police stop students filming in parliament square: barbara tucker arrested
rikki | 13.11.2008 12:52 | SOCPA | Repression
idiot cop who spouted non-law
letter from university
but as they began to set up their camera equipment (borrowed from the university media department), they were approached by police. all four students are overseas visitors and so are not up to speed on british law. the police told them that in order to film in parliament square, they would need a license for which they would have to apply to the council.
the students told the police that they were not filming for any commercial purpose, but the police still insisted that a license was necessary. brian haw was busy filming the disagreement, but for some strange reason, although he is not 'licensed' to film, the police did not ask him to desist.
the police then took the matter even further outside the law, and started asking the four (perfectly peaceful and compliant) students to leave the square. both barbara and brian challenged the police to explain under what legislation they were making this request, but no explanation was given.
brian is allowed to have up to 20 people with him in parliament square as part of his demonstration at any time, so he identified the four students as part of his demonstration and asked the police to stop harassing them. barbara shouted the law at the police, who clearly did not know the law and were acting outside of their duty. in the end, in frustration, after continually asking the officer to check with base and higher authority (which he didn't), she reached out to grab his radio to try and do it herself.
within seconds, the officer man-handled her, accused her of assault, and bent her arms behind her back. very soon, more than half a dozen other 'men' arrived and surrounded her, and after quite a wait, a van took her to belgravia police station.
she was held there for nine hours and released near 8pm this evening during which time she was interviewed at tea-time with a solicitor from bindmans
the police have not yet even charged her, and she is currently on police bail till monday 17th
meanwhile, the four students reappeared in the square around midday with a faxed letter (see photo) from kingston university which states they are filming for their course and not for commercial use.
they are still concerned about the law, so i accompanied them to talk to a copper (see photo) who claimed that not only can they not film without a license from the council, but that they can't film people without their permission. i ask him whether he has read the NUJ guidelines (which are supposed to have been passed to every metropolitan police officer) - he said he hadn't. i asked for him to check with his superior and he refused, saying the superior wouldn't be available for another half hour.
unfortunately, the students were still not sure enough to challenge the law directly, and although i offered to do the required filming for them, they prefered to go to a cafe and do an interview with me instead, promising to return another day to see barbara tucker, the original subject of their documentary.
i will write to kingston uni suggesting they give their students an adequate rundown of their rights before they let them out on the streets, and that they also make a formal complaint against the police for their unlawful harassment of these poor students.
it really is time the police were held accountable for this kind of misrepresentation of the law. their actions (not at all in the course of their duty, which is to keep the queen's peace) led to alarm, distress, harassment, an unnecessary and almost certainly unlawful arrest, false imprisonment, and interfering with the education of these students. not a good day's work!!
additional info:
NUJ guidelines (see point 3 especially) : http://media.gn.apc.org/photo/guidelines.html
and who can you photograph? http://media.gn.apc.org/fl/0709pix.html
GLA restrictions refer to trade or business:
Acts within the Squares for which written permission is required
5. Unless acting in accordance with permission given in writing by-
(a) the Mayor, or
(b) any person authorised by the Mayor under section 380 of the Act to give
such permission.
no person shall within the Squares-
(11) take photographs or any other recordings of visual images for the purpose of
or in connection with a business, trade, profession or employment or any
activity carried on by a person or body of persons, whether corporate or
unincorporate;
rikki
e-mail:
rikkiindymedia[@t]gmail(d0t)com
Homepage:
http://www.socpa-movie.blogspot.com
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
Yet more ways you can get yourself arrested
13.11.2008 14:59
Watch planes outside Farnborough Airport, take photos of railway stations ...
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/11/412630.html?c=on
Keith
Homepage: http://www.heureka.clara.net/gaia/
Complaint
13.11.2008 15:51
anon
reinforcement
13.11.2008 17:42
anti-cop
Complaining about police misbehaviour and brutality
14.11.2008 11:46
http://www.ipcc.gov.uk
You should only use this process to complain about the behaviour of one or more individual officers. If your complaint is about police behaviour or tactics in general, you should direct it to the commander of the police force concerned and/or your local elected representatives (MPs, assembly members, councillors, etc). If your complaint is about behaviour by the Metropolitan Police, you might want to write to Cllr Jenny Jones, Green London Assembly Member, who is on the MPA:
E-mail: jenny.jones [at] london.gov.uk
You might also want to think about writing to your local newspapers, to obtain maximum exposure of police misdeeds and embarrassing the police into changing their behaviour.
If you are complaining to the IPCC and want the matter dealt with by a formal investigation rather than by Local Resolution, then you should make this clear in your complaint. You would then need to make a formal statement at some point.
If you are considering taking legal action against the police, you would be advised to consult a solicitor first, such as Bindmans (Tel: 020 7833 4433).
More information on complaining about the police and taking legal action can be found here:
http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/how-to-enforce-your-rights/the-police/complaints-about-the-police.html
By the way, you have up to twelve months to register a complaint with the IPCC, but it would be best not to leave it too long, as then the chance of legal or disciplinary action being taken against the officer(s) concerned may well diminish. It would be best to make the complaint not too long after the incident, and to record in writing everything you remember about the incident at the very earliest opportunity.
If you are the victim of police brutality, get any injuries photographed and documented by your doctor as soon as possible after the incident. If you are in custody at the time, you should insist on the duty doctor checking out your injuries, and also insist that the injuries are photographed and thoroughly documented both by the duty doctor and the custody sergeant, and ask for a copy of the custody record upon release (or get your solicitor to do that for you). But you should also get your injuries checked out and fully documented by your own doctor or a local hospital once you are released.
Sir Paul Hussey
Homepage: http://www.ipcc.gov.uk
tourists???????
14.11.2008 12:15
minty challis
e-mail: minty.challis@yahoo.co.uk
Homepage: http://myspace.com/mintychallis....myspace.com/stop_the_killin.facebookmintychallis
Not Again
14.11.2008 14:10
What ?????
Police & Misconduct
15.11.2008 16:34
FROM DEC 1ST NEW POLICE & MISCONDUCT REGULATIONS WIULL COME INTO EFFECT' - Not before time!!
Police with crime records defended
A police force defended its officers after it was reported some have criminal records for offences such as assault, fraud and gun crime.
Hampshire Constabulary said a criminal conviction does not "preclude employment" after it emerged there are 42 separate convictions among its 4,000 officers.
A force spokesman would not comment on reports that the convictions included benefit fraud, discharging a firearm, possession of a cannabis plant, being drunk and disorderly, assault and theft.
He said they expect "high standards" from officers and staff and each conviction is dealt with according to "individual merits and circumstances".
He said: "Hampshire Constabulary adheres to national standards for the discipline procedures for both police staff and police officers.
"The Home Office sets procedures to be followed for officers with criminal convictions. A criminal conviction does not preclude employment, however very careful consideration is always given to people with convictions."
The spokesman added that some of the convictions against officers happened during their youth before they joined the police service.
The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) said those in the force are subject to the Police and Misconduct Regulations set by Government. The regulations include a reprimand, fine or reduction in rank and decisions are left to individual forces.
Paul West, ACPO lead for the Professional Standards Working Group and Chief Constable of West Mercia, said: "Where wrongdoing is alleged, police officers are investigated and action taken as appropriate to each case.
"It should be remembered that there are just over 140,000 police officers in the country, the overwhelming majority of whom serve the public with dedication. From December 1 new Police and Misconduct Regulations will come into effect which will simplify and speed up the discipline process."
aonon