Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Public Debate - Resisting War Crimes is not a Crime?

Smashy | 29.06.2009 14:26 | Smash EDO | Anti-militarism | Iraq | Palestine | South Coast

On January 19th this year,during the bombardment of Gaza six people entered the EDO/ITT arms factory in Moulescoombe and caused extensive damage. On May 4th thousands took to the streets for a mass demonstration.



We ask:

Is direct action the way to fight the War Machine?
Is breaking the law to prevent war crimes justified?

PUBLIC DEBATE

FRIENDS MEETING HOUSE,SHIP ST

TUESDAY JULY 7TH

7.PM


www.smashedo.org.uk

Smashy
- e-mail: smashedo@riseup.net
- Homepage: http://www.smashedo.org.uk

Additions

Smash EDO debate postponed

30.06.2009 18:55

We are postponing this event til a later date in July/August to alllow more people to come

watch this space ...

smashy


Comments

Hide the following 10 comments

One step back

29.06.2009 16:34

I can understand that it is necessary for a movement or campaign to constantly reassess it's self but asking the question 'Is breaking the law to prevent war crimes justified? ' seems like a step backward for the SmashEDO campaign not to mention insulting to those that have faced charges in the past. In the past SmashEDO has always encouraged diversity of tactics.

This talk could equally be accompanied with a critique of law and government. The liberal manner in which the question is presented justifies the governments that go to war and allow arms trading in the first place.

@non


Smashy has proved themselves in anti-combat

29.06.2009 22:48

@non, you are correct, the Nuremberg Principles make it a duty to oppose immoral laws, it shouldn't be a matter for debate. And yet it is. I am sure from their previous posts Smashy also knows that and this article is just to make that point better known. You don't want to live in a bubble for obvious reasons.

Danny


@non

29.06.2009 23:43

Erm, I think it is what they call 'engaging the public' and 'seeking consensus'.

It's pretty obvious that Smash EDO and many other groups have no little doubt about direct action and decommissioning... and give the "liberal" shit a rest eh.

Ray Milandmine


Can't see the point

30.06.2009 02:47

of this myself. The way to engage people and argue for what we're doing and against the war machine is by flyers, posters, websites, writing to local papers and every other means of communication and publicity we can think of. Above all, we debate by what we DO and by talking to people and discussing the issues in pubs, shops or wherever we are. A meeting on a summer evening in a gloomy hall on the sweltering Euston Road isn't going to attract anyone but a handful of activists opposed by a few ultra liberal, pointy-head idealogues. This isn't where, how or with whom to have the debate that matters.

Stroppyoldgit


erm

30.06.2009 04:21

"The way to engage people and argue for what we're doing and against the war machine is by flyers, posters, websites, writing to local papers and every other means of communication and publicity we can think of.Above all, we debate by what we DO and by talking to people and discussing the issues in pubs, shops or wherever we are."

All of this has been done, including the making of movies.
 http://www.smashedo.org.uk/resources.htm#2

" A meeting on a summer evening in a gloomy hall on the sweltering Euston Road isn't going to attract anyone but a handful of activists opposed by a few ultra liberal, pointy-head idealogues. This isn't where, how or with whom to have the debate that matters."

There isn't going to be a debate on the Euston Road - thats why it says Ship Street, cos its a local debate in Brighton and I'm sure that its designed to counter the police claims spread by the Argus, as well as to encourage those who support the campaign, but have misgivings about the methods to get more information on the thinking behind the actions.

mate of the smashnics


@ Ray Milandmine

30.06.2009 11:26

@ Ray Milandmine
I wasn't trying to be quite a scathing as I think you are making out. I was just noticing that it seemed to be a shift.

The idea of a talk like this being about consensus is absurd. There is no possible way to have consensus on an issue like this that is why we have diversity of tactics and autonomous action.

I can understand the need to engage the public but it's the way the question is phrased not the meeting its self that I take issue with.



@non


@non

30.06.2009 11:48

Apology accepted, and in the spirit, I'll admit my bit about consensus was a bit daft. There would be no chance of getting consensus in a public consultation... well next to none.

So, yeah something of a PR exercise. It is indeed debatable whether it will achieve anything an any results will be immeasurable, but it certainly won't help publicly decrying the attempt to engender some dialogue with the fellow Brightonians and get themselves across without the shitstirring shitrag the Argus getting in the way, or the police scaremongering, or ITT/EDO sneaking around talking crap posing as ordinary punters.

So, I'd ask if if your cynicism is really worth the succour to those who may wish to derail Smash EDO? In other words, some people may not see the point or like the format, but unless you have positive input perhaps it is best to gracefully stay out the debate.

Engaging the public/locals has a chequered past, but it can often work- look at the recent Heathrow stuff and many road building campaigns.

Doing nothing of course has a gloriously consistent past, unfortunately the reliable results are purely negative and gives shitstirring shitrags like the Argus all the vacuum they need.

Ray Milandmine


@ Ray Milandmine

30.06.2009 12:59

Again I was in no way suggesting you 'do nothing'. I encourage debate if the question is worth asking.

Its not a case of 'if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all'. The reason I felt the need to say anything at all was because I wish to see the campaign win!

To elaborate on my original point.

What if the majority of people at the debate where against breaking the law? Would the SmashEDO campaign continue with diversity of tactics or indulge local opinion (or to be more honest, the opinion of those who care to turn up which which I would suggest in its self probably doesn't represent a key demographic though I may be wrong)

So trying to be constructive maybe the question I would pose would be 'How do we fight the War Machine?'. In this case if the mood on the night allows debate to develop then it would be very easy to move past questions like 'Is breaking the law to prevent war crimes justified?' which are likely to end in arguments based on ideological divides (predictably between liberals and anti-authoritarian types) and onto taking effective action.




@non


Okay I'm running out of ends of stick get the wrong end of now.

30.06.2009 13:41

Okay, I get you now.

Yeah, given the general level of apathy there is a real danger the event could be hijacked by people with an agenda, or just dominated reactionaries. Again, this will always be a danger, and again there is no real way of avoiding this other than not holding an event... which again plays into the hands of the local shitstirrers.

How much of this will be a meet & greet and how much will be a 'consultation' with an agenda is unknown to me- having nothing to do with them- but again the only other option is silence and the manipulation of the local press.

It's quite obvious that there is no public mandate for or against Smash EDO or EDO itself. It's the nature of activism: logically only the issues that don't get addressed, become activist issues. The reasons for the lack of public engagement in such issues is broad and varied, but two factors are at play here:1.) the usual fact that most people are too busy holding down a shit job and bringing up a family to have time to notice issues 2.) Most of the media exposure to activism is routinely negative (as the agenda of the media is at odds with people who value human life & dignity over profit or careerism).

So, again, there is more to lose not engaging the public. But there is no real local opinion to follow- as with most activist issues.

You could also be overlooking- at the risk of sounding like Tony Blair- a potential third way. That the divergent camps of anti-authoritarian & other camps could actually agree to work in tandem... I can but dream hahaha!

Personally, I see nothing wrong if people want to be active but not want to be arrested and yes I think your framing of the issue is possibly more constructive/progressive.

If I were local I'd definitely see more sense in going along and contributing, and I think your reservations/suggestions would make you a good addition to the debate yourself.

And of course Smash EDO isn't hierarchical and you can always independently take whatever action.

Ray Milandmine


to sum up the current debate

30.06.2009 17:33

this has been a debate about whether or not having a debate is worth having when its debatable whether or not debating is a waste of time or not.

I propose we now have a further meta-debate about whether or not this comment is valid in the overall debate about the debate or is just some flippant remark that adds nothing

if you consent please put your fingers in the air and make theatrical consensus hand signals and remember to smile nicely.

Thankyou

facilitator


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech