Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

CCTV coming to Forest Fields unless we act NOW!

Burford Road Resident | 26.01.2009 02:12

On Friday 23rd January, I received a letter through my door from the council. It seems that the "Area 4 Neighbourhood Management Team" (I don't remember asking to be managed by anybody - do you?!?) have decided to foist a CCTV system upon Forest Fields, and we only have a short time to voice opposition before their deadline on February 2nd.

Typical re-deployable camera
Typical re-deployable camera


I have no idea how many people have to complain before our new "Neighbourhood Management" overlords are forced to re-think their plans for community domination - that is, if they listen to us at all! But since time is short, I'm posting this up here in the hopes that a few more people will write and express their objections, and that we may at least be able to delay matters long enough to get a proper campaign of resistance against CCTV organised in Forest Fields, and get CCTV off our streets and out of our community for good.

The first problem is that I don't know where all the CCTV cameras will be. Apparently there will be seven masts installed, with a total of three redeployable cameras between them all.

I know that one mast is planned for the corner of Berridge Road and Burford Road, since I live in the area covered by this camera and was thus "lucky" enough to be asked for my views on it. Unfortunately, the map included with the letter only shows my most local proposed mast, so I have no idea where the rest will be.

But I have a strong suspicion that another will be somewhere on Ewart Road, since I think I saw the same "Fakeon" (aka. pretend cops) team posting things through doors there on Saturday.

If you are living near a proposed camera site, chances are you'll probably have heard about it by now. Please let us know where the other sites are planned for!

Even if you haven't been asked for your views, I doubt it would do any harm to express your objections as another concerned Forest Fields resident. The addresses to contact appear below. I believe actual pieces of paper tend to register a little bit better in these kind of matters, but email is a reasonable second best choice, and phoning the least best option since it can more easily be ignored or misrepresented.

Now, I'm sure you already know that numerous studies carried out by the police and government themselves have found that CCTV has little to no effect on crime in residential areas - at best moving it into adjacent areas and helping to solve a tiny percentage of total incidents. The police seem to want to improve this ratio by installing more CCTV cameras, literally everywhere, with better quality images. Because of course, it's always easier to excuse the investment in more hi-tech spying equipment (while sidestepping the real issues of poverty, tremendous imbalance of wealth, erosion of local facilities, non-accountability of those in authority etc.) with the justification of "if only we had better cameras and more of them, we'd be able to prevent more crimes". (Did I mention terrorism?)

Why not just admit that CCTV is already highly intrusive and oppressive, and does little in the way of protecting the public from... well, anything really!? Beats me - but then I'm not hell-bent on creating a total surveillance society or "managing" people!

But my personal loathing of CCTV cameras aside, my main objection here on Burford Road is that we simply don't need it! There is very little in the way of any discernible crime or so-called "anti-social behaviour" (ie. kids hanging out with their mates, let alone lurking muggers) around here, and therefore I see no justification whatsoever for installing a CCTV camera here.

This part of Burford Road is absolutely not a crime hotspot - so why does the council want to spy on what goes on here?

"In case an incident happens" is NOT a good enough reason to justify blanket surveillance of OUR community.

We are fortunate in Forest Fields (and especially on Burford Road, in my experience) to live in an area where people are still friendly and talk to each other on the street. A sense of community is a pretty valuable and rare thing these days, and once it's lost, it can't easily be replaced. Long may it continue around here!

CCTV will change our (and others) perception of where we live for the worse. I find it oppressive and intrusive, and despite having been mugged twice in my life, being watched doesn't make me feel any safer. If anything, CCTV makes me feel like I'm walking down a street where trouble is inevitable – where community doesn't exist.

If you're the sort of person who cares about property prices, you can also guarantee that the presence of CCTV on your street will knock a few grand off the price of the houses there, by making potential buyers think it's a dodgy area. (Whether that assumption then goes on to become a self-fulfilling prophecy, is perhaps something else that needs to be asked!)

So, on Saturday I printed of 100 copies of a friendly little note (which was much less ranty than this Indymedia posting) and posted it through 100 front doors in the vicinity of the proposed camera site near my house. I have since had several other households let me know that they will be writing to express their objections, so you never know, it may actually work!

Perhaps people near the other proposed camera sites might like to do the same, and maybe we can nip this entire nightmare in the bud right now?

However, I don't expect the council pen-pushers to back down without a fight, which is why I think it could perhaps be most productive at this point to focus on delaying things - by calling for more time for public consultation, if nothing else - so that we'll have a bit longer to get more people on board and organise against this anti-social attack on our community.

February 2nd is really not far away - and I'm sure that too, is a deliberate plan of our "Neighbourhood Management" overlords, since we couldn't possibly be allowed long enough to organise any sort of REAL public consultation, could we!?

But here's hoping we succeed, and that Forest Fields remains the fantastic little village we've come to know and love!

The address to contact:

Area 4 Neighbourhood Management Team
The Mary Potter Centre
Gregory Boulevard
Hyson Green
Nottingham
NG7 5HY

Phone: 0115 8838469
Fax: 0115 8838471

Email:  myvoice.abrp@nottinghamcity.gov.uk


Text of the letter that came through my door:

Date: 22nd January 2009

Dear Resident

Before we install CCTV, we need to consult with residents who will have a mast, and therefore possibly a camera, near their home.

Please would you read the attached information and complete the form and return it to us, or telephone or e mail us if you have any objections or concerns by Monday 2nd February 2009.

Thank you.

Yours faithfully

Area 4 Neighbourhood Management Team

CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION
REDEPLOYABLE CCTV CAMERAS

Nottingham City Council has endorsed an approach which will see investment in re-deployable CCTV cameras across the City in order to help tackle crime and anti-social behaviour in the City’s neighbourhoods.

There will be 7 columns installed across the Berridge ward. However, there are 3 cameras for the whole police division, which will be redeployed according to priorities.

It is proposed to carry out the following works:-
• The installation of a CCTV column.
• The facility for a re—deployable colour Pan Tilt and Zoom Camera to be mounted on this column when required.
• The approximate position of the column is shown on the attached map.

The works will involve:-
• Digging of the road/pavements to install foundations for the camera columns.
• Digging of the road/pavements to install electrical cables.
• Provision of safety barriers where work is being carried out.

Who will decide when to install the re-deployable camera?

These CCTV units will be deployed on a rotational basis. The Police will prioritise the deployment of these CCTV units to assist in the prevention and detection of crime and anti- social behaviour.

It must be understood that whilst the column will be permanent the camera will be installed on a temporary basis to assist in combating anti-social behaviour and improving community safety.

What will the benefits be?

These cameras can be moved to where they are most needed. They will produce good quality images and will be used to provide evidence if an incident takes place.

Who will monitor the cameras?

The cameras will be monitored from the City’s Surveillance and Monitoring Control Room and if the operators are alerted to an incident of crime they will notify the Police to respond to the incident.

Who can I contact if I have any concerns whilst the works are underway?

John Broomfield
CCTV Manager
0115 9151885

Inspector Gurmit Kaur
Radford Rd Police Station Local Area Commander
0115 9670999 ext 4460

Area 4 Neighbourhood Management Team
0115 8838469

Burford Road Resident

Additions

Check out the oxford campaign against CCTV

26.01.2009 12:35


This is obviously a national issue. Many people feel that these cameras deter criminal / anti-social behaviour. Others, that it is simply an expensive method to displace such activity to other areas without such cameras. It is interesting that such imagery is quite rarely used in court to gain convictions. The image quality to be evidently useful, tend to come from the higher-end, more expensive kit.

Det Chief Insp Mick Neville, the officer in charge of CCTV for the Metropolitan Police, had warned that the surveillance systems are often ineffective because they are badly maintained or sited, or their footage is not properly monitored and used.

Graeme Gerrard, the head of CCTV at the Association of Chief Police Officers, has said cameras often fail to act as a deterrent for drunken yobs in town centres.

Who does watch the watchers? The Information Commissioner? The office has years of backlog of cases to shuffle through. The reason many are against these technologies is the lack of authorities accountability. Do you trust their motives? Many of us don't.

Firm threatens action against CCTV whistleblower
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/19/cctv_server_vuln_flak

Check out Oxfords' Cowley Road Campaign at:
No CCTV:  http://www.no-cctv.org.uk

Cowley Road, Oxford Campaign latest at:
 http://www.no-cctv.org.uk/campaigns/no_cctv_on_cowley_road.asp

Recently, on the newswire:

No CCTV Meeting 27th Jan
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/01/420211.html

Watching the watchers in Nottingham [feature]
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2009/01/419530.html

Surveillance of Nottingham City Centre [Update] {links to lots more}
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2009/01/419536.html

CCTV 'Treasure Hunt' around Nottingham
 http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2009/01/419329.html

Tash


Posters!

29.01.2009 12:12

I've made these posters which are now up in the Sumac.

A printable PDF file is attached if anyone wants to make any more out for anywhere else.

I've also set up an email address, so anyone else who is interested in organising opposition to this can get in touch:  no_cctv@forestfields.org.uk

Finally, a number of us are going to attend the "Local Action Group" meeting organised by the police and "Neighbourhood Management Team" (!?!), on Thursday 5th February at 6.30pm at Forest Fields Community Centre on Sturton Street.

The meeting is supposedly for local people and representatives of local groups to identify the priorities the police and city council should be working on in their area.

However, we intend to strongly identify the priority of keeping CCTV cameras out of OUR community, and bring into question the accountability of those who have appointed themselves to "manage" our neighbourhood, and make decisions like this.

Burford Road Resident
mail e-mail: no_cctv@forestfields.org.uk


Comments

Display the following 8 comments

  1. Forest fields is a safer area than most as it has good community — Universal Confederalist
  2. Just refer to the council's report... — Anti CCTV
  3. Letter written — ff resident
  4. Possible things to do ........ — Tash
  5. Letters sent — Burford Road Resident
  6. perceptions of their safety — Another resident
  7. Deadline apparently ISN'T 2nd February — Burford Road Resident
  8. Forest Fields CCTV Update — Forest Fields Folks Against CCTV
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech