Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Lammas Ecovillage, Wales gets Planning Approval (finally!)

tlio | 27.08.2009 11:48 | Analysis | Ecology | Social Struggles

Today the Lammas ecovillage in Pembrokeshire finally won planning permission for their ecovillage project.

Today the Lammas group won planning permission for their ecovillage project.
Today the Lammas group won planning permission for their ecovillage project.


Lammas is a new settlement of 9 eco-smallholdings, a campsite and a community hub building, to start construction this autumn. It will be sited on 76 acres of mixed pasture and woodland next to the village of Glandwr, Pembrokeshire. The site is on land currently belonging to Pont-y-gafel farm, next to the village of Glandwr, North Pembrokeshire. The site is currently used as farmland.

After their first application was turned down for insufficient detail, Lammas put in an amended application on March 17th 2008. The first application had filled an entire wheelbarrow (the second containuing 150 illustrations and 1200 pages of text would have requuired 2 barrows - so it was submitted electronically!) However, their second application was again turned down in September 2008. Further frustration was experienced when the Welsh Assembly refused them the right to appeal on the grounds that the application was invalid on some technicality. However, appeal they did, and the appeal into the refusal of the revised planning application was heard earlier this summer. The inspector, intrigued and unvonventionally, chose not to allow lamma's expert witnesses to present their full cases in favour, preferring to open the debate about the application to the whole floor so that all voices in favour and against the application were heard. Insptector took a few weeks to reach his decision in considering the whole application.

Despite the launch of a pioneering low-impact policy by Pembrokeshire County Council in 2006 and years of meticulous groundwork, consciencious dedication and patient deliberation, the long exacting process sought for approval of the project has taken over 2 years since the initial application was first submitted. Emphasising the imbalance of the current planning system which doesn't take account of climate change, Paul Wimbush of the Lammas project even suggested that it would have been easier to have applied for planning permission to build a power station! That it has succeeded is due to a tremendous drive to succeed born of an inspirational vision of low impact/low carbon living for the 21st century.

Lammas was conceived as the first large-scale low impact project that would work with the planning system, (ie: to apply for planning permission in advance of the construction and establishment of the project, or in other word, not retrospectively). The Lammas Ecovillage will be completely independent of all mains services. All water will be sourced from the site using a combination of an existing spring for drinking water and rainwater harvesting from rooftops. All electricity will be produced on site using renewables. Fortunately there is an existing water turbine system on site which Lammas plans to renovate. All organic waste will be composted on site using a combination of compost toilets, wormeries and compost heaps. Fuel, in the form of coppiced willow and elephant grass, will be grown on site.

The project will be managed by Lammas Low Impact Initiatives Ltd, a cooperative registered under the Industrial and Provident Society Act. A comprehensive management plan has been compiled which sets out how the project will be established and run.

The smallholdings will essentially be agricultural leaseholds which are conditionally tied to requirements as set out in the management plan. Thus the objectives of the project will be assured in the long term. The requirements will cover issues such as livelihood, transport, services and monitoring.

The people selected for the first phase of the project have developed well researched plans for their livelihoods. In addition to sourcing fuel, water, electricity and food from the site, the 9 households will also run small-scale farm businesses producing a wide range of quality goods including hazelnuts, smoked ham, soft fruit, woodland crafts, vegetables and cooked foods. The produce will be marketed through a variety of outlets including local shops and a Lammas market stall.


Common Land
Some areas of the project will be managed in common. There is an area of existing broadleaf woodland on site which will be conserved for its wildlife value. The existing conifer woodland will be managed and harvested as a resource for building. There will also be shared grazing and fuel crop areas as well as a millpond and village green.

In hindsight
As Larch Maxey has written: "Lammas softly-softly approach, seeking to work with the planning system, has led to huge delays while prospective residents living locally [have poured] savings into inadequate accomodation. Opportunities to harness people's energy have been lost. Whilst it remains invaluable to have the Low-Impact Development movement broadened by projects seeking planning permission before moving on, the planning system is ill equipped for the speed and scale of the challanges we face. Until it is equipped, people must continue to take direct action towards the sustainability transition in every way they can {including} building low impact lives".

More Info:
Ref:  http://www.lammas.org.uk/ecovillage/news.htm

tlio
- Homepage: http://www.tlio.org.uk/chapter7

Comments

Hide the following 14 comments

same ol same ol

27.08.2009 12:29

Exploiting animals just like any other farm. Building (even 'green') on beautiful unspoilt land that was protexcted for a reason. I'm sorry you got this through...

anon


Animal Exploitation - nothing to celebrate

27.08.2009 13:27

So you are all excited that your little animal slave camp is going ahead, well woopy woo.

I'm ashamed off you and for you.

Lynn


well done

27.08.2009 17:26

well done. Ignore the previous posters who are obviously trolls trying to get a rise out of you
people have been farming animals for 1000s of years, it is natural and part of our species evolution.

Max


Sorry max, no

27.08.2009 20:49

"people have been farming animals for 1000s of years, it is natural and part of our species evolution."

You could say the same about slavery.

You don't need to subjugate animals to live sustainably, so why do it?

Welshwoman


why?

27.08.2009 21:59

Because i like to eat dairy products, eggs and meat. I could go hunting and foraging but there is too many people and too little wilderness to do that practically (and its probably against the law)

btw. I couldn't say the same thing about slavery

Max


"too little wilderness"

28.08.2009 07:36

Yes Max. And now there'll be even less.
This group aren't interested in 'the environment' beyond their own personal environment - their own pleasant back yard and a way of making money. If they did, they'd have poured their energies into reclaiming brown sites and learning ways of living that didn't waste valuable land for breeding animals for killing.
They saw Pembrokeshire and the lovely pretected landscape and thought 'I want that for me'.

anon


Extensive agriculture - best use of land

28.08.2009 10:39

anon, yes, a vegan self-sufficient community would be preferable in terms of ecological footprint of course, but would have had even less chance of getting planning approval. The sale of livestock meat products to local market outlets gives the business a greater value-added element to it's sales revenue, so unfortunately rendering it a more credible project for planning approval, and with an extensive-agricultural scale, is more efficient in terms of fertiliser from livestock manure. Green manures in a 100% vegan system need twice the amount of land to replenish fertility in rotation, albeit with more grains harvested and the amount of people fed per sq km many more etc (the grain to meat protein conversion ratio is 8 to 1).

In your livestock-kill-free zone, yr analysis takes no account of the value that livestock make to managing landscapes as well as how their manure is a valuable contribution to soil fertility.

Extensive systems of mixed organic appear to be the best land use system.

See Simon Fairlie's article 'Can Britain feed Itself" in Issues 4 & 5 of The Land Magazine
(copies of articles online by end of September at: www.thelandmagazine.org.uk ).

muscle power


Max

28.08.2009 20:20

"people have been farming animals for 1000s of years, it is natural and part of our species evolution."

The point is the (main) 'defence' for enslaving human animals is the same 'defence' as enslaving non-human animals (not really much suprise there - as its still animal slavery after all). This is mainly because humans have been enslaved for longer than non-humans.

The further point is that historic 'tradition' doesn't justify the present, re; sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, genocide, hierarchy, etc.

Before saying animal slavery doesn't exist, look up human (animal) slavery first, as what you would be trying to say is non-human slavery doesn't exist.

veg@n


English plantation

29.08.2009 14:39


We've seen plenty of English plantations in Wales over the centuries and now we have a new type - selfish gits - couldn't they have found an area outside y fro Gymraeg.

Glanmor


veg@n

29.08.2009 18:08

Im struggling with your point sorry. i think your point is that slavery of humans and slavery of animals is the same thing and the denial of one is to deny the other?

To clarfiy, i think slavery of humans is bad. But i think "slavery" (ie. in a farm) of animals is fine.
The reason being, i consider them different things

Slavery of humans has probably died to the extent it has today because a) slaves have fought back, b) most people find it abhorrent. The same cant be said for keeping animals on farms. I'm sure a chicken / pig / cow doesn't want to be eaten by me, but basically they don't have a choice in the matter. Its the same in nature - a zebra doesn't want to get eaten by a lion, a mouse doesn't want to get eaten by a cat, and a human certainly doesn't want to get eaten by a shark. But in all cases, the victim doesn't really have a say in the matter. Such is life.

Max


Max

30.08.2009 04:09

"Slavery of humans has probably died to the extent it has today because a) slaves have fought back, b) most people find it abhorrent. The same cant be said for keeping animals on farms."

The same can't be said for non-human animals? Not true. In response to your statements:

a) I could explain many examples, but this video probably evidences this a lot better:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA_d4CPYTB0

b) Most people do find the slavery of animals as adhorrent. For example bullfighting and cockfighting most people oppose, as well as circuses, puppy farming and greyhound racing to name a few other examples. It's true to say that humans don't generally find all non-human slavery adhorrent (such as meat/diary farming, egg production and so on), but the same is true for human animals (such as wage slavery, third world exploitation and so on).

Clearly people oppose human slavery more than non-human slavery, but this isn't further justification for either existing. Most people also oppose homophobia more than transphobia, racism more than sexism for example, but the latter is no more justified than the former.

In summary, your statements are unfounded. No non-humans are not pacified and no people considering something as acceptable doesn't make it so. History has always been made by the minority, not the majority. Ignore the common belief, it's better to listen to the minority.

"I'm sure a chicken / pig / cow doesn't want to be eaten by me, but basically they don't have a choice in the matter."

I'm sure people with disabilities don't want to be further disabled for example, but sometimes they don't have a choice in the matter because they are physically/mentally unable to fight back against oppressors. Does this really justify their abuse by other human beings?

"Its the same in nature - a zebra doesn't want to get eaten by a lion, a mouse doesn't want to get eaten by a cat, and a human certainly doesn't want to get eaten by a shark. But in all cases, the victim doesn't really have a say in the matter. Such is life."

This a really stomach churning thought, particularly the last line. Does this go victims of rape, paedophilia, child abuse and so on? As you said, it's life afterall. I however disagree.

As humans, we have the ability to sympathise with victims and therefore should help to protect them. Just because other animals serial kill, rape each other and are territorial, because they don't act as moral agents, doesn't mean we should do so also. If this was the case then we'd also support human patriarchy, genocide and war as a normal part of nature.

What I'm trying to say is don't use blood-thursty non-humans species as justification, you end up justifying more than you wish for, a lot more.

veg@n


veg@n

30.08.2009 12:57

Thanks for your comments. I feel your examples of on the extreme side of the scale.
The video does show animals fighting back. Sometimes they win, sometimes they dont.

I do find cock-fighting, circuses, and bullfighting all bad. But that doesn't mean I find farms and animals breed for food sickening. So i would say there are degrees (much like anything in life). However, MOST people are unlikely to be against farms for the reason that most people eat meat (i may be wrong on this, but you get my drift) and most people don't seem to be against farms.

my "such is life" point wasn't meant to cover rape or people with disabilities. Its context was based around the idea that animals eat other animals - nothing more. Is it morally wrong that a Lion eats a Zebra.... i don't believe so. But for humans to eat or (rape other humans)? Yes, it is wrong........ but only in terms of my moral opinion. Most people share this 2nd point otherwise we woudn't have reached this level of civilisation quite yet.

>> As humans, we have the ability to sympathise with victims and therefore should help to protect them. Just because other animals serial kill, rape each other and are territorial, because they don't act as moral agents, doesn't mean we should do so also.......

I understand where you are coming from and it is difficult to argue against. But, i would say, morals are a personal opinion of an individual. Ultimately, there is no need to justify doing anything except to oneself.

As an example, there are a group of people out there who believe that we should only eat fruit that has fallen from trees,... to do otherwise is stealing and hurting the tree. These are their opinions and morals and they could argue on the same basis as yourself. Yet we (in the most part) do not have a problem with growing food and harvesting it. We don't have to justify doing it because we already accept it in our own moral standpoint.

Each person to their own. But, that doesn't mean you should stop trying to educate and convince other people of what you believe in. Some people would have an issue with this, but I certainly don't. In the long run, I actually think your thinking will become the norm. I do actually think the percentage of people with your moral stance will increase in each generation.

Max


Max

30.08.2009 16:46

"Thanks for your comments. I feel your examples of on the extreme side of the scale."

The idea afterall is to be a creative extremist to change the world :-)

"But for humans to eat or (rape other humans)? Yes, it is wrong........ but only in terms of my moral opinion."

Why is it that only against your own species it's wrong? Favouring your own species is a blatant act of speciesism. Yes non-humans murder and rape each other, but we shouldn't, whether it is against our own species or another.

"But, i would say, morals are a personal opinion of an individual."

Indeed, some people are racist, sexist, homopboic, transphobic, xenophobic, etc. What is to note is each persons morals comes with responsibility. Look at what happened to the Nazis.

"As an example, there are a group of people out there who believe that we should only eat fruit that has fallen from trees,... to do otherwise is stealing and hurting the tree. These are their opinions and morals and they could argue on the same basis as yourself."

Not so. Firstly, it's not stealing as you can only steal what is property. It is not property as it has no monetary value. Secondly, it's not hurting a tree, as they have no central nervous system to feel the pain that animals do. It may indeed harm that tree (as does breaking a branch, or cutting down a tree, which I disagree with), but the tree cannot feel this harm. I do believe we should minimise our negative impact on the Earth and its ecosphere, but collecting food is a basic must to survive, and we should do so causing no felt harm. Fortunately our negative impact (walking, eating, etc) is weighed out by our positive impact (if we act upon it), such as planting seeds, feeding other species etc.

"...I actually think your thinking will become the norm. I do actually think the percentage of people with your moral stance will increase in each generation."

Cheers. It's nice to know that at least some people listen on here!

veg@n


English plantation and non-brownfield site

02.12.2009 19:50


Hi,

As an English person living in Wales and planning to make it my home for the rest of my life because I love it so much, I am saddened to read the comment by Glanmor. I can understand if these people weren't wanting to engage with the wider community life but it seems that they are.

My partner and I intend do something similar in the near future. We would like some of our Welsh friends or people we haven't yet met to join us, but if no Welsh person wants to, and everyone who does happens to be English- what are we supposed to do? We intend to learn welsh and are proud of the fact that our young daughter will grow up here. We love Wales, not England. That's why we're here. When Lammas asked for people to get involved in their project, I have no doubt that they would have been delighted if some locals stepped up, or any welsh person. Plus- how do we know the original nationality of everyone living there?

As for Lammas not choosing a brownfield site, in my mind there are a couple of points to consider there:

1) As the recent study from Lammas shows (to be found on their website) the project will actually be improving the land from the state that it's in now. Although much of our agricultural landscape *looks* pretty, in terms of ecology it might as well be a green desert. Lammas are going to be applying Permaculture principles to make the land better than when they found it.

2) A lot of brownfield sites in towns and cities have reverted to shrub land and are a desperately needed haven for wildlife. I agree that conventional buildings should not be built on green belt and on brown field sites, but actually to lose some of this urban wilderness would be disastrous for local wildlife. More shold be done to create and preserve 'wildlife corridors'.

I don't think that these people are selfish. They are putting a hell of a lot of work into doing something that will benefit us all- whether we are English or Welsh.

Katy


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech