Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Confronting censorship in prison

John Bowden, HMP Glenochil | 20.10.2009 21:46 | Analysis | Other Press | Repression

The suppression of political literature and material considered ‘subversive’ is a long-established habit on the part of prison administrations who view the spread and dissemination of radical ideas amongst prisoners as a real threat to the authority of prison staff and the system they enforce.

Preventing the circulation of material critical of the prison system and denying prisoners the right to publically air matters of legitimate public interest (ie the treatment of citizens in state custody) tends also to be considered by prison managers an important and necessary component of a system of absolute control. Secrecy and concealment remain important tools in the disempowerment and isolation of prisoners.


Fortunately, the development of prison-based litigation and the access won by prisoners to human rights law has progressively weakened the power of prison management to hinder and obstruct information accessed by prisoners and the right of prisoners to publically voice their criticism of the prison system. Under current European human rights legislation, in particular Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, (freedom of expression) prison managers who impose blanket bans on radical political literature and the dissemination of material critical of the prison system are now acting unlawfully and can be held legally accountable for their actions.


Unfortunately, some prison governors continue to exhibit a contempt for the law in this regard and almost wilfully continue to behave in a way reminiscent of a time when their power over prisoners was absolute and prisoners existed in a vacuum devoid of any legal and civil rights and protections whatsoever.



Earlier this year I wrote and distributed an article critical of prison ‘Close Supervision Centres’ (control units) and a Prison Service policy document called ‘Managing Challenging Behaviour Strategy’. In the article I accused the Prison Service of institutionalising a system of repression that breached the human rights of prisoners. The article was published by the prison newspaper Inside Time and the radical political newspaper Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism! (FRFI). Although no attempt was made by prison managers to prevent the distribution of the issue of Inside Time that contained my article, a blanket ban on FRFI was imposed by the governors of Woodhill and Wakefield prisons, both locations of Close Supervision Centres. Following complaints by prisoner subscribers to FRFI at Woodhill and Wakefield, Larkin Publications, who publish and distribute FRFI, wrote to the governors at both jails seeking an explanation for the ban. in her response, the governor of Wakefield jail openly admitted to imposing a blanket ban on FRFI with the jail (in clear breach of the ECHR) and tried to justify her action by claiming that my article about the Close Supervision Centres was 'inaccurate and misleading'. Legal case law has established that interference with ECHR rights in the matter of free expression must only be done with minimum interference proportionate with achieving a legitimate aim, and clearly preventing the dissemination of an article critical of the prison system that a jail governor happens not to agree with is not a legitimate aim. Apart from being unlawful the governor's decision was also irrational because she allowed the free distribution of Inside Time at Wakefield and within it the distribution of my article also.



The really critical issue here is that some jail managers continue to show a blatant disregard for human rights law by delegating to themselves the authority to dictate what prisoners are allowed to read and express politically.



In terms of my article itself, whether it likes it or not, the Prison Service must acknowledge there are serious concerns about its current management strategy in relation to 'difficult' prisoners and these concerns have a legitimacy and right to be openly voiced and expressed. My article drew most of its information from the Prison Service's own policy document 'Managing Challenging Behaviour Strategy' and if my interpretation of that document was 'inaccurate and misleading' then the Prison Service could and should have used the medium of, say, Inside Time, to correct that interpretation and answer some of the concerns raised in the article. instead, the banning of FRFI at Woodhill and Wakefield on the basis that it carried the offending article suggests there is an indefensibility about the treatment of 'unmanageable prisoners in the 'Close Supervision Centre system and a prevailing mentality within the Prison Service that is contemptuous of the basic human right of free expression.








[NB - the governors of Wakefield and Woodhill appear to have backed down in the face of complaints and threatened legal action, but this kind of censorship of political material recurs endlessly and needs to be confronted repeatedly.]

John Bowden, HMP Glenochil

Comments

Display the following 2 comments

  1. Good article — cpp
  2. witholding mail — withholding mail
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech