the_reporter07 | 28.12.2007 00:15
yes folks they do understand dutie of care:???senior staff members believe that its ment for the protection of staff;(those whom make false allegation against so many of us).
but;the dutie of care care is the most important part of their employment;the protection of those tennant whom are the major reason for their employment in the first place.
it has come to my attention that barry lindsey will be appearing at the west london courts on 14 jan 08;
Lindsey imformed me that because of statment made to members of staff on phone;his responce was as always to their threat of court action;take me to court;take me to court ::::: wot must i do for you to take me to court ?
COME TO THE OFFICE AND SPILL SOME BLOOD(this was a question ment to take the piss out of another threat of court action ??????????????
would you believe hes going to court,under trust dutie of care ???to their lying,2 faced senior members of staff at Nottinghill.
Lindsey also told me that since his move to present home in 98,their has be a nieghbour whom has made his life hell, no action by trust;??????????
yet this nieghbour actaully made racial comment regarding lindsey at grove house
in 2004.still no action,still problems with nieghbour;
WHERES DUTIE OF CARE NOW
RACIAL COMMENT MADE,NO ACTION,LINDSEY BELIEVES THAT AS 80% OF STAFF HAVING DEALING WITH LINDSEY ARE OF AFRO CARRIBEAN DESCENT THAT THEIR IS A GREAT DEAL OF RACIAL DESCRIMATION TOWARDS TENNANT WITHIN UNLAWFULL SOCIAL LANDLORDS