Radioactive Waste - In a Landfill Near You ?
Marianne Birkby | 09.04.2010 18:04 | Analysis | Climate Chaos | Energy Crisis | World
....the nuclear industry is busy trashing the environment and filling landfill up with radioactive waste.
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle - Make Room for Nuclear ?!
rate of 26000m3 a year.
Radiation Free Lakeland say : the nuclear industry is sticking two fingers up to Cumbria - while masquerading as "green" - there is an unfathomable void between nuclear power and the truth.
The Keekle Head planning meeting is scheduled to take place on 25th May in Kendal. This is a widely opposed proposal - even the pronuclear MP Jamie Reed has opposed the plan. Radiation Free Lakeland will speak in opposition. GDF Suez Watch are also opposing.
BUT Lillyhall is already being polluted with Radwaste unbeknown to anyone it seems including the Council officers in charge of the license.
RAFL enquired if the Lillyhall application to recieve Radwaste was to be heard at the same time as Keekle Head ..
- what was revealed is astounding and beyond satire-
according to the County Council and Copeland officials under "present conditions" the operators of Lillyhall landfill site can bring in as much High Volume Very Low Level Radioactive Waste as they like.
They have "no need" to apply for permission to do this- the "present conditions" run out in 2014. We have had sight of the conditions of the Lillyhall license (below) and there is no mention of radioactive waste in any shape or form.
"Very Low Level Rad Waste" is a new classification - made to enable radioactive waste to be put into ordinary landfill. No other individual or company could get away with polluting in this way. In fact the laws applying to everyone apart from the nuclear industry have been tightened
up "From July 2004, 'non-hazardous' sites have been only allowed to accept non-hazardous waste. The Directive has banned whole tyres from landfill since 2003, with this ban extending to shredded tyres from July 2006, while liquid wastes have been banned from landfill since October 2007. The Directive also brings with it tighter site monitoring and engineering standards. This is supplemented by the new European Waste Catalogue, which has extended the range of materials classified as 'hazardous', and the Waste Acceptance Criteria, which has introduced stringent pre-treatment requirements".
At the last council meeting the councillors were horrified that ordinary landfill could be used for radwaste and voted to oppose it - .....but according to the council official Radiation Free Lakeland spoke to yesterday -"the Waste Recycling Group and Energy solutions who run
Lillyhall do not 'need' planning permissions.
The site is not monitered unless there are complaints - then there is one man - the council's monitering officer who would go and have a peek- so no one would be any the wiser as to exactly how radioactive/dangerous the waste is.
This document from Magnox North outlines the industry's wish list - which Goverment departments are falling over themselves to provide at the expense of our safety...
"magnox north has a need to dispose of solid waste .....normally disposed by transfer to the LLWR (Drigg) .....LLWR has refused to accept the waste. It is now proposed to dispose of this waste to a specified landfill site"
it goes on
"This can take up to 4 months from the date of recieving the application ......there is usually another 28 days before you can start accumulating and disposing of radioactive waste"
according to the council this is happening now at Lillyhall - there is no monitoring and there is "no need" for planning procedures - they can "take as much as they want"
Document from Chapelcross Magnox North
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:B7lJN8DdWuUJ:www.sepa.org.uk/about_us/consultations/idoc.ashx%3Fdocid%3D9824bc77-c263-46eb-a25d-926703895f9e%26version%3D-1+lillyhall+chapelcross+magnox+sepa&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShJtfGYeEHaoxkkwH7FvFPwLKynNqax2GLhPS-1QHDRPP4Lm-o1-GUMyBgM8DYkmkJY0Fx2nCFQ4R-vdGzqh9qtvu6MhsvcaYy-xdUOXXoaoQiHZNXwbxf_fKlVr9cgDiQ_F5Jv&sig=AHIEtbTKxGZCMbzBc8X5K8_5f-a82h291g
Hazardous Waste and Landfill (for all except the nuclear industry)
http://www.letsrecycle.com/legislation/landfill/
"Present Conditions" for Lillyhall - the report and the minutes from the meeting
held on 27 May 2004 say nothing about radioactive waste!
