yessir. NO SIR! – Private Joe Glenton – All war is wrong sir
mrs charity sweet | 25.04.2010 11:27 | Anti-militarism | History | Terror War | South Coast | World
The first thing I must do is offer the heartfelt apology of the nation to the mother of Joe Glenton. Thank you so much for raising such an amazingly patriotic, caring and intelligent fine young man. Your family’s suffering will not be in vain, I promise you this. The heart of the nation is with you.
It is with deepest regret and blind outrage that I must report the facts of what I witnessed in courtroom 4 of the Royal High Courts of “Justice”. Corrupt judiciary. Bent law. 4 real. (And folk wonder why I absolutely adore the English word bollocks when I am left with so many questions in my mind.)
Joe Glenton was to have his appeal for justice before the grand Igore Judge (sp?), the new head of the new and improved Supreme Court of Great Britain. Yes that is supposedly his real name as in his mother held him, knew he was one evil so-and-so, gave him that ridiculous name and slapped his face instead of his arse for obvious reasons. Igore ran his theatre of injustice like a bad West End show.
Exactly who wrote that rubbish script for that pathetic show of injustice the likes of which I have unfortunately seen many times before?
Dear Joe:
Nick Wrack, your barrister from Bernberg Pierce does not have your back. I watched him collude, aid and abet a bent judiciary of three fools in wigs, dresses n sashes sutting high upon their ‘safe’ perches- safe in the knowledge that someone had given them political cover to bend the law like Beckham. Does he come from a long line of Wracks?
Hoe is it that Joe was “advised” by Wrack that he COULD NOT possibly offer the honest and truthful defence of CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR as he could not possibly consider himself to be an absolute pacifist. Joe openly admitted that there were certain circumstances that would incite him to be the man that he is and fight back physically if absolutely warranted. That clearly does not justify nor change the fact that Joe is and remains a conscientious objector to illegal warfare despite legal semantics bollocks of Law Society bois who know all too well how to play the system.
How is it that Igore Ugly coincidently declared CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR as the only defence he would have entertained at the commencement of the trial – he gave up the game - as CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR was and is the correct defence Joe wished to advance and debate with the courts and was denied such by legal advice from whom and for whose benefit? Give over.
Why was Private Joe Glen ton’s defence witness statement NOT offered to the courts nor placed on court record? The big white elephant in the room that certain people didn’t want any comment on is called GENOCIDE.
How could the ARMY doctor refuse to diagnose Joe’s Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and the judiciary accept his ‘opinion’ that Joe was having difficulty “adjusting”; this is the very same doctor who told Joe his legs seemed fine and he could surely outrun a bullet to which case Joe sensibly refuted his lunacy.
Joe was having trouble ‘adjusting’ to exactly what bollocks? Loss of liberty for being courageous enough to tell the simple truth and question obvious lies?
How could ugly igore skim over the two most important inter-linked facts?
1. Joe Glenton, who recently lost his brother, was set to be re-deployed to the “theatre” Afghanistan within 9 months instead the recommended guidelines of an 18 month gap, despite suffering severe post traumatic distress and acknowledging this to his superiors while attempting to seek help with his mental health. He was unfit for duty which is hard for any man to admit, I would think.(WTF? Who the **** came up with calling areas of war theatre? Certainly not someone who was sending their beloved child up for possible slaughter, generally captured through “economic conscription”, as clearly pointed out to myself by Joe.)
2. How could the ugly igor declare that Joe refused psychological assistance being offered by the army when it was only on offer THE DAY AFTER JOE WAS SCHEDULED TO DEPART? Who has been ripping the piss and continues to do so?
The emotional abuse and blackmail that fine young man endured from igor… that he was a failure as a soldier, as a man and as a mate… letting down his mates, twisting the knife into Joe’s deep open wounds – the coffins he saw opening up in his nightmares, his mates he had wanted and tried to save, the people he truly wanted to help from the noblest of intentions of an Englishman’s heart.
Who gave political cover for wrack and igor judge dred to pervert the course of justice, sending Joe back to military Klink where his mates are also being punished for calling out “FREE JOE!”?
Bob Ainsworth – Minister of War? – wat u sayin brotha?
Article 10, Human Rights Act 1998 – Freedom of expression.
GENOCIDE IS A WAR CRIME and it is within international war law, Statute of Rome, Article 25, that any soldier who gives up the criminal intent and abandons all illegal activities shall not AND WILL NOT be held accountable for past crimes and WILL BE shown MERCY as well as soldiers may no longer offer the 1949 defence of “just following orders” while carrying on the states dirty business.
It’s all bollocks.
After voluntary return to England and handing himself in, Joe Glenton was charged with being Awol under the 1955 Desertion Act. The 2006 Armed forces Act was further used to heap another 5 new charges upon Joe as it was brought into force as a statutory instrument to punish soldiers in October, 2009(co-incidentally): desertion, disobeying lawful commands, disobeying a commanding officer and disobeying standing orders, i.e. not speaking to the media – a gag order on Joe Glenton and justice. The threatened total amount of time Joe faced losing his freedom for was 58 years.
Curiously, there is also a new military law that dictates all prisoners of war who escape, yes if you are caught and you come home, you too will spend 10 years in ENGLISH military klink because as a soldier you allowed yourself to be captured. Madness.
Wrack passed on the threat and Joe agreed to plead guilty instead of arguing a reasonable defence so the state wouldn’t look a complete twat in the eyes of the media by sending Joe down for a very long time which might have possibly sparked off nation and the army into open revolt as the majority of this nations, soldiers and civilians alike do not support these illegal wars of aggression being funded and waged by the tax payers pound.
Mr. Brian W. Haw has not been outside Parliament for the sake of his own health, but for the sakes of this nation’s sons and daughters and those of other nations that are being used as pawns in the fast growing globalisation and deregulation of money and violence - where human life and integrity bears no price tag.
Please read Joe’s brief statement and make up your mind for yourself.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Charity Sweet
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Private Joe Glenton? It's all bollocks sir - Mrs. Charity Sweet
yes sir. NO SIR! - Private Joe Glenton - Witness Statement of defence
It's all bollocks - Charity Sweet
This is the defence statement of Private Joe Glenton that the defence did not offer the courts? Y? Please copy and post this statement on any and every site you can find to support this real hero... perhaps lay a flower at the foot of Parliament in memory of those fallen heros and all the lost lives of children of war. "All war is wrong." - Joe Glenton
(Details of judicial corruption to follow shortly regarding his appeal 4 justice that fell on deaf war-mongering ears.)
Real HERO
STATEMENT OF WITNESS
(C.J.Act, 1967, S.9, M.C. Act, 1980, S. 102; M.C. Rules, 1981, S.70)
Statement of : Private Joe Glenton
Age of Witness : 27
Occupation of Witness : Real Hero
Address & Tel no : Military KLINK
This statement consisting of 1 page is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I make it knowing that, if it is tendered in evidence, I shall be liable to prosecution if I have willfully stated in it anything which I know to be false or do not believe to be true.
CDRILS – Values and Standards of the British Army
Courage – The courage to do the right thing, to not look the other way when you know something is wrong. Even if it is not the accepted attitude of your peers or superiors.
Discipline – Discipline to control your fear to make the difficult choices which face you.
Respect for others – To treat others respectfully. To make those around you a priority.
Integrity – Being honest with yourself and others. The integrity to say what must be said.
Loyalty – Looking after your comrades and putting them first. Loyalty to a team however does not mean you cover up illegal or immoral activity.
Selfless commitment – Teamwork. Putting yourself at risk for others> risking death, injury or even liberty to do what is right.
Standards must be lawful – All soldiers are subject to law wherever they are. International law, Law of armed conflict, Local law.
Appropriate – Honesty. Putting others first. Teamwork. Professionalism. Control alcohol. No Drugs. Control debt. No media.
If you follow these values/standards your superiors will victimize you, harass you, hang you out to dry. If you try to speak out you or protect yourself you will be gagged, submitted to trial, and imprisoned.
This is the price of Courage, Discipline, Respect for others, Integrity, Loyalty and Selfless commitment.
Ask your own conscience if what’s happening is right.
Because “Just following orders” stopped being an excuse in 1949.
No matter how noble your intentions.
Private Joe Glenton
mrs charity sweet
e-mail:
charitysweet@hotmail.co.uk