A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.
www.indymedia.org
Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Africa
Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela
Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney
South Asia
india
United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester
West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
Comments
Hide the following 25 comments
Clueless and dangerous
21.03.2010 12:07
If you going to "alert British society to the rising threat of the BNP" get on with the fucking job.Edl are nothing to do with electoralism of the far right. Meanwhile down the street the bnp carry on unmolested.
Clueless and dangerous, the uaf are a greater threat to anti-fascism than the edl will ever be.
afa
Excellent
21.03.2010 16:09
Bonzo
stand strong stand proud
21.03.2010 16:51
The cops, the media, councils, and the state can not be relied on to opposse fascists. We need to mobilise everytime they rear their heads. Forget the sectarianism. I have many issues with UAF too. But when it comes down to a fascist street army marching through our town we must stand strong, and stand together we all who are there on the street. Because of the turnout yesterday we managed to prevent another EDL rampage like we saw in Stoke.
bolton wanderer
Clueless dangerous blind and stupid.
21.03.2010 17:49
The fascists you speak of (the BNP) have for the past 12 years avoided confrontation, street politics and far-right rabble rousing. And will continue to avoid 'street politics'
The facsists you speak of (the BNP) have be steadily gaining votes, growing in support, membership and credibility throughout the country. Mainly from disillusioned working class ex-labour voters.
What the edl have got to do with fascism (political fascism, not student insult fascism) only exists in the infantile minds of the uaf leadership who are happy and willing to encourgae students and young muslim lads to take a battering on their behalf in the name of 'anti-fascism'.
Uaf is the state. New labour, government lackeys. Jesus, even when it is right in front of you, you can't see it.
AFA
yes fight the bnp... but don't ignore the edl.
21.03.2010 18:46
http://libcom.org/news/edl-stoke-23012010
I agree we need to organise against the BNP, but it's not a question of one or the other. The EDl must be oppossed for the reasons given in the link. The alternative is to allow them control of our streets, and to allow them to attack with violence our communities. Just like they did in Stoke.
What were you doing to opposse the BNP electorally in Bolton? That requires hard work and building community campaigns which put forward libertarian alternatives. Mobilising against fascist street armies like the edl is part of that struggle.
bolton wanderer
Stupidity Disguised as 'Anti-Fascism'
21.03.2010 18:59
It appears that BNP's success is making the UAF run around chasing it's arse because it has run out of ideas.
John Clarke
Reet,me&6others were charged@by60+BNPsupporters in Kirkby ashfield about 6 yrs
21.03.2010 19:07
We need to confront them both in a well disciplined way & not attack unless they attack us, the EDL are Knights of the Holy Pisshead Pubcrawl,
the BNP are nazis who need serious professional therapy.
My family fought their way out of Germany & eastern europe in the 1930's, I went after the NF& BNP in the 1990s& I believed fighting the BNP on the streets was the only way.Times have changed now many antifash disagree with BNP doing the political thing, whilst their doing that if we attack physically them their likely to capitalise.
We all know the EDL & BNP are the real thugs & bullies so let them attack us & lets defend ourselves really well, in a disciplined way & let the police arrest them not us.
Charging in ourselves in a unorganised way,gets alot of our side arrested for not good reason.Screaming vague chants , chanting whose streets or our streets dont go down well with many people either.
We have to v smart& use smart&cunning NVDA tactics if they attack us defend ourselves with controlled force.
Seems more ex AFA are interested in coming, back, they are older & wiser now, they arent thugs, if we act lik thugs we will put off the public& our key supporters as well give the BNP & some in the corporate media what they want.
Intergalactic Brigade
it's not one OR the other...
21.03.2010 19:12
If you ignore the EDL they will go on the rampage through our towns and cities. I'm sorry but I'm not prepared to let that happen where I live.
bolton wanderer
Bolton Wanderer
21.03.2010 19:29
John Clarke
in my town
21.03.2010 20:22
bolton wanderer
EDL = BNP (but ignored the bnp) even this close to a general election
21.03.2010 21:51
But confronting the edl is NOT anti-fascism no matter how much the uaf leadership (and their string pullers) demand it is.
And while lefties get all distracted by the edl (who are designated fascist BECAUSE of their relationship to the bnp) the bnp continue their election campaign, ignored by all.
It's absolutely fucking surreal.
AFA
Opposing the EDL and the BNP
21.03.2010 22:03
Either way, when the EDL started out I was unsure how to react. Very soon afterwards the EDL came to my exact area. The EDL brought known BNP activists with them. They were literally sent packing by local residents. A few days later BNP teams leafletted the exact streets where I and (though I'm white) my elderly Asian in-laws live (again the BNP got a rough ride from local residents to put it mildly). If that's STILL not proof enough for you, EDL co-founder Paul Ray has now admitted BNP activist Chris Renton is "de-facto Commander of the EDL". Next....
Not John Clarke
AFA / John Clarke
22.03.2010 00:21
The MANY people we SPOKE to before, during and after the Harrow protest confirmed that white and non-white Anti-Fascists are as diverse in their politics as they are in their religion (or lack of it) and ethnicity. At that time it was already common-knowledge that the EDL is littered with BNP supporters, so their opponents included Jewish and Hindu Tory councillors, virtually every Rabbi in North West London, Sikh leftists, white Muslims, Turkish socialists, Labour, Green Party and Trades Union activists (of various ethnicities), a small contingent of conspicuous Antifa (NAME REMOVED and a few pals), veterans of predominantly Asian left / anti-racist groups like Southall Black Sisters, Women Against Fundamentalism, the Indian Workers Association and Southall Monitoring Group, a couple of local SHARPs (by which I mean local lads who actually go out wearing SHARP patches), all the usual left-wing micro-species, Afro-Caribbean hoodies who made no secret they'd come to physically attack the BNP, to Somali school-kids and local interfaith people from every conceivable brand of fluffy liberalism. The vast majority of this lot were most definitely and categorically Anti-Fascist (irrespective of what the UAF leadership might or might not say).
Unfortunately there were some right-wing Muslims opposing the EDL and SIOE too, but in fact the Islamo-Fascist group Hizb-ut Tahrir told their supporters to stay AWAY from the Harrow counter-protests, Harrow Mosque welcomes significant Barelvi (anti-Taliban), Ismaili and Sufi (pacifist) congregations, and the Harrow-based Muslim Times wrote an article which condemned Hizb-ut Tahrir and similar groups as religious cults, comparing them to terrorists like The Minutemen and the IRA.
Not John Clarke
Not neo-Nazis My Fookin' Arse!!!!!!
22.03.2010 00:44
The EDL's "LTE" - Love Combat 18, the NF and the BNP.
Those EDL thugs who violently attacked anti-racist campaigners on the edge of town on late Saturday afternoon were members of the British Freedom Fighters, whom Wigan Mike and Liam Pinkham recently revealed the EDL go as far as ringing them both up and asking them to attend EDL rallies.
There are most definately hardcore neo-Nazis attending EDL rallies.
Fuck off back to Stornfront, fash-loving troll scum.
You will not divide and conquer, giving the EDL fascists a free reign to go on a Krystallnacht like riot as they did in Stoke, led by Jeff (The Fuckin' Nazi) Marsh.
If that was not nazi activity, what the fuck is???????
Jiff Lemon
@ Not John Clarke
22.03.2010 10:37
As a form of self defence fair play - they felt their religion was being threatened, they pulled out a couple of thousand people to make sure it wasn't.
EDL is a single issue campaign, made up mainly of ex-army and football hoolies - and a lot of wannabes, of course it will attract elements of the far right, not only because of the message it is sending out, but because it gives an opportunity for individuals from the far right (not the bnp who are busy canvassing in their local community about immigration) to feel and be part of a genuine street based movement.
The far right in the edl are kept in check (see C18 getting a pasting from the edl in london) and are almost certainly using it as means of building thier own confidence and maybe recruit a few mugs.
It was uaf who drew the dividing line and are now paying the price.
AFA
@ AFA
22.03.2010 11:37
giuseppe pinelli
How it should have gone
22.03.2010 12:56
1. we take edl at their word that they are not a racist/facsist organisation
2. we accept they are not a racist/fascist organisation and would will not be confronted because of it
3. we will confront on the day the far right/fascists/racists/nazis, whether they are involved in the edl or not.
4. we will confront anybody attacking us, "asian shopkeepers", etc (this is called self-defence)
5. our issue is not with the edl, our issue is with the facsists/racists/nazis
6. our job is to tackle fascists/racists/nazis
7. we make a tacit agreement with the edl on that score. This isolates the fascists within the edl ranks
8. we also recognise that if edl come out (ie they say they are) as been a racist organisation they will be confronted as such.
The 'we' in this scenario are militant anti-facists NOT the uaf, student wankers. lefty politicos or keyboard warriors.
This should have happened at Birmingham when there was less than 50 on the demo and they were bending over backwards for recognition/approval/acceptance that they were not a racist organisation.
Bradford's too late. mate. Manchester was too late. Uaf fucked it for all genuine anti-fascists and there's no way we can claw any ground back.
AFA
@ giuseppe pinelli
22.03.2010 13:11
You get a crew of about fifty, minimum. You put a statement out beforehand that you are militant anti-facsists, you are not intereted in the edl, they can have they demo, go about their business, you're looking for fascists. You say: Anybody we identity as fascists they will be confronted (regardless of whether they are with the edl or not). You say: any racists attacks will be dealt with. You say: we take the edl at their word that they are not a violent facsist/racist organisation and won't be confronted on that score. You say: we will act in self-defence if attacked.
You hit identifiable facsists, and you hit them hard. You leave the edl demo alone.
Of course all fifty would have to be up for it, and you will have to have decent politics and bollocks to pull it off.
AFA
there not nazis
22.03.2010 13:56
neutral
EDL
22.03.2010 14:01
If things ever got violent, I like to say that as the majority of them look like scaffholders most of us wouldn't last long!
from going to a lot the "antifascist demos" I'd say a lot of the middleclass lefties absolutely hate the white working class, its embarressing to hear them sterotype them/us as all as hairy apes who drink stella.
and who was that idiot outside the house of lords with the big red flag with "For Bolshevism" written on it? "Yes, we're all Bolsheviks who hate this country!"
what a twat.
And the SWP also piss me off, ruining every demo in the country.
The EDL/Casuals United love to sterotype the "antifascists" as middleclass "Tarquin" communist students who hate this country and are full of guilt, and are too scared to critize the problems with radical islam.
you could argue even if they don't agree with us at least they are out on the streets protesting...why not try to talk with them and avoid a confrontation?
jo blogs
Yes of course we should still oppose the EDL
22.03.2010 15:01
At the time of the Harrow protest EDL's SIOE colleagues swore they weren't pro-BNP, everyone smelled a rat anyway, and, whaddya know, the hunch turned out to be 100% accurate because after the protest SIOE posted pro-BNP graphics on the SIOE England Facebook. Anyway, we were standing right next to the Antifa group for quite a while during this protest - you guys stood out like a sore thumb, and I was about to say thanks for showing up anyway but your comment about "student wankers" prove your opinions are just as prejudiced as the arguments I hear from the BNP.
Not John Clarke
Sound analysis comrade
22.03.2010 15:21
Tactical Suggestion
good points
22.03.2010 16:22
giuseppe pinelli
@Not John Clarke
23.03.2010 13:35
1. yes i am implying most of the non-white participants were muslim. This is not a criticism nor an judgment. A mosque is being targetted by a group opposed to islamic extremism. Apart from the islam-obsessed swp what motivates people who are non-muslim to attend? For us it was a scouting mission on the edl i.e an anti-fascist activity NOT a pro-muslim "defend the mosque" activity.
2. The demo was in the overwhelming majority young asian lads, that much is beyond dispute. I'd be seriously interested to know how many sikhs were present, and it what capacity. Also interested to know how you sold the event (and on whose behalf) when you went round the area.
3. of course we stood out like a sore thumbs - the only white working class lads on the demo.
4. i have nothing but respect for the way the muslim lads defended their mosque on the day. I'd question why a sikh lad would go and defend a mosque?
5. how to deal with the edl. Recognise first WHO you are dealing with. Recognise ex-army and retired hoolies with reactionay views are not by definition fascist. Recognise most of the edl are white working class. Recognise edl is a single issue campaign. Isolate the explicit far right elements with that. Concentrate on seperating out the far right elements (as opposed to the simply reactionary) and dealing with them. This is an anti-fascist strategy, not a 'protect the muslims' strategy.
6. Calling everyone in the edl "NAZI BNP" (and to be fair its the uaf students and keyboard warriors who are doing this) is not a strategy.
AFA
don't jump to assumptions
23.03.2010 14:38
another sikh in harrow