Report
http://www.cumbria.gov.uk/CouncilMeetings/Content/Public/2976/3812711341
9.pdf
Minutes
http://www.cumbria.gov.uk/CouncilMeetings/Content/Public/2976/381829370.
Marianne Birkby
e-mail:
rafl@mariannebirkby.plus.com
Homepage:
http://web.mac.com/mariannebirkby1/iWeb/Radiation%20Free%20Lakeland/Radiation%20Free%20Lakeland.html
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
Nuclear is safe.
10.04.2010 14:19
Nobody was killed at Three Mile Island. Sellafield has caused fewer deaths than the old coal mines in Cumbria - by a long, long way indeed.
I'm sure windmills and solar panels would cause even fewer deaths if you don't count deaths from hypothermia when not enough powwer was being produced.
Nuclear power is safe and has a fantastic safety record. Only the communist soviet regime has blotted its copybook and they were hopeless at most things.
By the way, arguing against nuclear power in Cumbria is a non-starter. It provides too many jobs. Not everyone can ush pens at the local councils - nearly everyone does in nice middle class Kendal but people in other places need real jobs.
Pete
Deaths in Uranium Mines/Radiation Linked Diseases
10.04.2010 22:46
http://www.wise-uranium.org/umop.html
Yes the nuclear industry provides jobs - but net loss of jobs is greater - Seascale was a thriving victorian tourist resort - Ravenglass held fish fairs on the beach - farmers cannot sell their livestock .....
The nuclear industry itself runs a Compensation Scheme for Radiation Linked Diseases
Here is a poem by a Sellafield forman called Duncan Ball who died last year aged 49 before being 'compensated'
Ticking boxes.
The boxes are ticked by those men who’ve been picked, from the keenest of yes men there, for checks done each day so the bosses can say, that their workforce takes extra care.
But the bosses were tricked by some men that they picked for a job that all liars can do composing old fiction that begs a
conviction for writing what still isn’t true.
But on they run with boxes ticked, while welding’s cracked and something’s dripped, inside the cell where Foremen looked: for hours on end in ‘Logs and books recording all the names of crooks who wouldn’t see and didn’t look, behind those windows two foot thick, where fell a steady drip of ticks.
Soon crystals formed as crystals do, from tiny holes where pressure grew, a mist of droplets spewing out, a sight that should have brought a shout from foremen ticking thrice each day when signing names for easy pay: the country paying bigger lumps to lazy men for growing dumps.
Some columns formed with lost control, as Foremen ticked and shirkers stole five minutes here then hours there forsaking safety's measured stare for extra tea and flashy things, that overtime some boxes bring with elements whose mass can change the genes of everything in range.
Trapped outside their ticking box where spillage flows like molten rocks with dangers left to grow unseen until one idle Chargehand's scream said “Shut it down and do it quick before we’re all in deepest shit there’s been another situation, critical to every nation.”
Marianne Birkby
e-mail: rafl@mariannebirkby.plus.com
Dreamland
11.04.2010 19:54
Conjecture.
Seascale might well have been a thriving resort in Victorian times, but I doubt nuclear power has stopped it becoming a second Blackpool. Windscale was built where it was precisely because it is relatively remote and nobody really wants to go there. If it didn't exist now that area of Cumbria would depopulate quite quickly.
Local support for the nuclear plant is very high. There is absolutely no doubt about that.
Pete
Local support for new build is wildly misrepresented
11.04.2010 23:58
marianne Birkby
e-mail: wildart@mariannebirkby.plus.com
Its a job .....
12.04.2010 00:08
* ICRPreports ICRP27/ICRP60.
marianne Birkby
e-mail: wildart@mariannebirkby.plus.com