Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Suffer the little children, to come unto a UK removal centre

John O | 27.08.2008 15:08 | Migration | Repression | Social Struggles

Report on a full announced inspection of Tinsley House Immigration Removal Centre 10-14 March 2008 by HM Chief Inspector of Prisons. Report compiled June 2008, published Wednesday 27th August 2008.

Our principal concerns about safety related to children. While staff in the family centre made considerable efforts to support children and their families, they could do little to mitigate the damaging effects of their detention, the length of which often extended into days or even weeks. While support from local social services staff had improved, there was still a lack of appropriate care planning and no formal links with local children's safeguarding arrangements. Not all staff had received child protection training.

. . . . We were disturbed to observe some unprofessional conduct by external escort staff.

. . . . we were concerned to find two recent examples of forced medication applied to detainees threatening self-harm, which had not been subject to thorough review to ensure their appropriateness.

. . . . We were particularly troubled by the plight of single women.

. . . . Living conditions were appropriate for most detainees, but the conditions for single women were extremely poor.

. . . . Their situation should be addressed as a matter of urgency.

. . . . it was of particular concern that school-age children were not offered appropriately planned and structured educational opportunities.

. . . . there were examples of detainees given tranquilisers inappropriately without their consent.

. . . . overseas escorts showed little grasp of how to de-escalate a charged situation, using control and restraint prematurely.

. . . . Prolonged detention was not adequately explained or reviewed. When detainees made bail applications for independent review of detention by a court, BIA disclosure was sometimes prejudicially late and inaccurate.

. . . . the family unit was not adequate to provide for the complex needs of children and families.

. . . . there had been no progress on substantive areas of care since inspectorate recommendations as far back as 2002.

. . . . Separation had been used inappropriately to manage detainees who had self-harmed.

Download the full report:  http://www.ncadc.org.uk/Newszine97/TinsleyHouse2008.pdf

Introduction
Tinsley House immigration removal centre at Gatwick airport, run by GSL, holds men, women and children, most of whom are awaiting removal. When we last visited we noted some improvements, but expressed concern about the detention of children in such a setting. On our return, for this full announced inspection, we found conditions for male detainees remained generally satisfactory, but all detainees lacked sufficient activities and appropriate support to prepare for release. Our concerns over provision for children remained, and we now considered that conditions for the much reduced number of single women were unacceptable.

For male detainees, who made up the majority of the population, Tinsley House remained a generally safe and respectful place. Reception and induction arrangements were sound, save for the lack of room sharing risk assessments. Security was not unnecessarily intrusive and there was little recourse to use of force or separation, but the lack of proper furniture in the separation room was excessive. There was little bullying or self-harm, although detainees were inevitably anxious about legal and immigration issues.

Our principal concerns about safety related to children. While staff in the family centre made considerable efforts to support children and their families, they could do little to mitigate the damaging effects of their detention, the length of which often extended into days or even weeks. While support from local social services staff had improved, there was still a lack of appropriate care planning and no formal links with local children's safeguarding arrangements. Not all staff had received child protection training.

While most accommodation was clean and adequate, ventilation remained poor. Staff-detainee relationships were observed to be reasonable, although this was hard to validate as history sheets were not used and there were no care officers. We were disturbed to observe some unprofessional conduct by external escort staff. Healthcare was generally good, but we were concerned to find two recent examples of forced medication applied to detainees threatening self-harm, which had not been subject to thorough review to ensure their appropriateness. Faith services were good, but too little attention was paid to other diversity issues, and interpretation was underused.

We were particularly troubled by the plight of single women. Their numbers had dwindled. At one point during the inspection, there was only one and she lay in bed most of the day avoiding the communal accommodation. The amount and quality of accommodation now afforded to single women had been reduced, and they appeared marginalised and almost forgotten. They were left to share facilities within a mainly male establishment and this could be both embarrassing and intimidating. Their situation should be addressed as a matter of urgency.

Tinsley House, in common with most immigration removal facilities, lacked sufficient activities to occupy detainees, some of whom remained at the centre for many months. There had been improvements in certain areas, for example language classes, but otherwise provision was limited. There was still no voluntary or paid work. While qualified care workers gave good support to young children, it was of particular concern that school-age children were not offered appropriately planned and structured educational opportunities.

Disappointingly, Tinsley House had made little progress in terms of preparing detainees for release. Despite our previous recommendations, no welfare officer had been appointed and this left an over-reliance on the commendable - but stretched - services of voluntary bodies.

Access to phones, including mobiles, was good and visits arrangements were satisfactory, but there was still no access to the intenet.

Tinsley House has the difficult task of managing discrete populations of single men, single women and families with or without children. Provision for the majority male population remained adequate, although all detainees had insufficient activities and limited support to prepare for release. However, our principal concerns related to children and single women. Staff did their best to support the care of children, but the centre remained poorly equipped to mitigate the inevitably damaging effects of substantial periods of detention on such a vulnerable population. Moreover, since our last visit, the numbers of single women had fallen and they were now isolated and marginalised. This situation cannot be allowed to continue and, with the opening of the neighbouring Brook House immigration removal centre, Tinsley House should be refurbished and redesigned to become a dedicated facility for families and single women who need, exceptionally, to be detained.

Anne Owers
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, June 2008

End of Bulletin:

Source for this Message:
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, June 2008

John O
- e-mail: JohnO@ncadc.org.uk
- Homepage: http://www.ncadc.org.uk

Comments

Display the following 2 comments

  1. disgusted — disgusted
  2. Smash the state! — Outraged
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech