Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Social movement defensive battles The need to engage with politics

Luke Sinwell | 22.04.2010 12:26 | Analysis | Social Struggles

In the South African political landscape there are some feisty social movements that have waged some hard struggles such as Abahlali base Mjondolo. However, the Left needs to be careful not to over-romanticise their contribution to a more democratic South Africa.

In the South African political landscape there are some feisty social movements that have waged some hard struggles such as Abahlali base Mjondolo. However, the Left needs to be careful not to over-romanticise their contribution to a more democratic South Africa.

On 4 November 2009, the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the University of Johannesburg and Rhodes University hosted a provocative seminar called “Democracy under threat?: What attacks on grassroots activists mean for our politics” to reflect on and debate the recent attacks on Abahlali BaseMjondolo at Kennedy Road.

The seminar brought together grassroots activists from Abahlali, scholars and human rights advocates to discuss threats to free political activity and their implications. Given the state’s violent assault on grassroots organisers who have challenged aspects of the ANC’s development plans in poor communities, the main concern was understandably to build solidarity to support Abahlali.

During the seminar, it was suggested that a network be created between various progressive stakeholders across the country which would attempt to challenge the repressive arm of the state. A unanimous resolution was passed to pressure the State President to conduct an independent enquiry into the attacks on shack dwellers in Durban.

But an analysis of the discussion at this seminar, and of the politics surrounding the recent events at Kennedy Road and other protest activity around the country, must also take another form. Analysis is needed in order to understand the potential for movements to provide an alternative to the ANC and its neoliberal economic policies.

Are defensive battles enough?
It is certainly important for community organisations to be free to express themselves and to associate without fear of state repression. But there is also the danger that focusing solely on repression and police brutality arouses emotions, thereby blurring our vision and hiding the nature of the movements themselves. This induces romantic accounts of the kind of society or democracy these movements could build if they were not repressed.

Indeed, the Left’s depiction of social movements in post-apartheid South Africa has tended to be superficial, labeling the poor’s voice as a virtuous one that needs no outside political strategy – as is the case with Abahlali. Alternatively, the Left has tended to assume that movements like the Anti-Privatisation Forum (APF) automatically challenge neoliberalism, simply because the face of the forum’s leadership is anti-neoliberal. Analysts have not gone so far as to analyse the internal dynamics of local affiliates of the APF which, in some instances, actually buy into ANC policies.

These approaches have meant that the Left has ignored the potential for movements to challenge the ideologically dominant ANC. From this perspective, academic leftists and other research-activists critique the policies and often even the ideology of the ANC in power, but the masses are left to their own devices.

With this in mind, we must attempt to soberly uncover the politics of Abahlali and other movements.

One of the most celebrated movements in post-apartheid South Africa, Abahlali is often described as an ideal example of a bottom-up community-based organisation that genuinely represents the interests of the poor. It claims to be able to speak for itself and on behalf of poor people living in shacks. At the seminar, S’bu Zikode, chairperson of Abahlali, declared that, “grassroots intelligence independently can provide their own political direction, they know what they want.” This is contrasted with the top-down and repressive ANC government that serves its own interests.

Similarly, for Mnikelo Ndabankulu, the spokesperson of Abahlali, the recent attacks reveal that, “For the ANC, Abahlali is a threat to their gravy train more than political parties. We are concerned about the people whereas they are concerned about seats in parliament. The ANC is upset because their job becomes to sit quietly… It (ANC) can no longer be paid to think for poor/shack dwellers because Abahlali can speak for itself.”

Echoing a common phrase evoked by Abahlali, one of the members declared that, “no one should think for us, without us”.

Referring to the apartheid-style of attacks in Kennedy Road, Ndabankulu compared Abahlali to the United Democratic Front (UDF), the liberation movement which was attacked during apartheid because it was a threat to the state. He even went so far as to suggest that, “The mere fact that we are being attacked, means that we are heading in the right direction.”

But, we must take a close look at the politics of Abahlali itself if we are to understand where Abahlali could be taking the South African democracy. And then Abahlali actually appears quite conservative in its politics.

Obtaining low-cost RDP houses and struggling to demand in situ (where they live) upgrading, as Abahlali has done through the courts, cannot on its own challenge whether or not Kennedy Road will remain a slum. Instead, in situ upgrading essentially earns the right for the poor to remain in shacks and upgrade them.

While defensive battles are clearly welcome and necessary, the demand to think, speak and act on behalf of oneself does not necessarily challenge the neoliberal status quo.

ANC ability to co-opt
Drawing lessons from the history of recent militant communities provides critical insight into Abahlali and other militant community organisations which have challenged government decisions in post-apartheid South Africa. While at face value there have been important challenges to neoliberal orthodoxy, many movements die out at the faintest sign of a state concession – and this where the power of the ANC, and indeed token welfare neoliberalism, lies.

The case in Khutsong (township on West Rand) throws this into sharp relief.

Khutsong was one of the most militant communities in the post-apartheid period particularly between 2005 and 2006. It refused to vote in the 2006 elections and achieved its demand of being incorporated into the Gauteng province and is now, as one leader celebrates, “100% ANC”.

Winning this kind of concession is in important in its own terms for the lives of poor people in Khutsong and, indeed, for our faith in the power of human beings to resist the implementation of top-down development plans. But it must not be viewed as a sign that the neoliberal onslaught is under threat or that real resistance to neoliberalism is mounting.

Like the recent service delivery protests in Balfour, Piet Retief, and Standerton, Abahlali does not challenge the ANC’s national policy framework. The danger is that we describe these movements as revolutionary or liberatory when in fact they buy into the ANC and, to a certain extent, legitimise it.

We must honestly deal with the contradictions that movements are faced with and ask ourselves: what kind of liberation movement legitimises the same government that represses them, by voting them into power?

Despite the position of the leadership of Abahlali, the majority of the people in Kennedy Road vote the ANC into power. Even Abahlali’s slogan,“No House, No Vote“, as militant as it may be, suggests, like the case of Khutsong (and maybe also Balfour), that if the ANC arrives with its state concessions, often a few poorly constructed RDP houses and toilets, residents will then vote for the ANC. This means little for the enemy, neoliberalism, that so much of the Left claims to be fighting against.

Romanticisation of social movements only takes us so far if we seriously seek to understand whether the strategies and tactics employed by movements have the potential to challenge state power.

Need to critically engage
We must also confront the desire among the Left to depict the weak and vulnerable, the poor shacks dwellers, as those who have all the answers, as pure subjects. If true democracy is to be not only for the middle class minority, but also for the poor majority, Abahlali and other movements will have to do more than just speak up and participate. Indeed, academics will have to do more than update websites which depict the struggles of the poor.

My own recent experiences of updating websites on behalf of the then repressed Landless People’s Movement (LPM), have taught me this. I have learnt that while websites do much to publicise movements to a group of left-leaning South African and international activists and scholars, they do little to actually mobilise and strengthen movements.

Merely amplifying the voices of the poor and assuming that those participating from below embody the truth, does not enable us to understand the potential and limitations of movements to challenge neoliberalism. Nor is there any possibility in this line of thinking to chart a way forward for liberation or to contest capitalism (which yes, is my own ideology and not necessarily that of the poor's).

Also sometimes, outsiders and researcher-activist s are in a position where they do not want to tell poor people what to do. Nor do movements want to be told what to do as the case of Abahlali brings into sharp relief. The role of academics in this movement has been to show struggles on websites, but never to critically engage with them or to share our own ideological direction in what the Brazilian activist-intellectu al and revolutionary, Paulo Freire called “Education for Critical Consciousness.”

These experiences indicate that Left academics who once critically evaluated the strategies and tactics of the anti-apartheid liberation movement while simultaneously maintaining a relationship with activists on the ground, have in the post-apartheid period abdicated their responsibilities.

It is time to rethink the role of intellectuals in social movements and to ask whether intellectuals are merely “outsiders” of movements or if the critical knowledge that we obtain from our research findings can be used to empower movements from the inside. This will involve shifting our emphasis away from giving presentations about the poor at small, unknown international conferences.

It also means acknowledging that while power lies in the hands of the poor and oppressed, the oppressed also need to develop political and strategic direction in order to bring about fundamental changes in society.

 http://www.ukzn.ac.za/ccs/default.asp?2,40,5,2016

Luke Sinwell is a post-doctoral fellow at the Research Chair in Social Change at the University of Johannesburg

Luke Sinwell
- e-mail: pdf2.csr@uj.ac.za
- Homepage: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/ccs

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Really....

27.04.2010 15:16

Luke Sinwell has never attended an AbM meeting. This is just slander dressed up as analysis.

Trot Watch


CCS rears its ugly head on UK IndyMedia

28.04.2010 09:00

It's hardly surprising that this comes from the CCS site. AbM has refused to have anything to do with this NGO (which has strong links to the SWP in the UK) for more than five years now. The reason for this is that it (the NGO) haas assumed for itself a right to lead popular struggles in Durban and has responded to autonomous struggles with out and out attacks.

Of course there has to be free and open debate but Sinwell knows nothing at all about how AbM works. He has never been to an AbM meeting. He really should have checked out how AbM actually works before writing up something like this that, to anyone that has spent time with the movement, just laughably innaccurate.

But he is close to Ashwin Desai - South Africa's George Galloway - who has done nothing by slander AbM since they declined to accept his authority over their struggle/

No surprises here


Alarmed!

08.05.2010 17:33

Now critique is being called slander? I have no idea who Luke Sinwell is, but having read his piece and the comments, I have a higher opinion of him than of his detractors.

Alarmed


analysis using hearsay

20.07.2010 21:43

Where's the primary research? Aren't you supposed to conduct at least a few interviews before pronouncing yourself as an expert on what this movement is and isn't?

from sa


also from SA. analaysis using observation

11.09.2010 14:42

Primary research takes many forms and interviews are just one of these. Interviews are by their nature interpretation. They tell us a lot about what people *think* but they don't tell us everything. There's also the question of what actually happened, which can be different from the motivations, intentions and opinions of those who make it happen. Sinwell makes no comments on Abahlali's internal workings but on its strategy and impact, and supports his points with reference to events that are in the public domain and the experiences of other movements too. This is also research.

I'm also 'from SA' and I've been involved in movements like abahlali since before abahlali existed. We make these kinds of critiques *inside* our movements all the time and no-one throws up a defensive wall. We argue, try to convince each other and sometimes just ignore each other and get on with it and learn by doing.

'From SA' and 'no suprises here' are in such a hurry to rush to abahlali's uncritical defence that they miss Sinwell's main point here which is a point about *building* movements:
"It is time to rethink the role of intellectuals in social movements and to ask whether intellectuals are merely “outsiders” of movements or if the critical knowledge that we obtain from our research findings can be used to empower movements from the inside. This will involve shifting our emphasis away from giving presentations about the poor at small, unknown international conferences.
"It also means acknowledging that while power lies in the hands of the poor and oppressed, the oppressed also need to develop political and strategic direction in order to bring about fundamental changes in society. "

tigrrrlily
mail e-mail: czerwoni@gmail.com


analysis based on observation and involvement

11.09.2010 15:42

Primary research takes many forms and interviews are just one of these. Interviews are by their nature interpretation. They tell us a lot about what people *think* but they don't tell us everything. There's also the question of what actually happened, which can be different from the motivations, intentions and opinions of those who make it happen. Sinwell makes no comments on Abahlali's internal workings but on its strategy and impact, and supports his points with reference to events that are in the public domain and the experiences of other movements too. This is also research.

I'm also 'from SA' and I've been involved in movements like abahlali since before abahlali existed. We make these kinds of critiques *inside* our movements all the time and no-one throws up a defensive wall. We argue, try to convince each other and sometimes just ignore each other and get on with it and learn by doing.

'From SA' and 'no suprises here' are in such a hurry to rush to abahlali's uncritical defence that they miss Sinwell's main point here which is a point about *building* movements:
"It is time to rethink the role of intellectuals in social movements and to ask whether intellectuals are merely “outsiders” of movements or if the critical knowledge that we obtain from our research findings can be used to empower movements from the inside. This will involve shifting our emphasis away from giving presentations about the poor at small, unknown international conferences.
"It also means acknowledging that while power lies in the hands of the poor and oppressed, the oppressed also need to develop political and strategic direction in order to bring about fundamental changes in society. "

tigrrrlily
mail e-mail: czerwoni@gmail.com


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech