Today, NATO stands for:
* world-wide military interventions, at the moment for example in Kosovo and Afghanistan, with an operation in the Mediterranean Sea and a training mission in Iraq, which trains police and military in Iraq. With the latter three military operations NATO activily participates in the so-called „war on terror“, which ultimately means the enforcement of Western hegemony and resource interests;
* the illegal stationing of nuclear weapons in Europe and the insistence on the illegal and inhuman nuclear first strike option;
* the disengagement from international law, for example through the bombardement of Yugoslavia contrary to international law in 1999, and generally the option to go to war without a mandate by the UN (self-authorisation of NATO);
* structural violence: the expenses for armament of all NATO members amount to more than 70% of global military expenditure. This money is not available to solve social or environmental problems world-wide.
In short: for us, NATO stands for the maintenance of the global status quo, the military protection and enforcement of Western economic, resources and hegemony interests and as a consequence the exploitation of the countries of the South. NATO in fact turns into the military arm of the G7 states (G8 minus Russia), especially during the present financial and economic crisis this military arm can quickly become even more important.
The 2009 NATO summit: Agreements to fight wars and to violate international law
At the NATO summit the heads of state and government of the NATO member states will discuss the continuation and development of these policies, and will make corresponding decisions. This is in fact an agreement to violate international law and to carry out wars of aggression. We will react to this with our nonviolent resistance.
The action: Shut down NATO
Nonviolent action against the NATO summit
On 4 April, a range of groups will express their protest against NATO and will attempt to obstruct the NATO summit in Strasbourg. We understand ourselves as part of the international protest movement 'No to war -No to NATO' and we will participate in these protest with our own significant nonviolent action.
We want to show that NATO goes over corpses, and that we will confront this policy. With our action, we want to remember the past and future victims of NATOs wars and of military armament, and want to express very clearly, which interests are being pursued with NATOs strategies. The action will be provocative, but strictly nonviolent, even when our opponent attempts to clear us out of the way with violence. In the case of legal charges, we will put forward our legal view also in court and in doing so will enrich the public debate. According to our legal view, civil disobedience in most cases cannot only be justified morally/ethically, but also legally.
The undersigned call on everyone to participate in the nonviolent actions in Baden-Baden and Strasbourg.
Werkstatt für Gewaltfreie Aktion/Baden, Friedenskreis Halle, Deutsche Friedensgesellschaft – Vereinigte Kriegsdienstgegner/innen, Bund für Soziale Verteidigung, War Resisters' International, Vredesactie – Bombspotting, Union Pacifiste
Information regarding the organisation of the action
Very important: we ask all participants to arrive early, on 1 April 2009. There will be an action camp, where will will offer nonviolence training, so that we can prepare ourselves well for the action. It would be even better if you could form groups in advance and can participate in a training in advance, and form affinity groups. All necessary information for the preparation of the action will be available in the coming weeks on our web page http://wri-irg.org. It is also important to be aware that the law and jurisprudence in France regarding civil disobedience might be different from your own country (More information in the near future at http://wri-irg.org). Inform yourself and come to Strasbourg!
Andreas Speck, War Resisters' International, Tel +44-20-7278 4040, Email email@example.com, Web: http://wri-irg.org.
French law is different from the law in other countries. We are presently investigating the potential legal consequences of an action of civil disobedience. What is clear at present is that a blockade is an un-authorised assembly, and can be dissolved by the police.