Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Palestina: Amid Indifference and Inefectiveness

posted by F Espinoza | 08.01.2009 14:20 | Palestine | Terror War | World

Former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon told the Israeli parliament on April 22, 2004, "The support of President George W. Bush for Israel’s plan for the Palestinian territories is an unprecedented success." Those words summarize why there has been no solution to a conflict that worsens by the day.



Palestina: Amid Indifference and Inefectiveness

ELSON CONCEPCION PEREZ



Former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon told the Israeli parliament on April 22, 2004, "The support of President George W. Bush for Israel’s plan for the Palestinian territories is an unprecedented success." Those words summarize why there has been no solution to a conflict that worsens by the day.

Since May 11, 1949, when the United Nations admitted Israel as a member state, 60 years have passed characterized by three aspects: the constant Israeli violation and occupation of territories belonging to Palestine, Syria and Lebanon; total military support and incentive from the United States; and international indifference led by the ineffective institutions of the UN itself, whose resolutions are boycotted by the United States or have not helped to lessen the conflict.
International indifference, the unworkability of the UN Security Council, and the internal division within the Palestinian movement have all taken their toll.
The Arab States, the Non-Aligned Movement and other European, Asian and Latin American nations have proposed obligatory actions to require Israel to cease the occupation and the attacks. But time and time again, that hand is raised by Washington with its veto to take away any possible validity of those initiatives.

RESOLUTIONS AND NO SOLUTIONS

In 1947, Resolution 181 of the UN General Assembly established the existence of a Palestinian State and a Jewish State, as well as a zone under international control in sacred places such as Jerusalem and Belen. The resolution was never applied and six months later, on May 15, 1948, Israel began its aggression in what was called the first Arab-Israeli war.
After the forced expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their lands, the UN adopted Resolution 194 of December 11, 1948, demanding the return of the refugees to their homes. But that was just another of the international demands that was never obeyed by the Israeli government.
If there is any UN Security Council agreement that shows how fragile the UN is and how little respect it receives from Israel and the United States, it is Resolution 242 of November 22, 1967, which demands a just and lasting peace in the Middle East that includes the withdrawal of the Israeli Army from the occupied territories.
Subsequently, in 1979 the Security Council approved resolution 446 that declared illegal the Jewish settlements that Israel began to build and has continued to erect in the occupied territories.
The adoption of Resolution 478, which sharply rejects the approval by the Israeli parliament declaring Jerusalem as its capital; Resolution 497 that invalidates the Israeli annexation of the Syrian Golan Heights; Resolution 3236 that establishes the right of the displaced or expelled Palestinians to return to their homes, and many more, have become documents shelved as part of the international indifference to the conflict. This, thanks to the Israeli non-compliance and the backing of the United States in its double standard policy.

THE RIGHT TO RESIST

It is the Palestinian population that has withstood the worst of the situation. Thousands have been killed, wounded or mutilated, massacred by the Israeli bombs, missiles and tanks. Tens of thousands have lived during decades in refugee camps within their country and in neighboring lands.
Meanwhile, the Israeli settlements grow, as is the wall being raised along kilometers of Palestinian land.
Another measure is the closing of the borders with Egypt and Israel, as part of the genocidal policy that deprives the Arab population of medicines, food, electricity, water and other basic resources.
Under these circumstances, Palestinian resistance is the only possible weapon to defend the existence of the nation itself, its independence and the right to exist as a state of its own.
However, an internal element, the division among Palestinians, makes their cause more vulnerable.
External pressures and concessions in search of a final solution appear to feed a path of clear desperation in the application of unfavorable methods of waging war.
Today, Palestine is divided. Gaza, with 1.5 million inhabitants, is a besieged, attacked, massacred city, with 80 percent of the population facing hunger. It is governed by the Hamas group, which won in elections, and which the US brands as terrorist.
Since the death of historic Palestinian leader of President Yasser Arafat, Israel and the United States have put all their efforts towards fomenting division.
On the one hand are the political and diplomatic policies of Palestinian National Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who still trusts in The Road Map plan, and others equally unrealistic and unviable plans as long as the US is both judge and jury. On the other is the Islamic resistance led by the Hamas movement, in Gaza.
Bush and the aggressive US governments; Israel with its thirst for territories and blood; the UN with resolutions that don’t resolve; and the divided Palestinian movement, make peace in the Middle East increasingly less viable and especially for the suffering Arab population that Israel wants to fence into true ghettos.


 http://www.granma.cubaweb.cu/english/news/art0046.html

posted by F Espinoza

Comments

Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Why no solution?

08.01.2009 17:27

Have you considered the possibility that the current apparent stalemate is the BEST of a horrible set of choices for all parties?

At any time they wanted to, the Israelis could "force" statehood on the Palestinians. All they need do is entirely pull out of the West Bank (temporarily giving up Jerusalem) and allow the Palestinains to control THEIR SIDE of the their borders with the outside world. Then note the following"

1) The Israelis can then LEGITIMATELY have their side of those borders shut tight. You have no way to demand they let you supply the Palestinians or supplies in or out THROUGH ISRAEL (if you don't believe that, look at a map -- Israel would NOT be surrounding either part).

2) Reality is that to be economicly viable the Palestinians need to be supplied via Israel and need a transit corridor between (it's really a long way around via Egypt and Jordan). But they have no "coin" to pay for that except Jerusalem. You are going to want to say "but they can offer peace" but you forget that the strong don't NEED peace from the weak.

3) Since the reality is that some Palestinians will continue to attack across the border and a "state" is considered responsible (if the attacked neighbor insists) the Israelis can more or less force a civil war upon the Palestinians or be crushed in war -- with the Israelis being careful not to "reoccupy" and so assume no responsibility for the population.

Might I humbly suggest that the reasons we aren't seeing much progress might be things like ......
a) Perhaps lots of the Israelis don't want to be killing huge numbers of Palestinians.
b) Perhaps the Palestinians consider that a civil war would be worse than oppression by the Israelis -- at least they aren't killing each other.
c) Some of you possibly want to suggest that the "solution" would be for the Israelis to cease to exist. I might agree that is the only way I can see to "peace" for the Palestinians but it shouldn't surprise you if the Israelis don't see it that way.

Look at your own history with regard to Ireland in the 20's. However the Irish look at this (how some of them betrayed the cause by signing acceptance of the 26 and how that led to their civil war) the reality is that you Brits could have forced this on them any time you chose by simply withdrawing from the 26. You didn't NEED a "signed agreement" to do that (but lacking one, would have ended up killing a lot of Irish).

Mike Novack


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Why no solution?

08.01.2009 17:27

Have you considered the possibility that the current apparent stalemate is the BEST of a horrible set of choices for all parties?

At any time they wanted to, the Israelis could "force" statehood on the Palestinians. All they need do is entirely pull out of the West Bank (temporarily giving up Jerusalem) and allow the Palestinains to control THEIR SIDE of the their borders with the outside world. Then note the following"

1) The Israelis can then LEGITIMATELY have their side of those borders shut tight. You have no way to demand they let you supply the Palestinians or supplies in or out THROUGH ISRAEL (if you don't believe that, look at a map -- Israel would NOT be surrounding either part).

2) Reality is that to be economicly viable the Palestinians need to be supplied via Israel and need a transit corridor between (it's really a long way around via Egypt and Jordan). But they have no "coin" to pay for that except Jerusalem. You are going to want to say "but they can offer peace" but you forget that the strong don't NEED peace from the weak.

3) Since the reality is that some Palestinians will continue to attack across the border and a "state" is considered responsible (if the attacked neighbor insists) the Israelis can more or less force a civil war upon the Palestinians or be crushed in war -- with the Israelis being careful not to "reoccupy" and so assume no responsibility for the population.

Might I humbly suggest that the reasons we aren't seeing much progress might be things like ......
a) Perhaps lots of the Israelis don't want to be killing huge numbers of Palestinians.
b) Perhaps the Palestinians consider that a civil war would be worse than oppression by the Israelis -- at least they aren't killing each other.
c) Some of you possibly want to suggest that the "solution" would be for the Israelis to cease to exist. I might agree that is the only way I can see to "peace" for the Palestinians but it shouldn't surprise you if the Israelis don't see it that way.

Look at your own history with regard to Ireland in the 20's. However the Irish look at this (how some of them betrayed the cause by signing acceptance of the 26 and how that led to their civil war) the reality is that you Brits could have forced this on them any time you chose by simply withdrawing from the 26. You didn't NEED a "signed agreement" to do that (but lacking one, would have ended up killing a lot of Irish).

Mike Novack


I wonder

08.01.2009 18:41

how many of the Gaza strip people would emigrate to Cuba given the chance? As they claim to be after freedom I don't expect many would. After all in Cuba there is no free speech, no free press, no free trade unions, no freedom to use the internet and no free polical parties. And every one has to chant the lie about the great health and education system for 5 hours a day but strangely few foreigners are ever allowed to tour the isalnd freely to find out whether these claims are true or not.

Pete


Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech