Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Protest - why should we ask?

Mike | 14.01.2008 21:45 | Analysis | Repression | Social Struggles | Birmingham | London

"In response to the government's 'consultation' on managing protest around parliament we should not need to ask permission from 'the state' to demonstrate against 'the state'."

After our dear PM claimed his solemn duty 'to uphold freedom of speech, freedom of information and freedom of protest' some imagined that the 'harmonisation' of the currently differing legislation for static protests and marches would herald a liberalisation of the currently draconian SOCPA laws. How wrong they were, we now face yet another tightening our the legislation as if the lack of 'harmonisation' is some form of bureaucratical oversight. There are practical reasons for notifying police about a march (for example to close roads and re-route traffic) but no convincing practical reasons for a notification for a static demonstration. Nonetheless, the proposal should be challenged on principal rather than practical grounds.

The very idea that "authorisation" is required is the enemy of freedom and democracy. The idea of a static protest legally requiring notification or permission from the state is perverse and at odds with the very concept of dissent itself, especially since the police play a political role in stifling protest, something that anyone who has attended more than the odd demonstration can testify to. They intimidate protestors with surveillance, the threat of arrest if protestors are relcalcitrant to their arbitrary demands, physical control with pens, misusing laws in ways which they were originally never intended, and occasionally violence. Intimidation serves to make demonstration unpleasant and deter as many as possible from future attendance, reducing the public visibility and effectiveness of protest. In turn this serves to whittle down the numbers to committed protestors, making the surveillance and profiling of those they see as a 'threat' (people who are more likely to instigate social or political change) an easier job for police photographers and database administrators. Ultimately the implementation of this proposal would force protestors to act in a way detrimental to their aims or face prosecution. Meanwhile it would aid the state in acheiving and maintaining any morally dubious aims it seeks to uphold whilst underhandedly giving credence to the idea that the state defends protest as an enshrined right. The proposal gives credence to the idea that protestors are a group who need to be 'watched' with state intervention being necessary and desirable. It is fair to assume that protestors are no more likely to have a criminal record than anyone else; as such the attention protestors receive in relation to their behaviour is unparalled in any other realm of society. This serves to be a tacit smear campaign against protestors and an excuse for intimidation.

The government has long used "public protection issues" as a defence for police interference and protests and SOCPA laws stifling protest. The usual argument trotted out is that there is a "terrorist threat" to the houses of Parliament when protestors are present in high numbers and/or without a police presence. There is no evidence or logical explanation to suggest this would make an attack significantly easier or more likely especially given the already high security at the site. MPs would still receive a very high level of protection if SOCPA were repealed, it is highly unreasonable that they receive a small gain in security at such a high cost to the freedom to protest. History has proven that we are all targets of terrorism, with the public being many, many times more likely to suffer the consequences than those in power. Expecting the public to pay for a little extra protection for MPs with our hard won freedoms when many consider them to be responsible for policies placing us in the line of fire, smacks at a classist and aloof attitude.

There is not a need for the police to attend a protest. Their "proactive" approach is loaded with a hidden agenda and does more harm than good to the health of our democracy and society; a concept eminently more important than the prevention of a little public disorder which now and then is a fine thing, they need reminding who they work for once in a while.

Mike

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech