I don't think my article discredited that decision. But you probably don't count my or any article on an IMC as a global reaction....... ¿or do you?

EU lifts sanctions on Cuba - "Beans & Phones" 20.06.2008 01:44
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/06/401532.html

& This article had offered us another take on Cuba from earlier last week

Cuba: Interview Porno Para Ricardo 19.06.2008 00:48
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/06/401490.html

Now you're being disingenous if you really think the ending of EU sanctions won't have any effects. & Yes we all must surely know US sanctions have to stop and are evil - but we should also know it's time we sought ways of ignoring the US. Here are the figures on EU / Cuba export / import upto 2005.  http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_122460.pdf Those figures are going to get better aren't they?

Cuba Solidarity- Henry Reeve Brigade- Hurricane Katrina and the “official” silence


A prologue for our Bolivian Friends


The book FIDEL, BOLIVIA Y ALGO MÁS was given me as gift by President of Bolivia Evo Morales during his last visit to Cuba, on May 22, 2008.

Both he and Rafael Dausá, Cuban Ambassador to Bolivia, who accompanied him for this visit, informed me that the authors wished to launch a new edition, for the 80th anniversary of Che's birth, which will be in two weeks, this coming June 14. No sooner had I seen the photos, the press clippings, the chapter index and a number of paragraphs than I asked Evo and Dausá to allow me to include an introduction expressing my gratitude to the editors. “That’s what they want from you, as the book’s author,” they replied.
I read the book in one sitting the following day. I confirmed that they were my words, quoted verbatim. I was anxious to read what I had said in 1993, now that the things I had then spoken about were transpiring. I didn’t even remember how I had answered each of the numerous and serious questions, some of them very clever, put to me on that occasion, questions which made me externalize many concepts I had kept inside my head, at the risk of being misunderstood. It was an extremely difficult journey for me. Che had died in Bolivia 26 years before.
I recently saw Che’s evocative effigy, cast in bronze, on its way to Rosario, the city where he was born. I started to remember and reflected, a good while, on the things I had talked about with him, from the time I first met him to the day he left for Ñancahuanzú, in Bolivia. Such images had never crossed our minds and neither one of us had many reasons to suppose we would enjoy a long life.
Today, I am duty-bound to reiterate what I said in that country at the time of my visit. Then, I told you that our country had 40 thousand medical doctors and expounded on the ideas that inspired our efforts. I shan’t devote more lines to these, as many are contained in the book and I could not express them better or with more spontaneity.
Eleven years later, the number of medical doctors had nearly doubled and the Latin American School of Medicine, created in June 1999, had an enrolment of over 10 thousand students from the region. We were already working, as part of cooperative missions, in Third World countries, where thousands of health specialists laboured, as we had promised the United Nations in 1979, following the Non-Aligned Movement Summit held in Cuba then.
In August 2005, hurricane Katrina lashed the United States southeast and brought the sea over the poorest neighbourhoods of New Orleans. Havana is closer to that city than New York, Washington, Chicago, Boston and many other U.S. cities. Adhering to the principle that disaster-related assistance ought to be above ideological differences, we offered our help to save human lives. We immediately approached the U.S. government with this offer.
I shall limit myself to reproducing what Cuba was forced to explain, days later, on the occasion of a gathering of the ‘Henry Reeve’ Contingent, on September 4 of that year:
“It was clear to us that those who faced the greatest danger were these huge numbers of poor, desperate people, many elderly citizens with health situations, pregnant women, mothers and children among them, all in urgent need of medical care.
“In such a situation, regardless of how rich a country may be, the number of scientists it has or how great its technical breakthroughs have been, what it needs are young, well-trained and experienced professionals, who have done medical work in anomalous circumstances, and that, with a minimum of resources, can be immediately transported by air or any other available means to specific facilities or sites where the lives of human beings are in danger.
“Cuba, a short distance away from Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama, was in a position to offer assistance to the American people. At that moment, the billions of dollars the United States could receive from countries all over the world would not have saved a single life in New Orleans and other critical areas where people were in mortal danger.
“Cuba would be completely powerless to help the crew of a spaceship or a nuclear submarine in distress, but it could offer the victims of hurricane Katrina, facing imminent death, substantial and crucial assistance. And this is what it’s been doing since Tuesday, August 30, at 12:45 pm, when the winds and downpours had barely ceased. We don’t regret it in the least, even if Cuba was not mentioned in the long list of countries that offered their solidarity to the US people. We had done this discretely and without any publicity.
“Knowing that I could rely on men and women like you, I took the liberty of reiterating our offer three days later, promising that in less than 12 hours the first 100 doctors, carrying the necessary medical resources in their backpacks, could be in Houston; that an additional 500 could be there 10 hours later and that, within the next 36 hours, 500 more, for a total of 1100, could join them to save at least one of the many lives at risk from such dramatic events.
“Perhaps those unaware of our people’s sense of honour and spirit of solidarity thought this was some kind of bluff or a ridiculous exaggeration. But our country never toys with matters as serious as this, and it has never dishonoured itself with demagogy or deceit (…) in this hall only three days ago we observed a minute of silence for the victims of the hurricane which battered that brotherly people (…) and not with 1100 but 1586 doctors, including 300 additional doctors, in response to the increasingly alarming news that keep coming in. (…) We’ve already announced that we are willing to send thousands more if it were necessary. (…) In just 24 hours, all of the doctors summoned to carry out this mission, coming from all parts of the country, met in the capital. We have shown the utmost punctuality and precision.
“You bring honour to the noble medical profession. With your quick, unwavering response to the call of duty and your willingness to work in uncharted and difficult conditions, you are writing a new page in the history of solidarity among the peoples and are showing a course of peace to the suffering and imperilled human species to which we all belong.
“(…) The average age of these health professionals is 32 years. Most of them had not yet been born when the revolution triumphed and some had not even been born 15 years after the triumph of the revolution, they are the product of these hard years. The average work experience is of no less than 10 years. (…)
“U.S. Senate Republican leader Bill Frist, presently in New Orleans, admitted that “doctors and nurses are doing a great job, but the distribution of medical assistance continues to be a serious problem” and “scores of people die every day”.
“According to the Boston Globe, Louisiana and Mississippi are facing the worst public healthcare disaster the nation has known in decades.
The newspaper published declarations from Dr. Marshall Boulden, Director for Diabetes and Metabolism at the University’s Medical Centre in Jackson, Mississippi, who assistance: “We’re seeing things that we haven’t seen in many years: cholera, typhoid fever, tetanus, malaria. We hadn’t seen such conditions in 50 years. People are crammed together and wander around surrounded by excrement”.
“(…)Our doctors’ backpacks contain precisely those resources needed to address in the field problems relating to dehydration, high blood pressure, diabetes Mellitus and infections in all parts of the body —lungs, bones, skin, ears, urinary tract, reproductive system— as they arise. They also carry (...) painkillers and drugs to lower fever (…) for treating bronchial asthma and other similar complications, about forty products of proven efficiency in emergencies such as this one. (…)
“Cuba has the moral authority to express its opinion on this matter and to make this offer. Today, it is the country with the highest number of doctors per capita in the world, and no other country cooperates with other nations in the field of healthcare as extensively as it does. (…)
“The ‘Henry Reeve’ Brigade has been created, and whatever tasks you undertake in any part of the world or our own homeland, you shall always bear the glorious distinction of having responded to the call to assist our brothers and sisters in the United States, and that nation’s humblest children especially, with courage and dignity.
“Let’s go forward, generous defenders of health and of life, winners over pain and death itself!” I concluded.

These were my words almost four years ago. The pages the ‘Henry Reeve’ Brigade has written in history wherever it has undertaken or undertakes a mission, have honoured these words.
Historical events at times seem handcrafted to illustrate a particular human conviction. Some days ago, I received a copy of the article the Namibian Minister of Fisheries, who visited our country recently, published in Europe. Including it in this preface is my way of expressing my gratitude for his words. I shall quote only a number of key paragraphs, to save both space and time:
"I am a product of the Cuban Revolution. Namibians are eternally indebted to Cuba for being a caring nation with firm principles and a true friend of Namibia. Cubans shed their precious blood for Namibia's freedom and independence.
“In 1977, I left Namibia for Angola. I met Cuban internationalists for the first time in Cassinga. At that time, I knew little about Cuba and its people.
“As children, we were educated by the SWAPO leadership in exile, about why Cuban internationalists were in Angola. As children, this made us to think deeper.
“The Cubans had volunteered to assist a nation in need. They were sacrificing their lives in order to save our lives and maintain peace in Angola. This greatly inspired us, coming from a colonised Namibia. (…)
“While we were in Chibia, apartheid South African invaded Angola and mercilessly attacked Cassinga, killing many defenceless Namibians. We appreciated the care and bravery of the Cuban internationalist troops who came to our rescue.
“I left for Cuba in 1978, together with other SWAPO pioneers. We were very excited and curious. We had never seen Cuban children before and we were so keen to meet them.
“We flew from Luanda, Angola's capital, to Havana. (…), some went to the Island of Youth…in a school specifically meant for Namibian children to pursue their studies. Some, though, attended different schools on the Island, where they mixed with pupils from Nicaragua, South Africa, Mozambique, Angola, Congo, Cape Verde and the Polisario Front. No other country, big or small, has done what Cuba has done to educate young people from different nations in real need.
“At the time, Comrade Helmuth Angula was the SWAPO chief representative to Cuba. He had the responsibility to advise us on what to study and where. I first wanted to become a pilot and cosmonaut. But Angula decided that I should study food chemistry.
“When I completed food chemistry in 1981, I was honoured to have been accorded the position of best student of the school. (…) I returned to Angola in 1981. In 1984, SWAPO sent me to the UK to pursue studies in the sciences. On my arrival in the UK, I realised that many of the students at my university were misinformed about the situation in Cuba. I teamed up with students from Cuba, Nicaragua and other Latin American countries to put the record straight. I pursued studies in biochemistry with emphasis on marine fisheries, and I obtained a BSc and PhD in the same field.
“I owe my current station in society to the people of Namibia who sacrificed their lives and fought so bravely to liberate the country. But I owe everything to the Cuban Revolution. (…) I then became minister of fisheries and marine resources from 1997 till today. I couldn't have made it but for the help I, and the others, received from Cuba (…)”
The April 2008 issue (472) of New African, a magazine on African issues edited in Europe, recounts that, in the 1970s and 1980s, Cuba sent 350 thousand patriots, including civilians and doctors, to support Africa's wars of liberation, particularly to Angola, Namibia, Mozambique, Guinea-Bissau, Cape Verde and Sao Tome e Principe. In the end, Cuba’s efforts hastened the demise of apartheid in South Africa. Nelson Mandela was still in prison when Cuba, on the other side of the Atlantic, sent those forces to Africa.
What should be one of the objectives of these lines I write for my old Bolivian friends? To unmask the empire’s perfidious and hypocritical methods.
The enemy is extremely vile. It rides along on the instincts, ambitions and vanity of those it has never imbued with even a basic moral sense.
In our country, it committed all manner of crimes: it organized armed groups, introduced weapons and explosives into the country on a massive scale, invaded the nation with mercenaries who reached our coasts, escorted by U.S. aircraft carriers, warships and infantry transporters, ready to go into action as soon as the traitors secured a beachhead. It attacked our air bases with bombers marked with Cuban insignias, so as to fake an uprising of our Air Force. Hundreds of young revolutionaries lost their lives or were wounded in their heroic struggle against the mercenaries who arrived by sea or air. Captured en masse, not one of the invaders was killed or tortured.
Then came a long period of struggle against the empire’s dirty methods, which included an economic blockade, the eternal threat of a direct military action, attempts to assassinate the country's leaders, biological warfare and the terrible menace of a thermonuclear war between the world's two superpowers, a war which nearly did break out. Cuba, however, held its ground and continues to do so after half a century of struggle.
We do not pretend to be a model for the construction of socialism, but we do hope to set an example in the defence of the right to construct it.
Consider these concrete examples of the empire's cynicism:
A terrorist is sent to jail, the explosives in his possession are confiscated and the needed evidence is gathered for his trial. He is sentenced to a number of years in prison. He declares himself physically unable to move. The Central Intelligence Agency is behind the scheme. They write verses for him, publish a book of poems and present him to the world as a disabled poet denied medical attention. He is such a good faker that he manages to deceive even the jail officials. They confuse and deceive international public opinion through their media, and there is no special envoy representing “Western democracy” who does not call for the release of the disabled poet, even though the medical doctors had assured them there was absolutely nothing wrong with him physically.
Confronted with the truth, a video recording of his intense, daily exercises in places that had gone unnoticed by the prison wardens, before the request advanced by a powerful European country could be replied to, he sprung up and twenty four hours later caught a plane, and walked, accompanied by the last European emissary to meet with him, towards the paradise of democracy and abundance. A position as a public official of the empire, at an international human rights institution, awaited him. That was the price Cuba, facing the United States’ brutal blockade, had to pay the bourgeois governments so that they would maintain economic relations with our country.
Cubans have the privilege of being born in a country which, thanks to the Revolution, was the first to reach the Millennium Development Goals in the area of education: everyone knows how to read and write. There are no children with disabilities, no deaf-mutes, visually impaired or blind people, who are denied medical assistance. Educational and health services combine to protect and encourage them to overcome the challenges with which they were born.
An alleged counterrevolutionary author with narrative and communication skills need not go to the trouble of getting books printed or looking for a market. For the imperialist intelligence agencies, it is enough that he invents any dramatic thing and blame the Revolution for it. He will have money and fame. His works will earn him awards and will be divulged ad libitum. It is a gross insult to our intelligence.
Cuba trains athletes, earns more gold medals per capita than any other nation in the world, makes sports accessible to everyone to promote the health of its citizens. Wealthy countries hunt down these athletes and offer them all the money in the world, to gather players and fill their teams with naturalized athletes with native, mixed blood or black skins which in no way recall their supposedly superior races.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, the head of a rehabilitation centre, thinking Cuba would soon follow, sought to become the owner of the institution, as some of her colleagues there had done. Her intentions were unmasked and she was dismissed. She invented the theory that she was dismissed because she opposed the use of human stem cells in genetic research. She had never spoken a word about that. A son of hers, a medical doctor, hardly the brilliant type according to his employment record, worked with her at the centre. He violated ethical norms that prohibit sexual relations with patients or accompanying parties. Morally dubious, he migrated to the mother's country of origin, where he became the renowned physiotherapist of high officials. The empire couldn’t ask for better material to blackmail Cuba with!
Her request to travel abroad was turned down. We cannot give in to blackmail, that was our decision.
Che was to enrich revolutionary thought with a strategic principle when, frowning and pointing to the little finger of his right hand, during a speech before the United Nations, he stated: "We cannot afford to yield even this little to imperialism!"
He was about to travel, with a handful of Cuban internationalists, to the former Belgian Congo, where Lumumba had been murdered by imperialism under the UN troop's very noses, to be replaced by a corrupt puppet. His ideas about the world would be put to the test.
One day, at a mass rally held at Revolution Square on October 18, 1967 to pay tribute to Che, who had been wounded in combat and put to death by a murderous charge some days before, moved by the news, before the people, I expressed a number of key ideas I want to quote here:
“(…) It was a day in July or August of 1955 when we first met El Che. And in one night, as tell in his accounts, he became a future Granma expeditionary. But at that time that expedition had neither ships, weapons, nor troops. And this was the way El Che, together with Raul, joined the first two groups on the Granma list.
“(…) he was one of the most familiar, one of the most admired, one of the most beloved, and, without any doubt, the most extraordinary of our comrades of revolution (...)
“Che was one of those persons whom everybody liked immediately because of his simplicity, because of his character, because of his naturalness, because of his comradeship, because of his personality, because of his originality (…)
"He was soon to be impregnated with a profound spirit of hatred and contempt for imperialism…he had had the opportunity to witness in Guatemala the criminal imperialist intervention through the mercenary soldiers who overthrew the revolution in that country.
“(…) The idea that men are of a relative value in history may have profoundly influenced his conduct; the idea that causes cannot be defeated when men fall and that the irrepressible march of history does not stop nor will it stop because the commanders fall.
“(...) I would say that he is the type of man who is difficult to equal and practically impossible to improve upon.
“(…) when we think about El Che, we are not thinking basically about his military virtues. No! For war is a tool of revolutionaries. What is important is revolution, what is important is the revolutionary cause, the revolutionary ideas, the revolutionary objectives, the revolutionary sentiments, the revolutionary virtues.”
“(…) Che was not only an incomparable man of action, but a man of profound intellect, of visionary intelligence, a man of profound culture. I mean to say he was a man of ideas and a man of action.
“(…) he had the virtues which could be defined as the most full-fledged expression of the virtues of a revolutionary, and integral man in the fullest sense of the word, a man of supreme honesty, of absolute sincerity (…) a man in whose conduct practically no fault can be found.
“(…) A tireless worker in the years that he was at the service of our country, he did not know one single day or rest.
“(…) he studied all the problems. He was a tireless reader. His thirst for knowledge was practically insatiable, and the hours he did not sleep, he studied. He dedicated regular days off to volunteer work. He was the inspiration and the top promoter of that work (...)
“(…) this is the weak side of the imperialist enemy. Thinking that, along with the physical man, it has liquidated his virtues; thinking that, along with the physical man, it has liquidated his example.
“(...) we are absolutely convinced that the revolutionary cause in this continent will recover from the blow, that the revolutionary cause in this continent will not be defeated by that blow.
“(…) from the hearts, I say that the model, without a single blemish in its conduct, without a single blemish in its attitude, without a single blemish in its actions – that model is Che. If we want to know how we want our children to be, we should say, with all our revolutionary mind and heart: We want them to be like Che.
“No man like him in these times has raised the spirit of proletarian internationalism to its highest level.
“In his mind and in his heart, the flags, the prejudices, the chauvinisms, the egoisms had disappeared. He was willing to shed generously his blood for the fortune of any people (...)
“His blood was shed in Bolivia for the redemption of the exploited and the oppressed, the humble and the poor (…) That blood was shed for all the peoples of America (…)
“(...) That is why we should look to the future with optimism (...)"

After the memorable night in which I spoke those words, the Cuban Children’s Organization, grasping their essence, coined a new slogan: "Pioneers for communism, we shall be like Che!”
Our Rebel Army had risen from the ashes of the detachment that had arrived on the Granma yatch and won the war with the weapons it took from the enemy in combat. Che was a privileged witness of and actor in the counteroffensive that, led by the ‘José Martí’ Column Number 1, in the Sierra Maestra, reinforced by small units from other columns whose numbers, all together, did not exceed 300 men, destroyed that last offensive of Cuba's pro-Yankee military government, which had deployed 10 thousand soldiers from its elite troops to attack that bulwark.
It was as a result of those first combats, during that unequal battle, that, seeing the enemy bombs fall on peasant homes, I realized that the struggle against the empire was to become my true destiny.
I recalled the martyr of Dos Rios, our national independence hero, José Martí, and I recalled Che when, in recent days, I read a cable published by the special envoy of NOTIMEX, dated May 26, which quoted the declarations of a young Cuban who had requested permission to travel and collect one of the many awards imperialism hands out to keep the waterwheel turning:
“(…) If Cuban authorities thought that denying me permission to travel to receive the award was some kind of punishment, I must say it has been far from dramatic.
“I spent that day here at home, with my family and friends, who awarded me a symbolic scroll I had made myself (...)
“I buy an Internet card, which costs between 5 and 7 dollars, to send out my texts (...)
“I am not in the opposition, I don’t have a political program, I don’t have a political hair in my body, and that is a characteristic of my generation and today's world: people no longer define themselves as left or right. These are increasingly obsolete concepts.
“I do not belong nor have I ever belonged to a political organization. I was never a member of the Young Communists League, I never tried to join the Communist Party. I was a Pioneer because all of us, until the age of 16, had no choice but to be a Pioneer (...)
“My blog has a record of horrifying comments that startle me (…)
“I won’t enjoy social insurance or a pension when I'm old, but this gives me economic independence. I give foreigners Spanish lessons and work as a tourist guide in my city. I speak German very well. That's how I make a living".
Comments of this nature, which are immediately spread by the imperialist media, are not the true danger. What's dangerous is to make slogans out of generalizations, or, what's worse, that there are young Cubans who think this way, special envoys who weaken Cuba internally, whose journalistic work recalls the neo-colonial press of the old Spanish metropolis, which today awards these efforts.
Party members are the ones who have assumed the greatest number of sacrifices, both inside and outside Cuba. They assume as a duty what others see as a mere option. That is what the people demonstrate when they vote for the candidates who aspire to be delegates of the People's Power Assembly. Marti created a Party to lead the Revolution before Lenin did. That is the reason we were not annexed by the United States. That is the reason Cuba, with its roots and culture, exists.
Further proof of the confusion and the deceit sown by imperialism was the declaration of a renowned Brazilian singer, made the same day the above cable was published:
"If we speak about how rights and the questions of freedom and respect towards individuals are observed in the two countries, I am one hundred percent on the side of the United States and not of Cuba".
A European news agency reported that the musician justified the inclusion of a new piece, Bahia de Guantánamo, in his live repertoire, which he performed in Rio de Janeiro following the scandal sparked off by the human rights violations perpetrated against those who had been detained on charges of terrorism.
"Were I a typical pro-Cuban and anti-US leftist, I would feel no disappointment about what happened in the jails of Guantanamo”, the singer declared.
In a nutshell: the Brazilian singer asked the empire to forgive him for criticizing the atrocities perpetrated in that naval base that operates on occupied Cuban soil.
The month of June has just begun. Uncertainty and insecurity are in the air.
I ask Bolivian readers to show the same patience and sense of humour they evinced in those days, when I spoke to them 15 years ago. To continue impelling their educational and health programs. You can always rely on our support.
Were it not for the new edition of this book, this long prologue would have no reason to be.
Thank you.

Fidel Castro Ruz

June 4, 2008

 http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/reflexiones/2008/ing/f040608i.html





 http://www.elacm.sld.cu

 http://www.saludthefilm.net/ns/elam.html

 http://www.cuba-humanidad.org

 http://www.cubacoop.com/cubacoop%20ingles/inicio.html

 http://www.cubacoop.com/cubacoop%20ingles/misionmilagros.htm

 http://www.cubacoop.com/cubacoop%20ingles/yosipuedo.htm

 http://www.saludthefilm.net/ns/index.html

 http://18thcubacaravan.blogspot.com/

 http://www.ifconews.org

 http://www.cubasolidarity.com

You ask

'Why has Cuba been blockaded for 50 years?'

It hasn't. There has never been a blockade of Cuba.

Like many crazed supporters of the criminal, repressive and undemocratic communist regime on Cuba, you choose to refer to the US's decison not to trade with Cuba as a blockade. That's your right, but the dictionary definition of the word blockade means something completely different than a decision not to trade with someone.

Like many words, including freedom and democracy, it seems that the word blockade has a different meaning to the warped communist mind.

Still no Havana Indymedia site is there?

UK banks accused of boycotting Cuba

• Country's clients told to take business elsewhere
• Move follows court action against companies in US

Duncan Campbell

The Guardian,

Monday June 23, 2008


Leading British banks have been accused of operating a covert embargo of Cuba out of deference to the US. The accusation comes after revelations that Lloyds TSB and Barclays Bank have been telling clients who trade with Cuba to take their accounts elsewhere.
Although none of the major banks are prepared to go on record over their policy towards Cuba, the Guardian has learned that Lloyds TSB, Barclays Bank, the Royal Bank of Scotland and HSBC are all complying with the US blockade of the island that was condemned in the UN earlier this year by a vote of 184 to four. The US has taken legal action in the courts against multinational companies that deal with Cuba and have offices in the US.
Last week a London cigar importer and a Somerset natural food company, which imported Cuban sugar, were told by Lloyds TSB that the bank could no longer carry out transactions involving Cuba. Phil Markey, relationship director at Lloyds TSB, told one client in a letter: "I would like to find a way to continue to make these payments for you - the decision, however, is down to a full risk assessment process within Lloyds TSB."
Other leading British banks have adopted a similar policy, although all are reluctant to talk about it. A spokesman for HSBC referred to a section of the company's annual report, which quotes the US Patriot Act, and states that: "The US state department has designated certain countries (Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria) as state sponsors of terrorism, and US law generally prohibits US persons from doing business with such countries. HSBC is aware of initiatives by governmental entities and institutions in the US to adopt rules, regulations or policies prohibiting transactions with, or investments in entities doing business with such countries." The bank was not prepared to comment further.
Last year, Barclays Bank told the London branches of two Cuban organisations to take their accounts elsewhere, even though the long-standing accounts held by Havana International Bank and Cubanacam, a state-owned travel organisation, were healthy.
The bank said yesterday: "Barclays, like any global financial institution, complies with the legal requirements which apply in the countries where we do business." The bank would not comment further. The Royal Bank of Scotland said yesterday: "We comply with sanctions in the jurisdictions in which we operate."
Only the Co-operative Bank appeared to indicate that it would process money to Cuban companies. The bank said that it had an ethical policy, which meant it could not handle accounts that had "links with an oppressive regime", but it could process transactions in such places if there were no links to either the regime or the military. It would not say whether Cuba was on the "oppressive regime" list.
The Cuban embassy criticised the latest moves by the banks. "In these new tactics the Bush administration has unscrupulously exploited the pre-eminent position of the United States in the world economy," it said. "It has been quietly working under the table at spreading the scare amongst the business and the banking communities, including in the UK."
Rob Miller, of the Cuba Solidarity Campaign, said the banks were doing the US government's work for them. "No one in the US state department seriously believes that Cuba is involved in terrorism, yet it is a handy way for them to enforce what is a purely political embargo," he said. "The banks ... are the little bullies acting for the big bully."
The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform said yesterday: "We have no restrictions preventing US companies from trading with Cuba. It is a purely commercial matter for the companies involved."

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/23/cuba.usforeignpolicy


See also:

 http://www.cubavsbloqueo.cu/Default.aspx?tabid=1624

If UK banks don't want to become involved in trade with Cuba because it might damage their realtionship witht the mighty US, that's their right. Everyone looks after their own best interests, and what commercial organisation in its right mind is going to jeopardise trade with the US for a bit of trade with an economic basket case like Cuba?

The US people have decided not to trade with Cuba or with people who trade with Cuba. The US people are free to do this, just as they are free to set up Indymedia sites whenever they want to.

And where is the Havana Indymedia site?