might lead to the identification of, or provide details of, sources of information, other assistance or operational methods available to the Security Service, the Intelligence Service or GCHQ” and any “information about particular operations which have been, are being or are proposed to be undertaken in pursuance of any of the functions of those bodies” is regarded as "sensitive". This of course exempts from disclosure practically any information whatsoever that these agencies wish to conceal, even if criminal offences have been committed (since according to the Act, they will not be crimes if the Foreign Secretary has authorised them).

Information is also sensitive if “provided by, or by an agency of, the Government of a territory outside the United Kingdom where that Government does not consent to the disclosure of the information.” This would therefore make it very difficult for an individual or organisation to challenge any rumour, calumny or disinformation spread in order to discredit them by the security services of a foreign regime, even though this may well have been obtained from a third party by torture or other coercive methods.

For example, in the recent attempt to smear Leftist MP and anti-war campaigner, George Galloway, it transpired that the main source of "evidence" against him was a member of the former Ba’athist regime currently on trial for war crimes at Abu Grahib prison. These were ostensibly allegations against Mr. Galloway made by the U.S. government, yet it is patently obvious that the whole affair was initiated and orchestrated by Downing Street as an act of petty spite against Mr. Galloway and his strongly anti-government stance. Were an enquiry to be made into this affair, there can be little doubt that the security services would also have been implicated, yet thanks to the provisions of the exisiting legislation, we are unlikely ever to find out for certain.

Even if any of the heads of SIS or GCHQ agreed to provide information requested by the parliamentary Committee the Foreign Secretary would be able to override them.

Grievances against the security services can be brought before a Tribunal which decides in the first instance whether a complaint is “frivolous and vexatious.” If the Tribunal decides that there are legitimate grounds for complaint, it must firstly decide whether or not the complaint is reasonable and if so, it must then be referred to the Secret Service Commissioner.

The Commissioner then examines the circumstances under which any warrant authorising the conduct complained of, was justifiably granted by the Secretary of State and if so, he then refers it back to the Tribunal which in turn must refer “its findings” back to the Commissioner and the Secretary of State! Since the Tribunal does not appear to have to any independent investigative powers of its own and is required to refer complaints to the Commissioner, this seems positively kafkaesque.

Any documents that the Commissioner or the Tribunal considers in the course of any complaint, cannot be disclosed to the complainant (or to anyone else) without the consent of the author of or other person providing, the document in question, so that whilst the Tribunal is charged with this quasi-judicial function of dealing with complaints against MIS and/or GCHQ, the complainant is not entitled to see all of the evidence that the Tribunal is to consider in the determination of the complaint. This is a bare faced denial of a fundamental principle of natural justice.

Moreover, the Tribunal is entitled to determine its own way of proceeding and whilst if it finds in favour of a complainant, it has to state its reasons for so doing, where it decides to dimiss the complaint, it is not permitted to give any reasons at all.

And even though the Tribunal has the power to quash any warrant or authorisation which the Secret Service Commissioner has found to have been improperly issued and may direct the payment of damages by way of compensation to the complainant, the Foreign Secretary can take such action as he thinks fit, or presumably, do nothing at all.

It is precisely this kind of pernicious legislation that has helped to create the National Security State that Britain has become under both Conservative and New Labour administrations. Given that our present government has allied itself with a neo-fascist regime whose belligerent policies and notorious human rights abuses arguably represent the greatest threat to humanity since the Third Reich, indeed, a regime presided over by a man whose grandfathe helped to finance the Nazis, for a parliamentary democracy to have granted itself these powers is in itself little short of criminal.

The question we must all now ask ourselves is, how much longer will our parliament and Press continue to look the other way, whilst our governments continue to chip away at our rights and liberties with such repressive laws.

John Rhys-Burgess
- e-mail: cmss.info@gmail.com

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. CSA,DSA,Brownieshirts SA ID fiasco — anarcho syndicaler
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech